EV Reviews

I don’t think I’ve ever been able to say this about a car before, but I can pretty much guarantee that at some point in the not-too-distant future, you will find yourself sitting in this new Tesla Model 3, whether you want to or not. Just not necessarily in the driver’s seat. This is the Tesla Model 3 Rear-Wheel Drive, the brand’s newest model and one that arrived after the existing range was stamped with a new 'Premium' tag, opening the door for this entry-level model to sit below. Tesla says this is what its version of affordability looks like, and that it expects this model to be a runaway hit with rideshare drivers – which is why you’ll definitely be sitting in one at some point – given it undercuts even its Chinese competition with a sharp $45,900 price tag, before on-road costs. For the record, the next cheapest model in the Tesla family is the Model 3 Premium, which starts $9.0K above this model, at $54,900. That is a sizeable saving. And it’s cheaper than the BYD Seal Dynamic ($49,888), Kia EV4 ($50,040) and Mazda 6e ($49,990). Before we get to all the driving stuff, let’s cover just how Tesla was able to shave the better part of 10 grand off its cheapest model, especially given — from the outside, at least — this still very much looks like a Model 3. Step one is the tyres, with the Hankooks or Michelins usually preferred by Tesla swapped out for cheaper Giti rubber, which comes from China. The 18-inch wheels themselves now wear new black aero covers. But that’s the only sizeable change outside, with the Model 3 still sporting a glass roof and LED lighting. Inside, though, the changes are more noticeable. The seats front and back are now mostly cloth (though they’re still heated up front), and the screen for rear-seat riders has been deleted. There are no floor mats included, and the door trims are a harder plastic. There’s also no cabin ambient interior lighting, with interior lights confined to the footwell, and there are now only seven speakers. Perhaps the weirdest delete, though, is the electric seat controls, which are usually knobs attached to the lower left- or right-hand side of each front seat. The seats are still electric, only now they’re controlled through the central screen. Deleting the plastic knobs must have saved Tesla about 80 cents. But it all adds up, I guess. Like other Teslas, there’s a five-year unlimited-kilometre warranty on the vehicle itself, while the battery is covered for eight years or 160,000km. And Tesla has joined the V2L (Vehicle-to-Load) party with what the brand calls Power Share, which means you can plug in to the vehicle’s battery to run or power up your devices. You will need an adaptor, though. Finally, it also shares the rest of the range’s maximum five-star ANCAP rating. Would you pay $9.0K for better seats, more speakers, more interior lighting and a rear screen for the kids? I know I wouldn’t. Tesla is annoyingly mysterious when it comes to the technical specification of its vehicles. I don’t know of any other brands that will take your money but won’t tell you what you’re actually buying. But there is some crucial stuff we do know. This Model 3 will travel an impressive 572km between charges, and will reportedly clip 100km in 6.2 seconds on its way to a licence-shredding top speed of 201km/h. That’s more than 50km in extra range than you get in the more expensive Premium version, but down on the huge 750km range offered in the Model 3 Long Range. Apart from that, we think it's single electric motor makes up to 208kW, and that the battery on board is a 63kWh Lithium-Ferro-Phosphate (LFP) unit. Charging is thought to be up to 130kW DC. Like the new Model Y, Tesla has largely fixed the annoyances that plagued earlier versions of the Model 3, namely too-sharp steering and a too-harsh ride. But before we get to that, there is something refreshingly seamless about the way this Model 3 operates. Not all of its tech is unique, but the way it operates without making you want to strangle whoever designed it increasingly is. Lots of brands offer mobile-phone keys and get-in-and-go access, for example, but Tesla’s is seamless. The credit-card key access is clunky — often requiring several goes on the sensor before the door unlocks — but approach with your phone in your pocket and you’re in and moving without any delay. I’m even getting used to the digital gear selector, which now lives on the 16-inch central screen. You swipe forwards for Drive, backwards for Reverse, and tap for Park, but the Model 3 can also predict the gear you need based on your steering inputs. So, if you’re reversing with the wheel locked left, for example, then turn the wheel to the right, it assumes you want to move forwards and will automatically select Drive for you. I hated it at first, but now it’s weirdly intuitive. Less helpful is having to access the screen to activate everyday driving functions like with windscreen wipers. A minimalist interior is fine, but not if it makes the drive experience more annoying. Elsewhere, though, the Model 3 is easy and familiar. The steering is direct but doesn’t feel darty or overreactive, and the ride on its 18-inch alloy wheels is pretty good on all but the dodgiest of Sydney road surfaces. You never feel like you’re sitting on top of, rather than in, the Model 3, which is a good thing. Nor does the damping give you that kind of soft, bouncy and busy ride you can find in some newcomer EVs. That is, of course, if you choose to drive it at all. This cheapest of Model 3s can be had with Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) for an extra $149 per month. This is the new V14 version, too, which is the first that I’ve really liked.  Whether this is the Model 3 for you or not all boils down to how much you enjoy the finer things in life. But buy it or not, you will be riding in one at some point. I can see Australia's ride-share fleet booming with these cut-price EVs in the very near future.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB is back for its second generation and this time it’s available with either a mild-hybrid or battery electric powertrain. It’s also packed with new tech. Is the EV the pick of the line-up?

