Browse over 9,000 car reviews
What's the difference?
The idea of a Tesla that can tow sounds about as likely as an astrophysicist with three Olympic gold medals, who also moonlights as a hand model.
The EV brand has blazed a trail for every other mainstream and premium car manufacturer to jump on the electric bandwagon, and today they’ve still got the biggest batteries and most impressive range ratings, while also having the most extensive extensive network of charge stations made up of Superchargers and destination chargers, covering every state and territory.
They’re not perfect though, often displaying niggling build quality issues and production delays for upcoming models. There’s also a degree of uncertainty bred by a founder who flits between the modern-day space race, manufacturing flame throwers and offering to send miniature submarines to rescue stranded children.
But there’s no questioning the overall impact Tesla has had on the automotive industry, along with the incredible brand awareness and aspiration it’s generated from non-enthusiast Joe Average consumers around the world.
The Model X is also rated to tow, with a decent 2250kg braked rating and an integrated tow bar that folds out of sight when not in use, which both fits its SUV character and encourages you to give it a go.
The 2024 Toyota LandCruiser Prado was unveiled in early August and it's set to land in Australia in mid-2024.
It's the first all-new Prado in 14 years and it has many people very excited but, with delays blowing out customer wait-times for new vehicles, is a current seven-seat Prado the better option for you?
Read on.
After nearly 700km of testing with both cars, it’s fair to say that the Tesla is indeed a capable tow vehicle, provided you keep the distances relatively short and plan around charge station locations.
Overall average - Penrith to Bathurst to Penrith
Fuel and energy consumption will always depend on the driving conditions, which is why we chose different routes for each leg of our testing.
Averaged across the two legs, towing the caravan with the Model X used 101 per cent more energy than without, or halved its driving range, which sounds a bit scary.
The LandCruiser by comparison added 63 per cent on average, which is still a big difference, but matters less in the real world when its big fuel tanks would still give you about 760km of driving range, which can be refilled quickly at any diesel-stocked servo.
So you could do a weekend trip with the caravan from Penrith with one supercharge in Bathurst, but it would’ve been highly unlikely to manage the extra 55km if you were leaving from Sydney CBD.
The bottom line is that there’s plenty of things - like smaller camper trailers - lighter than our caravan that will help the Tesla to do the towing job better right now.
Compared to the ‘Cruiser, the Tesla is a lesson in the benefits of a lower centre of gravity and road-focused handling.
As always, bigger batteries and more recharge points will go a long way to rectifying the Tesla’s towing shortcomings, and I'm sure we'll get there eventually.
But no matter what, its acceleration performance under load is simply excellent.
Thanks to our friends at Avida for making this test possible with the use of the 17-foot Avida Wave Tourer Electric Pop-Top single-axle caravan. They can also be reached on 1300 428 432.
The Kakadu treatment adds a welcome prestige to the Prado which is already a functional, comfortable daily driver and a very capable 4WD tourer as is.
It's reliably effective off-road and though it lacks the over-the-top macho appeal of something like the 70 Series LandCruiser, it still makes a very appealing platform as a touring vehicle. But this flat-tailgate Kakadu, minus the extra fuel capacity of a Prado with the tailgate-mounted spare, loses tourer appeal due to that fact.
If you choose to opt for a lower-spec Prado you'll forgo some nice Kakadu features – such as KDSS – but it'll still be a Prado after all. Money saved can be spent on aftermarket gear to fit out your new adventure machine.
Or you can wait in line with everyone else for the 2024 Prado...
Energy consumption is just one element of a tow vehicle though, with stability, braking and acceleration performance being the most important details.
The big ‘Cruiser is always a safe bet for towing heavy loads, but it's fair to say its off-road ability, tall body and short wheelbase mean it could be better on the road, and the Tesla goes some way to proving that.
With all those batteries mounted nice and low, the Tesla is significantly more stable with 1.7 tonnes on the back than the LandCruiser, in all conditions. It’s also helped by that longer wheelbase.
The Tesla’s airbag suspension is another surprise advantage, and while it can be a bit choppy around town over minor bumps, bigger bumps on the highway are soaked up really nicely and it all settles quicker than with the LandCruiser - even with the caravan on the back.
Tesla is famous for instant acceleration at any speed, and this effect remains when towing. The LandCruiser’s twin-turbo V8 (with max torque available from 1600-2600rpm) has long been a benchmark for tow vehicles, but the Model X makes it feel sluggish by comparison.
