Ford Ranger vs Cupra Terramar

What's the difference?

Ford has hit a sweet-spot with the Ranger PHEV XLT, as it can tow up to 3.5 tonnes of braked trailer, carry almost one tonne of payload and serve as a powered site anywhere you need to work or explore. Overall, it’s a well-engineered, practical and versatile all-terrain workhorse that’s as well suited to the needs of tradies and farmers as it is to adventurers.

Creating a model-shared product that’s selling into a hotly contested – and crowded – marketplace is a great way to wind up with something derivative and easily overlooked. But Cupra seems to have managed to avoid that with an end result that is distinctive and has its own character within the VW family. In top-shelf VZ form, the Terramar is an entertaining drive and there’s enough driver involvement for it to be short-listed by anybody who values the journey as much as the destination.

The less powerful entry-level S version, meantime, can’t call on the services of that fabulous 2.0-litre engine and, instead, will possibly have a harder job convincing the masses of its worthiness. The lack of all-wheel drive probably won’t count for as much as the 'missing' 85kW (compared with the VZ) and some would-be buyers might find it hard to reconcile a driver’s SUV with the smaller engine in the S. Inside either variant, though, it’s prime family real estate with the clever rear seating and plenty of space and light inside. The value for money equation is pretty handy, too.

But for all that, you get the sense Cupra will need to shout about the Terramar if it’s to be heard over the general din of this fierce market segment. It would be a real shame if this car became simply a part of that background noise.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with accommodation and meals provided.

At first glance most would struggle to pick the subtle visual differences between a Ranger PHEV XLT and a turbo-diesel equivalent. These include discreet ‘PHEV’ chrome garnishes on the front fenders and an additional spring-loaded flap on the passenger side to access the traction battery's charging port.

It also has unique wheel designs which are wider than those fitted as standard to diesel variants, which along with new lip mouldings and bespoke tyres have been developed to carry the higher loads of the hybrid powertrain while maintaining payload, towing and handling ability.

The only potential negative for tradies is that the Ranger PHEV is not available in cab-chassis form and the standard load tub cannot be replaced by an aftermarket tray or service body, given the hybrid drivetrain’s traction battery and Pro Power Onboard systems are fully integrated in its design.

Depending on which angle you’re looking from, the Terramar has elements of the VW Tiguan and Porsche Macan in the way it sits on the road and in the metal shapes that make up the whole. Interestingly, though, it’s probably genetically closest to the new Audi Q3 alongside which it’s built in Hungary, although there is plenty of new Tiguan in the platform and engineering aspects.

The highlights remain the nth-degree detailing that every current-model Cupra displays, combined with a sensible, practical layout. The detailing extends to what Cupra calls parametric design which, for those with their nerd on, refers to the way the little shapes moulded into the interior fan out and subtly change shape while still continuing the overall pattern.

Think of the way a nautilus shell consists of circular loops but where each one is bigger than the previous. Has car design really come to this? Apparently.

On a more practical level, the sliding rear seat is a master stroke for a vehicle like this one. The two-storey luggage floor is a nice touch, too, although the boot needs to start empty for this to be set up initially. But given Cupra’s place in the scheme of things and its continual hints at cutting-edge technology, you may ask where’s the plug-in hybrid or EV version?

The short answer is production of the plug-in hybrid model starts this week with Australian deliveries due in November this year. And an EV must surely also be on the cards given VW’s announcement that Australia will receive the SUV version of its electric offering, the ID4, and not the hatchback ID3. All of which makes an electric Terramar even more logical. We’ll keep you posted.

Our XLT PHEV has a hefty 2527kg kerb weight which is 318kg more than its 2.0L Bi-Turbo diesel equivalent due largely to the extra weight of the hybrid drivetrain. However, by keeping the battery relatively small, Ford has prioritised workhorse capability over EV driving range based on customer feedback that influenced its design.

The XLT is the lightest of the four Ranger PHEV models which share the same 3500kg GVM, so it has the highest payload rating of 973kg. This is an excellent result, as it’s only 48kg less than the 2.0L Bi-Turbo diesel XLT and exceeds the payload ratings of its Chinese rivals.

