Articles by Byron Mathioudakis

Byron Mathioudakis
Contributing Journalist

Byron started his motoring journalism career when he joined John Mellor in 1997 before becoming a freelance motoring writer two years later.

He wrote for several motoring publications and was ABC Youth radio Triple J's "all things automotive" correspondent from 2001 to 2003.

He rejoined John Mellor in early 2003 and has been with GoAutoMedia as a senior product and industry journalist ever since.

With an eye for detail and a vast knowledge base of both new and used cars Byron lives and breathes motoring.

His encyclopedic knowledge of cars was acquired from childhood by reading just about every issue of every car magazine ever to hit a newsstand in Australia.

The child Byron was the consummate car spotter, devoured and collected anything written about cars that he could lay his hands on and by nine had driven more imaginary miles at the wheel of the family Ford Falcon in the driveway at home than many people drive in a lifetime.

The teenage Byron filled in the agonising years leading up to getting his driver's license by reading the words of the leading motoring editors of the country and learning what they look for in a car and how to write it.

In short, Byron loves cars and knows pretty much all there is to know about every vehicle released during his lifetime as well as most of the ones that were around before then.

Kia Stonic 2026 review: Sport
By Byron Mathioudakis · 14 Mar 2026
Sporty small SUVs are pretty thin on the ground lately. The criminally-underrated Ford Puma vanished years ago, the sophisticated Renault Captur is AWOL and the athletic Mazda CX-3 is 11 and counting.But three terrific little newcomers from last year are vying for a spot on the keen driver’s podium.Mahindra’s plucky XUV 3XO is a steal at $24,000, drive-away. There’s the spirited Renault Captur-cloned Mitsubishi ASX from (gulp!) $40K, drive-away. And this - the facelifted Kia Stonic. Sitting pretty in-between from $30K, drive-away, is this the Goldilocks zone of sporty small SUVs?Calling the MY26 Stonic ‘new’ is a stretch, given it’s based on the 2017 German-designed, Rio supermini-based original, with a fresh nose, tail-light and bumper treatments.While that Rio connection is central to the littlest Kia SUV’s urban appeal, the upright proportions and 165mm ground clearance promote easy access to the cabin.The Stonic’s revamped interior certainly drags it up to date, with a classy dashboard redesign that adopts the modish rectangular electronic screen look, housing a pair of varying displays for instrumentation and multimedia, according to how much you’re prepared to pay.The mid-spec Sport, from $34,490, drive-away (or $32,290 before on-road costs), seems to be the sweet spot of the Stonic ensemble.Building on the base S’s keyless entry/start, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, power folding/heated mirrors, reversing camera, front and rear parking sensors, roof rails and 16-inch alloy wheels, the Sport adds an inch-larger wheels, climate control, rain-sensing wipers, adaptive cruise control as part of a wider list of advanced driver-assist safety (ADAS) tech, extra USB-C ports, privacy glass and a larger (from 8.0-inch to 12.3-inch) multimedia screen. A worthwhile upgrade.The Sport also scores inbuilt sat-nav, but at the cost of requiring wired CarPlay, the result of a silly feud with Apple, allegedly. Still, the dash’s look and layout are as modern and slick as any rival from China.Actually, better than most, since the Stonic maintains its clear and easy-to-navigate screen presentation, but adds quality, tactile buttons, knobs and controls that are designed to not distract the driver.Other plus points include ample cabin space up front, an excellent driving position, supportive front seats, good all-around vision, lots of storage, effective climate control and decent noise-suppression abilities, endearing us to the South Korean crossover.The Stonic’s back seat is tight for larger folk, and a bit basic overall. While the boot area is decently shaped, there’s only 352 litres of cargo capacity, extending to 1155L with the 60/40 split-fold backrests dropped. Below the class average, this betrays the Rio connection.And while we’re whining, where is the spare wheel? A tyre-repair kit is inadequate for Australia. Perhaps the optimistic ‘mild-hybrid’ specification gave Kia license to lose the fifth wheel?Under the bonnet is an 88kW/172Nm 1.0-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol engine, driving the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT) only.But for one important way, this is a very modern European powertrain in the Volkswagen, Renault, Ford tradition. Petite, peaky and parsimonious.A