Ford Ranger vs Chevrolet Silverado

What's the difference?

Our time with the new Ranger was limited in terms of distance driven and the number of variants we could sample. We were also unable to test the vehicle with a trailer attached, so we’re unsure as to how well the new, lower-powered engine will cope with towing duties.

We do know the new engine is being welcomed by owners and fleets who held concerns over the technical layout of the previous 2.0-litre powerplant, but only time will tell if the reduced performance is seen as being balanced by the technical upgrades.

We can also tell you there’s nothing inherently wrong with the new 2.0L in the context of normal driving on normal roads and its refinement is still an improvement on a lot of its competitors’ offerings.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

With its unique V8 soundtrack, all-terrain capabilities and sumptuous comfort, the ZR2 is a quintessential American muscle truck that's as capable of carting crews and accessing rugged worksites during the week as it is towing boats, horse-floats and caravans or getting muddy on weekends. For either work or play, there's a lot to like here.

Here’s a classic case of leaving well enough alone. Having figured out for sure that the Ranger’s looks weren’t costing it any sales whatsoever, Ford wisely decided to spend the facelift money where it counted most; under the bonnet.

If you have sharp eyes, you might pick the dark highlights replacing the chrome finish on some models, the new wheel designs and a couple of new hero colours for specific variants.

Beyond that, those big, bold, bluff looks continue with more than the odd nod to the US-market pick-ups that seem to inspire so many ute buyers in this country.

Inside it’s the same story, with those fabulous interior door handles that are so easy to use continuing and everything else remaining very, very Ranger-ish.

The Silverado’s extensive remanufacturing to RHD, performed on a purpose-built production line in Melbourne, meets OEM standards of fit and finish.

As the off-road focused 1500 model, the ZR2 has hardware and detailing consistent with its rugged bush-bashing persona, highlighted by aggressively treaded mud-terrain tyres and unique raised suspension with high performance dampers.

Other ZR2 features include a raised bonnet with ZR2 applique, ‘off-road cut’ front bumper, bash plates, black grille with ‘Flow Tie’ (flow-through) bow-tie motif, ‘Performance Red’ chassis-mounted front recovery hooks, concealed dual-outlet exhaust, black fender flares/door handles/bumpers/window surrounds and chrome ZR2 badges.

It has a tough and purposeful look with bluff-fronted styling and an imposing stance. 

An expansive length of almost 6.0 metres (5931mm) and a 14.4-metre turning circle highlight formidable (and at times impractical) dimensions for urban life.

The cabin is spacious and airy with a tasteful blend of contrasting tones and textures combined with many soft-touch surfaces, yellow stitching along seams and splashes of chrome and satin chrome creating a plush look and feel.

Despite the lower-tech new engine and its power losses compared with its predecessor, the 2.0-litre Ranger in dual-cab 4X4 form retains its full 3.5-tonne towing capacity.

Sticking with towing, if you option up the Touring Pack, the Ranger gets Ford’s 'Trailer Reversing Guidance' which uses cameras and the rotary drive-mode dial to allow the driver to take the hassle out of trailer reversing. Up to a point, anyway. But there’s also a great check-list menu on the info-screen to detect failed trailer lighting and other problems. The Touring Pack is now standard on many versions but still optional of cheaper variants.

Which ever version you buy, any dual-cab 4X4 Ranger styleside has a tub measuring 1547mm long, 1584 wide, 1224mm between the wheel arches (to accept a standard pallet) and a loading height of 816mm. The tub also features inner tie-down rails, a light, a tailgate-lift assist ram and cupholders moulded into the tailgate’s inner side.

Payloads for the various Ranger models are determined by kerb mass, which means the lightest variant, the XL can carry 1135kg, while the heaviest, the Platinum, is restricted to 981kg. Still a decent figure, to be honest.

Inside, the Ranger’s cabin ranges from the starkly utilitarian in the XL (vinyl floor mats and cloth seats to name just a couple of features) to extremely plush in the case of the Platinum with its four USB ports, wireless phone charging and even a row of six switch blanks ready for aftermarket accessories.

The front seating is definitely superior to the rear seat in the Ranger, and the latter features a fairly flat cushion and a backrest.

Lesser versions of the Ranger also get a conventional park-brake compared with the electronic one on more expensive models. We’ll take the manual version any day.

The ZR2’s hefty 2587kg kerb weight and 3300kg GVM results in a 713kg payload, which is modest given a seated crew of five big tradies could use up about two-thirds of that payload capacity before loading any of their gear.

