Kia Pv5 vs Mitsubishi Triton

What's the difference?

The PV5 Cargo has been designed from scratch as a full-electric van resulting in a refined and sophisticated workhorse that's enjoyable to drive. Its modest cargo volume won’t suit all mid-size van buyers but its compact dimensions, clever cabin design with ample storage, zero 'tailpipe' emissions, 3.6kW V2L practicality and long service intervals should make it well suited to a wide variety of working roles.

Apart from its distracting driver attention monitor, we can't see any major flaws that would detract from this vehicle’s comfort, practicality and performance when serving as either a utilitarian 4x4 workhorse or back-to-basics 4x4 dual cab for adventures off the beaten track.

The PV5 Cargo’s exterior styling is clean and boxy with a practical appearance that embraces Kia’s signature ‘Tiger Face’ design language, including distinctive LED daytime running lights that extend into the windscreen pillars. Its slippery aerodynamic drag co-efficient of just 0.286 Cd would be impressive for a passenger car and outstanding for a commercial van in optimising energy efficiency (see driving range).

The minimalist cabin design is spacious and practical with a fabric-trimmed pair of bucket seats and a dash that’s free of protrusions to allow drivers ‘walk through’ access to the passenger door, which is appealing for delivery work.

The PV5’s compact 4695mm overall length is not only more than half a metre shorter than the Toyota HiAce but also slightly shorter than a Peugeot Partner LWB small van, so it makes light work of accessing tight parking spaces.

It also rides on a 2995mm wheelbase with a compact 11-metre turning circle to enable easy manoeuvering in confined spaces. And the PV5’s 1899mm height is almost 100mm lower than the HiAce, providing more clearance in height restricted areas like multi-storey car parks which is handy if carrying loads on the roof.

The front motor/front-wheel drive layout also eliminates the need for a driveshaft to the rear wheels, resulting in a conspicuously low floor height of only 419mm for easier loading and generous internal load height (see Practicality).

Our test vehicle rides on a compact 3130mm wheelbase and is 1865mm wide and 1795mm tall, which combined with a 12.4-metre turning circle makes it agile and easy to manoeuvre both on and off-road.

Speaking of which, its all-terrain credentials include 228mm of ground clearance, a useful 30.4 degrees approach angle (without bull-bar) and 23.4 degrees ramp breakover angle, with the departure angle dependent on the type of tray fitted. These numbers would be more than adequate for accessing rugged worksites.

Its front suspension is double-wishbone with coil-springs, paired with a robust leaf-spring live rear axle. Brakes are front discs and rear drums and it has electric power-assistance for the rack and pinion steering.

Looks are subjective of course but we reckon it has a robust and purposeful appearance in cab-chassis form, particularly with the accessories fitted to our example.

Chrome is all but extinct in its predominantly grey interior. However, hard surfaces on the centre console and door-pulls have a synthetic carbon-fibre finish, which adds a touch of style to a low-maintenance cabin that won’t get trashed by spilled coffee or muddy boots.

You also won’t find fancy features like digital instruments (it has analogue speedo/tacho) or an electronic handbrake (this one’s the good old manual lever). Plus there’s physical dials for audio volume/tuning and ‘piano key’ buttons for the cabin’s climate control, which ensures no distracting touchscreen prompts when driving.

Its 1910kg kerb weight is relatively light for a full-electric van which when deducted from its 2650kg GVM results in a 740kg payload. It’s also rated to tow up to 750kg of (braked or unbraked) trailer which although small compared to diesel rivals is probably not a high priority for electric van buyers.

The cargo bay’s key dimensions are 2250mm in length and 1565mm in width with its low floor allowing 1520mm of internal load height, which surprisingly is 180mm more than the HiAce and superior to Transit Custom and Staria Load despite the PV5’s lower roof height.

However, its compact dimensions also result in a cargo bay load volume of 4420 litres (VDA) or just over 4.4 cubic metres which is less than major mid-size rivals (typically around low-5.0 to high-6.0 cubic metres) so it may not suit buyers requiring higher load volumes.

Even so, according to our tape measure the PV5 should just fit a standard 1165mm-square Aussie pallet or two 800 x 1200mm Euro pallets with the rear pallet loaded longitudinally, given the relatively narrow 920mm floor width between the rear wheel housings dictated by the low-riding suspension architecture.

