Audi Q3 vs Infiniti QX30

What's the difference?

So is this new Q3 good enough to remain Audi’s number one choice? In a word, yes.

Audi has resisted the temptation that some brands fall into by making too many changes to a proven sales performer. This new Q3 isn’t radically different from the old Q3, but it has improved in almost every way.

It isn’t different enough to widely expand its appeal to a new wave of customers, but there’s no reason it won’t remain Audi’s most popular choice for the foreseeable future.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

Even though it’s almost identical to the Q30, the QX30 manages to feel sufficiently different in suspension tune and cabin ambiance to be considered different.

It’s a disappointing oversight, though, by Infiniti to deny the base GT such basic safety fundamentals as a rear view camera (which Infiniti assures us is being worked on).

The brief to the designers was seemingly pretty simple - don’t mess with a good thing.

According to the company, they want it to be recognisable as an Audi from 100m away, but at the same time, it makes sense not to make any radical changes to a design that is clearly a hit with buyers.

There’s still a new grille, which is slightly larger, while the daytime running lights (DRLs) are now mounted high, on the top corners of the front fascia.

Audi prides itself on its lights and the Q3 features multi-segment DRLS, with dynamic light effects, plus the rear badge lights up red with the tail-lights are turned on.

Digital matrix LEDs are available as an option on the quattro grades, which is a first for such a small Audi. While based on the technology already deployed in the bigger, more expensive Audi models, this is an updated system with micro LED matrix capabilities that are better able to light up the road ahead without blinding cars ahead or oncoming.

One very noticeable element to the design of this new Q3 is the size - which hasn’t really changed. Audi has resisted the temptation that so many brands have to upsize a compact model and has instead retained the same size that buyers clearly find appealing. It is slightly longer, approximately 4cm, but is still unmistakably a Q3 in looks and size.

Inside the Q3 is a different story, with the designers clearly empowered to create more change. The elements remain similar, but there have been more dramatic changes compared to the exterior to keep the Q3 looking contemporary and luxurious.

For example, there are still two large screens, just like the old model, but the virtual cockpit and multimedia screen are integrated into the dashboard together and more prominently, moving higher up the centre fascia.

It works well, as the interior looks and feels premium, and very much an Audi, albeit on a smaller scale.

To cap it off there are four interior colour packages to choose from, plus four different choices for the inlays, including two real wood options and an aluminium trim.

The QX30 is one of the first projects to result from a technology partnership formed between the parent company of Mercedes-Benz and the Nissan-Renault Alliance.

In a sign of how worldly the car industry is becoming, the QX30 is built in Nissan’s Sunderland plant in the UK, using the German Mercedes-Benz A-Class platform and powertrains, all under Sino-French ownership via the Nissan-Renault Alliance.

On the outside, the design that first aired on the Q30 is pretty unique. It’s not a subtle car, with deep crease lines along its sides that, according to Infiniti, is an industry first in terms of manufacturing complexity.

When it comes to differences between the two vehicles, it’s minimal at best. There is a 35mm increase in height (30mm from taller springs and 5mm from roof rails), an extra 10mm in width, and extra trims affixed to the front and rear bumpers. Aside from the all-wheel-drive underpinnings, that is pretty much it for the exterior.

The same black plastic overfenders that are fitted to the Q30 are present on the QX30, with 18-inch rims on both the base model GT and the other variant, the Premium.

The dimensions of the QX30 are also an exact match for those on the Mercedes-Benz GLA, with the long front overhang acting as the main visual connection between the two cars.

The biggest change to the interior is the technology, with a new multimedia interface with new, larger tiles as well as new ‘Control Unit’ for the key driving functions.

The ‘Virtual Cockpit’ display is much simpler, with a nice, clean look, plus the option to have the satellite image on the screen, whether you’re in navigation or not. The multimedia screen is a good size (12.8 inches) and the menus are easy to navigate. The decision not to have physical controls for the climate control is disappointing, but thankfully there is a volume/on-off dial for the sound system.

