Mazda BT-50 vs Ford Ranger

What's the difference?

Key to the success of the BT-50 XS will be acceptance by fleet buyers. The vehicle, however, seems to be pretty well considered as far as that goes, although as with any stripped-down model, there are features that will be missed. Things like the manual air-conditioning probably won’t make much difference, but the lack of a tyre pressure monitoring system is a bigger issue for a working vehicle. Performance from the smaller engine is still well within acceptable parameters, but we reckon any buyer considering using much of the 3500kg touring capacity would be better off with the 3.0-litre engine offered in the rest of the BT-50 range.

The Mazda is not the best riding of its ilk, and there are competitors with bigger cabins, although, notably, at this point on the pricing ladder, these are often from China rather than Thailand where the Mazda is built. Ultimately it will come down to whether the smaller engine and reduced performance is an issue and also whether the money saved over the bigger-engined BT-50 is enough to justify that and the loss of some creature comforts. But since fleet managers are notoriously hard-nosed about this stuff, there’s a good chance to BT-50 XS will find a market.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

The Super Duty is the most formidable workhorse in the Ranger fleet. It projects a feeling of immense strength each time you drive it, reflecting payload and tow ratings well beyond traditional limits for vehicles of this size combined with formidable all-terrain capabilities. For tradies wanting the ultimate Ranger workhorse, the Super Duty is clearly in a class of its own - a class which it created.

Targeting tradies and fleet customers has meant Mazda has embraced the concept of factory accessories. Right now, there are options for tougher front bumpers, bull-bars, snorkels, drop-side trays, an awning, wheel-arch flares (for bigger, aftermarket wheel and tyre packages) driving lights, roof racks, canopies, tub-drawer systems and even a dual battery set-up. All these factory options carry the full Mazda warranty.

But Mazda has gone even further with accessory packs aimed directly at different fleet markets. For instance, there’s the Mine-Spec Pack which incorporates a park-brake alarm, high-mounted brake lights, a reversing buzzer, work-lights, LED rear lighting and pre-wired switches for auxiliary and beacon lighting.

Externally, Mazda's design brief for the BT-50 has clearly been to not frighten the horses. But it's better than that, because it has actually emerged as one of the better looking utes out there. In XS trim, even the steel wheels add a no-nonsense flavour to the overall effect. And where some of the competition appear to be trying very hard to ape the full-sized US-made pick-ups, the Mazda is its own thing.

Inside, the smaller info screens and simple layout in basic black tell the budget story. At the same time, there's a lot to like in terms of the clear, simple analogue gauges and the no-fuss controls including the conventional T-bar, park-brake and ignition key. There's a look and feel that also suggests this is a ute that should be able to take a few knocks in the course of earning a living.

The Super Duty, originally based on Ford’s F-series full-size US pickup range, has been a mainstay on farms, building sites and in remote terrain since its inception as a standalone model in 1998, but this is the first time the nameplate has been applied to the Aussie designed and developed Ranger.

Ford claims the Ranger Super Duty resulted from extensive consultation with workers in industries that depend on their trucks in the harshest remote environments, from forestry crews and emergency service workers to land managers and fleet teams.

The challenge was to create a medium-sized truck with higher payload/tow ratings and greater all-terrain capability, as the only vehicles strong enough to carry their gear were too big and unwieldy to access critical locations.

In response, the Ranger Super Duty features a unique reinforced version of the Ranger’s chassis frame, incorporating readily accessible mounting points for a variety of aftermarket accessories and specialised equipment.

There’s also a new heavy-duty rear axle assembly with the largest and strongest differential ever fitted to a production Ranger for enhanced load-carrying capacity, paired with a unique uprated version of the US Bronco Raptor’s front diff.

The two-speed transfer case also has larger and stronger components than the regular Ranger and its low-speed gearset has been upgraded to match the F-series Super Duty.

Other chassis enhancements include uprated eight-stud wheel hubs with stronger bolts, improved cooling system to manage engine temps under heavy loads and during sustained off-road driving, a sealed engine snorkel and high-mounted breathers for the drivetrain/fuel system to enable its 850mm wading depth (50mm deeper than standard Ranger) and more. There was also a brutal and prolonged durability testing program to validate its Super Duty status.

Off-road credentials include steep 36.3 degrees approach, 26.9 degrees ramp breakover and 29.3 degrees departure angles, 299mm ground clearance and an expansive 13.6-metre turning circle which is the largest of all Ranger variants including the wide-tyred Raptor.

With a choice of cab-chassis of pick-up tub, not to mention the option of a single or dual-cab body in cab-chassis form, the XS allows for a fair bit of creativity in how it’s configured. The cab-chassis, for instance, will accept a conventional drop-side alloy tray or any number of service body configurations right up to camper bodies.

