Suzuki Vitara vs Forthing Taikon 5

What's the difference?

In car years, 11 is ancient.

Back when it was first released, this-generation Vitara’s competitive pricing, progressive yet pretty design, pleasant interior packaging, sporty dynamics and general driving ease helped establish the emerging small SUV segment into the powerhouse it is today.

In some ways, today’s Turbo Hybrid still impresses, especially with its punchy performance, promising economy and no-nonsense packaging. Objectively, it is still a decent proposition, with few actual vices.

But the 2026 Vitara’s high pricing, embarrassingly outdated interior, underwhelming specification and noisy ride leave it feeling too expensive, too old and too exposed against newer and more-sophisticated rivals.

Even the brightest stars eventually need to retire.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel and meals provided.

Forthing remains something of an unknown quantity in Australia, but this first look at the Taikon 5 on local roads is promising.

It’s a modest mid-size SUV that’s priced accordingly and if you’re not a car person this will likely be enough to get people into a showroom.

Compared to most of its rivals it’s surprisingly pleasant and nice to drive, which is not something you can say about many first attempts.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with travel and meals provided.

While the albeit-cheeky Mazda CX-3 clearly looks like a product of last decade, the Vitara’s boxy, broad-stance proportions were prescient, pointing to the upright shapes that prevail today. In other words, the good-looking design has aged remarkably well.

Changes to the headlights, a reshaped bumper, a revised grille, restyled wheels and paint colours are the only ways you can differentiate new from old, ignoring the Hybrid badge out back.

We wonder whether Suzuki should have tried harder visually updating the Vitara?

Measuring in at nearly 4.2 metres long, 1.8m wide and 1.6m high, the square-rigged styling hides the smallness of the Vitara, yet also seems to liberate more space inside than you might expect, aided by deep side windows.

Conversely, Suzuki’s decision to retain the old Vitara dashboard – including much of the same instrumentation – roots it into the middle of last decade. This is very disappointing.

Outside, the Taikon 5 is inconspicuous to the point of anonymity. If you told me it was a new model from BYD, Chery, GWM or Leapmotor, I’d believe you.

The EV and REEV versions of this car look identical and the only way to tell them apart is the badging on the tailgate. Yes, that means the EV has a fuel filler cap that doesn’t open and serves no purpose.

Beyond the Forthing lettering on the tailgate, nothing identifies the car as a Forthing. Perhaps that will come in time, once more models arrive, but for now it’s a bland look.

Take the front. The angular LED daytime running lights and headlight set-up is cliche and overdone, plus the honeycomb grille is tacky. It's not helped by the prominent charge flap smack-bang in the middle of the front bumper.

Inside, the car takes the same all-too-similar approach of hanging everything off a central touchscreen.

The 14.6-inch touchscreen is large and prominently mounted, but elsewhere the dashboard already looks dated and cheap. It’s not helped by the exaggerated circular air vents that scream Audi or Mercedes-Benz knock-off, or the large silver panels on the steering wheel.

The practical shape, ease of access and spacious, airy cabin were reasons to buy the Vitara way back when, and remain relevant today.

But, stepping inside and taking a look around transports you to another time, like hearing Let it Happen by Tame Impala.

In the press release, Suzuki states: “Physical control switches remain a key focus, ensuring ease of use while driving, a touchpoint of Suzuki’s practical design philosophy.” Changing nothing in nearly a dozen years in production to save money seems more like the company’s key focus here. Even the steering wheel is precisely the same.

As we said earlier, nothing changed inside other than some minor trim, save for the new multimedia system that looks cheap and aftermarket compared to Suzuki’s earlier, distinctive and colourful quadrant layout. We welcome the inclusion of a digital speedometer, however.

Broad if flat front seats do the job, ahead of a workable driving position that helps provide good all-round vision as well as an easy reach to the multitude of buttons and switches placed around. The plastics have already proven to be long-lasting, while there is sufficient storage to be found. The climate control is effective, too.

The rear seat environment is spacious and pleasant enough, but lacks amenities like USB-C ports, cupholders and central air vents.

Further back, the load area is relatively large and simple to use. Cargo capacity varies from an unremarkable 362 litres to 642L (VDA – to the window height) or 1119L (to the ceiling), with the 60/40 rear backrests dropped providing extra versatility.

Thankfully, a space-saver spare wheel is included.

