Kia Pv5 vs Mini Cooper

What's the difference?

The PV5 Cargo has been designed from scratch as a full-electric van resulting in a refined and sophisticated workhorse that's enjoyable to drive. Its modest cargo volume won’t suit all mid-size van buyers but its compact dimensions, clever cabin design with ample storage, zero 'tailpipe' emissions, 3.6kW V2L practicality and long service intervals should make it well suited to a wide variety of working roles.

The new petrol Cooper range very gently evolves the upmarket Cool Britannia cliché BMW invented with the R50 back in 2001 and fostered with every iteration since.

More of the same, only slightly updated and just improved enough to justify trading the old one in. If this appeals to you, then go for it. This is the best petrol version yet. Probably.

But the Cooper’s real spark literally and metaphorically lies within the EV version.

Two very different Minis indeed.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

The PV5 Cargo’s exterior styling is clean and boxy with a practical appearance that embraces Kia’s signature ‘Tiger Face’ design language, including distinctive LED daytime running lights that extend into the windscreen pillars. Its slippery aerodynamic drag co-efficient of just 0.286 Cd would be impressive for a passenger car and outstanding for a commercial van in optimising energy efficiency (see driving range).

The minimalist cabin design is spacious and practical with a fabric-trimmed pair of bucket seats and a dash that’s free of protrusions to allow drivers ‘walk through’ access to the passenger door, which is appealing for delivery work.

The PV5’s compact 4695mm overall length is not only more than half a metre shorter than the Toyota HiAce but also slightly shorter than a Peugeot Partner LWB small van, so it makes light work of accessing tight parking spaces.

It also rides on a 2995mm wheelbase with a compact 11-metre turning circle to enable easy manoeuvering in confined spaces. And the PV5’s 1899mm height is almost 100mm lower than the HiAce, providing more clearance in height restricted areas like multi-storey car parks which is handy if carrying loads on the roof.

The front motor/front-wheel drive layout also eliminates the need for a driveshaft to the rear wheels, resulting in a conspicuously low floor height of only 419mm for easier loading and generous internal load height (see Practicality).

You’ve got to hand it to BMW.

The new nose and triangular tail-light treatment on the 2013-vintage midsection look as if they were designed to all go together back in the day.

You could even mistake it for the previous Cooper EV, though side-by-side that’s less likely, since the latter ditches the upright windscreen for a more raked item, clamshell bonnet opening, horizontal bumper shutlines for shorter and more-angled ones, plastic wheel arch surrounds and pull-out door handles for flush units.

The wheels are further apart, the overhangs shorter and the lower-side surfacing broken up by an artful sheetmetal crease.

The overall length at 3876mm, width at 1744mm and height at 1432mm have increased by 55mm, 17mm and 18mm respectively over the old model, but the 2495mm wheelbase stays the same.

And that’s not all.

Its 1910kg kerb weight is relatively light for a full-electric van which when deducted from its 2650kg GVM results in a 740kg payload. It’s also rated to tow up to 750kg of (braked or unbraked) trailer which although small compared to diesel rivals is probably not a high priority for electric van buyers.

The cargo bay’s key dimensions are 2250mm in length and 1565mm in width with its low floor allowing 1520mm of internal load height, which surprisingly is 180mm more than the HiAce and superior to Transit Custom and Staria Load despite the PV5’s lower roof height.

However, its compact dimensions also result in a cargo bay load volume of 4420 litres (VDA) or just over 4.4 cubic metres which is less than major mid-size rivals (typically around low-5.0 to high-6.0 cubic metres) so it may not suit buyers requiring higher load volumes.

Even so, according to our tape measure the PV5 should just fit a standard 1165mm-square Aussie pallet or two 800 x 1200mm Euro pallets with the rear pallet loaded longitudinally, given the relatively narrow 920mm floor width between the rear wheel housings dictated by the low-riding suspension architecture.

High build quality is evident throughout the solid-walled cargo bay which is accessed via sliding doors on each side with 775mm openings (so no side pallet loading) or from the rear through twin-swing doors with 180-degree opening to optimise forklift and loading dock access. No swing-up tailgate option is available.

The walls and doors are lined to mid-height and the load floor is equipped with eight sturdy load anchorage points. There’s also bright LED lighting and a 3.6kW V2L three-pin wall socket behind a neat sliding cover.

Abundant storage is evident throughout the well-designed cabin, including three tiers in each door with the largest central bins providing twin bottle holders.

The dash has a sizeable clamshell-lid compartment ahead of the driver with its own USB-C port, along with a glove box and central fascia offering two more USB-C ports, A 12V socket, wireless phone charging and a large drawer at floor level.

