Ford Ranger vs Peugeot 5008

What's the difference?

Our time with the new Ranger was limited in terms of distance driven and the number of variants we could sample. We were also unable to test the vehicle with a trailer attached, so we’re unsure as to how well the new, lower-powered engine will cope with towing duties.

We do know the new engine is being welcomed by owners and fleets who held concerns over the technical layout of the previous 2.0-litre powerplant, but only time will tell if the reduced performance is seen as being balanced by the technical upgrades.

We can also tell you there’s nothing inherently wrong with the new 2.0L in the context of normal driving on normal roads and its refinement is still an improvement on a lot of its competitors’ offerings.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

Despite its new mild-hybrid powertrain and generous list of premium features, the Peugeot 5008 GT Premium Hybrid doesn’t always hit the mark. It’s not a bad car. In fact, it’s comfortable, stylish, and well-equipped. But it sits in a highly competitive segment where some rivals offer more space, more power, or better value.

It’s not the most versatile seven-seater on the market, but it will suit families who only occasionally need that third row. And that’s the theme here. The 5008 is sufficient. It does most things well enough, but in a class full of standout options, it doesn’t quite push through to the front.

Here’s a classic case of leaving well enough alone. Having figured out for sure that the Ranger’s looks weren’t costing it any sales whatsoever, Ford wisely decided to spend the facelift money where it counted most; under the bonnet.

If you have sharp eyes, you might pick the dark highlights replacing the chrome finish on some models, the new wheel designs and a couple of new hero colours for specific variants.

Beyond that, those big, bold, bluff looks continue with more than the odd nod to the US-market pick-ups that seem to inspire so many ute buyers in this country.

Inside it’s the same story, with those fabulous interior door handles that are so easy to use continuing and everything else remaining very, very Ranger-ish.

The redesigned 5008 essentially looks like a stretched 3008, with a more squared-off rear that adds some robustness but not necessarily extra style.

It’s nice enough from most angles, but not all of them. The front, however, is a different story. With its fresh grille design and sharp pixel LED headlights, it looks striking, and the signature Peugeot ‘claw’ light motif remains; a detail fans will appreciate. The flagship grade also gets a stylised C-pillar and 19-inch alloy wheels to round out the look.

Inside is where the 5008 really shines. Trust the French to bring some dramatic flair, as the cabin is a standout. A multi-tiered dashboard and centre console are finished in a mix of grey knit fabric and Nappa leather, adding texture and elegance. Soft-touch materials are used generously, and with interesting lines and layered details, there’s always something to catch the eye.

The panoramic sunroof brightens things up during the day, while customisable ambient lighting adds wow-factor at night. That said, the pixel-style lighting strips can be a bit trippy if you stare at them too long!

Despite the lower-tech new engine and its power losses compared with its predecessor, the 2.0-litre Ranger in dual-cab 4X4 form retains its full 3.5-tonne towing capacity.

Sticking with towing, if you option up the Touring Pack, the Ranger gets Ford’s 'Trailer Reversing Guidance' which uses cameras and the rotary drive-mode dial to allow the driver to take the hassle out of trailer reversing. Up to a point, anyway. But there’s also a great check-list menu on the info-screen to detect failed trailer lighting and other problems. The Touring Pack is now standard on many versions but still optional of cheaper variants.

Which ever version you buy, any dual-cab 4X4 Ranger styleside has a tub measuring 1547mm long, 1584 wide, 1224mm between the wheel arches (to accept a standard pallet) and a loading height of 816mm. The tub also features inner tie-down rails, a light, a tailgate-lift assist ram and cupholders moulded into the tailgate’s inner side.

Payloads for the various Ranger models are determined by kerb mass, which means the lightest variant, the XL can carry 1135kg, while the heaviest, the Platinum, is restricted to 981kg. Still a decent figure, to be honest.

Inside, the Ranger’s cabin ranges from the starkly utilitarian in the XL (vinyl floor mats and cloth seats to name just a couple of features) to extremely plush in the case of the Platinum with its four USB ports, wireless phone charging and even a row of six switch blanks ready for aftermarket accessories.

The front seating is definitely superior to the rear seat in the Ranger, and the latter features a fairly flat cushion and a backrest.

