Mazda CX-60 vs Toyota BZ4X

What's the difference?

Have no doubts. The MY25 version of the CX-60 is the SUV that Mazda should have launched in Australia in 2023.

It fulfils the promise of its sophisticated specification, builds on the extensive dynamic abilities of previous models, and now provides a compelling – and unique – choice for medium-SUV buyers who do not need an extended seven-seater.

It may still looks a bit daggy from some angles outside, and we’d like a little bit less suspension noise on the inside, but the CX-60 should now be on Australian family-car shortlists.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

Is the bZ4X Touring the right Toyota for this moment in time or too little too late for the brand to play catch-up to its EV rivals?

The good news for Toyota is that it isn’t too late, at all. The Touring expands the appeal of the bZ4X, metaphorically and literally, and certainly the sales trajectory in 2026 suggests buyers are warming to Toyota’s electric future.

However, it remains a more expensive proposition for its size and the Touring doesn’t really make it stand out amongst the crowd that includes the popular BYD Sealion 7 and Tesla Model Y. It’s unfamiliar territory for Toyota, but it didn’t become the automotive juggernaut it is by giving up, so there is every reason to think the bZ4X duo will chip away at the EV sales leaders.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

If you’re searching for something new in the looks department for the CX-60, you won’t find it, since this is essentially the same car as last year’s model from the outside. Except there’s a new beige colour option.

Which means the same long-bonnet/cab-backward silhouette remains, along with the corporate wing-motif grille, hunched-over styling (that looks awkward from some angles) and short rear overhangs.

Still, the overall effect remains modern, clean and distinct from the nearly-identical and very closely-related CX-70, CX-80 and CX-90 further up the Mazda food chain.

Note that the CX-60 is usefully larger than the CX-5, with the former coming in at 4740mm long, 1890mm wide, 1675mm tall and 2870mm in wheelbase length, compared to the latter’s 4575mm, 1845mm, 1680mm and 2700mm dimensions respectively.

Which, of course, elevates it from an interior point of view.

What stands out about the design of the bZ4X Touring is the fact it is a bZ4X. Unlike Subaru, which opted to position its bZ4X twins, the Solterra and Trailseeker, as separate models, Toyota has stuck with the single nameplate and a very similar look.

At the front the Touring looks almost identical to the SUV and it’s only at the back where things deviate notably. Toyota has stretched the Touring by 140mm and redesigned it to have a more vertical tailgate.

To further differentiate between the two bZ4X offerings, the Touring gets unique 20-inch alloy wheels, as well as front and rear skid plates, roof rails (which can take up to 80kg of weight), matt finished wheel arches, a contrasting bonnet insert plus a rear window wiper.

Inside the design is carried over unchanged, which means the same interior that has Toyota elements but also some Subaru influence and a bit of EV differentiation. So it doesn’t look exactly like what you expect from Toyota, but it’s still clearly in the Toyota family.

Like the exterior, the changes for the MY25 CX-60 are pretty much under the skin, with improved noise/vibration and harshness-quelling measures to quieten things down more.

And an exhaust-sound enhancer through the audio system to liven things up if you desire.

Representing the aforementioned $10K saving over the previous entry-level Evolve, the Pure does possess less opulent trim and (nice) cloth seat fabrics, but otherwise the CX-60 does present a larger-than-usual cabin environment compared to smaller medium-sized SUVs.

But fans of big, showy screens may be underwhelmed.

The dash is elegant but somewhat old-fashioned, especially compared to, say, the latest BMW X3’s dazzling displays. It feels like a hangover from last decade’s CX-9.

Yet there’s no denying how satisfyingly easy and logical most of it is, from the super-clear, electronic instrumentation to the simple and effective climate control layout, while the iDrive-style rotary controller means less time with eyes off the road. Safe, intuitive ergonomics. Thank you, Mazda.

Additionally, there’s a quality solidness to the fit and finish that elevates the social-climbing Mazda beyond what a CX-5 could achieve.