The PHEV XLT also matches its diesel equivalent with a 3500kg braked tow rating and with its 6580kg GCM (or how much weight it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can tow its maximum trailer weight with a drop in payload to 553kg, compared to 641kg for the diesel XLT.

The PHEV’s unique load tub has a floor that’s slightly higher to cater for the plug-in battery mounted in specially-designed chassis frame rails beneath it, which importantly allows the full-size spare wheel to be carried out of the way in its usual position under the tail.

The load floor is also 174mm longer at 1638mm, which combined with 1233mm between the rear wheel housings allows it to carry either a standard 1165mm-square Aussie pallet or two 800mm x 1200mm Euro pallets; the latter unmatched by the diesel XLT. The load tub also has a drop-in composite liner, lift-assisted tailgate, internal lighting and six sturdy load-anchorage points.

Like its Chinese rivals, the Ranger PHEV has V2L (Vehicle to Load) electrical capabilities. Ford’s 6.9kW system is called Pro Power Onboard comprising a single 10-amp 2.3kW three-pin electrical socket in the cabin and two 15-amp 3.45kW three-pin sockets housed in the left-side wall of the load-tub.

So, the Ranger PHEV is effectively a mobile generator, which eliminates the need to carry a portable one as it uses the vehicle’s traction battery (charged by the Ranger’s petrol engine as required) to provide potentially hours of energy for worksite equipment or campsites (see Engine).

Driver and front passenger storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each front door plus an overhead glasses-holder and decent sized glove box with an open shelf above it. The centre console offers a phone pad and two USB ports up front, plus a handy slot for storing keys, two cupholders in the centre and a big lidded box at the back with a 12V socket inside.

The rear bench seating is spacious, given I’m 186cm and have about 60mm of headroom and 40mm of knee clearance when sitting behind the driver’s seat set in my position. Shoulder room can be squeezy for three large adults, though.

Rear passenger storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each back door plus pockets on the rear of both front seat backrests. The rear of the centre console has adjustable air-vents plus one of the three 230V three-pin outlets for the Pro Power Onboard system.

The centre seat backrest also folds down to serve as an armrest complete with two cupholders. The bench seat’s base cushions can also swing up and be stored vertically if extra internal cargo space is required and to access two underfloor storage compartments.

There’s an awful lot going on inside the Terramar, stating with all that parametric detailing. But the copper-coloured accents are a genuine point of interest and most of the touchpoints are relatively plush as well as looking good.

Given the side profile of the car and its upswept waistline, you might think the interior would be a bit dark and gloomy. There’s certainly plenty of black on show, but the view out is actually great. Even the typical over-the-shoulder blind-spot isn’t really there.

We managed to sample the entry-level S version and the range-topping VZ and, to be honest, the major difference is the cloth-and-vinyl versus leather seating. The former is okay but never threatens to feel high-end, while the leather in the VZ is quite lovely.

There’s only one catch: If you don’t like burgundy leather, you’re out of luck, because that’s all that’s offered. Optional in the S and V variants, the idea of burgundy leather in, say, a blue car sounds awful, but in the flesh, the colour is quite subtle. Classy, even.

There’s a pair of USB charge ports in the front centre console, and another pair in the rear seat. That rear pew also gets its own climate controls (tri-zone) and central air-vents and there are reading lights as well. It also splits 40/20/40 and the centre armrest folds down to include a pair of cup-holders.

But while the rear seat offers plenty of foot and headroom, knee room is a bit tighter. It’s not terrible, but this car won’t necessarily fit families with older, taller teenage kids. Up front, there’s no shortage of space although the centre console feels quite bulky and definitely separates the front-seat occupants.

You can see and feel a bit of Audi ergonomics rubbing off in the Cupra’s touchscreens and customisable layouts and, as always, we’re big fans of having physical buttons on the centre stack for climate control and other important functions.

The luggage area isn’t huge, but is quite deep and the tailgate has a kick-sensor. Bins at each corner of the cargo area keep smaller items under control, but the inky blackness of the trim in this area means it looks like a black hole when you first open it.

The Cupra Terramar certainly looks like a premium product and that theme continues when you look at the specification.

