Ford Ranger vs Ford F150

What's the difference?

Our time with the new Ranger was limited in terms of distance driven and the number of variants we could sample. We were also unable to test the vehicle with a trailer attached, so we’re unsure as to how well the new, lower-powered engine will cope with towing duties.

We do know the new engine is being welcomed by owners and fleets who held concerns over the technical layout of the previous 2.0-litre powerplant, but only time will tell if the reduced performance is seen as being balanced by the technical upgrades.

We can also tell you there’s nothing inherently wrong with the new 2.0L in the context of normal driving on normal roads and its refinement is still an improvement on a lot of its competitors’ offerings.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

The Ford F-150 Platinum SWB is good but not great.

It has plenty of standard features onboard and some handy touches, it’s nice to drive on-road, and is adequately capable off-road but it lacks the overall plushness its price-tag promises.

The F-150’s smaller sibling, the Ranger Super Duty, does all of this F Truck’s jobs better, has more general appeal and all-round driveability, and it costs much less than the F-150.

Yet I can still see the appeal of the Ford F-150 Platinum SWB. As a potential purchase, it might make a lot more sense to you than me.

Here’s a classic case of leaving well enough alone. Having figured out for sure that the Ranger’s looks weren’t costing it any sales whatsoever, Ford wisely decided to spend the facelift money where it counted most; under the bonnet.

If you have sharp eyes, you might pick the dark highlights replacing the chrome finish on some models, the new wheel designs and a couple of new hero colours for specific variants.

Beyond that, those big, bold, bluff looks continue with more than the odd nod to the US-market pick-ups that seem to inspire so many ute buyers in this country.

Inside it’s the same story, with those fabulous interior door handles that are so easy to use continuing and everything else remaining very, very Ranger-ish.

The Ford F-150 Platinum SWB is 5908mm long (with a 3697mm wheelbase), 2089mm wide (excluding mirrors) and 1995mm high. It has a listed kerb weight of 2611kg.

It’s a chunky but stretched US-style ute with ample presence, but manages to look like it’s not trying too hard.

It doesn’t hurt this ute’s cause that its appearance now encompasses model year 2024 updates from the US, which include a facelifted exterior with a new front bumper, grille and headlights, as well as a new rear bumper, tail-lights, and gloss-black alloy wheels.

The wheel-and-tyre package (20-inch alloys and 275/60R20 Hankook Dynapro AT2 all-terrains) suit its style, but aren’t particularly great for off-roading – more about that later.

Inside, it’s a cool and practical space with leather-accented seats – those are underdone in terms of feeling posh – and there’s an overall roominess that’s difficult not to like.

In terms of design, this F-150 holds its own, inside and out, against the likes of the Ram, Silverado, and Tundra.

Despite the lower-tech new engine and its power losses compared with its predecessor, the 2.0-litre Ranger in dual-cab 4X4 form retains its full 3.5-tonne towing capacity.

Sticking with towing, if you option up the Touring Pack, the Ranger gets Ford’s 'Trailer Reversing Guidance' which uses cameras and the rotary drive-mode dial to allow the driver to take the hassle out of trailer reversing. Up to a point, anyway. But there’s also a great check-list menu on the info-screen to detect failed trailer lighting and other problems. The Touring Pack is now standard on many versions but still optional of cheaper variants.

Which ever version you buy, any dual-cab 4X4 Ranger styleside has a tub measuring 1547mm long, 1584 wide, 1224mm between the wheel arches (to accept a standard pallet) and a loading height of 816mm. The tub also features inner tie-down rails, a light, a tailgate-lift assist ram and cupholders moulded into the tailgate’s inner side.

Payloads for the various Ranger models are determined by kerb mass, which means the lightest variant, the XL can carry 1135kg, while the heaviest, the Platinum, is restricted to 981kg. Still a decent figure, to be honest.

Inside, the Ranger’s cabin ranges from the starkly utilitarian in the XL (vinyl floor mats and cloth seats to name just a couple of features) to extremely plush in the case of the Platinum with its four USB ports, wireless phone charging and even a row of six switch blanks ready for aftermarket accessories.

The front seating is definitely superior to the rear seat in the Ranger, and the latter features a fairly flat cushion and a backrest.

Lesser versions of the Ranger also get a conventional park-brake compared with the electronic one on more expensive models. We’ll take the manual version any day.

All in all, the Ford F-150 Platinum’s cabin is a highly practical space.