All the essentials are also well thought out, from storage and vision out to ventilation and, not least of all, space and seat support, especially when sat on over long distances.

That also carries over to the expansive back-seat environment, with air vents, USB ports, lighting, cupholders and grab handles. The CX-60 is an SUV that a family could grow into without it feeling excessive.

Is this ‘big-medium’ or ‘small-large’ sized?

From the boot’s perspective, either fits, and is one of the reasons why you might consider stepping up to a CX-60. The floor is low, wide, flat and easy to load, as well as beautifully finished.

The 40/20/40 split fold backrests can be folded remotely via Mazda’s Karakuri function, boosting capacity from 477 litres (VDA) to 1726L, while the in-line six-cylinder models have a space-saver spare wheel underneath, leaving PHEV owners with an inadequate tyre repair kit.

One of the most notable examples of this is the set-up of the steering wheel and instrument display. The digital display screen is set far back on the dash and the wheel has a small diameter so you look over it rather than through the rim; similar to Peugeot’s polarising ergonomics. It’s not a deal-breaker, but it is a stand out feature of the interior. 

Thankfully, while there is a 14-inch multimedia touchscreen, unlike so many other modern EVs there are plenty of physical buttons and dials, too. Not to sound like an old man, but these are simply better in my opinion as they are easier to use, especially on the move.

In terms of space, the Touring feels roomy for a mid-size SUV, but not as spacious as some of its rivals. In the second row headroom is good and there is enough knee and foot room for two adults to sit in relative comfort.

The rear seat occupants are well catered for with their own air-conditioning, heated outboard seats and two USB-C ports.

The biggest practicality boost for the Touring is the boot volume. By stretching the length, Toyota has added another 151 litres of cargo space, so the total volume is now 603 litres, which is a generous amount of room for a mid-size SUV and ideal for those looking to load up with luggage for a road trip.

In keeping with the slow and steady approach, Toyota is offering a single variant of the Touring to complement the existing bZ4X model.

Priced from $69,990, before on-road costs, it is a $2000 premium over the standard AWD bZ4X, but it’s still $5000 less than the original starting price for the SUV before its recent price cut.

Based on size and price, the Touring positions itself as rival to everything from the BYD Sealion 7 to the Zeekr 7X and a wide variety in between including the Kia EV5, MG MGS6, Tesla Model Y, Volkswagen ID.4 and, of course, the Subaru Trailseeker - with which it shares its underpinnings (as both the Solterra/Trailseeker and bZ4X pair were co-developed between the two Japanese brands).

The singular bZ4X Touring comes equipped with dual-zone climate control, heated and ventilated front seats, a digital rear-vision mirror, a fixed panoramic sunroof, dual wireless phone chargers and a 14-inch touchscreen with a nine-speaker JBL premium audio system.

While that’s a generous amount of equipment, the Toyota doesn’t stand out in terms of value, with the Model Y range starting at $58,900, Zeekr’s 7X from $57,900 and the Sealion 7 from $54,990.

In short, the mid-size electric SUV market is getting more and more competitive and Toyota will need to work hard for every single sale.

For now, the base engine is the 209kW/450Nm G40e, a 3.3-litre turbo-petrol ‘six’ delivering the sort of healthy power figures that late-model Commodore and Falcon buyers would appreciate.

There’s also the 187kW/550Nm D50e turbo-diesel version, for extra pulling power and economy, and we’re getting into premium Euro territory here, because both offer a 48-volt, mild-hybrid system, employing a small electric motor located behind the engine to boost torque yet cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

Mazda says new motor control and clutch slip control software facilitates “…smoother transitions as the electric motor is activated and deactivated”. We hope so!

Last but not least, there’s the 241kW/500Nm P50e plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrain, combining the familiar 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a larger, 129kW electric motor powered by a 17.8kWh Lithium ion battery. The latter allows up to 76km of pure-electric driving, and can be recharged either by regenerative braking when driving or plugged into a Type 2 port.

