Hyundai Kona vs Mazda CX-60

What's the difference?

It’s easy to see why the Hyundai Kona leads the Aussie small SUV category, with this hybrid version enhancing the car’s abilities in key areas. Sharply priced and well-specified, comfortable and practical with a hugely efficient powertrain as well as refined dynamic performance. It’s a compelling package. 

Have no doubts. The MY25 version of the CX-60 is the SUV that Mazda should have launched in Australia in 2023.

It fulfils the promise of its sophisticated specification, builds on the extensive dynamic abilities of previous models, and now provides a compelling – and unique – choice for medium-SUV buyers who do not need an extended seven-seater.

It may still looks a bit daggy from some angles outside, and we’d like a little bit less suspension noise on the inside, but the CX-60 should now be on Australian family-car shortlists.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The Kona’s exterior mixes smooth curves across its softly rounded nose and swollen haunches with sharp lines and geometric shapes in the lower grille, wheel arches and rear bumper.

And when the current, second-generation version arrived in mid-2023 it swapped out its predecessor’s already slimline LED daytime running lights for an even thinner strip running the width of the car, in similar fashion to the Hyundai Sonata sedan and Staria people mover.

The single line light signature is repeated with the tail-lights, a brake, reversing and indicator cluster confined to the outer rear edges.

Throw in a conspicuous diagonal character line across the doors, and bright metallic accents making a visual connection between the top of the tailgate and the lower edge of the side glass and there’s a lot going on. 

Always a subjective call, but I don’t mind the Kona’s design, although our test car’s ‘Mirage Green’ paint finish leaves me (and my significant other) cold.

Inside, the colour palette is uniformly grey which contributes to a restrained, relatively low-key feel, although light trim for the headliner and pillar covers brightens the mood somewhat.

The dash treatment is cool and contemporary, comprising a wide wrap-around instrument and media screen panel next to a narrow tray on the passenger side.

Fit and finish is impressive and details like perforated centre panels on the leather-faced seats dial up the premium feel.

If you’re searching for something new in the looks department for the CX-60, you won’t find it, since this is essentially the same car as last year’s model from the outside. Except there’s a new beige colour option.

Which means the same long-bonnet/cab-backward silhouette remains, along with the corporate wing-motif grille, hunched-over styling (that looks awkward from some angles) and short rear overhangs.

Still, the overall effect remains modern, clean and distinct from the nearly-identical and very closely-related CX-70, CX-80 and CX-90 further up the Mazda food chain.

Note that the CX-60 is usefully larger than the CX-5, with the former coming in at 4740mm long, 1890mm wide, 1675mm tall and 2870mm in wheelbase length, compared to the latter’s 4575mm, 1845mm, 1680mm and 2700mm dimensions respectively.

Which, of course, elevates it from an interior point of view.

Even though the Kona measures a relatively modest 4350mm end-to-end, it offers up copious amounts of interior space. Dr Who would be proud.

Lots of breathing room up front, with the ‘shift-by-wire’ auto transmission shifter’s location on the steering column freeing up extra space in the centre console.

There’s a lidded bin between the seats (the padded top of which doubles as a centre armrest) with an open tray the size of a shoebox in front of it (which includes a pair of swivel-out bottle or cupholders) as well as a wireless phone charging bay ahead of that.

Generous bins in the doors include a recess for large bottles, plus there’s a decent glove box on the passenger side and a handy open tray above it. Plenty of room to keep the bits and pieces of everyday life under control.

Power and connectivity for the driver and passenger runs to two USB-C sockets and a (180W) 12-volt outlet.

Switching to the back is where the Tardis factor steps up a notch, the Kona offering space more in line with a next-size-up medium SUV.

Sitting behind the driver’s seat set to my 183cm position there’s loads of leg and headroom and even enough shoulder room for three adults to get to know one another on shorter journeys. A close to flat floor also helps with foot room in the centre position. Worth noting the rear seat backrests recline slightly for extra comfort options.

No door bins as such but, again, there are recesses for bottles. Netted map pockets on the front seat backs are helpful as is a fold-down centre armrest, which includes a pair of cupholders.

Individual air vents for back-seaters (in the rear of the front centre console) is always a welcome inclusion, and there’s a small oddments tray underneath them. Another pair of USB-C sockets will keep devices charged.

Boot capacity is healthy at a class-competitive 407 litres (VDA), expanding to 1241L with the 60/40 split-folding second row seat folded.

There are storage wells behind the rear wheel tubs, multiple bag hooks and four tie-down anchors to help keep loads secure.

There’s a temporary space-saver spare under the boot floor, which gets a tick over the increasingly common repair kit option and you’ll be able to tow a 1.3-tonne braked trailer (600kg unbraked).

Like the exterior, the changes for the MY25 CX-60 are pretty much under the skin, with improved noise/vibration and harshness-quelling measures to quieten things down more.

And an exhaust-sound enhancer through the audio system to liven things up if you desire.

