BYD Atto 3 vs Toyota BZ4X

What's the difference?

So, would I recommend this new Atto 3 Evo to my friend, or indeed anyone in the market for a mid-size electric SUV?

While it may look largely the same as it did back in 2022, the Atto 3 is now a far more compelling proposition than it was then. Certainly BYD has established itself in the market and that means there is more certainty for buyers.

But this new Atto 3 Premium is a big leap forward when it comes to the driving experience. And while that’s not likely to be a huge factor for most mid-size electric SUV buyers, given the price has only crept up marginally (by modern standards) it remains competitively positioned.

For context, the Leapmotor C10 is another mid-size, rear-wheel drive electric SUV from China and it is even more expensive than the Atto 3 and is, to be blunt, nowhere near as good.

If BYD continues to produce cars this good there’s no reason to believe it won’t be a major player for years to come.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with accommodation and meals provided.

Is the bZ4X Touring the right Toyota for this moment in time or too little too late for the brand to play catch-up to its EV rivals?

The good news for Toyota is that it isn’t too late, at all. The Touring expands the appeal of the bZ4X, metaphorically and literally, and certainly the sales trajectory in 2026 suggests buyers are warming to Toyota’s electric future.

However, it remains a more expensive proposition for its size and the Touring doesn’t really make it stand out amongst the crowd that includes the popular BYD Sealion 7 and Tesla Model Y. It’s unfamiliar territory for Toyota, but it didn’t become the automotive juggernaut it is by giving up, so there is every reason to think the bZ4X duo will chip away at the EV sales leaders.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

Despite the major changes underneath, BYD hasn’t really changed much from a design point-of-view. Which is a trend for the brand, with the 2024 update also focusing primarily on improving technology rather than the looks. 

Externally there is a new lower bumper, which has some subtle changes to its air-intakes, extended daytime running lights, slightly slimmer side skirts and a reshaped rear spoiler. 

Inside there are a few minor differences, with the gear selector moving to the steering column to create more storage space in the centre console, and the steering wheel is a new design. 

The other notable change is the driver instrument display, which has grown from five- to 8.8-inch.

There’s also a new grey interior colour trim, which looks more premium to this reviewer’s eyes than the blue/white cabin of the older model.

And, for better or worse, the Atto 3’s most memorable feature, the ‘guitar strings’ on the door, remain. While they may not be to everyone’s taste, there is an argument to be made that BYD should be acknowledged for not making the simplest/cheapest cabin possible.  

What stands out about the design of the bZ4X Touring is the fact it is a bZ4X. Unlike Subaru, which opted to position its bZ4X twins, the Solterra and Trailseeker, as separate models, Toyota has stuck with the single nameplate and a very similar look.

At the front the Touring looks almost identical to the SUV and it’s only at the back where things deviate notably. Toyota has stretched the Touring by 140mm and redesigned it to have a more vertical tailgate.

To further differentiate between the two bZ4X offerings, the Touring gets unique 20-inch alloy wheels, as well as front and rear skid plates, roof rails (which can take up to 80kg of weight), matt finished wheel arches, a contrasting bonnet insert plus a rear window wiper.

Inside the design is carried over unchanged, which means the same interior that has Toyota elements but also some Subaru influence and a bit of EV differentiation. So it doesn’t look exactly like what you expect from Toyota, but it’s still clearly in the Toyota family.

The new driver instrument display is a big improvement. Frankly, the old screen was quite small and provided limited information compared to this newer, larger display.

The 15.8-inch multimedia touchscreen came with the last update and remains a relatively straightforward system to use. However, the need to take your eyes off the road to adjust controls for the air-conditioning is unnecessary and could be fixed by the simple addition of physical controls. 

The decision to move the gear selector to the steering column liberates a good amount of space between the front seats. 

There is now room for two smartphones to sit side-by-side (although only one wireless charging pad), as well as two cupholders and a lidded console box.

Space inside the cabin obviously remains the same, with good room for what is a small (or at least a smaller mid-size) SUV.

Cargo space, on the other hand, is changed. The Dynamic measures 434-litres, which is almost identical to the previous model. Things are different for the Premium with the shift to the rear-mounted motor, with the rear boot measuring 490L plus there is now a 101L under bonnet storage space.

One of the most notable examples of this is the set-up of the steering wheel and instrument display. The digital display screen is set far back on the dash and the wheel has a small diameter so you look over it rather than through the rim; similar to Peugeot’s polarising ergonomics. It’s not a deal-breaker, but it is a stand out feature of the interior. 

