Articles by Byron Mathioudakis

“Wow, is that a Bentley?”Our week with Hyundai Motor Group luxury brand Genesis’ GV60 provided its fair share of surprises.Yet the fact that onlookers mistook it for one of Britain’s (via Volkswagen Group) finest wasn’t actually one of them, given the blatant similarity with the badging and cross-hatch grille.Recently facelifted with a substantially lower starting price, the new base GV60 Series II enters a busier class of small electric SUVs from when the original launched in 2021.How does it play out today? Kicking off from $88,300 (all prices are before on-road costs), the GV60 Advanced rear-wheel drive (2WD) is now the most affordable new Genesis in Australia.But it remains a bit more expensive than most direct and more popular premium small electric SUV rivals, despite enduring a dramatic power cut from 234kW to 168kW.This includes the BMW iX1 AWD (from $77,900), as well as the substantially cheaper Mini Countryman SE, Renault Megane E-Tech, Volvo EX40 and Zeekr 7X.The Advanced claps back in a number of ways, however.For starters, it’s one of the few electric SUVs in this class (along with the Renault and Zeekr) using a dedicated EV architecture (E-GMP), instead of sharing a platform with an internal combustion engine (ICE) sibling. This cuts compromise and pays dividends for efficiency.Secondly, the GV60 features 800-volt electrification rather than almost every other rivals’ 400V system, substantially speeding up charging. This is a remarkably sophisticated machine.And, thirdly, convenience items abound, with walk to/away central locking, heated front and rear outboard and vented electric front seating, a toasty steering wheel and powered tailgate.Other GV60 features include:A (bigger) battery at 84kWh offering 561km of WLTP rangeA (significantly larger) widescreen display at 27 inchesA heat-pump heater with driver-only zoning to help rangeMulti-level single-pedal drive using regenerative braking via paddle shiftersVehicle to Load (V2L) external appliance poweringFive years free servicingBackup Light Guide – a reverse-gear light projection on to the gutter to help avoid alloy wheel rashThe consensus is the Advanced neither looks nor feels like an entry-level proposition. Expensive, but worth it. The facelifted GV60 remains an attractive, rounded compact SUV/crossover with a sporty premium hatch look.For 2026 it ushers in redesigned lighting elements, reprofiled bumpers, more body coloured trim, revised alloy wheels and a new underbody cover for improved aero efficiency.But the GV60 has always lived in the shadow of its somehow more glamourous E-GMP siblings, the elegant Hyundai Ioniq 5 and racy Kia EV6. Particularly as they cost significantly less.At least Genesis has been able to meet brand expectations inside. The GV60 seems more compact inside than other electric SUVs in its class, and even against the Ioniq 5 and EV6.However, the new elongated touchscreen with its improved graphics (whilst retaining button access functionality), sumptuous front seats, lovely steering wheel and quality materials do elevate it.Again, there’s nothing base about the Advanced.Genesis also provides plenty of surprise and delight items, like that anti-gravel-rash kerb illuminator, drawer-style glovebox, tunnel storage under the centre console, strange swivelling gear-lever ball and secret storage thanks to a compartmentalised boot floor.Cargo capacity is limited by the coupe-like styling, so can’t match a BMW iX1, though with 432 litres VDA (expandable to 1460L), it is far better than, say, a Mazda3 or Toyota Corolla.However, the lack of a spare wheel is a disappointment. Under the bonnet is 53L of additional ‘frunk’ storage, so that’s also helpful.That’s because the 168kW/350Nm electric motor is on the rear axle, driving the rear wheels. This layout gives the Genesis an unexpected athleticism, which in turn makes it fun to drive fast.Acceleration is still very brisk despite the power downgrade, and in Sport throttle response is downright rapid, while the smooth power delivery is matched by the linear, controlled steering, that provides a decent degree of feedback. In the wet it’s easy to momentarily break rear-wheel traction.And while the suspension possesses a sporty edge, the Advanced’s ride quality is also supple enough when comfort is a priority. The E-GMP’s chassis sophistication really shines through. If you’re a driving enthusiast, the small premium you pay for a GV60 is worth it for the dynamic flair delivered. Being an E-GMP EV, the efficiency’s not too bad at all, especially considering how much we enjoyed the Advanced out on our rural road drive. Our average was 15.8kWh/100km (indicated), and were on track to achieve about 485km range from the big 84kWh battery. The WLTP range is 561km. More sedate commuting would see that improve markedly. Scoring a five-star ANCAP rating in 2022, the GV60’s update saw the addition of a broader amount of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) tech – namely improved lane-support capabilities.Along with autonomous emergency braking (AEB), the Advanced includes 10 airbag, surround-view cameras, safe-exit assist and what Genesis calls Full Micro Lens Array LED headlights for better nighttime illumination.Still on security, Genesis offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty (130,000km for fleet buyers) with roadside assistance, trailing Kia and Hyundai’s seven-year guarantee. Why not all for one and one for all?On the other hand, servicing is free for the first five years.

