Kia Pv5 vs Smart 3

What's the difference?

The PV5 Cargo has been designed from scratch as a full-electric van resulting in a refined and sophisticated workhorse that's enjoyable to drive. Its modest cargo volume won’t suit all mid-size van buyers but its compact dimensions, clever cabin design with ample storage, zero 'tailpipe' emissions, 3.6kW V2L practicality and long service intervals should make it well suited to a wide variety of working roles.

The #3 Brabus is very nearly one of the great bargains of 2024, with the sort of style, luxury, features, performance and grip you’d expect from the much-more-expensive GLA AMG 45. It’s that good.

What would make it great is a sunblock for the hot glass roof on a sunny day, Australian road tuning for the infuriating ADAS tech and a revised steering tune that didn’t make it feel inconsistent at times.

See past these, though, and the #3 Brabus exceeds expectations.

We’re glad Smart is back.

The PV5 Cargo’s exterior styling is clean and boxy with a practical appearance that embraces Kia’s signature ‘Tiger Face’ design language, including distinctive LED daytime running lights that extend into the windscreen pillars. Its slippery aerodynamic drag co-efficient of just 0.286 Cd would be impressive for a passenger car and outstanding for a commercial van in optimising energy efficiency (see driving range).

The minimalist cabin design is spacious and practical with a fabric-trimmed pair of bucket seats and a dash that’s free of protrusions to allow drivers ‘walk through’ access to the passenger door, which is appealing for delivery work.

The PV5’s compact 4695mm overall length is not only more than half a metre shorter than the Toyota HiAce but also slightly shorter than a Peugeot Partner LWB small van, so it makes light work of accessing tight parking spaces.

It also rides on a 2995mm wheelbase with a compact 11-metre turning circle to enable easy manoeuvering in confined spaces. And the PV5’s 1899mm height is almost 100mm lower than the HiAce, providing more clearance in height restricted areas like multi-storey car parks which is handy if carrying loads on the roof.

The front motor/front-wheel drive layout also eliminates the need for a driveshaft to the rear wheels, resulting in a conspicuously low floor height of only 419mm for easier loading and generous internal load height (see Practicality).

Smart says Mercedes designed the #3 and it shows.

In silhouette, or when glanced peripherally, it could be the love child of the A-Class and EQA. Only the friendly face betrays its non-Benz heritage.

Longer and wider than the #1, it is also 80mm lower – achieved via a lower ride height, flatter seats and a thinner floor.

Helped by a 35mm wheelbase stretch, it provides a nicely-balanced and proportioned crossover, with a decent drag coefficient of 0.27. The Brabus’ big wheels also fill out the arches very nicely.

Key length/width/height/wheelbase dimensions are 4400mm/1844mm/1556mm and 2785mm, respectively.

Unusually for a coupe/crossover mash-up, there’s slightly more room inside compared to the upright donor model.

Let’s take a longer look in there.

Its 1910kg kerb weight is relatively light for a full-electric van which when deducted from its 2650kg GVM results in a 740kg payload. It’s also rated to tow up to 750kg of (braked or unbraked) trailer which although small compared to diesel rivals is probably not a high priority for electric van buyers.

The cargo bay’s key dimensions are 2250mm in length and 1565mm in width with its low floor allowing 1520mm of internal load height, which surprisingly is 180mm more than the HiAce and superior to Transit Custom and Staria Load despite the PV5’s lower roof height.

However, its compact dimensions also result in a cargo bay load volume of 4420 litres (VDA) or just over 4.4 cubic metres which is less than major mid-size rivals (typically around low-5.0 to high-6.0 cubic metres) so it may not suit buyers requiring higher load volumes.

Even so, according to our tape measure the PV5 should just fit a standard 1165mm-square Aussie pallet or two 800 x 1200mm Euro pallets with the rear pallet loaded longitudinally, given the relatively narrow 920mm floor width between the rear wheel housings dictated by the low-riding suspension architecture.

High build quality is evident throughout the solid-walled cargo bay which is accessed via sliding doors on each side with 775mm openings (so no side pallet loading) or from the rear through twin-swing doors with 180-degree opening to optimise forklift and loading dock access. No swing-up tailgate option is available.

The walls and doors are lined to mid-height and the load floor is equipped with eight sturdy load anchorage points. There’s also bright LED lighting and a 3.6kW V2L three-pin wall socket behind a neat sliding cover.

Abundant storage is evident throughout the well-designed cabin, including three tiers in each door with the largest central bins providing twin bottle holders.