Lesser versions of the Ranger also get a conventional park-brake compared with the electronic one on more expensive models. We’ll take the manual version any day.

When it comes to functionality and practicality, the new 5008 mostly hits the right beats. The beats it doesn't hit feel more quirky than full-fledged misses, though.

The first row is the clear winner for comfort, offering electric front seats with heating, ventilation, massage functions, expandable under-thigh support and adjustable lumbar and side bolsters.

That said, the passenger seat sits too high and is angled slightly forward in its base position, which made it tricky to find a comfortable setting for a long road trip.

The middle row features three individually folding seats, though they slide in a 60/40 split. At 4791mm long, the 5008 is on the larger side of the mid-size SUV segment, and that translates to decent legroom in the second row.

However, the seats are quite firm and set in a stadium-style layout. That raised position gives passengers a good view forward but means taller occupants will find themselves close to the roofline.

Amenities in the second row are solid, including climate control, manual sun-blinds, heated outboard seats and two USB-C ports. The only letdown is the fold-down centre armrest, which is frustratingly hard to open as it doesn’t have a toggle.

The third row is strictly kid territory. Access is manageable and the space is fine for children, but don’t expect adults to enjoy the ride. Even my eight-year old noted the limited amenities and legroom back there.

Access throughout the cabin is slightly awkward as the front footwells are flush with the door sills, but that changes towards the rear where the sill and floor levels shift, making it easy to tangle feet on entry until you get used to it. However, the 231mm ground clearance means it’s easy for oldies to get in and out.

Storage is well thought out, with a large ventilated centre console, glove box, centre console bin, phone cradle and sunglasses holder up front. The second row gets two netted map pockets and a small storage cubby under the rear of the centre console. There are cupholders in the first two rows and bottle holders in every door.

Boot space is decent for a seven-seater. With all three rows in place, you get 348L which is enough for a couple of school bags or a modest grocery run.

Fold the third row down and it expands to a useful 916L. There is an underfloor storage area but it disappears underneath the third row and the little space is hard to access if something rolls back there. A powered tailgate is standard on the GT Premium, though we found it didn’t open reliably from the external button.

Technology is fairly straightforward. The media display is responsive and includes sat nav, plus wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. However, the screen’s narrow, wide layout can make it easy to hit the wrong icon, and the lack of physical shortcut buttons means you’re relying heavily on the customisable on-screen panel. It didn’t bother me but my dad didn’t like it.

Charging options are good across the cabin, with USB-C ports in the first and second rows, a 12-volt socket and wireless charging pad up front and another 12-volt socket in the boot which third-row passengers can access in a pinch.

Don't bother looking for a spare of any description, a tyre repair kit is your only option.

The new 5008 line-up has been simplified to just two grades, the Allure and flagship GT Premium Hybrid, which we’re testing for this review. With a drive-away price of $73,705, it’s the most expensive top-spec, seven-seat mid-size SUV in its class.

For comparison, the Chery Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid Urban drives away at $49,990, the Mitsubishi Outlander Exceed Tourer at $63,130, and the Nissan X-Trail Ti-L e-Power at $59,990.

That higher price tag is softened somewhat by a generous list of premium features. You get Nappa leather upholstery, electric front seats (with heating, ventilation and massage functions), a panoramic sunroof, heated rear outboard seats, built-in sat nav and three-zone climate control.

New for this update is a 21-inch curved panoramic display that blends the digital instrument cluster with the central touchscreen.

You’ll also find pixel LED headlights, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, an AI voice assistant and over-the-air updates for the nav system.

Other standard features include keyless entry and start, a hands-free powered tailgate, four USB-C ports, two 12-volt sockets, a wireless charging pad, customisable ambient lighting, rear sun-blinds, a retractable cargo cover and a 360-degree camera system as well as front and rear parking sensors.

All up, the spec list justifies the GT Premium’s high-end position but make no mistake, you are paying for it.

While the V6 turbo-diesel remains unchanged with its 184kW and mighty 600Nm of torque. It remains paired with the 10-speed automatic transmission and the availability of a '4-Auto' setting for the drive system which allows for the use of all-wheel drive on dry bitumen.