It can also legally tow up to 3500kg of braked trailer on a 50mm ball and up to 4200kg on a 70mm ball. The latter figure is 300kg less than the LTZ due to the specialised off-road suspension.

However, given the ZR2’s 6851kg GCM rating (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time), you would be left with a mere 64kg of vehicle payload if you wanted to tow the maximum 4200kg.

That’s barely enough for a driver - and a light one at that. Fact is, few if any owners in real-world use would need to tow 4200kg, but it’s important to be across these legal limits if you’re planning to.

The load tub is protected internally by a spray-on liner and offers almost 1.8 cubic metres of load volume. Its load floor is 1776mm long, 1813mm wide and sits 569mm deep, with 1286mm between the rear-wheel housings. More than wide enough for hauling Aussie or Euro pallets.

There are also 12 load-anchorage points, power assistance for lowering the tailgate and a tub camera to keep an eye on loads when driving. The rear bumper provides surefooted tub access using either the centre step or concave side-steps.

All occupants enjoy luxurious space, particularly rear passengers thanks to easy entry created by the wide-opening doors, a flat floor with no transmission hump for the centre passenger to straddle and palatial head and legroom even for tall people. Combined with ample shoulder room, a full crew can travel in enviable comfort.

Cabin storage for the driver and front passenger includes two bottle holders and a bin in each door. There’s also a large glove box and the centre console has an open tray and two USB ports up front, two bottle holders in the centre and a big box at the back topped by a padded lid that provides comfy elbow support.

Rear passengers get a bottle holder and bin in each door, plus more USB ports and two more pairs of bottle holders in the rear of the centre console and in the bench seat’s fold-down centre armrest.

There’s also storage pockets on both front seat backrests and handy compartments for small items are cleverly concealed within the rear seat’s upper-backrest cushions. Its 60/40-split base cushions can also swing up and be stored vertically if more internal load space is required, or to access ample under-seat storage.

Our 1500 ZR2 test vehicle, like its LTZ Premium sibling, comes standard with GM’s thumping 6.2-litre petrol V8 paired with a 10-speed automatic and multi-mode 4WD transmission for a list price of $144,900.

Our example is also fitted with several items from the GMSV genuine accessory range including the tri-fold tonneau cover, side rocker protectors (aka rock rails) and matching removable side-steps. It’s also finished in 'Riptide Blue Metallic', which like the accessories is available at extra cost.

The ZR2’s standard equipment includes 18-inch gloss black alloy wheels with chunky 275/75 R18 Goodyear Wrangler Mud-Terrain tyres and a full-size alloy spare, LED headlights/DRLs/tail-lights, load tub camera, spray-on tub-liner with ZR2 logo, power tailgate, 4500kg towing kit including towbar, 12-pin harness and electric trailer-brake controller, 360-degree camera with up to 14 views and lots more (see Design).

Climb aboard the sumptuous interior with its keyless opening/start and you’re treated to a heated leather-wrapped steering wheel with power tilt/reach adjustment and multiple remote controls, leather-appointed and heated/cooled driver and front passenger seats with 10-way power adjustment and memory settings, heated rear seats, power sliding rear window, dual-zone climate control, front and rear USB ports and lots more.

The high-feature dash includes a colour 12.3-inch configurable driver’s instrument display and 13.4-inch multimedia touchscreen that controls, among other things, the Bose premium sound and wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto connectivity. The driver also has a choice of adaptive and non-adaptive cruise control plus there's a head-up display, switchable rear-view mirror camera function, tyre pressure monitoring and lots more, including the recent addition of standard front parking sensors on the ZR2.

Owners who need to tow will appreciate the reversing camera with hitch guidance and view, in-vehicle trailering app with different trailer profiles, trailer theft alert, automated trailer lighting test and a GCM alert.

While the V6 turbo-diesel remains unchanged with its 184kW and mighty 600Nm of torque. It remains paired with the 10-speed automatic transmission and the availability of a '4-Auto' setting for the drive system which allows for the use of all-wheel drive on dry bitumen.

The big change to the V6’s status is that it’s now available across the entire dual-cab 4X4 range, right down to the XL version with its rubber floor mats and steel wheels.

Now, if you were cynical, you might suggest Ford has made the V6 more widely available, because the four-cylinder engine option (once the only one available on lesser versions like the XL) has lost a bit of mojo in the transition to Ranger 2026.5.

The thought of a carmaker going backwards on specification and output for an engine goes against the grain somewhat, but in this case, the move to a simpler, potentially more robust engine design makes some sense in the context of long-term ownership costs.

