Foton Tunland vs Nissan Navara

What's the difference?

In pure workhorse terms the V7-C 4x2 is the most impressive Chinese ute we’ve tested, with its ability to legally haul more than one tonne of payload while towing up to 3.5 tonnes of braked trailer unmatched by Chinese rivals (and most others). When you add purposeful styling, ample cabin space, generous appointments and a long warranty, all for less than $40K, the new Tunland model represents compelling value for money.

While it won’t appeal on the value front as much as its Mitsubishi Triton engineering twin, the Navara’s tweaks from Premcar make it a more comfortable and livable thing. 

The extra cost is worth it for how much better it is on the road, plus you get more features, regardless.

Whether the changes to the Navara are sexy enough to get people in the dealership door is another question, but anyone who takes this over a Triton won’t be disappointed.

If it's for work, the SL or ST will do. If it's doubling as a family car, the Pro-4X is worth the outlay.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

If Oscar Wilde was correct in claiming that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery then Ford and Ram should be blushing, judging by some of the Tunland’s styling cues which appear to draw strong design inspiration from Ford’s F-150 (V7) and Ram’s 1500 (V9).

Even so, our base model V7-C 4x2 does not look or feel like the afterthought that workhorse models can represent in commercial fleets. Its alloy wheels and splashes of bright body chrome combined with body-coloured doorhandles/mirror shells and a decorative tailgate looks more upmarket than you’d expect, particularly at this low price.

Riding on a long 3355mm wheelbase with external dimensions of 5617mm length, 2000mm width and 1910 height, its traditional body-on-frame design features twin wishbone front suspension, a leaf-spring live rear axle, electric power-assisted steering and four-wheel disc brakes.

And although it’s a 4x2 it shares many of its 4x4 siblings’ off-road credentials including a useful 240mm of ground clearance, 28 degrees approach/21 degrees ramp break-over/26 degrees departure angles, 700mm wading depth and 13.5-metre turning circle.

Its external dimensions create a spacious interior that nudges the benchmark for workhorse luxury. With Daimler truck DNA evident in its digital screen displays, the plush synthetic leather trim features a combination of quilted white stitching and contrasting red stitching, plus splashes of satin chrome and dark woodgrain highlights on the dash, centre console and door trims.

Nissan has done well to inject its own design flavour into the ute, because even though there’s inevitable similarity in the silhouette, it doesn’t just look like a Triton.

Impressive given a lot of the car is the same, and Nissan couldn’t change any of the hard points the Triton comes with. In fact, the Navara’s dimensions are largely the same as the Triton, coming in at 5320mm long, 1930mm wide and 1815mm tall.

The biggest Nissan-specific design element is a nod to the Navara’s heritage, the three little vent lines above the grille hark back to the original D21 generation ute which had these holes in the bonnet.

It’s subjective to some extent, but I reckon the Navara has the Triton beat on the design front.

Depending on the variant, you get some other indicators that this is no Triton, including a sports bar on the rear of the cabin with ‘Navara’ cut into it, or Pro-4X decals if that’s the variant you go for.

Given the lifestyle and off-road focus of the Pro-4X, it also has a bit more trim inside and out to feel more rugged and premium.

The Navara’s new interior is a big step up over the previous generation, even if it is genuinely all-Triton in there. The biggest change is the Nissan badge on the steering wheel.

It’s a ute, so there’s still a lot of plastic, cheap materials and even the nicer looking surfaces are in a few spots made of gloss black plastic (sometimes called piano black) which gets smudged easily and after a short while.

With its 2190kg kerb weight and 3305kg GVM, the V7-C 4x2 has a sizeable 1115kg payload rating which is the largest of the Tunland fleet.

It’s also rated to tow up to 3500kg of braked trailer and with its big 6805kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can tow its maximum trailer weight when carrying its maximum one-tonne-plus of payload. Those are impressive numbers unmatched by its Chinese rivals.

The load tub is protected by a spray-in liner and measures 1577mm long, 1650mm wide and 530mm deep, with 1240mm between the wheel housings ample for carrying Aussie or Euro pallets.

There’s also tailgate assist and load-anchorage points front and rear, but the front ones are mounted near the tops of the sidewalls which is not ideal for securing low loads. Anchorage points near floor level (like those at the rear) are best for securing loads of all heights.

