Toyota Prado vs Range Rover Evoque

What's the difference?

Toyota has at last brought the Prado kicking and screaming into the 21st century.

Real improvements in design, tech, comfort and capability have changed what was consistently regarded as a solid off-road tourer and family conveyance into something much better.

This new-generation Prado is the best iteration of this vehicle: roomy and refined, well equipped, nice to drive, and now with a welcome increase in towing capacity, but it is underpowered for something so bulky.

Ultimately it feels like a missed opportunity – Toyota had a chance to rattle the cage with a real game-changer of a vehicle, but the Prado just isn’t that at all and, while it's good, it's not great as we’d all hoped.

The Range Rover Evoque is more highly specified and more luxurious than ever, and this plug-in hybrid version makes the most of what’s on offer with its slick but familiar feel from behind the wheel. 

Unfortunately, it does have an eye-watering price tag to go with its classy design and the options list is a bit rude, all things considered, but the core offering is a solid luxury buy for city-slickers, nonetheless. 

What makes the Evoque P300e stand out for me is its impressive EV driving range and excellent charging specs which make it as convenient as possible to make the most of its electrified features.

It’s up to the buyer whether these conveniences and the Range Rover badge are worth swapping into a car a full size down from its luxury plug-in rivals for the same money.

The new Prado is 4990mm long (with a 2850mm wheelbase), 1980mm wide, 1935mm high, and it has a kerb weight of 2520kg. The wheel tracks are 1664mm at the front, and 1668mm at the rear.

As mentioned the Prado now sits on the same platform as the 300 Series so this is not an insubstantial vehicle.

It now has a distinctive chunky, almost straight up and down, old-school look whereas before the Prado carried softer lines.

The heritage square grille is big as is everything else onboard: with bulky wing mirrors, side steps, wheel arches and tyres adding to the vehicle’s wide, squat stance. 

The Prado has rectangular LED headlights in Australia, whereas other markets have the option of the round retro-style lights on their 250 Series.

Overall, the Prado looks even better in the metal than it does in the photos that Toyota fans have been salivating over for so long.

Even with its styling changes and a new fresh all-encompassing look and feel the cabin of the Prado remains comfortably familiar. If you’ve ever spent any length of time in a LandCruiser then you know what I’m talking about.

Build quality is tremendous, fit and finish impressive, the seats are suitably supportive and the Prado’s cabin is an easy space in which to quickly become comfortable.

The Evoque has always been a car all about its sleek, city-slicking design, an iconic piece of modern SUV art from Jaguar Land Rover head of design, Gerry McGovern.

With its shapely proportions, clever descending roofline, and a silhouette which successfully reflects a miniaturised version of the Range Rover, the Evoque is at once classy with a faint suggestion of toughness under the skin.

The blacked-out grille, slimline headlights, and contemporary strip across the tailgate all serve to add intrigue to this SUV, and the extra detailing in the front bumper, shapeliness of the bonnet, and contrast black trims (with extra contrast panels on our test car matching the gloss black wheels) serving to add to its premium appeal.

It’s important to remember, while the Evoque slides into a busy small SUV landscape now, it was one of the first to make a premium car so successfully appealing in this small SUV space way back in 2011 with the first Evoque, following Land Rover’s historic trend of being in front of the SUV curve.

Rival small SUV designs may have caught up in the minds of many with the likes of the Audi Q3, BMW X2, and Volvo XC40 shining in recent years, but few have won as many design accolades as the Evoque.

Range Rover seems to be leaning into a more upper luxury trend, not just with the pricing, but with the vibe of the car’s interiors, too.

The new generation Evoque, for example, took a big jump in the look and feel of its interior appointments when it launched in 2019, and over time has only consolidated its market positioning.

The HSE grade which our P300e hybrid arrives in is lavish on the inside, with lovely suede-like seats, intricate contrasting grey cloth trims in the doors (do I detect an influence from Volvo here?) and a plush-looking dash, all finished in soft-to-the touch materials.

Attention to detail, like the silver bezels which adorn the centre console and media screen, add to the premium flair which lifts the Range Rover badge above the Land Rover one, and I do like the way the additional function screen seamlessly melts into the piano finish and integrated dials. While it’s always a nightmare to keep gloss piano finishes clean, it looks oh-so primo.

