Kia Pv5 vs Toyota BZ4X

What's the difference?

The PV5 Cargo has been designed from scratch as a full-electric van resulting in a refined and sophisticated workhorse that's enjoyable to drive. Its modest cargo volume won’t suit all mid-size van buyers but its compact dimensions, clever cabin design with ample storage, zero 'tailpipe' emissions, 3.6kW V2L practicality and long service intervals should make it well suited to a wide variety of working roles.

Is the bZ4X Touring the right Toyota for this moment in time or too little too late for the brand to play catch-up to its EV rivals?

The good news for Toyota is that it isn’t too late, at all. The Touring expands the appeal of the bZ4X, metaphorically and literally, and certainly the sales trajectory in 2026 suggests buyers are warming to Toyota’s electric future.

However, it remains a more expensive proposition for its size and the Touring doesn’t really make it stand out amongst the crowd that includes the popular BYD Sealion 7 and Tesla Model Y. It’s unfamiliar territory for Toyota, but it didn’t become the automotive juggernaut it is by giving up, so there is every reason to think the bZ4X duo will chip away at the EV sales leaders.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The PV5 Cargo’s exterior styling is clean and boxy with a practical appearance that embraces Kia’s signature ‘Tiger Face’ design language, including distinctive LED daytime running lights that extend into the windscreen pillars. Its slippery aerodynamic drag co-efficient of just 0.286 Cd would be impressive for a passenger car and outstanding for a commercial van in optimising energy efficiency (see driving range).

The minimalist cabin design is spacious and practical with a fabric-trimmed pair of bucket seats and a dash that’s free of protrusions to allow drivers ‘walk through’ access to the passenger door, which is appealing for delivery work.

The PV5’s compact 4695mm overall length is not only more than half a metre shorter than the Toyota HiAce but also slightly shorter than a Peugeot Partner LWB small van, so it makes light work of accessing tight parking spaces.

It also rides on a 2995mm wheelbase with a compact 11-metre turning circle to enable easy manoeuvering in confined spaces. And the PV5’s 1899mm height is almost 100mm lower than the HiAce, providing more clearance in height restricted areas like multi-storey car parks which is handy if carrying loads on the roof.

The front motor/front-wheel drive layout also eliminates the need for a driveshaft to the rear wheels, resulting in a conspicuously low floor height of only 419mm for easier loading and generous internal load height (see Practicality).

What stands out about the design of the bZ4X Touring is the fact it is a bZ4X. Unlike Subaru, which opted to position its bZ4X twins, the Solterra and Trailseeker, as separate models, Toyota has stuck with the single nameplate and a very similar look.

At the front the Touring looks almost identical to the SUV and it’s only at the back where things deviate notably. Toyota has stretched the Touring by 140mm and redesigned it to have a more vertical tailgate.

To further differentiate between the two bZ4X offerings, the Touring gets unique 20-inch alloy wheels, as well as front and rear skid plates, roof rails (which can take up to 80kg of weight), matt finished wheel arches, a contrasting bonnet insert plus a rear window wiper.

Inside the design is carried over unchanged, which means the same interior that has Toyota elements but also some Subaru influence and a bit of EV differentiation. So it doesn’t look exactly like what you expect from Toyota, but it’s still clearly in the Toyota family.

Its 1910kg kerb weight is relatively light for a full-electric van which when deducted from its 2650kg GVM results in a 740kg payload. It’s also rated to tow up to 750kg of (braked or unbraked) trailer which although small compared to diesel rivals is probably not a high priority for electric van buyers.

The cargo bay’s key dimensions are 2250mm in length and 1565mm in width with its low floor allowing 1520mm of internal load height, which surprisingly is 180mm more than the HiAce and superior to Transit Custom and Staria Load despite the PV5’s lower roof height.

However, its compact dimensions also result in a cargo bay load volume of 4420 litres (VDA) or just over 4.4 cubic metres which is less than major mid-size rivals (typically around low-5.0 to high-6.0 cubic metres) so it may not suit buyers requiring higher load volumes.

