What's the difference?
Ford has given its Ranger ute range a mild facelift. And mild is the word. If you look closely, you might notice some small visual changes, but the real news is under the bonnet where a new entry-level powerplant lives.
And however you look at it, this new engine that addresses the ownership issues experienced by some Ranger buyers since the bi-turbo diesel engine was released back in 2018, was probably overdue.
But the new powerplant comes at a cost; in terms of power and torque, even though the vital towing statistics remain for the Ranger.
The other changes that come with this facelift include some new tech, and the availability of the V6 turbo-diesel (which is unchanged) across the entire Ranger 4X4 dual-cab line-up.
For this review, we’ve concentrated on the new engine as being the major point of difference, and we’ve driven it the base-version XL trim specification. That means this is potentially the lightest variant, and heavier specifications might blunt the performance a little. But overall, this is representative of the new powertrain and represents the biggest point of difference in what is otherwise a very minor facelift.
The plug-in hybrid market is slowly but surely gaining traction in Australia, and Kia has thrown its hat into the ring with the flagship Sorento GT-Line PHEV AWD.
This top-spec seven-seat large SUV pairs family friendly practicality with the promise of lower emissions and petrol savings, at least, in theory.
So, is it the right blend of convenience, space and efficiency for busy families looking to dip a toe into electrification? That’s exactly what my family and I have been finding out.
Our time with the new Ranger was limited in terms of distance driven and the number of variants we could sample. We were also unable to test the vehicle with a trailer attached, so we’re unsure as to how well the new, lower-powered engine will cope with towing duties.
We do know the new engine is being welcomed by owners and fleets who held concerns over the technical layout of the previous 2.0-litre powerplant, but only time will tell if the reduced performance is seen as being balanced by the technical upgrades.
We can also tell you there’s nothing inherently wrong with the new 2.0L in the context of normal driving on normal roads and its refinement is still an improvement on a lot of its competitors’ offerings.
Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.
The Kia Sorento GT-Line PHEV is a sumptuously equipped seven-seater that delivers comfort, tech and an easy-going drive. It presents well on the surface, and for the right buyer (one who can make the most of its plug-in capabilities ) it could be a smart, low-emissions option for family life.
But for all its polish, it doesn’t quite do enough to justify itself as the best Sorento in the range. The electric-only driving range isn’t especially generous, and the higher price tag , combined with its lower towing capacity, may leave some families wondering whether the diesel variant is the more practical choice.
It’s not a bad car by any means, but the flagship GT-Line PHEV feels more like a stepping stone than a standout.
Here’s a classic case of leaving well enough alone. Having figured out for sure that the Ranger’s looks weren’t costing it any sales whatsoever, Ford wisely decided to spend the facelift money where it counted most; under the bonnet.
If you have sharp eyes, you might pick the dark highlights replacing the chrome finish on some models, the new wheel designs and a couple of new hero colours for specific variants.
Beyond that, those big, bold, bluff looks continue with more than the odd nod to the US-market pick-ups that seem to inspire so many ute buyers in this country.
Inside it’s the same story, with those fabulous interior door handles that are so easy to use continuing and everything else remaining very, very Ranger-ish.
The Sorento looks exactly how a modern SUV should - confident, capable, and well-proportioned without feeling bulky. It wears its size well, delivering that commanding presence families often want in a seven-seater, without coming across as too aggressive.
I especially like the 19-inch alloy wheels as they suit the vehicle’s stance perfectly. I also like the striking LED lighting signatures front and rear, which really come to life after dark.
Step inside and the cabin strikes a neat balance between tech-forward and user-friendly. You’re greeted by dual 12.3-inch widescreen displays that make a strong first impression, but thankfully Kia hasn’t gone all-digital! You still get physical buttons and dials where they matter, making everything feel intuitive and easy to navigate.
Material quality is a highlight. There’s quilted Nappa leather upholstery, soft-touch surfaces throughout, and even a luxe suede headliner. These premium touches, coupled with the panoramic sunroof, lift the ambience and it's a cabin that feels genuinely upmarket, but not at the cost of family friendly functionality.
Despite the lower-tech new engine and its power losses compared with its predecessor, the 2.0-litre Ranger in dual-cab 4X4 form retains its full 3.5-tonne towing capacity.