It’s a little odd the P300e has analogue dials, which seems to miss the premium edge which a fully digital dash might provide although the 7.0-inch centre dash screen has a great resolution and speed, as well as a mostly well laid out operating system.

I found the R-Dynamic modes, which can sharpen up the accelerator response and steering buried two menus deep, unnecessarily hard to find, as were various EV information screens and other less important functions.

The new Prado has some nice touches over and above the standard features fit-out of lower grades, such as a colour head-up display, digital rear-view mirror, heated steering wheel, power-adjustable steering column, heating and ventilation (front seats), eight-way power-adjustable driver seat and four-way power-adjustable for the front passenger, and genuine leather-accented upholstery throughout.

It also has a deep refrigerated centre console, 14-speaker JBL sound system and a sunroof.

The 12.3-inch multimedia touchscreen dominates the layout upfront and is easy enough to operate, though I did have strife getting Apple CarPlay to work off my phone but the cause was my dodgy old charge cord. 

Speaking of charges, there are six USB-C ports (but no USB-A) in the cabin, and a wireless charger in front of the auto shifter.

There is a 12V DC socket (upfront) and a 220V/100W socket in the rear cargo area.

The second row is a 60:40 split-fold configuration and passengers there have access to aircon controls and directional vents as well as charge points.

Cargo space in the rear is listed as 954L with all seats in use, and 1895L if the second row is folded down. But the rear cargo area is compromised in its packability because of the raised floor (it’s lifted to house the 48-volt V-Active system’s battery) and also the bulky wheel-arch housings. This cargo area is a narrow, shallow space.

The load limit for the raised floor is labelled as 60kg.

There are cupholders at the rear (atop the wheel arch housings), which are leftovers from the three-row layout.

The rear cargo area has a 220V/100W socket, four tie-down points, and a sliding cover to conceal anything that’s left in the back.

There is some very shallow underfloor storage space under the rubber matting.

The rear space can be accessed from outside the vehicle through a window that is operated via a button on the rear door, or the whole rear door can be opened (it swings out from left to right) and locked in place.

The Prado has an underslung full-size spare.

While it still plays the role of Range Rover’s smallest SUV, the current Evoque is much bigger than the car it replaced in 2019. I would go so far as to say it’s deceptively large on the inside.

Front occupants are treated to a cabin which now feels almost as wide as an actual Range Rover, with plenty of room for elbows on either side, which are, of course, met by lovely soft-touch surfaces.

The raised console helps with the upmarket feel, as does the plush dash. The standard 14-way adjust front seats help to accommodate most passengers, with my only criticism being the large A-pillars and height of the dash can make it feel a little bit claustrophobic compared to some rival luxury SUVs.

Storage is offered through a set of large door pockets, a centre console box, dual bottle holders behind the shift lever, and a healthy nook underneath the climate controls, which also hosts a wireless charging bay.

The rear seats share the same comfortable rim as the front ones, and also have large pockets in the doors. Despite the descending roofline, I had just enough room for my head at 182cm tall although it is notable the space in the PHEV feels smaller with the raised floor needed to accommodate the batteries.

I had a little airspace for my knees behind my own driving position, too. The main drawback for rear passengers is the large transmission tunnel, making it difficult to accommodate an adult in the centre position.

There are adjustable air vents for rear passengers, but it is frustrating Land Rover has chosen to make rear USB-C charging ports an arbitrary $270 option.

The boot is also deceptively large for such a small SUV, measuring in at 472 litres (VDA), it’s above average for the small SUV class and fits the full CarsGuide luggage set, provided you remove the parcel shelf as it's just a smidge too high.

You'll also need to keep your charging cables in the boot, as there's no underfloor storage, the entire space being taken up by a space-saver spare wheel.

While we’re on the topic of excess, the Evoque HSE P300e certainly reflects it in the price tag. This plug-in starts from a whopping $105,060 price-wise putting it in the same league as luxury PHEV rivals a full size up.

Because there are no small luxury segment small SUVs in this league currently, we’re in fact forced to compare the Evoque to cars like the Volvo XC60 Recharge (from $100,990), BMW X3 xDrive30e ($107,000), or the particularly good-value Lexus NX 450h+ (from $88,323).

