Suzuki Vitara vs Mazda CX-5

What's the difference?

In car years, 11 is ancient.

Back when it was first released, this-generation Vitara’s competitive pricing, progressive yet pretty design, pleasant interior packaging, sporty dynamics and general driving ease helped establish the emerging small SUV segment into the powerhouse it is today.

In some ways, today’s Turbo Hybrid still impresses, especially with its punchy performance, promising economy and no-nonsense packaging. Objectively, it is still a decent proposition, with few actual vices.

But the 2026 Vitara’s high pricing, embarrassingly outdated interior, underwhelming specification and noisy ride leave it feeling too expensive, too old and too exposed against newer and more-sophisticated rivals.

Even the brightest stars eventually need to retire.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel and meals provided.

The Mazda CX-5 Evolve kicks some goals and with its comfortable on-road handling, robust safety equipment and practical interior, it’s still a solid choice for families looking for a mid-sized SUV. The only thing it’s missing is a hybrid powertrain, which would make this already well-rounded package even more compelling.

While the albeit-cheeky Mazda CX-3 clearly looks like a product of last decade, the Vitara’s boxy, broad-stance proportions were prescient, pointing to the upright shapes that prevail today. In other words, the good-looking design has aged remarkably well.

Changes to the headlights, a reshaped bumper, a revised grille, restyled wheels and paint colours are the only ways you can differentiate new from old, ignoring the Hybrid badge out back.

We wonder whether Suzuki should have tried harder visually updating the Vitara?

Measuring in at nearly 4.2 metres long, 1.8m wide and 1.6m high, the square-rigged styling hides the smallness of the Vitara, yet also seems to liberate more space inside than you might expect, aided by deep side windows.

Conversely, Suzuki’s decision to retain the old Vitara dashboard – including much of the same instrumentation – roots it into the middle of last decade. This is very disappointing.

The next-generation Mazda CX-5 is bigger than before, but it retains the sleek body lines and understated styling that have made it such a handsome SUV. The wider front end and repositioned grille give it a more purposeful look than the outgoing model, while the 17-inch alloy wheels keep things suitably restrained.

Inside, the cabin doesn’t feel too basic despite the cloth upholstery. There are plenty of soft-touch materials, a pleasant dashboard and some new technology, including the 12.9-inch multimedia display. You lose most of the physical buttons, though, so there’s a little less of that traditional Mazda tactility.

The fabric seats are cosy and the extra interior space is definitely noticeable. Overall, there is still an understated elegance to the CX-5’s cabin.

The practical shape, ease of access and spacious, airy cabin were reasons to buy the Vitara way back when, and remain relevant today.

But, stepping inside and taking a look around transports you to another time, like hearing Let it Happen by Tame Impala.

In the press release, Suzuki states: “Physical control switches remain a key focus, ensuring ease of use while driving, a touchpoint of Suzuki’s practical design philosophy.” Changing nothing in nearly a dozen years in production to save money seems more like the company’s key focus here. Even the steering wheel is precisely the same.

As we said earlier, nothing changed inside other than some minor trim, save for the new multimedia system that looks cheap and aftermarket compared to Suzuki’s earlier, distinctive and colourful quadrant layout. We welcome the inclusion of a digital speedometer, however.

Broad if flat front seats do the job, ahead of a workable driving position that helps provide good all-round vision as well as an easy reach to the multitude of buttons and switches placed around. The plastics have already proven to be long-lasting, while there is sufficient storage to be found. The climate control is effective, too.

The rear seat environment is spacious and pleasant enough, but lacks amenities like USB-C ports, cupholders and central air vents.

Further back, the load area is relatively large and simple to use. Cargo capacity varies from an unremarkable 362 litres to 642L (VDA – to the window height) or 1119L (to the ceiling), with the 60/40 rear backrests dropped providing extra versatility.

Thankfully, a space-saver spare wheel is included.

Overall, then, the Vitara’s cabin is roomy and user-friendly for a small SUV, but it also appears hopelessly out of date. That Suzuki also had the unrelated e-Vitara electric vehicle at the launch event just served to underline that fact.

The front seats are a particularly comfortable place to spend time, with wide seat bases and plenty of elbow room. Getting in and out is easy thanks to the wide door apertures and 205mm of ground clearance and there’s enough space to settle in for a longer journey.

There’s also plenty of useful storage up front, including a large glove box, dual-opening centre console, cupholders and bottle holders, plus a dedicated phone tray with wireless charging. You get a 12-volt socket and two USB-C ports for keeping everything else topped up.

