Foton Tunland vs Mazda BT-50

What's the difference?

In pure workhorse terms the V7-C 4x2 is the most impressive Chinese ute we’ve tested, with its ability to legally haul more than one tonne of payload while towing up to 3.5 tonnes of braked trailer unmatched by Chinese rivals (and most others). When you add purposeful styling, ample cabin space, generous appointments and a long warranty, all for less than $40K, the new Tunland model represents compelling value for money.

Key to the success of the BT-50 XS will be acceptance by fleet buyers. The vehicle, however, seems to be pretty well considered as far as that goes, although as with any stripped-down model, there are features that will be missed. Things like the manual air-conditioning probably won’t make much difference, but the lack of a tyre pressure monitoring system is a bigger issue for a working vehicle. Performance from the smaller engine is still well within acceptable parameters, but we reckon any buyer considering using much of the 3500kg touring capacity would be better off with the 3.0-litre engine offered in the rest of the BT-50 range.

The Mazda is not the best riding of its ilk, and there are competitors with bigger cabins, although, notably, at this point on the pricing ladder, these are often from China rather than Thailand where the Mazda is built. Ultimately it will come down to whether the smaller engine and reduced performance is an issue and also whether the money saved over the bigger-engined BT-50 is enough to justify that and the loss of some creature comforts. But since fleet managers are notoriously hard-nosed about this stuff, there’s a good chance to BT-50 XS will find a market.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

If Oscar Wilde was correct in claiming that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery then Ford and Ram should be blushing, judging by some of the Tunland’s styling cues which appear to draw strong design inspiration from Ford’s F-150 (V7) and Ram’s 1500 (V9).

Even so, our base model V7-C 4x2 does not look or feel like the afterthought that workhorse models can represent in commercial fleets. Its alloy wheels and splashes of bright body chrome combined with body-coloured doorhandles/mirror shells and a decorative tailgate looks more upmarket than you’d expect, particularly at this low price.

Riding on a long 3355mm wheelbase with external dimensions of 5617mm length, 2000mm width and 1910 height, its traditional body-on-frame design features twin wishbone front suspension, a leaf-spring live rear axle, electric power-assisted steering and four-wheel disc brakes.

And although it’s a 4x2 it shares many of its 4x4 siblings’ off-road credentials including a useful 240mm of ground clearance, 28 degrees approach/21 degrees ramp break-over/26 degrees departure angles, 700mm wading depth and 13.5-metre turning circle.

Its external dimensions create a spacious interior that nudges the benchmark for workhorse luxury. With Daimler truck DNA evident in its digital screen displays, the plush synthetic leather trim features a combination of quilted white stitching and contrasting red stitching, plus splashes of satin chrome and dark woodgrain highlights on the dash, centre console and door trims.

Targeting tradies and fleet customers has meant Mazda has embraced the concept of factory accessories. Right now, there are options for tougher front bumpers, bull-bars, snorkels, drop-side trays, an awning, wheel-arch flares (for bigger, aftermarket wheel and tyre packages) driving lights, roof racks, canopies, tub-drawer systems and even a dual battery set-up. All these factory options carry the full Mazda warranty.

But Mazda has gone even further with accessory packs aimed directly at different fleet markets. For instance, there’s the Mine-Spec Pack which incorporates a park-brake alarm, high-mounted brake lights, a reversing buzzer, work-lights, LED rear lighting and pre-wired switches for auxiliary and beacon lighting.

Externally, Mazda's design brief for the BT-50 has clearly been to not frighten the horses. But it's better than that, because it has actually emerged as one of the better looking utes out there. In XS trim, even the steel wheels add a no-nonsense flavour to the overall effect. And where some of the competition appear to be trying very hard to ape the full-sized US-made pick-ups, the Mazda is its own thing.

Inside, the smaller info screens and simple layout in basic black tell the budget story. At the same time, there's a lot to like in terms of the clear, simple analogue gauges and the no-fuss controls including the conventional T-bar, park-brake and ignition key. There's a look and feel that also suggests this is a ute that should be able to take a few knocks in the course of earning a living.

With its 2190kg kerb weight and 3305kg GVM, the V7-C 4x2 has a sizeable 1115kg payload rating which is the largest of the Tunland fleet.

It’s also rated to tow up to 3500kg of braked trailer and with its big 6805kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can tow its maximum trailer weight when carrying its maximum one-tonne-plus of payload. Those are impressive numbers unmatched by its Chinese rivals.

The load tub is protected by a spray-in liner and measures 1577mm long, 1650mm wide and 530mm deep, with 1240mm between the wheel housings ample for carrying Aussie or Euro pallets.

There’s also tailgate assist and load-anchorage points front and rear, but the front ones are mounted near the tops of the sidewalls which is not ideal for securing low loads. Anchorage points near floor level (like those at the rear) are best for securing loads of all heights.