Earlier this month, Audi unveiled a retro-inspired small electric vehicle that is a homage to a car that failed a quarter of a century ago. Spectacularly.Chances are the timely and handsome new A2 will succeed where the overpriced and oddly styled original from 2001 could not, but referencing a flop seems risky.It’s like Ford reviving the AU Falcon (though to be fair it is having a moment), or General Motors exhuming Holden with an ode to the ZB Commodore. Or Epica.Which has us thinking: this isn’t the first time that nostalgia, perhaps served with a side plate of delusion, has led to some confounding decisions.Whether they sold or were received poorly, we outline five resurrections that flopped.And if you disagree, let us know why in the comments below.How the millennial Monaro came about requires context.Holden enjoyed two golden eras: the early years, and for half a decade from 1997, after the then-new VT Commodore became a runaway smash hit.And the next year’s Australian International Motor Show in Sydney was pivotal.Codenamed Monica, the 1998 Holden Coupe Concept – essentially a VT with two doors, a slightly more-rakish windscreen and four (lower) seats – stole the show like no other car ever had before or since.At the time, Holden wasn’t even planning to build it. After all, coupe shelf lives are notoriously short. The original HK Monaro of 1968 proved popular initially, but its HQ-HX successors from 1971 struggled.The Coupe Concept utterly overshadowed Ford’s debuting AU Falcon at the Sydney show, made national news and created a buzz that helped bolster the brand. It was nothing short of sensational. Journalists immediately dubbed it Monaro, something Holden was understandably wary of.Despite what some articles today state, the resulting V2 Monaro failed to meet internal sales expectations when it arrived far later than scheduled, in November, 2001.Priced beyond most buyers’ reach from nearly $95,000 adjusted for inflation today, it went on to account for only a fraction of Commodore volume, at 4274 versus 88,478 units, putting it at 47 spot.From there, sales never improved, and the US-market Pontiac GTO export version of 2004 also failed to find a large-enough audience.By then, GM was floundering as the world moved away from sedans and coupes, in favour of SUVs, with the planned next-generation VE Monaro promptly canned, save for the 2008 Coupe 60 Concept to celebrate Holden’s 60 Anniversary.The Datsun 1600 is regarded as one of Japan’s earliest greats.Launched in 1967, it combined elegant styling with European-style chassis sophistication, to create a brilliant little sedan that dominated world rallying as effortlessly as it won over owners’ hearts.However, the larger and heavier 180B and 200B replacements of 1972 and 1976 respectively completely lacked the 1600’s sporty charm.Stung by widespread criticism, Datsun attempted to recreate the magic with the Stanza in 1978.But, built down to a price, it sorely lacked the fun and finesse that endeared so many owners to the old 1600. Critics were ruthless in their reviews. And though relatively popular and successful in motorsport, the Stanza couldn’t replicate the old 1600’s greatness and lasted only a single generation in Australia.By all objective means, any NSX is a masterpiece.Be it the exquisite 1990 NA1 original that became the first mid-engined supercar in history to love you back, or the NC1 tri-electric motor petrol/hybrid AWD successor of 2016 that was a breathtaking technological showcase, the name signifies engineering mastery.However, while neither generation achieved the sales volumes Honda required, the original has enjoyed a glorious afterlife as one of the all-time sports car greats.But the latter? Sadly, the second – or American – NSX remains misunderstood as being too advanced, and not “analogue” enough for drivers to truly connect with. That Honda cancelled it early (except in Japan) has not helped.Maybe the NC1 was just a decade before its time. Still an amazing achievement.One of Japan’s earliest Volkswagen Golf clones, the Pulsar became a beloved small-car staple in Australia over 25 years and six generations from 1980.That was until Nissan was forced to switch to a smaller replacement with awkward styling, ambitious pricing and a silly name.Inevitably, the 2006 Tiida tanked, even as Australians were clamouring towards smaller cars in the wake of soaring fuel prices. This was the era where the Mazda 3 and Toyota Corolla were king, but Nissan missed the party completely.The reason why the Pulsar ended was that it never properly challenged the Golf, so instead Nissan devised the Qashqai