All are larger than our Evoque here, so it’s automatically at a disadvantage, and as is the usual case with Land Rover products, there’s an extensive and occasionally rude options list which can add thousands more to the price.

Our test vehicle, for example, had over $10,000 worth of options attached to it, only three of which (dual-zone climate with second row vents - $1000, and the additional Type 2 charging cable - $528) I would bother to add.

The included equipment at the HSE grade is good, with 20-inch alloy wheels, 14-way electrically adjustable front seats, Matrix LED headlights, a 10-inch tiltable ‘Pivi Pro’ touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, as well as built-in navigation, and a second screen for the climate and car functions.

There’s also a semi-digital dash (oddly, with analogue dials for engine rpm and road speed, but a 7.0-inch digital element for everything else), the choice of either leather or suede interior trim, a leather-bound steering wheel, and keyless entry with push-start ignition. 

It’s nice to see the Matrix LEDs as standard here, as well as a swish set of screens and a premium feeling interior. But it’s also frustrating things like digital radio ($520), a head-up display ($1690), data plan ($1040), and USB-C for the rear seats ($351) are optional on a car north of $100,000, especially since most of these are standard on its rivals.

One major catch is how long you might be waiting for one. Some dealer sources tell us customers will need to wait up to 12 months for delivery at the time of writing, so be prepared for this if you want one.

The 250 Series Prado has 2.8-litre four-cylinder diesel engine – producing 150kW and 500Nm – with Toyota’s 48-volt V-Active technology. 

V-Active technology comprises a motor generator, 48-Volt battery and DC/DC converter which enables a stop/start system and this set-up is “designed to offer … improvements in driveability, performance, fuel efficiency and noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) compared with the standard 2.8-litre turbo-diesel engine”, Toyota reckons.

The 48-volt V-Active technology essentially amounts to a stop-start system aimed at reducing fuel consumption, but it doesn’t add anything in terms of performance.

What’s more, it takes up space in the engine bay and the system’s 48V lithium battery weighs 7.6kg, so the total weight of the system – between 30-35kg, as estimated by Toyota – has to be taken into account when you’re aiming to load within the Prado’s 580kg payload.

It has an eight-speed automatic transmission and a full-time dual-range four-wheel-drive system. 

This engine and auto arrangement is generally impressive – smooth, with plenty of torque across a wide rev range. It does, however, feel underpowered and it needs extra encouragement (heavy right boot) to get off the mark – but it otherwise yields a controlled and refined driving experience, especially on the open road at highway speeds.

The Evoque now sports Jaguar Land Rover’s hybridised ‘Ingenium’ engine family across the range, and the set-up which appears in the plug-in hybrid model might be the most interesting.

It consists of a 1.5-litre three-cylinder combustion engine which is said to produce 147kW/280Nm, and an electric motor powering the rear axle producing 80kW, the two of which combine for an impressive quoted total output of 227kW/540Nm, driving all four wheels.

The motor sources its power from a 15kWh lithium-ion battery pack under the floor of the car, which provides a claimed 62km of fully-electric driving range.

Land Rover also replaced the mechanical brake pedal with a drive-by-wire one to allow for improved ‘blended’ regenerative braking.

The Toyota LandCruiser Prado has an official fuel consumption of 7.6L/100km (on a combined cycle).

I recorded 10.4L/100km on this test. I did a lot of high- and low-range 4WDing and the Prado was never working hard.

The Prado has a 110L fuel tank so, going by my on-test fuel-consumption figure, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 1057km from a full tank. 

It has a 17.4-litre AdBlue tank.

Claimed energy consumption on the combined WLTP cycle for the Range Rover Evoque P300e is 2.0L/100km. As with all plug-in hybrids though, this will heavily depend on how it is driven.

The 15kWh battery is said to provide a 62km driving range (again, on the WLTP cycle), which seems healthy for a PHEV, and I was pleased to find that my car was reporting about 56km on a full charge, not far off the claim.

Importantly, the Evoque has stellar charging specifications, which make it ideal for a city-slicker with minimal time to conveniently charge.