Overall, then, the Vitara’s cabin is roomy and user-friendly for a small SUV, but it also appears hopelessly out of date. That Suzuki also had the unrelated e-Vitara electric vehicle at the launch event just served to underline that fact.

Surprisingly standard across the Taikon 5 line-up is ventilation and a massage function for the driver’s seat. This is good value for money, plus the massage feels strong.

The driver’s seat also offers 10 ways of electric adjustment and most people should find a comfortable driving position. You sit high, which SUV buyers prefer for the commanding view.

The steering wheel doesn’t reinvent the wheel (pardon the pun). It’s conventional and straightforward, which is no bad thing. All the buttons are clearly labelled and do exactly what they say.

Behind it, the digital instrument cluster is unremarkable and clearly displays the critical information, including a digital speedometer, odometer and remaining range.

You’re able to cycle through several informative pages. Oddly, the up and down buttons on the steering wheel adjust the cluster’s brightness.

The 14.6-inch central touchscreen multimedia system is large, however it’s tilted too far back and picks up reflections as a result.

The interface is simple and there isn’t much to get lost in, which makes the occasional lag when opening apps and sub-menus harder to excuse.

Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard and the connection held up over our short driving loops.

The drive modes and vehicle settings live in the touchscreen, but the climate control gets its own bank of physical dials and touch-sensitive buttons. The latter is great to see given so many carmakers are burying it in the touchscreen.

Elsewhere in the cabin there is a fancy-looking and Volvo-esque crystal-style gear selector, a wireless phone charger (Exclusive only), two cupholders, an open storage area under the centre console, a decently sized centre console box, as well as a glovebox.

In the second row there’s enough space to get comfortable. At a leggy 182cm, I had plenty of legroom behind my own driving position and headroom is okay, though the panoramic glass sunroof in the top-spec Exclusive trim eats into it.

The virtually flat floor means getting three adults across the rear bench isn’t out of the question, though there’s little bolstering in the seat back and base, so you’ll slide around in the corners.

Second-row amenities include central console-mounted air vents, a singular USB-A port, as well as a fold-down armrest with cupholders.

There are ISOFIX child seat anchorage points on the two outboard rear seats and top tether points on all three.

The Exclusive comes with a power tailgate. It beeps and opens slowly, but eventually the job gets done.

Boot space is 480L with the rear seats upright, expanding to 1480L with them folded. The boot area is fairly spacious and there’s a flat load floor.

Depending on the variant there’s an underfloor compartment that’s big enough to store some charging cables.

The EV Exclusive comes with a space-saver spare wheel, which is critical if you do long-distance drives in rural and regional areas. Disappointingly it doesn’t feature in the entry-level EV Luxury which makes do with a tyre repair kit, despite having the space to fill.

All versions of the REEV also have a tyre repair kit, but this makes more sense as the space is taken up by the rear-mounted electric motor.

Both the EV and REEV are offered in two trim levels called Luxury and Exclusive. They are priced as follows:

• Forthing Taikon 5 REEV Luxury: $36,990
• Forthing Taikon 5 EV Luxury: $38,990
• Forthing Taikon 5 REEV Exclusive: $40,490
• Forthing Taikon 5 EV Exclusive: $42,490

All prices are drive-away

That pricing undercuts the likes of the BYD Sealion 6, Leapmotor C10, Geely EX5 and Starray EM-i, as well as the Jaecoo J7 PHEV.

The entry-level Luxury grade gets the following as standard:

• 19-inch alloy wheels
• Tyre repair kit
• LED headlights
• 8.8-inch digital instrument cluster
• 14.6-inch touchscreen multimedia system
• Four-speaker sound system
• Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
• Crystal style gear selector
• Synthetic leather upholstery
• 10-way electrically adjustable driver’s seat
• Four-way electrically adjustable front passenger seat
• Ventilated and massaging driver’s seat

That’s a fair amount of standard equipment for the asking price, but stepping up to the top-spec Exclusive adds:

• Space-saver spare wheel (EV Exclusive only)
• Power tailgate
• Panoramic glass sunroof
• Rear privacy glass
• Power-folding side mirrors
• Six-speaker sound system
• Wireless phone charger
• Synthetic leather-wrapped steering wheel

Although the EV and REEV versions of the Taikon 5 are virtually identical in terms of specifications, there are some small differences.