High build quality is evident throughout the solid-walled cargo bay which is accessed via sliding doors on each side with 775mm openings (so no side pallet loading) or from the rear through twin-swing doors with 180-degree opening to optimise forklift and loading dock access. No swing-up tailgate option is available.

The walls and doors are lined to mid-height and the load floor is equipped with eight sturdy load anchorage points. There’s also bright LED lighting and a 3.6kW V2L three-pin wall socket behind a neat sliding cover.

Abundant storage is evident throughout the well-designed cabin, including three tiers in each door with the largest central bins providing twin bottle holders.

The dash has a sizeable clamshell-lid compartment ahead of the driver with its own USB-C port, along with a glove box and central fascia offering two more USB-C ports, A 12V socket, wireless phone charging and a large drawer at floor level.

There’s also storage compartments under each seat and lidded underfloor storage in both footwells, plus a sizeable console between the seats containing two cup holders and a large bin. An unusual but welcome inclusion is bins behind each seat, which are ideal for storing items like the portable AC charger/cable bag.

With a kerb weight of only 1993kg (without tray) and 3200kg GVM, our test vehicle has a 1207kg payload rating. However, after you add the combined weight of its steel tray and other accessories (417kg), the payload rating is reduced by the same amount to 790kg. Even so, that still leaves a sizeable weight capacity for up to five tradies and their tools.

It’s also rated to tow up to 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 6250kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) the payload would have to be reduced by 450kg (from 790kg to 340kg) to avoid exceeding the GCM.

In real-world use it’s unlikely that many (if any) Triton owners would need to tow 3500kg but it’s important to be across these numbers to avoid overloading, which is dangerous and illegal.

The genuine accessory galvanised steel tray is internally 1650mm long and 1780mm wide. It has a robust checker-plate floor and a tube-frame front bulkhead with sturdy wire-mesh rear window protection.

There’s also swing-up load retainers on top of the tube-frame on each side, which when paired with the matching rear tube-rack accessory provides secure carrying space for extension ladders or long lengths of timber and PVC pipe/conduit.

There’s also external rope/strap rails along each side but like all steel trays we’ve come across there’s no internal load-anchorage points.

The driver and front passenger have access to a bottle holder and storage bin in each front door plus an overhead glasses holder and a large open compartment above the glovebox. The centre console offers more open storage plus two bottle/cupholders in the centre and a usefully-sized box at the back with a lid that doubles as a driver’s elbow rest.

The rear bench seat is comfortable and surprisingly spacious for tall people, given I’m 186cm and when seated behind the driver’s seat when set in my position, I have about 40mm of kneeroom and 60mm of headroom.

There’s also adequate head clearance for those seated in the slightly higher centre position, but the floor’s prominent transmission tunnel requires one boot either side and knees together between the front seat backrests.

And like all dual-cab utes short of a full-size US pick-up, rear shoulder room is squeezy for three adults, which is tolerable for short trips but a maximum of two adults would be ideal for longer drives.

Rear seat storage includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door plus pockets on each front seat backrest. The centre seat’s backrest also folds forward to serve as an armrest with dual bottle/cup-holders.

The bench seat’s base cushion is fixed, so unlike numerous rivals it can’t swing up and be stored vertically if more internal carrying space is required.

The Triton’s cab-chassis list pricing (without tray) starts at $34,490 for the GLX single-cab 4x2 manual and finishes at $61,540 for the premium GSR dual-cab 4x4 auto.

Our GLX test vehicle comes standard with a 2.4-litre twin-turbo four-cylinder diesel engine (shared by all Tritons) and optional six-speed automatic for $49,490. This pricing is competitive with base-model 4x4 dual-cab-chassis equivalents like the Toyota HiLux Workmate ($48,735), Ford Ranger XL ($49,230) and Isuzu D-Max SX ($51,200).

However, our example is loaded with numerous items from Mitsubishi’s genuine accessories range including a steel tray ($5775), rear ladder rack ($951.42), steel bull-bar ($4755), driving lights ($1295), side-steps ($1750) and 3500kg towing kit/electronic brake controller ($2370).

This desirable ensemble adds almost $17,000 to the price, which with on-road costs would be nudging $70K to drive away. So, buyers must keep their budgets in mind, as it’s easy to get carried away in genuine accessory lolly shops.

Our test vehicle comes standard with 17-inch steel wheels and 265/65R17 all-terrain tyres plus a full-size spare. It also has heavy-duty rear suspension and underbody armour, front/rear parking sensors, reversing camera, tyre-pressure monitoring and more.