The 12-way power-adjustable, heated and ventilated front seats (with a handy massage function and memory) recline to a fully flat position and the fold-down centre console work table is a nice touch as is the auto shifter, which stows away flush at the push of a nearby button.

Even though I prefer a vertically oriented screen nowadays, the F-150’s horizontal 12.0-inch LCD touchscreen is easy to use and offers clear, crisp colours so my old codger eyes can cope with the vast array of information and controls depicted onscreen.

The rest of the cabin is as roomy and as practical as can be expected in a dual-cab ute of this size. There are storage spaces and cupholders aplenty, as well as smart device charging points front and rear.

The 60/40 split rear seat even has a shallow lockable under-seat storage.

This F-150’s tub is 1700mm long, 1650mm wide, 543mm deep and measures 1285mm between the wheel arches so it will fit an Aussie pallet or a truckload of your camping equipment.

The tub has a tri-fold hard tonneau cover and the load space has a 12-volt outlet, load box lights, a durable-looking spray-in tub liner, as well as fixed tie-down points at each corner and four sidewall-mounted tie-down points as part of Ford’s BoxLink tie-down system.

The powered tailgate can be opened the usual boring drop-down way or you can use the 'Pro Access Swing Door' of the tailgate to open a side-hinged section as you would a door.

Bonus points for the raised ruler markings on the tailgate’s inner wall and the two G-clamp fitting positions at each side of the tailgate’s top edge.

The F-150 has a keyless entry system with a keypad on the exterior of the front passenger door. Punch in your permanent access code and – bingo – you’re in.

As practical as any of its rivals, the F-150 stays in the race here.

The new Ford F-150 Platinum SWB and long-wheelbase (LWB) body styles are priced from $163,950 (excluding on-road costs), making this top-spec F truck the most expensive yet.

In fact, it comes in at pricier than rivals Ram 1500 and Chevrolet Silverado, but not as much of a hit to the bank account as the Toyota Tundra is.

Also, the “new” F-150s now on offer in Australia are actually the model year 2024 versions of this vehicle.

Standard features onboard the Platinum include a 12.0-inch LCD portrait touchscreen, 12.0-inch digital instrument cluster, a 14-speaker Bang & Olufsen audio system, folding gear shifter, fold-out centre console, leather upholstery, 12-way power-adjustable heated and ventilated front seats (with memory and massage functions), and heated outboard rear seats.

It also gets power side steps, 20-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights and tail-lights, panoramic glass sunroof, spray-in bed-liner and a powered tailgate with a manual swing-door section.

Exterior paint choices include Agate Black, Iconic Silver, Rapid Red, Carbonised Grey, Star White, and Antimatter Blue.

This F-150 matches its rivals, such as the Ram 1500, Chevrolet Silverado, and even the more expensive Toyota Tundra, in terms of standard features.

While the V6 turbo-diesel remains unchanged with its 184kW and mighty 600Nm of torque. It remains paired with the 10-speed automatic transmission and the availability of a '4-Auto' setting for the drive system which allows for the use of all-wheel drive on dry bitumen.

The big change to the V6’s status is that it’s now available across the entire dual-cab 4X4 range, right down to the XL version with its rubber floor mats and steel wheels.

Now, if you were cynical, you might suggest Ford has made the V6 more widely available, because the four-cylinder engine option (once the only one available on lesser versions like the XL) has lost a bit of mojo in the transition to Ranger 2026.5.

The thought of a carmaker going backwards on specification and output for an engine goes against the grain somewhat, but in this case, the move to a simpler, potentially more robust engine design makes some sense in the context of long-term ownership costs.

Opinions are divided on how many of the previous 2.0-litre engines posed problems for their buyers, but the fact remains that the wet timing belt (where the rubber belt runs in an oil bath) design had a less-than-perfect track record here and abroad. And even if failures were only a small percentage of units sold, when that failure happens to you, it’s a 100 per cent failure rate…

So, Ford has re-engineered the 2.0-litre unit to use an utterly conventional timing chain, designed new pistons, a different fuel-injection system and reduced the turbocharger count from two to one. The theory is the more robust timing chain will reduce problems, while the single-turbo installation will save money at a production level. In the process, however, both power and torque outputs have fallen. In this case, the bi-turbo engine’s 154kW and 500Nm have fallen to 125kW and 405Nm respectively in the new engine.

Payloads and towing capacity have not been affected (the Ranger can still tow 3500kg) but there’s speculation that 125kW won’t drag a huge trailer around with the same ease as the old engine, even with the 10-speed automatic that’s fitted. Hence the V6 being made available across the board. Allegedly.