The EV has a proper start-stop button, the REEV doesn’t and instead turns on and off when you unlock and lock the car. Additionally the EV has an automatic mode for the climate control which the REEV misses out on.

If you’re expecting a Toyota-style series-parallel hybrid system here, forget it.

Instead, Suzuki offers a far-simpler, lighter and cheaper alternative that, by and large, does reduce fuel consumption. In other words, this is a mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) that, unlike others like Mazda’s, you can feel working away.

On paper, things look a bit shaky, since power drops noticeably compared to the previous 1.4-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol BoosterJet engine this unit is based on.

This version makes just under 81kW of power at 4500rpm, instead of 103kW at 5500rpm, in the interests of economy. Torque jumps though, from 220Nm to 235Nm, between a low 2000rpm to 2500rpm.

More importantly, it is coupled to a 48-volt integrated starter motor generator acting as an electric motor, and 48V 8Ah lithium-ion battery, adding an additional 12kW/50Nm to simultaneously boost acceleration and reduce consumption and emissions.

Power is sent to the front wheels via a six-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, while the AWD version also sends drive to the rear axle when slippage is detected.

The whole MHEV system adds just 15kg, and is nestled between the MacPherson strut front axle and torsion beam rear end, for even weight distribution.

While the Forthing Taikon 5 EV and REEV may look virtually identical, what is lurking under the bonnet is rather different.

The EV has a single, front-mounted electric motor that produces 150kW and 340Nm.

The REEV instead has a rear-mounted electric motor, making it rear-wheel drive. It produces 120kW and 240Nm, which is 30kW and 100Nm less than the EV.

It’s paired with a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine that’s capable of producing up to 75kW. It acts purely as a generator and never drives the wheels.

The Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD returns a combined average 5.8 litres per 100km, while the AWD version is rated at 5.9L/100km. This translates to between 130 grams and 139g/km of carbon-dioxide emissions, respectively.

The previous 1.4-litre turbo equivalents were 5.9L and 6.2L/100km, so that mild-hybrid tech seems to make some difference. Our box-fresh test car’s trip computer driving around Sydney’s outer suburbs displayed 6.2L/100km.

Filling the 47L fuel tank with the required 95 RON premium-unleaded petrol, expect to average around 810km of range.

Both versions of the Taikon 5 have a lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery.

The EV has a 64.4kWh unit that’s good for up to 427km of WLTP electric range, whereas the REEV has a smaller 31.2kWh unit good for up to 170km of WLTP electric range.

For the EV that’s fairly standard for the segment, but with the REEV the battery pack is much larger than many of its similarly priced rivals.

You can’t forget the REEV also has a petrol engine that’s fed by a 43L fuel tank. This allows for a WLTP total range of up to 937km.

Both versions have a Type 2/CCS port on the front bumper, allowing for AC and DC charging.

The EV has a peak AC charging rate of 11kW and a peak DC charging rate of 80kW. The latter is mediocre, but it allows for a 30 to 80 per cent charge to occur in 30 minutes.

The REEV has a peak AC charging rate of 6.6kW and a peak DC charging rate of 40kW. Despite being slower, a 30 to 80 per cent changer using the latter is still claimed to take only 30 minutes.

Suzuki allowed only a frustratingly limited amount of time for us to drive the Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD, over some outer-suburban Sydney back roads, in convoy with a lead car and in heavy traffic, so first impressions are limited.

But, unsurprisingly, it’s all very familiar, after years of testing earlier iterations.

Essentially, acceleration now feels leisurely in 'Eco' and 'Auto' when previously the 1.4L BoosterJet always felt punchy, but it becomes much stronger in 'Sport', suggesting the MHEV’s economy focus is the priority. The latter mode makes the Vitara feel lively and moves things along fairly quickly, but leaving it in Sport mode would defeat the purpose of trying to save fuel.

Meanwhile, the Vitara’s chassis calibration remains on the sporty side, with keen steering response and a decent level of handling agility there for the taking. And even the ride comfort wasn’t too bad, considering that too little suspension travel and too much road noise betray the age of this vehicle’s platform – though that may have also had something to do with us driving this back-to-back with the smoother e-Vitara EV.

Finally, the ADAS tech didn’t seem to interfere at all, though a longer drive may reveal otherwise.