Opinions are divided on how many of the previous 2.0-litre engines posed problems for their buyers, but the fact remains that the wet timing belt (where the rubber belt runs in an oil bath) design had a less-than-perfect track record here and abroad. And even if failures were only a small percentage of units sold, when that failure happens to you, it’s a 100 per cent failure rate…

So, Ford has re-engineered the 2.0-litre unit to use an utterly conventional timing chain, designed new pistons, a different fuel-injection system and reduced the turbocharger count from two to one. The theory is the more robust timing chain will reduce problems, while the single-turbo installation will save money at a production level. In the process, however, both power and torque outputs have fallen. In this case, the bi-turbo engine’s 154kW and 500Nm have fallen to 125kW and 405Nm respectively in the new engine.

Payloads and towing capacity have not been affected (the Ranger can still tow 3500kg) but there’s speculation that 125kW won’t drag a huge trailer around with the same ease as the old engine, even with the 10-speed automatic that’s fitted. Hence the V6 being made available across the board. Allegedly.

The counterpoint is that Ford has dropped the final-dive ratio of the 2.0-litre Rangers which should help with in-gear flexibility and acceleration.

The 2.0-litre-engined Rangers also lack the 4-Auto setting and operate in two-wheel drive mode exclusively on bitumen.

Like the LTZ, the ZR2 is powered by a 6.2-litre petrol V8 producing 313kW of power at 5600rpm and 624Nm of torque at 4100rpm. It features cylinder deactivation to optimise fuel economy when full power isn't required.

This is paired with a refined 10-speed torque converter automatic, armed with an auxiliary external oil cooler ideal for heavy towing duties and off-road slogging. It also offers sequential manual shifting using steering wheel-mounted paddles and there are numerous selectable drive modes.

Its dual-range transfer case with push-button control offers the choice of '2WD High', '4WD High', '4WD Low' and '4WD Auto', with the latter being a full-time torque-on-demand system. It’s also equipped with driver-selectable front and rear locking differentials for optimum traction in the rough stuff.

Ford claims a combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel economy figure of 6.8 litres per 100km for the new 2.0-litre engine. We didn’t get too close to that, but that’s hardly surprising given real-world figures almost never match the official test figure. Rather, we managed 8.2L/100km in mainly relaxed country driving and about 9.5L/100km with a little peak hour traffic thrown into the mix. Either way, the Ranger should be pretty frugal.

The real question mark crops up when you hook a bobcat and tandem trailer to the tow-bar. We’ll have to wait and see how that affects economy on the 'little' Ranger engine.

Meantime, those real-world figures, combined with the Ford’s 80-litre fuel tank, mean a typical range of something like 800 to 900km between visits to the service-station.

And while you might be thinking a newly-developed, modern turbo-diesel would need AdBlue, the 2.0-litre as fitted to the Ranger line-up does not.

GMSV claims official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption of 12.7L/100km and the dash display was showing 15.3 when we stopped to refuel at the completion of our 397km test, which included our usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about half was hauling a variety of payloads.

This compares to our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, which was higher again at 16.8L/100km. That exceeds the usual 2.0-3.0L/100km discrepancy between official and real-world consumption but is still acceptable for a 2.5-tonne pick-up powered by a big petrol V8 in urban use.

So, based on our real-world consumption figure, you could expect a driving range of around 540km from its relatively small 91-litre tank.

Since Ford has made no changes to suspension, steering, tyre specifications or braking hardware, it’s no surprise to find that the new version feels very familiar.

The V6 variants remain something of a revelation after some of the competitors’ four-cylinder engines, and the sophistication and refinement comes through immediately with the V6 slurring away at its upshifts and generally feeling like a high-end solution to a dual-cab propulsion problem.

But of course, we knew that, didn’t we? Exactly, so the big questions surround the new 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel with its new specification and downgraded outputs. Specifically, can 125kW and 405Nm cut it in this cut-throat market?

The initial answer appears to be yes. In fact, when you consider that not every dual-cab owner tows three-and-a-half tonnes with one, you can see why a smaller, more frugal engine might do the job. And there’s always the optional V6 if the job demands it, right?

Acceleration is nothing like the V6’s of course, but the new four-cylinder rolls along at highway speeds without a problem and can still accelerate to overtake. That’s largely a function of having 10 gears and a lower final-drive ratio, but the latter doesn’t seem to have made the engine feel manic or short-geared in any way.