The most notable difference is the so-called ‘control unit’ that integrates the indicators, wipers and gear selector on a single ‘bar’ mounted to the steering column. It’s another example of modern cars reinventing something we’ve all become accustomed to, but after a day of driving it quickly becomes second nature to adapt to the slightly different controls.

While it may be the same size, Audi has managed to find more room inside, particularly the rear, by redesigning the door pockets and sculpting out the seat backs. It’s still not the roomiest cabin, but the rear seats will be fine for younger families, couples and singles.

Another plus is the 40:20:40 split/fold rear seats for maximum practicality and adaptability, while all three have child seat anchor points (although if you do have three small children, I wouldn’t be recommending an SUV this size). 

As for the boot, because Audi only measures to the top of the seats, it measures 488L in both the SUV and Sportback variants, so you’re not missing out on day-to-day practicality with the sportier-looking roof. However, if you drop the rear seats the cargo capacity expands to 1386L in the SUV but only 1289L in the Sportback.

The QX30 is obviously very similar to the Q30 in many respects, but the interior is slightly different, with larger, less cosseting seats up front and slightly higher seats in the rear.

The cabin is also lighter in overall appearance, thanks to a paler colour palette.

There are plenty of neat inclusions, including a pair of USB ports, plenty of door storage, a space for six bottles and a sizable glove box.

A pair of cupholders resides up front, along with a pair in the fold-down armrest in the rear.

There is no particularly logical location for the storage of smartphones, though, and the lack of Apple CarPlay or Android Auto is down to Infiniti opting for its own phone connectivity suite.

A decent 430 litres of luggage space behind the rear seats is contrasted by a cramped rear area for all but the smallest of passengers, while sharply shaped rear door apertures making getting in and out a bit of an ask.

There are two ISOFIX baby seat points and a 12-volt socket in the rear, as well.

The QX30 will be offered in two variants; the base model GT at $48,900 plus on-road costs, while the Premium will cost $56,900.

Both come equipped with the same engine; a 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine that’s sourced from Mercedes-Benz and also used on the Q30 and Merc GLA.

Eighteen-inch rims are standard on both cars, while an electronic handbrake, 10-speaker Bose audio, 7.0-inch multimedia screen and a full set of LED lamps all round are fitted across both variants as well.

Unfortunately, the QX30 GT misses out on a reversing camera all together, a fate it shares with the Q30 GT. 

Infiniti Cars Australia told us that this was an oversight at the time the cars were being specced for Australia, particularly in light of the other technologies that the car would receive, like automatic emergency braking.

The company says it’s working hard to bring a reversing camera to the GT.

The top-spec Premium gets leather trim, a powered driver’s seat, and additional safety equipment like a 360-degree camera and radar cruise with brake assist.

The only optional extra on each car is metallic paint.

As mentioned above, there are three powertrains to choose from initially, with talk of a plug-in hybrid and hi-po RS Q3 just that (talk) for now.

The entry-level SUV and Sportback get a new 1.5-litre four-cylinder mild-hybrid, turbocharged petrol engine, which makes 110kW/250Nm and sends all that performance to the road via the front wheels through a seven-speed, dual-clutch automatic transmission.

Next up is the TFSI 150kW quattro, which is a bigger 2.0L turbo-petrol four-cylinder, producing (you guessed it) 150kW and 320Nm. It also has a seven-speed dual clutch but also unsurprisingly has a quattro, aka all-wheel drive.

Finally there’s the TFSI 195kW quattro, which has the same engine but tuned to make 195kW and 400Nm, also with the seven-speed, dual-clutch auto and all-wheel drive.

This is naturally the quickest Q3, at least until the RS Q3 arrives, taking just 5.7 seconds to accelerate 0-100km/h, compared to 9.1 seconds for the 110kW and 7.1 seconds for the 150kW.

Just the one engine is used across both cars; the 155kW/350Nm single-turbo 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol engine from the Q30 and A-Class.

It’s backed by a seven-speed transmission and wired into an all-wheel-drive system that is biased towards a front-drive configuration.