muted thrum gives the Stonic a pleasing rasp as those sweet little revs rise. Acceleration feels adequate and nothing more in 'Eco' mode, but the engine and DCT software in 'Normal' and 'Sport' seem to extend each ratio’s lung capacity, for noticeably punchier performance and more-eager throttle response. A 10.8-second 0-100km/h claim feels conservative.But here’s where the Stonic really earns its sporty small SUV stripes, because the chassis set-up (complete with an Australian-road tuning) is slightly biased towards firmness, but not to the detriment of ride comfort.Combined with a light yet alert steering set-up, handling is precise, planted and in control, encouraging a keener driver to go faster and give it more if the conditions align. Quality Continental rubber helps here, too.It’s such a shame Kia ignores the six-speed manual version, for an even higher degree of driver interaction.Back in the urban jungle, the Stonic does a fine job traversing bumps big and small, and while there is some suppleness to the suspension (struts up front, a torsion beam out back), sometimes a bit more damper travel would be nice.Fitted with stop-start and a 48-volt mild-hybrid system that feeds regenerative brake energy back into the electrical system to help save fuel, the Kia returns an impressive 5.0 litres per 100km (combined cycle, AS 81/02) for a corresponding carbon dioxide emissions rating of just 116 grams/km. That’s about 900km between refills.All familiar European fare. Where the Stonic diverges is its tolerance for regular 91 RON petrol and E10, which is a bonus.No ANCAP rating exists, though the 2017 original scored a maximum five stars, but that would be unlikely despite autonomous emergency braking (AEB), lane keep assist and blind-spot monitoring, since rear-cross traffic alert and reverse automatic braking are absent. The Sport and GT-Line have collision-mitigation tech when turning at an intersection.Finally, Kia’s seven-year, unlimited kilometre warranty applies. Better than average, not the best.
Read the article
Why the new Mitsubishi ASX is the best ever
By Byron Mathioudakis · 09 Mar 2026
Late last year marked two significant milestones in the history of Mitsubishi Motors Australia Limited (MMAL).Firstly, it celebrated 45years as the entity that took over the failing Chrysler Australia Limited, including all the manufacturing facilities, in October, 1980,And secondly, with the latest ASX from France arriving as the belated replacement for the 15-year-old previous version that new Australian Design Rules forced off the market by the end of 2024, it signalled the end of the pure Mitsubishi passenger car in Australia.In both cases, a car supplied by somebody else saved the day. By the late 1970s, the Sigma by Mitsubishi kept Chrysler afloat after the latter’s Valiant large car’s sales plummeted, while nowadays MMAL’s best-seller is derived from the Nissan X-Trail platform (and petrol powertrain).From here on in, every model bar the Triton ute and its coming Pajero Sport-replacing SUV off-shoot is based on cars from another manufacturer that remain rivals in the marketplace.It’s worth noting of course that Nissan in Australia and New Zealand is using a lightly-modified Triton as the Navara replacement from this month, so the model sharing does go both ways.But, is this development such a bad thing?How many of the now-discontinued Mitsubishi-only models were worthy of a brand behind bona fide classics like the Lancer GSR Turbo, Magna family car, Starion sports coupe and full-sized Pajero 4WD?These were all ambitious, innovative, highly-engineered and beloved icons that helped change the face of motoring. In contrast, some of the diamond brand’s latter offerings – hello LA Mirage – merely served as the face of mediocrity.Let’s list each of the new-age Mitsubishis, sold here as well as globally, to see whether the switch to out-sourcing has resulted in better or worse passenger cars for consumers as a result.The 2026 ASX is the first Mitsubishi rebadge job sold in Australia, being a lightly-facelifted version of the pre-facelift second-generation Renault Captur (that is, by the way, currently off-sale here and there’s no sign of the MY25 Series II version of the French car).But the Euro newcomer has very, very big shoes to fill, given that the previous ASX became a huge hit (after a slow start back in 2010) in the emerging small SUV segment that it ultimately helped establish.Don’t get us wrong. In its early days, the ASX was a capable yet easy to handle urban crossover with efficient powertrains and a sufficiently spacious interior that ably served as a second family car.But successive facelifts and obvious cost-cutting measures diluted an ageing architecture derived from the 2007 