Ford Ranger vs Mazda CX-60

What's the difference?

Ford has hit a sweet-spot with the Ranger PHEV XLT, as it can tow up to 3.5 tonnes of braked trailer, carry almost one tonne of payload and serve as a powered site anywhere you need to work or explore. Overall, it’s a well-engineered, practical and versatile all-terrain workhorse that’s as well suited to the needs of tradies and farmers as it is to adventurers.

Have no doubts. The MY25 version of the CX-60 is the SUV that Mazda should have launched in Australia in 2023.

It fulfils the promise of its sophisticated specification, builds on the extensive dynamic abilities of previous models, and now provides a compelling – and unique – choice for medium-SUV buyers who do not need an extended seven-seater.

It may still looks a bit daggy from some angles outside, and we’d like a little bit less suspension noise on the inside, but the CX-60 should now be on Australian family-car shortlists.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

At first glance most would struggle to pick the subtle visual differences between a Ranger PHEV XLT and a turbo-diesel equivalent. These include discreet ‘PHEV’ chrome garnishes on the front fenders and an additional spring-loaded flap on the passenger side to access the traction battery's charging port.

It also has unique wheel designs which are wider than those fitted as standard to diesel variants, which along with new lip mouldings and bespoke tyres have been developed to carry the higher loads of the hybrid powertrain while maintaining payload, towing and handling ability.

The only potential negative for tradies is that the Ranger PHEV is not available in cab-chassis form and the standard load tub cannot be replaced by an aftermarket tray or service body, given the hybrid drivetrain’s traction battery and Pro Power Onboard systems are fully integrated in its design.

If you’re searching for something new in the looks department for the CX-60, you won’t find it, since this is essentially the same car as last year’s model from the outside. Except there’s a new beige colour option.

Which means the same long-bonnet/cab-backward silhouette remains, along with the corporate wing-motif grille, hunched-over styling (that looks awkward from some angles) and short rear overhangs.

Still, the overall effect remains modern, clean and distinct from the nearly-identical and very closely-related CX-70, CX-80 and CX-90 further up the Mazda food chain.

Note that the CX-60 is usefully larger than the CX-5, with the former coming in at 4740mm long, 1890mm wide, 1675mm tall and 2870mm in wheelbase length, compared to the latter’s 4575mm, 1845mm, 1680mm and 2700mm dimensions respectively.

Which, of course, elevates it from an interior point of view.

Our XLT PHEV has a hefty 2527kg kerb weight which is 318kg more than its 2.0L Bi-Turbo diesel equivalent due largely to the extra weight of the hybrid drivetrain. However, by keeping the battery relatively small, Ford has prioritised workhorse capability over EV driving range based on customer feedback that influenced its design.

The XLT is the lightest of the four Ranger PHEV models which share the same 3500kg GVM, so it has the highest payload rating of 973kg. This is an excellent result, as it’s only 48kg less than the 2.0L Bi-Turbo diesel XLT and exceeds the payload ratings of its Chinese rivals.

The PHEV XLT also matches its diesel equivalent with a 3500kg braked tow rating and with its 6580kg GCM (or how much weight it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can tow its maximum trailer weight with a drop in payload to 553kg, compared to 641kg for the diesel XLT.

The PHEV’s unique load tub has a floor that’s slightly higher to cater for the plug-in battery mounted in specially-designed chassis frame rails beneath it, which importantly allows the full-size spare wheel to be carried out of the way in its usual position under the tail.

The load floor is also 174mm longer at 1638mm, which combined with 1233mm between the rear wheel housings allows it to carry either a standard 1165mm-square Aussie pallet or two 800mm x 1200mm Euro pallets; the latter unmatched by the diesel XLT. The load tub also has a drop-in composite liner, lift-assisted tailgate, internal lighting and six sturdy load-anchorage points.

Like its Chinese rivals, the Ranger PHEV has V2L (Vehicle to Load) electrical capabilities. Ford’s 6.9kW system is called Pro Power Onboard comprising a single 10-amp 2.3kW three-pin electrical socket in the cabin and two 15-amp 3.45kW three-pin sockets housed in the left-side wall of the load-tub.

