Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Toyota Camry Hybrid: first drive

  • By Paul Gover
  • Herald Sun
  • image

    Paul Gover road tests the Toyota Camry hybrid at its Australian launch. Photo Gallery

Paul Gover road tests and reviews Toyota's new Hybrid Camry at its Australian launch.

The starting price for Australia's first green car is $36,990.  That's the showroom tag for the basic Toyota Camry hybrid, which finally hits the road today.  The hybrid is being pitched as the flagship in the Camry range, from the way it looks to a cabin that is claimed to set a new standard for quietness in a locally-made car.

The basic details of the Camry hybrid have been public since the car was introduced in 2006 in the USA, but there has been a lot of work on 'Australianising' the car, both for production and driving.  "Right from day one we knew that the American version wasn't going to work," says Phil King, who headed local chassis tuning work.

The result is a car which is claimed to be more responsive, as well as packing a full suite of safety gear. But it still misses a five-star ANCAP rating because it does not have a driver's knee airbag or an audible seatbelt warning.

Engine and economy

The Camry hybrid picks up the vast majority of its mechanical package from the third-generation Prius, which went on sale last year, although it has a 2.4-litre engine (up from 1.8) and still has a drive belt for the water pump, unlike the Prius. In fact, the car is really just a family-ised Prius.

The hybrid bottom line is fuel economy of 6 litres/100km, compared with 9.3 for the Holden Commodore V6 or 9.9 for Toyota's own Aurion, with performance that trims a full second from the petrol-powered Camry's 0-100km/h time. The CO2 number is 142 grams/kilometre, while Toyota claims a huge advantage in NOX and particulates over diesel powerplants with similar economy.

Price and equipment

The $36,990 pricetag compares to $29,990 for a basic Camry Altise, or $39,990 for a Prius hybrid.  But Toyota Australia says the real cost of the hybrid upgrade is just $2000. The extra fat in the hybrid pricetags is down to extra equipment, from TFT instruments to a special windscreen.

Toyota Australia is trumpeting plenty of equipment in the hybrid, which it says lines up with the Altise-model Camry with six airbags, ESP stability control, active steering assistance and a special power cut-off. There is also a Luxury model at $39,990, with option packs for both models _ at $3000 for the base car and $4500 on the Luxury - including satnav and premium sound.


But the Camry's boot has taken a hit to fit the onboard battery system.  "This hybrid can walk, and chew gum," says Peter Evans, technical chief for Toyota's imported cars.  Toyota made some very big claims for the Camry hybrid today, from a five-star green rating, to a four-star ANCAP, and the potential for 7000 kilometres of free motoring every year - compared to a Commodore.

Driving

The hybrid is still a Camry, but now with a twist.  Even the best efforts of the team at Toyota Style have done little to change the overall look of the car, apart from a slightly more aggressive nose with blue headlamps. Inside, the big change is the loss of the tacho, in favour of a green driving monitor, and a TFT screen with familiar Prius driving readouts.

First up, the Camry hybrid has a silent start. And you move away under battery power, although the car will only go two kilometres before it needs a top-up.  It feels a little firmer in the suspension, particularly over broken bitumen, and there is a familiar whirring sound under brakes as the generator works to recover energy for the batteries.

Overall, the car feels a lot quieter and a little tauter. But it's a matter of degrees, not a wholesale change. And the loss of boot space will be significant for families, even if Toyota says it will still carry four sets of golf clubs.

TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID

Price: from $36,900
Engine: 2.4-litre in-line four cylinder
Power:  110kW @ 6000revs
Torque:  187Nm at 4400rpm
Transmission: Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (E-CVT)
Body: Four door sedan
Seats: Five
Dimensions:  Length 4815mm, Width 1820mm, Height 1480mm, Wheelbase 2775mm, tracks front/rear 1575mm/1565mm
Steering: Rack and pinion, Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Suspension: Independent, MacPherson struts, L-arms, coil springs, gas dampers and ball jointed stabiliser bar; Independent dual link with coil springs, gas dampers and ball jointed stabiliser bar
Fuel tank: 65 litres
Fuel type: 91 RON or higher
Fuel consumption: 6.0/100km combined
Weight: 1645kg
Brakes: Electronically controlled brakes (ECB)
Wheels: 16 x 6.5J alloy
Tyres: 215/60 R16
Safety gear: rear-view camera, rear sonar parking sensors and six SRS airbags.
CO2 emissions: 142g/km (Combined system)

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 19 comments

  • Holdens do not fall apart, but according to my experience a Commodore is only good for 150,000 km after that they chew up money in repairs. As my Commodore is 15 years old and the car started to stop in the middle of traffic, had to go to a major Holden dealer to get it rectified; cost almost $1000.00 and now the engine light is on continuously and the dealer cannot quote me how much it would cost to rectify it. In other words wants to charge $110.00 per hour for an unlimited numbers of hours. The car is only worth $2500.00 according to Insurance. So I would give Holden 2 out of ten.

