Mazda CX-60 vs Honda ZR-V

What's the difference?

Have no doubts. The MY25 version of the CX-60 is the SUV that Mazda should have launched in Australia in 2023.

It fulfils the promise of its sophisticated specification, builds on the extensive dynamic abilities of previous models, and now provides a compelling – and unique – choice for medium-SUV buyers who do not need an extended seven-seater.

It may still looks a bit daggy from some angles outside, and we’d like a little bit less suspension noise on the inside, but the CX-60 should now be on Australian family-car shortlists.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The Honda ZR-V has always been an engaging and fun car that’s the right size for many people. The frugal hybrid powertrain has always been the pick too.

It’s great that Honda has finally introduced more affordable hybrid trims with this update which addresses one of my biggest criticisms of this car previously.

If you’re willing to forgo some luxury features, this entry-level hybrid trim is a fantastic car that still offers enough creature comforts to be driven daily.

Hopefully Honda has some renewed sales success with this car as I believe it’s a clear benchmark for the segment.

If you’re searching for something new in the looks department for the CX-60, you won’t find it, since this is essentially the same car as last year’s model from the outside. Except there’s a new beige colour option.

Which means the same long-bonnet/cab-backward silhouette remains, along with the corporate wing-motif grille, hunched-over styling (that looks awkward from some angles) and short rear overhangs.

Still, the overall effect remains modern, clean and distinct from the nearly-identical and very closely-related CX-70, CX-80 and CX-90 further up the Mazda food chain.

Note that the CX-60 is usefully larger than the CX-5, with the former coming in at 4740mm long, 1890mm wide, 1675mm tall and 2870mm in wheelbase length, compared to the latter’s 4575mm, 1845mm, 1680mm and 2700mm dimensions respectively.

Which, of course, elevates it from an interior point of view.

The exterior of the ZR-V has always left me feeling quite… meh. It’s a mundane and generic look that doesn’t stand out from the crowd, but that's no bad thing because not everyone wants a flashy car.

That said, I’m still not a fan of the front grille, which makes it look like this car has a moustache.

The dark red paint looks nice, though when it’s paired with these generic-looking grey alloy wheels and black wheel arch cladding, it cheapens the look. The top-spec e:HEV LX looks more attractive.

Inside, it’s similarly standard and doesn’t break the mould. Everything is where you’d expect it to be, which is great for functionality.

The wildest part of the interior is the centre tunnel which features a push-button gear selector and a split console section including a small storage area underneath that’s big enough for a phone.

Looking around, it’s a sea of black finishes, which is a bit boring. However, I do like the mesh panel that spans the dashboard and houses the air vents. It’s a premium touch.

Like the exterior, the changes for the MY25 CX-60 are pretty much under the skin, with improved noise/vibration and harshness-quelling measures to quieten things down more.

And an exhaust-sound enhancer through the audio system to liven things up if you desire.

Representing the aforementioned $10K saving over the previous entry-level Evolve, the Pure does possess less opulent trim and (nice) cloth seat fabrics, but otherwise the CX-60 does present a larger-than-usual cabin environment compared to smaller medium-sized SUVs.

But fans of big, showy screens may be underwhelmed.

The dash is elegant but somewhat old-fashioned, especially compared to, say, the latest BMW X3’s dazzling displays. It feels like a hangover from last decade’s CX-9.

Yet there’s no denying how satisfyingly easy and logical most of it is, from the super-clear, electronic instrumentation to the simple and effective climate control layout, while the iDrive-style rotary controller means less time with eyes off the road. Safe, intuitive ergonomics. Thank you, Mazda.

Additionally, there’s a quality solidness to the fit and finish that elevates the social-climbing Mazda beyond what a CX-5 could achieve.

All the essentials are also well thought out, from storage and vision out to ventilation and, not least of all, space and seat support, especially when sat on over long distances.

That also carries over to the expansive back-seat environment, with air vents, USB ports, lighting, cupholders and grab handles. The CX-60 is an SUV that a family could grow into without it feeling excessive.

Is this ‘big-medium’ or ‘small-large’ sized?

From the boot’s perspective, either fits, and is one of the reasons why you might consider stepping up to a CX-60. The floor is low, wide, flat and easy to load, as well as beautifully finished.