crossover, which immediately became a sales phenomenon.Somehow, Nissan Australia convinced a reluctant Japan to allow the redesigned Tiida hatch of 2012 to be rebadged Pulsar, along with the Thai market Sylphy sedan.Hopes were high of a sales revival but neither interloper possessed the required sophistication or appeal to lure local consumers back. Both Pulsar iterations never saw out their model cycle.The rear-engined air-cooled Beetle, which changed comparatively little between 1937 and 2003, remains the world’s best-selling vehicle of all time, at 21.5 million units.In contrast, the Toyota Corolla regenerated 12 times to date for it to find 50 million buyers.The re-imagined New Beetle, released globally in 1997 and 2000 in Australia, based on the versatile Golf IV architecture and built inexpensively in Mexico, sold strongly at first.But demand tapered off markedly as per most fashion statements, especially when BMW’s Mini reset the bar for retro remakes from 2001.However, after nearly 1.2 million units, VW’s third attempt, officially known as the “The Beetle”, struggled from the outset in 2012, despite featuring significantly more sophisticated drivetrains.Gone by 2019, barely 550,000 units were produced worldwide.

Arguably the year’s most anticipated new model has finally broken cover, and initial reports are promising.After being poured over by the global press and driven briefly under strictly controlled conditions in Japan, the general consensus is that the latest-generation, NU-series Mitsubishi Pajero will be a formidable 4x4 wagon contender when sales commence in December.This is what it has going for it and what concerns still need to be addressed.Strong points include design presence, an unexpectedly refined interior, thoughtful packaging, a competent yet refined on- and off-road chassis tuned with Australian preferences in mind, and competitive pricing.Only the lack of a hybrid powertrain option could hold the new Pajero back, though company executives have indicated one is coming in time.Still, a conditional 10-year warranty, should give popular rival 4x4 wagons like the Toyota Prado, Ford Everest and Isuzu MU-X something new to worry about.But it is the choice of an old name that Mitsubishi has resuscitated for its large SUV that might create confusion. Particularly when the advertising tag line screams: “All-New Pajero: The Legend is Returning.”That’s because the 2026 Pajero is not a modernisation of the previous, third/fourth-generation, NM-NX-series 4WD from 2000 to 2021 that the badge and promotion clearly imply.Instead, it is a successor to the smaller, cheaper and less-sophisticated Pajero Sport (now defunct), which was derived from generations of previous Triton utes. That started off as the Challenger initially, in the late 1990s, until the name changed in 2015.As such, expectations of the NU Pajero need to be tempered.Mitsubishi used to offer 4x4 wagon buyers real choice.Despite being smaller and less expensive, the previous Pajero was considered a strong alternative to the Toyota LandCruiser and Nissan Patrol.This was so even as the latter two grew into the Upper Large SUV category four-wheel drive (4WD) as they changed.Meanwhile, it was the simpler Challenger and Pajero Sport’s job to chase the Prado, as well as the 2000s-era Nissan Pathfinder, Everest, MU-X and the Holden Colorado 7/Trailblazer.It’s true that, although based off the current Triton, the NU Pajero is considerably bigger than the Pajero Sport was, and larger even than the old Pajero.But people expecting an alternative to the full-sized LandCruiser 300-Series and Y63 Patrol giants, which are bigger again, will find the Mitsubishi is not in the same official size category.That point alone should have had the company thinking twice about using the Pajero nameplate.The previous Pajero was a revolution when the NM series debuted at the 1999 Tokyo Motor Show.That’s because it was designed and engineered to be at the forefront of large off-road-capable SUV technologies, and did it with such aplomb that it cemented the Mitsubishi’s reputation along the way.Among many progressive features was an advanced monocoque body with an integrated ladder-frame chassis, eschewing the old-fashioned body-on-frame construction for a lighter, more-rigid and roomier solution.The upshot provided the old Pajero with far more car-like on-road dynamics, control and safety than the previous (1981 original and 1991 second-gen) iterations, while still being able to deliver exceptional off-road capability and robustness.This happened years before Land Rover, then under BMW ownership, managed something