Ford Ranger vs Mercedes-Benz Sprinter

What's the difference?

Our time with the new Ranger was limited in terms of distance driven and the number of variants we could sample. We were also unable to test the vehicle with a trailer attached, so we’re unsure as to how well the new, lower-powered engine will cope with towing duties.

We do know the new engine is being welcomed by owners and fleets who held concerns over the technical layout of the previous 2.0-litre powerplant, but only time will tell if the reduced performance is seen as being balanced by the technical upgrades.

We can also tell you there’s nothing inherently wrong with the new 2.0L in the context of normal driving on normal roads and its refinement is still an improvement on a lot of its competitors’ offerings.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

Given the original Sprinter was released in 1995, it’s not surprising the current third-generation model feels like it’s benefitted greatly from decades of continuous refinement. Although the list price difference between our test vehicle and its closest Chinese rival is substantial, the 417 MWB Panel Van is hard to fault in terms of driver comfort, safety and all-round competence. It really is very good.

Here’s a classic case of leaving well enough alone. Having figured out for sure that the Ranger’s looks weren’t costing it any sales whatsoever, Ford wisely decided to spend the facelift money where it counted most; under the bonnet.

If you have sharp eyes, you might pick the dark highlights replacing the chrome finish on some models, the new wheel designs and a couple of new hero colours for specific variants.

Beyond that, those big, bold, bluff looks continue with more than the odd nod to the US-market pick-ups that seem to inspire so many ute buyers in this country.

Inside it’s the same story, with those fabulous interior door handles that are so easy to use continuing and everything else remaining very, very Ranger-ish.

The 417 MWB Panel Van rides on a 3665mm wheelbase (the shortest of three Sprinter wheelbases) and is almost 6.0 metres long (5932mm), more than 2.0 metres wide (2020mm) and stands almost 2.4 metres tall (2378mm). Its 12.4 metres kerb-to-kerb turning circle is impressively tight for a vehicle of this length.

It rides on simple and rugged MacPherson strut front suspension, with a robust live axle/leaf-spring arrangement under the tail. Steering is via rack and pinion and it has disc brakes all around.

Look beyond the optional silver metallic paint on our example and there’s extensive use of unpainted dark grey plastic on all the external surfaces where hard-working vans are most prone to wear and tear, including the hubcaps, front/rear bumpers, grille, door-handles/mirror shells and along the sides.

Its work-focused exterior styling is nicely integrated, combined with an equally neat and functional interior design that offers a visually-pleasing combination of patterned fabric seat-facings and hard surfaces that blend different shades of grey with splashes of satin chrome and piano black.

We also like the feel and response of mechanical switches (rather than touchscreen prompts) for adjusting settings like cabin temperature, fan speed and media volume.

Despite the lower-tech new engine and its power losses compared with its predecessor, the 2.0-litre Ranger in dual-cab 4X4 form retains its full 3.5-tonne towing capacity.

Sticking with towing, if you option up the Touring Pack, the Ranger gets Ford’s 'Trailer Reversing Guidance' which uses cameras and the rotary drive-mode dial to allow the driver to take the hassle out of trailer reversing. Up to a point, anyway. But there’s also a great check-list menu on the info-screen to detect failed trailer lighting and other problems. The Touring Pack is now standard on many versions but still optional of cheaper variants.

Which ever version you buy, any dual-cab 4X4 Ranger styleside has a tub measuring 1547mm long, 1584 wide, 1224mm between the wheel arches (to accept a standard pallet) and a loading height of 816mm. The tub also features inner tie-down rails, a light, a tailgate-lift assist ram and cupholders moulded into the tailgate’s inner side.

Payloads for the various Ranger models are determined by kerb mass, which means the lightest variant, the XL can carry 1135kg, while the heaviest, the Platinum, is restricted to 981kg. Still a decent figure, to be honest.

Inside, the Ranger’s cabin ranges from the starkly utilitarian in the XL (vinyl floor mats and cloth seats to name just a couple of features) to extremely plush in the case of the Platinum with its four USB ports, wireless phone charging and even a row of six switch blanks ready for aftermarket accessories.

The front seating is definitely superior to the rear seat in the Ranger, and the latter features a fairly flat cushion and a backrest.