As the old children’s story told us - slow and steady wins the race. If the likes of BYD, Chery and GWM are the Hare, Geely may end up being the automotive equivalent of the Tortoise. Now in its second year in the Australian market, the brand has expanded deliberately slowly. It started with the EX5 electric mid-size SUV, added the similar-sized Starray plug-in hybrid (or Super Hybrid as they like to call it) and then earlier this year the smaller EX2 electric SUV. Now comes its latest addition, the Starray all-wheel drive (AWD), which joins the existing front-wheel drive offerings. There’s only a single, high-grade variant of the AWD model available, the Inspire. It’s priced from $44,990, before on-road costs, and features the same equipment as the Inspire front-wheel drive that starts at $41,490 (while the Complete FWD still kicks-off the range at $37,490). Standard equipment includes: LED headlights and tail-lights 19-inch alloys Keyless entry and ignition Panoramic sunroof Power tailgate Power-adjustable front seats with heating A 15.4-inch multimedia touchscreen  Ambient interior lighting A 16-speaker, 1000-watt premium sound system   In terms of design, there isn’t anything noticeably different about this new AWD model, with the same inoffensive exterior and functional cabin. But what it lacks in design flair, inside and out, it compensates for with space.  For this size of SUV the Starray is roomy, especially in the second row, so it makes it a genuine family car option in this mid-size SUV segment. As for cargo space, the main boot area remains 428 litres, however with the introduction of the rear-mounted electric motor, this AWD variant has 72L less underfloor storage than the FWD models. That rear motor adds not only all-wheel drive but also more performance. Power is up 80kW (to 220kW) and torque is up 150Nm (to 412Nm), so there is notably more punch when you put your foot down. Unfortunately, while there is a new multi-link rear suspension set-up, Geely continues to stick with the more European-orientated tuning for the ride and handling. While it’s better than the usual softly sprung approach for the Chinese domestic market, the firmer Euro-spec doesn’t suit Australia’s patchwork roads. The ride can sometimes feel too ‘floaty’, lacking composure and control, while at other times it can feel too firm and hit bumps harshly.  Then there’s the steering, which is too light and vague most of the time, then hyperactive when the lane keeping assistance is activated. Obviously a mid-size SUV like this doesn’t need steering dynamically-tuned for spirited driving, but it shouldn’t feel this numb when you’re on the move. But Geely Australia management is adamant local ride and handling tuning is not on the agenda, at least any time soon, despite other Chinese brands (most notably GWM) investing heavily in the practice. Instead, the brand says it can call on experience from other brands Geely owns, such as Lotus, but it’s not clear exactly what involvement those engineers have or can have on any upcoming Geely models. The same need for improvement can be said for the active safety features, which require further development and tuning to make them more seamlessly integrated into the driving experience. As it stands, the Starray offers up a steady stream of beeps, bongs and other alerts when it feels things aren't in order. The lane keeping assistance is perhaps the most irritating, as it struggles to maintain any consistent path in the lane. So as much as the steering can feel numb, when you activate the adaptive cruise control, lane keeping starts as well and the steering wheel begins to tug in your hand as it wanders around the lane. So, if Geely does get the Lotus engineers to help with the handling, perhaps Geely-owned Volvo could lend its expertise to the safety calibration and integration. But while it may have its weaknesses, where the Starray will impress buyers is in their hip pocket. Not only is it amongst the more affordable mid-size SUVs, hybrid or otherwise, with a 29.8kWh battery and a 60L fuel tank it has a claimed EV range of 130km and a combined range of 1065km - with a claimed fuel economy figure of just 1.7L/100km. Of course, achieving that figure in the real-world and not the test cycle is almost-impossible, but still you should expect to see good returns, below 4.0L/100km if you drive in the urban setting. Our test drive took us three hours south of Sydney and we managed to get approximately two hours of that drive done on EV power before it ran out. Once it was depleted, the petrol engine had to do most of the work and after some twisty roads up and down some mountains, we saw a relatively-high return of just over 5.0L/100km. Given most buyers will spend time in the city and suburbs, it’s unfair to judge the fuel economy on a single open road drive, so instead we’ll reserve final judgement until a more representative test. But its efficiency, and ability to run on electric power alone, will no doubt be a major selling point for the Starray and help Geely continue its slow climb up the sales charts. As many Australians feel on-going financial pressure and look to save on their weekly budget, a cheaper up-front price coupled with (theoretical) lower running costs, particularly on fuel, the Starray will look very attractive.