There’s also storage compartments under each seat and lidded underfloor storage in both footwells, plus a sizeable console between the seats containing two cup holders and a large bin. An unusual but welcome inclusion is bins behind each seat, which are ideal for storing items like the portable AC charger/cable bag.

The previous Mini 3DR featured a messy and quite overbearing dashboard design from 2013 that’s aged about as well as Robin Thicke’s videos from that year.

In contrast, the new model's is far simpler and less protruding, dramatically boosting the sense of space and light.

That said, all four occupants still sit low, with an upright windscreen ahead and beside high window sills. There’s an oversized, circular screen in the middle of a pared-back dash and a neat row of toggle switches below. It’s still pure Mini in theme.

As before, there’s enough space for even the tallest people up front, reflecting the British icon’s German packaging, with plenty of head and legroom, as well as ample width. It’s only when you jump from the EV to the petrol Cooper that you realise this feels noticeably narrower.

All Coopers regardless of fuel share the 240mm (9.4-inch) central OLED display. It might seem like visual overload at first glance, with so much going on, but after a brief period of familiarisation, the touchscreen becomes a cinch to decipher and navigate. The colour-coded driving modes, pleasingly slick screen swipe action and ultra-crisp graphics are especially noteworthy.

Revel, too, in the twist engine starter and toggle gear selector actions, that also save space and are super natural to operate. This is button-lite dashboard de-cluttering done right.

As with the previous model, the Mini’s driving position has you sitting upright, but it’s comfortable enough on the S’ sports seats we sampled this on, and everything is within reach. There’s sufficient storage. The ambient mood lighting is fun. And kudos for the deployment of animal-free materials. In fact, the Cooper’s fresh textures are quite remarkable.

We’re less fond of the glass roof with no sunlight block; there are blind spots due to the thick side pillars; and some of the lower-placed plastics do not seem $60K’s worth in a supermini this expensive.

Rear-seat access isn’t graceful, with a narrow aperture to squeeze past and a slow-moving electric seat to wait for, but that should surprise nobody given this car’s size. There’s enough space for two adults and not much else really. It’s pretty basic back there.

And even further back, Mini quotes just 210 litres VDA of luggage capacity, rising to 725L with the twin backrests dropped.

Don’t forget, though, that no spare wheel exists. Just an ever-fiddly tyre repair kit.

Meanwhile, at the other end of the Cooper…

For the duration of the original BMC/BLMC/Leyland/Austin/Rover era, the Mini was often the cheapest new car around. We’re talking bare bones motoring here, for the people.

Obviously, BMW bothers with no such democratic notion today.

The new Cooper comes in two models differentiated by engine size – the C with a 115kW 1.5-litre three-cylinder turbo and S with a 150kW 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo. Both are carryover units, and automatic only, sadly. 

Which helps explain why the base C Core starts from a steep $41,990 (all prices are before on-road costs). Much the same car cost $10K less just five years ago.

The Core includes climate control air-conditioning, an OLED circular touchscreen, a head-up display, a reverse camera, parking sensors, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, DAB+ digital radio, a smartphone charger, ambient lighting, a heated steering wheel, 17-inch alloy wheels and a basic cruise control set-up.

You’ll need to step up to the $44,990 Cooper C Classic for adaptive cruise control, a surround-view monitor, interior camera, 'augmented reality' satellite navigation, front seat warmers, seven rather than four colour choices, 18-inch alloys, a glass roof and more.

'Sun Protection Glazing' for the latter, along with a Harmon/Kardon premium audio system, John Cooper Works (JCW) sports seats with electric adjustment and memory, fancier interior materials and a broader palette of options are part of the Cooper C Flavoured package from $47,990. 

Meanwhile, the more-powerful Cooper S auto bypasses Core and kicks off with the Classic from $49,990, Favoured from $52,990 and the JCW Sport from $54,990.

The latter includes a JCW body/interior styling, steering wheel and stripes, along with adaptive suspension, paddle shifters and uprated brakes.

Going for the 5DR Cooper equivalents adds $2000 to the price.

All up, then, with drive-away pricing, the Cooper before options is priced between $47,000 and $63,000.

Obvious rivals are the Audi A1, Fiat/Abarth 500, Citroen C3 and even Suzuki Swift Sport, though alternatives with a retro bent and driver focus might also be in BMW’s crosshairs, including the Toyota GR86, Subaru BRZ, Mazda MX-5, Ford Mustang and Nissan Z.