Even so, according to our tape measure the PV5 should just fit a standard 1165mm-square Aussie pallet or two 800 x 1200mm Euro pallets with the rear pallet loaded longitudinally, given the relatively narrow 920mm floor width between the rear wheel housings dictated by the low-riding suspension architecture.

High build quality is evident throughout the solid-walled cargo bay which is accessed via sliding doors on each side with 775mm openings (so no side pallet loading) or from the rear through twin-swing doors with 180-degree opening to optimise forklift and loading dock access. No swing-up tailgate option is available.

The walls and doors are lined to mid-height and the load floor is equipped with eight sturdy load anchorage points. There’s also bright LED lighting and a 3.6kW V2L three-pin wall socket behind a neat sliding cover.

Abundant storage is evident throughout the well-designed cabin, including three tiers in each door with the largest central bins providing twin bottle holders.

The dash has a sizeable clamshell-lid compartment ahead of the driver with its own USB-C port, along with a glove box and central fascia offering two more USB-C ports, A 12V socket, wireless phone charging and a large drawer at floor level.

There’s also storage compartments under each seat and lidded underfloor storage in both footwells, plus a sizeable console between the seats containing two cup holders and a large bin. An unusual but welcome inclusion is bins behind each seat, which are ideal for storing items like the portable AC charger/cable bag.

One of the most notable examples of this is the set-up of the steering wheel and instrument display. The digital display screen is set far back on the dash and the wheel has a small diameter so you look over it rather than through the rim; similar to Peugeot’s polarising ergonomics. It’s not a deal-breaker, but it is a stand out feature of the interior. 

Thankfully, while there is a 14-inch multimedia touchscreen, unlike so many other modern EVs there are plenty of physical buttons and dials, too. Not to sound like an old man, but these are simply better in my opinion as they are easier to use, especially on the move.

In terms of space, the Touring feels roomy for a mid-size SUV, but not as spacious as some of its rivals. In the second row headroom is good and there is enough knee and foot room for two adults to sit in relative comfort.

The rear seat occupants are well catered for with their own air-conditioning, heated outboard seats and two USB-C ports.

The biggest practicality boost for the Touring is the boot volume. By stretching the length, Toyota has added another 151 litres of cargo space, so the total volume is now 603 litres, which is a generous amount of room for a mid-size SUV and ideal for those looking to load up with luggage for a road trip.

In keeping with the slow and steady approach, Toyota is offering a single variant of the Touring to complement the existing bZ4X model.

Priced from $69,990, before on-road costs, it is a $2000 premium over the standard AWD bZ4X, but it’s still $5000 less than the original starting price for the SUV before its recent price cut.

Based on size and price, the Touring positions itself as rival to everything from the BYD Sealion 7 to the Zeekr 7X and a wide variety in between including the Kia EV5, MG MGS6, Tesla Model Y, Volkswagen ID.4 and, of course, the Subaru Trailseeker - with which it shares its underpinnings (as both the Solterra/Trailseeker and bZ4X pair were co-developed between the two Japanese brands).

The singular bZ4X Touring comes equipped with dual-zone climate control, heated and ventilated front seats, a digital rear-vision mirror, a fixed panoramic sunroof, dual wireless phone chargers and a 14-inch touchscreen with a nine-speaker JBL premium audio system.

While that’s a generous amount of equipment, the Toyota doesn’t stand out in terms of value, with the Model Y range starting at $58,900, Zeekr’s 7X from $57,900 and the Sealion 7 from $54,990.

In short, the mid-size electric SUV market is getting more and more competitive and Toyota will need to work hard for every single sale.

The PV5 Cargo is powered by a front-mounted electric motor that produces up to 120kW of power and 250Nm of torque, which drives the front wheels through a single-speed automatic transmission.

This drivetrain offers three selectable drive modes comprising ‘Normal’, ‘Eco’ and ‘Snow’ plus adjustment of regenerative braking intensity/battery replenishment using the steering wheel-mounted paddles.