The Mazda CX-6e Azami tops the electric SUV range in Australia, listing at $56,990. That’s only three grand more than the GT($53,990), but that’s because you don’t get a whole bunch more stuff. Both models get the following as standard: LED lights Panoramic glass roof Black Maztech trim Heated and ventilated front seats A massive 26.45-inch multimedia screen Head-up display Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto 21-speaker stereo You do get bigger 21-inch alloys on the Azami, which we like, and digital wing mirrors, which we don’t, so we think the cheaper GT is the better bang-for-bucks purchase here.   There’s a single motor at the rear axle, making 190kW and 290Nm, while its 78kWh LFP battery, producing a WLTP driving range of up to 484kms. The CX-6e is covered by Mazda’s five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, which is a little underwhelming by today’s standards, though the battery is covered for eight years or 160,000kms.

The Skoda Epiq is a new entry EV that will join the compact Elroq and mid-size Enyaq SUVs from the middle of next year, with pricing estimated to inhabit the space between $35,000-$40,000. Developed alongside the Cupra Raval, Volkswagen I.D Polo and ID. Cross, the Epiq has more in common with the small VW SUV, although all four share the MEB Entry platform and come with the same battery and powertrain tech. We got some time behind the wheel at compact SUV's global launch to see how it will fit into Australia's ever-growing EV landscape. In Europe, the Skoda Epiq comes in three flavours – the Epiq 35, Epiq 40 and flagship Epiq 55. The base Epiq 35 and mid-spec 40 come with a smaller 37kWh lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery that is combined with either an 85kW (35) or 99kW (40) e-motor driving the front wheels, each producing an identical 267Nm of torque. The lower-powered Skoda hatch accelerates from 0-100km/h in 11 seconds, with the Epiq 40 carving a second off the same sprint (9.8 seconds). For those who need more performance, the Epiq 55 obliges with the combination of a bigger 52kWh nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) battery and a punchier front electric motor that pushes out 155kW and a more muscular 290Nm of torque for a brisk 0-100km/h dash of 7.1 seconds. Whichever Skoda Epiq you choose, the small SUV comes with remarkable efficiency for an EV, with either version capable of averaging around 13kWh/100km. That means the Epiq 35 and 40 with the LFP battery can drive up to 310km on a charge, while the Epiq 55 with the NMC powerpack travels up to 441km, bettering the BYD Atto 2 with the longest range (430km), despite having a significantly smaller battery (52kWh vs 65kWh). Slashing real-world energy consumption is the heavily revised MEB Entry platform that has been redesigned to save weight, with even the flagship version tipping the scales at 1544kg, which isn't bad for an EV. A BYD Atto 2 with the bigger battery fitted weighs 176kg more. Helping it slip through the air easily, the Epiq also comes with some trick aero tech that slashes its drag coefficient to 0.275. Achieving that figure for an upright SUV wasn't easy and needed active air shutters behind the front bumper that only open when the battery needs cool air. Other additions include a set of wind-cheating wheels and a pair of air curtains that channel air through the bumper and around the front wheels. An optimised flat underfloor that leads air to a rear diffuser, plus a rear tailgate spoiler and tail-lights and wheel-arch cladding's that have all been fine-tuned in the wind tunnel complete the extensive aero tweaks. Choose the most basic Skoda Epiq 35 and DC charging is capped at just 50kW, which isn't the best for how long you'll be hanging around a fast-charge, with the benchmark 10 to 80 per cent top-up taking 33 minutes. A better bet is paying more for the Epiq 40 that can accept a 90kW charge for a quicker 25-minute recharge. The Epiq 55, meanwhile, thanks to its different chemistry, can be charged at up to 105kW for the quickest 24-minute 10 to 80 per cent refill. Using the standard 11kW AC charger a 10-100 per cent top-up takes four hours for the entry and mid-spec Epiq and around 5.5 hours for the Epiq 55. While its sister car, the Cupra Raval hatch, stuns you with its design, the Epiq wins you over with its classy cabin that mixes high-quality materials with loads of space and slick, intuitive tech. Even though it's not as big as some of its rivals at 4171mm long, 1798mm wide and 1581mm tall, the Epiq's designers