The PV5 Cargo is powered by a front-mounted electric motor that produces up to 120kW of power and 250Nm of torque, which drives the front wheels through a single-speed automatic transmission.

This drivetrain offers three selectable drive modes comprising ‘Normal’, ‘Eco’ and ‘Snow’ plus adjustment of regenerative braking intensity/battery replenishment using the steering wheel-mounted paddles.

These include levels from L1 to L3 topped by the premium ‘i-Pedal’ setting, which allows convenient one-pedal driving that makes the brake pedal largely redundant.

Compared to the previous model, the new one brings more performance to the table.

The Cooper C uses BMW’s 1.5-litre three-cylinder turbo petrol engine, and pumps out 115kW of power at 6500rpm and 230Nm of torque from 1500rpm to 4600rpm. Previously it was 100kW and 220kW.

With a power-to-weight ratio of 91.3kW per tonne, it’s enough for a zero to 100km/h time of 7.7 seconds (previously 8.1s), on the way to a 225km/h top speed.

Mounted transversely, it drives the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT).

It’s still difficult to imagine Mini buyers not outraged by the manual’s disappearance. But don’t worry. There’s always the Suzuki Swift.

Stepping up to the Cooper S, you’ll find a 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol unit delivering a useful 150kW at 6500rpm and 300Nm between 1450rpm and 4500rpm. It was 141kW/280Nm in the old version.

Boasting 117kW/tonne, this one needs just 6.6s to 100km/h and can achieve a 242km/h V-max.

Now known as the FAAR platform, it is an evolution of BMW’s UKL (Untere Klasse, German for ‘lower class’) modular architecture that debuted in the previous model.

Suspension is via MacPherson-style struts up front and a multi-link independent rear end.

The PV5 Cargo is equipped with a lithium-ion NCM (Nickel Cobalt Manganese) 71.2kWh long-range propulsion battery mounted under the load floor which Kia claims has (WLTP) combined average consumption of 19.1kWh/100km and up to 416km of driving range.

Only the much higher priced VW ID Buzz Cargo has a longer range and not by much (431km). All other full-electric vans have ranges starting with a two or three.

The PV5 uses a Type 2 CCS charge port capable of AC and DC charging. Kia claims charging from 10-100 per cent in around six hours 30 minutes using an 11kW AC wall-box, which is ideal for overnight charging. Alternatively, 10-80 per cent with a 50kW DC fast charger takes around one hour, which drops to only half an hour with a 350kW DC charger.

Our test vehicle had 100 per cent charge at the start of our week-long test, during which we initially drove 197km unladen in busy metro traffic with 44 per cent charge and 199km range remaining. Using the portable AC charger/cable with three-pin domestic plug, we charged at home which provided enough battery top-up to cover the remainder of the test.

Our total test distance was 293km which including more than 50km hauling its maximum payload. Even so, we managed average consumption of 17.4kWh/100km across the week which was lower than Kia’s official figure and no doubt enhanced by consistent use of either (L3) high regen or one-pedal settings.

So, based on our test figures, Kia’s claim of up to 416km from a single charge is credible and impressive efficiency for a full-electric van in real-world use.

The new Coopers enjoy a drink more than before. By almost half a litre per 100km more, in fact.

Rated at Euro6 and running on 95 RON premium unleaded petrol, the Cooper C averages 6.0L/100km (F56: 5.6), while the more-powerful Cooper S ups that to 6.3L/100km (F56: 5.8).

In terms of carbon dioxide emissions averages, this translates to 137 and 145 grams per kilometre, respectively. With a 44L fuel tank, the potential range-average is up to around 730km.

The cabin ergonomics are excellent even for tall people, as they provide a car-like driving position enhanced by numerous comfort features including a fold-down inboard armrest, power adjustable lumbar support, large left footrest and well-placed padded elbow rests on the doors.

There’s also ample headroom and the flat-bottom steering wheel ensures easy boarding with plenty of torso room. Glazed inserts within the windscreen pillars combined with a low beltline and large door windows provide a bright and airy ambience with excellent driver visibility.

Despite being a solid-walled van with no rear vision for its central mirror (it’s only fitted to meet ADRs) all-around vision for the driver is excellent thanks to large door mirrors and numerous active safety systems including multiple parking sensors and camera monitoring.

Kia’s local ride/handling team has done a commendable job in combining load-carrying practicality with a smooth and supple ride, car-like handling and nice steering feel which provides a level of driver enjoyment not usually associated with commercial vans.

We found the i-Pedal mode appealing given its ability to require only one-pedal driving most of the time while optimising battery charge/driving range.

