Mazda CX-60 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio

What's the difference?

Have no doubts. The MY25 version of the CX-60 is the SUV that Mazda should have launched in Australia in 2023.

It fulfils the promise of its sophisticated specification, builds on the extensive dynamic abilities of previous models, and now provides a compelling – and unique – choice for medium-SUV buyers who do not need an extended seven-seater.

It may still looks a bit daggy from some angles outside, and we’d like a little bit less suspension noise on the inside, but the CX-60 should now be on Australian family-car shortlists.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Veloce is the car you get when you want a sports car but happen to have a kid or two. Its ride comfort is on the lower end but it has heaps of power and enough features that it manages to slide into its price tag without feeling too cheeky. The back seat’s size will limit this to smaller families, though. And I would prefer to see better tech at this grade level, so this gets a 7.1/10 from me.

My son didn’t spend much time in this one but he liked the red paintwork. My mum, however, loved the power and sexy packaging. She gives it an 8/10.

If you’re searching for something new in the looks department for the CX-60, you won’t find it, since this is essentially the same car as last year’s model from the outside. Except there’s a new beige colour option.

Which means the same long-bonnet/cab-backward silhouette remains, along with the corporate wing-motif grille, hunched-over styling (that looks awkward from some angles) and short rear overhangs.

Still, the overall effect remains modern, clean and distinct from the nearly-identical and very closely-related CX-70, CX-80 and CX-90 further up the Mazda food chain.

Note that the CX-60 is usefully larger than the CX-5, with the former coming in at 4740mm long, 1890mm wide, 1675mm tall and 2870mm in wheelbase length, compared to the latter’s 4575mm, 1845mm, 1680mm and 2700mm dimensions respectively.

Which, of course, elevates it from an interior point of view.

While the Veloce has had a facelift, the changes are so minor I would dare to ask, why bother?

The daytime running light signature has been tweaked but only die-hard Stelvio fans will notice it. I do like the larger 12.3-inch digital instrument display but surprisingly the multimedia screen remains on the smaller side at 8.8 inches.

Otherwise, there’s no denying the Veloce looks like an Alfa Romeo, staying true to its Italian heritage. It’s solid, with a 1903mm wide stance, but so robust that it moves away from words like 'sleek' or 'sexy'.

The black grille, 20-inch alloy wheels and red brake calipers make it look sports car mean and hint at what's under the bonnet.

The interior looks well made and it's got a bat cave element with the black headliner and panoramic sunroof. There's a plethora of soft touchpoints throughout and the circular air-vents found in both rows add some flair.

Overall, though, the interior is understated and if you’re looking for something as flashy as the exterior, you may be disappointed.

Like the exterior, the changes for the MY25 CX-60 are pretty much under the skin, with improved noise/vibration and harshness-quelling measures to quieten things down more.

And an exhaust-sound enhancer through the audio system to liven things up if you desire.

Representing the aforementioned $10K saving over the previous entry-level Evolve, the Pure does possess less opulent trim and (nice) cloth seat fabrics, but otherwise the CX-60 does present a larger-than-usual cabin environment compared to smaller medium-sized SUVs.

But fans of big, showy screens may be underwhelmed.

The dash is elegant but somewhat old-fashioned, especially compared to, say, the latest BMW X3’s dazzling displays. It feels like a hangover from last decade’s CX-9.

Yet there’s no denying how satisfyingly easy and logical most of it is, from the super-clear, electronic instrumentation to the simple and effective climate control layout, while the iDrive-style rotary controller means less time with eyes off the road. Safe, intuitive ergonomics. Thank you, Mazda.

Additionally, there’s a quality solidness to the fit and finish that elevates the social-climbing Mazda beyond what a CX-5 could achieve.

All the essentials are also well thought out, from storage and vision out to ventilation and, not least of all, space and seat support, especially when sat on over long distances.

That also carries over to the expansive back-seat environment, with air vents, USB ports, lighting, cupholders and grab handles. The CX-60 is an SUV that a family could grow into without it feeling excessive.

Is this ‘big-medium’ or ‘small-large’ sized?

From the boot’s perspective, either fits, and is one of the reasons why you might consider stepping up to a CX-60. The floor is low, wide, flat and easy to load, as well as beautifully finished.

The 40/20/40 split fold backrests can be folded remotely via Mazda’s Karakuri function, boosting capacity from 477 litres (VDA) to 1726L, while the in-line six-cylinder models have a space-saver spare wheel underneath, leaving PHEV owners with an inadequate tyre repair kit.

The front row benefits the most in terms of space and features. I have stacks of headroom and legroom in the front seat and didn’t feel like I was too close to my passenger this week.

I like the comfortable electric seats and the fact you can adjust the side bolsters and under-thigh support.

Individual storage options are on the slim side throughout the car and it was something my mum and I found annoying on our road trip because there aren’t a lot of spots to put your little items up front. Think snacks, sunglasses, lip balm etc.

The two cupholders are really drink bottle holders because they’re too large to fit a small takeaway cup without popping the lid off but I like the large storage bins in each front door.

