Ford Ranger vs Mazda BT-50

What's the difference?

The Ford Ranger is a strong starting point for a plug-in hybrid upgrade. And there are valid pros accompanying the addition of a high-voltage battery. But those benefits aren’t primarily seen on the road.

In fact, given its higher price, the Ranger PHEV loses out when compared to its BYD and GWM rivals, which offer more features and a far higher EV range at lower prices.

The Ranger doesn’t compromise its ‘ute-ness’ as its rivals do in different ways. But its target audience is likely relatively small. One that's willing to fork out for a capable, comfortable ute that can power a campsite or run tools on the job.

If you want an EV that just looks like a ute, this isn’t it. But if you're after a dual cab that can do proper ute things, with a bonus when it comes to efficiency and convenience, you’ll need deep pockets.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The MY25 Mazda BT-50 benefits from its robust Isuzu underpinnings to excel in this dual cab-chassis configuration, particularly with Mazda’s premium heavy-duty aluminium tray as fitted to our test vehicle. Fact is, apart from the big drop in payload required to tow 3500kg (but it’s not alone there) it’s hard to find any major flaws. Overall, it’s an excellent workhorse that would be well suited to a multitude of tradie tasks. 

The Ford Ranger is still one of the best-looking utes available, with a strong brand identity and a lack of design features that lean into trends - perhaps aside from the ‘C-shaped’ DRL signature.

There are only a few hints that any given Ranger you might be looking at is a plug-in hybrid, with the vehicle’s panels and general design features looking primarily the same.

The most obvious change is fender badging that outs the Ranger as a ‘PHEV’, though its lettering isn’t too ‘shouty’.

But to those more familiar with the Ranger, or anyone able to have a proper look around a PHEV, there are a couple of other giveaways.

For example, the Ranger plug-in has a new set of wheel designs that range from the 17-inch alloys on the XLT to the Stormtrak-specific 18s featuring 'Chill Grey' inserts as trim accents.

The Stormtrak can also be had in Chill Grey, the colour being exclusive to that variant along with the aforementioned unique trim design.

There are also plug outlets in the ute’s tub for access to the Ranger’s battery power. Harder to spot if you’re looking at one of the higher-spec variants that feature a roller cover.

Inside, it’s a similar story with the PHEV’s interior being standard Ranger fare aside from the button that controls its EV modes.

It must be said that Mazda’s stylists did a commendable job with the third-gen BT-50 when it launched in 2020. Five years later it still looks fresh and we’re yet to find anyone who doesn't like its styling, which is in stark contrast to its polarising predecessor.

Its exterior sculpting embodies Mazda’s design language to maintain a strong family resemblance to the popular CX line of SUVs, yet does not detract from the tough and purposeful appearance expected of a 4x4 ute.

The MY25 facelift includes a newly designed front bumper, radiator grille and unique LED headlights. At the rear, pick-up models incorporate what Mazda describes as a ‘mountain-inspired ridged design’ along the bottom edge of the tailgate, along with new LED tail-lights and a larger Mazda logo.

Apart from the mountain-inspired ridged design, also evident on the glove box lid, the latest XTR interior is largely unchanged, blending different shades of grey with satin chrome highlights on the dashboard and door linings, contrasting fabric seat trim, exposed stitching on seams and adjustable centre console air conditioning vents for rear seat passengers.

The Ford Ranger’s interior is impressive for a dual-cab ute when it comes to layout and functionality.

A large 12-inch touchscreen dominates the central space on the dash, but there are still physical controls for the climate settings and the screen has shortcuts to main functions thanks to Ford’s 'Sync' software.

A big 12.4-inch driver display is similarly handy, being clear in its layout and able to be customised to the extent you’d expect from a modern bit of kit.

As mentioned, in the XLT you miss out on a few goodies, but the phone charger found in other variants is placed out of the way, under the screen and behind the gear shift.

Cupholders are similarly out of the way of any buttons or controls, and the gear-shifter itself is mercifully a traditional one rather than a dial or buttons.