The dash has a sizeable clamshell-lid compartment ahead of the driver with its own USB-C port, along with a glove box and central fascia offering two more USB-C ports, A 12V socket, wireless phone charging and a large drawer at floor level.

There’s also storage compartments under each seat and lidded underfloor storage in both footwells, plus a sizeable console between the seats containing two cup holders and a large bin. An unusual but welcome inclusion is bins behind each seat, which are ideal for storing items like the portable AC charger/cable bag.

On first approach, you ask yourself whether the #3 is a crossover or a small-to-medium SUV. The low roof and cool frameless doors certainly suggest the former, as do the comparatively small apertures.

That said, with the windows down, those sash-less doors help entry and egress.

Once ensconced inside a long if slightly narrow cabin, the #3 offers ample room for even the tallest adults up front, as well as a reasonably spacious back seat area, though you’d call that more of a '2+1' seater given the lack of girth for three. Most folk shouldn’t struggle to find the right driving position, either.

Presumably keen to impart a generic Mercedes vibe, the #3’s interior is somewhat reminiscent of a GLA’s, albeit from last decade – down to the pronounced T-shape dash featuring a trio of circular vents in the middle, a standalone screen above and (unconvincing) metal-look plastic trim below.

Understandably, like so much of the Brabus, this might appeal to aspiring A45 AMG owners, but it seems oddly dated, given the advanced electrification going on underneath.

Likewise, none of the minimalism cleverness of the ForTwo city-car original is referenced, even digitally. A lost opportunity, really. The OG Smart is an icon.

Meanwhile, ahead of the driver, a narrow digital strip looks twee and cheap, as if ripped from a Japanese 'Kei' car. It’s a strange design detail for a $71K SUV.

Still, the #3’s cabin layout is largely a success, and much of that is due to the first-class quality and finish. Unlike some of the aforementioned Benzes of the previous decade, squeaks and rattles are notable by their absence.

Depending on your body, the racy sports seats up front are either perfectly bolstered or far-too snug, but they provide a decent level of comfort and support. And they position you just right for controlling the centre display, which dominates all.

The 12.8-inch touchscreen feels slick, responsive and right-sized for the car. At first, it can also seem like info-overload and perhaps a bit cheesy with its animal animations, but real thought has gone into it to provide an extraordinary level of functionality.

Across the top are icons for access to media, sat-nav, apps and camera view settings, while the bottom row is for various climate and trip info. While somewhat logically presented, the charging-station list seemed outdated and/or at-times incorrect in our test car.

Mercifully, the Smart has a row of short-cut buttons for 'Vehicle Modes' (including turning off the infernal lane assist and one-pedal accelerator/braking), 'Driving Mode' ('Eco'/'Comfort'/'Sport'/'Brabus'), glass demisters, climate and display-off.

Annoyingly, the latter is closest to reach, revealing the #3’s left-hand drive market bias, as the driver must stretch across to access the first two (and more important) settings.

There are also several handy screen-activated modes including 'Entertainment Mode' that temporarily leaves the accessories and climate control on; 'Rest Mode' reclines the driver’s seat down flat and dims the interior lights; 'Energise Mode' is designed to pep you up; and 'Pet Mode' keeps a climate-controlled atmosphere while deactivating all buttons that a stray paw might press. Clever.

There’s lots more besides, and using the touchscreen is better in this than most other Chinese vehicles, but it remains fiddly and distracting.

It’s also worth pointing out that the fixed glass roof needs a blockout for Australia. A Smart spokesperson said an aftermarket cover is available, but as supplied to us, sitting under it over a run of hot days is almost unbearable without a hat. This is not good enough.

Thankfully, the other basics are all A-OK.

The climate system coped well the hot sun bearing down through the glass, plenty of useful storage makes up for the disappointingly shallow glove box, while the chilled centre console and massive door bins proved especially handy.

USB access is easy, the wireless Bluetooth/Apple CarPlay performed more consistently than in any recent test vehicle and the standard Beats audio brings brilliant sound.

Out back, most people under 180cm should at least avoid scraping that glass ceiling, and there’s a reasonable amount of room for boots and long knees if the front occupants are sympathetic, but you’d be stretching the truth calling the rear seat packaging SUV-esque.

On the other hand, it’s beautifully presented, boasts a comfy and supportive backrest/cushion for outboard passengers and even a do-able centre pew for shorter-distance riders.

And it provides every expected amenity, including air vents, USB-C ports, door storage, a folding centre armrest with cupholders, and overhead handles/lighting/coat hooks.

And while we’ve already complained about the glass roof, it floods the cabin with light, to make it seem airier than it is. Narrow front seats with a see-through slit further enhance this feeling.