have managed to squeeze in generous rear head- and legroom, plus a huge 475-litre boot. If that's not enough those seats drop to provide up to 1345 litres of space, while under the bonnet lurks a 25-litre capacity storage bay to swallow all the cables. Despite being an entry Skoda, you'll still find an umbrella stashed in the door and an ice scarper in the boot, but it's the cabin's general look and feel that edges it over all its rivals. The large 13-inch Android-powered touchscreen is also intuitive and easy to use and even comes with a clear 5.3-inch digital instrument cluster. As well as proper buttons on the multi-function steering wheel, there's also a row of useful physical buttons below the centre console's vents. A large, central under-armrest bin, capacious door pockets and useful cupholders cement a deeply impressive cabin. Developed by a team of Cupra engineers sharing all the same parts bin items as the sporty Raval, it might be tempting to think the Skoda Epiq should drive like the little Spaniard that blurs the boundary between an EV and a hot hatch. Instead, the Epiq feels more grown up – not that it isn't an engaging steer, it's just the MacPherson struts up front and the torsion bar rear axle have been set up with a clear comfort bias, rather than outright thrills. The steering is precise and the ride remains smooth and controlled. Over some really challenging, bumpy roads you occasionally wish for some more pliancy from the dampers, but adaptive dampers are not an option, and our car rode on large 20-inch wheels, with the expectation things will improve on smaller rims. What was unexpected is how quiet and refined the Epiq is, giving the impression of a bigger, more expensive car. Behind the wheel, drivers can alter the amount of brake regeneration using a pair of steering wheel-mounted paddles that provide a one-pedal mode. It's also worth mentioning that, unlike many rivals in the class, all the driver assist tech seemed to work unobtrusively on the European roads, while the in-car tech is intuitive, clear and easy to use on the move. We've already mentioned the Skoda Epiq isn't as entertaining behind the wheel as a Cupra Raval, and some Australians might feel the entry models with a 310km range won't be enough. There's also a fear Skoda Australia might deny us both the Epiq 35 and 40 Down Under and only bring the flagship Epiq 55. If it does, the Skoda is likely to be priced well above $40,000, where the small entry EV will butt heads with the larger Skoda Elroq (from $48,990) and then start to look very expensive beside the bigger, more spacious, faster-charging BYD Atto 3 Evo. Since it's too early for prices and full specifications, we're forced to look at what's happened with the Skoda Epiq in Europe where the small all-electric EV is available in three different trims. Choose the Epiq and there are six different paint options. Standard on the Skoda Epiq are: 18-inch alloy wheels Multifunction steering wheel Black roof rails Ambient lighting Climate control Manual height-adjustable front seats 13-inch multimedia system 5.3-inch digital instrument cluster Variable boot floor LED tail-lights Rear parking sensors Mid-spec models in Europe add: Heated front and rear seats Digital key Reversing camera Privacy glass High-grade variants get: 20-inch alloy wheels Orange mirrors, window trim and seatbelts Three-spoke sports steering wheel with paddles for brake regen Contrasting black roof Options on the entry and mid-spec models include large 19-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights, a full-width panoramic roof and an electrically retractable tow bar (the Epiq can tug up to 1200kg braked). The Skoda Epiq has yet to undergo crash tests by either Euro NCAP or ANCAP but, when it does, expect it to be awarded the full five stars for protection. Standard safety kit includes: AEB, adaptive cruise Lane-keep assist Blind-spot monitoring Front and rear cross-traffic alert Traffic sign recognition Predictive speed sensor Exit warning Like any other Skoda, the all-new Epiq arrives with a comprehensive seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, with eight-year/160,000km protection for the high-voltage battery, plus a further 24 months roadside assistance. The expected service interval for the Epiq should be every 24 months/30,000km, whichever comes earlier. Like the bigger Elroq, the new entry Skoda EV will come with either a pay-as-you-go fixed price servicing, or the option of pre-paid eight- and 10-year service packs for an additional cost on purchase.