Representing the aforementioned $10K saving over the previous entry-level Evolve, the Pure does possess less opulent trim and (nice) cloth seat fabrics, but otherwise the CX-60 does present a larger-than-usual cabin environment compared to smaller medium-sized SUVs.

But fans of big, showy screens may be underwhelmed.

The dash is elegant but somewhat old-fashioned, especially compared to, say, the latest BMW X3’s dazzling displays. It feels like a hangover from last decade’s CX-9.

Yet there’s no denying how satisfyingly easy and logical most of it is, from the super-clear, electronic instrumentation to the simple and effective climate control layout, while the iDrive-style rotary controller means less time with eyes off the road. Safe, intuitive ergonomics. Thank you, Mazda.

Additionally, there’s a quality solidness to the fit and finish that elevates the social-climbing Mazda beyond what a CX-5 could achieve.

All the essentials are also well thought out, from storage and vision out to ventilation and, not least of all, space and seat support, especially when sat on over long distances.

That also carries over to the expansive back-seat environment, with air vents, USB ports, lighting, cupholders and grab handles. The CX-60 is an SUV that a family could grow into without it feeling excessive.

Is this ‘big-medium’ or ‘small-large’ sized?

From the boot’s perspective, either fits, and is one of the reasons why you might consider stepping up to a CX-60. The floor is low, wide, flat and easy to load, as well as beautifully finished.

The 40/20/40 split fold backrests can be folded remotely via Mazda’s Karakuri function, boosting capacity from 477 litres (VDA) to 1726L, while the in-line six-cylinder models have a space-saver spare wheel underneath, leaving PHEV owners with an inadequate tyre repair kit.

Starting from $50,240 (all prices are before on-road costs) for the Pure grade in G40e six-cylinder turbo-petrol-powered guise that should account for nearly half of all sales, this is the new base grade.

It has lost some items compared to the previous entry-level Evolve, but remains a decently-equipped proposition.

Included are LED headlights with auto high beams, keyless entry/start, dual-zone climate control, cloth trim, a 10.25-inch display/touchscreen, a 360-degree view camera, front/rear parking sensors, satellite navigation, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, DAB+ digital radio, eight-speaker audio, vehicle-exit warning, folding/heated exterior mirrors and 18-inch alloy wheels.

There’s also a decent level of advanced driver-assist safety technology like autonomous emergency braking, lane-support systems and adaptive cruise control. More on those later.

Moving up to the Evolve from $55,240 scores you a larger touchscreen (12.3-inches), ground-view monitor, artificial leather trim, a wireless charger, powered tailgate and a few extra safety features like front-cross traffic alert and a driver monitor, while the new Touring grade from $58,240 gains leather trim and heated/powered front seats with driver’s side memory.

Climbing up to the GT from $64,240 adds adaptive LED headlights, panoramic sunroof, Bose 12-speaker audio upgrade, a powered/heated steering wheel, hands-free tailgate operation, heated rear seats, glossier trim and 20-inch alloys, while the Azami from $68,440 includes Nappa leather, glitzier finishes, vented front seats and more.

Speaking of more, $2000 extra buys you a white interior with unique woven textiles (Azami Takumi pack) or a sportier tan colour edition (Azami SP pack).

Want more economy? Diesel adds another $2000 while going for the PHEV powertrain ups that by a whopping $11,050 across all grades. We’re grateful for the choice, Mazda.

These certainly sound expensive for a mid-sized SUV from Japan, but the CX-60 is considerably larger and roomier than, say, a CX-5 or Toyota RAV4, and possesses a level of sophisticated engineering that puts it in Audi Q5, BMW X3, Lexus NX, Mercedes-Benz GLC and Volvo XC60 territory – and the least-expensive of these kicks off from upwards of $20,000 more, depending on spec.

As a sub-luxury premium proposition, then, the CX-60 lives in a sort of no-man’s land. Yet its styling certainly reveals where Mazda’s aspirations lie.

The Kona Hybrid is powered by a naturally aspirated 1.6-litre, four-cylinder petrol engine working in concert with a single electric motor, both driving the front wheels through a six-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission.

The all-alloy engine features dual variable valve timing and direct-injection to produce 77kW at 5700rpm and 144Nm at 4000rpm, the permanent magnet synchronous motor chipping in with 32kW/170Nm for a total combined outputs of 104kW/265Nm.

That power output is in the middle of the small hybrid SUV pack and torque is at the higher end. 

Kerb weight is a fraction over 1.5 tonnes and you can expect 0-100km/h acceleration in the high 10-second range with a top speed around 170km/h.

For now, the base engine is the 209kW/450Nm G40e, a 3.3-litre turbo-petrol ‘six’ delivering the sort of healthy power figures that late-model Commodore and Falcon buyers would appreciate.

There’s also the 187kW/550Nm D50e turbo-diesel version, for extra pulling power and economy, and we’re getting into premium Euro territory here, because both offer a 48-volt, mild-hybrid system, employing a small electric motor located behind the engine to boost torque yet cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

Mazda says new motor control and clutch slip control software facilitates “…smoother transitions as the electric motor is activated and deactivated”. We hope so!