It's a tight squeeze in the back seat for my 168cm (5'6") height and that’s behind my driving position! It could feel a tad cramped back there for those with longer legs.

It’s also a bit awkward getting in and out of the back seat because of the large wheel arches.

The storage bins in the doors are too small to hold a drink bottle but the middle armrest has two cupholders and a phone holder.

Charging options are fantastic up front with two USB-A ports, one USB-C port, a 12-volt socket and a wireless charging pad to choose from. You even get an 'aux' jack, too.

The amenities in the back seat are okay and you get a couple of net map pockets, reading lights, a USB-A and C port, as well as directional air vents.

This Alfa has a no-nonsense approach with the other tech, though. I usually don’t mind that but the touchscreen multimedia system is a little too no-nonsense for this spec-level.

I found it to be laggy and too small. It also regularly turned itself off and rebooted. This happened a few times while needing satellite navigation directions, which was annoying.

Also on the sat nav, you can’t search for a general name of something, like a business, you have to input an address which meant using my iPhone anyway. It’s great that you get wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, though.

The digital instrument panel looks upmarket but isn’t properly customisable and I was disappointed the ambient lighting package only meant that there are lights in the footwells and a tiny overhead light. Adding some extra lighting would have transformed the night-time driving experience.

The boot is the highlight for me because you get a decent capacity at 499L. The load space is level and I like the back row's 40/20/40 split-fold. We had plenty of room on our road trip for luggage and shopping.

You get a temporary spare tyre and a retractable cargo blind. The latter is stiff enough to double as a shelf which is handy and a handsfree powered tailgate comes standard, as well.

There are three models for the Stelvio and ours is the mid-spec Veloce grade, which will cost you $82,950, before on-road costs. The pricing should make it competitive compared to its rivals but the features list isn’t as robust as it could be.

The interior gets most of the big-ticket items with leather upholstered sports front seats, extended leather trim on the doors and dashboard as well as a heated steering wheel.

Both front seats are electric with six-way power adjustment, powered side bolsters and four-way adjustable lumbar support. They also feature a heat function and extendable under-thigh support.

The luxury items continue with the panoramic sunroof, real aluminium accents throughout and a premium Harman Kardon sound system that boasts 14 speakers.

Other standard features include full LED adaptive 'Matrix' headlights, aluminium sports pedals, dual-zone climate control, keyless entry, push-button start and a handsfree powered tailgate.

It's the technology that lets the Stelvio down but I'll go into that later.

For now, the base engine is the 209kW/450Nm G40e, a 3.3-litre turbo-petrol ‘six’ delivering the sort of healthy power figures that late-model Commodore and Falcon buyers would appreciate.

There’s also the 187kW/550Nm D50e turbo-diesel version, for extra pulling power and economy, and we’re getting into premium Euro territory here, because both offer a 48-volt, mild-hybrid system, employing a small electric motor located behind the engine to boost torque yet cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

Mazda says new motor control and clutch slip control software facilitates “…smoother transitions as the electric motor is activated and deactivated”. We hope so!

Last but not least, there’s the 241kW/500Nm P50e plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrain, combining the familiar 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a larger, 129kW electric motor powered by a 17.8kWh Lithium ion battery. The latter allows up to 76km of pure-electric driving, and can be recharged either by regenerative braking when driving or plugged into a Type 2 port.

All three engines use a revised eight-speed, wet multi-plate-clutch automatic transmission, still driving the rear or, as traction and/or performance needs arise, all four wheels.

Yep, this is essentially a rear-drive-biased family SUV, with a sophisticated double wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up to keep everything in line.

So, what’s changed underneath compared to last year’s CX-60?

Among the modifications are stiffer dampers and softer rear springs to address ride-comfort issues with the old car; relocated front knuckle mounts; altered rear axle bushes and the removal of the rear anti-roll bar for more stable control; shorter rear bump stops for greater suspension travel; an extra joint in the steering column quells vibrations while updated software improves steering feel and electronic stability control operation. The goal is for noticeably smoother, comfier and more linear dynamics. 

Result? To find out how much better or worse Mazda’s latest mid-sized SUV is, we drove the it in a variety of conditions, from the push-and-shove of Melbourne’s bumper-to-bumper peak-hour traffic, to a series of demanding emergency-swerve and multi-speed ride and handling test manoeuvres at the legendary Lang Lang proving ground that shaped so many of our iconic Holdens.

More on that a bit later on.

The Veloce has a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine that gives a maximum power output of 206kW and 400Nm of torque. It’s an all-wheel drive and has an eight-speed auto transmission which is very smooth. 

Checking out the specs I didn’t think this would be as powerful as it is. But it’s really fun when you need to put your foot down! I mean, it can go from 0-100km/h in just 5.7 seconds.

One area where the Mazda did not need fixing is in its fuel economy.

All of the CX-60’s powertrains are rated at Euro 5.

Officially, the G40e 3.3-litre petrol averages 7.4L/100km, on the combined cycle, and emits 174 grams per kilometre of CO2. Urban and Extra Urban numbers are 9.9L/100km and 6.0L/100km.