The counterpoint is that Ford has dropped the final-dive ratio of the 2.0-litre Rangers which should help with in-gear flexibility and acceleration.

The 2.0-litre-engined Rangers also lack the 4-Auto setting and operate in two-wheel drive mode exclusively on bitumen.

The Ford F-150 Platinum has a 3.5-litre twin-turbo V6 engine producing 298kW at 6000rpm and 678Nm at 3100rpm, and that’s matched to a 10-speed torque converter automatic transmission.

The base-spec XLT gets part-time 4WD but the Lariat and Platinum grades get Ford’s more advanced full-time 4WD system. This setup has selectable two-wheel drive (2H), four-wheel drive high-range (4H), four-wheel drive low-range (4L) and four-wheel drive automatic (4A = 4Auto) that sends drive to the front and rear axles as needed, and which can be safely used on high-traction surfaces, such as bitumen.

The Platinum has a variety of selectable drive modes – including Normal, Eco, Sport, Tow/Haul, Slippery, and Off-Road – and an electronic locking rear diff.

This is a proven engine-and-auto pairing and is more than a match for any of the F-150’s rivals’ powertrains.

Ford claims a combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel economy figure of 6.8 litres per 100km for the new 2.0-litre engine. We didn’t get too close to that, but that’s hardly surprising given real-world figures almost never match the official test figure. Rather, we managed 8.2L/100km in mainly relaxed country driving and about 9.5L/100km with a little peak hour traffic thrown into the mix. Either way, the Ranger should be pretty frugal.

The real question mark crops up when you hook a bobcat and tandem trailer to the tow-bar. We’ll have to wait and see how that affects economy on the 'little' Ranger engine.

Meantime, those real-world figures, combined with the Ford’s 80-litre fuel tank, mean a typical range of something like 800 to 900km between visits to the service-station.

And while you might be thinking a newly-developed, modern turbo-diesel would need AdBlue, the 2.0-litre as fitted to the Ranger line-up does not.

Official fuel consumption is listed as 13.4L/100km (combined).

On test I recorded 14.1L/100km, but that figure included a solid half-day of off-roading.

Based on my on-test figures, a full tank (136 litres) of unleaded petrol in this F-150 will get you a driving range of about 965km.

For a big ute, it exhibits reasonable fuel usage.

Since Ford has made no changes to suspension, steering, tyre specifications or braking hardware, it’s no surprise to find that the new version feels very familiar.

The V6 variants remain something of a revelation after some of the competitors’ four-cylinder engines, and the sophistication and refinement comes through immediately with the V6 slurring away at its upshifts and generally feeling like a high-end solution to a dual-cab propulsion problem.

But of course, we knew that, didn’t we? Exactly, so the big questions surround the new 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel with its new specification and downgraded outputs. Specifically, can 125kW and 405Nm cut it in this cut-throat market?

The initial answer appears to be yes. In fact, when you consider that not every dual-cab owner tows three-and-a-half tonnes with one, you can see why a smaller, more frugal engine might do the job. And there’s always the optional V6 if the job demands it, right?

Acceleration is nothing like the V6’s of course, but the new four-cylinder rolls along at highway speeds without a problem and can still accelerate to overtake. That’s largely a function of having 10 gears and a lower final-drive ratio, but the latter doesn’t seem to have made the engine feel manic or short-geared in any way.

Normal overtaking ranges, say, 70km/h to 100km/h feature lots of mid-range and it’s only when you wring the new engine out that it starts to feel a little puny at the top end. But it never fails to impress with its refined feel and fairly low noise levels and, if nothing else, it proves that smaller capacity four-cylinder engines have an inherent advantage in being smoother and silkier to rev than some of the big bangers out there.

Perhaps if you jumped straight from the outgoing bi-turbo variant into the new single-turbo Ranger, you might notice a decent fall-off in performance, but if you’d never driven a bi-turbo, you’ll never dismiss the new engine as anything other than completely adequate.

The caveat to all that is when we get to hitch a big load to the new Ranger and see what a couple or three tonnes does to that apparent adequacy.

From the get-go, this short-wheelbase F-150 is a smooth driving ute on road.

And the V6 offers a welcome low-level rumble as a soundtrack to your driving experience. Nice.

It’s a big vehicle with a steel ladder-frame chassis and a lengthy wheelbase, but it suits our conditions, especially with Aussie-tuned steering, impressive on-road ride and handling and its new continuously controlled adaptive dampers setup works in conjunction with the Terrain Management System and is claimed “to enhance vehicle control on every surface”, according to Ford Australia.