The work-focused cabin has wipe-clean fabric seat trim and vinyl floors, power-adjustable driver’s lumbar support, twin 12-volt accessory sockets and USB ports, 7.0-inch driver’s instrument cluster and a four-speaker audio system controlled by a 9.0-inch multimedia screen with Android Auto, Apple CarPlay and Bluetooth connectivity.

The PV5 Cargo is powered by a front-mounted electric motor that produces up to 120kW of power and 250Nm of torque, which drives the front wheels through a single-speed automatic transmission.

This drivetrain offers three selectable drive modes comprising ‘Normal’, ‘Eco’ and ‘Snow’ plus adjustment of regenerative braking intensity/battery replenishment using the steering wheel-mounted paddles.

These include levels from L1 to L3 topped by the premium ‘i-Pedal’ setting, which allows convenient one-pedal driving that makes the brake pedal largely redundant.

The Triton’s 2.4-litre four-cylinder diesel engine is equipped with two turbochargers that work in sequence to boost efficiency, with the smaller one providing fast response at low rpm and the larger one optimising performance at higher rpm. The result is 150kW of power at 3500rpm and torque peaking at 470Nm between 1500-2750rpm, using AdBlue to minimise emissions.

It’s paired with a six-speed torque converter automatic that offers the choice of sequential manual shifting, which can be preferable when hauling and/or towing heavy loads, particularly in hilly terrain.

The 4x4 system is dual-range, part-time offering 2H (2WD High Range), 4H (4WD High Range) and 4L (4WD Low Range) controlled by a dial on the centre console. However, you need to step up to the GLX+ to get a rear diff-lock.

The PV5 Cargo is equipped with a lithium-ion NCM (Nickel Cobalt Manganese) 71.2kWh long-range propulsion battery mounted under the load floor which Kia claims has (WLTP) combined average consumption of 19.1kWh/100km and up to 416km of driving range.

Only the much higher priced VW ID Buzz Cargo has a longer range and not by much (431km). All other full-electric vans have ranges starting with a two or three.

The PV5 uses a Type 2 CCS charge port capable of AC and DC charging. Kia claims charging from 10-100 per cent in around six hours 30 minutes using an 11kW AC wall-box, which is ideal for overnight charging. Alternatively, 10-80 per cent with a 50kW DC fast charger takes around one hour, which drops to only half an hour with a 350kW DC charger.

Our test vehicle had 100 per cent charge at the start of our week-long test, during which we initially drove 197km unladen in busy metro traffic with 44 per cent charge and 199km range remaining. Using the portable AC charger/cable with three-pin domestic plug, we charged at home which provided enough battery top-up to cover the remainder of the test.

Our total test distance was 293km which including more than 50km hauling its maximum payload. Even so, we managed average consumption of 17.4kWh/100km across the week which was lower than Kia’s official figure and no doubt enhanced by consistent use of either (L3) high regen or one-pedal settings.

So, based on our test figures, Kia’s claim of up to 416km from a single charge is credible and impressive efficiency for a full-electric van in real-world use.

Mitsubishi claims official combined average consumption of 7.7L/100km but the dash display was showing 9.9 at the completion of our 316km test, which included the usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third of that distance was hauling its maximum payload.

Our own consumption figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, came in higher again at 10.7L/100km which is on the borderline of the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between manufacturer claims and real-world consumption.

So, based on our own numbers, the test vehicle should have a real-world driving range of around 700km from its 75-litre tank.

The cabin ergonomics are excellent even for tall people, as they provide a car-like driving position enhanced by numerous comfort features including a fold-down inboard armrest, power adjustable lumbar support, large left footrest and well-placed padded elbow rests on the doors.

There’s also ample headroom and the flat-bottom steering wheel ensures easy boarding with plenty of torso room. Glazed inserts within the windscreen pillars combined with a low beltline and large door windows provide a bright and airy ambience with excellent driver visibility.

Despite being a solid-walled van with no rear vision for its central mirror (it’s only fitted to meet ADRs) all-around vision for the driver is excellent thanks to large door mirrors and numerous active safety systems including multiple parking sensors and camera monitoring.

Kia’s local ride/handling team has done a commendable job in combining load-carrying practicality with a smooth and supple ride, car-like handling and nice steering feel which provides a level of driver enjoyment not usually associated with commercial vans.

We found the i-Pedal mode appealing given its ability to require only one-pedal driving most of the time while optimising battery charge/driving range.