Fitted with a 58L petrol tank, expect an average range of around 780km. And it will run on standard 91 RON unleaded petrol to boot.

Moving on to the D50e 3.3L diesel, it manages an impressive 5.0L/100km, for a CO2 figure of 132g/km, resulting in a range average of about 1160km. Its Urban/Extra Urban figures are 5.5/4.7L/100km respectively.

And, finally, there’s the P50e 2.5L PHEV, offering a theoretical 2.1L/100km, for a CO2 figure of just 49g/km, for an unlikely range average of 2380km from its 50L tank, though on 95 RON premium unleaded brew.

Out in the real world, and mostly driven harder than a typical owner might, the trip computer in the PHEV showed low sevens, while the diesel displayed mid-eights and the petrol high nines, which aren’t too bad at all.

The official combined cycle fuel economy figure is 7.0L/100km and my real-world usage came to 8.4L/100km.

I drove our test model hard but did A LOT of open road driving - 2051km to be exact - so I was happy with the average but I would expect it to be higher in the city.

Based on the official combined cycle number and 64L fuel tank, you theoretically should be able to get a driving range of around 914km but my real-world tests see that figure come in closer to 700km.

Alfa Romeo recommends a minimum 95 RON petrol be used for the Stelvio.

This is the acid test. Does the CX-60 drive like a Mazda should?

In the engine department, definitely.

The changes that Mazda has made to the transmission calibration means that it no longer hunts indecisively between ratios like it used to, and that results in smoother shifts as well as a more relaxed driving experience.

And that's across the range, whether we're talking about the six-cylinder diesel or petrol, or four-pot plug-in hybrid. And the latter brings the biggest surprise, because the changes made to the gearbox have resulted in a much more pleasant car around town, with no more shunting or jerky movements to contend with.

And then there's the ride, which is palpably softer than before. The suspension is significantly more pliable and comfortable as a consequence, offering better bump absorption, improved control at speed and basically just a more refined experience. We tried several of the Lang Lang Proving Ground’s rough-road tests, which the CX-60 sailed over without any of the hard jarring of the previous model, which Mazda helpfully provided for back-to-back assessments.

So, how does all that translate in everyday driving?

Well, the latest CX-60 is way more comfortable to ride in across the board, it handles and corners with greater control and linearity, seems quieter and it's just a suppler experience overall.

As there was so much that was good with the original CX-60 anyway, including muscular performance from the inline six-cylinder turbos, impressive high-speed stability and exceptional body control through fast turns, the modifications for 2025 do much to elevate an already good thing.

So, it's a win-win situation. If you are in the market for a sub-premium, mid-sized SUV with performance and space, as well as newfound comfort and sophistication, you can do a lot worse than check out the CX-60. It is that much better than before.

The Veloce is downright fun to drive because of how damn responsive it is. There is plenty of power, so much so, that you’ll look forward to hitting the open road. 

The sporty steering makes for sharp handling and the car moves decisively. I have felt confident all week that it would do what I wanted it to do. It's wide stance also makes it hug the road like an old friend.

However, the suspension is also sporty, aka firm! The padded seats help soften the impact when you hit a bump but you’ll still know it when you hit one. There's also a resonating 'ker-thump' in the cabin, in case you didn't feel it.

The big thing that marred the driving experience for me, at least for a longer trip, is how loud road and wind noise are at higher speeds. It’s loud enough that you need to raise your voice to talk, which I didn’t enjoy.

The Veloce earns back points with how easy it is to park and it handles those stupidly small hotel car parks extremely well.

I don't rate the reversing camera, though. The quality of the image is terrible for this grade-level.

The Stelvio has most of the major items that I like to see on a family car and the standard safety features include adaptive cruise control, forward collision warning, driver attention monitor, traffic sign recognition, lane keeping aids, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, a reversing camera, daytime-running lights, front and rear parking sensors, and a tyre pressure monitoring system.

It's important to note though that the safety systems only scored a 60 per cent with ANCAP.

It has autonomous emergency braking with pedestrian and car detection and is operational from 7.0 - 200km/h.

The Veloce has a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating but it was done ages ago in 2017, which means it will expire this December. It also only has six airbags, which is low for a family car but the curtain airbags cover the back row.

There are ISOFIX child seat mounts on the outboard rear seats and three top tethers in the second row but two seats will fit best.

You can just squeeze a 0-4 rearward facing child seat in but it will encroach on front passenger comfort.

Mazda could also do a bit better with its warranty nowadays, since its five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance is decidedly average.

Service intervals are at 12 months or every 15,000km, while a fixed-price service scheme is available, starting from $463 per service depending on powertrain. That’s for the petrol. The diesels start from $500 while the PHEVs commence from $435.

The ongoing costs aren’t too shabby on the Stelvio because it comes with a five-year/unlimited km warranty and you also get five years roadside assistance.

It’s a 24/7 complimentary service that covers a host of items but check out the terms and conditions for more information.

There’s capped priced servicing for five years or up to 75,000km, whichever occurs first.

Services cost an average of $573, which is competitive for the class and servicing intervals are good at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first.