I was shocked to find a DC charging port when I flipped open the panel, which is capable of charging the tiny battery up in just 20 minutes (at a peak rate of 35kW), while on a slower but easier-to-find AC charger, it can extract 7kW allowing a charge time of around two hours.

This is well above par for a plug-in hybrid, and makes charging quick, painless and convenient, even for those who can’t charge at home.

As a result of this ease-of-charging and therefore minimal time spent in the hold or hybrid modes, my car reported an astounding 1.0/100km of fuel consumption during my week, covering mostly urban kilometres.

The only drawback is the need to fill this small turbo engine with mid-shelf 95RON fuel.

Previous generations of Prado were never atrocious on road, but there was always substantial body roll, it was a bit floaty and it was one of those four-wheel drive wagons that, on sealed surfaces, tended to feel like a couch on wheels.

That’s no longer the case because this new-generation Prado is well controlled, well composed in all scenarios and it really is nice to drive – even when you move from bitumen onto a dirt track and you can still keep up a fair bit of speed.

On the new chassis the Prado feels settled, nicely controlled and that well-weighted steering has an even balance to it, especially when things become a little bit lumpy and bumpy here and there. 

And most of that ol’ Prado body roll that was evident in previous iterations has been ironed out.

Past generations of Prados weren't ordinary in the off-road department, not by a long shot. And this new Prado has improved on the proven formula of those previous generations: from its mechanical foundations, plenty of low-down torque through to its selectable driving modes (rock, sand, mud), the Prado is well equipped to tackle pretty much any off-road circumstance you can conjure with your over-active imagination. 

Now, with the added bonus of new and improved suspension and a sway bar disconnect system, those factors have bolstered the vehicle skill-set that's already there.

There is plenty of driver visibility through the cabin to the front, to the sides and to the rear. So you can see everything. But as well as that, you also have the valuable addition of new driver-assist technology, including the multi terrain monitor camera system to make sure you can scrutinise any sight lines that you may not be able to see naturally from the driver's. 

The steering feels sharp, it's well weighted and balanced and with a longer wheelbase on this chassis the Prado’s body always feels controlled and composed on fast dirt roads or through low-speed four-wheel-driving situations. 

The eight-speed automatic transmission is very clever and works well in conjunction with the aforementioned selectable driving modes, which tweak engine output, transmission response and throttle control. 

The Altitude is the most off-road-focused of the line-up and to that end it has a centre diff lock, rear diff lock and swaybar disconnect system – and all those elements add up to a nice bonus for a vehicle that has always been a decent off-road tourer. 

So it has plenty going for it, but it’s not all good news though. 

Toyota reckons it's V-Active system is aimed at fuel consumption but it also helps to produce a little more torque in off-road situations during which you may need extra torque. 

But I've seen no real discernible difference in terms of performance, at those low speeds coming from that unit. It may be so seamless that you don't notice it at all, but I've only noticed that the Prado has performed as it should with that engine and that transmission on board. 

I can't credit any improvements in performance to that 48 volt unit that's now on board. 

The Prado is compromised by ground clearance and off-road angles that are more suited to a city-friendly vehicle than a purpose-built off-road vehicle. 

Having said that, ground clearance is fairly standard for a large four-wheel-drive wagon – it sits at a listed 221mm off the dirt, which is satisfactory – and it has a wading depth of about 700mm. 

The off-road angles of approach (32 degrees) and departure (17 degrees) are also standard for this class and size of vehicle, although especially in this Altitude, the departure angle has been somewhat compromised because of the underslung tyre and the addition of optional accessories (towing kit etc) on this text vehicle.

The Prado’s ramp-over angle is not listed but this new-generation Prado, with its longer 300 Series-size wheelbase, likely offers about 21 degrees.

The underbody does at times feel quite low and vulnerable to hitting the ground, even though underbody protection is quite substantial.

It's Toyo Tires Open Country A/T (all-terrain) tyres (265/70R18 116H) are perfectly fine for most off-road scenarios, but you can always do more and go further with a set of better, more aggressive all-terrain tyres, especially some light-truck construction rubber. 

It's bulky sidesteps, while handy for getting in and out of the vehicle itself, can also be considered vulnerable to damage – and are prone to rubbing against rocks through tight rutted climbs, that sort of thing.