These include levels from L1 to L3 topped by the premium ‘i-Pedal’ setting, which allows convenient one-pedal driving that makes the brake pedal largely redundant.

One of the biggest differences between the regular bZ4X and the Touring is the single powertrain option. While the standard bZ4X can be had at a cheaper price with a single-motor, front-wheel drive set-up, the Touring is exclusively available with the dual-motor, all-wheel drive powertrain.

This is good for 280kW of power, which is very punchy for a Toyota mid-size SUV, and is enough for it to take just 4.4 second to sprint from 0-100km/h, which is downright rapid.

The PV5 Cargo is equipped with a lithium-ion NCM (Nickel Cobalt Manganese) 71.2kWh long-range propulsion battery mounted under the load floor which Kia claims has (WLTP) combined average consumption of 19.1kWh/100km and up to 416km of driving range.

Only the much higher priced VW ID Buzz Cargo has a longer range and not by much (431km). All other full-electric vans have ranges starting with a two or three.

The PV5 uses a Type 2 CCS charge port capable of AC and DC charging. Kia claims charging from 10-100 per cent in around six hours 30 minutes using an 11kW AC wall-box, which is ideal for overnight charging. Alternatively, 10-80 per cent with a 50kW DC fast charger takes around one hour, which drops to only half an hour with a 350kW DC charger.

Our test vehicle had 100 per cent charge at the start of our week-long test, during which we initially drove 197km unladen in busy metro traffic with 44 per cent charge and 199km range remaining. Using the portable AC charger/cable with three-pin domestic plug, we charged at home which provided enough battery top-up to cover the remainder of the test.

Our total test distance was 293km which including more than 50km hauling its maximum payload. Even so, we managed average consumption of 17.4kWh/100km across the week which was lower than Kia’s official figure and no doubt enhanced by consistent use of either (L3) high regen or one-pedal settings.

So, based on our test figures, Kia’s claim of up to 416km from a single charge is credible and impressive efficiency for a full-electric van in real-world use.

The bZ4X Touring is fitted with a 74.7kWh battery, which is enough for a claimed range of 488km. That’s a reasonable distance, on par with the BYD Sealion 7, Kia EV5 and MGS6 but isn’t class-leading. It also probably looks a bit short on paper as Toyota is pushing this as "purpose-built for long distance touring."

However, the Touring wins some points back with its 1500W inverter that provides vehicle-to-load (V2L) charging, which not all models in this segment offer.

Charging maxes out at 150kW DC and 22kW AC, but Toyota says with the DC charger it can take just 28 minutes to recharge the battery from 10 to 80 per cent.

The cabin ergonomics are excellent even for tall people, as they provide a car-like driving position enhanced by numerous comfort features including a fold-down inboard armrest, power adjustable lumbar support, large left footrest and well-placed padded elbow rests on the doors.

There’s also ample headroom and the flat-bottom steering wheel ensures easy boarding with plenty of torso room. Glazed inserts within the windscreen pillars combined with a low beltline and large door windows provide a bright and airy ambience with excellent driver visibility.

Despite being a solid-walled van with no rear vision for its central mirror (it’s only fitted to meet ADRs) all-around vision for the driver is excellent thanks to large door mirrors and numerous active safety systems including multiple parking sensors and camera monitoring.

Kia’s local ride/handling team has done a commendable job in combining load-carrying practicality with a smooth and supple ride, car-like handling and nice steering feel which provides a level of driver enjoyment not usually associated with commercial vans.

We found the i-Pedal mode appealing given its ability to require only one-pedal driving most of the time while optimising battery charge/driving range.

Although the PV5’s 120kW/250Nm outputs are modest on paper, its relatively light kerb weight combined with near instant torque reaction from its electric motor results in energetic response from standing starts, with 0-100km/h acceleration that matches its diesel rivals.

It’s also very quiet thanks to its electric drivetrain combined with the cabin bulkhead which largely insulates the driver from the cargo bay’s rear tyre noise, which is typically the loudest noise path in commercial vans.