The big change to the V6’s status is that it’s now available across the entire dual-cab 4X4 range, right down to the XL version with its rubber floor mats and steel wheels.

Now, if you were cynical, you might suggest Ford has made the V6 more widely available, because the four-cylinder engine option (once the only one available on lesser versions like the XL) has lost a bit of mojo in the transition to Ranger 2026.5.

The thought of a carmaker going backwards on specification and output for an engine goes against the grain somewhat, but in this case, the move to a simpler, potentially more robust engine design makes some sense in the context of long-term ownership costs.

Opinions are divided on how many of the previous 2.0-litre engines posed problems for their buyers, but the fact remains that the wet timing belt (where the rubber belt runs in an oil bath) design had a less-than-perfect track record here and abroad. And even if failures were only a small percentage of units sold, when that failure happens to you, it’s a 100 per cent failure rate…

So, Ford has re-engineered the 2.0-litre unit to use an utterly conventional timing chain, designed new pistons, a different fuel-injection system and reduced the turbocharger count from two to one. The theory is the more robust timing chain will reduce problems, while the single-turbo installation will save money at a production level. In the process, however, both power and torque outputs have fallen. In this case, the bi-turbo engine’s 154kW and 500Nm have fallen to 125kW and 405Nm respectively in the new engine.

Payloads and towing capacity have not been affected (the Ranger can still tow 3500kg) but there’s speculation that 125kW won’t drag a huge trailer around with the same ease as the old engine, even with the 10-speed automatic that’s fitted. Hence the V6 being made available across the board. Allegedly.

The counterpoint is that Ford has dropped the final-dive ratio of the 2.0-litre Rangers which should help with in-gear flexibility and acceleration.

The 2.0-litre-engined Rangers also lack the 4-Auto setting and operate in two-wheel drive mode exclusively on bitumen.

All grades of the 5008 now share the same mild-hybrid powertrain, paired with a six-speed dual-clutch auto transmission. The set-up combines a 1.2-litre, three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine with a small electric motor and a 48-volt battery.

Together, they produce 107kW and 230Nm, making it the least powerful offering compared to its rivals.

Performance is modest, with a claimed 0-100km/h time of 11.3 seconds, so you won’t be winning any races. While there's more to consider for everyday driving than outright speed it factors into long highway trips.

Ford claims a combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel economy figure of 6.8 litres per 100km for the new 2.0-litre engine. We didn’t get too close to that, but that’s hardly surprising given real-world figures almost never match the official test figure. Rather, we managed 8.2L/100km in mainly relaxed country driving and about 9.5L/100km with a little peak hour traffic thrown into the mix. Either way, the Ranger should be pretty frugal.

The real question mark crops up when you hook a bobcat and tandem trailer to the tow-bar. We’ll have to wait and see how that affects economy on the 'little' Ranger engine.

Meantime, those real-world figures, combined with the Ford’s 80-litre fuel tank, mean a typical range of something like 800 to 900km between visits to the service-station.

And while you might be thinking a newly-developed, modern turbo-diesel would need AdBlue, the 2.0-litre as fitted to the Ranger line-up does not.

The new hybrid powertrain has a claimed combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption figure of 5.1L/100km. With a 55-litre fuel tank that translates to a theoretical driving range of up to 1078km, which is impressive for a seven-seat SUV.

The regenerative braking offers mild feedback but obviously helps because in real-world conditions I averaged 6.1L/100km over a week of mixed urban and open-road driving. That’s not far off the official claim and still very respectable for a family hauler of this size.

Since Ford has made no changes to suspension, steering, tyre specifications or braking hardware, it’s no surprise to find that the new version feels very familiar.

The V6 variants remain something of a revelation after some of the competitors’ four-cylinder engines, and the sophistication and refinement comes through immediately with the V6 slurring away at its upshifts and generally feeling like a high-end solution to a dual-cab propulsion problem.

But of course, we knew that, didn’t we? Exactly, so the big questions surround the new 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel with its new specification and downgraded outputs. Specifically, can 125kW and 405Nm cut it in this cut-throat market?