With everything in an ergonomically sensible place, it’s similarly comforting that the seats and the steering wheel can be adjusted to find a suitable position.

It’s still a dual-cab ute, so don’t anticipate ‘melt-into-the-seat’ levels of comfort, but the space on offer in the front and rear seats is enough for an adult to feel at ease on even a long trip.

Behind the cabin, there’s space for two euro pallets according to Ford, with a payload as high as 973kg for the XLT. The Stormtrak’s 808kg payload is the lowest of the bunch, with Sport (934kg) and Wildtrak (885kg) slotting in between.

There’s a spare tyre underneath the tub and the ability to tow a 3500kg braked trailer - all combining to make it the most functional workhorse on offer in the plug-in hybrid ute segment. The GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV can tow 3.5-tonne and the BYD Shark 6’s payload is okay, but neither can do it all.

That said, the Ranger falls short in the plug-in game, which we’ll get to shortly.

Our test vehicle’s 1910kg kerb weight and 3100kg GVM results in a meaty 1190kg payload rating. However, that drops to 891kg after you deduct the combined weight of the premium heavy-duty aluminium tray (243kg), nudge bar (9.0kg) and towing kit (47kg).

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 6000kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time), towing that weight would require a substantial 590kg reduction in payload to avoid exceeding the GCM.

Even though few (if any) BT-50 owners would need to tow 3500kg, it’s important to be aware of these numbers if the need arose, to ensure the combined weight of your vehicle and trailer does not exceed the legal limit.

The premium heavy-duty aluminium tray from Mazda’s genuine accessories range is a nice bit of kit with its Mazda-branded tailgate decals and mudguards.

The tray is almost square with internal dimensions of 1800mm length and 1777mm width. And it has numerous internal load-anchorage points, external rope-rails and a sturdy mesh-style rear window protector, plus removable ‘quick-lock’ ladder racks with fold-down load retainers up top.

There’s also a 1500mm-long underbody drawer with adjustable internal dividers and a four-stage incremental locking system. An HDP (High Density Polyethylene) 25-litre water tank complete with tap and handwash bottle-holder resides under the right side of the tray, with a sizeable and lockable HDP toolbox under the left side.

The driver and front passenger have comfortable bucket seats and the rear bench is also accommodating, with ample head and kneeroom even for tall people.

However, shoulder room would be tight for three big tradies, so like most dual cabs short of a full-size US pick-up it’s tolerable for short trips as a five-seater but works best as a four-seater for longer drives.

Cabin storage includes a large-bottle holder and bin in the base of each front door and the dash has upper and lower glove boxes, an overhead glasses holder and a pull-open compartment to the right of the driver’s knee for small items.

The centre console has an open tray at the front, dual small-bottle/cupholders in the centre and a small box at the rear with a contoured lid that doubles as a driver’s elbow rest.

Rear passengers get a large-bottle holder and small bin in each door, plus storage pockets on the front seat backrests and a pair of pop-out cupholders in the fold-down centre armrest.

The 60/40-split rear bench seat’s cushions can also swing up and be stored vertically if more internal load space is needed. This also reveals two underfloor compartments with lids for keeping valuables out of sight.

Our test vehicle is the XTR cab-chassis, which is available only with a 3.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel engine and six-speed automatic transmission, for a list price of $59,650.

The XTR is an upgraded version of the base model XT cab chassis equivalent which lists at $54,620, so for the extra $5030 you’ll pay for the XTR the standard equipment list expands to include 18-inch machined alloy wheels with 265/60 R18 tyres (and a full-size alloy spare), LED headlights/DRLs/front fog lamps, side-steps and power-fold mirrors.

The XTR cabin also comes standard with carpet, a leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift knob, three USB-C ports and a 12-volt socket, fold-down rear centre armrest, eight-speaker audio with digital radio and wired/wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity.