So, the Ranger PHEV is effectively a mobile generator, which eliminates the need to carry a portable one as it uses the vehicle’s traction battery (charged by the Ranger’s petrol engine as required) to provide potentially hours of energy for worksite equipment or campsites (see Engine).

Driver and front passenger storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each front door plus an overhead glasses-holder and decent sized glove box with an open shelf above it. The centre console offers a phone pad and two USB ports up front, plus a handy slot for storing keys, two cupholders in the centre and a big lidded box at the back with a 12V socket inside.

The rear bench seating is spacious, given I’m 186cm and have about 60mm of headroom and 40mm of knee clearance when sitting behind the driver’s seat set in my position. Shoulder room can be squeezy for three large adults, though.

Rear passenger storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each back door plus pockets on the rear of both front seat backrests. The rear of the centre console has adjustable air-vents plus one of the three 230V three-pin outlets for the Pro Power Onboard system.

The centre seat backrest also folds down to serve as an armrest complete with two cupholders. The bench seat’s base cushions can also swing up and be stored vertically if extra internal cargo space is required and to access two underfloor storage compartments.

Like the exterior, the changes for the MY25 CX-60 are pretty much under the skin, with improved noise/vibration and harshness-quelling measures to quieten things down more.

And an exhaust-sound enhancer through the audio system to liven things up if you desire.

Representing the aforementioned $10K saving over the previous entry-level Evolve, the Pure does possess less opulent trim and (nice) cloth seat fabrics, but otherwise the CX-60 does present a larger-than-usual cabin environment compared to smaller medium-sized SUVs.

But fans of big, showy screens may be underwhelmed.

The dash is elegant but somewhat old-fashioned, especially compared to, say, the latest BMW X3’s dazzling displays. It feels like a hangover from last decade’s CX-9.

Yet there’s no denying how satisfyingly easy and logical most of it is, from the super-clear, electronic instrumentation to the simple and effective climate control layout, while the iDrive-style rotary controller means less time with eyes off the road. Safe, intuitive ergonomics. Thank you, Mazda.

Additionally, there’s a quality solidness to the fit and finish that elevates the social-climbing Mazda beyond what a CX-5 could achieve.

All the essentials are also well thought out, from storage and vision out to ventilation and, not least of all, space and seat support, especially when sat on over long distances.

That also carries over to the expansive back-seat environment, with air vents, USB ports, lighting, cupholders and grab handles. The CX-60 is an SUV that a family could grow into without it feeling excessive.

Is this ‘big-medium’ or ‘small-large’ sized?

From the boot’s perspective, either fits, and is one of the reasons why you might consider stepping up to a CX-60. The floor is low, wide, flat and easy to load, as well as beautifully finished.

The 40/20/40 split fold backrests can be folded remotely via Mazda’s Karakuri function, boosting capacity from 477 litres (VDA) to 1726L, while the in-line six-cylinder models have a space-saver spare wheel underneath, leaving PHEV owners with an inadequate tyre repair kit.

Starting from $50,240 (all prices are before on-road costs) for the Pure grade in G40e six-cylinder turbo-petrol-powered guise that should account for nearly half of all sales, this is the new base grade.

It has lost some items compared to the previous entry-level Evolve, but remains a decently-equipped proposition.

Included are LED headlights with auto high beams, keyless entry/start, dual-zone climate control, cloth trim, a 10.25-inch display/touchscreen, a 360-degree view camera, front/rear parking sensors, satellite navigation, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, DAB+ digital radio, eight-speaker audio, vehicle-exit warning, folding/heated exterior mirrors and 18-inch alloy wheels.

There’s also a decent level of advanced driver-assist safety technology like autonomous emergency braking, lane-support systems and adaptive cruise control. More on those later.

Moving up to the Evolve from $55,240 scores you a larger touchscreen (12.3-inches), ground-view monitor, artificial leather trim, a wireless charger, powered tailgate and a few extra safety features like front-cross traffic alert and a driver monitor, while the new Touring grade from $58,240 gains leather trim and heated/powered front seats with driver’s side memory.