The initial answer appears to be yes. In fact, when you consider that not every dual-cab owner tows three-and-a-half tonnes with one, you can see why a smaller, more frugal engine might do the job. And there’s always the optional V6 if the job demands it, right?

Acceleration is nothing like the V6’s of course, but the new four-cylinder rolls along at highway speeds without a problem and can still accelerate to overtake. That’s largely a function of having 10 gears and a lower final-drive ratio, but the latter doesn’t seem to have made the engine feel manic or short-geared in any way.

Normal overtaking ranges, say, 70km/h to 100km/h feature lots of mid-range and it’s only when you wring the new engine out that it starts to feel a little puny at the top end. But it never fails to impress with its refined feel and fairly low noise levels and, if nothing else, it proves that smaller capacity four-cylinder engines have an inherent advantage in being smoother and silkier to rev than some of the big bangers out there.

Perhaps if you jumped straight from the outgoing bi-turbo variant into the new single-turbo Ranger, you might notice a decent fall-off in performance, but if you’d never driven a bi-turbo, you’ll never dismiss the new engine as anything other than completely adequate.

The caveat to all that is when we get to hitch a big load to the new Ranger and see what a couple or three tonnes does to that apparent adequacy.

You quickly learn the 5008's limits. It has enough power to get up to speed without feeling strained but there’s not much left in reserve. Overtaking is doable but not fast. It’ll get the job done, just don’t expect a burst of responsiveness once you're already cruising.

Steering has a nice, reassuring weight to it and helps you feel in control. The lane-keeping aid can be a little over-eager and tends to jiggle you around, but otherwise the driver assists don’t get in the way.

The suspension is on the firmer side, so you feel bumps on the road. That said, I never winced going over them, which speaks to how well it handles everyday surfaces.

Visibility is a strong point from the driver’s seat. The B-pillar is a little chunky, but the elevated driving position gives you a clear view through the front and sides.

You can feel the transition between the hybrid components, but it’s not jarring. However, the regenerative braking isn’t very strong. A bit more bite could help the driving experience, especially around town.

Parking is refreshingly easy. The 360-degree camera system's screen is small but clear, and the 5008’s relatively compact footprint for a seven-seater makes it easier to slot into tight spots. It’s a plus if you’re regularly navigating city streets.

At the time of writing, the new Peugeot 5008 remains unrated by ANCAP, which may be a consideration for some family buyers. It also features just six airbags which is on the low side for a seven-seater but the side curtain airbags extend to the third row, which is important.

Crash avoidance tech is comprehensive and includes autonomous emergency braking, forward collision warning, blind-spot monitoring, lane departure warning, lane-keeping assist, driver attention alert, traffic sign recognition, a 360-degree camera system, front and rear parking sensors, rear cross-traffic alert, hill start assist, tyre pressure monitoring and intelligent seatbelt reminders for all seven seats.

In terms of child-seat accommodation, the second row offers two ISOFIX anchors and three top-tether anchor points.

The adaptive cruise control isn’t as well-calibrated as I’d like as it can feel a little slow to react and sometimes reacts to vehicles in side lanes. But otherwise, the safety tech works in the background without being overly intrusive.

Ford’s standard factory warranty for the Ranger is five years/unlimited kilometres.

There’s also the option of pre-paid servicing, available when you purchase the vehicle brand-new. By locking in the servicing cost, you can pay for the first four scheduled services up to 60,000km or four years, whichever comes first. That’s worked out in accordance with the vehicle’s 12 month/15,000km service intervals.

The Ford Australia website also has a service-cost calculator function where you can input your vehicle’s details and a fixed-price service cost will be worked out for you.

Ford Australia also has a huge dealer network, so parts and servicing should not represent a problem anywhere in the country.

The new 5008 is backed by Peugeot’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, with five years of complimentary roadside assistance included.

While that’s fairly standard, it doesn’t quite match the longer coverage offered by some rivals, with several now pushing out to seven years or more.

Servicing intervals are spaced at every 12 months or 20,000km, whichever comes first, which is generous compared to some competitors.

Peugeot also offers pre-paid service plans in three-, four-, or five-year packages. The five-year plan costs $1995, which is cheaper than paying as you go and reasonable for this class.