Mazda BT-50 vs Volkswagen Amarok

What's the difference?

The XTR LE adds polish to the BT-50 line-up, in more ways than just its silver metallic paint and highly buffed accessories. It also has exceptional fuel economy and is equally competent as a suburban daily driver, tradie’s workhorse and weekend escape machine, with robust load-carrying and towing ability. For those wanting an upmarket version of the popular XTR, the LE has plenty of appeal. 

Minimal bling is standard issue in workhorse utes, but the Amarok Core has a more upmarket look and feel than we typically expect in these base-grade models. With its alloy wheels, sharp styling and refined handling, it’s a competent worker with a touch of European panache – and pricing to match.

The XTR is a happy medium between the work-focused XS and XT models and higher-grade GT, SP and top-shelf Thunder offerings, so the additional equipment that comes with the LE enhances the appeal of this popular model grade.

The bull-bar integrates with the BT-50’s safety systems ensuring crumple zones, airbags and driver assistance systems are not compromised. 

This bull-bar design also ensures no adverse effect on engine and transmission cooling and its single hoop is ideal for mounting extra driving lights.

The load tub-mounted sports-bar includes an integrated brake light for enhanced safety, while the heavy-duty tub-liner protects against dents and scratches.

The XTR interior has a quality look and feel with a tasteful blend of piano black and satin chrome highlights on the dashboard and door linings, contrasting fabric seat trim, exposed stitching along numerous seams and adjustable centre console a/c vents for rear seat passengers.

Driver and front passenger get comfortable bucket seats and the rear seating is also accommodating, with ample head and kneeroom even for tall adults. 

However, shoulder room is tight when travelling three-abreast, so like most dual cabs of this size it’s most comfortable as a four-seater.

Although it shares underpinnings, drivetrains and technology with the Ranger, Volkswagen has done a commendable job in differentiating the Amarok in both design and dynamics (see Driving).

Its unique styling features a broad and imposing grille and headlights reminiscent of the original model which accentuates the vehicle’s width, resulting in a broad-shouldered look.

The interior design is also pleasing, even at this entry level, with European influence evident in the look and feel of various controls, including a left-hand indicator stalk and piano key-style buttons on the centre console.

There are big assist handles on the A and B pillars and the driver and front passenger seating is firmly bolstered and supportive. The rear bench seat is also comfortable and spacious with good kneeroom, given I’m 186cm and can sit behind the driver’s seat in my position with sufficient clearance. This has cured the cramped rear legroom that plagued the original Amarok.

There’s also ample rear headroom, even for tall people sitting in the slightly higher centre seat. However, shoulder room is tight for three adults (typical in utes this size) so for long trips two would be ideal.

Our only criticisms are the absence of air-vents in the centre console for rear seat passengers and no physical dials on the dash for altering cabin temperature and fan speed. These climate adjustments must be made using the touchscreen, which can be distracting when driving.

The addition of the LE’s accessories adds 81kg to the XTR’s kerb weight, which increases from 2030kg to 2111kg. As a result, the payload rating must drop by the same amount, from 1070kg to 989kg, to avoid exceeding the vehicle’s 3100kg GVM. 

The LE retains the XTR’s class-benchmark 3500kg braked tow rating but to keep below its 5950kg GCM (how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) while doing that, the payload limit would have to be reduced by a sizeable 650kg. 

Alternatively, you could lower the trailer weight limit by the same amount (to 2850kg) and keep the full payload, which is not only more practical but also safer for towing.

The lined load tub is 1571mm long, 1530mm wide and 490mm deep with 1120mm between the wheel housings, which means it can’t carry a standard Aussie pallet but will take a Euro. There are four sturdy load anchorage points.

Cabin storage includes a large-bottle holder and bin in the base of each front door. The dash offers a closable compartment to the right of the driver’s knee for small items, upper and lower glove boxes and an overhead glasses holder. 

The centre console has an open tray at the front, dual small-bottle/cup-holders in the centre and a small box at the rear with a contoured lid that doubles as a driver’s elbow rest.

Rear passengers get a large-bottle holder and small bin in each door, plus pockets on the front seat backrests and two pop-out cup holders in the fold-down centre armrest. So, in total that’s four large-bottle holders and six small-bottle/cupholders. 

The 60/40-split rear seat base-cushions can also swing up and be stored vertically if more internal load space is needed. This also reveals two underfloor compartments with lids for keeping valuables out of sight, so there are plenty of places to store things.