There’s ample room in all key dimensions for the driver and front passenger, where storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door plus an overhead glasses holder and large glovebox.

A cleverly designed centre console offers two levels of storage, with dual USB-A ports and a 12v socket in the lower level. There’s also two bottle-holders in the centre and a large box at the back, with an internal A/C vent to keep contents cool and a padded lid that doubles as an elbow rest.

The rear doors open wide to allow easy access to a spacious rear bench seat, given I’m 186cm and have ample knee clearance and headroom when sitting behind the driver’s seat set in my position. There’s also a flat floor that saves central passengers from having to straddle a transmission hump but shoulder room for three big Aussies can be squeezy, which is okay for short trips but a limit of two would be ideal for longer journeys.

Rear passengers have access to adjustable air vents on the rear of the centre console, along with storage that includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door plus pockets on each front seat backrest. The centre seat’s backrest also folds forward to provide an armrest containing two cup-holders.

The 60/40-split base cushions can swing up and be stored vertically if more internal carrying space is required. And although there’s no dedicated under-seat storage compartments, there’s generous space for stowing soft items like sports bags, jackets etc.

It’s a bit of a shame the Navara doesn’t benefit from the changes Nissan has been making to its interior design and layout recently, because it leaves older Nissans in the dust, in terms of design and ergonomics.

But, the Mitsubishi Triton’s interior isn’t a bad one for the Navara to have inherited, because it just works. It’s uncomplicated and sensible, if a little boring.

There are physical buttons for shortcuts, and the tech is relatively straightforward, even if it does also carry the downside of Android Auto being wired-only. It adds to the somewhat dated feeling the Navara’s interior carries, but the physical space itself is rather sensible.

The Navara’s seats are comfortable, and as the driver it’s easy to find your own preferred position, with the electric adjustment in higher variants being an extra help there.

The driving ergonomics and visibility are also good, which lines up well with the Navara’s driving dynamics and makes it feel less like you’re pedalling a big dual-cab around.

Behind the driver, there’s not heaps in the way of amenity, but the addition of USB ports once you’re past the base SL is welcome for second-row passengers, and the space isn’t cramped by any means.

The Navara has a tub capable of easily fitting a Euro pallet, according to Nissan’s specs, but with its distance of 1135mm between wheel arches, it won’t fit an Aussie pallet. The tub is almost square, at 1555mm long and 1545mm wide, and 525mm tall. 

Plus there’s the 3500kg towing capacity and its payload ranging between 964kg for the Pro-4X or up to 1064kg in the base SL.

The new D27 generation Navara starts from $53,348, before on-road costs, so it’s already more expensive than the Triton it’s based on, but we’ll get into the main, somewhat oily reasons for that in a bit. 

The Navara’s available in four variants at launch, SL, ST, ST-X and Pro-4X. They’re all 4X4 dual-cabs, so it’s mainly the features for each trim level that make the difference when it comes to pricing.

The SL starts off with a lot of the basics covered. There are LED headlights and tail-lights, climate control, the same 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen as the rest of the range and digital radio as well as Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.

Its aforementioned touchscreen is also a little larger than the one in the Triton it’s based on. Then there’s the 7.0-inch driver display screen which lives between the two physical dials.

At this point in the range the steering wheel is polyurethane and the floors aren’t carpeted, just covered with vinyl. It’s a work ute and it feels like one.

Things pick up slightly with the ST, which starts from $56,765, and gains alloy wheels, auto-folding mirrors, a leather-accented steering wheel and floor carpet, plus now side-steps and a sports bar. It also adds USB ports in the second row for charging, so it’s probably the minimum grade you’d want if you’re ever going to have kids in the back. Essentially, it gains a few things that make it feel a little more livable without getting too fancy.

The ST-X is a fair step up in price, it’s $63,177, but gets better suspension, 18-inch alloys, leather-accented and heated front seats and a power adjustable driver's seat, dual-zone climate and a wireless phone charger.

It also gains a centre limited-slip differential, drive modes more compatible with off-roading, different styling elements and push-button start, so you don’t need to use the physical key.

