Mahindra XUV700 vs Ford Escape

What's the difference?

We love a car which subverts expectations, and for the most part, the XUV700 has managed to. It feels like the brand has leapt over a few steps when it comes to design, quality, and particularly drivability, which bodes well when you combine it with a bargain price, a good equipment list and solid packaging.

The question is: Does the Australian market have room for yet another value player in a space already so well occupied by Chinese newcomers? Only time will tell.

The Ford Escape PHEV is a good option for a customer who knows they’ll live within the parameters set by the car. That’s the case with any plug-in hybrid, really, so in that regard, this new model is hardly a standout.

And it isn’t particularly outstanding in any other way either. I personally would have appreciated it if Ford had decided to add the plug-in powertrain to the Vignale flagship model instead - that model is more about luxury than sportiness, and would better fit the character of this powertrain in my opinion.

It’s a decent addition to the brand’s SUV range, and a welcome one to the segment, though it won’t be on its own for long.

The XUV700 is a clean-sheet design on an all-new platform and it shows. There are still echoes of the past in this SUVs bodywork, with the raised rear haunches and traditional Mahindra-shaped grille, but it feels like it’s taken a massive leap into the 21st century this time around.

It has a strong modern flavour and presence on the road, which doesn’t feel more than a generation behind like previous Mahindra offerings. Gone are the awkward curves and frumpy edges of its predecessors, and instead we’re welcomed by a more refined face, nipped and tucked rear with sporty touches, tough haunches and a contemporary overall look.

Inside the most dramatic upgrades have been deployed, including the impressive digital suite, seemingly decent software with a quick, responsive, and customisable instrument cluster, a new more attractive steering wheel, and a much smoother flow and coherency to design which we haven’t seen before from the Indian giant.

There are only a handful of areas, like the dorky elongated shifter, some hard plastics in the doors and atop the shapely dash, and the manual handbrake in the base car to remind you of its bargain price-point and origins.

It’s nice these attributes unite for an uncontroversial and modern overall feel, and quality is feeling on-par, but it’s also hardly original.

The headlights and steering wheel look like they could be worn by any Renault, the tail-lights look like they belong on a Nissan, and the dual-screen dash and door-mounted electric seat controls are clearly meant to emulate Mercedes.

Actually, one for the switchgear nerds, the function stalks are from the SsangYong parts bin, a holdover from when Mahindra owned the Korean automaker. Still, if you’re going to take inspiration, I can think of worse places to take it from, and it’s frankly remarkable all these pieces of inspiration fall together so well.

I haven’t really warmed to the “I wish I was a hatchback” styling of the Escape, which has a softer-edged look to it than most of its rivals. I mean, compared to a Hyundai Tucson or Toyota RAV4, the Escape looks like a blob.

That mightn’t be an issue for you, and it’s hardly a reason not to buy the car, but I was also a bit disappointed that there’s no real specific highlights to make you realise you’re buying the PHEV model, which - at $15,000 more than the equivalent petrol version - should have something to differentiate it other than the addition of a small badge and the additional filler cap on the front quarter panel for the plug.

Even a different set of wheels would have sufficed. Alas, it’s an identical looking Escape to the petrol. That means the ST-Line trimmings, such as black highlights on the grille and bumper, side skirts, a rear spoiler, and those 18-inch wheels and lowered sports suspension.

The interior, as mentioned in the pricing section, does have a few changes over the petrol version, but they’re hardly game-changing additions.

Low-cost options in the mid-size SUV space usually get a bunch of basic stuff wrong. Laggy, ugly software, for example, is prevalent in the MG HS, while clumsy switchgear takes away from the Haval H6, and a particularly awkward driving position is notable in the LDV D90.

Mahindra’s XUV700 does not fall into these traps. The front seat feels spacious and airy, the seating position is high but not unsettling, and the thing which took me aback the most is the way everything works.

It’s a little annoying the base car gets no telescopic adjust and misses out on a second bottle holder because of the manual handbrake, but other than this, the ergonomics in the cabin are solid. A centre dial, for example, can be switched from navigation controls to function as a volume dial if desired, and there are plenty of shortcut buttons for the multimedia and the dual-zone climate making it a breeze to adjust things on the move.