similar in the full-sized 4WD wagon space with the L322 Range Rover of 2002. Mitsubishi got there first, and it was a revelation LandCruiser and Patrol has never matched.Cash-strapped Mitsubishi reportedly didn’t have the funds to develop another monocoque, truly full-sized Pajero, so upsized and improved the body-on-frame Triton ute and its Pajero Sport SUV offshoot to fill that role.It makes economic sense, because the competition has long done something similar, but it is still a retrograde step from the old Pajero.Already comfortably better than the previous Pajero Sport, whether the NU Pajero will have the same elevated bandwidth of dynamic capabilities when we drive it in Australia remains to be seen.The final old Pajero used a 147kW/441Nm 3.2-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine dubbed DiD, giving it sufficient low-down torque capabilities as well as adequate on-road performance.On paper, the NU Pajero’s 150kW/480Nm 2.4L turbo-diesel’s outputs exceed the old version. Around 62kW per tonne versus 59.5kW per tonne in the power-to-weight ratio stakes.But how will that translate in actual Australian conditions, especially against the V6 turbo-diesel alternatives as found in the latest LandCruiser and Patrol?And that's not even taking in the electrified big 4x4s from China like the Denza B8 PHEV.With diesel prices still spiking this year, the electrification of the NU Pajero cannot come soon enough.Especially as the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) that limits carbon dioxide tailpipe emissions becomes stricter over time.Like we said, the 2026 Pajero falls into line with its popular rivals in being an affordable entry point into 4x4 wagon motoring without having to pay LandCruiser and Patrol prices in order to do so.In all likelihood, a ground-up monocoque-bodied Pajero replacement would have cost a lot more to buy, so Mitsubishi’s decision ultimately does make sense.

If you’re getting impatient for an affordable alternative to the blistering Hyundai Ioniq 5 N then you’ll have to wait a little longer.Soaring demand compounded by lagging production schedules have delayed the release of what promises to be one of the most exciting affordable electric vehicles (EVs) coming to Australia in the foreseeable future.That’s the Skoda Elroq RS (for Rallye Sport), a mid-sized SUV pocket-rocket from Czechia, with dual electric motors for all-wheel drive.Expected to start from about $65,000, it's now likely to arrive sometime in the second quarter of 2027.According to Skoda Australia Head of Product and Marketing, Kieran Merrigan, strong interest due to the spiking fuel prices caused by the war in the Middle East earlier this year caught the brand shorthanded.“One vehicle we said we were going to bring this year was the Elroq RS,” he admitted to the Australian media at a recent Kodiaq RS and Enyaq RS snow/ice-driving demonstration event in New Zealand.“We have delayed it slightly, not because we wanted to. It was more about during the high demand for electric cars (as a result of the fallout of geo-political issues that really took hold from the second quarter of this year). We also ran into production of Elroq.”Kerrigan added that working through the growing order bank for the regular Elroq, which launched late last year from $49,990 drive-away, making it one of the most affordable and best value European EVs in Australia, was the priority.In other words, there was no point releasing a 180km/h performance flagship grade with no hope of it arriving locally before 2027.“We wanted to focus on delivering the customer deliveries we've had, rather than introducing a new model just for the sake of it,” he said.“So, we are in the process of getting through that backlog of customer orders, and our plan is to go into production again, assuming everything lines up with customer deliveries. Currently, (we’re in production week) 48 this year, which means that (by approximately) March next year, we should have (Elroq RS) to market.“And we’re really excited about it.”Drilling down in the Elroq RS’ standout features, the dual electric motors make 250kW of power and 697Nm of torque, enabling a 0-100km/h sprint time of a tidy 5.4 seconds.Along with faster charging capabilities and bigger brake calipers, the Elroq RS boasts a body kit, unique front and rear bumpers, special 21-inch alloy wheels, additional LED headlight elements, bolder colour choices, glossier body trim, RS sports seats with driver’s side memory, carbon-look dash material, stainless steel pedal covers, suede style upholstery covering for the dash, door cards, seating and elsewhere.