Climbing up to the GT from $64,240 adds adaptive LED headlights, panoramic sunroof, Bose 12-speaker audio upgrade, a powered/heated steering wheel, hands-free tailgate operation, heated rear seats, glossier trim and 20-inch alloys, while the Azami from $68,440 includes Nappa leather, glitzier finishes, vented front seats and more.

Speaking of more, $2000 extra buys you a white interior with unique woven textiles (Azami Takumi pack) or a sportier tan colour edition (Azami SP pack).

Want more economy? Diesel adds another $2000 while going for the PHEV powertrain ups that by a whopping $11,050 across all grades. We’re grateful for the choice, Mazda.

These certainly sound expensive for a mid-sized SUV from Japan, but the CX-60 is considerably larger and roomier than, say, a CX-5 or Toyota RAV4, and possesses a level of sophisticated engineering that puts it in Audi Q5, BMW X3, Lexus NX, Mercedes-Benz GLC and Volvo XC60 territory – and the least-expensive of these kicks off from upwards of $20,000 more, depending on spec.

As a sub-luxury premium proposition, then, the CX-60 lives in a sort of no-man’s land. Yet its styling certainly reveals where Mazda’s aspirations lie.

The Ranger’s PHEV powertrain consists of a 2.3-litre turbocharged four-cylinder 'EcoBoost' petrol engine that produces 138kW of power at 4600rpm and 411Nm of torque at 2700rpm.

This is paired with a 75kW electric motor which draws its energy from the 11.8kWh lithium-ion traction battery. Combined they produce total outputs of 207kW at 4600rpm and a towering 697Nm at 2500rpm. This is the second-highest power output and highest torque output of any Ranger to date, making it ideal for heavy load hauling and towing.

A 10-speed torque converter automatic integrates the motor between the engine and transmission and offers the choice of sequential manual-shifting.

This drivetrain also offers four selectable drive modes. These comprise ‘Auto EV’ which automatically switches between the petrol engine and battery to prioritise power or fuel efficiency depending on driver demands, ‘EV Now’ which only uses battery power for maximum fuel saving, ‘EV Later’ which prioritises the petrol engine to maintain the current state of battery charge (ideal if planning to use it at your destination or for EV-only driving later) and ‘EV Charge’ for charging the battery between destinations. And if it should become depleted, the Ranger’s petrol engine switches on and starts charging to ensure continued supply.

Traction battery charging is generated by the petrol engine when idling/accelerating/cruising and the motor when decelerating/applying the brakes thanks to regenerative braking. This function can be monitored by the driver using the ‘EV Coach’ display on the instrument cluster.

The PHEV drivetrain offers 2H (2WD High Range) and a full-time 4WD setting (4A) for optimum traction in all on-road conditions. For off-road use there's 4H (4WD High Range) and 4L (4WD Low Range) which both lock the front/rear axle torque split at 50:50, plus a rear diff-lock. The driver can choose from an additional seven drive modes to tailor performance to suit specific off-road terrain and other requirements.

For now, the base engine is the 209kW/450Nm G40e, a 3.3-litre turbo-petrol ‘six’ delivering the sort of healthy power figures that late-model Commodore and Falcon buyers would appreciate.

There’s also the 187kW/550Nm D50e turbo-diesel version, for extra pulling power and economy, and we’re getting into premium Euro territory here, because both offer a 48-volt, mild-hybrid system, employing a small electric motor located behind the engine to boost torque yet cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

Mazda says new motor control and clutch slip control software facilitates “…smoother transitions as the electric motor is activated and deactivated”. We hope so!

Last but not least, there’s the 241kW/500Nm P50e plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrain, combining the familiar 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a larger, 129kW electric motor powered by a 17.8kWh Lithium ion battery. The latter allows up to 76km of pure-electric driving, and can be recharged either by regenerative braking when driving or plugged into a Type 2 port.

All three engines use a revised eight-speed, wet multi-plate-clutch automatic transmission, still driving the rear or, as traction and/or performance needs arise, all four wheels.

Yep, this is essentially a rear-drive-biased family SUV, with a sophisticated double wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up to keep everything in line.

So, what’s changed underneath compared to last year’s CX-60?