For storage there is a large bottle holder and map pocket in each door, a large bottle holder (two in the case of the AX7L) in the centre, a bay under the climate unit good for phones and wallets (it is a wireless charging pad in the AX7L), and there’s a deep armrest console box between the front occupants.

The second row is also airy and spacious, with a nearly flat floor making even the centre position seemingly suitable for an adult. Behind my own seating position I had plenty of space at 182cm tall, and there are a set of adjustable air vents plus a slot for a phone, a USB-C charging outlet, and large bottle holders in the doors.

The third row? It’s not bad, but I’ve sat in better. The left-hand side second-row seat folds up and rolls forward, making access better than some of its rivals, but behind the second row my knees are hard up against the seat in front, and my head is touching the roof. There’s decent amenity; a bottle holder on each side and an adjustable air vent with a fan controller, but this is a space best left for kids.

Mahindra doesn’t have an official boot capacity number to give us yet, but predicts it will be over 700 litres given the dimensions. With the third-row folded it looks cavernous, but with it deployed you’ll be lucky to get a day bag in behind.

For those interested in towing, the XUV700 can tow a 1500kg braked trailer (750kg unbraked) and there’s halfway decent ground clearance, at 196mm.

The Ford Escape looks like it has all the bits to make a midsize SUV buyer happy. And while a fair few of the boxes are ticked, there are some elements that could be better. 

The big party trick is that the second row is on rails, so you can slide it forwards or backwards to improve the space for receipt occupants or improve your boot space. The maximised cargo area is 556 litres to the ceiling, while if prioritise second-row occupant space there is easily enough room for a 182cm / 6’0” adult to fit behind someone of a similar size.

In the boot there are remote levers for the second row seats to fold down, a 12 V outlet, and a soft parcel shelf which is easy to remove, too.

During my time with the car I had the seats slid back as far as they go to maximise cabin space, though I did test out whether it was worth having them forward and the boot space was appreciably better especially for a pram and some baby stuff.

The second-row is a 60:40 split for the backrest, with the smaller portion on the driver’s side. That may sound trivial, but we had our baby seat set up behind the passenger, and had to move it to the driver’s side when we picked up a large parcel as it wouldn’t fit with the smaller portion folded down. There are dual ISOFIX child seat anchor points for the outboard positions, and three top-tether hooks.

The boot space is good too, considering it has some extra hardware to contend with under the body, there is also a space-saver spare wheel under there which is nice. However, there is no dedicated hidey hole for the charge cable, and it doesn’t come in a nice stowable bag either - just a plastic ziplock thing. 

Perhaps the biggest letdown of the interior is the fact that you still get the tiny little tablet-style 8.0-inch touchscreen media display, despite there being a big 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster. The two screens almost look at odds with one another, and what’s even more frustrating is that the driver information screen cannot be configured to include the energy flow screen that you see on the smaller tablet style unit. 

That means you can’t watch what’s happening between engine, electric motor and battery, or a combination where you might expect to see that - instead it can only be seen in illustrative form on the smaller central screen. Big issue? Maybe not, but if you’re an eco-conscious customer who wants to know what their car’s high-tech powertrain is doing, while also wanting to use sat nav, or Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, or change the radio station… Well, you’re out of luck.

There is a much more basic and rudimentary display on the driver info screen that shows a small icon of an engine and battery and illuminates them when each part is in use, but really, Ford should have used the real-estate of the big driver info screen better. Toyota, Kia and Hyundai know how to do it better.

The material quality is okay, but it certainly doesn’t feel like a very special environment.There are rubberised liners on the doors which don’t look terrific or feel fantastic, and why there are soft plastic elbow pads, and up high on the dashboard, it is not of the most pristine quality. 

Storage is pretty good. There are bottle holders in the doors and two cupholders in the centre console, and the storage nook in front of the shift dial houses a wireless phone charger and two USB ports, plus a 12-volt plug. There is a strange little shelf section in front of the centre console bin, which is not fantastic in terms of size. There are rear bottle holders in the doors, map pockets and a flip-down arm-rest with cup holders.