Premium electrified people movers are growing in popularity, propelled by the VW ID. Buzz EV, as well as Chinese brands like Zeekr and Denza. The XPeng X9 is the latest, with comparatively keen pricing, a huge list of standard features and impressively advanced tech, including air suspension. Great on paper, but we have doubts on some fronts, given our experiences with the Performance AWD model.

The model poised to be Skoda’s best-seller in Australia next year has improved, with better safety, more practicality and an expanded range topped by the return of the higher-performance RS flagship.On sale now from $51,990 (all prices are before on-road costs), as before, the Czechian mid-sized SUV EV kicks off with the Select 60 rear-wheel drive (RWD) in SUV Wagon-only guise, leaving the swoopier Enyaq Coupe SUV models reserved only for higher grades from Sportline 85 (from $60,990-Wagon/$66,990-Coupe) and up for now.That’s a $1000 jump compared to when it arrived in Australia late last year, though the changes do run deeper than usual for a model-year refresh.They include upgraded autonomous emergency braking (AEB) functionality, as part of upgraded advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) technologies, with new cross-road assist bringing lateral on-coming vehicle detection and braking, broader single-pedal driving with full-stopping capability, and traffic sign recognition.On the practicality front, the Enyaq now scores a 21-litre storage enclosure underneath the bonnet (also known as a frunk in Tesla-speak), a revised Android multimedia set-up offering short cuts among other advances, and a 25-watt Mag Safe wireless smartphone charger.As outlined earlier this year, the Enyaq RS returns, in new SUV Wagon form from $76,590, as well as returning SUV Coupe shape for $1000 extra.Dubbed the most powerful production Skoda ever offered in Australia, power and torque are rated at 250kW and 545Nm respectively. A motor on each axle brings all-wheel drive, allowing for a 0-100km/h sprint-time of 5.4 seconds on the way to a 180km/h top speed.On the efficiency front, RS’ combined WLTP range is 546km for the Wagon and 11km more in the more-slippery Coupe.It also features a 2kWh-larger battery pack compared to the mid-range 85 Sportline’s 82kWh alternative, while the base 60 Select sticks with a 61kWh item.Further upgrades include the addition of the Volkswagen Group’s Dynamic Chassis Control tech, offering adaptive dampers, dedicated drive modes with an individualisation setting and 21-inch wheels.You’ll be able to spot the RS from lowlier Enyaqs by their unique alloys, body kit, reshaped bumpers, glossier trim and additional colour options on the outside, and racier trim, leather sports seats with heating and ventilation up front, upgraded audio, fatter steering wheel rim and augmented reality head-up display inside.It’s worth noting that the Enyaq SUV Coupe’s 570-litre cargo capacity is just 15L shy of the SUV Wagon’s, though with rear-seats down, that gap is 100L at 1610L versus 1710L.