Lesser versions of the Ranger also get a conventional park-brake compared with the electronic one on more expensive models. We’ll take the manual version any day.

With its 2215kg kerb weight and 4100kg GVM, our test vehicle has a sizeable 1885kg payload rating.

It’s also rated to tow up to 2000kg of braked trailer and with its 6100kg GCM (or how it can legally carry and tow at the same time), that means it can tow its maximum trailer weight while hauling its maximum payload to ensure optimum versatility.

The cargo bay, which offers a cave-like 9.0 cubic metres of load volume and internal lighting front and rear, has internal dimensions of 3316mm length (with bulkhead), 1732mm width and 1719mm height.

So, with 1350mm between the rear wheel-housings, it can comfortably fit two standard 1165mm-square Aussie pallets or up to four 1200 x 800mm Euro pallets, held in place by a choice of 10 floor-mounted load-anchorage points.

The cargo bay is accessed through a single kerbside sliding door with a wide 1260mm opening, or symmetrical rear barn-doors with large handles on each pillar to assist operator access.

The barn-doors also have internal storage bins and open to a full 180-degrees to assist forklift and loading dock access. Thoughtfully, their hinge design also holds the doors firmly open at 180 degrees, to minimise the chance of wind gusts slamming them shut with potential injury to the operator.

There’s also plenty of cabin storage starting with two tiers of bins in each door, with the highest being spacious enough to hold large bottles.

There's also a deep shelf on the passenger side lower dash, a large lidded compartment in the central dash-pad and overhead shelves with lockable storage on the passenger side. Plus, the dash offers a total of eight cup/small-bottle holders.

The base cushion of the two-passenger bench seat is also hinged at the front, which allows it to tilt forward and provide access to a large hidden storage area beneath.

A crew of three can travel in relative comfort (for a commercial van that is) thanks to a central seating position that provides a sturdy hoop-handle for support, sufficient knee clearance from the dash even for tall people, and a reasonably flat and spacious floor area.

The cabin also features the latest next-gen 'MBUX' multimedia system with 10.25-inch touchscreen, which for the first time offers wireless connectivity for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

There’s also digital radio and enhanced functionality including an optional navigation upgrade with seven years of map updates.

Our test vehicle is the 417CDI MWB (Medium Wheelbase) Panel Van with standard roof height, which comes equipped with a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel engine and nine-speed automatic transmission for a list price of $86,018.

Our example is fitted with a couple of factory options, including the 'Cargo Pack' ($2265) which comprises a two-passenger bench seat, solid cabin bulkhead with fixed window and side-entrance assist handle, wooden cargo bay load floor and floor-to-roof wall-trim using 5.0mm-thick wood panelling.

It also has optional 'High-Tech Silver' metallic paint ($2534) which combined with the Cargo Pack raises the total price to $90,817.

In addition to the latest model’s upgraded safety (see Safety) and comfort/convenience (see Design) features, our test vehicle comes standard with 16-inch steel wheels and 235/65 R16C tyres plus a full-size spare, keyless start, steering wheel paddles for manual shifting, multi-function leather steering wheel, three USB-C ports and two 12-volt sockets, side marker lights and heated exterior mirrors.

There’s also daytime running lights, a parking package with reversing camera and front/rear parking sensors, traffic sign assist, tyre pressure monitoring and lots more.

While the V6 turbo-diesel remains unchanged with its 184kW and mighty 600Nm of torque. It remains paired with the 10-speed automatic transmission and the availability of a '4-Auto' setting for the drive system which allows for the use of all-wheel drive on dry bitumen.

The big change to the V6’s status is that it’s now available across the entire dual-cab 4X4 range, right down to the XL version with its rubber floor mats and steel wheels.

Now, if you were cynical, you might suggest Ford has made the V6 more widely available, because the four-cylinder engine option (once the only one available on lesser versions like the XL) has lost a bit of mojo in the transition to Ranger 2026.5.

The thought of a carmaker going backwards on specification and output for an engine goes against the grain somewhat, but in this case, the move to a simpler, potentially more robust engine design makes some sense in the context of long-term ownership costs.