But those aspects aren't deal-breakers, and a lot of the Prado’s shortcomings – ground clearance, off-road angles, tyres – can be easily resolved with a visit to Australia's aftermarket industry.

And despite those minor niggles I did have a lot of fun driving this Prado.

For those looking to use their Prado as a towing platform, the good news is it can now legally tow the segment standard maximum of 3500kg (braked) (up from the previous generation's 3000kg) and it has a pre-wired and integrated towbar.

Payload is listed as 580kg, GVM is 3100kg, and GCM is 6600kg.

The second-gen Evoque is still the lovely, luxury, small SUV it was when it launched in 2019, and this plug-in hybrid version only serves to improve the formula, adding sleek electric driving characteristics to the already-smooth turbo engine and torque converter automatic.

Interestingly, and like its Volvo XC60 rival, the electric motor is located on the rear axle, giving this car the odd characteristic of being rear-wheel drive when driven electrically, or predominantly front-wheel drive when driven in combustion mode.

Speaking of modes, this car does the bulk of the management, with only three driving modes available to the pilot. These include the default ‘hybrid’ mode, which as the name suggests, blends the two power sources with more of an emphasis on electric driving when the battery is charged.

There's also an electric mode, which will only use the rear axle motor until the battery runs out, and a ‘Hold’ mode which will still blend the two sources but predominantly rely on the combustion engine to maintain the car’s state of charge.

You might want to use the last mode if you're travelling long-distance, to maintain the electric range for where it is most efficient - in low-speed stop-start driving.

The regenerative braking is not adjustable, having just a single mild level. It’s far from the single-pedal driving you can experience in a fully electric car, but Land Rover has made the brake pedal fly-by-wire so it can blend increased regen with the mechanical brakes.

It makes for a familiar experience from behind the wheel for those coming straight out of a purely combustion vehicle.

The electrified brake pedal does have the consequence of removing a bit of feel for a keen driver, and the same can be said for the rather slow steering tune in the default settings which makes the Evoque feel more luxurious and less sporty or reactive than it could be.

It’s a shame, because the two power sources combine to make for a thumping amount of power when you stick your boot in, and the all-wheel drive system and nicely balanced suspension keep this little SUV well under control in the corners.

As with my original Evoque range review in 2019, though, it is notable how heavy this SUV feels, particularly compared to some rivals like the Audi Q3.

The heftiness suits the Evoque's expanded dimensions and even more upmarket feel, but despite the power on offer it’s not an agile SUV to be carving corners in.

At least the ride quality and quietness is superb, making the Evoque an ideal SUV for driving around the centre of pothole-stricken Sydney, with a notable amount of poise. At the end of the day, isn’t that what this Range Rover was built for?

Despite its long options list, thankfully all key safety equipment is standard on the Evoque. Active items include auto emergency braking, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, traffic sign recognition, driver attention alert, a clear exit monitor, and adaptive cruise control.

Only two items which could be considered under the safety umbrella remain on the options list (the options list becoming a recurring theme in this review), a 360-degree parking camera ($500), and the ‘ClearSight’ rear view mirror, which is able to show a camera view out the rear if the mirror is obscured by luggage or people in the cabin ($1230).

Elsewhere, the Evoque scores two ISOFIX child seat mounting points on the outer rear seats, and three top tethers across the rear row.

There are six airbags, and despite notably missing a front centre airbag, which is often required for a maximum safety rating to today’s standard, the Evoque maintains the maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating it was awarded in 2019. For the record, it scored very highly across all categories.

The Prado is covered by Toyota’s five year/unlimited km warranty.

Servicing is scheduled for every six months or 10,000km and, under Toyota’s capped-price servicing, each of the first 10 services costs $390.

The 48-volt battery set-up is covered by a five year/unlimited km warranty. 

As of April, 2021 all Land Rover products are finally covered by an industry-standard five-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, matching its key rivals, and beating out BMW which persists with an old three-year warranty promise. Five years of roadside assist is also included for the duration.

When it comes to servicing, the P300e is available to be purchased with a five-year plan ($2650 - $530 annually) which covers 102,000km of visits.

This pack is well worthwhile as Land Rover servicing is generally quite expensive when purchased a-la-carte.