The top-of-the-range (until the Warrior arrives) is the $68,418 Pro-4X with more design changes, all-terrain tyres, a black sports bar and roof rails, contrast stitching and specific seats with Pro-4X styling. It’s the variant Nissan Australia expects to be the most popular, too. It also has the same diff and better suspension the ST-X gains.

Foton’s Aucan 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel meets Euro 6 emission standards using AdBlue and produces 120kW of power at 3600rpm and a meaty 450Nm of torque between 1500-2400rpm.

Its hybrid assistance follows convention with the turbo-diesel engine equipped with a belt-driven starter-generator paired with a compact 48-volt lithium-ion battery nestled behind the rear seat.

This combination provides not only smooth engine stop-start technology but also modest boosts in power and torque (in addition to the diesel’s 120kW/450Nm) to enhance engine response and load-hauling ability.

The ZF-designed eight-speed torque converter automatic offers the choice of manual sequential shifting using the steering wheel-mounted paddles, along with several drive modes. The V7-C is estimated to accelerate from 0-100km/h in less than 11 seconds with a top speed of around 160km/h.

Only thing missing is a locking differential, which for a 4x2 can be handy when accessing rugged worksites or pulling a boat trailer up a slimy boat-ramp.

A 150kW/470Nm four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine lies under the bonnet, which falls a little short of some rivals, but isn’t glaringly weak.

Its power lines up with, for example, the Toyota HiLux, but torque falls short of its rival’s 500Nm. It’s the same story for the Ranger, though that ute slips a nose ahead with 4.0kW more than HiLux and Navara in its four-cylinder guise.

The Navara’s six-speed automatic transmission also sends that power and torque to all four wheels, though how exactly it gets there depends on the spec and whether you have a centre differential or not.

Foton claims official combined consumption of 8.0L/100km and the Tunland’s trip computer was showing 9.5 at the completion of our 294km test, which comprised our usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third was hauling more than one tonne of payload.

Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was even better at 9.2L/100km. That’s excellent sub-10L/100km economy for a vehicle weighing more than two tonnes being driven mostly on metro roads and consumption that's well within the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between manufacturer and real-world figures.

So, based on our test figure, you could expect a realistic driving range of more than 800km from its 76-litre diesel tank.

From the Navara’s 75L tank, a claimed 7.7L/100km is used on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle, though on the launch drive we saw the trip computer hovering around 9.0L/100km.

With a few hundred kilos in the tray, that jumped up to the low 11s.

Hypothetically, if you manage to get close to Nissan’s claimed consumption, you should be able to get more than 900km out of a single tank of diesel. Nissan’s claim isn’t too outrageous, either, considering the type of driving a car launch generally consists of isn’t normally conducive to favourable fuel consumption figures.

There’s big assist handles on the A and B-pillars which combined with the side-steps makes for easy boarding into a spacious and comfortable driving position. However, some adjustments for base cushion rake and lumbar support would be welcome.

With selectable steering feel and drivetrain settings, it’s an enjoyable vehicle to drive. The turbo diesel has excellent all-round response, with the seamless interaction of its 48V mild-hybrid assist providing extra urge from standing starts.

Although you can manually shift, the eight-speed auto gets the best out of this engine in urban use, keeping it mostly within the 1500-2400rpm band where torque is at its strongest. We also sampled the Sport and Eco drive modes but found the default Standard setting was an ideal compromise. It’s also a relaxed highway cruiser requiring only 1800rpm to maintain 110km/h.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 830kg into the load tub, which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload exceeding one tonne (1010kg). The rear leaf springs compressed 75mm under this weight, leaving about 40mm of static bump-stop clearance which did not display any harsh bottoming-out on our test route.

It hauled this payload with commendable ease, particularly on our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h where it quickly downshifted to fourth gear and 2400rpm (the upper end of its peak torque band) to haul this load to the summit.

Engine-braking on the way down, in a manually selected second gear, was also robust for a relatively small engine displacement restraining more than three tonnes of combined vehicle and payload on overrun. It proved to be a competent heavy load-hauler.

Our only criticisms are that the eight-speed automatic tends to hold sixth gear for too long at times, with the engine sounding and feeling like it’s really labouring before downshifting to fifth.