Sourced from Mercedes-Benz, up to 50 per cent of drive can be sent to the rear wheels, according to Infiniti.

While it may only be a mild hybrid, Audi has done its best to make the TFSI 110kW as fuel efficient as possible. To that end, in addition to the hybrid help this new 1.5-litre engine also features cylinder-on-demand.

The result is a claimed combined cycle fuel use figure of 5.7L/100km for the entry-level model.

Naturally the more powerful engines require more petrol. The 150kW models are rated at 7.3L/100km, while the 195kW has a claimed 8.1L/100km.

It’s worth noting that all three engines require a minimum 95 RON ‘premium’ fuel, which will only add to the cost at the pump in these times of high prices.

The 110KW/150kW models are fitted with a 55-litre fuel tank, while there is a bigger 60-litre tank for 195kW. That means theoretical driving ranges of approximately 960km for the 110kW models and just over 740km for the 150kW and 195kW offerings.

Infiniti claims a combined fuel economy figure of 8.9L/100km for the 1576kg QX30 across both the variants; this is 0.5L thirstier than the Q30 version.

Our brief test yielded a dash figure of 11.2L/100km over 150km.

While it may not be an RS model or a more dynamic sedan, part of the price premium you pay for an Audi is a more polished driving experience.

With that in mind, what Audi calls ‘Progressive steering’ (which is a variable ratio steering rack) is now standard across the range. This decision was driven by a desire to make the Q3 feel ‘more hatch-like’ to drive, being more responsive to driver inputs.

It certainly felt quite nice to drive at the launch, where we drove across a wide variety of conditions, including long stretches on winding mountain roads. The 110kW Launch Edition was enjoyable to drive in these conditions, even if the other two options offer a sportier driving experience with their extra power and all-wheel drive.

It should be noted again, we only drove Q3s fitted with adaptive dampers as those are included on the Launch Edition, so we can’t tell you how the true entry-level TFSI 110kW model rides and handles.

One minor concern was there were some rattles in one of the three cars we tested, centred around the dashboard and front doors. It’s notable because we have experienced similar potential build-quality issues with Volkswagen and Skoda products recently. This raises some questions about an area Volkswagen Group products have traditionally excelled in.

Having said that, it was only a problem in one of the three cars we drove, so it could be an isolated incident. But it’s something we will have to keep an eye and ear open to in future test drives.

Again, it would be easy to think that the QX30 would feel almost identical to its lower-riding sibling – but that would be incorrect. We criticised the Q30 for being a bit too buttoned down and unresponsive, but the QX30 feels more lively and involving, thanks to its unique spring and damper set-up.

Even though it’s 30mm higher than the Q, the QX doesn’t feel it at all, with a benign, pleasant ride with good body roll control and competent steering.

Our front-seat passenger complained of feeling a little ‘hemmed in’, which is a valid point. The sides of the car are very high, and the roofline is quite low, exacerbated by the steeply raked windscreen.

The 2.0-litre four-potter is smooth and punchy, and the gearbox well suited to it, but it’s lacking in aural character. Luckily the QX30 does a terrific job of suppressing noise before it gets into the cabin, then…

The QX30 gets seven airbags, auto emergency braking, forward collision warning and a pop-up bonnet as standard across the line.

The base GT does, however, miss out on a reversing camera.

The Premium model also offers a 360-degree camera, blind spot warning, radar cruise control and brake assist, traffic sign detection, reverse motion detection and lane departure warning.

The Q3 is covered by Audi Australia’s standard five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty. This includes five years of roadside assistance too.

There is a standard five-year servicing plan for $3300, which is the same as the outgoing model, with servicing required every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.

Audi has an expansive, nationwide dealer network befitting its place as an established sales leader in the premium space.

The Q30 is offered with a four-year, 100,000km warranty, and servicing is suggested every 12 months or 25,000km.

Infiniti offers a fixed three-year service schedule, with the GT and the Premium both costing an average of $541 over the three services provided.