Sticking with towing, if you option up the Touring Pack, the Ranger gets Ford’s 'Trailer Reversing Guidance' which uses cameras and the rotary drive-mode dial to allow the driver to take the hassle out of trailer reversing. Up to a point, anyway. But there’s also a great check-list menu on the info-screen to detect failed trailer lighting and other problems. The Touring Pack is now standard on many versions but still optional of cheaper variants.
Which ever version you buy, any dual-cab 4X4 Ranger styleside has a tub measuring 1547mm long, 1584 wide, 1224mm between the wheel arches (to accept a standard pallet) and a loading height of 816mm. The tub also features inner tie-down rails, a light, a tailgate-lift assist ram and cupholders moulded into the tailgate’s inner side.
Payloads for the various Ranger models are determined by kerb mass, which means the lightest variant, the XL can carry 1135kg, while the heaviest, the Platinum, is restricted to 981kg. Still a decent figure, to be honest.
Inside, the Ranger’s cabin ranges from the starkly utilitarian in the XL (vinyl floor mats and cloth seats to name just a couple of features) to extremely plush in the case of the Platinum with its four USB ports, wireless phone charging and even a row of six switch blanks ready for aftermarket accessories.
The front seating is definitely superior to the rear seat in the Ranger, and the latter features a fairly flat cushion and a backrest.
Lesser versions of the Ranger also get a conventional park-brake compared with the electronic one on more expensive models. We’ll take the manual version any day.
Space up front is generous, with excellent seat comfort thanks to wide seat bases, extendable under-thigh support and heating and ventilation. Getting in and out is easy, too, helped by wide door openings and a manageable 176mm ground clearance.
Storage throughout the cabin is thoughtful and abundant. Up front, there’s a large glovebox, a spacious centre console with a removable shelf, two cupholders, door bins with bottle holders, and a handy phone cubby beneath the dash.
The second row adds its own bottle holders and storage bins in each door, map pockets, four cupholders (including one cleverly placed on each door) and a removable floor shelf in front of the centre seat.
Even the third row isn’t forgotten, with a snack cubby and cupholder built into each wheel arch.
Tech-wise, the dual 12.3-inch displays look sharp, and the media system is intuitive and quick to respond. The instrument cluster isn’t particularly customisable, and I’m not a huge fan of the layout, but it displays the essentials clearly. You also get a head-up display, satellite navigation with over-the-air updates, and both wireless and wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
Charging options are solid across all three rows, with multiple USB-C ports, a 12-volt socket in the second row and boot, and a wireless charging pad up front.
The second row offers ample legroom, though headroom is slightly reduced due to the panoramic sunroof. The lack of a transmission tunnel is a win for middle seat comfort, and the bench is wide enough to accommodate three child seats side-by-side. There are three top-tether points and ISOFIX anchors on the outboard seats.
Comfort and convenience features in the second row include heated outboard seats, device pockets, directional air vents, and the same handy storage and charging options mentioned earlier. My son especially loves the retractable sunblinds and the cupholders built into the door handles as they’re easy to reach and super practical. I am, however, disappointed that there’s no separate climate control zone for this row.
As for the third row, it’s best treated as a sometimes seat for adults. Access is more child-sized, and amenities are limited, but you do get directional air vents and a fan control, which are definitely appreciated.
Boot space is tight with all three rows in use, at just 175L, but that was still enough for the odd errand during the week. Fold the third row down and you get a much more usable 604L. Both rows fold completely flat, making it easy to slide in larger items, and the GT-Line includes a powered tailgate and a rare full-size spare wheel for extra convenience.
The Ranger line-up is vast, so we’ve stuck with the dual-cab 4X4 versions in the range for the purposes of this review, mainly because that’s what people are buying in the greatest numbers.
The line-up kicks off with the XL dual-cab at $51,400 in 2.0-litre form ($57,990 for the V6 version), before working through the Black Edition 2.0-litre at $53,000 drive-away ($60,000), XLT at $67,990, the Wolftrak at $73,000 drive-away, Tremor at $75,090, Wildtrak at an identical $75,090 and finally the Ranger Platinum at $80,890. We’ve left the Raptor and Super Duty variants out of this as they’re completely separate vehicles despite sharing basic architecture.
Within that line-up, of course, there are some new models making a debut, some old ones disappearing and other familiar names making a return. The variant saying goodbye is the Sport, which is being replaced by the Wolftrak with a slightly more off-road focus. It includes the 'Touring Pack' that features the 360-degree camera.