If you’re on the hunt for a spacious, family friendly SUV, you’ve never been more spoiled for choice. You can now pick big SUVs in all sorts of formats. Five seats, seven seats, petrol, diesel, electric, hybrid. There’s so much choice it can be overwhelming. This car, which I have for my next long-term test, is Volkswagen’s new Tayron. It replaces the Tiguan Allspace, but follows the same formula, effectively being a stretched Tiguan allowing space for a third row of seating. Only, this one doesn’t get three rows of seating, trading it away to facilitate large plug-in hybrid (PHEV) batteries under the floor. It’s an SUV that asks - do you prefer your extended family or kid’s friends over 100km of electric driving range and glorious boot space? Is it worth the trade? I’ve been finding out. I'm testing the Elegance, which is the more affordable of the two plug-in hybrid grades. Its priced at $62,390 before on-road costs. It sounds like good value when you compare it to the equivalent combustion version, which is only $2000 less at $60,390, but the eHybrid loses both the third row of seating and all-wheel drive traction in favour of its electric driving range. On that topic, the eHybrid version comes with a 19.7kWh battery pack granting it a 116km driving range (WLTP), but more on that later. Not so long ago, only plug-in hybrids from China would offer that kind of electric driving range at this price, so the Tayron highlights how competitive the market is. This is especially true when you consider it against its natural rival, the Kia Sorento, which, in its most affordable plug-in hybrid form is $71,175 before on-roads. However, it keeps all-wheel drive and its third seating row. Another key rival is the BYD Sealion 8 Dynamic AWD, from $63,990 (BOC), another three-row SUV. Other rivals like the Hyundai Santa Fe and Toyota Kluger are only available as plugless hybrids in Australia, but other competitors are more affordable like the Chery Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid (FWD - $45,990 drive-away) and Jaecoo J8 (AWD - $59,990 BOC). This version sits in middle of the Tayron line-up, bringing with it highlights including 19-inch wheels (with efficient Hankook Ventus Evo tyres), synthetic leather interior trim with power adjust for the driver and front passenger, memory settings, as well as heating, ventilation, and even massage settings, which is already a solid level of inclusions. However, our car also has the ‘Sound and Vision’ pack ($4200) which adds upgraded Matrix headlights and animated rear light clusters, an even larger multimedia touchscreen (from 12.9-inch to 15.0-inches), a premium audio system and a sportier steering tune. But wait, our car also has the panoramic sunroof, which adds another $2100 to the price. That brings the total for ours to $69,690, which is approaching premium territory.  You don’t want for cabin luxuries at all though, and it comes with the usual air of Volkswagen refinement. While you can probably live without all-wheel drive, missing out on the extra seating changes the value dynamic. Then again, losing them brings massive benefits, making this version of the car one of the more practical choices in the segment.  One such benefit is the enormous 705-litre boot which makes our largest CarsGuide case look tiny. The sheer volume of space here makes it a really clever family hauler, because you could fit a pram and loads of luggage without issue, but in some other mid-to-large SUVs that might be a squeeze. There is also a ridiculous amount of room for passengers in the second row. There's heaps of airspace between my knees and the back of the front seat set to my driving position. I’m 182cm tall, for reference. It has some clever additions like window shades built into the rear doors, dual USB-C outlets, and rear heated seats with a rear climate zone. It does all of this while being as narrow as a regular mid-size SUV (1866mm), unlike the now-discontinued Touareg or a size-up rival like the Hyundai Palisade, both of which are more than 100mm wider. This pays dividends when it comes time to park it in a tight city or unit-sized parking spot. In the cockpit, storage is solid, but there are also annoyances. I like the huge door storage which is carpeted, so things don’t rattle around. I also like the versatile centre console trench. This is a single area that extends under the armrest console, and features a removable dual cup holder with spring loaded edges, and a single divider piece you can slot in where you please. This is an excellent use of space. In addition, the centre console area is well utilised, with dual wireless phone chargers covered by a flip-open shelf for additional storage. It’s even rubberised, so objects don’t slide around on it, and the phone chargers are partitioned so they also can’t slide around. This is a lot better than the new Toyota RAV4, which also has a lot of storage, but some of it is tightly packaged. Physical buttons also make a return to the steering wheel, with