All three engines use a revised eight-speed, wet multi-plate-clutch automatic transmission, still driving the rear or, as traction and/or performance needs arise, all four wheels.

Yep, this is essentially a rear-drive-biased family SUV, with a sophisticated double wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up to keep everything in line.

So, what’s changed underneath compared to last year’s CX-60?

Among the modifications are stiffer dampers and softer rear springs to address ride-comfort issues with the old car; relocated front knuckle mounts; altered rear axle bushes and the removal of the rear anti-roll bar for more stable control; shorter rear bump stops for greater suspension travel; an extra joint in the steering column quells vibrations while updated software improves steering feel and electronic stability control operation. The goal is for noticeably smoother, comfier and more linear dynamics. 

Result? To find out how much better or worse Mazda’s latest mid-sized SUV is, we drove the it in a variety of conditions, from the push-and-shove of Melbourne’s bumper-to-bumper peak-hour traffic, to a series of demanding emergency-swerve and multi-speed ride and handling test manoeuvres at the legendary Lang Lang proving ground that shaped so many of our iconic Holdens.

More on that a bit later on.

One of the biggest differences between the regular bZ4X and the Touring is the single powertrain option. While the standard bZ4X can be had at a cheaper price with a single-motor, front-wheel drive set-up, the Touring is exclusively available with the dual-motor, all-wheel drive powertrain.

This is good for 280kW of power, which is very punchy for a Toyota mid-size SUV, and is enough for it to take just 4.4 second to sprint from 0-100km/h, which is downright rapid.

One area where the Mazda did not need fixing is in its fuel economy.

All of the CX-60’s powertrains are rated at Euro 5.

Officially, the G40e 3.3-litre petrol averages 7.4L/100km, on the combined cycle, and emits 174 grams per kilometre of CO2. Urban and Extra Urban numbers are 9.9L/100km and 6.0L/100km.

Fitted with a 58L petrol tank, expect an average range of around 780km. And it will run on standard 91 RON unleaded petrol to boot.

Moving on to the D50e 3.3L diesel, it manages an impressive 5.0L/100km, for a CO2 figure of 132g/km, resulting in a range average of about 1160km. Its Urban/Extra Urban figures are 5.5/4.7L/100km respectively.

And, finally, there’s the P50e 2.5L PHEV, offering a theoretical 2.1L/100km, for a CO2 figure of just 49g/km, for an unlikely range average of 2380km from its 50L tank, though on 95 RON premium unleaded brew.

Out in the real world, and mostly driven harder than a typical owner might, the trip computer in the PHEV showed low sevens, while the diesel displayed mid-eights and the petrol high nines, which aren’t too bad at all.

The bZ4X Touring is fitted with a 74.7kWh battery, which is enough for a claimed range of 488km. That’s a reasonable distance, on par with the BYD Sealion 7, Kia EV5 and MGS6 but isn’t class-leading. It also probably looks a bit short on paper as Toyota is pushing this as "purpose-built for long distance touring."

However, the Touring wins some points back with its 1500W inverter that provides vehicle-to-load (V2L) charging, which not all models in this segment offer.

Charging maxes out at 150kW DC and 22kW AC, but Toyota says with the DC charger it can take just 28 minutes to recharge the battery from 10 to 80 per cent.

This is the acid test. Does the CX-60 drive like a Mazda should?

In the engine department, definitely.

The changes that Mazda has made to the transmission calibration means that it no longer hunts indecisively between ratios like it used to, and that results in smoother shifts as well as a more relaxed driving experience.

And that's across the range, whether we're talking about the six-cylinder diesel or petrol, or four-pot plug-in hybrid. And the latter brings the biggest surprise, because the changes made to the gearbox have resulted in a much more pleasant car around town, with no more shunting or jerky movements to contend with.