You know how caravan vehicles are usually the slow ones up hills? This time, we were the ones doing the overtaking, even up the steep bends heading out of Lithgow. To overtake, it just takes the slightest flex of your right foot.
Clearly there’s a big caveat though when it comes to how much energy it’s consuming while you’re enjoying that performance, and it’s deceptive because it doesn’t make any more noise like a conventional engine when you’re pushing it.
You’d also think the weight of the van would overcome the engine-braking effect of the regenerative brakes, but they are still very effective at conserving your brakes downhill and preventing the car from running away from you, and no doubt giving the batteries a bigger boost at the same time.
On that note, the LandCruiser’s cruise control also does a great job of witholding speed on downhill runs, proactively dropping gears to engine brake enough to keep the Avida Wave in check.
The Kakadu is an easy-driving and very comfortable 4WD wagon.
It's quiet inside the Prado with most external noise kept to a muffled hum.
Steering has a nice weight to it, although it can feel a bit floaty if you're used to a more tightly controlled vehicle. The driver can dial-in their position as the steering wheel is electric tilt-and-telescopic adjustable.
The Kakadu has a 11.6m turning circle and feels nimble along crowded streets and in busy regional centres.
The 2.8 litre turbo-diesel engine and transmission pairing is an unhurried, almost sluggish combination, yielding a relaxed drive experience, but acceleration is gutsy enough to punch the Prado off the mark and get it moving at pace to overtake when needed.
Brakes – ventilated discs at each corner – were able to bring the 2.3 tonne Prado to a rapid controlled stop every time I stomped them into submission during my patented ‘Watch out for that kangaroo!' emergency-braking tests on dry and wet bitumen.
One of the Kakadu's major points of difference with lower-spec Prados is that it has Toyota's 'Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System' (KDSS), which helps iron out most ride and handling irregularities.
KDSS hydraulically alters tension on the sway bars to suit the terrain; on-road, it tightens them for reduced body roll and more dynamic handling, and off-road it loosens them for greater wheel travel to further improve performance.
The Kakadu also has adaptive variable suspension which can be set to one of three modes ('Comfort', 'Normal' or 'Sport') via an in-cabin switch to help dial-in smooth and well-sorted ride and handling; and its height-adjustable rear air suspension with switchable low, normal or high modes.
The Kakadu's Dunlop Grandtrek AT30 tyres (265/55 R19) are well-suited to on-road driving, but fall a bit short, performance-wise, when 4WDing.
On the loose-gravel dirt track that leads to my unofficial 4WD testing ground, the route had been gouged by deep ruts from recent rains. The Kakadu managed it all well.
And a lot of the credit of that controlled ride and handling is due to KDSS, loosening swaybars to suit the terrain, allowing axles full-stretch articulation as required.
And that's very handy at low speeds when sustaining safe and controlled momentum via maximised traction is the goal.
And this was even more evident when I tackled my favourite set-piece rocky hill-climbs.
The Kakadu trucked over the undulating ground at low revs and with wheels dipping and rising as they stuck to the dirt. Wheel travel in a standard Prado is fine but the KDSS-equipped Kakadu gets even more flex on the move.
It conquered everything with impressive ease, only ever scrambling momentarily for grip because of its tyres.
Swap those with a decent set of all-terrains and you'd instantly make a great off-roader even better.
Steering retains a nice balance at low speeds, throttle response is good (not touchy over bumpy terrain), the driver has plenty of visibility (crucial for low-range highly technical 4WDing that relies so heavily on choosing the correct line) and the Kakadu's dimensions offer off-road angles – of 30.4 degrees (approach), 21.2 (ramp-over) and 23.5 (departure) – that are good for a cityfied SUV wagon.
The Kakadu has plenty of torque across a wide rev range, and front, centre and rear locking differentials.
It also has a raft of driver-assist tech, including crawl control (low-speed low-range cruise control/traction control with five selectable speeds), and 'Multi-Terrain Select' (with off-road driving modes that adjust steering, throttle and traction control to suit the terrain you're on, e.g. rock and dirt, mud and sand etc).
Towing capacity is 750kg (unbraked) and 3000kg (braked).
The Kakadu has a gross vehicle mass (GVM) of 2990kg and a GCM (gross combined mass) of 5990kg.
For reference, towing capacity on the 2024 Prado is tipped to be 3500kg (braked), but, at time of writing, this was unconfirmed.