With its 2269kg kerb weight and 3250kg GVM, the Amarok Core has a 981kg payload rating, which makes it eligible for a novated lease as it's below the 1000kg threshold that applies to those lease agreements.

Up to 85kg of that payload can be carried on the roof when driving, which increases to 350kg when the vehicle is stationary, making it suitable for roof-top tents, viewing platforms etc.

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer, but with its 6200kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) that would require a substantial 550kg reduction in vehicle payload (from 981kg to 431kg) to avoid exceeding the GCM.

A practical alternative would be to reduce the braked towing limit by the same amount (from 3500kg to 2950kg) and keep the maximum payload. That still allows for a sizeable towing capacity for most work and recreational tasks, given few (if any) owners need to tow 3500kg.

The load tub’s floor is 1544mm long and 529mm deep, with 1224mm between the wheel-housings ensuring the latest Amarok continues its predecessor’s ability to carry standard Aussie or Euro pallets.

It comes with no protective internal liner (genuine accessory is available) and the tailgate has no lower/lift assistance. However, the load tub does have bright internal lighting and sturdy-looking protective capping along the top edges, including a 130cm ruler on the tailgate. There are also six internal load-anchorage points, plus external rope rails along each side.

Cabin storage for driver and front passenger includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door, an open tray embedded in the centre dash-pad, upper and lower gloveboxes and an overhead glasses holder. The centre console has two small-bottle/cup-holders next to the gearshift, plus a lidded box at the back which doubles as a driver’s elbow rest.

Rear seat passengers get a small-bottle/cup-holder in each door, plus a fold-down centre armrest containing two more small-bottle/cup-holders. The seat’s base cushion can also swing up and be stored in a vertical position if more internal cargo space is required, or to access two underfloor storage compartments.

Our Amarok Core test vehicle is available only with a TDI405 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel and six-speed automatic for a list price of $55,490. That's about 9.0 per cent more than major player rivals like the closely-related Ford Ranger XL ($50,880) and Toyota HiLux Workmate ($50,420).

It may be the workhorse of the Amarok range, with fabric seating, wipe-clean vinyl flooring and rear drum brakes, but it looks a step above with its body colour-coded front bumper and chunky 17-inch ‘Combra’ alloy wheels with 255/70R17 tyres and a full-size steel spare.

Also standard are LED headlights and DRLs, side-steps, underbody drivetrain/fuel tank protection, front recovery hooks, 3.5-tonne tow-bar with 12-pin plug, locking rear differential, tyre pressure monitoring, rain-sensing wipers and more.

There’s also an 8.0-inch digital driver’s display and 10-inch touchscreen for the four-speaker multimedia system which includes wireless phone-charging, wireless Apple/Android connectivity, DAB digital radio, USB A and C ports and two 12-volt outlets.

The Isuzu-sourced 3.0-litre four-cylinder intercooled turbo-diesel is a refined and proven performer, producing 140kW at 3600rpm and 450Nm of torque which peaks across a 1000rpm-wide band between 1600-2600rpm.

This is paired with a refined Aisin six-speed torque converter automatic, offering fast but smooth shifting and intelligent protocols that prompt automatic downshifting to assist with engine-braking on steep descents. 

It also has sequential manual-shifting plus overdrive on the top two ratios to optimise fuel economy during highway driving.

The part-time, dual-range 4x4 transmission has 2.482:1 low-range reduction and a switchable locking rear diff.

The TDI405 is a 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel producing 125kW of power at 3500rpm and 405Nm of torque between 1750-2500rpm.

This is paired with a six-speed torque converter automatic that offers the choice of manual sequential-shifting, which can be handy in off-road driving situations and when heavy towing, particularly in hilly terrain. There’s also four different drive modes comprising Normal, Eco, Slippery and Towing/Heavy Load.

The part-time, dual-range 4Motion 4x4 system offers three selectable drive modes comprising 2H (4x2 high range), 4H (4x4 high range) and 4L (4x4 low range). It also has a locking rear differential.

Mazda claims official combined cycle consumption of 8.0L/100km which was close to the 8.4 showing on the dash display at the end of our 276km test. 

Both were close to our own figure of 8.7 calculated from fuel bowser and trip meter readings, which is outstanding single-digit economy for a 4x4 dual-cab ute weighing more than two tonnes. 

So, based on our numbers, you could expect an excellent real-world driving range of around 870km from its 76-litre tank.