Lancer, meaning it ended up as a cheap, dull and dated proposition by its 10 birthday. Only low prices and a long warranty helped prop up the old timer.In contrast, the Captur-derived version possesses the verve, spark and flair of the Clio supermini that sired it, making it one of today’s better small SUVs.That the French ASX comes with the peace-of-mind of a conditional 10-year warranty means this a smart ticket to sophisticated European SUV ownership, and without the high maintenance costs to boot. An absolutely terrific buy!Since 2022, the current Outlander mid-sized SUV has shared its CMF-CD architecture and PR25DD petrol engine with today’s fine Nissan T33 X-Trail.But this is not more-widely known or acknowledged. At least Mitsubishi in Japan completely redesigned the body and cabin, meaning that you would never know the connection – even from behind the wheel, since the fourth generation to wear the badge feels and behaves differently.Plus, the massive interior’s family-friendly practicality and optional (and pioneering) plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) powertrain further add some of that old-time Mitsubishi innovation.Sure, the petrol models are in no way sporty or sophisticated to drive, but at least this Outlander delivers exactly what the badges on its big posterior promise.And the latest version is a whole lot better to drive and sit inside than the dreary and unrefined previous one. We call this another win for buyers.Still listed on Mitsubishi’s website today, despite being officially discontinued at the end of 2024, the old Eclipse Cross was meant to replace the previous ASX back in about 2017, before the latter’s unforeseen mid-life sales rally forced the struggling brand to keep it in production.This also explains why the cash-strapped company offered two different yet near-identically-sized small SUVs, even down to sharing – along with the previous Outlander – an identical 2670mm wheelbase and ageing 2007 Lancer-based platform.At least Mitsubishi bothered to introduce a new powertrain in the Eclipse Cross – a smooth yet gutsy 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol engine, bypassing the tired old 2.0-litre and 2.4-litre “World Engine” units co-developed with Chrysler and Hyundai during the mid-2000s.Still, with so much SUV overlap and awkward styling, the sales of the old Eclipse Cross never lived up to expectations.But the nameplate, which has roots to the US-market Eclipse sports coupe of the late ‘80s, lives on in Europe, adorning the rear of a re-badged Renault Megane E-Tech electric vehicle.Given that is widely regarded as one of the world’s better EVs, this a loss for local Mitsubishi fans since Australia is not getting it any time soon, but a big win for European Eclipse Cross buyers.For older Australians, the Colt name conjures up memories of a Toyota Corolla-rivalling 1980s hatchback with neat styling and a bizarre eight-speed manual Super Shift gearbox. Yep, look it up, kids.That had been badged as the Mirage in Japan since 1978, and went on to evolve into six generations of Lancer small cars from 1983, with Australia finally granted the Mirage for the CE series from 1996-2004. This went on to become of the most acclaimed Mitsubishis ever sold here.Exhuming the Colt badge, its replacement was a boxier, taller supermini in the vein of the Mercedes A-Class, with excellent packaging and sophisticated engineering.So, you can imagine the indignation when the Mirage name returned from 2012 on a cheap city car that was designed for low-cost accessibility and lightest-possible weight. Commendable in theory, in execution this was as loud and unrefined as its predecessor was calm and refined. Regularly starring in worst-car listings, its only legacy is proving that a low price does not equal high value.The 2026 Colt, on the other hand, is derived from the Renault Clio, which remains one of the sweetest European superminis the world has ever known. We’d love to see it in Australia with the backing of MMAL.Derived from an extended version of the Renault Captur known as the Symbioz, the 2026 Grandis is a small-ish medium-sized SUV in the mould of the Kia Seltos, complete with hybrid tech.That name though. Grandis will forever be associated with Mitsubishi’s take on the Toyota Tarago-dominated people-mover scene of some 20 years ago in Australia.While there is a gaping hole in MMAL’s local SUV line-up between ASX and Outlander, the latest Grandis is not quite the right fit, being too small to lure buyers away from the Toyota RAV4 heartland.A larger, Nissan Qashqai-derived crossover may be on the cards sometime in the future. Renault already sells a version of that in Europe as the Austral – a model ironically not slated for Australia.
