Mahindra XUV700 vs Ford Puma

What's the difference?

We love a car which subverts expectations, and for the most part, the XUV700 has managed to. It feels like the brand has leapt over a few steps when it comes to design, quality, and particularly drivability, which bodes well when you combine it with a bargain price, a good equipment list and solid packaging.

The question is: Does the Australian market have room for yet another value player in a space already so well occupied by Chinese newcomers? Only time will tell.

If a minimum price and maximum interior space are your priorities, then the Puma is not for you. Especially so in the flagship ST-Line V, which may seem too small and a tad cramped compared to, say, a Seltos, C-HR or ASX.

Where the Ford excels, typically, is in the way it encourages the keen driver while cosseting four occupants (and a surprising amount of their cargo). There's a poise and maturity to the way the Puma moves that puts it on a par with or even beyond some premium compact SUVs. Even the styling is a statement. If the badges (and dashboard) were covered, you might be convinced this cat is actually a Jag.

If all that is more important, then the ST-Line V is for you. The very antithesis, then, of the unassuming and unloved EcoSport the Puma usurps.

The XUV700 is a clean-sheet design on an all-new platform and it shows. There are still echoes of the past in this SUVs bodywork, with the raised rear haunches and traditional Mahindra-shaped grille, but it feels like it’s taken a massive leap into the 21st century this time around.

It has a strong modern flavour and presence on the road, which doesn’t feel more than a generation behind like previous Mahindra offerings. Gone are the awkward curves and frumpy edges of its predecessors, and instead we’re welcomed by a more refined face, nipped and tucked rear with sporty touches, tough haunches and a contemporary overall look.

Inside the most dramatic upgrades have been deployed, including the impressive digital suite, seemingly decent software with a quick, responsive, and customisable instrument cluster, a new more attractive steering wheel, and a much smoother flow and coherency to design which we haven’t seen before from the Indian giant.

There are only a handful of areas, like the dorky elongated shifter, some hard plastics in the doors and atop the shapely dash, and the manual handbrake in the base car to remind you of its bargain price-point and origins.

It’s nice these attributes unite for an uncontroversial and modern overall feel, and quality is feeling on-par, but it’s also hardly original.

The headlights and steering wheel look like they could be worn by any Renault, the tail-lights look like they belong on a Nissan, and the dual-screen dash and door-mounted electric seat controls are clearly meant to emulate Mercedes.

Actually, one for the switchgear nerds, the function stalks are from the SsangYong parts bin, a holdover from when Mahindra owned the Korean automaker. Still, if you’re going to take inspiration, I can think of worse places to take it from, and it’s frankly remarkable all these pieces of inspiration fall together so well.

If you search for the 1998 Puma coupe, you'll see some vague similarities with its modern SUV namesake, especially in their anthropomorphic face. It's in the eyes. There are also hints of Aston Martin (DBX), Porsche (Macan) and – let's face it – Mazda (CX-3).

Yet the real achievement lies in the way Ford has managed to make a 4.2-metre-long by 1.8m wide by 1.6m high crossover look so svelte, with the resulting balanced proportions, flowing lines and taut surfacing giving the Puma quite an athletic visual presence. After the EcoSport failure, head-turning looks were deemed paramount.

The extra girth gained by widening the Fiesta's platform allowed Ford's designers to create a muscular body that could also accommodate a metre-wide tailgate opening, while beneath the cargo floor is an exceptionally deep storage box, bringing better-than-expected practicality to boot.

Low-cost options in the mid-size SUV space usually get a bunch of basic stuff wrong. Laggy, ugly software, for example, is prevalent in the MG HS, while clumsy switchgear takes away from the Haval H6, and a particularly awkward driving position is notable in the LDV D90.

Mahindra’s XUV700 does not fall into these traps. The front seat feels spacious and airy, the seating position is high but not unsettling, and the thing which took me aback the most is the way everything works.

It’s a little annoying the base car gets no telescopic adjust and misses out on a second bottle holder because of the manual handbrake, but other than this, the ergonomics in the cabin are solid. A centre dial, for example, can be switched from navigation controls to function as a volume dial if desired, and there are plenty of shortcut buttons for the multimedia and the dual-zone climate making it a breeze to adjust things on the move.