There’s ample room in all key dimensions for the driver and front passenger, where storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door plus an overhead glasses holder and large glovebox.

A cleverly designed centre console offers two levels of storage, with dual USB-A ports and a 12v socket in the lower level. There’s also two bottle-holders in the centre and a large box at the back, with an internal A/C vent to keep contents cool and a padded lid that doubles as an elbow rest.

The rear doors open wide to allow easy access to a spacious rear bench seat, given I’m 186cm and have ample knee clearance and headroom when sitting behind the driver’s seat set in my position. There’s also a flat floor that saves central passengers from having to straddle a transmission hump but shoulder room for three big Aussies can be squeezy, which is okay for short trips but a limit of two would be ideal for longer journeys.

Rear passengers have access to adjustable air vents on the rear of the centre console, along with storage that includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door plus pockets on each front seat backrest. The centre seat’s backrest also folds forward to provide an armrest containing two cup-holders.

The 60/40-split base cushions can swing up and be stored vertically if more internal carrying space is required. And although there’s no dedicated under-seat storage compartments, there’s generous space for stowing soft items like sports bags, jackets etc.

With a choice of cab-chassis of pick-up tub, not to mention the option of a single or dual-cab body in cab-chassis form, the XS allows for a fair bit of creativity in how it’s configured. The cab-chassis, for instance, will accept a conventional drop-side alloy tray or any number of service body configurations right up to camper bodies.

The stock tub on the pick-up version gets a drop-in liner but there’s no power outlet or light that some of the competition offer. The tie-down points are also a bit disappointing with two lower points in the rear of the tub and a pair of higher points in the front. Experience tells us that high-mounted tie-down points are vastly less practical than anchor points mounted close to the cargo floor.

The move to the larger engine has, however, increased the Mazda’s towing ability. From the previous version’s 3000kg towing limit, the new 2.2 can now legally tow 3500kg (with a braked trailer and approved tow-hitch). Payloads vary according to specification, but range from about 1000kg right up to 1379kg for the XS singe-cab-chassis.

The factory-option drop-side tray carries it’s load up high, but offers a flat floor with no wheel-arch intrusions. The standard tub is not as large in any direction, but does have a damped tailgate for safety (you can’t drop it) and convenience (the gas struts help raise it).

In the cabin, you get USB charging ports (two in the front, one in the rear seat) and there are central air-vents for the rear seat of dual-cab models. The dual-cab also has an under-seat storage area, two gloveboxes and a 60/40 split fold rear bench. The doors feature bottle holders and there’s a flip-down glasses compartment in the roof lining.

While the front seats are comfy enough for bigger drivers, the rear seat also goes against dual-cab tradition a little by having plenty of room in every direction, as well as a rational seat-back angle.

While the XS remains the entry-level BT-50 variant, you once again have the choice of two or four-wheel drive, with price-tags to match. So, starting at the start, the 4x2 XS single-cab cab-chassis now kicks off at $37,900 before on-road costs with the dual-cab pick-up (styleside) 4x2 variant at $46,710.

Move up to all-wheel drive and there’s no single-cab option. Instead, things start with the dual-cab cab-chassis 4x4 at $53,120 and the dual-cab pick-up at $54,720.

Aside from the bigger engine and stronger performance, you now get an eight-speed transmission and there’s fuel-saving stop-start tech that was once only available on higher-spec BT-50s.

Other additions for the XS include LED headlights, adaptive cruise control, wireless connectivity for both Apple Car Play and Android Auto, a reversing camera and an 8.0-inch touchscreen. There’s also digital radio and hill-descent control.

But the XS’ place at the bottom of the BT-50 ladder is confirmed with the cloth-trimmed interior, vinyl flooring and plain steel wheels for all but the dual-cab pick-up 4X4 variant which gets alloy wheels.

Which is all fine and gives the Mazda something of a pointy stick with which to poke at the incoming competitors (mainly) from China, but where does that place the XS relative to the 3.0-litre BT-50? Well, if you take the XT variant with the 3.0L engine and the same body and driveline layout, the XS comes in at just $2500 less. That’s not a huge saving either as an outright number or in terms of the monthly lease repayments.

Part of that is because Mazda has also hiked prices across the BT-50 range in tandem with announcing the new XS. Which means that spec-for-spec 1.9 versus 2.2-litre XS is now $1500 more than it was. But even if Mazda had held prices on the XS variants, would $4000 be enough of a difference? For reference, the original XS sliced $3000 off the 3.0L price when it was launched back in late 2021.