And then there's the ride, which is palpably softer than before. The suspension is significantly more pliable and comfortable as a consequence, offering better bump absorption, improved control at speed and basically just a more refined experience. We tried several of the Lang Lang Proving Ground’s rough-road tests, which the CX-60 sailed over without any of the hard jarring of the previous model, which Mazda helpfully provided for back-to-back assessments.

So, how does all that translate in everyday driving?

Well, the latest CX-60 is way more comfortable to ride in across the board, it handles and corners with greater control and linearity, seems quieter and it's just a suppler experience overall.

As there was so much that was good with the original CX-60 anyway, including muscular performance from the inline six-cylinder turbos, impressive high-speed stability and exceptional body control through fast turns, the modifications for 2025 do much to elevate an already good thing.

So, it's a win-win situation. If you are in the market for a sub-premium, mid-sized SUV with performance and space, as well as newfound comfort and sophistication, you can do a lot worse than check out the CX-60. It is that much better than before.

While the dual-motor powertrain provides serious performance when you put your foot down, that’s not really the point of a mid-size electric SUV aimed at family buyers. Sure, it’s a nice-to-have, but it shouldn’t define the driving experience of the bZ4X Touring.

Not surprisingly, it’s very similar to drive to the standard bZ4X and that’s no bad thing. The steering is quick and direct and coupled with the performance it means the Touring does feel a step above the average petrol- or diesel-powered SUV in terms of responsiveness.

The ride is pretty good for such a heavy vehicle. It doesn’t ride like a magic carpet but nor is it harsh and uncomfortable. It will crash over the occasional sharper bump, but overall Toyota has done a nice job on the chassis tuning to keep a family buyer happy.

What isn’t so good is the amount of noise that leaks into the cabin. During our drive on the open road we couldn’t help but notice the significant amount of tyre roar and wind noise at speeds above 70km/h.

But what stands out most about the driving experience in many respects is the regenerative braking, which is much more subtle than rival EVs. It lacks the one-pedal driving character of other EVs and that makes for an easier transition for those coming to electric motoring for the first time. On the flip side, it means less energy recovered at times, which means the bZ4X could be more efficient.

Safety is one area where the bZ4X Touring and Toyota do stand out in the electric SUV contest. As we have written many times in recent years, the flood of new active safety technology has led to some, frankly, annoying cars to drive. Over-reactive safety features can be distracting and diminish the driving experience and ultimately become so frustrating many owners will turn them off.

Toyota, however, has used its years of experience to ensure the safety systems in the Touring work more seamlessly. There are plenty of systems, too, with autonomous emergency braking (AEB), rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, driver attention monitoring,  blind-spot monitoring and traffic sign recognition all included.

During our test drive the driver attention monitor only intervened when needed and otherwise the car only reacted when it absolutely had to rather than being too sensitive. It’s part of the reason why the bZ4X carries a price premium, because you’re paying for Toyota’s experience.

In addition to those active safety features the Touring comes with eight airbags and surround view cameras, plus connected services with SOS emergency calling, plus automatic collision notification and vehicle insights.

ANCAP awarded the bZ4X SUV a maximum five-star rating based on its pre-2026 testing protocols, and while it is untested, given the similarities between the two cars and historical precedence there’s no reason to anticipate a different score.

Mazda could also do a bit better with its warranty nowadays, since its five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance is decidedly average.

Service intervals are at 12 months or every 15,000km, while a fixed-price service scheme is available, starting from $463 per service depending on powertrain. That’s for the petrol. The diesels start from $500 while the PHEVs commence from $435.

A key selling point for any Toyota, but especially one with new(-ish) technology, is that with 270 dealers around the country, Toyota has one of the biggest footprints.

The Touring is covered by Toyota’s standard five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, which is fine but is increasingly looking off-the-pace compared to a growing list of rivals with seven or more years of coverage.

On the plus side the bZ4X delivers on the promise of cheaper EV servicing, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km (whichever comes first) with each visit capped at $190 for the first five years.