    William Hawil of Adelaide Posted on 24 April 2010 9:38pm
  • Just as a observer, and i may be wrong, but after watching the T.V. show on the real pollution saving owning a Hybrid, then the huge pollution foot print on scrapping the worn out car at the end of its life, It seems to be like my old boss used to say, you get a nice warm feeling peeing in a swimming pool, but who really notices, No i think the Diesel is the way to go, Sorry TOYOTA, but i think our many years of association, although happy, are about at an end, when i purchase a more sensible product that as a working person, i can afford to at least repair later.

    Dave Hayden of Tasmania Posted on 04 March 2010 8:48pm
  • To you not a fan. Holden fall apart do they???? You don’t watch the news. See that car Bomb in SA that was a commodore, just the roof pealed open. The idiots in NSW driving an SSV 200km’s p/h went through a medium strip, through a pole it landed 150mtrs away, hit an embankment and flew through the air and landed side on inside the roof of a house. Both people in this car go out with a few injuries. This is the current commodore. By the way Vectra was made in SA by Holden, see what happens when you open you mouth without thinking. You make an idiot of youself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    I suggest all you wanna bees check your reserch before you commenting. I do, it’s my job. The current model is voted by wheels mag to be as good as a BMW, my how quickly some of us forget.

    Holden mad of Brighton Vic Posted on 01 March 2010 11:20am
  • Aldo interesting that you bought a Mazda 6 diesel. We bought a CX7 diesel, and we love it!! As I keep saying, heaps of power and accelaration, sits on 110km at 2000 rpm right on the 400nm of torque. In these conditions we average 5.5 to 6 litres per 100km, and around 7 to 7.5 litres per 100km in the crappy Sydney traffic. Looking a few years down the track at trade in time I am sure that a diesel with out the need to replace expensive batteries, and capable of travelling high kms will have a better trade in value that a hybrid. By the way, I killed myself laughing when I read that ‘Australia’s most advance car’ only scored 4 stars in ANCAP ratings. How good is it that Kevin Dudd gave Toyota our money to build the Camry Hybrid, a car that Toyota was always going to build. Toyota has always been a company that builds boring, crappy cars for people that have no interest in driving and enjoying driveing. In recent times the realty and truth have finally surfaced.

    Con Verdis of ROZELLE Posted on 22 February 2010 7:12am
  • Thanks Aussie tax-payer for your massive subsidy, by the way we can’t actually make a five star safety rated car for even with esp and six airbags! Do Camry drivers actually drive anything more than 15000k/year, whats the point? Plant a few million trees instead. Does it drive like a pig camry as well? the article/press release was talking about styling and obfuscating the issue as is appropriate for this badge. “The most advanced car ever built in Australia” hmmmm?

    Best Practice? of Sydney Posted on 18 February 2010 4:51pm
  • I read Feb 12 Cars Guide and agree with Con and Rick.I recently purchased a Mazda6 Diesel which produces 137kw &400nm; of torque.The fuel economy is quoted at 5.9 lts per 100kms. (I have achieved as low as 5.4 lts per 100kms)I’ll never have to replace a bank of costly batteries and Ive got a boot that carries more than 4 golf bags. Compare that to a Camry Hybrid. As for fuel prices,some stations have cheaper diesel, some are dearer.On the Paul Gover story, I certainly do not believe that “The Hybrid Camry is undeniably a landmark car in our motoring history”. I believe that hybrids are just “fill in” cars and are neither one nor the other. By the way, can anyone remember the Aurion TRD which was supposed to take-on the Commodore ss/Clubsport and Falcon XR6/8. Where is it now? Gone to heaven?

