Mazda BT-50 vs Foton Tunland

What's the difference?

The MY25 Mazda BT-50 benefits from its robust Isuzu underpinnings to excel in this dual cab-chassis configuration, particularly with Mazda’s premium heavy-duty aluminium tray as fitted to our test vehicle. Fact is, apart from the big drop in payload required to tow 3500kg (but it’s not alone there) it’s hard to find any major flaws. Overall, it’s an excellent workhorse that would be well suited to a multitude of tradie tasks. 

The 2018 Tunland is a big improvement on any Chinese ute we’ve driven. Foton has done a commendable job in selecting known brand components and bringing them together into one cohesive package that delivers robust performance. Although it doesn’t quite equal the sum of its parts (mostly owing to poor safety features and some technical quirks), it’s still a lot of 4x4 dual cab ute for not a lot of money, and it's worthy of a test drive.

It must be said that Mazda’s stylists did a commendable job with the third-gen BT-50 when it launched in 2020. Five years later it still looks fresh and we’re yet to find anyone who doesn't like its styling, which is in stark contrast to its polarising predecessor.

Its exterior sculpting embodies Mazda’s design language to maintain a strong family resemblance to the popular CX line of SUVs, yet does not detract from the tough and purposeful appearance expected of a 4x4 ute.

The MY25 facelift includes a newly designed front bumper, radiator grille and unique LED headlights. At the rear, pick-up models incorporate what Mazda describes as a ‘mountain-inspired ridged design’ along the bottom edge of the tailgate, along with new LED tail-lights and a larger Mazda logo.

Apart from the mountain-inspired ridged design, also evident on the glove box lid, the latest XTR interior is largely unchanged, blending different shades of grey with satin chrome highlights on the dashboard and door linings, contrasting fabric seat trim, exposed stitching on seams and adjustable centre console air conditioning vents for rear seat passengers.

This is a big ute with an imposing presence, much like the Ford Ranger with which it shares similar dimensions (if not looks). Compared to the Ranger Wildtrak, the Tunland is 115mm shorter in wheelbase and 45mm shorter in overall length, but 20mm wider and 22mm taller. Ground clearance of 210mm is 27mm less and its kerb weight undercuts the Wildtrak by 250kg.

The Tunland uses traditional body-on-frame construction with a steel ladder-frame chassis, coil-spring twin-wishbone front suspension, leaf-spring live rear axle, four-wheel ventilated disc brakes and hydraulic power-assisted rack and pinion steering. 

Chrome body highlights include the grille, driving lights, side mirrors, door handle inserts and body badges. The dashboard and interior trim feature strongly textured grey surfaces with a tasteful mix of piano black, chrome, satin chrome and carbon fibre-look highlights. 

There’s good comfort for driver and front passenger, with a height-adjustable steering wheel and multi-adjustable driver’s seat with adequate under-thigh support that doesn’t feel too short like a Triton. The driving position is a big improvement on other Chinese utes we’ve tested, and is on par with many of the major players. The rear bench seat’s low cushion height results in raised upper thigh angles and knees, but also aids in providing unusually generous headroom, even for tall adults sitting in the higher centre position. 

Our test vehicle’s 1910kg kerb weight and 3100kg GVM results in a meaty 1190kg payload rating. However, that drops to 891kg after you deduct the combined weight of the premium heavy-duty aluminium tray (243kg), nudge bar (9.0kg) and towing kit (47kg).

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 6000kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time), towing that weight would require a substantial 590kg reduction in payload to avoid exceeding the GCM.

Even though few (if any) BT-50 owners would need to tow 3500kg, it’s important to be aware of these numbers if the need arose, to ensure the combined weight of your vehicle and trailer does not exceed the legal limit.

The premium heavy-duty aluminium tray from Mazda’s genuine accessories range is a nice bit of kit with its Mazda-branded tailgate decals and mudguards.

The tray is almost square with internal dimensions of 1800mm length and 1777mm width. And it has numerous internal load-anchorage points, external rope-rails and a sturdy mesh-style rear window protector, plus removable ‘quick-lock’ ladder racks with fold-down load retainers up top.

There’s also a 1500mm-long underbody drawer with adjustable internal dividers and a four-stage incremental locking system. An HDP (High Density Polyethylene) 25-litre water tank complete with tap and handwash bottle-holder resides under the right side of the tray, with a sizeable and lockable HDP toolbox under the left side.

The driver and front passenger have comfortable bucket seats and the rear bench is also accommodating, with ample head and kneeroom even for tall people.

However, shoulder room would be tight for three big tradies, so like most dual cabs short of a full-size US pick-up it’s tolerable for short trips as a five-seater but works best as a four-seater for longer drives.

Cabin storage includes a large-bottle holder and bin in the base of each front door and the dash has upper and lower glove boxes, an overhead glasses holder and a pull-open compartment to the right of the driver’s knee for small items.

The centre console has an open tray at the front, dual small-bottle/cupholders in the centre and a small box at the rear with a contoured lid that doubles as a driver’s elbow rest.