The 40/20/40 split fold backrests can be folded remotely via Mazda’s Karakuri function, boosting capacity from 477 litres (VDA) to 1726L, while the in-line six-cylinder models have a space-saver spare wheel underneath, leaving PHEV owners with an inadequate tyre repair kit.

In base-model form, it’s expected the ZR-V will have fabric upholstery. However, the seats still feel premium and are deliciously padded. They’re manually adjusted but I was still able to find a good driving position with ease.

One feature I was looking for was heated seats, especially on these brisk Melbourne mornings. It’s rare for a car with fabric seats to get heated seats, though. If you want them that badly, they’re available on higher trims.

Ahead of the driver is a leather-wrapped steering wheel which feels lovely. I particularly like the tactile feel of the buttons and switches.

The digital instrument cluster is clear and crisp. It offers multiple views to customise it, as well as a range of infographic pages to cycle through. I wish you could see the fuel consumption and hybrid system graphics at the same time, but thankfully they’re just a single scroll away from each other.

Moving across, the central touchscreen multimedia system is looking a small in 2026, measuring only 9.0 inches, although it’s still high-resolution and the colours are vibrant.

It appears computing power has been given a boost along with the integration of Google Built-in, as jumping from menu to menu has never been snappier.

Speaking of Google Built-in, it’s great to have the flexibility of using the integrated Google Maps and apps like Spotify and Apple Music, without needing your phone.

However, it’s still nice having Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, though the latter is strangely only offered in wired form. With my iPhone 15 Pro Max, the wireless connection was rock solid, though known interference points did cause CarPlay to stutter.

It’s great to see Honda retaining a physical climate control cluster as it’s intuitive to use. The dials in particular have a satisfying click when twirled.

In terms of storage there are two cupholders, two USB-C ports, a big centre console box, as well as an adequately sized glove box. It’s worth noting this trim level forgoes a wireless charger, meaning you’ll need to plug in to charge your phone.

Moving to the second row, there’s a surprising amount of space, even for adults. At a leggy 182cm, I have plenty of legroom and headroom.

You would easily be able to get two adults in the second row, though you’d be pushing it to fit three as the middle seat is narrow and raised. Kids will be fine, though.

Adding to the annoyance of the middle rear seat, the seat belt is mounted from the roof, which can obstruct rear visibility.

In terms of amenities there are air vents on the back of the front centre console, two USB-C ports, map pockets on the back of each front seat, as well as a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders.

There are also ISOFIX points on the two outboard seats, as well as top-tether child seat anchorages on all three rear seats.

Around the back it’s expected the entry-level hybrid will feature a manually operated tailgate. It’s light to open and close.

With the rear seats upright there’s 380L of boot space available, which is decent for this size of car. This figure includes a small underfloor section.

If you fold the rear seats the boot space expands to 1312L, which is cavernous for this type of car. The rear seats cleverly fold forwards and down at the same time, creating a seamless flat floor.

Boot-related amenities include a number of hooks, a 12V socket plus some lights. As is the case with many hybrids, the ZR-V e:HEV doesn’t come with any spare wheel. You need to make do with a tyre repair kit, which is nowhere near as handy if you have a proper puncture away from a tyre repair shop.

Honda has shuffled the ZR-V line-up for 2026, decreasing the petrol variants to a single, entry-level trim, while increasing the hybrid grades from one to three.

On test here is the ZR-V e:HEV X, which is the cheapest hybrid. It’s priced from $43,400, drive-away, which is $3500 more than the base petrol trim and $8500 less than the top-spec hybrid option.

This is priced keenly against entry-level versions of the Hyundai Kona Hybrid and Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid, while undercutting the Nissan Qashqai e-Power hybrid.

For the price you get standard 18-inch alloy wheels, adaptive LED headlights, a 10.2-inch digital instrument cluster, a 9.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system with wireless Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto, dual-zone climate control and cloth upholstery.

Now standard across the ZR-V line-up is Google Built-in which allows for Google Maps integration, the Google Assistant, plus you can download a number of apps, including Spotify, from the Google Play Store.

If you’re after features like a power tailgate, premium sound system, wireless charger, leather upholstery, plus heated seats with electric adjustment, you’ll need to look higher in the line-up. These are largely all nice-to-haves than musts, anyway.