Among the modifications are stiffer dampers and softer rear springs to address ride-comfort issues with the old car; relocated front knuckle mounts; altered rear axle bushes and the removal of the rear anti-roll bar for more stable control; shorter rear bump stops for greater suspension travel; an extra joint in the steering column quells vibrations while updated software improves steering feel and electronic stability control operation. The goal is for noticeably smoother, comfier and more linear dynamics. 

Result? To find out how much better or worse Mazda’s latest mid-sized SUV is, we drove the it in a variety of conditions, from the push-and-shove of Melbourne’s bumper-to-bumper peak-hour traffic, to a series of demanding emergency-swerve and multi-speed ride and handling test manoeuvres at the legendary Lang Lang proving ground that shaped so many of our iconic Holdens.

More on that a bit later on.

Ford claims an official combined average petrol consumption of only 2.9L/100km in ideal laboratory conditions, which is largely irrelevant in real-world use.

Our week of testing is a good example given a mix of suburban, city, highway and backroad driving that totalled 409km, during which we often switched between drive modes and hauled a heavy payload for about a quarter of that distance (see Driving).

The dash display was claiming a more realistic 9.3L/100km when we stopped to refuel and our own figure calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings was identical, which highlights the accuracy of Ford’s onboard diagnostics. That’s also thrifty sub-10L/100km economy for a vehicle weighing more than 2.5 tonnes.

So, based on our real-world consumption figure, you could expect an ‘Auto EV’ hybrid driving range of around 750km from its 70-litre tank.

Ford also claims an electric-only driving range of up to 49km, again in ideal lab conditions, but the most we were able to achieve in the real world was 29km. However, we discovered that even that relatively short driving range was more than adequate for many urban requirements (see Driving).

The battery can only be plug-in charged using AC supply (no DC fast-charging) with a maximum charge rate of 3.5kW. However, another benefit of its relatively small battery is that it can be charged from zero to 100 per cent in less than seven hours using a standard 2.3kW domestic three-pin wall socket, as we did each night. And that charge time shortens to around four hours with a 3.5kW charger.

Using the ‘EV Charge’ mode is also efficient at charging the battery with the petrol engine when driving, as it took less than 200km to go from zero to 100 per cent.

One area where the Mazda did not need fixing is in its fuel economy.

All of the CX-60’s powertrains are rated at Euro 5.

Officially, the G40e 3.3-litre petrol averages 7.4L/100km, on the combined cycle, and emits 174 grams per kilometre of CO2. Urban and Extra Urban numbers are 9.9L/100km and 6.0L/100km.

Fitted with a 58L petrol tank, expect an average range of around 780km. And it will run on standard 91 RON unleaded petrol to boot.

Moving on to the D50e 3.3L diesel, it manages an impressive 5.0L/100km, for a CO2 figure of 132g/km, resulting in a range average of about 1160km. Its Urban/Extra Urban figures are 5.5/4.7L/100km respectively.

And, finally, there’s the P50e 2.5L PHEV, offering a theoretical 2.1L/100km, for a CO2 figure of just 49g/km, for an unlikely range average of 2380km from its 50L tank, though on 95 RON premium unleaded brew.

Out in the real world, and mostly driven harder than a typical owner might, the trip computer in the PHEV showed low sevens, while the diesel displayed mid-eights and the petrol high nines, which aren’t too bad at all.

Handling and braking are beyond criticism as is the ride quality, which is no doubt enhanced by the extra sprung weight of the PHEV hardware that helps iron out the bumps when being driven without a load.

We soon discovered that around 30km of electric-only driving range is more than adequate for the daily chores of suburban ownership within a typical 5.0-10km radius from home, where the modest performance of its 75kW motor (and we assume around 300Nm of torque) did the job with silent efficiency.

We were also impressed by the PHEV's spirited performance in petrol-electric hybrid mode, with almost 700Nm of torque ensuring a strong surge of acceleration from standing starts and outstanding load-hauling ability that belies its higher kerb weight.

The battery reserves enough charge in hybrid mode (even when it’s displaying zero) to ensure the motor is always assisting the petrol engine to deliver the PHEV’s huge combined torque output.

It’s also a quiet and effortless highway cruiser, with the petrol engine requiring only 1800rpm to maintain 110km/h.