The cabin has smart keyless entry (with auto central-locking when you walk away from the vehicle), dual-zone climate control and 9.0-inch multimedia colour touchscreen, now thankfully with physical volume and tuning dials.

In addition to the facelifted styling, is updated software for the touchscreen which includes tyre pressure monitoring and various off-road-focused displays. The driver also gets a new 7.0-inch customisable 'Multi-Information Display' (MID).

Our example, finished in optional 'Ingot Silver Metallic' ($695), is also fitted with several items tailored for tradies from Mazda’s genuine accessories range, including a premium heavy-duty aluminium tray ($7888), SP nudge bar ($1432) and 3500kg tow pack ($1389) which combined add more than $11K to the price.

The Ranger PHEV remains an off-road-capable 4x4 ute, with all four wheels receiving power. But the drivetrain is not your standard Ranger gear.

Ford’s 2.3-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder 'EcoBoost' engine does the heavy lifting, aided by an electric motor mounted between it and the transmission.

The engine isn’t unproven in the ute game. In fact, it’s found in some variants of the current-gen Ranger’s cousin, the Volkswagen Amarok.

In the Ranger PHEV, it makes 138kW and 411Nm which, paired with the 75kW electric motor, contributes to a total 207kW and 697Nm output, transferred to all four wheels via Ford’s 10-speed automatic transmission.

Of course, the ute’s 4WD system is able to be set to '2H', '4A', '4H' or '4L' and has a rear diff-lock to assist in traversing tricky terrain.

The BT-50’s drivetrain, shared with its D-Max donor, comprises Isuzu’s proven Euro 5-compliant 3.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel that produces 140kW of power at 3600rpm and 450Nm of torque between 1600-2600rpm.

This is paired with an Aisin-sourced six-speed torque converter automatic featuring ‘intelligent’ protocols that prompt downshifting to assist with engine-braking on steep descents (great when towing) and overdrive on the top two ratios optimises fuel economy during highway driving.

It also offers the choice of sequential manual-shifting, which can be handy when hauling and/or towing heavy loads particularly in hilly terrain.

The part-time, dual-range 4x4 transmission features 2.482:1 low-range reduction and a switchable locking rear diff

Ford claims the Ranger PHEV sips 2.9L/100km according to NEDC testing, but like many plug-in hybrids that would be difficult to achieve without constantly stopping to charge.

It’s also only able to charge the 11.8kWh lithium-ion battery at a 3.5kW rate under AC power and it takes around four hours to do so. There’s no DC fast charging.

It’s got a 70-litre fuel tank, and requires minimum 91 RON petrol.

During the launch drive, the highest figure reasonable driving produced in terms of a fuel consumption on the trip computer was 9.6L/100km during battery charging.

So, while theoretical range is around 2400km, that closer to real-world number reduces the distance between fills to a still useful 730km.

Ford didn’t offer an expected general consumption figure for ‘low-power’ driving - i.e. while the battery isn’t being actively charged but also isn’t carrying enough juice to fully propel the ute.

Mazda claims an official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) average of 8.0L/100km and the dash display was showing 10.2 at the completion of our 369km test, which comprised a mix of city, suburban and highway driving of which about one third was hauling a near-maximum payload.

Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was slightly higher again at 10.6L/100km but still within the usual 2.0-3.0L/100km discrepancy between official and real-world figures and not bad for a two-tonne-plus 4x4 ute.

So, based on our figure, you could expect a realistic driving range of around 700km from its 76-litre tank.

During a presentation and Q&A to media before the launch drive program, the Ford Australia team was keen to spruik how handy the PHEV’s battery would be for things like powering worksite equipment or for use during camping trips.

Alternately, focus on how the battery might come into play while on the road was modest. And behind the wheel it became clear why.

On-paper, the 49km electric driving range seems handy, but the NEDC testing which produced that figure is known for being optimistic.

On top of that, the launch program's highway driving wasn’t prime EV territory. In fact, we were encouraged to keep the cars in ‘charge’ mode to leave enough electric power in reserve to experience the Ranger PHEV’s off-road capabilities.