There were also a few settings in the touchscreen’s ‘Rear Cross Traffic Assist’ menu that could not be selected and the ‘Traffic Sign Recognition’ symbol was not displayed in the driver’s instrument display. Inchcape could not confirm if these findings were unique to our test vehicle or a broader product issue.

Now we get to the biggest reason you’d consider a Navara over the Triton it’s based on.

While the Navara benefits from having a relatively new platform underneath it - thanks Mitsubishi - it’s still a ladder-frame dual-cab ute so expectations weren’t exactly on the floor, but they also weren’t sky-high.

And sure, a lot of the details about the new Navara aren’t groundbreaking, nor is much of the way it drives - but the changes Premcar has made to the suspension in this ute are well worth the extra outlay.

What Premcar has done with the Navara, on what we would guess is a relatively constrained budget, is find the most cost-effective way to make the ute better to drive.

They went with upgraded dampers which have been tuned to balance control and comfort with the ute’s off-road ability.

The result? A very controlled front-end, more communicative steering and confidence on the road to drive over even rough surfaces without fear of being flung off the road. Ladder-frame utes don't normally feel so controlled over rough surfaces at high speeds.

It’s worth noting that while the SL and ST still benefit from the suspension upgrades, the ST-X and Pro-4X in particular are much better to drive than you’d expect from a dual-cab ute.

Some of the roads around Canberra are particularly rough, even close to town where the speeds are lower, but the Navara handled myriad surfaces and conditions on- and off-road, in the soaking wet and when it was bone-dry.

Aside from one particular section of the launch that may have just been a little unkind to the ‘stiffer’ sidewalls on the ST-X compared to the Pro-4X, the Navara’s behaviour was not only confidence-building, but allowed for a degree of fun not normally present in the class.

The steering feel left no guesswork necessary, and there’s not a huge on-centre dead-spot as is often the case in a dual-cab. Nice and direct without being too heavy.

The Navara’s weak point, which still gets a pass mark, is probably that its drivetrain now feels older than the ute in which it lives. The outputs are passable, and the transmission finds the correct place well enough, but in a world of 10-speed autos in Rangers or petrol plug-in hybrids, a bog-standard turbo-diesel with six gears has to be bang-on perfect to keep up. 

The Navara’s is adequate, but once you’re used to it, the drive experience is a step above most in the ute segment in terms of control, something that’s hard to come by in this segment.

It translates well to off-roading, where the ute’s front-end settles very quickly over ridges and undulating surfaces without the harshness of a too-stiff set of dampers.

Unsealed roads feel easily dispatched even at relatively high speeds, and with the right tyres (a la Pro-4X) the Navara is a seriously capable thing.

If you find yourself the owner of a D27 Navara and never leave the bitumen, you’re missing out.

The new Navara inherits the Triton’s maximum five-star ANCAP rating from testing in 2024. It scored notably well in Child Occupant protection, though its score for Safety Assist isn’t as high as some rivals.

Eight airbags mean the Navara’s got occupants cushioned in case of the worst, while the whole range has the same suite of safety tech, including a surround-view camera, forward collision warning and AEB, front- and rear-cross traffic alert, driver monitoring and traffic sign recognition, front and rear parking sensors and trailer sway control.

The Navara’s driver monitoring, however, suffers the same overzealousness as the Triton. Nissan didn’t reprogram any of the ADAS systems which means the car will regularly accuse you of being distracted if you’re not looking directly at the road ahead. Checking mirrors or a map in the centre screen will trigger this.

It's confidently backed by a seven-years/unlimited kilometre warranty and seven years of roadside assistance.

Scheduled servicing is every 15,000km/12 months whichever occurs first.

There’s capped pricing for the first seven scheduled services up to seven years/110,000km totalling $4492, or an average of around $640 per service.

Foton Australia currently has a national network of around 20 dealers (with plans to expand) represented in most states and territories. All can provide scheduled vehicle servicing.

Nissan’s 10-year/300,000km warranty is fantastic but applies only if you service with Nissan. It’s five years with no kilometre limit otherwise. 

There’s five years' of flat-price servicing at $499 per visit, every 12-months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.

Roadside assist is also free for a decade if you service with Nissan, or a year otherwise.

Given there are around 180 Nissan dealers nationwide, finding one shouldn’t be a challenge.