BYD Atto 3 vs GWM Ora 5

What's the difference?

So, would I recommend this new Atto 3 Evo to my friend, or indeed anyone in the market for a mid-size electric SUV?

While it may look largely the same as it did back in 2022, the Atto 3 is now a far more compelling proposition than it was then. Certainly BYD has established itself in the market and that means there is more certainty for buyers.

But this new Atto 3 Premium is a big leap forward when it comes to the driving experience. And while that’s not likely to be a huge factor for most mid-size electric SUV buyers, given the price has only crept up marginally (by modern standards) it remains competitively positioned.

For context, the Leapmotor C10 is another mid-size, rear-wheel drive electric SUV from China and it is even more expensive than the Atto 3 and is, to be blunt, nowhere near as good.

If BYD continues to produce cars this good there’s no reason to believe it won’t be a major player for years to come.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with accommodation and meals provided.

While the Ora 5 still has a relatively divisive design that will turn off a chunk of those looking for a small electric SUV, the improvements made when compared to the hatch launched years ago make it worth a second look.

The interior is much more user-friendly, there are more features and a more sensible variant line-up, and the ride and handling localisation means you might actually want to drive it out of the city on occasion.

Regardless, the Ora 5 needs to be a lot more competitive than the Ora hatch was, because the market is so much busier with affordable rivals now. Fortunately, the value proposition is indeed much better than before, especially given the Ultra is only $3000 more than the Lux.

Despite the major changes underneath, BYD hasn’t really changed much from a design point-of-view. Which is a trend for the brand, with the 2024 update also focusing primarily on improving technology rather than the looks. 

Externally there is a new lower bumper, which has some subtle changes to its air-intakes, extended daytime running lights, slightly slimmer side skirts and a reshaped rear spoiler. 

Inside there are a few minor differences, with the gear selector moving to the steering column to create more storage space in the centre console, and the steering wheel is a new design. 

The other notable change is the driver instrument display, which has grown from five- to 8.8-inch.

There’s also a new grey interior colour trim, which looks more premium to this reviewer’s eyes than the blue/white cabin of the older model.

And, for better or worse, the Atto 3’s most memorable feature, the ‘guitar strings’ on the door, remain. While they may not be to everyone’s taste, there is an argument to be made that BYD should be acknowledged for not making the simplest/cheapest cabin possible.  

GWM is being pretty bold in calling the Ora 5’s design ‘timeless’ in its press materials.

The brand’s head designer says the Ora 5 isn’t shouting for attention, but I’m going to disagree. While I don’t think being attention-grabbing is a bad thing, the retro-leaning vibe the Ora hatch gave off a few years ago remains strong here on the 5 SUV.

We’re told much of it was inspired by nature - the wheels inspired by clovers, the lights by water drops, the body by smooth pebbles and the tail-lights by a sunrise - but it still looks a little alien from a couple of angles, mostly the rear.

The proportions are however better than the hatch, and from the side it gets away with looking a little like an attempt at a Porsche Cayenne.

The big thing you have to give GWM props for is including three properly vibrant colours (Cute Cyan, Flamingo Pink and Emerald Green) in the range, even though anything but Pepper White is a $595 option. Mystic Grey and matt Crystal Black complete the six options.

Inside, the Ora 5’s unique design feels distant, as the interior looks much like the vast majority of small Chinese SUVs. A focus on the large main touchscreen, a layout of phone holder, cupholders and the armrest in a minimalist central console, and the almost-lack of buttons are all hallmarks of the genre.

Only small touches like apparently Mini-inspired climate controls or the cat-shaped magnet (the Ora was called Funky Cat in China) holding the vanity mirror cover up really give it away as an Ora, aside from the exclamation mark logo on the steering wheel.

The new driver instrument display is a big improvement. Frankly, the old screen was quite small and provided limited information compared to this newer, larger display.

The 15.8-inch multimedia touchscreen came with the last update and remains a relatively straightforward system to use. However, the need to take your eyes off the road to adjust controls for the air-conditioning is unnecessary and could be fixed by the simple addition of physical controls. 

The decision to move the gear selector to the steering column liberates a good amount of space between the front seats. 

There is now room for two smartphones to sit side-by-side (although only one wireless charging pad), as well as two cupholders and a lidded console box.

Space inside the cabin obviously remains the same, with good room for what is a small (or at least a smaller mid-size) SUV.