Read the article
Subaru Brumby to return with Toyota's help?
By Byron Mathioudakis · 07 Mar 2026
Subaru has confirmed that it is investigating different avenues back into the ute market, as the eternal search for a worthy successor to the now-legendary Brumby/BRAT of nearly half a century ago continues.However, while yet another collaboration with Toyota is likely given the latter’s 20 per cent stake in the Subaru Corporation, a version of the recently-redesigned Toyota HiLux has been ruled out.According to Subaru Australia General Manager, Scott Lawrence, there is no current or planned discussion around Toyota’s existing ute out of Thailand for one very important reason.“It's a common question, both from journalists and particularly regional areas online,” he told CarsGuide with a sigh at the recent launch of the seventh-generation Subaru Outback.“It is an interesting proposition. What I would say is we need to do what's right by the brand. And many people would say, ‘grab a HiLux, you know, and talk to Toyota about a co-brand,’ as if it was that easy.“But I don't even know if that is right for the brand.”Lawrence reckons there needs to be considerable planning, design and engineering input from both parties right from the very beginning, leaning on each of their respective strengths and experiences, for any tie-up to work successfully.This has not been the case for the current-generation of HiLux, which is a substantial facelift of the previous iteration launched all the way back in 2015.“With the collaborations between Toyota and Subaru, in fact, all brand collaborations, need to be equal,” he believes.“It needs to be input from both sides. Subaru has got great experience in building awesome cars with capability, and Brumbys comes to mind as one that you still see driving on the roads today.“There is discussion around Subaru Corporation as what that looks like in the 2020s, so it is a live discussion. Would I love a commercial ute? Yes, but it needs to be right. It needs to be Subaru.“So, the ultimate question of a co-brand collaboration, of course there are always discussions. But, I think that the big question is, what is Subaru’s territory in the commercial space? And there's lots of exciting discussions going on, but nothing, nothing is shared at this point.”Asked if the rumoured dual-cab ute based on the next-generation version of the Toyota Corolla Cross or coming Toyota RAV4 redesign is a perfect project for such a collaboration (and basis for a future Subaru Brumby), Lawrence was a little bit less forthcoming.“So, the question is, do I see a future for a monocoque style ute?” he said.“That is a really fun conversation and discussion, of ladder-frame versus monocoque. There is the Ford Maverick in the US, of course. (But that is) a much smaller segment, with very few players in that space.“That is a discussion. That is a discussion, yeah. But again, there is nothing more I can share in that space.”So, no chance of a rebadged Toyota HiLux – at least not in the current iteration.And possibly a collaboration on a monocoque-bodied dual-cab ute in the vein of the Ford Maverick, shared with Toyota, and possibly based on either a Subaru Global Platform or Toyota New Global Architecture toolset as per the Toyota Corolla Cross successor.Surely that would be the closest we would get to a modern-day Subaru Brumby!Watch this space.
Read the article
Nissan X-Trail 2026 review: Ti-L e-Power
By Byron Mathioudakis · 05 Mar 2026
For 25 years and four generations, the Nissan X-Trail has been an okay mid-sized SUV choice. But the e-Power extended-range electric vehicle hybrid has been a standout since arriving in 2023. Fast, refined, sophisticated and fun, it redefined class standards, though buyers were slow to realise. Now, a minor facelift brings improvements, but are they enough for the Nissan to finally break through?