Volkswagen claims an official combined average of 8.0L/100km and the dash display was only slightly higher at 8.7 when we stopped to refuel after our 345km test, of which about one third was carrying its maximum payload. This compares with our own figure calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings of 10.0L/100km, resulting in a ‘real world’ driving range of around 800km from its big 80-litre tank.

There are big handles on the front windscreen pillars to assist entry and it’s easy to find a comfortable driving position given the spacious cabin, height/reach adjustable and leather-wrapped steering wheel, big left footrest and adequate adjustment in the driver's seat which includes variable lumbar support. However, some rake adjustment in the seat base would be welcome.

It has solid build quality with low engine, tyre and wind noise. All-round vision is good, enhanced by useful driver aids like blind-spot monitoring and a reversing camera. 

Our only criticisms are an annoying glitch in the design of the driver’s sun-visor, which clips the edge of the rear-view mirror enough to dislodge it each time the visor is swung down. 

And there are no rotary dials on the media screen for quick and easy adjustment of audio settings. Buttons are not as user-friendly.

Handling is sure-footed for a high-riding 4x4, the braking is reassuringly strong (particularly under load) and steering feel is amongst the best in class. 

The engine has good response and never feels sluggish in city and suburban driving thanks to its broad spread of torque, enhanced by an automatic transmission that generally gets the best out of this engine without the need to manual-shift.

It’s also a comfortable and economical highway cruiser. With the overdriven top gear and full torque converter lock-up, it can consume long distances with minimal effort as the engine requires only 1600rpm to maintain 110km/h. The adaptive cruise control works well.

We didn’t forklift a load into the LE as we have already tested the standard XTR on which it’s based with a 950kg payload, which was only 40kg under the LE’s maximum rating. 

On that occasion the leaf-spring rear suspension compressed 75mm, but there was still more than 30mm of stationary bump-stop clearance remaining. That ensured it never bottomed-out, floating over large bumps and through dips with ease.

We have also towed a 2.5-tonne dual-axle caravan with an XTR during which it also excelled, so in LE form it’s not only a comfortable daily driver but a competent load-hauler, too.

The driver’s seat is supportive, with prominent side-bolsters on the base cushion and backrest holding you firmly in place and providing (dare we say) a ‘sporty’ feel for the driving position.

Although it shares the same suspension architecture as the Ranger, it has been tuned to provide a distinctive Volkswagen character with sure-footed solidity.

The steering feel is firm, responsive and nicely weighted, combined with a disciplined unladen ride quality with enough suppleness to absorb bumps with ease.

Noise insulation is also commendable for a base-grade model, with negligible engine, tyre and wind noise on the highway. It provides low-stress cruising at these speeds, thanks to adaptive cruise control and long-legged gearing which ensures the turbo-diesel only requires 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h.

To test its GVM rating we inflated the tyres to their recommended pressures (38psi front, 44psi rear) and forklifted 890kg into the load tub, which with driver equalled the 981kg payload limit.

The rear leaf springs compressed 70mm under this weight, but there was no chance of bottoming-out because of long cone-shaped jounce rubbers that engage with the springs early in their compression.

This design eliminates the hard thumps at full travel like traditional bump-stops and provide what is effectively a second stage of load support. The result is a smooth ride under maximum loads, regardless of road conditions.

We stuck with the 'Normal' drive mode, to assess its performance without resorting to the 'Towing/Heavy Load' setting and found it more than capable of doing the job.

Acceleration from standing starts was brisk given the load it was carrying, making light work of city and suburban driving. It was just as competent on the highway and when tackling our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set climb at 60km/h, self-shifting down to third gear and 2000rpm to easily haul this load to the summit.

The Amarok boasts a five-star ANCAP rating from assessment in 2022 and features nine airbags, including side-curtain protection for rear seat passengers that was missing in the original. There’s also AEB with pedestrian and cyclist monitoring, lane-keeping, trailer-sway control, adaptive load control, reversing camera and more, but our base model misses out on front/360-degree cameras plus blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert. There’s also ISOFIX child-seat mounts and top-tether anchorages on the two outer rear seat positions.

The BT-50 is covered by a five-year/unlimited km warranty.

Scheduled servicing is every 15,000km or 12 months, whichever occurs first. 

Minimum combined cost is $2404 for the first five scheduled services, for an annual average of $481.

Volkswagen covers the Amarok with a five year/unlimited km warranty plus 12 months complimentary roadside assist, which is par for the mainstream market course.

Scheduled servicing is 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-price five-year servicing plan costs $1900, or an average of $380 per year.