Cargo space, on the other hand, is changed. The Dynamic measures 434-litres, which is almost identical to the previous model. Things are different for the Premium with the shift to the rear-mounted motor, with the rear boot measuring 490L plus there is now a 101L under bonnet storage space.

The Ora 5 takes a noticeable step up over the previous Ora hatchback in terms of interior ergonomics, bringing it up to a decent standard.

The seats are more easily adjustable to find a decent driving position, the tech is a lot easier to navigate, and there are a couple of inclusions that put the Ora 5 a nose ahead of rivals.

As mentioned, the layout is fairly unimaginative in terms of design, but it does work practically in that there aren’t many elements of the interior to get in the way.

More buttons would of course be welcome, as using the touchscreen while on the move can be particularly fiddly. The upside is the software itself is more sensible in terms of menus, it just has small buttons. There is, mercifully, an always-on shortcut bar even while phone mirroring.

Android users will also be pleased to know there’s wireless Android Auto from launch in the Ora 5, rather than needing to wait for an update as some did when the Ora hatch launched.

USB-C ports and small storage slots are present front and rear, though single-zone climate means everyone needs to agree on one temperature (or be subjected to the driver’s decision).

There’s also only one vent in the rear, though the space itself is decently roomy, with the sunroof in the Ultra providing a nice amount of light. A central fold-down armrest would, however, be welcome.

Behind the rear seat is a 362L boot and underneath it lies an extremely welcome inclusion: a space-saver spare tyre.

GWM said it added the spare locally due to the heavy influence of the Australian market and the regular disappointment when only a repair kit is included.

The good news is that the Ora 5 SUV kicks things off with a fairly competitive price, $33,990 drive-away.

That’s for the entry-grade Lux, though a slightly upgraded variant called the Ultra comes in at $36,990. Still pretty good value for a small electric SUV.

The list of standard features is decent, with a large 14.6-inch multimedia touchscreen and wireless phone mirroring, a 10.25-inch driver display and synthetic leather upholstery with electric seat adjustment for the driver.

There are also 18-inch wheels, auto LED headlights and LED tail-lights, rain-sensing wipers and tinted privacy glass for the rear windows.

The Ultra’s extra $3000 makes both front seats electrically adjustable, while adding seat ventilation and heating, wireless phone charging, ambient lighting, a panoramic sunroof, and three extra speakers for nine in total.

Weirdly, single-zone climate control is standard for both variants despite the touchscreen having a set of controls for each passenger.

It’s priced just above the relatively new BYD Atto 2 small SUV ($31,990 before on-roads) or the even-more-recently arrived MG4 Urban ($31,990 drive-away) hatch that have slightly smaller batteries and somewhat fewer features. It undercuts the Jaecoo J5 EV ($36,990 drive-away) and Leapmotor B10 ($37,888 before on-roads).

The Dynamic retains the same front-mounted, front-wheel drive electric motor as the Essential, which provides 150kW/310Nm of performance.

The Premium, on the other hand, gets an entirely new underpinning, with BYD’s new ‘e-Platform 3.0’ chassis, which introduces 800V electrical architecture (compared to 400V for the Dynamic). This includes a larger battery but also a switch to a rear-mounted, rear-wheel drive motor that makes 230kW/380Nm, which is a sizeable bump from the Dynamic.

The Ora 5 uses a fairly tried and true propulsion method for budget-friendly EVs, that being a single motor mounted at the front axle.

This one has 150kW and 260Nm, the same for both variants, and feels just lively enough to avoid being branded sluggish.

Naturally, the changes to the motors and platform also mean some major changes to the batteries and driving range.

The Premium now features a 74.8kWh lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery, which allows for a claimed range of 510km, up from the 420km previously offered by the pre-updated model.

The Dynamic, however, has the 420km range, as it now uses the same 60.4kWh LFP battery as the old Essential Extended Range. 

The previously available 49.9kWh battery, that had 325km of range, is now dropped. So, while the Dynamic technically costs more than the previous Essential, it comes with a bigger battery so you’re getting a higher specification vehicle.

BYD claims the charging speed has been increased thanks to the new 800V architecture. The Premium is now capable of taking up to 220kW of DC charging, which means it can get to 80 per cent capacity in as little as 25 minutes.

The Atto 3 Evo also features vehicle-to-load (V2L) functionality, which means you can draw power from the car’s battery to power small electronic devices if needed.