Thankfully, while there is a 14-inch multimedia touchscreen, unlike so many other modern EVs there are plenty of physical buttons and dials, too. Not to sound like an old man, but these are simply better in my opinion as they are easier to use, especially on the move.

In terms of space, the Touring feels roomy for a mid-size SUV, but not as spacious as some of its rivals. In the second row headroom is good and there is enough knee and foot room for two adults to sit in relative comfort.

The rear seat occupants are well catered for with their own air-conditioning, heated outboard seats and two USB-C ports.

The biggest practicality boost for the Touring is the boot volume. By stretching the length, Toyota has added another 151 litres of cargo space, so the total volume is now 603 litres, which is a generous amount of room for a mid-size SUV and ideal for those looking to load up with luggage for a road trip.

In keeping with the slow and steady approach, Toyota is offering a single variant of the Touring to complement the existing bZ4X model.

Priced from $69,990, before on-road costs, it is a $2000 premium over the standard AWD bZ4X, but it’s still $5000 less than the original starting price for the SUV before its recent price cut.

Based on size and price, the Touring positions itself as rival to everything from the BYD Sealion 7 to the Zeekr 7X and a wide variety in between including the Kia EV5, MG MGS6, Tesla Model Y, Volkswagen ID.4 and, of course, the Subaru Trailseeker - with which it shares its underpinnings (as both the Solterra/Trailseeker and bZ4X pair were co-developed between the two Japanese brands).

The singular bZ4X Touring comes equipped with dual-zone climate control, heated and ventilated front seats, a digital rear-vision mirror, a fixed panoramic sunroof, dual wireless phone chargers and a 14-inch touchscreen with a nine-speaker JBL premium audio system.

While that’s a generous amount of equipment, the Toyota doesn’t stand out in terms of value, with the Model Y range starting at $58,900, Zeekr’s 7X from $57,900 and the Sealion 7 from $54,990.

In short, the mid-size electric SUV market is getting more and more competitive and Toyota will need to work hard for every single sale.

The Dynamic retains the same front-mounted, front-wheel drive electric motor as the Essential, which provides 150kW/310Nm of performance.

The Premium, on the other hand, gets an entirely new underpinning, with BYD’s new ‘e-Platform 3.0’ chassis, which introduces 800V electrical architecture (compared to 400V for the Dynamic). This includes a larger battery but also a switch to a rear-mounted, rear-wheel drive motor that makes 230kW/380Nm, which is a sizeable bump from the Dynamic.

One of the biggest differences between the regular bZ4X and the Touring is the single powertrain option. While the standard bZ4X can be had at a cheaper price with a single-motor, front-wheel drive set-up, the Touring is exclusively available with the dual-motor, all-wheel drive powertrain.

This is good for 280kW of power, which is very punchy for a Toyota mid-size SUV, and is enough for it to take just 4.4 second to sprint from 0-100km/h, which is downright rapid.

Naturally, the changes to the motors and platform also mean some major changes to the batteries and driving range.

The Premium now features a 74.8kWh lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery, which allows for a claimed range of 510km, up from the 420km previously offered by the pre-updated model.

The Dynamic, however, has the 420km range, as it now uses the same 60.4kWh LFP battery as the old Essential Extended Range. 

The previously available 49.9kWh battery, that had 325km of range, is now dropped. So, while the Dynamic technically costs more than the previous Essential, it comes with a bigger battery so you’re getting a higher specification vehicle.

BYD claims the charging speed has been increased thanks to the new 800V architecture. The Premium is now capable of taking up to 220kW of DC charging, which means it can get to 80 per cent capacity in as little as 25 minutes.

The Atto 3 Evo also features vehicle-to-load (V2L) functionality, which means you can draw power from the car’s battery to power small electronic devices if needed.

The bZ4X Touring is fitted with a 74.7kWh battery, which is enough for a claimed range of 488km. That’s a reasonable distance, on par with the BYD Sealion 7, Kia EV5 and MGS6 but isn’t class-leading. It also probably looks a bit short on paper as Toyota is pushing this as "purpose-built for long distance touring."

However, the Touring wins some points back with its 1500W inverter that provides vehicle-to-load (V2L) charging, which not all models in this segment offer.

Charging maxes out at 150kW DC and 22kW AC, but Toyota says with the DC charger it can take just 28 minutes to recharge the battery from 10 to 80 per cent.

BYD didn’t have any examples of the Dynamic for us to drive, which makes sense given the significance of the changes to the Premium. 