Further back, the 370-litre boot is reasonably long and surprisingly deep thanks to a removable upper floor that’s good for stuffing the optional home charging cables in.

And, of course, it can be extended to 1160L via the split-fold backrests to provide extra loading practicality. And there’s even a small (15L) amount of storage under the bonnet.

Maximum towing capacity is 1600kg for a braked trailer.

Though originally brought to market by Mercedes, Smart was never pitched as a premium brand, as it is now.

Back in the late ‘90s, Smart was an early attempt at better urban mobility. The ForTwo was a tad over 2.5 metres long by 1.5m wide and 1.5m tall.

Today, the #1 and #3 share their modular EV platform with Geely’s other small crossovers, including the Volvo EX30 and Zeekr X, while a stretched version underpins the related Polestar 4.

While the #1 starts from a sharp $54,900 (all prices are before on-road costs) for the Pro+, at the other end of the spectrum, the #3 Brabus flagship, with dual motors for all-wheel drive (AWD) and Porsche 911-style acceleration, will set you back $70,900.

Not bad, given it also includes a body kit, extra driving modes, beefier suspension, stronger brakes and retuned traction controls.

Now, that might sound steep against the growing choice of more-affordable EV alternatives out there, but consider that most of the cheaper ones are significantly slower, less sporty and/or not as highly equipped, including the Hyundai Kona Electric, Jeep Avenger and Mini Countryman.

The #3 Brabus’ fiercest foe, the bestselling Tesla Model Y in top Performance guise, is more powerful but costs $12K more and is slightly slower from 0-100km/h.

The $70K Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance Ultra costs $1K less and matches the Smart performance-wise as they share the same tech, but it’s considerably smaller.

Meanwhile, the closely-related Zeekr X is $6K cheaper but looks bizarre and is still largely unknown in Australia. At least Smart has that long-time Merc association to fall back on.

In fact, it is distributed by the latter’s biggest dealer group globally, LSH Automotive.

Speaking of which, how does the #3 Brabus stack up against the similar Mercedes EQA and other luxury EV rivals? The less-powerful Merc 250+ is $14K more, has less kit and is nowhere near as powerful. Same goes for BMW iX2, Lexus UX300e and Volvo C40 Recharge (alias EC40).

The #3 Brabus seems to be in a goldilocks zone of premium, performance EV SUVs. The most expensive Smart offers thoughtful value for money. For a change, the car actually lives up to its name.

Predictably, it’s also well stocked, with matrix LED headlights, electric heated/vented front seats, a 12.8-inch touchscreen, head-up display, 640W Beats audio, a foot-actuated powered tailgate, 360-degree camera views, the full advanced driver-assist safety enchilada, auto parking assist, 20-inch alloys and a panoramic glass roof.

Unfortunately, fitted on every Smart, that last one does not come with a factory built-in sunblock, which is completely unacceptable under our hot Australian sun. And no crossover or SUV should be without a spare wheel, either.

These are the #3’s only real deal-breakers.

The PV5 Cargo is powered by a front-mounted electric motor that produces up to 120kW of power and 250Nm of torque, which drives the front wheels through a single-speed automatic transmission.

This drivetrain offers three selectable drive modes comprising ‘Normal’, ‘Eco’ and ‘Snow’ plus adjustment of regenerative braking intensity/battery replenishment using the steering wheel-mounted paddles.

These include levels from L1 to L3 topped by the premium ‘i-Pedal’ setting, which allows convenient one-pedal driving that makes the brake pedal largely redundant.

The #3 Brabus employs one permanent magnet synchronous electric motor per axle, for dual-motor, all-wheel drive performance via a single-speed ‘transmission’. 

They provide plenty of poke, totalling 315kW of power (115kW front, 200kW rear) and 543Nm of torque (200Nm front, 343Nm rear).

Tipping the scales at 1910kg, this means the Brabus delivers an impressive power-to-weight ratio of 165kW/tonne – enough for it to scoot from zero to 100km/h in 3.7 seconds, on the way to a 180km/h top speed.

To put those figures in perspective, the similarly-priced VW Golf R only manages 156kW/tonne and 4.8sec to 100.

The PV5 Cargo is equipped with a lithium-ion NCM (Nickel Cobalt Manganese) 71.2kWh long-range propulsion battery mounted under the load floor which Kia claims has (WLTP) combined average consumption of 19.1kWh/100km and up to 416km of driving range.

Only the much higher priced VW ID Buzz Cargo has a longer range and not by much (431km). All other full-electric vans have ranges starting with a two or three.