An unexpected carmaker is poised to achieve a historic first in Australia and it may happen as soon as next year.In a first for a legacy – or long-established – carmaker of volume, Skoda is set to have its best seller switch from an internal combustion engine (ICE) model to an electric vehicle (EV).This will beat out other much larger manufacturers to the punch in this country like Toyota, Nissan and Hyundai.Speaking to the Australian press at a snow/ice-driving event near Queenstown in New Zealand, Skoda Australia Brand Director, Lucie Kuhn, revealed that the Enyaq mid-sized SUV is closing in fast on the venerable Kodiaq seven-seater large SUV for the firm's number one slot.“The Kodiaq still remains our best-selling (vehicle),” she said.“But I’m quite sure Enyaq will join it on stage in this electric era, and we will most likely have two heroes… (Skoda is currently) selling 700 units together year-to-date.”Pitch-perfect timing has played a big role in the rise of the European EV, not just in Australia, but also in many other parts of the world, with Skoda essentially relaunching the Enyaq at facelift time to appeal to a wider audience than before.For Australia, that happened when the extensively upgraded Series II models arrived near the end of last year, brandishing a broader model range as well as a long list of improvements.Among these has been the addition of a more conventional SUV Wagon shape to the earlier, higher-spec-only SUV Coupe series.Along with providing a more practical and some say prettier alternative, that also included the arrival of a new entry-level grade with a smaller battery known as the 60 Select, which started from around $55,000 drive-away.Aided by the closely related Elroq EV, which is essentially an Enyaq but with a shorter rear overhang for a more-compact SUV-style appearance, the order influx that Skoda has experienced since the beginning of the Middle Eastern war in March caught it short on stock.In fact, that record could have been broken this year had production supply kept up with demand for the company’s EVs.“(Our sales in Australia) would have been more if we had a better supply of EVs during the little surprises dating from March to June, let’s say,” Kuhn revealed.“It would definitely have been better than last year overall and better than (today’s) numbers.”Kuhn added that, in the second quarter of this year when oil prices spiked to record-highs, the order banks for its two EVs ran as high as 80 per cent, though that has since settled to around 45 per cent.However, the continuing geo-political uncertainty means that demand for electric Skodas may skyrocket soon.“I think every brand that has a mixed portfolio (of ICE and EVs) faced this customer behaviour changes,” Kuhn explained.“The same of course, applies for us, particularly during the period of March to June, let's say, when our EV share boomed up to 80 percent almost, which, of course, caused empty stocks and longer waiting times for fresh production (of EVs).“Now it's stabilising across the industry, and it's stabilising also for Skoda.“So currently we are around 40 to 45 per cent.”Skoda will double the number of EVs it sells in Australia from next year.Already confirmed is the Epiq, which will be its cheapest ever EV in this country (and likely a brand best-seller contender), as well as the Peaq seven-seater SUV, earmarked by 2028. 

As with its Hyundai Tucson cousin, the last two generations of Kia Sportage have long been good cars in search of better petrol powertrains.The old 2.0-litre atmo unit lacked spark and the 1.6-litre turbo was too highly strung for a family runabout.The petrol-electric hybrid vehicle (HEV) that usurps both, on the other hand, strikes the right chord, but wasn’t available in base guise – until now.The entry-level S Hybrid, from $44,490, drive-away, puts the base Sportage right in the Chinese electrified mid-sized SUV heartland.Inevitably, several plug-in hybrid (PHEV) rivals cost less and yet bring more equipment, like the BYD Sealion 5, Chery Tiggo 7, Geely Starray and Jaecoo J7. But cheapness is their main attraction and most suffer from some worrying deficiencies.Oddly, though, the S overlaps with some hybrid-only alternatives from China, like the GWM Haval H6 and MG HS, though again, both require more development.The Kia undercuts Japanese base-grade hybrid equivalents, such as the Nissan X-Trail e-Power, Honda CR-V e:HEV and, of course, the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid that begins from about $6000 more.That said, the S isn’t scant on spec, with much of the expected convenience basics, like climate control, a reversing camera, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and alloy wheels.You’ll also find:A space-saver spare wheel – thank you, KiaSeven years of free Kia Connect remote app services accessKeyless entry and startA 12.3-inch touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android AutoAdaptive cruise controlFront and rear parking sensorsIn other words, all you need and a bit more besides. There’s no wireless phone charger or heated front seats at this price point, though.Now in its fifth generation since 1993, today’s Sportage has been an especially strong seller worldwide.Maybe that’s why last year’s facelift is subtle. An