The Tremor which was a special edition, has now joined the fleet permanently, and it gets all-terrain tyres and a 26mm lift to its ride height. The Tremor is now also available for a limited time with the V6 engine.
The main changes to the across-the-board specification include the 12-inch screen, a 400-watt inverter and dual-zone climate-control. Other notable additions include matrix LED headlights and a Bang & Olufsen stereo system for the Wildtrak variant.
Across the fleet, all versions that come standard with the 2.0 litre turbo-diesel can be optioned with the V6 turbo-diesel, and the Ranger now also has a standard 12 inch info-screen, a trailer alarm and front and rear parking sensors.
There are five grades in the Sorento line-up, and this week we're behind the wheel of the flagship GT-Line PHEV AWD. This is the most expensive Sorento you can buy, with a price tag of $84,660 before on-road costs — about $15,000 more than the equivalent petrol or diesel GT-Line variants.
That’s a hefty premium, but when you stack it up against other plug-in hybrid rivals, like the (albeit-premium) Volvo XC90 Ultra Recharge which starts at $124,466 or the BMW X5 xDrive50e with its $125,885 MSRP price tag, the Sorento PHEV starts to look like a more affordable entry point to electrified family motoring.
As the range-topper, the GT-Line doesn’t skimp on equipment. You get all the luxury touches like, heated and ventilated power front seats with memory functionality, heated rear outboard seats, a heated steering wheel, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a panoramic sunroof, six USB-C ports and two 12-volt sockets, and a 12-speaker premium Bose sound system.
It also features quilted Nappa leather upholstery, customisable ambient lighting, dual 12.3-inch displays for multimedia and instrumentation, digital radio, Bluetooth connectivity and Kia’s clever Passenger Talk function, which lets the driver’s voice reach the third row through the speakers (a feature many parents will quietly cheer for).
There’s no shortage of thoughtful family focused features either, including rear window shades for the second row, a powered tailgate (operable via the driver’s seat or key fob), remote smart parking assist, one-touch sliding second-row seats, a third row that folds flat, and dedicated fan control in the rear.
The biggest question, though, is whether all of this plus the new plug-in hybrid powertrain is enough to justify the price jump.
While the V6 turbo-diesel remains unchanged with its 184kW and mighty 600Nm of torque. It remains paired with the 10-speed automatic transmission and the availability of a '4-Auto' setting for the drive system which allows for the use of all-wheel drive on dry bitumen.
The big change to the V6’s status is that it’s now available across the entire dual-cab 4X4 range, right down to the XL version with its rubber floor mats and steel wheels.
Now, if you were cynical, you might suggest Ford has made the V6 more widely available, because the four-cylinder engine option (once the only one available on lesser versions like the XL) has lost a bit of mojo in the transition to Ranger 2026.5.
The thought of a carmaker going backwards on specification and output for an engine goes against the grain somewhat, but in this case, the move to a simpler, potentially more robust engine design makes some sense in the context of long-term ownership costs.
Opinions are divided on how many of the previous 2.0-litre engines posed problems for their buyers, but the fact remains that the wet timing belt (where the rubber belt runs in an oil bath) design had a less-than-perfect track record here and abroad. And even if failures were only a small percentage of units sold, when that failure happens to you, it’s a 100 per cent failure rate…
So, Ford has re-engineered the 2.0-litre unit to use an utterly conventional timing chain, designed new pistons, a different fuel-injection system and reduced the turbocharger count from two to one. The theory is the more robust timing chain will reduce problems, while the single-turbo installation will save money at a production level. In the process, however, both power and torque outputs have fallen. In this case, the bi-turbo engine’s 154kW and 500Nm have fallen to 125kW and 405Nm respectively in the new engine.
Payloads and towing capacity have not been affected (the Ranger can still tow 3500kg) but there’s speculation that 125kW won’t drag a huge trailer around with the same ease as the old engine, even with the 10-speed automatic that’s fitted. Hence the V6 being made available across the board. Allegedly.
The counterpoint is that Ford has dropped the final-dive ratio of the 2.0-litre Rangers which should help with in-gear flexibility and acceleration.
The 2.0-litre-engined Rangers also lack the 4-Auto setting and operate in two-wheel drive mode exclusively on bitumen.
Powering this GT-Line variant is a plug-in hybrid system that pairs a 1.6-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine with a small electric motor and battery. Combined, the system delivers up to 195kW of power and 350Nm of torque, which is plenty to get this sizeable SUV moving with confidence.