Read the article
The sub-$20k car returns to Oz with a catch
By Byron Mathioudakis · 05 Mar 2026
$19,990 drive-away is back! The sub-$20,000 barrier has been breached by a popular new model in Australia, bucking a long-term trend of continuous price hikes.More importantly, and in a first since the Suzuki Swift jumped well beyond $21,000 at the beginning of this decade, the car in question is not based on an older or outmoded design nearing the end of its lifecycle, but something released relatively recently as an all-new proposition.That model, inevitably, is the latest iteration of the second-generation MG3, which has already seen a couple of price cuts since the entry-level Vibe CVT automatic grade arrived in Australia during the second half of last year.Initially set at $21,990 drive-away, it dropped by $1000 last month, but is now retailing at $19,990 drive-away until the end of March.However, this latest price is conditional, since it comes with the proviso that is highly unusual at a national retail level - that a member of the buyer’s family must be, or have been, an owner of an MG vehicle.Snappily branded as the “MG Family $1,000 Off” campaign, an MG dealer told CarsGuide that it “includes existing and previous owners and their immediate families, taking in spouses, children (including step/adopted ones) and parents.”Whether previous family ownership extends to the pre-Chinese ownership era of MG Rover models from before 2005, like the ZT, ZS and ZR, as well as the TF and MGF roadsters of the ‘90s, could not be confirmed.In some cases, proof may also be required before the $19,990 drive-away price can be applied at the point of sale – otherwise the Vibe CVT grade returns to the standard $20,990 drive-away.Furthermore, the sub-$20K pricing applies only to new (so not demonstrator) MY25.5 MG3s (so already built and presumably landed in Australia), and in white or black and with a black interior, and while stocks last. They must be sold and delivered to the customer by March 31, 2026, and excludes fleet, government and rental buyers.The real significance of this is the fact that, unlike the previous first-generation MG3 that first entered production all the way back in 2011, the newer (ZP22) version only dates back to 2024.This means it has significantly more safety features, including autonomous emergency braking (AEB) and some advanced driver-assist system (ADAS) technologies.As we said earlier, this hasn’t been the case since the contemporary Swift jumped in price during 2021.And while the MG3 currently has a four-star crash-test rating with ANCAP, its nearest competitor on price, the one-segment-size-down Kia Picanto, remains untested.Note, too, that, even at $20,990 drive-away, the MG3 Vibe CVT is by some margin currently the cheapest new vehicle in Australia, undercutting the base Picanto Sport manual at $22,140 drive-away by over $1100, and $2250 for the auto version that is the more-appropriate point of comparison.Well specified, the Vibe CVT is powered by an 81kW/142Nm 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine, driving the front wheels via a CVT continuously variable transmission.Standard features include 15-inch steel wheels, cloth upholstery, a reversing camera, a 10.25-inch touchscreen display, Apple CarPlay/Android Auto connectivity, adaptive cruise control, AEB, blind spot monitoring, lane departure warning/assist, rear cross-traffic alert, speed sign recognition and a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty (like Kia’s), but increased to a 10-year/250,000km conditional guarantee of serviced at an MG dealer.
Read the article
Subaru Ascent looms to take on Kluger
By Byron Mathioudakis · 04 Mar 2026
Subaru is seeking to re-enter the three-row SUV segment in Australia in the near future, after more than a dozen years away from the scene.
Read the article
Subaru Outback Wilderness Apex 2026 review: snapshot
By Byron Mathioudakis · 28 Feb 2026
The 2026 Subaru Outback Wilderness Apex is just that – the flagship version of the seventh-generation series.
Read the article
Holden VL Commodore turns 40!