The 12.9-inch multimedia screen replaces Mazda’s familiar rotary selector with touchscreen operation, which I find easier to use. The updated operating system takes a little while to get your head around and there’s no native sat nav, but otherwise it feels functional and fresh for the new-generation model. Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard, with CarPlay maintaining a solid connection throughout my week.

The extra size of this next-generation model is more noticeable in the back, where improved leg- and headroom is good news for taller adults on longer trips. The rear doors open to almost 90 degrees, making it easier to access the ISOFIX child-seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points.

There’s not a huge amount of extra family-focused kit back in the rear row, but you do get directional air vents, storage bins in each door and a centre armrest with cupholders. My nine-year-old was comfortable, although he did point out the lack of a charging port during a road trip.

And, as a parent, I had one other gripe: keeping the fabric seats clean from my kid’s shoes in rainy weather. Let’s just say some seat covers might be a worthwhile investment.

The boot offers up to 466L with all seats in use. That’s not the largest capacity in the class, but it was more than enough for my little family of three this week. I like the level loading floor, although the boot itself is quite tall, which can make lifting heavier items in and out a little awkward.

I’m also pleased to see a spare tyre, even if it is only a space-saver. And while a powered tailgate would be handy, at this price point I don’t think you’ll really miss it... until you’re standing there with your hands full!

There are five variants available for the third-generation Mazda CX-5, and we’re in the second-from-base Evolve grade for this review. It has a competitive $42,990, before on-road costs price, which puts it neatly among its key rivals. The Hyundai Tucson Hybrid starts at $42,850, while the Kia Sportage SX+ petrol begins at $45,580 and the Toyota RAV4 GX 2WD Hybrid at $45,990, all before on-road costs.

On price alone, the CX-5 looks well placed. But there’s one notable difference - all three rivals offer hybrid powertrains in their respective ranges, while the CX-5 currently does not. And as hybrid power becomes increasingly common in this segment, that omission could prove harder for Mazda to overlook.

The Evolve grade enjoys some solid features though, including:

• Heated front seats
• 12.9-inch multimedia touchscreen
• 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster
• Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto
• Bluetooth
• AM/FM/digital radio
• Leather steering wheel
• Dual-zone climate control
• Two 12-volt sockets
• Wired/wireless phone charging
• Cloth seats
• Keyless entry
• Keyless start
• Rain-sensing wipers
• Electric/auto-folding side mirrors
• LED headlights
• LED DRLs
• Reversing camera

If you’re expecting a Toyota-style series-parallel hybrid system here, forget it.

Instead, Suzuki offers a far-simpler, lighter and cheaper alternative that, by and large, does reduce fuel consumption. In other words, this is a mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) that, unlike others like Mazda’s, you can feel working away.

On paper, things look a bit shaky, since power drops noticeably compared to the previous 1.4-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol BoosterJet engine this unit is based on.

This version makes just under 81kW of power at 4500rpm, instead of 103kW at 5500rpm, in the interests of economy. Torque jumps though, from 220Nm to 235Nm, between a low 2000rpm to 2500rpm.

More importantly, it is coupled to a 48-volt integrated starter motor generator acting as an electric motor, and 48V 8Ah lithium-ion battery, adding an additional 12kW/50Nm to simultaneously boost acceleration and reduce consumption and emissions.

Power is sent to the front wheels via a six-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, while the AWD version also sends drive to the rear axle when slippage is detected.

The whole MHEV system adds just 15kg, and is nestled between the MacPherson strut front axle and torsion beam rear end, for even weight distribution.

The CX-5 is all-wheel drive and powered by a 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine producing 132kW of power and 242Nm of torque. It has a braked towing capacity of up to 1800kg, giving you the option of some light towing on the weekends, while the six-speed automatic transmission shifts smoothly through its gears.

But there’s no escaping the fact that most of its key rivals now offer hybrid powertrains, and you can feel the absence of one here. The CX-5’s petrol engine is perfectly capable, but it doesn’t have the same efficiency advantage that many buyers in this segment are increasingly looking for.

The Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD returns a combined average 5.8 litres per 100km, while the AWD version is rated at 5.9L/100km. This translates to between 130 grams and 139g/km of carbon-dioxide emissions, respectively.

The previous 1.4-litre turbo equivalents were 5.9L and 6.2L/100km, so that mild-hybrid tech seems to make some difference. Our box-fresh test car’s trip computer driving around Sydney’s outer suburbs displayed 6.2L/100km.