It’s a part-time all-wheel-drive set-up with a lock mode for extra traction when needed, and it’s paired with a smooth-shifting six-speed automatic transmission.
Around town and on the highway, the power delivery feels seamless and refined, with the electric motor doing a nice job of smoothing out stop-start driving.
One key trade-off, however, is towing capacity. While the diesel Sorento can tow up to 2000kg braked, the PHEV’s figure drops to just 1010kg. That’s a significant reduction and could be a deal-breaker for families who regularly tow a camper, trailer or boat.
Ford claims a combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel economy figure of 6.8 litres per 100km for the new 2.0-litre engine. We didn’t get too close to that, but that’s hardly surprising given real-world figures almost never match the official test figure. Rather, we managed 8.2L/100km in mainly relaxed country driving and about 9.5L/100km with a little peak hour traffic thrown into the mix. Either way, the Ranger should be pretty frugal.
The real question mark crops up when you hook a bobcat and tandem trailer to the tow-bar. We’ll have to wait and see how that affects economy on the 'little' Ranger engine.
Meantime, those real-world figures, combined with the Ford’s 80-litre fuel tank, mean a typical range of something like 800 to 900km between visits to the service-station.
And while you might be thinking a newly-developed, modern turbo-diesel would need AdBlue, the 2.0-litre as fitted to the Ranger line-up does not.
The Sorento GT-Line PHEV offers a WLTP-rated electric-only driving range of up to 57km - not huge, but enough to cover most daily commutes or school runs without dipping into the petrol tank.
When driven as intended and regularly charged, it’s capable of a combined fuel consumption figure as low as 1.6L/100km and this is paired with a 67-litre fuel tank. That means you could go a seriously long time between fill-ups if you’re topping up the battery daily.
In my week of testing, which included a mix of highway stints and urban errands, the trip computer reported an average of 7.2L/100km.
That’s well above the official figure, but still pretty reasonable considering the type of driving I was doing.
Charging is simple enough. The Sorento uses a Type 2 charging port, and on a standard 3.3kW AC charger, the 14kWh battery can be charged from 15 to 95 per cent in about three hours and 26 minutes.
Kia includes a portable AC charger with this grade, which is a handy bonus for charging at home or on the go.
Since Ford has made no changes to suspension, steering, tyre specifications or braking hardware, it’s no surprise to find that the new version feels very familiar.
The V6 variants remain something of a revelation after some of the competitors’ four-cylinder engines, and the sophistication and refinement comes through immediately with the V6 slurring away at its upshifts and generally feeling like a high-end solution to a dual-cab propulsion problem.
But of course, we knew that, didn’t we? Exactly, so the big questions surround the new 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel with its new specification and downgraded outputs. Specifically, can 125kW and 405Nm cut it in this cut-throat market?
The initial answer appears to be yes. In fact, when you consider that not every dual-cab owner tows three-and-a-half tonnes with one, you can see why a smaller, more frugal engine might do the job. And there’s always the optional V6 if the job demands it, right?
Acceleration is nothing like the V6’s of course, but the new four-cylinder rolls along at highway speeds without a problem and can still accelerate to overtake. That’s largely a function of having 10 gears and a lower final-drive ratio, but the latter doesn’t seem to have made the engine feel manic or short-geared in any way.
Normal overtaking ranges, say, 70km/h to 100km/h feature lots of mid-range and it’s only when you wring the new engine out that it starts to feel a little puny at the top end. But it never fails to impress with its refined feel and fairly low noise levels and, if nothing else, it proves that smaller capacity four-cylinder engines have an inherent advantage in being smoother and silkier to rev than some of the big bangers out there.
Perhaps if you jumped straight from the outgoing bi-turbo variant into the new single-turbo Ranger, you might notice a decent fall-off in performance, but if you’d never driven a bi-turbo, you’ll never dismiss the new engine as anything other than completely adequate.
The caveat to all that is when we get to hitch a big load to the new Ranger and see what a couple or three tonnes does to that apparent adequacy.
The Sorento PHEV hits most of the right notes when it comes to power delivery and gear shifts. Occasionally, there's a slight hesitation between whether the engine or electric motor should take the lead - like a dance partner who’s just a touch out of step. It’s noticeable, but not disruptive.
Most of the time, the transition between power sources is smooth, and there’s more than enough grunt for overtaking or merging confidently.