For storage there is a large bottle holder and map pocket in each door, a large bottle holder (two in the case of the AX7L) in the centre, a bay under the climate unit good for phones and wallets (it is a wireless charging pad in the AX7L), and there’s a deep armrest console box between the front occupants.

The second row is also airy and spacious, with a nearly flat floor making even the centre position seemingly suitable for an adult. Behind my own seating position I had plenty of space at 182cm tall, and there are a set of adjustable air vents plus a slot for a phone, a USB-C charging outlet, and large bottle holders in the doors.

The third row? It’s not bad, but I’ve sat in better. The left-hand side second-row seat folds up and rolls forward, making access better than some of its rivals, but behind the second row my knees are hard up against the seat in front, and my head is touching the roof. There’s decent amenity; a bottle holder on each side and an adjustable air vent with a fan controller, but this is a space best left for kids.

Mahindra doesn’t have an official boot capacity number to give us yet, but predicts it will be over 700 litres given the dimensions. With the third-row folded it looks cavernous, but with it deployed you’ll be lucky to get a day bag in behind.

For those interested in towing, the XUV700 can tow a 1500kg braked trailer (750kg unbraked) and there’s halfway decent ground clearance, at 196mm.

Compact yet spacious, the ST-Line V's interior has strong as well as weak points.

Let's start with the latter. The most obvious connection with the Fiesta is in the Puma's dashboard, which is largely shared between the two. After all the effort expended on the design and chassis, this is somewhat disappointing. There's nothing wrong essentially with the fascia's aesthetics or functionality – it's just that the look is humdrum and dated. What's needed is something with the visual wow factor as found in the latest Peugeot 2008, especially at this price point.

Yet Ford has at least tried to put some tinsel inside this most expensive version of its smallest SUV.

Stitched perforated leather seat facings, carbon-fibre-look trim and soft vinyl coverings in key touchpoint areas bring an upmarket look and feel, backed up by a now-familiar digital instrumentation layout, a lovely flat-bottomed three-spoke steering wheel, easy and intuitive multimedia interface and a wireless phone charger. That electronic cluster, by the way, changes colour and markings but doesn't have the scope of multimedia displays of, say, Audi's Virtual Cockpit. It's comparatively rudimentary.

Conversely, there's a solidity and quietness as well, offering a level of refinement that's usually found in more-premium Euro alternatives. We weren't expecting that, though of course this is a German Ford product.

Our test car also boasted a vast glass opening sunroof, adding to the opulence. With all this gear, the ST-Line V's cabin is properly appealing.

On the practicality front, entry and egress is pretty good, the driving position is excellent (thanks in no small part to a big amount of adjustability for both the steering column and seats), the front cushions themselves are sumptuously enveloping, while wide door pockets and a big glovebox obviously come in useful. And there's a USB-C outlet in the centre cubby between the seats. How modern.

However, rear vision out is poor, there are no seat warmers and some of the lower-lying plastics are a bit drab.

The back seat isn't really suitable for people over 175cm, as kneeroom is limited and taller scalps may scrape the ceiling with the twin-pane sunroof in situ. The latter also means no overhead grab handles.

But the backrest angle and cushions themselves are fine, even for longer journeys. Just don't expect to squeeze a third adult in the back unless rubbing shoulders won't bug you. Note, too, that the rear cushion does not slide or tilt forward to allow for a lower load area when the backrest is folded down. Pity.

There is a receptacle in both doors for small bottles but no cupholders whatsoever (how can Ford call itself an American company?), or face-level air vents – though the large dash vent outputs do reach the rear. Amenities such as USBs and cupholders are AWOL; and vision out from back there is limited by the high shoulder line. Tough if you're trying to peer out. Sorry, Fido.

The Puma's overall compact footprint and rear packaging clearly suggest that this is aimed at singles, couples, or couples with smaller kids/pets to transport around.

Still, for a small SUV, the cargo area isn't bad at all. The standard floor depth is fairly generous, with a long and flat loading area, but below that is a narrower yet deeper waterproof area, while under that again is a space-saver spare wheel. Clever. Also intelligent is the luggage cover that lifts automatically with the tailgate, as per Mazda's CX-5.