    Aldo of casino Posted on 17 February 2010 10:40pm
  • I hope James Hunter is happy with his Citroen C5 but lets look at some real data from Redbook. The Camry hybrid is just 26kg heavier than the C5, not half a tonne (Compression ignition engines are usually cast iron). The cheapest C5 is $13,000 dearer than the Camry and uses 2.0l/100km more (urban) than the Camry and produces 37g/km more CO2. The C5 is also 1.1 seconds slower for the 0-100 time. The C5 also has zero Australian content. C5, why would you!

    Alan Gibson of Adelaide Posted on 17 February 2010 10:46am
  • 600 free kms eh? How about the much higher initial cost? And what about when the battery needs replacing?

    Warren Inman of Warner Posted on 16 February 2010 11:36am
  • Just shows how stupid and misleading the ANCAP system is. How does an audible seat belt warning make a car safer to have a crash in? Why isn’t there something in the equation that factors in a vehicles actual size putting you further from the impacts caused by an accident, therefore improving your chances of survival?

    Warren Inman of Warner Posted on 16 February 2010 11:33am
  • the Hybrid Camry has a power output of 140kw and not 110kw.

    get yr facts right Wayne !!!

    Sandeep Singh of brisbane Posted on 14 February 2010 2:55pm
  • Great timimg for Toyota to launch a hybrid with the Prius recalls worldwide. I agree with Wayne’s thoughts and comments. How often are you driving with 5 people in your car? 90% if not more of the time, I am driving by myself. Personally this whole hybrid thing is a myth. The purchase price, battery life, & cost of replacing the batteries - & regardless of what you are told, a battery is a battery & the day will come when it needs to be replaced - they arent cheap!! Add to that the effects on the environment in the manufatcure & the disposal of these batteries and it is just like the American Govt and tobacco companies when they told everyone that smoking was good for you and did no harm. Rick said is best regarding diesel & anyone that has travelled to Europe will have experienced diesel powered cars. We have owned our 1st ever diesel for 4 months, & we love it. Amazing economy, heaps of grunt, flies on the open road, you dont know that you are driving a diesel - none of our freidns believe that our car is a diesel. Complaints?- only 1 pump at every servo pumps diesel, the cost - diesel should be cheaper than petrol and by miles if overseas is anything to go by.

    Con Verdis of ROZELLE Posted on 12 February 2010 11:38am
  • Real Car Mad
    you got thos names in correct order ??
    seriously
    well you havent driven a citroen or peugeot??
    you want ESP that works without knuckledusting you?? go try.
    and you think only rear wheel drive?? go try a GOOD european.
    the C5 citroen has suspension you eat your heart out for. and though Citroen did licencee Rolls Royce and Mercedes dont recall they ever let GM near it.

    James Hunter of Metford NSW Posted on 11 February 2010 7:36pm
  • I am not sure what cars Wayne of Adelaide has been looking at but I can assure him, his comments on the carrying capacity of the Camry versus the i30 are way out. I have a Camry, and it cetainly will take care of 5 passengers and their luggage. However, my sister bought an i30 a while ago, and her thoughts are that it suits herself and husband well, but when their daughter goes any where with them, they quickly run out of room for their luggage (and her legs in the back seat!). Heaven help 3 adults in the back seat. Wayne, have you actually looked in the boot of the i30? One look will tell you the luggage space differs dramatically. The i30 is a great car, but not for 5 people.

    Matt of Newcastle, pity you didn’t have another 5 minutes of your break to factor in the residual value of the cars. The break even point would be lowered dramatically. The issue is, of course, the value is less about the dollars and more about the emmissions. Otherwise we would all be driving the cheap cars from India, wouldn’t we?

    Gordon of Adelaide Posted on 10 February 2010 9:19am
  • I agree somewhat with Matt from Newcastle about the fact that it will take circa 200,000km to repay the price difference between Hybrid and regular Camrys. A Toyota Camry of any description will carry 5 adults and their luggage and not much else. Amazingly, so will a Hyundai I30 Diesel. The Hyundai at $23990 costs some $13000 less than the Camry Hybrid whilst matching its 6.0 litres per 100km economy. Another factor to add to the equation is depreciation. If the Camry and I30 are worth say 60% of their original value in 3 years you would have lost $14796 on the Hybrid and only $9596 on the I30. So lets just add up fuel and depreciation costs over 3 years.
    Camry Hybrid 15,000 km per year fuel $1.30
    equals for 3 years = $3510 + depreciation = $18306 or 40c per km.
    The I30 Diesel auto even allowing diesel to be $1.40 (at the moment they are similar) would equate to $3780 fuel + $9596 depreciation = $13376 total = 30c per km. I also believe but cannot substantiate that the Camry would be much harder on tyres and as pointed out earlier the finance cost would make the difference even greater