By Byron Mathioudakis · 28 Feb 2026
This month marks the 40 anniversary of the launch of the Holden VL Commodore in Australia.The fifth and final iteration of the original, German Opel Rekord E-derived (and ultimately HZ Kingswood-usurping) VB Commodore series released back in October 1978, it ranks alongside the most revered Holdens ever.Now a cultural phenomenon, it’s become, to Gen Xers and Millennials mainly, what the 1963 EH is to Baby Boomers. Peak Holden. Here's why.The most changed Commodore to dateThat 1970s-era VB changed little through its VC (1980), VH (1981) and VK (1984) facelifts, though the latter did adopt an extra side window, plastic bumpers and truly ugly square instruments to set it apart.Frankly, buyers became bored, rivals were trying harder and sales were in a worrying downward spiral.Stylistically, then, the VL’s strikingly low, sloping bonnet, featuring slimmer yet far-more effective headlights, seemed almost revolutionary compared to any previous Commodore.Inspired by the mid-sized JD Camira’s facelift of 1984, they also provided a welcome change after seven years of samey front-end design themes. The flagship Calais, meanwhile, added pop-up light covers for dramatic visual demarcation. How Eighties is that?And while the mid-body and cabin sections carried through from the preceding VK, save for a tacky rehash of the upper-dash architecture and refurbished seats in Calais, further back, a small kick-up at the trailing edge of the boot lid gave the sedans a distinctive duck-tail silhouette, for a five-per-cent aero improvement. The wagon, meanwhile, made do with a bumper that merely hung back there like a full nappy. Never mind.But the VL’s defining change lurked underneath the bonnet.Breaking with traditionWildly controversial leading up to the launch, to meet unleaded petrol requirements, the VL ditched Holden’s venerable 3.3-litre overhead-valve iron-block in-line six-cylinder (I6) Black petrol engine (in 86kW carburettor and 106kW fuel-injection guises), for Nissan’s more-advanced 114kW 3.0-litre overhead-cam RB30E, which also debuted soon after in the locally made R31 Skyline.Remember when they actually made Skylines in Australia?Dubbed Powertech 6Ei and imported from Japan, it was 33 per cent more powerful yet 15 per cent more economical than the previous 3.3 base, bringing with it a GM-H-first electronic four-speed auto.Fitting the Nissan I6 in “Australia’s Own” was seen as a betrayal amongst some loyalists, politicians and unionists (since the switch meant a Holden engine factory closed), though it quickly became the literal heart of the VL’s enduring appeal.Especially the cop-car-favourite 150kW RB30ET turbocharged option that followed from July, which even blitzed the 122kW 4.9-litre V8 (an unleaded revamp of the 1969-vintage original still stuck with a three-speed auto option) – as well as anything arch rival and market-leader Ford bothered to muster.Perhaps that’s why the contemporary XF Falcon generally commands a fraction of this-era Commodore’s resale values. Burn!Too little, too late, for GM-HYet, for all intents and purposes, the VL helped end General-Motors-Holden’s (GM-H) as we knew it.Firstly, the Commodore failed to reel in the high-flying Falcon, which was comfortably Australia’s most popular car at the time, owning some 15 per cent of the total vehicle market at its peak. Though more popular with private buyers, only once, in April 1986, did the VL hit the top spot, and only by three units. The end-of-year tally was nearly 55,000 versus over 66,000 registrations. The 1987 results were worse: 53,000 against nearly 70,000, in the XF’s favour.Fleet buyers preferred the visibly-wider (by nearly 140mm) Falcon over Commodore because of the former’s greater size, perceived higher-quality interior (Holden’s build quality was dreadful) and more-predictable road manners. No doubt Ford’s brilliant marketing helped, too.Secondly, the VL also suffered at the hands of an increasingly more-aggressive Mitsubishi, which burst back into the large-car segment in 1985, after a four-year absence following the end of the ancient Chrysler Valiant it inherited, with the innovative, wide-bodied Magna – the first of its kind among medium-sized cars anywhere in the world.A massive hit, the latter embarrassed the VL for interior space and set new local standards in refinement, and continued to challenge Holden and Falcon for the next 20 years.Thirdly, that Nissan engine was a financial disaster for GM-H, reportedly costing more than twice as much per unit than when the deal was struck years before, due to unfavourable currency fluctuations. Unable to make a profit with the VL, Holden couldn’t catch a break.That, along with mounting debt partly accrued due to the over-capitalisation and long-term sales underperformance of the also-Opel-based Camira project – a doomed endeavour