The stock tub on the pick-up version gets a drop-in liner but there’s no power outlet or light that some of the competition offer. The tie-down points are also a bit disappointing with two lower points in the rear of the tub and a pair of higher points in the front. Experience tells us that high-mounted tie-down points are vastly less practical than anchor points mounted close to the cargo floor.

The move to the larger engine has, however, increased the Mazda’s towing ability. From the previous version’s 3000kg towing limit, the new 2.2 can now legally tow 3500kg (with a braked trailer and approved tow-hitch). Payloads vary according to specification, but range from about 1000kg right up to 1379kg for the XS singe-cab-chassis.

The factory-option drop-side tray carries it’s load up high, but offers a flat floor with no wheel-arch intrusions. The standard tub is not as large in any direction, but does have a damped tailgate for safety (you can’t drop it) and convenience (the gas struts help raise it).

In the cabin, you get USB charging ports (two in the front, one in the rear seat) and there are central air-vents for the rear seat of dual-cab models. The dual-cab also has an under-seat storage area, two gloveboxes and a 60/40 split fold rear bench. The doors feature bottle holders and there’s a flip-down glasses compartment in the roof lining.

While the front seats are comfy enough for bigger drivers, the rear seat also goes against dual-cab tradition a little by having plenty of room in every direction, as well as a rational seat-back angle.

Proof of the increased solidity of the Ranger Super Duty single cab-chassis is its hefty 2518kg kerb weight, which in bare cab-chassis form (without tray) is 625kg more than a standard 2.0L Ranger XL single cab-chassis 4x4 equivalent.

The Super Duty’s 4500kg GVM results in a huge 1982kg payload limit. It’s also rated to tow up to 4500kg of braked trailer and with its towering 8000kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can tow its maximum 4.5 tonne trailer weight while hauling almost one tonne of payload.

These are big numbers when compared to our standard XL Ranger example, given that the Super Duty has a 645kg higher payload rating, 1000kg higher tow rating and 1650kg higher GCM rating.

The galvanised full steel tray is equipped with six internal load anchorages, each rated up to 1800kg, which lie flush with the checker-plate floor when not in use.

There’s also external rope rails beneath the tray along each side and a sturdy front bulkhead with wire-mesh rear window protection.

As previously highlighted, this tray ensemble includes a driver-side lockable toolbox and passenger-side water tank (complete with handwash pump bottle) mounted behind their respective rear wheels.

Its work-focused interior is a comfortably familiar place for Ranger single cab-chassis workhorse owners, with fabric bucket seats, wipe-clean vinyl floor and large ‘Super Duty’ lettering embossed in the passenger side dash.

Cabin storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door, pop-out cupholders on each side of the dash, an overhead glasses holder, upper/lower glove boxes plus a well-equipped centre console with wireless phone charging, USB ports, two cupholders, 400W (230V) inverter and a storage box with internal 12V socket and padded lid that doubles as an elbow rest.

The Ranger Super Duty is currently available in a trio of cab-chassis configurations comprising single cab, extended cab and dual cab body styles, with a dual cab ute variant and higher-grade XLT trim option due in mid-2026.

Our test vehicle is the single cab-chassis, which like all Super Duty variants comes standard with a 3.0-litre V6 turbo-diesel, 10-speed automatic and full-time 4WD, for a list price of $82,990 plus on-road costs.

Its standard equipment list includes rugged 18-inch steel wheels with 33-inch tall General Grabber 275/70 R18 all-terrain tyres and a full-size spare.

There’s also LED headlights/front fog lights/daytime running lights, zone lighting (360-degree lighting around the vehicle), a sealed engine snorkel, 4500kg tow-bar with integrated trailer brake controller and towing assistance features, onboard scales to help calculate payloads, composite side steps, heated door mirrors with puddle lamps, a frame-mounted steel bumper, twin recovery points front and rear, high-strength steel underbody armour, a big 130-litre fuel tank and more.

The work-focused interior features smart key entry and push-button start, an electric parking brake, 400W (230V) inverter, 12V socket, three USB ports, wireless phone charging, overhead auxiliary switch bank, dual-zone climate and more.

The driver is treated to a configurable 8.0-inch colour digital instrument cluster plus a big 12-inch central touchscreen for a multimedia system that includes 'SYNC' voice activation, wireless 'FordPass'/Apple/Android connectivity and digital radio.

Factory options and accessories can be ordered individually but Ford also offers three optional equipment packs tailored for different vehicle applications comprising the 'Work Pack', 'Farm Pack' and 'Adventure Pack', with pricing dependent on cab type and tray finish.