For the record, cargo capacity is rated at 410 litres with the 60/40 split-fold rear seats erect – or 1170L with them folded down flat. These figures far outstrip the CX-3.

To sum the cabin experience… it's far-better than its Fiesta-sourced dashboard may suggest, while the ST-Line V treatment goes a long way in helping justify the premium. That's a win.

In Australia, the Puma plays in the burgeoning 'Light SUV' segment, so goes up against the ageing yet athletic Mazda CX-3 as well as Honda's HR-V, along with more recent challengers like the Hyundai Venue, Kia Stonic, Nissan Juke II, Toyota Yaris Cross and Volkswagen T-Cross. All are ready to pounce on the bestselling Hiroshima crossover.

What every one of these baby SUVs have in common is that they're based on B-segment – or supermini – platforms. However, prices and sizes do blur in this corner of the class, with larger small-car-derived rivals from the 'Small SUV' segment above, led by the Mitsubishi ASX, Kia Seltos, Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona, also in the Ford's crosshairs.

Formidable opponents indeed, and just like that, the first big hurdle appears for the Blue Oval hopeful. Puma is Light SUV-sized but Small SUV-priced, with the entry-level grade kicking off from a tenner under $30,000, and before on-road costs. That's even more expensive than the VW.

This instantly eliminates it from many buyers' radars.

In contrast, a CX-3 Neo Sport starts from just $22,890. But that's with a manual gearbox, plain interior and steel wheels, whereas the Puma includes a ripper turbo engine/auto combo, climate control, a smartphone app that allows for remote vehicle location/ locking/unlocking/starting, voice-activated sat nav, wireless smartphone charging, lane-departure warning and assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver impairment monitor, 17-inch alloys and a leather steering wheel.

Along with other goodies like AEB with pedestrian alert, reverse camera, Bluetooth audio and telephony, Apple CarPlay/Android auto, digital radio, live traffic updates, fuel-saving engine stop/start, auto headlights, rain-sensing wipers, adaptive cornering fog lights, powered folding mirrors, push-button start and puddle lamps, the Puma looks and feels up-spec inside. To match most of that stuff in the CX-3 you'll need a Maxx Sport auto from $26,890.

Rising to the $32,340 ST-Line drops the Puma's ride height by just 2mm (to 164mm), but adds firmer suspension, a body kit, glitzier alloys, sports seats, a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, flat-bottomed steering wheel, paddle shifters and racier trim for a racier experience, though it loses the climate control for a manual air-con set-up. Strange. This grade might just be the sweet spot in the Ford's range, though it does sit about $1300 higher than the CX-3 sTouring equivalent.

Finally, the subject of this test, the ST-Line V, scores privacy glass, lashings of chrome, keyless entry/start, leather upholstery, climate control, premium audio, a powered tailgate and 18-inch alloys. All for $35,540, it's about on a par with CX-3 Akari, but lacks the latter's powered driver's seat and heated front cushions, among other items. The Mazda also goes one better with a $2000 AWD option from all mid-level grades up, as well as manual availability.

We recommend the $1500 Park Package, which ushers in adaptive cruise control with full stop/go and lane-centring tech, as well as blind-spot detection and auto parking. Premium paint adds $650, a panoramic roof $2000, roof rails $250 and a black roof $500.

Against compelling alternatives costing less, like the high-flying Seltos Sport+, CX-30 G20 Touring and Toyota C-HR Koba, the ST-Line V struggles to make sense on paper. Can the Puma's cabin and driving experience claw back its obvious price disadvantage?

There’s just one engine for the XUV700 for now, a 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder designed in-house at Mahindra.

Power outputs are comparatively impressive at 147kW/380Nm, especially when lined up against the old 2.5-litre non-turbo units powering some rivals.

The power is channelled to the front wheels via a six-speed Aisin-sourced traditional torque converter automatic. For a keen driver this is preferable to a CVT or a dual-clutch, so this sits well with us.

Overseas there is also the option of a 2.2-litre turbo-diesel (136kW/450Nm) with all-wheel drive, but this is yet to materialise for the Australian market.