given how close in size and price the two Holden family cars were – effectively bankrupted GM-H.On December 9, 1986, GM in Michigan bailed Holden out, and split the operations into the Holden Motor Company (manufacturing) and Holden Engine Company, the latter becoming a key export earner later on, allowing the brand to be less-encumbered with debt in the lead-up to the larger, second-generation Commodore’s release in August, 1988.The car behind the complicated legacyWhether the VL was a success or failure depends on your point of view. Commercially it under-performed, but critically… well, things were complicated.Available in government cheapo-spec SL, fleet-fodder Executive, private-buyer-baiting Berlina, luxury Calais and performance SS grades – with the latter trio being sedan-only bar one brief exception – it offered a broader choice than a very-complacent Ford.Actually, that’s a little harsh, as Ford was stretched developing the largely new-from-the-ground-up EA Falcon, along with the SA Capri convertible.What Holden desperately lacked were responses to the XF-based ute, panel van and long-wheelbase luxury car (Fairlane rival), as these were the provenance of the full-sized WB line-up that ceased in 1985. The VN-derived VG ute and VQ Statesman/Caprice twins wouldn’t surface until 1990.Contemporary reviews loved the Nissan I6’s BMW-levels of power delivery and straight-line performance, especially at the SL’s price point, and swooned over the turbo’s sensational speed and smoothness. But many also criticised the VL’s retrograde steering and suspension revisions that were meant to fix previous models’ sharp steering, but instead resulted in duller handling, excessive body movement and a lumpier ride. Fail.Holden was praised for solely offering a cheap V8, since Ford dropped theirs years before (and not rectified until 1991’s EB series), giving caravanning and boating-obsessed Australians an affordably torquey towing option, which nobody could match.To stoke VL sales, a Vacationer special arrived by mid 1987, while another – badged ‘200 Series’ in time for Australia’s Bicentennial – largely served as a spoiler for the EA Falcon the following March.HSV is bornThis was also the era of Holden’s very public breakup with racing hero Peter Brock over his infamous Polarizer engine-efficiency enhancer that GM-H wanted no part of. This led to the in-house Holden Special Vehicles (HSV) replacing Brock’s Holden Dealer Team, resulting in the HSV VL SV88 as the first in a long line of hot Commodores.An early standout was the HSV VL SS Group-A SV, unkindly branded the Plastic Pig or Batmobile despite boasting up to 231kW, developed to meet racing homologation regulations by Walkinshaw. But, with its outrageous body kit and pricing, sales stalled (it was released as VN came on stream), though now they’re a highly sought-after.VL afterlifeWith so much at stake, the VN arrived with huge fanfare in August 1988, and immediately addressed many of its predecessor’s perceived shortcomings, being equal-largest in class with Falcon, far-more modern inside and out and dynamically a better-behaved proposition.A more suitable family car for Australia, in other words.But the thing is, with the financially debilitating Nissan engine deal cancelled, the VN’s powertrain replacement – this time to a rough old Buick 3.8-litre V6 from North America – sealed the VL’s place in Holden folklore. Even with the very non-GM engine code name, RB30E is now considered one of the greats.If nothing else, the Commodore’s quick ascension to the top (a position it would continuously swap with the Falcon until the disastrous AU a decade later, but that’s another story) proves that Australians are basically size queens.Overall, 151,008 VLs were made over about 30 months, a record for any Commodore at the time, with 134,795 built for Australia, 4322 exported mostly to South East Asia and 12,720 in assembled from completely knocked-down components in New Zealand and Indonesia.The final first-gen Commodore may have lost the battle against the XF, but the big Holden eventually overtook – and outlived – the Falcon. The journey back began here.More importantly, it won the affection of Australian enthusiasts and loyalists like no other before or since – thanks ironically to that controversial Nissan heart within, saving the Commodore for 33 more years.Happy 40 birthday, VL.
Read the article
Subaru Outback Wilderness 2026 review: snapshot
By Byron Mathioudakis · 26 Feb 2026
The 2026 Subaru Outback is the brand’s first model to offer the adventure/off-road-ready Wilderness model.
Read the article
Subaru Outback Touring 2026 review: snapshot
By Byron Mathioudakis · 24 Feb 2026
The Subaru Outback AWD Touring is the Outback you buy if you want the luxury flagship version, though it is not the most expensive version of the new seventh-gen series.
Read the article