The entry-level S version gets standard kit such as paddle shifters, 18-inch alloy wheels, LED lighting, a powered tailgate with a kick-sensor, keyless entry and start, powered and heated front seats with a memory function, a head-up display, a heated steering wheel, tri-zone climate control, dual info-screens, full wireless connectivity, ambient lighting and wireless phone charging.

Major accessories include a panoramic sunroof and a stereo upgrade and leather trim option bundled together. The drive-away price for the S is $58,490.

Move up to the $66,490 (drive-away) V variant and you add (aside from the driveline stuff we’ll get to in a moment) 19-inch copper-accented alloys and hill descent control.

The VZ at $73,490 (driveaway) goes one bigger in the wheels department with 20-inch alloys, adaptive suspension, the leather and stereo upgrade package as standard, selectable engine sound, matrix headlights, expanded driver-selectable drive modes and bigger brakes.

The Ranger’s PHEV powertrain consists of a 2.3-litre turbocharged four-cylinder 'EcoBoost' petrol engine that produces 138kW of power at 4600rpm and 411Nm of torque at 2700rpm.

This is paired with a 75kW electric motor which draws its energy from the 11.8kWh lithium-ion traction battery. Combined they produce total outputs of 207kW at 4600rpm and a towering 697Nm at 2500rpm. This is the second-highest power output and highest torque output of any Ranger to date, making it ideal for heavy load hauling and towing.

A 10-speed torque converter automatic integrates the motor between the engine and transmission and offers the choice of sequential manual-shifting.

This drivetrain also offers four selectable drive modes. These comprise ‘Auto EV’ which automatically switches between the petrol engine and battery to prioritise power or fuel efficiency depending on driver demands, ‘EV Now’ which only uses battery power for maximum fuel saving, ‘EV Later’ which prioritises the petrol engine to maintain the current state of battery charge (ideal if planning to use it at your destination or for EV-only driving later) and ‘EV Charge’ for charging the battery between destinations. And if it should become depleted, the Ranger’s petrol engine switches on and starts charging to ensure continued supply.

Traction battery charging is generated by the petrol engine when idling/accelerating/cruising and the motor when decelerating/applying the brakes thanks to regenerative braking. This function can be monitored by the driver using the ‘EV Coach’ display on the instrument cluster.

The PHEV drivetrain offers 2H (2WD High Range) and a full-time 4WD setting (4A) for optimum traction in all on-road conditions. For off-road use there's 4H (4WD High Range) and 4L (4WD Low Range) which both lock the front/rear axle torque split at 50:50, plus a rear diff-lock. The driver can choose from an additional seven drive modes to tailor performance to suit specific off-road terrain and other requirements.

The Terramar range features a choice of two petrol engines and driveline layouts, three outputs and even a mild hybrid variant. In fact, the Terramar S which uses the hybrid driveline also happens to be the entry-level version of the car.

Generally, you’d expect the hybrid version of any line-up to be a more expensive option, but in this case, the hybrid system is one of those barely-there set-ups where a 48-volt electric motor – in this case disguised as the car’s alternator – also acts as the starter motor offering a little more 48-volt acceleration when required, and then recouping some otherwise lost during braking. Most drivers would need to be told the car is a hybrid at all.

Power for the S’s 1.5-litre, turbocharged engine tops out at 110kW, while torque peaks at 250Nm and the S is front-wheel-drive. Like the other variants, the S uses a seven-speed dual-clutch auto transmission.

The next step up the Terramar ladder is badged V and it gets a turbocharged 2.0-litre engine with no hybrid assistance, but an output of 150kW and 320Nm. This will be a familiar engine to anybody who has driven a mid-sized product from the Volkswagen family in the last decade or so.

In V form, the Terramar gains a part-time all-wheel-drive system. This is not driver-selectable but instead uses sensors to know when to shift some of the torque to the rear axle. In normal circumstances, the vehicle remains fundamentally a front-wheel drive one, but under full acceleration or on low-friction surfaces, the computer will send the torque rearward to maximise grip.