That rotary dial shifter which does take a little bit of getting used to. Unlike some others, there is no ‘P’ for park button - instead you have to dial it all the way left. 

It’s hard to consider the Ford Escape ST-Line PHEV to be tremendous value with a price tag of $53,440 (MSRP), especially considering it attracts a circa-$15k premium over the equivalent petrol-powered ST-Line version of the Escape. And that price will rise once more from July 1, to $54,440, as Ford says it will increase the ask due to “continued material and freight cost increases”. 

But it does offer a few little extras over that petrol model in terms of standard gear, including partial-leather seat trim, a 10-way power-adjustable driver’s seat, and a 10-speaker sound system. That’s in addition to the standard kit you’d find on any ST-Line Escape, which includes 18-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights, sporty-looking front and rear bumpers, lower suspension, keyless entry and push-button start, wireless phone charging, a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, flat-bottom steering wheel, Ford’s 8.0-inch touchscreen media system with sat nav, digital radio, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, and also a reversing camera and front and rear parking sensors.

There are plenty of other safety inclusions that you’d expect at this price point - check the safety breakdown below for more info.

If you need additional gear to make your ST-Line feel even more special, you can choose the ST-Line Pack option, which adds a power tailgate, heated front seats and matrix-style adaptive LED headlights. That pack costs $1950. Really, it shouldn’t be an option on this top-dollar Escape.

Other plug-in hybrid models close to the Escape PHEV include the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug-in Hybrid EV (starting from $46,990), but it’s a fair bit smaller, and so is the Kia Niro PHEV (from $46,590). 

In the same size bracket as the Escape, there’s only the still-to-arrive Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV (likely to be $60,000 or more) and the MG HS Plus EV, which kicks off at $46,990 drive-away. Soon there’ll be the Mazda CX-60 PHEV, but it’ll likely play closer to the Kia Sorento PHEV (which kicks off at $80,330).

In short, there’s not too much competition, and that could play to the Escape’s advantage. But does it deliver real-world fuel economy savings that you can’t get with, say, a Toyota RAV4 Hybrid (from $36,900)? More on that below.

If your curious about colours, there are three no-cost options - Frozen White, Blazer Blue and Agate Black - while the optional premium paint options include Blue Metallic, Magnetic grey, Solar Silver, White Platinum and Rapid Red, as seen in this review, all of which will add $650 to the bill.

There’s just one engine for the XUV700 for now, a 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder designed in-house at Mahindra.

Power outputs are comparatively impressive at 147kW/380Nm, especially when lined up against the old 2.5-litre non-turbo units powering some rivals.

The power is channelled to the front wheels via a six-speed Aisin-sourced traditional torque converter automatic. For a keen driver this is preferable to a CVT or a dual-clutch, so this sits well with us.

Overseas there is also the option of a 2.2-litre turbo-diesel (136kW/450Nm) with all-wheel drive, but this is yet to materialise for the Australian market.

The Escape PHEV is the only model in the range to get a 2.5-litre petrol engine, which runs on the more efficient Atkinson cycle, and has a continuously variable transmission feeding power to the front wheels - that’s right, this Escape is 2WD/FWD.

The tricky bit is that it also houses a clever electric motor and generator, which is teamed to a 14.4kWh battery pack - which is big for a plug-in hybrid car. 

The electric motor is capable of 96kW of power, while the petrol engine can produce up to 112kW. All told, the combined system output is pegged at 167kW, though there is no peak torque output figure. Even so, that amount of power is a sizeable number for any midsize SUV, even if this particular one weighs in at more than 1800kg.

Speaking of weight, the PHEV is the least capable towing vehicle in the Escape range. It has a maximum braked towing capacity of 1200kg, where all the others can tow up to 1800kg. Unbraked capacity is unchanged, at 750kg.

Efficiency is officially rated at 8.3L/100km for both XUV700 grades, which is not bad but not great. Understandable for an SUV which weighs in excess of 1800kg powered by a 2.0-litre turbocharged engine.