To test its GVM rating we used a forklift (fitted with long tynes) to load 650kg into the front of the cargo bay through the rear doors, which with driver equalled a total payload of 740kg that was right on its payload limit. The rear suspension only compressed 33mm under this weight.

Acceleration was slightly subdued as you'd expect but more than adequate for keeping this big payload moving without feeling sluggish. Handling response was barely affected, with the supple rear suspension ensuring no bottoming out over bumps.

Average energy consumption displayed on-screen barely increased under this load which was hauled mostly on metro roads. However, greater increases could occur if carrying similar loads in hilly terrain, strong headwinds, towing etc.

Overall, the PV5 Cargo is hard to fault from a driver’s point of view apart from the cabin’s climate settings being controlled by relatively small central touchscreen prompts, which can be tricky at times for large fingers to operate while driving compared to physical buttons and dials.

While the dual-motor powertrain provides serious performance when you put your foot down, that’s not really the point of a mid-size electric SUV aimed at family buyers. Sure, it’s a nice-to-have, but it shouldn’t define the driving experience of the bZ4X Touring.

Not surprisingly, it’s very similar to drive to the standard bZ4X and that’s no bad thing. The steering is quick and direct and coupled with the performance it means the Touring does feel a step above the average petrol- or diesel-powered SUV in terms of responsiveness.

The ride is pretty good for such a heavy vehicle. It doesn’t ride like a magic carpet but nor is it harsh and uncomfortable. It will crash over the occasional sharper bump, but overall Toyota has done a nice job on the chassis tuning to keep a family buyer happy.

What isn’t so good is the amount of noise that leaks into the cabin. During our drive on the open road we couldn’t help but notice the significant amount of tyre roar and wind noise at speeds above 70km/h.

But what stands out most about the driving experience in many respects is the regenerative braking, which is much more subtle than rival EVs. It lacks the one-pedal driving character of other EVs and that makes for an easier transition for those coming to electric motoring for the first time. On the flip side, it means less energy recovered at times, which means the bZ4X could be more efficient.

Safety is one area where the bZ4X Touring and Toyota do stand out in the electric SUV contest. As we have written many times in recent years, the flood of new active safety technology has led to some, frankly, annoying cars to drive. Over-reactive safety features can be distracting and diminish the driving experience and ultimately become so frustrating many owners will turn them off.

Toyota, however, has used its years of experience to ensure the safety systems in the Touring work more seamlessly. There are plenty of systems, too, with autonomous emergency braking (AEB), rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, driver attention monitoring,  blind-spot monitoring and traffic sign recognition all included.

During our test drive the driver attention monitor only intervened when needed and otherwise the car only reacted when it absolutely had to rather than being too sensitive. It’s part of the reason why the bZ4X carries a price premium, because you’re paying for Toyota’s experience.

In addition to those active safety features the Touring comes with eight airbags and surround view cameras, plus connected services with SOS emergency calling, plus automatic collision notification and vehicle insights.

ANCAP awarded the bZ4X SUV a maximum five-star rating based on its pre-2026 testing protocols, and while it is untested, given the similarities between the two cars and historical precedence there’s no reason to anticipate a different score.

Comes standard with a seven years/150,000km warranty plus a separate warranty of the same duration covering the propulsion battery. Roadside assist for up to eight years is also available if serviced at an authorised Kia dealer.

Scheduled servicing is every 24 months/30,000km whichever occurs first, with Kia offering a pre-paid service plan covering the first four scheduled services up to four years/120,000km which totals $2246 or an average of $562 per service. This is one of the strongest warranty/service packages offered for a full-electric van, backed by a national network of more than 150 Kia dealers across all states and territories.

A key selling point for any Toyota, but especially one with new(-ish) technology, is that with 270 dealers around the country, Toyota has one of the biggest footprints.

The Touring is covered by Toyota’s standard five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, which is fine but is increasingly looking off-the-pace compared to a growing list of rivals with seven or more years of coverage.

On the plus side the bZ4X delivers on the promise of cheaper EV servicing, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km (whichever comes first) with each visit capped at $190 for the first five years.