The range-topper is the Terramar VZ which is endowed with a retuned version of the same 2.0-litre engine in the V, but now punching out 195kW and 400Nm. The driveline is the same as the V’s but the VZ gets a premium brake package and also adds Cupra’s version of adaptive suspension to the mix. The system can adjust the dampers at up to 1000 times per second to provide the feel and feedback the driver chooses via the selectable driving modes.

And if you want even better brakes, there’s an optional braking package for the VZ which adds six-piston front calipers and larger front rotors. You might expect the mild-hybrid version of the Terramar to be a reasonably heavy vehicle, which it is at 1696kg. But it’s a lightweight compared with the rather hefty V at 1794kg and the decidedly portly VZ at 1803kg.

Ford claims an official combined average petrol consumption of only 2.9L/100km in ideal laboratory conditions, which is largely irrelevant in real-world use.

Our week of testing is a good example given a mix of suburban, city, highway and backroad driving that totalled 409km, during which we often switched between drive modes and hauled a heavy payload for about a quarter of that distance (see Driving).

The dash display was claiming a more realistic 9.3L/100km when we stopped to refuel and our own figure calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings was identical, which highlights the accuracy of Ford’s onboard diagnostics. That’s also thrifty sub-10L/100km economy for a vehicle weighing more than 2.5 tonnes.

So, based on our real-world consumption figure, you could expect an ‘Auto EV’ hybrid driving range of around 750km from its 70-litre tank.

Ford also claims an electric-only driving range of up to 49km, again in ideal lab conditions, but the most we were able to achieve in the real world was 29km. However, we discovered that even that relatively short driving range was more than adequate for many urban requirements (see Driving).

The battery can only be plug-in charged using AC supply (no DC fast-charging) with a maximum charge rate of 3.5kW. However, another benefit of its relatively small battery is that it can be charged from zero to 100 per cent in less than seven hours using a standard 2.3kW domestic three-pin wall socket, as we did each night. And that charge time shortens to around four hours with a 3.5kW charger.

Using the ‘EV Charge’ mode is also efficient at charging the battery with the petrol engine when driving, as it took less than 200km to go from zero to 100 per cent.

Cupra claims a different combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption number for each of the three engines on offer, starting with the mild-hybrid version’s 5.7 litres per 100km. The mid-spec two-litre claims 7.2 litres per 100km and the high output 2.0-litre carries an 8.2 litres per 100km claim.

The standard 55 litre fuel tank in the S, then, should be good for a theoretical range of around 950km, while the V and VZ with their slightly bigger fuel tanks should be able to cover about 830km and 730km, respectively, between trips to the pump.

It pays to keep in mind, however, that Cupra recommends all three engines are run on the pricier 95-octane fuel, rather than standard 91-octane. That will add a few dollars to every fill, but the efficiency of the engines can’t be faulted.

Interestingly, in a mix of highway and city driving, our test VZ managed about 8.5L/100km which is seriously close to the official combined number. Rarely does any car get that close to its government figure.

Handling and braking are beyond criticism as is the ride quality, which is no doubt enhanced by the extra sprung weight of the PHEV hardware that helps iron out the bumps when being driven without a load.

We soon discovered that around 30km of electric-only driving range is more than adequate for the daily chores of suburban ownership within a typical 5.0-10km radius from home, where the modest performance of its 75kW motor (and we assume around 300Nm of torque) did the job with silent efficiency.

We were also impressed by the PHEV's spirited performance in petrol-electric hybrid mode, with almost 700Nm of torque ensuring a strong surge of acceleration from standing starts and outstanding load-hauling ability that belies its higher kerb weight.

The battery reserves enough charge in hybrid mode (even when it’s displaying zero) to ensure the motor is always assisting the petrol engine to deliver the PHEV’s huge combined torque output.

It’s also a quiet and effortless highway cruiser, with the petrol engine requiring only 1800rpm to maintain 110km/h.

To test its load-hauling ability we forklifted 650kg into the load tub, which with our two-man crew equalled a total payload of 830kg that was about 140kg under its legal limit.

The rear leaf-springs only compressed 45mm, with ride, handling and braking unfazed by this weight. And it easily conquered our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h without requiring the dedicated 'Tow/Haul' mode.