We didn’t pull an as-tested fuel number this time around as we were hopping in and out of different vehicles, so standby for a more detailed analysis when we have one for a week-long follow-up test.

The fuel tank comes in at 60 litres, for a theoretical range of roughly 723km.

Hoping to hold out for a hybrid? Don’t. Mahindra isn’t working on one. Look to its incoming fully-electric BE sub-brand instead.

Beware the PHEV fuel consumption figure. That’s a great thing to keep in mind if you’re shopping for one of these cars.

That’s because the combined cycle official figure only takes into account a mix of conditions across 100km of driving. That’s right - only the first 100km. So the best case scenario, for a car that is designed to use its battery to run emissions free until it runs out, before sparingly using the petrol engine to keep going.

As such, it is no surprise that the official combined cycle fuel consumption is just 1.5 litres per 100 kilometres, with CO2 emissions claimed at just 33g/km. That takes into account the WLTP battery range of 56 kilometres stated on Ford’s website.

For reference, I completed my test of the car with a total of 462.7 kilometres travelled, of which, the trip computer stated 292.3km was fully electric. Meaning the remaining 170.4km was driving using petrol.

The indicated energy efficiency was 20.0kWh/100km, which isn’t great against a claimed EV driving efficiency figure supplied by Ford, of 14.8kWh/100km to 15.6kWh/100km. 

While the indicated fuel consumption average was 3.1L/100km, so more than double the windscreen sticker’s indicated economy. 

However, when I did the maths, I used a real-world average of 3.9L/100km of petrol ($36.15 worth of petrol) and 43.2kWh of electricity (meaning a cost of $9.82 based on the NSW average energy price of $0.2274c/kWh).

So, to do 462.7km I paid $45.97. I think that’s okay, but bear in mind I included several longer trips (Sydney to Glenbrook, Glenbrook to the Southern Highlands and back, and Glenbrook to Sydney and back). 

As is always the case, if your intended operation for a PHEV is to use it primarily for urban running within its EV range capabilities, you will be better off than if you push it beyond and use the petrol engine excessively.

For reference, the fuel tank size is 45 litres, which is 12L less than the petrol-only versions. It can run on E10, but only if you can find E10 that is also 95RON premium unleaded.

If you wish, there’s also an app called Ford Pass Connect, which allows you to monitor your car’s state of charge, adjust its start and finish times for recharging and even works as a key for the car to allow remote access, too.

Worth noting the maximum charge rate on a 10-amp plug at home is 2.3kW, while on public charging (which typically runs a higher amperage rate) the max rate is 3.7kW.

It’s good. Surprised? Me too.

The XUV700 is good to drive in a fundamental way which is not the case for its Chinese rivals. There’s no impending feel of understeer or clumsy dynamics on show. The XUV700 is controlled and solid on the road, with a surprising level of refinement in the cabin.

Visibility is plentiful, and while power from the turbo engine isn’t quite as urgent as the figures initially suggest, it’s more than enough for a family commuter. Even the six-speed transmission is smooth and unobtrusive, unlike many dual-clutch or CVT options in this space. There isn’t even any noisy engine surging, with the unit here feeling refined and distant.

It’s almost ready to duke it out with more established rivals, but there are still flaws. The steering, for example, is very light. This will make it easy to control in low-speed parking situations, but it lacks any kind of feel or feedback at speed.

The ride is comfortable, perfect for its family intentions. Mahindra utilises a multi-chamber system here to achieve unusually competent response over a host of different surfaces, especially rare for a vehicle at this price or in this category. Everything comes at a cost, though, and the cost of this system is a fair bit of body roll in the corners, and a bouncy nature over undulations. 

Fundamentally, though, this car is solid. Nothing proved this more than the brand letting us drive its family SUV on a track at speed. What seems like a silly stunt is an important vote of confidence in the way this car handles, because it’s at track speeds and conditions where all the ugly characteristics will come to the fore.

While it’s certainly no track hero, what was most impressive is despite its rolly suspension and ultra-light steering, there were no major red flags about this car which stood out. It’s solid, and Mahindra knows it. I’d dare MG or GWM to do the same with the HS or H6.