There are areas where you can see where Mazda has pulled a few dollars out of the vehicle, starting inside with the small centre touchscreen, the truly tiny central dash-cluster screen, and the cloth trim. There’s also a bit of hard plastic in evidence and the air-conditioning lacks the set-and-forget function of climate control systems. The keyless entry and start has gone and the XS is started with an old fashioned ignition key. The XS specification also loses the front and rear parking sensors and the tyre-pressure monitoring system.

You might also imagine the drum rear brakes are another giveaway but, in fact, they’re standard across the whole BT-50 line-up.

Foton’s Aucan 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel meets Euro 6 emission standards using AdBlue and produces 120kW of power at 3600rpm and a meaty 450Nm of torque between 1500-2400rpm.

Its hybrid assistance follows convention with the turbo-diesel engine equipped with a belt-driven starter-generator paired with a compact 48-volt lithium-ion battery nestled behind the rear seat.

This combination provides not only smooth engine stop-start technology but also modest boosts in power and torque (in addition to the diesel’s 120kW/450Nm) to enhance engine response and load-hauling ability.

The ZF-designed eight-speed torque converter automatic offers the choice of manual sequential shifting using the steering wheel-mounted paddles, along with several drive modes. The V7-C is estimated to accelerate from 0-100km/h in less than 11 seconds with a top speed of around 160km/h.

Only thing missing is a locking differential, which for a 4x2 can be handy when accessing rugged worksites or pulling a boat trailer up a slimy boat-ramp.

The new engine capacity of 2.2 litres is up from the 1.9 of the previous XS version but still well short of the 3.0 litres of the more expensive BT-50 versions. And the specifications are pretty much exactly what you’d expect with the new 2.2 just about splitting the difference between the old 1.9 and the 3.0.

In this case, that equates to 120kW of power and 400Nm of torque, while the 1.9 was good for 110kW and 350Nm, and the 3.0 sports 140kW and 450Nm. So, yep, somewhere right about the middle. And that makes sense given the new 2.2 uses the basic mechanical architecture of the 1.9.

But the switch up to the new engine brings one very important change and that’s the adoption of an eight-speed automatic to replace the six-speed unit fitted to the previous XS and the other BT-50s. That has an obvious potential benefit for drivability, but also for fuel economy.

Mazda has also added stop-start tech to the XS in the name of efficiency. But, as we’ve found many times before, the fuel economy benefits seem restricted to the official test results rather than the real world where this technology serves to annoy many drivers more than anything else.

If you opt or the four-wheel-drive variants, you’ll get a rear diff lock but you miss out on an on-road 4x4 setting. Considering the 2.2-litre’s newfound towing capacity (the full 3500kg of the competition), that lack of a 4x4 Auto setting is a shame, but not an unexpected one at this price-point.

Foton claims official combined consumption of 8.0L/100km and the Tunland’s trip computer was showing 9.5 at the completion of our 294km test, which comprised our usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third was hauling more than one tonne of payload.

Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was even better at 9.2L/100km. That’s excellent sub-10L/100km economy for a vehicle weighing more than two tonnes being driven mostly on metro roads and consumption that's well within the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between manufacturer and real-world figures.

So, based on our test figure, you could expect a realistic driving range of more than 800km from its 76-litre diesel tank.

While one of the expected benefits of the 2.2-litre engine compared with the three-litre unit is a reduction in fuel consumption, the new 2.2 engine goes one big step further by actually being more frugal than the 1.9-litre engine it replaces. Well, in terms of the official government test, anyway.

The single cab-chassis model in new 2.2-litre, two-wheel-drive form posted a combined (urban-highway) fuel number of a creditable 6.9 litres per 100km. Compared with the mechanically similar 1.9 single cab-chassis, that’s a saving of 0.1 litres per kilometre, and a corresponding drop in tailpipe carbon emissions of 1 gram per kilometre.

To be honest, this small improvement is probably largely due to the stop-start system now fitted, which many drivers will turn off at the first opportunity. Even so, the new eight-speed transmission must also be playing a part, so let’s call the old and new engines line-ball in the real world.

The rest of the XS line-up scored official figures of 6.3 litres per 100km for the double-cab pick-up 4x2, 7.1 litres for the double cab-chassis 4x4 and 6.6 litres per 100km for the dual-cab pick-up 4x4.

With the BT-50’s standard 76-litre fuel tank, the theoretical range is more than 1000km. In reality, that’s going to be closer to 800km.

The BT-50 engines do not require AdBlue additive to reduce exhaust emissions.

There’s big assist handles on the A and B-pillars which combined with the side-steps makes for easy boarding into a spacious and comfortable driving position. However, some adjustments for base cushion rake and lumbar support would be welcome.

With selectable steering feel and drivetrain settings, it’s an enjoyable vehicle to drive. The turbo diesel has excellent all-round response, with the seamless interaction of its 48V mild-hybrid assist providing extra urge from standing starts.