Regenerative braking on the way down was also robust but Ford recommends using the Tow/Haul mode on steep descents, as it prioritises engine-braking to ensure that the petrol engine and electric motor are harmonised to provide the strongest retardation.

Let’s start with the S model and its mild hybrid driveline. Frankly, if you can pick this is a hybrid of any sort, you’re doing very well. Sure, any hybrid tech should aim to be as transparent as possible, but this time around, it’s pretty much totally invisible.

So, in the absence of too much electric thrust, the petrol engine is left to do the heavy lifting. And, frankly, with just 110kW to propel it, the 1.5-litre engine has its work cut out. It’s perfectly fine at cruising velocities, but start asking the tough question in hilly country or when powering out of slow corners, and it can all start to feel and sound a bit busy. And yet there’s not the thrust to back up the perception of mechanical activity.

The seven-speed dual-clutch does a good job, but it too is kept mighty occupied by the task of improving velocity. Flapping at the paddle shifters might keep you happy for a while, but the transmission has its own smarts sufficient to make the most of those 110kW.

Which means, of course, the VZ variant is the one for keener drivers. But even then, the excellence of the 2.0-litre turbo when fitted to the Golf GTi is dulled a little when hauling around the Terramar's 1.8 tonnes. It still feels pretty perky, however, and this is certainly not a comparison between a very fast Golf and an SUV, so it’s fair to say the Terramar VZ gets along pretty well.

Again, the dual-clutch auto is your friend, although we reckon its shifts and shift-patterns might have been backed off a little to suit the heavier Cupra.

Ride quality is slightly superior in the S version (18-inch tyres play 20-inch on the VZ) but either specification is tied down pretty well with minimal body roll for this type of vehicle. That plays slightly against outright comfort, but the cabin remains quiet with very little suspension or tyre noise making it inside.

What’s a bit confusing is the way the adaptive dampers have been set-up in the VZ. Rather than using the 'Comfort' drive mode to soften the dampers for small, pattery bumps, Cupra seems to have concentrated on more dramatic, larger wheel movements for the 'Sport' setting. So, the mode-to-mode ride is very, very similar in normal work, but firms up a reasonable amount over longer, swooping bumps that start to use more and more of the available travel.

By far our biggest complaint is that old cracked record about the driver-assistance systems being too insistent. The Terramar is by no means the worst we’ve sampled, but the lane-keeping assistance is over-zealous to the point where you’ll turn it off (defeating the purpose of its inclusion). And the driver distraction alert is just flat out annoying for its habit of confusing any facial expression other than Blue Steel as a clue that you’re nodding off.

Speaking of such technologies, you’d expect all the latest driver assistance aids from a brand like Cupra, and you won’t be disappointed. There’s adaptive cruise control with follow-and-stop abilities, lane-keeping warning and assistance, collision warning, autonomous emergency braking, pedestrian and cyclist recognition, swerve-assist, traffic sign recognition, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, front and rear parking sensors, a 360-degree camera view, driver distraction warning and tyre pressure monitoring.

As well as seven airbags including a centre-front bag, there are also three top-tether restraint mounts in the rear seat and ISOFIX mounts on the outboard rear positions. ANCAP has given the Terramar a maximum five-star safety rating with a 2025 date stamp.

The Ranger PHEV comes standard with a five-year/unlimited km warranty and specific eight years/160,000km warranty for the electric drivetrain and battery. Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km with capped pricing of $399 applying for each scheduled service up to five years/75,000km, whichever occurs first.

Ford also offers pre-paid service packages with substantial savings compared to pay-as-you-go servicing. The Australian Ford dealer network has almost 200 dealerships located throughout city and regional areas, which also provide vehicle servicing.

Cupra’s standard five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the entire Terramar range. While that’s a decent amount of cover, it trails some of the cheaper brands out there with seven, eight or even 10-year warranties.

The Terramar also comes with five years' of roadside assistance including extras like emergency accommodation, towing and even car rental should the unthinkable happen.

Cupra also offers capped-price servicing packages for the Terramar, with an option of three- and five-year plans. The first three years of servicing can be pre-paid at the time of purchase for $1490, while five years' of servicing costs $2590. That’s based on the Terramar’s 15,000km or 12 months service intervals.