Our example showcases the heavy-duty galvanised steel tray, water tank with handwash bottle, lockable toolbox and all-weather floor mats shared by all three packs, plus the Work Pack’s 'Integrated Device Mounting System' (IDMS) and wheel nut (tension) indicators, the Farm Pack/Adventure Pack’s ARB Summit bull bar and the Adventure Pack’s rock sliders and high capacity Warn winch.

It’s also fitted with a rear ladder rack from Ford’s genuine accessories range, so depending on what combination of options and/or accessories are ordered (combined with on-road costs) you could pay more than $100K, drive-away.

The new engine capacity of 2.2 litres is up from the 1.9 of the previous XS version but still well short of the 3.0 litres of the more expensive BT-50 versions. And the specifications are pretty much exactly what you’d expect with the new 2.2 just about splitting the difference between the old 1.9 and the 3.0.

In this case, that equates to 120kW of power and 400Nm of torque, while the 1.9 was good for 110kW and 350Nm, and the 3.0 sports 140kW and 450Nm. So, yep, somewhere right about the middle. And that makes sense given the new 2.2 uses the basic mechanical architecture of the 1.9.

But the switch up to the new engine brings one very important change and that’s the adoption of an eight-speed automatic to replace the six-speed unit fitted to the previous XS and the other BT-50s. That has an obvious potential benefit for drivability, but also for fuel economy.

Mazda has also added stop-start tech to the XS in the name of efficiency. But, as we’ve found many times before, the fuel economy benefits seem restricted to the official test results rather than the real world where this technology serves to annoy many drivers more than anything else.

If you opt or the four-wheel-drive variants, you’ll get a rear diff lock but you miss out on an on-road 4x4 setting. Considering the 2.2-litre’s newfound towing capacity (the full 3500kg of the competition), that lack of a 4x4 Auto setting is a shame, but not an unexpected one at this price-point.

All Ranger Super Duty models are powered by the same 3.0-litre V6 turbo-diesel, which meets tough Euro 6.2 emission standards using AdBlue. It produces 154kW of power at 3250rpm and a towering 600Nm of torque at 1750rpm.

This is paired with a 10-speed torque converter automatic with the choice of sequential manual-shifting using a toggle switch on the shift knob. It also offers seven drive modes to optimise performance in different terrain applications.

The full-time 4WD transfer case allows drivers to switch between high and low ranges and access other technologies when tackling difficult terrain including 'Trail Control' (low-speed off-road cruise control), 'Trail Turn Assist' (applies braking to the inside rear wheel to tighten turning radius), front and rear diff locks and more.

While one of the expected benefits of the 2.2-litre engine compared with the three-litre unit is a reduction in fuel consumption, the new 2.2 engine goes one big step further by actually being more frugal than the 1.9-litre engine it replaces. Well, in terms of the official government test, anyway.

The single cab-chassis model in new 2.2-litre, two-wheel-drive form posted a combined (urban-highway) fuel number of a creditable 6.9 litres per 100km. Compared with the mechanically similar 1.9 single cab-chassis, that’s a saving of 0.1 litres per kilometre, and a corresponding drop in tailpipe carbon emissions of 1 gram per kilometre.

To be honest, this small improvement is probably largely due to the stop-start system now fitted, which many drivers will turn off at the first opportunity. Even so, the new eight-speed transmission must also be playing a part, so let’s call the old and new engines line-ball in the real world.

The rest of the XS line-up scored official figures of 6.3 litres per 100km for the double-cab pick-up 4x2, 7.1 litres for the double cab-chassis 4x4 and 6.6 litres per 100km for the dual-cab pick-up 4x4.

With the BT-50’s standard 76-litre fuel tank, the theoretical range is more than 1000km. In reality, that’s going to be closer to 800km.

The BT-50 engines do not require AdBlue additive to reduce exhaust emissions.

Vehicles in this GVM class do not come with official fuel consumption figures. Even so, we clocked up 385km during our tradie-focused test which included our usual mix of suburban, city, highway and unsealed road driving, of which about one quarter was hauling its near maximum payload.

When we stopped to refuel at the end of our test, the dash display was showing average combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) consumption of 13.4L/100km which was lower than our own figure of 15.5 calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings.

That’s still decent economy for a heavy-duty off-roader driven in the daily grind of metro traffic, during which it hauled more than one tonne of payload for a day.

Therefore, based on our own test figures, you could expect a real-world driving range of more than 800km from its big 130-litre diesel tank.