    Wayne of Adelaide Posted on 09 February 2010 4:23pm
  • Electric braking has been used for years on heavy machinery (150t mining trucks !), trams etc. so it’s just a niggling problem. Toyota will sort it out. Hybrid technology is a stop-gap measure based on market research and the current climate change fear mongering from the over zealous left wing (and Rudd govt.). I’m more p#ssed off that diesel is still more expensive than petrol in Australia, when it’s cheaper to refine. Turbo diesel technology has been preferred in Europe for many years now, and is competitive with hybrid fuel efficienty and emissions. Technology is proven, and I for one would consider buying a turbo diesel Commodore, if Holden showed the vision to beat the others to it. At the moment I have to consider the European makes for a quality, mid or large size turbo diesel family car. A constant variable auto transmission is not fun to drive either !!

    Rick of somewhere in Oz Posted on 09 February 2010 2:00pm
  • Let’s do some basic maths here… $29,990 for a Camry Altise (8.8l/100kms), so this is $7000 more to get 6.0l/100kms (saving 2.6L / 100kms). And don’t believe for a minute that the extras like TFT screen are $5000 of the cost lmao. Say its $5000 difference…

    If petrol is $1.20/L (though I can find cheaper at the moment), 2.6 * $1.2 = $3.12 / 100kms saved

    $5000 / 3.12 = 1602.5 * 100kms you have to drive to make up the difference

    If you include the extra interest it costs for the bigger loan…
    $36990 loan over 5 years is $14,824.32 interest - $29990 loan over 5 years is $12,018.96 interest (both commbank), difference = $2805.36

    $2805.36 / 3.12 = 889 * 100kms

    So all up total is (1602.5+889)*100 = 249,150 kms to BREAK EVEN at current fuel prices.

    OK, I still have some of my lunch break to go, so lets say petrol cost $1.50 / L..
    $1.50 * 2.6L = $3.90 saved / 100kms

    $5000 / 3.9 = 1282 * 100 kms
    $2805.36 / 3.9 = 719 * 100 kms
    200,100 kms if fuel was @ $1.50

    Bargain lol

    Matt of Newcastle Posted on 09 February 2010 1:30pm
  • of course that extra half tonne of batteries is not going to effect the braking performance?? or the tyre life??
    yeh i believe in the tooth fairy
    Me I stick to my 2.2 /125Kw/370 Nm citroen C5. What toyota dont tell you ios that modern diesels with Particulate Filters DO NOT have the figures they spout. sounds like “The Dodgy Bros used car emporium” tell the public anything the Govt likes and anything to sell a ten year old yank design.

    James Hunter of Metford NSW Posted on 09 February 2010 11:32am
  • You sound like a 2 year old Real car mad. Not helpful at all - but I guess this is a free country so every kid is allowed to speak their mind.

    It sounds like Toyota does have some explaining to do with all this news on recalls. Its a huge bomb into their strong quality, reliability image. If Toyota can’t build a reliable car, who can? Holden definately can’t and the Commodore is living proof of a machine that falls apart quicker than a jenga tower game. Bring back the Vectra I say.

    Not a fan of anything of St Kilda, VIC Posted on 09 February 2010 11:24am
  • Toyota talks about the brakes being electric and can during braking, convert to hyd breaking. This is ok, but in Australia all roads are bumpy and under heavy braking, I just want brakes that pull up!!!!!. Mr Toyoda said himself that this is the case and what do customer want?????. I WANT BREAKS IDIOT!!!!. Then I want to know once and for all, How much they batteries are to replace and how often. They do claim this car dose require more servicing than the regular Prius. Give me a 5 star rear wheel drive Commodore with stability control that really works. Correct me if I’m wrong but is voted the best stability control on the planet. Toyota’s are cheaper to build. I want to see from cars guild a bit of smarts, lets do a full comp of the Holden and the Camry, include service, fuel and battery replacements. Only then can you or Toyota make such a claim. Put up or shut up.

    Real car mad of Brighton Vic Posted on 09 February 2010 9:50am
Read all 19 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links