This system does iron out much of the jarring sharpness often felt in test vehicles along chopped-up back-country roads on the way to my unofficial 4WD proving ground.

F-150s are imported to Australia from the USA as left-hand-drive vehicles and reengineered to right-hand drive by Melbourne-based RMA Automotive, at the company’s production facility in Melbourne.

The utes undergo a comprehensive transformation – including changes to steering, driver displays, air-con, as well as software upgrades, to name but a few – aimed at making them capable of excelling in Aussie conditions.

And it does excel.

This F-150 is well controlled with a planted feel on sealed surfaces, the steering has a nice weight to it in all conditions, acceleration is smooth, and the 10-speed auto delivers clever management of this big ute.

It’s very quiet and comfortable in the cabin. You can just barely register the low-level rumble of the twin-turbocharged V6 as you truck along stretches of highway and rural back roads.

On-road, the F-150 is a near-perfect open-road touring vehicle. The bonus is, as a Platinum driver, you have access to a suite of driver-assist tech which includes modes aimed at making the task of 4WDing (Off-Road) and towing (Tow/Haul) safer, more controlled and, consequently, more enjoyable than it otherwise may be.

Much better suited to towing and hauling than 4WDing, the F-150 still makes a good fist of it, but it does have off-road limitations.

It has to be driven with consideration, and you have to understand and appreciate the off-road parameters in which this F-150 performs best. If you drive anything more severe than light-to-medium-duty off-roading, then you risk damage.

Otherwise, visibility is great, the driving position is commanding, steering at low speeds is well-weighted and precise, and throttle response is impressive.

Again, this is a big ute so it has off-road angles you’d expect for a vehicle this large: the approach angle is listed as 24.5 degrees, departure angle is 25.3 and ramp-over is 20 degrees.

Ground clearance is listed as 239mm and wading depth is 700mm. Bash plates do offer the front differential, transfer case and fuel tank some protection though.

The tyres – Hankook Dynapro AT2 all-terrains (275/60R20) – aren’t well suited to 4WDing, but more aggressive all-terrain tyres on an 18-inch rim and an aftermarket suspension lift would go some of the way to help sort out the F-150’s off-road issues with its less-than-ideal showroom-standard rubber, only adequate ground clearance and off-road angles.

For such a big ute, payload is an underwhelming 704kg. For reference, the Ram 1500 (878kg) and Chevrolet Silverado (757kg) offer more, and even mainstream dual-cab utes, such as the Ford Ranger – 966kg (kerb weight)/1010kg (min kerb weight) – offer better payloads.

If you’re looking for a decent towing platform, it’s likely an F Series is already on your shopping list. This F-150’s maximum unbraked towing capacity is 750kg and 4500kg (braked), Gross Vehicle Mass is 3315kg and Gross Combined Mass is 7365kg.

This F-150 remains on par with rivals in the 4WD stakes.

The Ford F-150 has not been fully tested by ANCAP, but the safety watchdog did award it a Platinum collision avoidance score of 81 per cent in 2025. This rating applies only to Lariat and Platinum grades, not the XLT.

Standard safety gear includes six airbags, front and rear parking sensors, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist, traffic sign recognition, a surround-view camera, auto emergency braking (AEB), adaptive cruise control and trailer sway control.

There are top-tether child-seat attachment points in the rear seat but no ISOFIX points.

In safety terms, the F-150 has a stack of gear onboard which keeps it competitive against rivals.

Ford’s standard factory warranty for the Ranger is five years/unlimited kilometres.

There’s also the option of pre-paid servicing, available when you purchase the vehicle brand-new. By locking in the servicing cost, you can pay for the first four scheduled services up to 60,000km or four years, whichever comes first. That’s worked out in accordance with the vehicle’s 12 month/15,000km service intervals.

The Ford Australia website also has a service-cost calculator function where you can input your vehicle’s details and a fixed-price service cost will be worked out for you.

Ford Australia also has a huge dealer network, so parts and servicing should not represent a problem anywhere in the country.

The F-150 has a five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty and that’s pretty much standard for vehicles in the Aussie market.

Servicing is scheduled for every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs soonest and the F-150’s 12 months of free roadside assistance is extended when those schedules are followed.

Ford’s five-year pre-paid service package for this vehicle costs $1968, working at an average cost of $393.60 per service.

Ford Australia has about 180 dealerships.

In ownership terms, the F-150 remains competitive against its full-sized rivals.