Although you can manually shift, the eight-speed auto gets the best out of this engine in urban use, keeping it mostly within the 1500-2400rpm band where torque is at its strongest. We also sampled the Sport and Eco drive modes but found the default Standard setting was an ideal compromise. It’s also a relaxed highway cruiser requiring only 1800rpm to maintain 110km/h.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 830kg into the load tub, which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload exceeding one tonne (1010kg). The rear leaf springs compressed 75mm under this weight, leaving about 40mm of static bump-stop clearance which did not display any harsh bottoming-out on our test route.

It hauled this payload with commendable ease, particularly on our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h where it quickly downshifted to fourth gear and 2400rpm (the upper end of its peak torque band) to haul this load to the summit.

Engine-braking on the way down, in a manually selected second gear, was also robust for a relatively small engine displacement restraining more than three tonnes of combined vehicle and payload on overrun. It proved to be a competent heavy load-hauler.

Our only criticisms are that the eight-speed automatic tends to hold sixth gear for too long at times, with the engine sounding and feeling like it’s really labouring before downshifting to fifth.

There were also a few settings in the touchscreen’s ‘Rear Cross Traffic Assist’ menu that could not be selected and the ‘Traffic Sign Recognition’ symbol was not displayed in the driver’s instrument display. Inchcape could not confirm if these findings were unique to our test vehicle or a broader product issue.

Striking the right balance between ride comfort and load-lugging capacity has always been the big trick with utes in general. The fact is, there’s probably no ideal setting, especially considering the range of payloads a ute can be expected to carry on any particular day. In the BT-50’s case, Mazda has opted to go for a stiffer suspension tune. That means it can technically tow and haul with the best of them, but it also dictates that ride quality is far from what you’d call plush, even in this market segment.

The ute handles bumps best when the undulations don’t come too hot and fast. But strike a patch of high-frequency lumps and bumps and the suspension, particularly at the rear, starts to pogo about with a corresponding decline in ride control. The steering, too, seems to lack a little feel and is relatively slow-geared (although that has its benefits off-road).

The engine certainly does the job in isolation, but it’s likely to struggle a little with the full three-and-a-half tonnes on the hitch. It’s pretty noisy, too, and definitely sounds like a diesel, unlike some modern diesel designs that are more refined. There’s also a sense that Mazda has ditched some of the sound deadening of other BT-50 models, as the engine is certainly heard and felt. The optional snorkel moves the induction noise right into the driver’s window when it’s open, too.

But the new eight-speed automatic transmission is a beauty. Upshifts are crisp and smooth and even the downshifts as you approach a full stop are measured and calibrated to never intrude. And it’s nice to see a conventional T-bar shifter with no separate park button or non-intuitive movements required.

We didn’t get a chance to try the BT-50’s off-road chops, but past experience tells us that the Mazda will be pretty good. As with many four-wheel-drive utes, the limiting factor will be the standard tyres fitted at the factory.

While alloy wheels and carpets on the floor might be negotiable on a vehicle like this, a basic level of safety gear is not. So, the XS gets front, knee and side-curtain airbags, as well as givens such as anti-lock brakes and stability control.

But it doesn’t stop there with the BT-50 XS also fitted with the bulk of the current driver aids. Those include blind-spot monitoring, lane keeping assistance, lane-departure warning, rear cross-traffic alert and the reverse camera system. There’s also autonomous emergency braking which can also identify pedestrians and cyclists.

You also get Mazda’s own take on the controversial driver-attention monitor which many ute makers simply haven’t managed to get right in terms of the system’s calibration and how aggressively it acts. The BT-50’s is one of the less intrusive ones.

What’s missing? On a vehicle designed to tow big loads, a tyre pressure monitoring system is a great addition, but not one you’ll get on a BT-50 at this price. We’d also like to see an on-road 4WD setting which would allow the use of all-wheel drive when, say, towing on a bitumen road. More expensive competitors have this, but the Mazda is hardly alone in not offering this tech at this entry-level price.

The XS variant picks up the five-star ANCAP safety rating already awarded to the rest of the BT-50 line-up.

It's confidently backed by a seven-years/unlimited kilometre warranty and seven years of roadside assistance.

Scheduled servicing is every 15,000km/12 months whichever occurs first.

There’s capped pricing for the first seven scheduled services up to seven years/110,000km totalling $4492, or an average of around $640 per service.

Foton Australia currently has a national network of around 20 dealers (with plans to expand) represented in most states and territories. All can provide scheduled vehicle servicing.

Mazda’s standard five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty applies to the BT-50 range, and includes the first five years of roadside assistance, too.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. Capped-price servicing is available with the first five years of servicing costing $2188 on 4x2 versions and $2302 for 4x4 variants.

It’s worth mentioning that the BT-50’s new engine is Euro 5 compliant but doesn’t require AdBlue, reducing running costs.