VW hearing loud and clear that owners didn’t like the weird haptic controls from some new-gen cars. Sadly, this doesn’t extend to the touchscreen. The optional screen in this version is enormous, almost comically large for the space it takes up, and, frustratingly, it doesn’t feature physical switchgear for the climate controls. There is a single multi-function dial on the centre console, which can be used to adjust volume or drive mode by default, but you can add other settings in the somewhat convoluted menu system for themes. For a while I’ve heard that this Volkswagen multimedia system can be prone to glitches, but in the past I’ve only experienced minor ones. However, the day I picked this car up, I experienced a doozy. It was an unseasonably hot day, and I figured I’d crank the air conditioning. Easy, right? Just hit auto on the touchscreen and away you go. Wrong. The car started blowing warm air on to me. I figured the AC wasn’t actually in the correct mode, so I used the touchscreen-based menu to try and figure out what was going on, and despite pressing a whole bunch of settings (MAX mode, full fan speed, auto on/off, minimum temperature) nothing happened. I gave up, assuming the air conditioning was glitching, only for it to spring to life a full five or so minutes later and blast me with the cold air I had asked for earlier. Very strange. I have other gripes with this system, too. Not only does it feel unsafe jabbing my way through an unfamiliar menu while trying to drive, but even things as basic as switching back to Apple CarPlay can be annoying. The shortcut is in a tiny system tray at the top, and jabbing at it while you’re driving isn’t easy. Then there's the collection of confusing sub-menus for various functions. I find the theme setting particularly fiddly. Thankfully, Volkswagen’s excellent digital dash continues to be a highlight. It’s fast, customisable, and shows the correct information in style. The touchscreen really tarnishes an otherwise lovely Volkswagen cabin experience. It feels like the brand has taken the wrong lessons from user experience design from Tesla and Chinese rivals. I have decided to run a bit of an experiment on this car given I have it for a longer period. Picking it up with a full charge and full tank of fuel, I decided to see how much combined range it gets in two circumstances - if you simply run it in electric mode then use the engine, then, once refuelled and recharged, when purely using hybrid mode instead. I’m curious to see which setting will yield more range, if any. Regardless, running it in pure electric mode has yielded some pretty solid results. I ran the battery down until the engine was forced to turn on, which happened at exactly 100km according to the odometer. That’s a good result, considering the official WLTP figure is 116km and my drive included a freeway stint, which isn't the most efficient way to use the electric motor. With a full tank now near-depleted in my first month with the car, total range for EV + hybrid comes in at around 700km. Keep in mind, the hybrid has a smaller 45-litre fuel tank compared to the combustion version’s 58-litre tank. Once the battery had drained to the reserve level, the Tayron also remained reasonably fuel efficient considering the extra hardware it drags around. For the month, mine has produced a figure of 5.4L/100km. So while it might not be the best value plug-in hybrid mid-sizer out there, it features tech from this generation of vehicles, with an appropriate electric driving range and decent fuel consumption, even with the battery drained. Stay tuned for the next chapter where I’ll delve a bit more into the Tayron’s driving characteristics, the kinds of lifestyles it might best suit, the kind of people who shouldn’t buy one, and the results from my EV mode vs hybrid mode test. Acquired: August 2026 Distance travelled this chapter: 588km Odometer: 1275km Average fuel consumption this chapter: 5.4L/100km

The Mazda CX-6e range opens with the GT, which lists at $53,990 before on-road costs, and is — in our opinion — the pick of the two-grade line-up. That’s because, aside from bigger alloys and annoying digital wing mirrors, it gets the same and pretty generous equipment as the flagship Azami. That includes things like: 19-inch alloys LED lights Panoramic glass roof Black Maztech trim Heated and ventilated front seats A massive 26.45-inch multimedia screen Head-up display Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto 21-speaker stereo There’s a single motor at the rear axle, making 190kW and 290Nm, while its 78kWh LFP battery, producing a WLTP driving range of up to 484kms.

The CX-6e is the second model to arrive in the Mazda's recent EV push, and it gives the brand a model to go head to head with top-selling EVs like the Tesla Model Y and the Zeekr 7X. And, like both those rivals, the CX-6e is produced in China, through Mazda's partnership with Changan. We put it to the test at is Australian launch to see how it measures up.