Rear passengers get a large-bottle holder and small bin in each door, plus storage pockets on the front seat backrests and a pair of pop-out cupholders in the fold-down centre armrest.

The 60/40-split rear bench seat’s cushions can also swing up and be stored vertically if more internal load space is needed. This also reveals two underfloor compartments with lids for keeping valuables out of sight.

Figures used here are provided by Foton Motor Australia Ltd and differ slightly from those shown in sales brochures. With a claimed kerb weight of 2000kg and 2925kg GVM, the Tunland is rated to carry a decent payload of up to 925kg.

It’s also rated to tow up to 3000kg of braked trailer, and with its 5925kg GCM, can tow that weight without having to reduce its peak payload, which gets a big tick from us.

Load tub dimensions of 1520mm length, 1580mm width and 440mm height provide more than a cubic metre of enclosed load volume. There’s also 1140mm between the wheel arches (not wide enough for a standard Aussie pallet) plus four sturdy tie-down points for securing loads.

Cabin storage options includes a bottle holder and pocket in each front door, a shallow tray inset in the centre dash pad, an overhead sunglasses holder and single glovebox. The centre console has an open cubby up front, two cup holders in the centre and a small lidded box at the back which doubles as a well-placed armrest.

Rear doors also have bottle holders and storage pockets, plus there are flexible storage pockets on the rear of each front seat and a fold out dual cup holder on the rear of the centre console. The rear bench seat’s base cushion also swings up through 90 degrees to reveal two hidden storage areas beneath for the wheel-changing tools and other smallish items.

The Foton Tunland is made in two model grades – the H-series (High End) and S-series (Super Value). The S-series (which is not sold here) is a low-cost, steel-wheeled version with components sourced from Chinese suppliers. The H-series is the premium model sold in Australia, so don’t let the red S badge on the tailgate confuse you as it did us at first. The S badge stands for Sport (not Super Value) and is only affixed to H-series vehicles.

The Tunland range comprises 4x2 manual ($26,990), 4x4 manual ($29,990), 4x4 auto ($33,990) and, thanks to its leather seats, 4x4 auto Luxury ($35,490). The 4x4 manual Luxury has recently had a big price reduction from $30,990 to $27,990, reflecting Australia’s growing preference for automatic transmissions.

Our test vehicle is the 4x4 auto, which for a snip under $34,000, brings numerous useful and desirable features including 17-inch alloys and beefy 265/65R17 road-biased tyres with matching spare, power/heated door mirrors, daytime running lights, side steps, auto headlights, rear-view camera and rear parking sensors, leather-trimmed steering wheel with audio/cruise control buttons, power windows, four-speaker sound system with multiple connectivity, eight-way (manual) adjustable driver’s seat and more. Plus there’s an extensive range of accessories.

The BT-50’s drivetrain, shared with its D-Max donor, comprises Isuzu’s proven Euro 5-compliant 3.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel that produces 140kW of power at 3600rpm and 450Nm of torque between 1600-2600rpm.

This is paired with an Aisin-sourced six-speed torque converter automatic featuring ‘intelligent’ protocols that prompt downshifting to assist with engine-braking on steep descents (great when towing) and overdrive on the top two ratios optimises fuel economy during highway driving.

It also offers the choice of sequential manual-shifting, which can be handy when hauling and/or towing heavy loads particularly in hilly terrain.

The part-time, dual-range 4x4 transmission features 2.482:1 low-range reduction and a switchable locking rear diff

One of the Tunland’s strong points is its Euro 5-compliant 2.8-litre four-cylinder Cummins ISF turbo-diesel, which Foton claims is the first ute in the world to be powered by this engine. It delivers 130kW at 3600rpm and 365Nm across a pretty flexible 1600-3200rpm torque band.

The smooth-shifting six-speed German automatic behind it is from another premium OEM supplier in Friedrichshafen AG, better known as ZF. Its gearing and shift protocols are well matched to the engine’s characteristics, offering a choice of full-auto mode or sequential manual shifting. Console buttons also provide a choice of Economy, Sport or Snow driving modes.

American OEM giant Borg Warner supplies the part-time, dual-range 4x4 transfer case, while another  major US supplier - Dana - has its stamp on the front drive-shafts and live rear axle assembly, featuring a 3.9:1 final drive and limited-slip differential. There’s no locking rear diff option available.

Mazda claims an official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) average of 8.0L/100km and the dash display was showing 10.2 at the completion of our 369km test, which comprised a mix of city, suburban and highway driving of which about one third was hauling a near-maximum payload.

Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was slightly higher again at 10.6L/100km but still within the usual 2.0-3.0L/100km discrepancy between official and real-world figures and not bad for a two-tonne-plus 4x4 ute.

So, based on our figure, you could expect a realistic driving range of around 700km from its 76-litre tank.