To test its load-hauling ability we forklifted 650kg into the load tub, which with our two-man crew equalled a total payload of 830kg that was about 140kg under its legal limit.

The rear leaf-springs only compressed 45mm, with ride, handling and braking unfazed by this weight. And it easily conquered our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h without requiring the dedicated 'Tow/Haul' mode.

Regenerative braking on the way down was also robust but Ford recommends using the Tow/Haul mode on steep descents, as it prioritises engine-braking to ensure that the petrol engine and electric motor are harmonised to provide the strongest retardation.

This is the acid test. Does the CX-60 drive like a Mazda should?

In the engine department, definitely.

The changes that Mazda has made to the transmission calibration means that it no longer hunts indecisively between ratios like it used to, and that results in smoother shifts as well as a more relaxed driving experience.

And that's across the range, whether we're talking about the six-cylinder diesel or petrol, or four-pot plug-in hybrid. And the latter brings the biggest surprise, because the changes made to the gearbox have resulted in a much more pleasant car around town, with no more shunting or jerky movements to contend with.

And then there's the ride, which is palpably softer than before. The suspension is significantly more pliable and comfortable as a consequence, offering better bump absorption, improved control at speed and basically just a more refined experience. We tried several of the Lang Lang Proving Ground’s rough-road tests, which the CX-60 sailed over without any of the hard jarring of the previous model, which Mazda helpfully provided for back-to-back assessments.

So, how does all that translate in everyday driving?

Well, the latest CX-60 is way more comfortable to ride in across the board, it handles and corners with greater control and linearity, seems quieter and it's just a suppler experience overall.

As there was so much that was good with the original CX-60 anyway, including muscular performance from the inline six-cylinder turbos, impressive high-speed stability and exceptional body control through fast turns, the modifications for 2025 do much to elevate an already good thing.

So, it's a win-win situation. If you are in the market for a sub-premium, mid-sized SUV with performance and space, as well as newfound comfort and sophistication, you can do a lot worse than check out the CX-60. It is that much better than before.

Thankfully, the CX-60 isn’t frugal on safety, scoring a five-star ANCAP crash-test rating back in 2022.

An extensive suite of driver-assist tech is standard, and it’s all nicely tuned for Australian roads, unlike some Chinese vehicles we’ve tested and that’s an important distinction.

These include autonomous emergency braking (AEB) for cyclists, pedestrians and in back-over situations, blind-spot monitoring, vehicle exit warning, lane-departure, lane-assist and emergency lane-keep tech, driver attention alert, forward obstruction warning, rear cross-traffic alert, turn-across traffic and adaptive cruise control tech with full stop/go.

However, front cross-traffic alert, 'Cruising/Traffic Support' (that assists drivers in slow-moving traffic with automatic accelerator, brake and steering control to maintain a safe distance from the vehicle ahead) and see-through view front camera are not in the Pure. Adaptive LED headlights and drowsy driver alert only start from GT up, while emergency brake assist is for the Azami grade only.

All CX-60s include front and rear parking sensors, surround-view cameras, tyre pressure monitors and traffic sign recognition.

The AEB for vulnerable road users works between 10km/h and 80km/h, and the AEB car-to-car operates between 4km/h and 160km/h.

Likewise, the extensive lane-support systems work between 55km/h and 195km/h.

There are also eight airbags, as well as a trio of child-seat restraining top-tether points fitted, along with two ISOFIX latches in the rear outboard seats.

The Ranger PHEV comes standard with a five-year/unlimited km warranty and specific eight years/160,000km warranty for the electric drivetrain and battery. Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km with capped pricing of $399 applying for each scheduled service up to five years/75,000km, whichever occurs first.

Ford also offers pre-paid service packages with substantial savings compared to pay-as-you-go servicing. The Australian Ford dealer network has almost 200 dealerships located throughout city and regional areas, which also provide vehicle servicing.

Mazda could also do a bit better with its warranty nowadays, since its five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance is decidedly average.

Service intervals are at 12 months or every 15,000km, while a fixed-price service scheme is available, starting from $463 per service depending on powertrain. That’s for the petrol. The diesels start from $500 while the PHEVs commence from $435.