Opinions are divided on how many of the previous 2.0-litre engines posed problems for their buyers, but the fact remains that the wet timing belt (where the rubber belt runs in an oil bath) design had a less-than-perfect track record here and abroad. And even if failures were only a small percentage of units sold, when that failure happens to you, it’s a 100 per cent failure rate…

So, Ford has re-engineered the 2.0-litre unit to use an utterly conventional timing chain, designed new pistons, a different fuel-injection system and reduced the turbocharger count from two to one. The theory is the more robust timing chain will reduce problems, while the single-turbo installation will save money at a production level. In the process, however, both power and torque outputs have fallen. In this case, the bi-turbo engine’s 154kW and 500Nm have fallen to 125kW and 405Nm respectively in the new engine.

Payloads and towing capacity have not been affected (the Ranger can still tow 3500kg) but there’s speculation that 125kW won’t drag a huge trailer around with the same ease as the old engine, even with the 10-speed automatic that’s fitted. Hence the V6 being made available across the board. Allegedly.

The counterpoint is that Ford has dropped the final-dive ratio of the 2.0-litre Rangers which should help with in-gear flexibility and acceleration.

The 2.0-litre-engined Rangers also lack the 4-Auto setting and operate in two-wheel drive mode exclusively on bitumen.

The (OM654) 2.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel, which meets Euro 6 emissions standards using AdBlue, produces 125kW of power at 3800rpm with peak torque of 400Nm served between 1700-2400rpm. The nine-speed torque converter automatic offers the choice of sequential manual-shifting using the steering wheel-mounted paddles.

Ford claims a combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel economy figure of 6.8 litres per 100km for the new 2.0-litre engine. We didn’t get too close to that, but that’s hardly surprising given real-world figures almost never match the official test figure. Rather, we managed 8.2L/100km in mainly relaxed country driving and about 9.5L/100km with a little peak hour traffic thrown into the mix. Either way, the Ranger should be pretty frugal.

The real question mark crops up when you hook a bobcat and tandem trailer to the tow-bar. We’ll have to wait and see how that affects economy on the 'little' Ranger engine.

Meantime, those real-world figures, combined with the Ford’s 80-litre fuel tank, mean a typical range of something like 800 to 900km between visits to the service-station.

And while you might be thinking a newly-developed, modern turbo-diesel would need AdBlue, the 2.0-litre as fitted to the Ranger line-up does not.

The dash display was claiming average combined consumption of 9.5L/100km when we stopped to refuel at the completion of our 281km test, of which about one third of that distance was hauling a heavy payload (see Driving).

Our own figure of 11.7 (based on actual fuel bowser and tripmeter figures) was higher but still reasonable economy for a vehicle in this GVM class in mostly urban use.

So, based on our own figures, you could expect a ‘real world’ driving range of around 800km from its 93-litre tank, which has been enlarged from 71 litres as part of the latest upgrades.

Since Ford has made no changes to suspension, steering, tyre specifications or braking hardware, it’s no surprise to find that the new version feels very familiar.

The V6 variants remain something of a revelation after some of the competitors’ four-cylinder engines, and the sophistication and refinement comes through immediately with the V6 slurring away at its upshifts and generally feeling like a high-end solution to a dual-cab propulsion problem.

But of course, we knew that, didn’t we? Exactly, so the big questions surround the new 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel with its new specification and downgraded outputs. Specifically, can 125kW and 405Nm cut it in this cut-throat market?

The initial answer appears to be yes. In fact, when you consider that not every dual-cab owner tows three-and-a-half tonnes with one, you can see why a smaller, more frugal engine might do the job. And there’s always the optional V6 if the job demands it, right?

Acceleration is nothing like the V6’s of course, but the new four-cylinder rolls along at highway speeds without a problem and can still accelerate to overtake. That’s largely a function of having 10 gears and a lower final-drive ratio, but the latter doesn’t seem to have made the engine feel manic or short-geared in any way.

Normal overtaking ranges, say, 70km/h to 100km/h feature lots of mid-range and it’s only when you wring the new engine out that it starts to feel a little puny at the top end. But it never fails to impress with its refined feel and fairly low noise levels and, if nothing else, it proves that smaller capacity four-cylinder engines have an inherent advantage in being smoother and silkier to rev than some of the big bangers out there.