The Vitara still drives okay, then, but its refinement and noise suppression may be issues for some people used to newer SUVs. The bigger problem for us is just how old the driving experience feels sitting inside such a dated cabin. Stale sums it up.

We also had a brief stint around a moderately-demanding off-road 4WD course to test the Turbo Hybrid AWD’s AllGrip set-up. The limited off-road aids – 4WD Lock, hill-descent control, a paltry 175mm ground clearance – helped see it navigate several carefully-chosen sections fairly confidently, but we can’t imagine this being the deal maker or breaker.

Overall, based on our brief time with it, the Vitara Turbo Hybrid remains an easy, competent and even enjoyable small SUV from behind the wheel, but one that feels dated in too many areas, especially at its asking price.

The EV’s front-mounted electric motor is adequate, rather than quick. It’s enough to keep up with urban traffic.

Because it’s front-wheel drive with full torque available from a standstill, don’t be surprised by a touch of wheelspin if you bury the accelerator.

When taking off harder the electric motor can make prominent whirring sounds, but this kind of feedback is nice as an eerily quiet car can feel disconcerting.

In the REEV, the 1.5-litre petrol engine only ever acts as a generator, so it drives like an EV. Its electric motor sits on the rear axle, which makes it quieter from the driver’s seat and rear-wheel drive. In practice the lower outputs blunt it and it feels slower than the EV.

There’s still enough off the line. You only notice the deficit at higher speeds.

There are a total of four EV/hybrid modes to choose from, including EV-only, EV priority, hybrid and fuel only. They all do exactly what its name suggests.

Due to the limited driving program at the launch, I didn’t get to fully experience the extent of how the REEV powertrain operates under every circumstance. For example, I couldn’t drive it with a low battery charge and have it solely rely on the engine.

When the engine fires up to charge the battery, it stays quiet and in the background. If you're not paying attention you wouldn’t know it’s on.

Both versions of the Taikon 5 offer two levels of regenerative braking. There’s no one-pedal mode, meaning you need to use the brake pedal to come to a stop.

What’s surprising is the way it drives. Its rivals can drive like a dog’s breakfast and while the Taikon 5 isn’t class leading, the dynamics are better than you’d expect.

What I mean by this is the steering has some sense of what’s happening with the tyres when you turn the wheel. There are three settings to choose from and the most natural is Sport mode, which is the firmest.

There's no Australian-specific suspension tune, but it’s still generally compliant and comfort oriented. Unlike many of its rivals though, it’s not overly soft and floaty.

In terms of noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) the Taikon 5 is a generally quiet car, even at higher speeds. However, we noticed some plastic trim rattles and creaks, which isn’t ideal given they're brand new.

At this stage the Forthing Taikon 5 hasn’t received an ANCAP safety rating and is therefore unrated for now.

The following safety equipment is standard across the line-up:

• Six airbags
• Autonomous emergency braking (AEB)
• Blind-spot monitoring
• Front and rear cross-traffic alert
• Lane-keep assist
• Adaptive cruise control
• Reversing camera
• Rear parking sensors

Stepping up to the Exclusive brings front parking sensors, as well as a high-definition surround-view camera.

On the road, the Taikon 5 is a welcome relief from the bings, bongs and chimes that plague many of its rivals.

That’s partly because it goes without a driver attention monitoring system. This is the culprit of many bings and bongs in rival vehicles.

The only safety gripe is the lane-keep assist can be a touch hands-on and yank at the wheel if you get too close to the painted lines.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, along with five years of roadside assistance if the vehicle is serviced at an authorised dealer.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, while the basic capped-price servicing costs are $329, $429, $339, $539 and $349 annually for the first five years or 100,000km, respectively. That's an average of $397.

At the time of publishing Suzuki listed 90 dealers throughout Australia.

The Forthing Taikon 5 is covered by a seven-year, 200,000km warranty, while the high-voltage battery is covered for eight years, 200,000km.

There’s 12 months of roadside assistance which can be extended out to five years provided you service within the Forthing dealer network, when required.

Logbook servicing with the REEV is required every 12 months or 15,000km, whereas with the EV it’s every 12 months or 20,000km.

Forthing is offering five years of capped-price servicing. With the EV it’s $1815 and the REEV it’s $2605 which works out to $363 and $521, respectively, per year.

Forthing is still scaling its dealer network in Australia and it currently has 20 sites operational. The company plans to have a total of 35 by the end of 2026.