A multiple international engine-of-the-year winner, the compact and lightweight, 999cc 1.0-litre twin-cam three-cylinder turbo petrol unit is the sole choice for now. Driving the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT), it delivers 92kW of power and 170Nm of torque.

With no all-wheel drive option, there are instead five driving modes – Normal, Sport, Slippery (for snow) and Trail (gravel) applications, working on the traction, stability and transmission algorithms to mimic some of the benefits of AWD. In the ST-Line V, a set of paddle shifters are fitted in lieu of the sadly-absent manual gearbox.

Owners of the previous-shape Fiesta S and EcoSport would be familiar with the 1.0T's smooth and strident performance, though these 2010s models used a completely different type of DCT. This was the highly-publicised Powershift, which consisted of a dry-clutch system, and was prone to a multitude of problems and failures in the petrol-powered auto versions.

In contrast, the Puma adopts a next-generation transmission dubbed 7DCT300; related to the item found in some smaller Mercedes-Benz, Renault and Nissan models, it instead employs a more-robust wet-clutch system with a higher torque threshold, so promises to be far more durable and reliable than the problematic old dry-clutch unit.

Efficiency is officially rated at 8.3L/100km for both XUV700 grades, which is not bad but not great. Understandable for an SUV which weighs in excess of 1800kg powered by a 2.0-litre turbocharged engine.

We didn’t pull an as-tested fuel number this time around as we were hopping in and out of different vehicles, so standby for a more detailed analysis when we have one for a week-long follow-up test.

The fuel tank comes in at 60 litres, for a theoretical range of roughly 723km.

Hoping to hold out for a hybrid? Don’t. Mahindra isn’t working on one. Look to its incoming fully-electric BE sub-brand instead.

The Puma's official combined average fuel consumption figure is just 5.3 litres per 100km, which works out to 121 grams per kilometre. Fitted with a 42-litre fuel tank, the potential range averages out to almost 800km between refills.

Out in the real world, we managed an exceptional 6.2L/100km, no doubt helped by an ever-eager stop/start system (which, annoyingly, kills the air-con when it extinguishes the engine; we found ourselves constantly pressing that 'off' button as the days wore on). This figure was achieved in motorway-heavy driving scenarios, albeit loaded with holiday gear and with the air-con blaring.

So, we took another, urban-focused test, in lots of slow-moving traffic situations, and averaged a still-solid 8.0L/100km.

Note, that while the Puma requires 95 RON premium unleaded, it's also perfectly happy on – and is even recommended by Ford for – the cheapest petrol currently offered in Australia, 94 RON E10 unleaded. Either way, the ST-Line V is a frugal small SUV.

It’s good. Surprised? Me too.

The XUV700 is good to drive in a fundamental way which is not the case for its Chinese rivals. There’s no impending feel of understeer or clumsy dynamics on show. The XUV700 is controlled and solid on the road, with a surprising level of refinement in the cabin.

Visibility is plentiful, and while power from the turbo engine isn’t quite as urgent as the figures initially suggest, it’s more than enough for a family commuter. Even the six-speed transmission is smooth and unobtrusive, unlike many dual-clutch or CVT options in this space. There isn’t even any noisy engine surging, with the unit here feeling refined and distant.

It’s almost ready to duke it out with more established rivals, but there are still flaws. The steering, for example, is very light. This will make it easy to control in low-speed parking situations, but it lacks any kind of feel or feedback at speed.

The ride is comfortable, perfect for its family intentions. Mahindra utilises a multi-chamber system here to achieve unusually competent response over a host of different surfaces, especially rare for a vehicle at this price or in this category. Everything comes at a cost, though, and the cost of this system is a fair bit of body roll in the corners, and a bouncy nature over undulations. 

Fundamentally, though, this car is solid. Nothing proved this more than the brand letting us drive its family SUV on a track at speed. What seems like a silly stunt is an important vote of confidence in the way this car handles, because it’s at track speeds and conditions where all the ugly characteristics will come to the fore.