For now, the base engine is the 209kW/450Nm G40e, a 3.3-litre turbo-petrol ‘six’ delivering the sort of healthy power figures that late-model Commodore and Falcon buyers would appreciate.

There’s also the 187kW/550Nm D50e turbo-diesel version, for extra pulling power and economy, and we’re getting into premium Euro territory here, because both offer a 48-volt, mild-hybrid system, employing a small electric motor located behind the engine to boost torque yet cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

Mazda says new motor control and clutch slip control software facilitates “…smoother transitions as the electric motor is activated and deactivated”. We hope so!

Last but not least, there’s the 241kW/500Nm P50e plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrain, combining the familiar 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a larger, 129kW electric motor powered by a 17.8kWh Lithium ion battery. The latter allows up to 76km of pure-electric driving, and can be recharged either by regenerative braking when driving or plugged into a Type 2 port.

All three engines use a revised eight-speed, wet multi-plate-clutch automatic transmission, still driving the rear or, as traction and/or performance needs arise, all four wheels.

Yep, this is essentially a rear-drive-biased family SUV, with a sophisticated double wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up to keep everything in line.

So, what’s changed underneath compared to last year’s CX-60?

Among the modifications are stiffer dampers and softer rear springs to address ride-comfort issues with the old car; relocated front knuckle mounts; altered rear axle bushes and the removal of the rear anti-roll bar for more stable control; shorter rear bump stops for greater suspension travel; an extra joint in the steering column quells vibrations while updated software improves steering feel and electronic stability control operation. The goal is for noticeably smoother, comfier and more linear dynamics. 

Result? To find out how much better or worse Mazda’s latest mid-sized SUV is, we drove the it in a variety of conditions, from the push-and-shove of Melbourne’s bumper-to-bumper peak-hour traffic, to a series of demanding emergency-swerve and multi-speed ride and handling test manoeuvres at the legendary Lang Lang proving ground that shaped so many of our iconic Holdens.

More on that a bit later on.

Power in the ZR-V hybrid continues to come from a 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with two electric motors. Total system outputs are 135kW and 315Nm.

This is sent to the front wheels only via an electronic continuously variable transmission (eCVT).

The Honda hybrid system positions the engine primarily as a generator for the battery pack at lower speeds, however once you reach 60-70km/h it can couple with the front axle and directly power the wheels.

It’s a smart system that allows for an electric zippy feel at lower speeds with the backing of a petrol engine at higher speeds.

One area where the Mazda did not need fixing is in its fuel economy.

All of the CX-60’s powertrains are rated at Euro 5.

Officially, the G40e 3.3-litre petrol averages 7.4L/100km, on the combined cycle, and emits 174 grams per kilometre of CO2. Urban and Extra Urban numbers are 9.9L/100km and 6.0L/100km.

Fitted with a 58L petrol tank, expect an average range of around 780km. And it will run on standard 91 RON unleaded petrol to boot.

Moving on to the D50e 3.3L diesel, it manages an impressive 5.0L/100km, for a CO2 figure of 132g/km, resulting in a range average of about 1160km. Its Urban/Extra Urban figures are 5.5/4.7L/100km respectively.

And, finally, there’s the P50e 2.5L PHEV, offering a theoretical 2.1L/100km, for a CO2 figure of just 49g/km, for an unlikely range average of 2380km from its 50L tank, though on 95 RON premium unleaded brew.

Out in the real world, and mostly driven harder than a typical owner might, the trip computer in the PHEV showed low sevens, while the diesel displayed mid-eights and the petrol high nines, which aren’t too bad at all.

Honda claims the ZR-V hybrid consumes an average of 5.0L/100km on the combined cycle, according to ADR testing.

In practice, I’ve seen way less than this, which is fantastic. On one particular drive around the city I achieved a mind-boggling average of 3.7L/100km, but my overall average hovered around 4.5L/100km.

There is a 57L fuel tank and a minimum of 91 RON regular unleaded petrol is required.

You should easily be able to travel more than 1000km per refill, so don’t expect to be visiting servos very often.

This is the acid test. Does the CX-60 drive like a Mazda should?

In the engine department, definitely.

The changes that Mazda has made to the transmission calibration means that it no longer hunts indecisively between ratios like it used to, and that results in smoother shifts as well as a more relaxed driving experience.