An hour and a half drive through Melbourne into the Yarra valley saw the Ora 5 use 16.1kWh/100km, according to the trip computer.

At that rate, the claimed 435km range from the Ora 5’s 58.3kWh battery feels a little optimistic, but we did plenty of driving out of the city’s EV-range-friendly confines.

DC fast-charging is maxed at 120kW, and should take about 30 minutes from 10 to 80 per cent.

BYD didn’t have any examples of the Dynamic for us to drive, which makes sense given the significance of the changes to the Premium. 

Previous experience with the front-wheel drive version of the Atto 3 didn’t leave much of an impression. It’s a perfectly acceptable mid-size SUV in terms of how it drives and rides, but it didn’t do anything special that made it stand out in a very competitive field.

This new Premium model, however, is a different story. The switch to the rear-wheel drive layout unsurprisingly has a dramatic impact on the way it drives. 

Around town, at urban speed, it feels good but where it shines is on the open road. It’s not wildly fast when you put your foot down, like some other EVs, but it has excellent composure and feels responsive. 

It’s not what you’d call a sporty or ‘hot SUV’ but it certainly leaves a good impression, one that will last longer than the front-wheel drive version.

Certainly the steering could be tuned better, it doesn’t offer much feeling, particularly just off-centre. And the ride can be noticeably firm at times, hitting bumps with a sharpness that you can feel in the cabin. It’s another example of where the Chinese brands could benefit from local suspension and chassis tuning to help it better suit Australia’s unique conditions.

First impressions on an unfortunately wet day from behind the Ora 5’s wheel are that it does feel much improved compared to the Ora hatch.

The biggest change under the skin appears to be the result of local tuning, undertaken by former Holden engineer Rob Trubiani.

The Ora 5 handles small bumps and rough roads better than the hatch did, while settling over bigger imperfections relatively quickly. 

Even with questionable tyres on wet roads, the Ora 5 remained steady under quick, sharp cornering and wouldn’t understeer as the hatch did.

While it’s not brimming with dynamic prowess, the Ora 5 now feels capable of taking on Australian roads without frustrating its driver.

The steering feel, response and feedback aren’t anything to write home about, but do at least result in accurate cornering, and there is the option of adjusting the steering weight.

The Ora 5’s power delivery feels about right for its class and, even though it won’t rocket past anyone during an overtake, it’s more than enough for the city driving it’ll regularly be doing.

The advanced driver assist safety systems (ADAS), too, are a lot better programmed than expected. In highway driving and along twisting semi-rural roads, the Ora 5’s ADAS systems were all left on without much unnecessary intervention.

ANCAP hasn’t completed an assessment of the Ora 5 SUV yet so, for now, the model remains unrated.

GWM says it has built the car to a standard it expects should be awarded five stars, though we won’t have the answer to that until late 2026.

Seven airbags and a pretty comprehensive list of features including door-open warning and rear cross-traffic alert should mean the Ora 5 fares well for at least the on-paper assessment. 

The Ora 5 SUV also has a space-saver spare, and one of its seven airbags is a centre airbag, both things that are sometimes neglected in more affordable models.

All safety features are also standard for both variants, including the surround-view camera, so points for GWM there.

One of my ‘dislikes’ when I drove the Atto 3 in 2024 was “long-term BYD prospects still unclear” - driven by the fact it was still a relatively small brand with a limited line-up (the Shark 6 wouldn’t launch until two months later). Well, as I write this in September of 2026 it’s safe to say BYD’s long-term prospects look as good as any brand.

It is sitting in second spot on the year-to-date sales charts, behind only Toyota but surpassing the likes of Kia, Ford and Mazda. There can be no question BYD has cemented its place in the Australian market.

It already has more than 100 dealer and service locations, with plans to grow that to 150 by the end of 2026.

As for the Atto 3’s specific ownership credentials, it’s covered by the brand’s standard six-year/150,000km warranty. The battery has a separate eight-year/160,000km warranty and the Drive Unit (the motor) is covered for eight years and 150,000km.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 20,000km, and with capped price servicing the Dynamic should cost you $1410 and the Premium $1670 for the first five years.

GWM’s seven-year unlimited kilometre warranty is on the better side of average for mainstream brands, with the battery getting eight years, also unlimited.

But it’s the seven years of roadside and seven years capped-price servicing that make it a strong offering, especially when each service is just $195. That’s every 12 months or 15,000km.