Perhaps if you jumped straight from the outgoing bi-turbo variant into the new single-turbo Ranger, you might notice a decent fall-off in performance, but if you’d never driven a bi-turbo, you’ll never dismiss the new engine as anything other than completely adequate.

The caveat to all that is when we get to hitch a big load to the new Ranger and see what a couple or three tonnes does to that apparent adequacy.

Large handles on the doors and overhead shelves assist climbing aboard and there’s enough adjustment in the well-bolstered seat and leather-rimmed steering wheel to find a comfortable position.

Driver views from all angles are excellent thanks to well-designed mirrors along with cameras supported by active aids like blind-spot monitoring etc.

The cabin, with its high roof relative to seat height, has a spacious and airy feel and all controls are reasonably intuitive and easy to reach.

Unladen ride quality is surprisingly supple for a vehicle with a 6.0-tonne-plus GCM rating, combined with excellent steering feel that strikes a fine balance between minimal turning effort at low speeds (for loading etc) and firm handling response at higher speeds.

The drivetrain is also energetic, pulling strongly and cleanly from 1000rpm even though its maximum torque is tapped higher in the 1700-2400rpm zone. The automatic transmission has admirable refinement, with near-seamless shifting between its nine ratios.

The Sprinter is also impressively quiet at speeds up to 80km/h. Tyre and wind noise (the latter mainly around the large door mirrors) naturally increase at highway speeds, but remain far from intrusive. And with the engine requiring less than 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h, it’s well-suited to highway work.

To test its load-carrying ability, we forklifted 1.3 tonnes into the cargo bay which with driver equalled a payload of 1.4 tonnes. That's still almost half a tonne less than its limit.

Not surprisingly, it handled this load with ease, as handling and braking were largely unaffected and the ride quality became smoother thanks to such a big increase in sprung weight. Even so, the rear springs only compressed about 30mm.

It easily conquered our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h with this load onboard, as the auto downshifted to fourth gear to tap maximum torque when hauling this load to the summit.

Engine-braking on the way down, in a manually-selected second gear, wasn’t as robust but not unexpected given a 2.0-litre engine trying to restrain 1.4 tonnes of payload on a steep descent. Even so, the quartet of disc brakes efficiently kept speeds in check.

Overall, it was an impressive performance. However, we did note that the speed sign recognition function was not working for the duration of our test. And some welcome enhancements would be a driver’s left footrest and a fold-down inboard armrest for the driver’s seat, as fitted to its smaller Vito sibling.

ANCAP ratings do not apply to Heavy Commercial vehicles. Even so, in addition to the Sprinter’s existing long menu of passive and active safety features, the latest range adds significant enhancements as standard equipment including thorax-protecting airbags for driver and passenger, lane-keeping assist, traffic sign assist, rain-sensing wipers, tyre pressure monitoring and a parking package with reversing camera and front/rear sensors.

Also new is ‘Moving Off Information Assist’ which utilises a camera mounted in the grille plus six ultrasonic sensors to monitor an area 3.7 metres in front of the steered direction of the vehicle and 0.5 metres to the side.

This automatically activates at start-up and remains active up to 10km/h. So, if a road user is detected in the monitored area, the driver is alerted by audible and visual signals.

The latest range also introduces ‘Sideguard Assist’ which provides extended detection in the blind-spot on the passenger side. It activates when the vehicle is stationary and at low speeds, providing an extra set of eyes during parking, low-speed manoeuvring and traffic congestion.

Ford’s standard factory warranty for the Ranger is five years/unlimited kilometres.

There’s also the option of pre-paid servicing, available when you purchase the vehicle brand-new. By locking in the servicing cost, you can pay for the first four scheduled services up to 60,000km or four years, whichever comes first. That’s worked out in accordance with the vehicle’s 12 month/15,000km service intervals.

The Ford Australia website also has a service-cost calculator function where you can input your vehicle’s details and a fixed-price service cost will be worked out for you.

Ford Australia also has a huge dealer network, so parts and servicing should not represent a problem anywhere in the country.

Warranty is five years/250,000km whichever occurs first and includes a roadside assist support package.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/40,000km. Pay-as-you-go capped-pricing for the first five scheduled services totals $5905, or a pricey average of $1181 per year. Service plans are also available.