What does all this mean for you? The car has safe road holding and confident dynamics, as well as the comfort for your family. It’s not as razor-sharp as the Japanese or Korean competition, but it’s better than all of its low-cost rivals.

Being the ST-Line grade, you - like it or not - have to deal with the lowered ride and sportier suspension, which makes this car ride a bit more firmly than you might want.

I found the suspension to be the biggest detracting element in terms of the drive experience – the suspension picked up a lot of the small inconsistencies in the road surface and transmitted them into the cabin. It was fidgety a lot of the time, and on road surfaces with very poor quality, it could be a bit uncomfortable.

The steering was also bit too tuned for sportiness for a car that doesn’t really need to be quite so aggressively angled that way. It took a bit of getting used to – it was somehow both twitchy on centre but not quite as responsive across the radius of lock to lock as I’d thought it might be, given the initial steering response.

Having said all that, I threw it through a couple of twisty corners and there was a nice handling balance from the chassis and decent grip from the tyres, but I did notice that - being front-wheel drive, with all that power going through the front tyres, there were some instances of it scrabbling for traction, notably on wet roads and looser surfaces but also out of offset driveways.

Other gripes included brake pedal response that was quite abrupt and very sensitive to stopping inputs.

Now, let’s consider the driving modes.

There are different drivetrain setups depending on what you plan to do. EV Auto does the thinking for you, dipping between EV, hybrid and petrol modes. EV Now prioritises electric driving. EV Later saves your battery charge for when you think you’ll need it. And EV Charge means you’ll use petrol power to drive, and also to replenish the battery pack.

The throttle response was decent in EV mode, and in hybrid mode it is nice and quiet, and it drives in a very smooth way unless you really plant your foot hard, then it can be a bit vocal - but less raucous than a RAV4 under full throttle. 

The transition between the different drive modes was relatively seamless, as it will readily go between petrol or electric as required, and the four-cylinder is mostly hushed enough so that you won’t hear it too much, especially if you’re driving at higher speeds when it does.

Indeed it was relatively quiet for the most part, though the tyre noise was quite excessive at higher speeds on very coarse-chip surfaces. And in those instances I noticed I could feel the road surface through the steering wheel and the suspension, as it was quite jittery at times.

There is a low speed warning sound that is omitted below about 25km/h and it was quite handy while driving in enclosed car parks - no more accusations of creeping around silently at the shops.

Further, there are multiple drive modes, including Normal, Eco, Sport, Slippery, and Snow/Sand Assist, all of which are designed to make different situations easier to deal with. They will adjust engine transmission and steering response as well as stability and traction control limitations. I kept it in Normal, though a dabble in Sport showed that you’re allowed a bit more aggression from the powertrain in terms of acceleration.

Standard safety equipment for the Escape PHEV is on par with the majority of rivals in the class.

It has front autonomous emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian detection (not cyclist detection, though), adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning and lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert, driver fatigue monitoring, traffic sign recognition and a rear-seat occupant reminder system that’ll chime in to tell you to check the back seat before you get out.

There are six airbags - dual front, front side and full-length curtain airbags, but unlike some newer rivals there is no front centre airbag to prevent head clashes.

Seven years of warranty is a good start, and has Mahindra joining an increasingly large club of challenger brands which are following in the footsteps of Kia by offering above-average coverage in this department. Mahindra’s version only covers the first 150,000km of distance, but there’s seven-years of roadside assist, too.

At the time of writing, Mahindra was yet to land on service pricing. This could be the last piece of the puzzle for some buyers. The XUV700 needs to be serviced once every 12 months or 10,000km.

As with the rest of the Ford range, you get a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty on the car, while the battery pack has its own eight-year/160,000km warranty plan.

And just like most other models in Ford’s range, there is a lifetime capped-price servicing plan, with the first four maintenance visits (due every 12 months/15,000km, whichever occurs first) incurring a $299 fee, which is cheap for the class.

You also get up to seven years of roadside assist if you service your car with Ford’s dealers.