Foton’s official combined figure is 8.7L/100km but our ‘real world’ road test figures based on fuel bowser and trip meter readings came in at 12.2 (after 503km) and 12.1 (after 297km). Based on those figures, you could expect a driving range of around 620km from its 76-litre tank. However, after only 500km the fuel gauge needle was nudging the red zone and the low-fuel warning light came on, so we weren’t game to find out if there was another 100km-plus of driving available from the theoretical fuel remaining. 

The cabin is spacious and, with side-steps plus large handles on the front windscreen pillars, it’s easy to climb aboard and find a comfortable driving position.

All-around vision is good and active driver aids like blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and reversing camera instil confidence, particularly when hauling taller loads that block rear vision through the central mirror.

The engine is responsive in city and suburban use, thanks largely to its broad spread of torque across a 1000rpm-wide band from 1600-2600rpm that showcases its useful flexibility. The six-speed automatic has well-spaced ratios and shift calibrations that feel like they get the best out of this engine, either unladen or when hauling heavy loads.

It feels well-planted on the road and displays sure-footed handling if driven at appropriate speeds for a high-riding 4x4 ute, combined with excellent steering feel and responsive braking.

The unladen ride is firm, as you’d expect given the heavy-duty rear suspension unique to cab-chassis models, but the combined sprung weight of the tray and tow bar ensure it’s not too harsh.

To test its payload rating we strapped 830kg onto the load tray, which with driver and half a tank of diesel was a snip under its GVM limit. Even so, the rear leaf-springs only compressing 40mm under this loading, which left more than 40mm of bump-stop clearance that ensured no bottoming-out on our test route.

It hauled this big load with competence and a smoother ride quality, given the large increase in sprung weight allowed the heavy-duty rear suspension to do what it’s primarily designed to do.

There was also minimal effect on steering and braking response and the engine’s ample torque was not phased by this payload, particularly on our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h.

Engine-braking on the way down was also robust, highlighting the advantage of larger displacement engines (3.0-litres-plus) on overrun when restraining heavy loads on steep descents.

It also has low engine, tyre and wind noise at highway speeds, where the engine requires less than 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h thanks to its overdriven top gear with full torque converter lock-up.

This ensures the BT-50 is a comfortable and economical highway cruiser, with average fuel consumption that quickly drops into single figures on long hauls.

It’s a tight build free of rattles and squeaks, but the ride is too firm when empty or lightly loaded, particularly in the leaf-spring rear suspension which feels every small bump and delivers a sharp kick in your back over larger ones.

Otherwise, the chassis performance is more than adequate with its four-wheel disc brakes and steering that’s responsive and nicely weighted. Engine refinement and noise insulation are not best in class, but at highway speeds the combined engine, tyre and wind noise is certainly low enough to allow conversations without raised voices. The Cummins fairly lopes along here, with only 1800rpm at 100km/h and 2000rpm at 110km/h.

It’s also quite an agile and energetic performer around town, particularly in Sport mode. Maximum torque of 385Nm from the Cummins diesel is far from the strongest in this category, but the Tunland’s relatively low kerb weight helps to compensate for it with brisk getaways from standing starts and good throttle response in city and suburban driving. 

To test its GVM rating we strapped 770kg into the load tub, which with driver was only about 50kg short of its 925kg payload limit. The rear springs compressed 50mm while the nose rose 18mm. This resulted in a near-level ride height and noticeably improved ride quality, with no major decline in steering or braking response.  

With this load it was a competent performer on a variety of sealed and unsealed surfaces, including some bush tracks on which we engaged in both high and low range 4x4. Back on the bitumen, it also coped well with our two kilometre, 13 per cent gradient set climb, maintaining the 60km/h speed limit in third gear at 2250rpm all the way to the top. 

Engine braking on the way down, though, was compromised by the auto transmission’s unusual shift protocols. With second gear manually selected (in sequential shift mode) it over-rode that selection and shifted up to third when the engine reached 3250rpm on over-run. We tried it again several times and got the same result.

Not sure if it’s an engine protection measure on Foton’s part (redline is 4000rpm) but it’s not a nice surprise when you’re heavily loaded on a steep descent and relying on engine braking to help restrain your speed.

Our only other gripes were poor radio reception on the AM band (too bad if you like talkback) and the cruise control, which stopped working during our test and would not switch back on. 

Its three-star (out of five) ANCAP safety rating is poor, with single airbags for driver and front passenger only. 

Bosch electronic stability control includes brake-force distribution and hill-start assist, but there's no trailer sway control or AEB. The rear seat offers three head restraints and lap-sash belts. There are also ISOFIX attachments on the two outer seating positions, but no top tethers. Foton says it has identified differences in ISOFIX fittings between China and Australia, which it is now addressing for future export models. 

Our test vehicle comes with a five-year/unlimited km warranty.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first.

Mazda’s ‘estimated service cost’ for the first five years/75,000km totals $2547 which is an average of $509 annually.

Expect a three year/100,000km warranty and service intervals of six months/10,000km whichever occurs first. Roadside assistance is also available.