Normal overtaking ranges, say, 70km/h to 100km/h feature lots of mid-range and it’s only when you wring the new engine out that it starts to feel a little puny at the top end. But it never fails to impress with its refined feel and fairly low noise levels and, if nothing else, it proves that smaller capacity four-cylinder engines have an inherent advantage in being smoother and silkier to rev than some of the big bangers out there.

Perhaps if you jumped straight from the outgoing bi-turbo variant into the new single-turbo Ranger, you might notice a decent fall-off in performance, but if you’d never driven a bi-turbo, you’ll never dismiss the new engine as anything other than completely adequate.

The caveat to all that is when we get to hitch a big load to the new Ranger and see what a couple or three tonnes does to that apparent adequacy.

The ZR2’s raised off-road suspension requires more of a climb aboard than the LTZ, but the low-slung removable side-steps fitted to our test vehicle certainly make boarding easier and are an accessory worth considering if most of your driving is on-road.

There are large handles on the truck’s A- and B-pillars to assist entry to the cabin where the driver is treated to multiple power adjustments of seat and steering wheel plus a large left footrest, which together provide a very comfortable driving position.

The ride and handling are outstanding, as the ZR2’s suspension combined with the additional cushioning of its baggy all-terrain tyres is commendably supple over bumps, yet it's surprisingly responsive to steering input without the ponderous feeling expected in a vehicle of this size and weight.

This response is optimised when the ‘Sport’ mode is selected as it sharpens steering, brake pedal feel and suspension tuning for a more engaging drive. It also activates the louder and freer-flowing exhaust setting and modifies the auto’s shift calibration, which allows the V8 to shine with a guttural roar under full throttle that is not only an aural delight but can quickly reach triple-digit speeds with remarkable ease.

By contrast, it can also deliver relaxed and fuel-efficient highway travel thanks to the V8’s auto cylinder deactivation and less than 1500rpm being required to maintain a leisurely 110km/h. Engine, tyre and wind noise are negligible at these speeds.

To test its payload rating we forklifted 475kg into the load tub which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload of 655kg that was within 60kg of its legal limit.

The rear leaf-springs only compressed abut 35mm under this loading, which left more than enough bump-stop clearance to ensure there was no bottoming out on our test route. The ZR2 performed so effortlessly with this payload it was easy to forget we even had one.

Our only criticism of the driving experience was the tri-fold tonneau cover. When hauling loads, this accessory is designed to fold forward into a flat bundle that leans against the rear of the cabin with two adjustable struts to brace it in place (see photo).

This worked fine during suburban driving up to 80km/h but was not suited to higher speeds, as the increased air pressure made it flex enough to block the rear-view mirror's camera view. So, an alternative tonneau design would be preferable for those needing to do lots of highway travel with uncovered loads.

There are currently no ANCAP star ratings for full-size US pick-ups. However, Australia’s vehicle safety authority has acknowledged the growing popularity of these vehicles with its inaugural ‘Large Utilities ADAS Safety Comparison’ to provide local consumers with comparisons of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (aka crash-avoidance technologies).

The Silverado 1500 range (February 2025-build onwards) earned the minimum bronze grading, with its score of 27 per cent being the lowest of all vehicles tested. By comparison, Ford’s F-150 earned the highest score with 81 per cent and premium platinum status.

Even so, the ZR2 has an extensive active safety menu including forward collision alert with low-speed AEB, lane-keeping, blind-spot monitoring (which expands to include trailers), rear cross-traffic alert, front/rear parking sensors, plus a 360-degree camera view (with up to 14 views) and more.

It also has six airbags including side-curtain protection for all outboard seating positions, plus ISOFIX child-seat anchorages on the two outer rear seating positions and three top-tethers.

Ford’s standard factory warranty for the Ranger is five years/unlimited kilometres.

There’s also the option of pre-paid servicing, available when you purchase the vehicle brand-new. By locking in the servicing cost, you can pay for the first four scheduled services up to 60,000km or four years, whichever comes first. That’s worked out in accordance with the vehicle’s 12 month/15,000km service intervals.

The Ford Australia website also has a service-cost calculator function where you can input your vehicle’s details and a fixed-price service cost will be worked out for you.

Ford Australia also has a huge dealer network, so parts and servicing should not represent a problem anywhere in the country.

Now comes standard with a class benchmark five years/unlimited km manufacturer warranty, plus five years of roadside assist.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/12,000km whichever occurs first, but there's no capped-price servicing. Expect a three year service bill of around $2000, which isn't outrageous for a vehicle of this type.

GMSV has an Australian network of 50-plus dealers across most states and territories and all dealerships can provide vehicle servicing.