While it’s certainly no track hero, what was most impressive is despite its rolly suspension and ultra-light steering, there were no major red flags about this car which stood out. It’s solid, and Mahindra knows it. I’d dare MG or GWM to do the same with the HS or H6.

What does all this mean for you? The car has safe road holding and confident dynamics, as well as the comfort for your family. It’s not as razor-sharp as the Japanese or Korean competition, but it’s better than all of its low-cost rivals.

If the Puma's pricing is complicated, its cabin surprising accommodating and its real-world efficiency particularly parsimonious, then the upward trajectory of pros over cons continues with performance that's downright spirited.

Around town first. A small-displacement engine plus a turbo plus a DCT usually spell interminable spells of lag when all the driver longs for is an instant and measured response to a right foot flexing down onto the throttle.

But the Ford largely sidesteps such pitfalls. Though momentarily hesitant at take-off, the three-pot turbo does then get down to business in no time, with a sustained and satisfying surge of thrust as the revs grow, accompanied by a lusty and raspy thrum that's entirely in keeping with the Puma's track-pants appearance. And it doesn't let up either, with speed building up strongly through the gears, and much more so than the mere 999ccs suggest. Great for overtaking, or taking over a rapidly diminishing gap in the peak-hour derby.

Selecting Sport (a fiddly action that's located too far from the driver for safe eyes-on-the-road operation) lights an even bigger fire in the Puma's belly, with punchier acceleration and a very attentive transmission tune, slicing seamlessly through the seven ratios, leaving you in awe that a heart so small can possess such deep lungs.

Where the Ford really leaves an indelible mark is its enthusiasm to corner just as keenly, armed with brilliantly slick steering and a planted chassis that is set up to both encourage and interact with the driver. Minimal body roll and lots of grip from a quality quartet of Continental tyres ensure the Puma can be punted about like a sporty little hatchback, while the electronic safety tech allowing just enough leeway for lots of fun before they gently reel everything back into line.

We cannot think of a more enjoyable small SUV. And, by the way, those same driver-assist systems provide exceptionally nuanced lane-keep and adaptive cruise-control intervention – certainly they're right up there with the premium SUV brigade.

Given that our Puma wore 215/50R18 rubber, on a 'sports' suspension tune, the ride around town is commendable, with ample cushioning from the rough stuff. There is some tautness to the ride, but it isn't hard or rough; the ST-Line V walks a fine line between urban-agility and surface-decay isolation. In other words, it's commendably relaxing to travel in.

At higher speeds, some road and tyre noises do permeate through inside, and those Dumbo door mirrors do create some wind whoosh, but overall, given how dynamic the chassis is, the Puma feels grown up and sophisticated.

Tested under the 2019 Euro NCAP crash-test regime, the Puma scores a top five-star ANCAP rating.

However, this means it does not meet the more stringent frontal offset crash, side impact crash and far-side impact crash-test criteria introduced by ANCAP for 2020 model-year vehicles – despite launching in September of that year.

Safety items include dual front, front-seat side and side curtain airbags (six in total), AEB with pedestrian and cyclist detection (working between 7km/h and 80km/h), lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver fatigue alert, rear parking sensors, tyre pressure monitors and emergency assistance. These come on top of anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist, stability control and traction control.

As mentioned earlier, adaptive cruise control, active park assistance, front parking sensors and blind-spot detection are part of the $1500 'Park Package'. Do it.

Seven years of warranty is a good start, and has Mahindra joining an increasingly large club of challenger brands which are following in the footsteps of Kia by offering above-average coverage in this department. Mahindra’s version only covers the first 150,000km of distance, but there’s seven-years of roadside assist, too.

At the time of writing, Mahindra was yet to land on service pricing. This could be the last piece of the puzzle for some buyers. The XUV700 needs to be serviced once every 12 months or 10,000km.

Ford offers the industry-average warranty of five-years/unlimited kilometres. Services intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km.

There is also a capped-price servicing scheme under the 'Ford Service Benefits' banner, with the first four years/60,000km of 'A and B' logbook services pegged at $299 per visit, and then between $320 and $560, for up to 12 years.

There is also a Ford loan car program, SYNC 3 map updates and Motoring Club Membership included during that time frame.