The suspension has a springy, soft edge to it and you’ll feel some movement over bumps but it’s never harsh or uncomfortable. It corners surprisingly well for a large SUV, with responsive, albeit lighter, steering. Body roll is present if you push into tight bends, but that's par for the course in a seven-seater.
Regenerative braking is subtle, almost too subtle. There’s not much feedback, and it can feel a bit heavy underfoot in stop-start traffic. It’s not a deal-breaker, but worth noting if you’re expecting the more pronounced regen feel you get in some other hybrids or EVs.
The cabin remains quiet at both urban and highway speeds, making it easy to hold a conversation across all three rows. Visibility is generally good, though the thicker pillars take a little getting used to. The digital rearview mirror is a great touch when the back seats are loaded with people or gear.
Parking is refreshingly simple thanks to a crisp 360-degree camera and front and rear sensors. One of my favourite features is the remote smart parking, which lets you move the car forwards or backwards via the keyfob, a lifesaver in tight parking spots. Just don’t teach your eight-year-old how to use it ...
The Ranger’s safety systems are among the better ones in the dual-cab market, in terms of their number and depth, but also their calibration and transparency.
All Rangers now have front and rear parking sensors and an alarm system that alerts the driver if the Ranger’s trailer is disconnected. There are also driver aids including adaptive cruise-control, traffic sign recognition, blind-spot monitoring, autonomous emergency braking, trailer-sway control, lane keeping assistance and pre-collision warning.
There are nine airbags including full-length side-curtain airbags for both rows of seats.
A little disappointingly for such a towing-biased vehicle, tyre pressure monitoring isn’t available until you get to the XLT trim level. It should be standard across the range on a vehicle like this.
The Ranger was locally crash tested by ANCAP back in 2022 where all dual-cab variants scored the maximum five stars.
The Sorento PHEV shares its five-star ANCAP safety rating with the rest of the Sorento range, based on testing conducted in 2020. It comes with seven airbags, although it’s worth noting that the curtain airbags don’t extend to the third row, which is a disappointing oversight in a family focused seven-seater.
That said, the GT-Line PHEV still brings a solid suite of safety tech. A standout is the blind-spot view monitor, which displays a live video feed of your blind spots in the instrument panel whenever you indicate and it’s one of those features you quickly grow to rely on! There’s also emergency call functionality, a digital rear-view mirror, and safe exit assist to help avoid incidents with passing traffic when opening doors.
A welcome update is those notorious Kia speed limit beeps and alerts can now be easily silenced via the steering wheel. It’s a small thing, but it makes a big difference to the overall driving experience.
Standard safety features include blind-spot monitoring, rear occupant alert, forward collision warning, rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keeping assist and lane departure warning, driver attention alert, intelligent seatbelt reminders (six seats), front and rear fog lights, and LED daytime running lights.
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) is also standard, with vehicle detection from 5.0 - 75km/h, and pedestrian, cyclist and reverse AEB support from 5.0 - 85km/h.
For child seat installation, there are three top-tether anchor points and two ISOFIX mounts in the second row. That’s enough flexibility for most families, though it would be nice to see more child-restraint coverage further back.
Ford’s standard factory warranty for the Ranger is five years/unlimited kilometres.
There’s also the option of pre-paid servicing, available when you purchase the vehicle brand-new. By locking in the servicing cost, you can pay for the first four scheduled services up to 60,000km or four years, whichever comes first. That’s worked out in accordance with the vehicle’s 12 month/15,000km service intervals.
The Ford Australia website also has a service-cost calculator function where you can input your vehicle’s details and a fixed-price service cost will be worked out for you.
Ford Australia also has a huge dealer network, so parts and servicing should not represent a problem anywhere in the country.
The Sorento is backed by Kia’s seven-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty, which keeps the Sorento competitive in a market that is slowly starting to offer seven/year plus terms as standard.
You’ll also benefit from capped-price servicing for up to seven years or 70,000km, with an average cost of $764 per visit. That’s on the pricier side, especially when compared to some rivals.
Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, whichever comes first, so if you’re someone who racks up the kilometres quickly, that could mean more frequent trips to the service centre than you’d like.
It’s also worth noting that the GT-Line PHEV requires a minimum of 95 RON premium unleaded petrol, which is something to factor into your ongoing running costs, particularly if you're already trying to offset fuel usage with regular charging.