It may look like the old one but this new BYD Atto 3 Evo is a very different proposition. The company has given its popular mid-size SUV a major upgrade, introducing an all-new, rear-wheel drive option for the first time. So how does this new version stack up? We put it through its paces to find out if the unseen changes make up for the lack of new looks.

BYD clearly has no plans on settling for second-best. The fast-rising Chinese brand looks set to finish 2026 as the closest rival to Toyota. And now, hot on the heels of announcing the cheapest electric vehicle in the country, it has now added the most-affordable plug-in hybrid, too. The Atto 2 DM-i is the newest addition as the brand looks to expand its range in Australia. In theory it ticks a lot of boxes, too. It gives buyers looking for cheaper running costs a new option. It should appeal to those looking to electrify but not ready for the all-electric switch. And, it’s also just an affordable small SUV, regardless of what’s under the bonnet.  So, does it actually tick those boxes? Well, let’s start with the question of value, and the Atto 2 DM-i makes a strong opening statement. There are two models to choose from and both start under $30,000.  The Essential kicks off the line-up at just $24,990, before on-road costs, which is cheaper than the Chery 5 hybrid (from $31,990), GWM Haval Jolion hybrid (from $32,990) and is even cheaper than the petrol-powered Hyundai Kona (from $33,700). Even the better-equipped Premium starts at just $29,990, before on-roads, which is an impressive number for a hybrid, let alone a plug-in hybrid. Especially when the Atto 2 EV is priced from an already appealing $31,990 for the Dynamic and $35,990 for the Premium. Despite its modest price the Essential still comes equipped with: 360-degree view parking cameras Adaptive cruise control Traffic sign recognition Forward collision warning Rear collision warning  Rear cross-traffic alert LED headlights  Keyless entry and ignition Four-speaker sound system 10.1-inch multimedia touchscreen Wireless Android Auto and Apple Car Play Premium adds: Vehicle-to-load (V2L) 50W wireless smartphone charger 12.8-inch multimedia touchscreen Eight-speaker sound system Panoramic sunroof Synthetic leather seats Ambient lighting Obviously the key difference between the Atto 2 models is the powertrain. The DM-i uses a 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine paired with an electric motor that makes a combined 122kW in the Essential and 156kW in the Premium. Both are equipped with BYD’s trademark Blade battery with lithium iron phosphate (LFP) chemistry. The Essential has a 7.85kWh battery that provides 39km of EV range and a claimed fuel economy return of just 1.0L/100km. The Premium gets a much larger 18.03kWh battery, which means a 90km EV range, and a claimed fuel economy figure of 0.7L/100km. Obviously that is a very impressive and attention-grabbing figure but like all plug-in hybrids, the published economy is a best-case-scenario, so don’t expect to see 1.0L/100km or less in the real-world. Our test drive was predominantly on open roads, so it wasn’t representative of what you’ll likely find in a predominantly urban environment, which is where a PHEV shines. So we’ll reserve our judgement on the efficiency of the Atto 2 DM-i until a later date. What our test drive did clearly demonstrate is that the Atto 2 is a well-built car. It may not be particularly quick, but it’s not weak either, comfortably cruising at 80km/h and faster on the open road.  It also did a nice job when the going got twisty. Again, measuring it against its mainstream and affordable peers rather than any dynamic benchmark, the Atto 2 DM-i felt solid and predictable on the road. The ride was respectable and soaked up bigger bumpers with relative ease, which is commendable on such an affordable car. One issue this reviewer had whilst driving was the seating position, which reminded me of my 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. By that I mean I wasn’t able to find a comfortable position as the pedals felt too close and I couldn’t get the steering wheel close enough. That may be a specific issue for taller drivers, but driving comfort is important for anyone who tries it on for size. Fortunately there is plenty of space for other things, including a claimed 20 in-cabin storage spots and a new, larger boot. It now measures 425L, which is 45L more than the electric Atto 2.  It may be a cheap car, but BYD has included all the safety features you should reasonably expect in any modern car. That includes the previously listed technology including forward and rear collision alert and similar smart safety assists, so BYD should be commended for not cutting corners. However, it must be noted ANCAP has not tested the Atto 2 independently yet. As for its ownership credentials, BYD offers a six-year/150,00km warranty, which is only average in this age of seven years (or more) and unlimited kays coverage from many of the big name brands.