Although the PV5’s 120kW/250Nm outputs are modest on paper, its relatively light kerb weight combined with near instant torque reaction from its electric motor results in energetic response from standing starts, with 0-100km/h acceleration that matches its diesel rivals.

It’s also very quiet thanks to its electric drivetrain combined with the cabin bulkhead which largely insulates the driver from the cargo bay’s rear tyre noise, which is typically the loudest noise path in commercial vans.

To test its GVM rating we used a forklift (fitted with long tynes) to load 650kg into the front of the cargo bay through the rear doors, which with driver equalled a total payload of 740kg that was right on its payload limit. The rear suspension only compressed 33mm under this weight.

Acceleration was slightly subdued as you'd expect but more than adequate for keeping this big payload moving without feeling sluggish. Handling response was barely affected, with the supple rear suspension ensuring no bottoming out over bumps.

Average energy consumption displayed on-screen barely increased under this load which was hauled mostly on metro roads. However, greater increases could occur if carrying similar loads in hilly terrain, strong headwinds, towing etc.

Overall, the PV5 Cargo is hard to fault from a driver’s point of view apart from the cabin’s climate settings being controlled by relatively small central touchscreen prompts, which can be tricky at times for large fingers to operate while driving compared to physical buttons and dials.

So far, similarities in design, packaging, dashboard presentation and suspension layout suggest that the electric Cooper and petrol Cooper would be like fraternal twins from behind the wheel.

But in reality, the petrol-powered Mini feels much the same as the previous model, whilst the EV is more akin to what we secretly wish the fantasy Tesla Model 1 would be like. From the future.

Now, we never had a chance to drive the Cooper C, but the closely-related (though larger and heavier) Countryman C sibling – complete with the same powertrain – proved to be a willing and feisty performer once on the go, after what seemed like protracted turbo and DCT lag.

Why the hell can’t Mini just offer manuals again?

The Cooper S, meanwhile, completely lived up to brand expectations, with the familiar, revvy snarl of BMW’s sophisticated 2.0-litre four-pot turbo providing punchy of throttle response and effortless cruising capability, though there’s still some initial acceleration hesitation.

Thankfully, the Mini’s steering is always alert, offering precision and agility by the bucketful, backed up a chassis that seems permanently glued to the road – even in the wet and wintry conditions we had to endure.

Yet, other than a ride quality that seemed better than any previous-gen Mini we’ve ever encountered and so genuinely surprised us, the Cooper S seemed a little… stale compared to the glorious SE EV we had just (reluctantly) surrendered.

A bit like having a favourite dish as leftovers for two nights in a row, it felt a bit passé in 2024, even when surrounded by that dazzling OLED dash and glitzy ambient lighting.

In every important metric – performance, handling, roadholding, ride quality, packaging and (particularly) refinement – the battery-powered Cooper is the more vibrant and alive option. And truer to the vision of the original’s creator, Alec Issigonis, as a result.

There are no crash-test ratings for the 2024 Cooper at the time of publishing.

The previous F56 managed four out of five stars with ANCAP. 

On the driver-assist tech front are AEB, lane departure warning, lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert with braking, rear-collision prevention, driver-attention monitor, tyre-pressure monitor, auto high beams and an exit warning.

However, at the time of publishing, no AEB operating parameter data was available.

Other safety features include adaptive cruise control with automatic speed-limit assistance from Classic-grade and up, anti-lock brakes, electronic stability and traction controls and nine airbags (front/side/head and interaction centre-front airbags).

A pair of child seat tether latches and twin ISOFIX latches are fitted within the rear seats.

Comes standard with a seven years/150,000km warranty plus a separate warranty of the same duration covering the propulsion battery. Roadside assist for up to eight years is also available if serviced at an authorised Kia dealer.

Scheduled servicing is every 24 months/30,000km whichever occurs first, with Kia offering a pre-paid service plan covering the first four scheduled services up to four years/120,000km which totals $2246 or an average of $562 per service. This is one of the strongest warranty/service packages offered for a full-electric van, backed by a national network of more than 150 Kia dealers across all states and territories.

Like all Minis, the Cooper comes with a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and five years of roadside assistance.

There are no set service intervals, as the car’s onboard computer will alert the driver based on condition and wear/tear. That said, we recommend going every 12 months or 10,000km, just to be on the safe side.

Mini also promotes several prepaid service plans on its Australian website. According to BMW, “… both new and used Mini owners can upgrade to a MINI Service Inclusive plan for 5-years/80,000km (whichever comes first).”