And that's across the range, whether we're talking about the six-cylinder diesel or petrol, or four-pot plug-in hybrid. And the latter brings the biggest surprise, because the changes made to the gearbox have resulted in a much more pleasant car around town, with no more shunting or jerky movements to contend with.

And then there's the ride, which is palpably softer than before. The suspension is significantly more pliable and comfortable as a consequence, offering better bump absorption, improved control at speed and basically just a more refined experience. We tried several of the Lang Lang Proving Ground’s rough-road tests, which the CX-60 sailed over without any of the hard jarring of the previous model, which Mazda helpfully provided for back-to-back assessments.

So, how does all that translate in everyday driving?

Well, the latest CX-60 is way more comfortable to ride in across the board, it handles and corners with greater control and linearity, seems quieter and it's just a suppler experience overall.

As there was so much that was good with the original CX-60 anyway, including muscular performance from the inline six-cylinder turbos, impressive high-speed stability and exceptional body control through fast turns, the modifications for 2025 do much to elevate an already good thing.

So, it's a win-win situation. If you are in the market for a sub-premium, mid-sized SUV with performance and space, as well as newfound comfort and sophistication, you can do a lot worse than check out the CX-60. It is that much better than before.

The ZR-V’s hybrid powertrain has oodles of zip, thanks to there being two electric motors which handle a lot of the low-speed grunt.

It’s surprising how much of the driving can be done on electric power alone, provided there’s enough battery charge. Even at highway and freeway speeds the engine will switch off and coast on electric power alone.

When the petrol engine kicks on, you can barely feel it in the cabin or through the accelerator pedal. Instead you’ll only hear a familiar CVT-like drone as the engine charges the battery.

The petrol engine drone is noticeable but the note it makes more pleasant than a Toyota hybrid. Plus when you push the accelerator that bit harder it pretends to shift through gears, making the driving experience more engaging.

At higher speeds there’s plenty of oomph as the petrol engine and electric motors work in tandem. It feels like the powertrain is never stressed, making for an effortless touring feel.

There are a number of different regenerative braking modes accessed via the paddle shifters. The default is the weakest which allows you to coast more like a regular, pure-combustion car.

You can ramp up the intensity of the regenerative braking but there is no 'one-pedal' driving mode and you’re required to use the brake pedal to come to a complete stop.

From the driver’s seat you have a commanding view of the road ahead thanks to the elevated driving position. There are also large side mirrors and a big rear envelope, giving good all-around visibility.

Around town the ZR-V has a nimble feel thanks to its light-ish steering. This translates to a dynamic feel with a touch more weight out on the open road.

It’s surprising how engaging and fun this car is to drive, especially because it’s a regular SUV with no obvious sporty characteristics.

The suspension errs towards soft, but this helps soak up sharper bumps. This car never feels uncomfortable from behind the wheel which is at least partially down to the 18-inch alloy wheels being the right diameter for a car of this size.

The Honda ZR-V received a four- out of five-star ANCAP safety rating based on testing conducted by Euro NCAP in 2023.

Despite this, the entire line-up is stacked with standard safety equipment. Highlights include 11 airbags, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, front and rear parking sensors as well as a reversing camera.

It’s worth noting a surround-view camera is reserved for the top-spec hybrid trim only, which is a little annoying.

However, the ZR-V doesn’t have any annoying beeps and bongs that play while you’re driving. All the safety systems are well calibrated and only interact or engage when required.

Mazda could also do a bit better with its warranty nowadays, since its five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance is decidedly average.

Service intervals are at 12 months or every 15,000km, while a fixed-price service scheme is available, starting from $463 per service depending on powertrain. That’s for the petrol. The diesels start from $500 while the PHEVs commence from $435.

ZR-V owners receive a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty as standard, whereas the high-voltage battery is covered for eight years.

If you service at Honda dealers when required, however, the standard warranty coverage is extended to eight years. This is more on par with many mainstream brands.

Speaking of servicing, it’s required every 12 months or 10,000km. The latter may be troublesome if you do a lot of kilometres.

The first five services are capped at $199. This is very affordable and on par with Toyota.

There are close to 90 'Honda Centres' across the country covering state and territory capitals as well as key rural and regional centres.