The PV5 uses a Type 2 CCS charge port capable of AC and DC charging. Kia claims charging from 10-100 per cent in around six hours 30 minutes using an 11kW AC wall-box, which is ideal for overnight charging. Alternatively, 10-80 per cent with a 50kW DC fast charger takes around one hour, which drops to only half an hour with a 350kW DC charger.

Our test vehicle had 100 per cent charge at the start of our week-long test, during which we initially drove 197km unladen in busy metro traffic with 44 per cent charge and 199km range remaining. Using the portable AC charger/cable with three-pin domestic plug, we charged at home which provided enough battery top-up to cover the remainder of the test.

Our total test distance was 293km which including more than 50km hauling its maximum payload. Even so, we managed average consumption of 17.4kWh/100km across the week which was lower than Kia’s official figure and no doubt enhanced by consistent use of either (L3) high regen or one-pedal settings.

So, based on our test figures, Kia’s claim of up to 416km from a single charge is credible and impressive efficiency for a full-electric van in real-world use.

All #3s headed to Australia for now are fitted with the larger of the two battery packs available – a 66kWh lithium nickel cobalt manganese (NCM) item.

In the Brabus, it is rated to average up to 415km of WLTP-certified range, which is between 20-40km shy of the mid-spec Premium version.

Smart says the WLTP average energy consumption is 17.7kWh/100km. Our 3000km-old test car’s trip computer displayed a life-cycle average of 14.6kWh/100km since delivery.

During our week with the Brabus, we managed an average of 19.4kWh/100km, and that was over a 95km period of sustained highway driving at 114km/h with cruise control on and climate control set at 18 degrees (to combat the radiant heat from that glass roof).

With a big 22kW AC charger and 150kW DC charger capability, the former will replenish that 66kWh battery in about 32 hours using a home plug or 10 hours with an optional 7.0kW Wallbox, while the latter will need just over an hour from 10-80 per cent with a common 50kW DC charger.

The cabin ergonomics are excellent even for tall people, as they provide a car-like driving position enhanced by numerous comfort features including a fold-down inboard armrest, power adjustable lumbar support, large left footrest and well-placed padded elbow rests on the doors.

There’s also ample headroom and the flat-bottom steering wheel ensures easy boarding with plenty of torso room. Glazed inserts within the windscreen pillars combined with a low beltline and large door windows provide a bright and airy ambience with excellent driver visibility.

Despite being a solid-walled van with no rear vision for its central mirror (it’s only fitted to meet ADRs) all-around vision for the driver is excellent thanks to large door mirrors and numerous active safety systems including multiple parking sensors and camera monitoring.

Kia’s local ride/handling team has done a commendable job in combining load-carrying practicality with a smooth and supple ride, car-like handling and nice steering feel which provides a level of driver enjoyment not usually associated with commercial vans.

We found the i-Pedal mode appealing given its ability to require only one-pedal driving most of the time while optimising battery charge/driving range.

Although the PV5’s 120kW/250Nm outputs are modest on paper, its relatively light kerb weight combined with near instant torque reaction from its electric motor results in energetic response from standing starts, with 0-100km/h acceleration that matches its diesel rivals.

It’s also very quiet thanks to its electric drivetrain combined with the cabin bulkhead which largely insulates the driver from the cargo bay’s rear tyre noise, which is typically the loudest noise path in commercial vans.

To test its GVM rating we used a forklift (fitted with long tynes) to load 650kg into the front of the cargo bay through the rear doors, which with driver equalled a total payload of 740kg that was right on its payload limit. The rear suspension only compressed 33mm under this weight.

Acceleration was slightly subdued as you'd expect but more than adequate for keeping this big payload moving without feeling sluggish. Handling response was barely affected, with the supple rear suspension ensuring no bottoming out over bumps.

Average energy consumption displayed on-screen barely increased under this load which was hauled mostly on metro roads. However, greater increases could occur if carrying similar loads in hilly terrain, strong headwinds, towing etc.

Overall, the PV5 Cargo is hard to fault from a driver’s point of view apart from the cabin’s climate settings being controlled by relatively small central touchscreen prompts, which can be tricky at times for large fingers to operate while driving compared to physical buttons and dials.

Whatever notions ‘Smart’ might evoke, the #3 Brabus obliterates them. This is no buzzy little city-car runabout, but a surprisingly mature and athletic driving machine. This is a seriously rapid performer.

A trio of driving modes give you a hint of what you’re in for. Eco is lightness and fluff. Not very Brabus, but smooth and calm enough for relaxed commuting. And it’s far from slow, scooting off the line with zip and zest. Enough for most.