Previous experience with the front-wheel drive version of the Atto 3 didn’t leave much of an impression. It’s a perfectly acceptable mid-size SUV in terms of how it drives and rides, but it didn’t do anything special that made it stand out in a very competitive field.

This new Premium model, however, is a different story. The switch to the rear-wheel drive layout unsurprisingly has a dramatic impact on the way it drives. 

Around town, at urban speed, it feels good but where it shines is on the open road. It’s not wildly fast when you put your foot down, like some other EVs, but it has excellent composure and feels responsive. 

It’s not what you’d call a sporty or ‘hot SUV’ but it certainly leaves a good impression, one that will last longer than the front-wheel drive version.

Certainly the steering could be tuned better, it doesn’t offer much feeling, particularly just off-centre. And the ride can be noticeably firm at times, hitting bumps with a sharpness that you can feel in the cabin. It’s another example of where the Chinese brands could benefit from local suspension and chassis tuning to help it better suit Australia’s unique conditions.

While the dual-motor powertrain provides serious performance when you put your foot down, that’s not really the point of a mid-size electric SUV aimed at family buyers. Sure, it’s a nice-to-have, but it shouldn’t define the driving experience of the bZ4X Touring.

Not surprisingly, it’s very similar to drive to the standard bZ4X and that’s no bad thing. The steering is quick and direct and coupled with the performance it means the Touring does feel a step above the average petrol- or diesel-powered SUV in terms of responsiveness.

The ride is pretty good for such a heavy vehicle. It doesn’t ride like a magic carpet but nor is it harsh and uncomfortable. It will crash over the occasional sharper bump, but overall Toyota has done a nice job on the chassis tuning to keep a family buyer happy.

What isn’t so good is the amount of noise that leaks into the cabin. During our drive on the open road we couldn’t help but notice the significant amount of tyre roar and wind noise at speeds above 70km/h.

But what stands out most about the driving experience in many respects is the regenerative braking, which is much more subtle than rival EVs. It lacks the one-pedal driving character of other EVs and that makes for an easier transition for those coming to electric motoring for the first time. On the flip side, it means less energy recovered at times, which means the bZ4X could be more efficient.

Safety is one area where the bZ4X Touring and Toyota do stand out in the electric SUV contest. As we have written many times in recent years, the flood of new active safety technology has led to some, frankly, annoying cars to drive. Over-reactive safety features can be distracting and diminish the driving experience and ultimately become so frustrating many owners will turn them off.

Toyota, however, has used its years of experience to ensure the safety systems in the Touring work more seamlessly. There are plenty of systems, too, with autonomous emergency braking (AEB), rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, driver attention monitoring,  blind-spot monitoring and traffic sign recognition all included.

During our test drive the driver attention monitor only intervened when needed and otherwise the car only reacted when it absolutely had to rather than being too sensitive. It’s part of the reason why the bZ4X carries a price premium, because you’re paying for Toyota’s experience.

In addition to those active safety features the Touring comes with eight airbags and surround view cameras, plus connected services with SOS emergency calling, plus automatic collision notification and vehicle insights.

ANCAP awarded the bZ4X SUV a maximum five-star rating based on its pre-2026 testing protocols, and while it is untested, given the similarities between the two cars and historical precedence there’s no reason to anticipate a different score.

One of my ‘dislikes’ when I drove the Atto 3 in 2024 was “long-term BYD prospects still unclear” - driven by the fact it was still a relatively small brand with a limited line-up (the Shark 6 wouldn’t launch until two months later). Well, as I write this in September of 2026 it’s safe to say BYD’s long-term prospects look as good as any brand.

It is sitting in second spot on the year-to-date sales charts, behind only Toyota but surpassing the likes of Kia, Ford and Mazda. There can be no question BYD has cemented its place in the Australian market.

It already has more than 100 dealer and service locations, with plans to grow that to 150 by the end of 2026.

As for the Atto 3’s specific ownership credentials, it’s covered by the brand’s standard six-year/150,000km warranty. The battery has a separate eight-year/160,000km warranty and the Drive Unit (the motor) is covered for eight years and 150,000km.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 20,000km, and with capped price servicing the Dynamic should cost you $1410 and the Premium $1670 for the first five years.

A key selling point for any Toyota, but especially one with new(-ish) technology, is that with 270 dealers around the country, Toyota has one of the biggest footprints.

The Touring is covered by Toyota’s standard five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, which is fine but is increasingly looking off-the-pace compared to a growing list of rivals with seven or more years of coverage.

On the plus side the bZ4X delivers on the promise of cheaper EV servicing, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km (whichever comes first) with each visit capped at $190 for the first five years.