Striking the right balance between ride comfort and load-lugging capacity has always been the big trick with utes in general. The fact is, there’s probably no ideal setting, especially considering the range of payloads a ute can be expected to carry on any particular day. In the BT-50’s case, Mazda has opted to go for a stiffer suspension tune. That means it can technically tow and haul with the best of them, but it also dictates that ride quality is far from what you’d call plush, even in this market segment.

The ute handles bumps best when the undulations don’t come too hot and fast. But strike a patch of high-frequency lumps and bumps and the suspension, particularly at the rear, starts to pogo about with a corresponding decline in ride control. The steering, too, seems to lack a little feel and is relatively slow-geared (although that has its benefits off-road).

The engine certainly does the job in isolation, but it’s likely to struggle a little with the full three-and-a-half tonnes on the hitch. It’s pretty noisy, too, and definitely sounds like a diesel, unlike some modern diesel designs that are more refined. There’s also a sense that Mazda has ditched some of the sound deadening of other BT-50 models, as the engine is certainly heard and felt. The optional snorkel moves the induction noise right into the driver’s window when it’s open, too.

But the new eight-speed automatic transmission is a beauty. Upshifts are crisp and smooth and even the downshifts as you approach a full stop are measured and calibrated to never intrude. And it’s nice to see a conventional T-bar shifter with no separate park button or non-intuitive movements required.

We didn’t get a chance to try the BT-50’s off-road chops, but past experience tells us that the Mazda will be pretty good. As with many four-wheel-drive utes, the limiting factor will be the standard tyres fitted at the factory.

It has a comfortable driving position with huge door mirrors providing commanding views. There’s also plenty of headroom for blokes my size (186cm) plus manual adjustment of the steering wheel and seat (including lumbar support) and a big left footrest for additional support.

The steering feels great like all Rangers, backed by sure-footed handling and strong braking response. The unladen ride quality is surprisingly supple for such a heavy lifter, given the combined effect of its baggy tyre sidewalls and the vehicle's substantial sprung weight helping to iron out the bumps.

Given its hefty kerb mass, acceleration feels slightly subdued compared to a standard V6 Ranger, as you’d expect. However, it still provides a satisfying surge of response in urban use thanks to 600Nm of torque and gearing that keeps the engine operating at or near its peak torque output at around 1800rpm.

It’s a relaxed highway cruiser with low engine and tyre noise. The most noticeable ingress at these speeds is mild wind buffeting around bulky fixtures like the engine snorkel, door mirrors and tray bulkhead, but it’s not overly intrusive with conversation not requiring raised voices.

To test its payload rating we firstly put our test vehicle on a public weighbridge. Unladen and with a full tank of fuel, it tipped the scales at 3130kg which after deducting the 2518kg base kerb weight revealed a sizeable combined accessory weight of 612kg.

So, given accessories are included in kerb weight, the Super Duty’s 'naked' 1982kg payload rating drops by the same amount to 1370kg, which is still a mighty capacity for a vehicle of this size.

We strapped 975kg on the tray, which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload of 1150kg (still more than 200kg under its limit) which the onboard scales vaguely confirmed. The robust rear leaf springs compressed a mere 30mm in response, leaving ample bump-stop clearance that ensured no bottoming out on our test route.

The Super Duty carried this payload with arrogant ease, maintaining its surefooted handling and scoffing at our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set climb. It also displayed strong engine braking on the way down, in a convincing demonstration of its heavy load hauling ability.

ANCAP safety ratings do not apply to vehicles in this GVM class but it has a suite of passive and active features including nine airbags, AEB with pedestrian detection, traffic sign recognition, tyre pressure monitoring, lane keeping and adaptive cruise control.

A new feature under the rear of the tray not previously available on Ranger cab-chassis variants is what Ford calls the ‘rear driver assistance technology bar’ which delivers numerous safety functions including front/rear parking aids, 360-degree camera, blind-spot monitoring with trailer coverage and reverse brake assist with cross-traffic alert.

Mazda’s standard five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty applies to the BT-50 range, and includes the first five years of roadside assistance, too.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. Capped-price servicing is available with the first five years of servicing costing $2188 on 4x2 versions and $2302 for 4x4 variants.

It’s worth mentioning that the BT-50’s new engine is Euro 5 compliant but doesn’t require AdBlue, reducing running costs.

The Ranger Super Duty comes with the same five years/unlimited km warranty shared by all Ranger models, with up to seven years of conditional roadside assist available if serviced at Ford dealerships.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first.

Ford offers a pre-paid service plan that provides capped price servicing for the first five scheduled services up to five years/75,000km, which totals $2100 or a reasonable average of $420 per service.

Ford has a long-established network of around 180 dealers spanning all states and territories including key rural and regional areas.