Comfort is actually a good all-round setting to be in, with an eager yet controlled level of performance. Strong acceleration and instant accelerator reaction show you mean business – if you’re in the mood. Still civilised and serene otherwise.

Sport ups the ante, as you’d expect, providing a decent whack of speed and immediate response. Actually, this is enough to keep up with most sports car costing thrice the price, while maintaining the driver-assist safety net. Fun without the fear.

Brabus mode is off-the-leash fury, turning the #3 into a convincing AMG alternative thanks to blistering thrust and a powerful punch across the spectrum. More (artificial) noise, more drama, more speed, more fireworks. The 'Launch Control' pins you to your seatback.

Yet even in the latter setting, the Smart behaves with a maturity beyond the brand’s reputation, capable of quick corners with exceptional (AWD-enhanced) body control and roadholding grip, without a punishing ride.

Underneath, a unique suspension tune for the MacPherson-style struts up front and multi-link rear end keep the Brabus hunkered down more effectively at speed.

And even in pouring rain, there are no complaints about the Brabus’ assured and confident handling. Yes, the suspension is firm, but it’s far from uncomfortable, so, an acceptable trade-off.

Plus, though not strictly one-pedal driving, the regenerative braking pressure is enough for slowing down and speeding up in the ebb and flow of traffic in its strongest mode.

Where we’re less happy is in the #3’s steering. It brings three weight modes to the table – but only two are useful, 'Light' and 'Standard'. Super-easy yet not totally devoid of substance, Light is great for around town and general commuting.

But when you lean on it at speed, the steering, whilst crisp and reactive, is not always linear in feel or motion, especially when accelerating at the same time, as you might when coming out of a fast corner.

Depending on how hard you are on the accelerator, there can be a visible step when turned from the straight ahead that can be quite disconcerting. It’s a bit like when slurping in a lumpy bit in a smoothie.

So, what about 'Sport' mode? Here, the steering is just as described above, but with added weight and not much more. Not worth it. Best is Standard mode.

Another disappointment is the advanced driver-assist safety (ADAS) tech’s state of tune. It’s in a state, literally.

The intrusive and apparently non-permanently switch-off-able lane-keep systems, especially, end up resisting what the driver intends, and even fight to steer the car where it thinks it needs to be. This is frustrating and potentially dangerous.

It’s been reported that Geely, and not Mercedes, undertook the development of these ADAS systems. We’re getting sick of (mostly Chinese) manufacturers rolling the arm over and imposing this sort of nannying and ultimately counter-intuitive driving interference tech.

This needs to be fixed. It stops the #3 Brabus from being a great performance bargain.

The #3 range scores a maximum five-star ANCAP crash-test safety rating. It managed high-80s to 90 per cent in all disciplines – Adult Occupant Protection, Child Occupant Protection, Vulnerable Road User and Safety Assist systems.

A full suite of ADAS is fitted, from Autonomous Emergency Braking (operable from 5.0-150km/h car-to-car) with junction, cross-path, pedestrian, cyclist and motorcyclist detection (5.0-85km/h), lane-keep assist (from 65-180km/h) and cross-traffic alert (front and rear), to blind-spot warning and traffic-sign recognition tech.

You’ll also find adaptive cruise control (with stop/go function), highway and traffic jam assist, automatic parking assist, front and rear parking sensors, 360-degree camera and adaptive high beam assist.

Included, too, are seven airbags (dual front, side chest, side head and front-centre), along with two ISOFIX child-seat fixtures and child-seat anchorage points in the back seat.

Comes standard with a seven years/150,000km warranty plus a separate warranty of the same duration covering the propulsion battery. Roadside assist for up to eight years is also available if serviced at an authorised Kia dealer.

Scheduled servicing is every 24 months/30,000km whichever occurs first, with Kia offering a pre-paid service plan covering the first four scheduled services up to four years/120,000km which totals $2246 or an average of $562 per service. This is one of the strongest warranty/service packages offered for a full-electric van, backed by a national network of more than 150 Kia dealers across all states and territories.

The #3 offers a (decidedly-average) five-year or (disappointing) 130,000km warranty, whichever comes first. There is also roadside assistance available for free during this period.

Given other EV manufacturers are going seven and even 10 years in the case of MG, with most including unlimited kilometres, this could be better.

Scheduled maintenance is every 12 months or every 20,000km.

Smart provides a pre-paid four-year/80,000km service plan for $3120, which comes to $780 annually. This seems quite expensive for an EV, even a premium one.