obvious difference is the removal of the fussy inverted ‘V’ LED lighting up front, connecting the mid-sized SUV to some of its younger SUV siblings.Similarly, the Sportage’s cabin presentation has also weathered well.At first glance, you’d be hard pressed to pick this as the entry-level Sportage.Yes, the seats are cloth instead of modish synthetic leather (though vinyl belongs in record sleeves not in SUVs) and the driver’s side lacks lumbar adjustment. But these are the only real concessions to cost cutting.Dominating things is Kia’s classy, curved dual-display dash, which remains visually contemporary and operates smartly, swiftly and smoothly, while a row of fixed virtual buttons below responds on the first touch and are paragons of clarity. China (and Mazda CX-5), please heed, since the Hyundai Motor Group knows how to balance dashboard design and ergonomics effectively.The front seats provide adequate comfort and support, the driving position is faultless, the ventilation works fine, there is an abundance of storage and the quality of execution stands out.As with the spacious front row, back-seat entry and egress is effortless. The Sportage’s roomy rear features cushions are fixed, but remain adequately comfy, aided by backrests that recline a little. Also present are air vents, cupholders, USB-C ports and a folding armrest. Not bad for a base bus.Further back, even with the spare wheel, VDA luggage capacity is a decent 586 litres, expanding to 1872L with the 60/40 split-fold backrests dropped. Electrification need not compromise practicality.The S Hybrid 2WD uses a 132kW/265Nm 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol hybrid engine, paired to a 47.7kW/264Nm electric motor, driving the front wheels via a six-speed torque-converter automatic.Combined outputs are 173kW and 367Nm, while a 1.49kWh lithium-ion battery is located by the multi-link rear axle.The result is remarkably velvety performance, from stepping off the line in EV-first mode, to maintaining a strong and steady pace at speed once the internal-combustion engine seamlessly pipes in.A world away from the wheezy old 2.0L unit, the Sportage is especially adept at delivering immediate, muscular throttle response, especially in Sport mode, for satisfyingly instant overtaking, though it’s also refined enough to be licence-losingly rapid even before the driver notices. Beware.This fluid ease also describes the handling set-up, with engagingly linear steering for quick yet controlled cornering capabilities aided by finely calibrated brakes (not always a given in hybrids).While not as supple as, say, the latest CX-5’s, the S Hybrid's suspension tune remains acceptably firm. And, save for the tiring speed-sign warnings, the ADAS tech is sufficiently calibrated for Australian roads. Again, not a given nowadays.Fixes for the next model should include grippier tyres than what the Nexen Roadian rubber provide in the wet and a tighter turning circle.Still, the S Hybrid shows that the Sportage has evolved and matured remarkably. A far cry from the dynamic calamity of the earliest generations.Pump-to-pump, we averaged 5.8 litres per 100km over a week’s worth of often-spirited inner-urban, freeway and performance-testing driving, against 5.2L/100km on the trip computer and Kia’s claim of 4.9L/100km.In theory, the Hybrid 2WD is capable of 1060km between refills of (91 RON standard) petrol.Finally, tested back in 2022, the Sportage garnered a maximum five-star ANCAP rating, largely for “good” occupant protection.The long role call of ADAS tech includes multi-faceted autonomous emergency braking (AEB) and lane-support systems, blind-spot collision-avoidance assist and safe exit warning.Meanwhile, there’s a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and up to eight years of roadside assistance if serviced at Kia. Intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km.Capped-price servicing is listed at $353, $561, $422, $880, $397, $703 and $716 over the first seven years, totalling $4032. That’s $1185 more than the albeit-$6K-costlier base RAV4 over the same period.

Skoda has indicated two key SUV electric vehicles (EVs) slated for Australia may have their release dates pushed back.With booming demand for EVs in Europe against a backdrop of war in the Middle East and subsequent spiking oil prices, buyers in Australia may have to wait until the end of next year before they can get behind the wheel of the Epiq small SUV.Likewise, the recently announced Skoda Peaq seven-seater large SUV EV, a companion model to the popular Kodiaq and the stated flagship – or peak – of the Czechian brand’s extensive range, might still be up to two years away from a local launch.According to Skoda Australia Brand Director, Lucie Kuhn, there are a number of factors at play putting pressure on the availability of these two important electric models.