As mentioned, fuel consumption doesn’t exactly skyrocket even while the engine is charging the battery, but to make the most of the Ranger’s EV range you’d want to have a relatively short commute.

In terms of its on-road manners, the Ranger’s status as a benchmark for the category means even with the extra weight of the battery, the PHEV performs well.

Its 75kW EV output means driving under the electric motor’s power alone is reserved for low speed, but it does well to boost the torque provided by the engine. While it’s no sports car, it doesn’t feel sluggish.

The Ranger’s suspension does well to balance relative softness when it comes to bumps and rough surfaces without feeling like it doesn’t have the ute's weight under control.

If you want the best on-road driving experience from a Ranger, a V6-powered variant will provide the balance of comfort and power you seek.

Off-road, the PHEV’s capability is likely more than enough for most weekend warriors.

The electrified ute’s ability to use battery and engine to carefully cover terrain that would likely intimidate any off-road beginner is impressive. But we'll wait until we can get the Ranger PHEV onto home turf for a proper off-highway test before making a definitive judgement.

The cabin is spacious and, with side-steps plus large handles on the front windscreen pillars, it’s easy to climb aboard and find a comfortable driving position.

All-around vision is good and active driver aids like blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and reversing camera instil confidence, particularly when hauling taller loads that block rear vision through the central mirror.

The engine is responsive in city and suburban use, thanks largely to its broad spread of torque across a 1000rpm-wide band from 1600-2600rpm that showcases its useful flexibility. The six-speed automatic has well-spaced ratios and shift calibrations that feel like they get the best out of this engine, either unladen or when hauling heavy loads.

It feels well-planted on the road and displays sure-footed handling if driven at appropriate speeds for a high-riding 4x4 ute, combined with excellent steering feel and responsive braking.

The unladen ride is firm, as you’d expect given the heavy-duty rear suspension unique to cab-chassis models, but the combined sprung weight of the tray and tow bar ensure it’s not too harsh.

To test its payload rating we strapped 830kg onto the load tray, which with driver and half a tank of diesel was a snip under its GVM limit. Even so, the rear leaf-springs only compressing 40mm under this loading, which left more than 40mm of bump-stop clearance that ensured no bottoming-out on our test route.

It hauled this big load with competence and a smoother ride quality, given the large increase in sprung weight allowed the heavy-duty rear suspension to do what it’s primarily designed to do.

There was also minimal effect on steering and braking response and the engine’s ample torque was not phased by this payload, particularly on our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h.

Engine-braking on the way down was also robust, highlighting the advantage of larger displacement engines (3.0-litres-plus) on overrun when restraining heavy loads on steep descents.

It also has low engine, tyre and wind noise at highway speeds, where the engine requires less than 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h thanks to its overdriven top gear with full torque converter lock-up.

This ensures the BT-50 is a comfortable and economical highway cruiser, with average fuel consumption that quickly drops into single figures on long hauls.

It has a maximum five-star ANCAP rating originally awarded in 2020 and updated in 2022 in accordance with D-Max upgrades.

The benchmark safety menu is packed with passive and active safety features highlighted by multiple airbags including full side-curtains and the latest in low/high speed AEB with pedestrian/cycle/motorcycle detection, lane-keeping, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, reversing camera, trailer sway control, tyre pressure monitoring and much more.

For junior tradies there are ISOFIX child-seat anchorages and top-tethers for the outer rear seating positions.

Ford’s five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the Ranger PHEV, but like all electrified Fords there’s an eight-year or 160,000km warranty on the high-voltage battery.

Ford also has set pricing for the first five years of servicing at a reasonable $399 per service, with the recommended interval set at 12 months or 15,000km.

Our test vehicle comes with a five-year/unlimited km warranty.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first.

Mazda’s ‘estimated service cost’ for the first five years/75,000km totals $2547 which is an average of $509 annually.