Although the PV5’s 120kW/250Nm outputs are modest on paper, its relatively light kerb weight combined with near instant torque reaction from its electric motor results in energetic response from standing starts, with 0-100km/h acceleration that matches its diesel rivals.

It’s also very quiet thanks to its electric drivetrain combined with the cabin bulkhead which largely insulates the driver from the cargo bay’s rear tyre noise, which is typically the loudest noise path in commercial vans.

To test its GVM rating we used a forklift (fitted with long tynes) to load 650kg into the front of the cargo bay through the rear doors, which with driver equalled a total payload of 740kg that was right on its payload limit. The rear suspension only compressed 33mm under this weight.

Acceleration was slightly subdued as you'd expect but more than adequate for keeping this big payload moving without feeling sluggish. Handling response was barely affected, with the supple rear suspension ensuring no bottoming out over bumps.

Average energy consumption displayed on-screen barely increased under this load which was hauled mostly on metro roads. However, greater increases could occur if carrying similar loads in hilly terrain, strong headwinds, towing etc.

Overall, the PV5 Cargo is hard to fault from a driver’s point of view apart from the cabin’s climate settings being controlled by relatively small central touchscreen prompts, which can be tricky at times for large fingers to operate while driving compared to physical buttons and dials.

Large assist-handles on the A (and B) pillars, combined with the accessory side-steps on our example, make it easy to climb aboard and find a comfortable driving position.

The unladen ride is firm, as you’d expect given its 6.0-tonne-plus GCM rating, but it’s still supple enough to soak up the bumps without the harsh kidney-belting ride suffered in some cab-chassis one-tonners we’ve tested.

This is no doubt helped by the accessories fitted, which provide more than 400kg of additional sprung weight to engage the heavy-duty rear springs and improve the ride quality. That’s something to keep in mind if you often drive unladen.

The steering is firmly weighted and the brakes have good response, with the rear drums offering a terrier-like bite when the manual handbrake is applied on steep hills with a heavy load on board.

The four-cylinder 2.4-litre diesel, with its sequential turbocharging and strong outputs, provides energetic all-round performance with efficient gearing that ensures its operating within its peak torque band most of the time.

However, at highway speeds it does tend to hold top gear for too long, when the engine has dropped below 1500rpm and is clearly wanting a downshift.

To test its payload rating, we strapped 650kg on the tray which when combined with accessories and crew was right on the weight limit. The stout rear springs compressed only 25mm under this load, leaving ample bump-stop clearance that assured there was no bottoming-out on our test route.

The Triton handled this task with competence, maintaining good performance and chassis stability. It easily hauled this load up our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set climb at 60km/h, with the six-speed auto self-shifting down to third gear and 2500rpm which was comfortably within its peak torque band. Engine braking on the way down was also commendable.

Our only gripe is the driver distraction monitoring system which is still too reactive in certain situations, like scratching an itch below my eye even though I was looking straight ahead while doing it. Even though Mitsubishi has tried to improve this system, it needs more refinement, as it detracts from an otherwise positive driving experience.

The Triton comes with a five-star ANCAP rating (tested 2024) and a suite of passive and active features highlighted by eight airbags (including side-curtains), auto emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian/cyclist detection and junction assist, rear AEB when reversing, front/rear cross-traffic alert, traffic sign recognition, adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping, front/rear parking sensors, reversing camera, trailer stability assist and lots more. Rear seat has ISOFIX child-seat anchorages on the two outer rear seating positions and three top-tethers.

Comes standard with a seven years/150,000km warranty plus a separate warranty of the same duration covering the propulsion battery. Roadside assist for up to eight years is also available if serviced at an authorised Kia dealer.

Scheduled servicing is every 24 months/30,000km whichever occurs first, with Kia offering a pre-paid service plan covering the first four scheduled services up to four years/120,000km which totals $2246 or an average of $562 per service. This is one of the strongest warranty/service packages offered for a full-electric van, backed by a national network of more than 150 Kia dealers across all states and territories.

It comes with a five-year/100,000km standard warranty, or 10 years/200,000km if serviced at Mitsubishi dealers.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first. Pricing is capped at $6860 for 10 scheduled services up to 10 years/150,000km, or an average of $686 per service.

Mitsubishi currently has more than 200 dealers across its national network that spans metro, rural and regional areas. Mitsubishi dealerships are also service centres.