Filling the 47L fuel tank with the required 95 RON premium-unleaded petrol, expect to average around 810km of range.

The CX-5 has a 58-litre fuel tank and claimed combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption of 7.4L/100km, giving it a theoretical driving range of up to 783km. That’s a solid range for a family-sized SUV and means you won’t be constantly thinking about your next fuel stop.

My real-world fuel use settled at 7.8L/100km after a week of longer highway stints and urban trawls, so it’s not too far off Mazda’s official number.

Still, this is where I’d like to see a hybrid powertrain join the CX-5 range. The fuel economy is reasonable, but with so many rivals now offering hybrid options, Mazda is starting to leave some efficiency gains on the table.

Suzuki allowed only a frustratingly limited amount of time for us to drive the Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD, over some outer-suburban Sydney back roads, in convoy with a lead car and in heavy traffic, so first impressions are limited.

But, unsurprisingly, it’s all very familiar, after years of testing earlier iterations.

Essentially, acceleration now feels leisurely in 'Eco' and 'Auto' when previously the 1.4L BoosterJet always felt punchy, but it becomes much stronger in 'Sport', suggesting the MHEV’s economy focus is the priority. The latter mode makes the Vitara feel lively and moves things along fairly quickly, but leaving it in Sport mode would defeat the purpose of trying to save fuel.

Meanwhile, the Vitara’s chassis calibration remains on the sporty side, with keen steering response and a decent level of handling agility there for the taking. And even the ride comfort wasn’t too bad, considering that too little suspension travel and too much road noise betray the age of this vehicle’s platform – though that may have also had something to do with us driving this back-to-back with the smoother e-Vitara EV.

Finally, the ADAS tech didn’t seem to interfere at all, though a longer drive may reveal otherwise.

The Vitara still drives okay, then, but its refinement and noise suppression may be issues for some people used to newer SUVs. The bigger problem for us is just how old the driving experience feels sitting inside such a dated cabin. Stale sums it up.

We also had a brief stint around a moderately-demanding off-road 4WD course to test the Turbo Hybrid AWD’s AllGrip set-up. The limited off-road aids – 4WD Lock, hill-descent control, a paltry 175mm ground clearance – helped see it navigate several carefully-chosen sections fairly confidently, but we can’t imagine this being the deal maker or breaker.

Overall, based on our brief time with it, the Vitara Turbo Hybrid remains an easy, competent and even enjoyable small SUV from behind the wheel, but one that feels dated in too many areas, especially at its asking price.

The CX-5 feels composed around town, with power delivered smoothly for everyday driving. But when you need to punch it off the mark, there’s some noticeable lag, and you have to work the engine harder to find the power when tackling a steeper hill at higher speeds. It’s capable enough, but it can feel like you’re asking a little more of it than you should.

The suspension has a firm edge to it, but I like how responsive the steering feels. The CX-5 is genuinely enjoyable through corners, with a dynamic feel and very little body roll.

The cabin is also impressively quiet, with minimal road or wind noise creeping in at higher speeds. Visibility is good through the front and sides, although the A-pillar can get in the way at times.

The reversing camera provides a clear view, while front and rear parking sensors make manoeuvring easier. Overall, it’s not a difficult SUV to park, despite its larger dimensions.

The Mazda CX-5 has a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating from testing conducted in 2025, with strong results across all four assessment categories.

It scored 90 per cent for adult occupant protection, 91 per cent for child occupant protection, 93 per cent for vulnerable road user protection and 87 per cent for its safety assist systems.

Other equipment include:

• 10 airbags
• Blind-spot monitoring
• ISOFIX child seat mounts
• Three top-tether anchor points
• Driver attention alert
• Driver monitoring
• Front collision warning
• Front cross-traffic alert
• Lane departure alert
• Lane keeping aid
• Rear cross-traffic alert
• Reversing camera
• Traffic sign recognition
• Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) - operational from 0-180km/h.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, along with five years of roadside assistance if the vehicle is serviced at an authorised dealer.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, while the basic capped-price servicing costs are $329, $429, $339, $539 and $349 annually for the first five years or 100,000km, respectively. That's an average of $397.

At the time of publishing Suzuki listed 90 dealers throughout Australia.

The CX-5 is covered by Mazda’s five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, which also includes five years of roadside assistance. It’s a solid offering, although longer warranty terms are becoming increasingly common in this segment.

Servicing is reasonably priced at around $440 per service over seven years, and the intervals are well spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. That should make ongoing ownership relatively straightforward for families.