“Here in Australia, we are trying to fight to get the launch of global models, the Epiq and Peaq,” she said. “We are awaiting final confirmation.”With sales of EVs expected to eclipse internal combustion engine models for Skoda in Australia, the importance of the Epiq in particular cannot be overstated.Closely related to the just-released VW ID. Polo light car supermini and ID. Cross electric crossover version that are already creating a buzz with strong pre-orders in Europe, it is a key player in the Volkswagen Group’s retaliation against the wave of cheap EVs from China.More specifically, the Epiq uses a modified version of the MEB electrical architecture known as MEB+ designed to slash engineering and production costs.Developed by Seat in Spain (where all models including a Cupra Raval version will be built), it switches from a rear-motor/rear-wheel-drive (RWD) configuration to a front-motor/front-drive layout.Along with a simpler torsion beam rear suspension set-up and the choice of two modestly sized battery packs of 39kWh (for 310km of WLTP range) and 55kWh (for about 440km WLTP) sizes, the goal here is to save money.Speaking of which, while pricing and specification details have yet to confirmed for our market, the entry-level version is expected to kick off from somewhere in the mid-$30,000 region.This would take the fight up to the BYD Atto 2, GWM Ora 5, Jaecoo J5, Leapmotor B10 and Chery E5.Crucially, at the time of publishing, neither VW has been confirmed for Australia as yet.The Peaq, meanwhile, employs a stretched version of the Enyaq’s MEB architecture, and will offer 60 RWD, 90 RWD and 90X all-wheel drive powertrains.Globally unveiled in late June, Skoda has yet to reveal many details about this model, but it is anticipated that the main target will be the successful Tesla Model Y L, which currently retails from around $75,000 and $90,000 before on-road costs in Australia.If the brand can achieve similar pricing to the latter, it would undercut a host of electric alternatives, including the Kia EV9, Volvo EX90, Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Mercedes-Benz EQS.Both models represent strong opportunities for conquest sales for the company.“We are hard at work now, working on Epiq and Peaq,” according to Skoda Australia Head of Product and Marketing, Kieran Merrigan.“The feedback is really awesome, and we can't wait to see the work on them and bring them to market – 2027 for the Epiq, and then late 2027 or 2028 for the Peaq.”

Nowadays, Australia may host more car brands than ever before, but we miss out on some very cool models.That’s because of a uniquely regional Australian Design Rule (ADR) requirement that can cost upwards of $5 million to implement for each series.Known as ADR 34/03, it stipulates that three top tether anchorage points must be fitted across each rear-seat position. But it can also create years of delays and blow out business cases due to the subsequent expenses involved.Probably the most disappointing recent example has been the Renault 5 E-Tech.Wooing buyers and critics alike, this award-winning electric vehicle (EV) hatchback has been a smash hit in Europe, melding desirable retro design with cutting-edge yet affordable tech.However, as CarsGuide outlined earlier this year, Renault importer Ateco Automotive may not even bother releasing the 5 E-Tech into Australia because it cannot afford the extra millions necessary for it to comply with ADR 34/03. The maths just doesn’t add up. Such a pity.The same also applies to the Renault 4 E-Tech, a larger and more crossover-style EV wagon that, though not as racy as its closely related 5 E-Tech sibling, possesses family friendly packaging that might make it a more-practical proposition.But all is not lost.Unlike the 5 E-Tech which, despite its diminutive supermini proportions, is only available as a full-fledged five-seater hatch, the 4 E-Tech can be ordered as a two-seater panel van dubbed the Société Van that ditches the back row.Since this eliminates the need to comply with ADR 34/03, it begs the question: why can’t Ateco simply import the 4 E-Tech Société as a commercial vehicle? Post-sale, owners could then add a rear seat if desired, fitted to specification by a vehicle engineering firm in Australia.This was widely done in the 1980s, notably with smaller Japanese cars like the Suzuki 800 hatch (1980), Daihatsu Handivan (1981) and Honda City (1984). Each one was only officially imported as a two-seater van.However, according to Renault Australia General Manager, Glen Sealey, importing the 4 E-Tech Société is unlikely, given the extreme niche that passenger-car-based vans would occupy, adding that the Kangoo commercial vehicle broadly fills a similar role.“We haven't looked at that as a solution, because for us, we've got the Kangoo,” he told CarsGuide at the Renault Master large van launch in Sydney last month.“And that small panel van passenger car market is negligible (in size) … it would be higher cost, for low reward.”This is in spite of the wider Renault brand portfolio actually already offering a number of car-based panel vans in right-hand-drive (RHD) Ireland.“That RHD European market does utilise a typical passenger vehicle for (small panel van) commercial use,” Sealey said.“They do it in the Duster (small SUV). They do with the Sandero (small car). They do it with Megane E-Tech.”Sealey added that companies, not individuals, are buying electric vans in Australia, and they would not go for passenger-car-derived alternatives, that tend to attract individuals running small businesses.“The tradie is not buying electric,” he said. The corporate market is, and the corporate market is buying a larger van.”