Last but not least, there’s the 241kW/500Nm P50e plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrain, combining the familiar 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a larger, 129kW electric motor powered by a 17.8kWh Lithium ion battery. The latter allows up to 76km of pure-electric driving, and can be recharged either by regenerative braking when driving or plugged into a Type 2 port.

All three engines use a revised eight-speed, wet multi-plate-clutch automatic transmission, still driving the rear or, as traction and/or performance needs arise, all four wheels.

Yep, this is essentially a rear-drive-biased family SUV, with a sophisticated double wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up to keep everything in line.

So, what’s changed underneath compared to last year’s CX-60?

Among the modifications are stiffer dampers and softer rear springs to address ride-comfort issues with the old car; relocated front knuckle mounts; altered rear axle bushes and the removal of the rear anti-roll bar for more stable control; shorter rear bump stops for greater suspension travel; an extra joint in the steering column quells vibrations while updated software improves steering feel and electronic stability control operation. The goal is for noticeably smoother, comfier and more linear dynamics. 

Result? To find out how much better or worse Mazda’s latest mid-sized SUV is, we drove the it in a variety of conditions, from the push-and-shove of Melbourne’s bumper-to-bumper peak-hour traffic, to a series of demanding emergency-swerve and multi-speed ride and handling test manoeuvres at the legendary Lang Lang proving ground that shaped so many of our iconic Holdens.

More on that a bit later on.

Hyundai’s official fuel consumption figure for the Kona Hybrid Elite, on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle is a miserly 3.9L/100km, the 1.6L engine emitting 89g/km of CO2 in the process.

Minimum fuel requirement is 91 RON ‘standard’ unleaded and with a 38-litre tank theoretical range is around 975km.

On test, over several hundred kays taking in city, suburban and freeway running, we saw an average of around 4.4L/100km, which is impressive and a big contributor to the car’s appeal.

Using our real-world test number, the range figure comes in at a still handy 860-plus km.

One area where the Mazda did not need fixing is in its fuel economy.

All of the CX-60’s powertrains are rated at Euro 5.

Officially, the G40e 3.3-litre petrol averages 7.4L/100km, on the combined cycle, and emits 174 grams per kilometre of CO2. Urban and Extra Urban numbers are 9.9L/100km and 6.0L/100km.

Fitted with a 58L petrol tank, expect an average range of around 780km. And it will run on standard 91 RON unleaded petrol to boot.

Moving on to the D50e 3.3L diesel, it manages an impressive 5.0L/100km, for a CO2 figure of 132g/km, resulting in a range average of about 1160km. Its Urban/Extra Urban figures are 5.5/4.7L/100km respectively.

And, finally, there’s the P50e 2.5L PHEV, offering a theoretical 2.1L/100km, for a CO2 figure of just 49g/km, for an unlikely range average of 2380km from its 50L tank, though on 95 RON premium unleaded brew.

Out in the real world, and mostly driven harder than a typical owner might, the trip computer in the PHEV showed low sevens, while the diesel displayed mid-eights and the petrol high nines, which aren’t too bad at all.

The first things that come to mind when it comes to driving the Kona Hybrid are comfort, quietness and lack of stress.

From an ergonomic point of view the dash and cabin layout make life easy. There are physical controls for key functions like heating and ventilation, as well as audio and drive modes. Not a fan of the hard driver’s door armrest, though.

The engine is quiet and the transition between combustion and electric power is seamless. It’s fun to watch the (available) graphic screen in the driver’s display illustrating where drive is coming from at any given moment. Without it you’d be hard-pressed to know.

Acceleration is more than adequate and the powertrain’s bias towards electric propulsion means take-offs are ultra-smooth. 

Suspension is by MacPherson-type struts at the front with a multi-link rear set-up and ride quality is outstanding. Despite the Kona Hybrid’s relatively large 18-inch rims, bumps and ruts don’t cause major disruption and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 tyres (215/55) are exceptionally quiet.

Steering accuracy and road feel are both good and drive mode switches between ‘Normal’, ‘Eco’ and ‘Sport’ are noticeable, the latter dialling up urgency and dynamic response.

That said, we found ourselves in Eco most of the time, without any penalty in terms of throttle response or cruising ability.

Torque vectoring helps keep everything buttoned down if you decide to press on through your favourite set of corners, the front seats remain comfy on longer drives while keeping you securely located and the ‘shift-by-wire’ electronic gearshift is slick.

Physical brakes are ventilated discs at the front with solid rotors at the rear and they operate with reassuring smoothness. An active hydraulic booster controls regenerative braking, adjustable through three levels. Warning: the most aggressive setting makes the car annoyingly ‘shunty’ at slower speeds.  

Driver-assist safety tech makes its presence felt occasionally, but never to a disturbing degree… with one exception.

Despite the ability to program a steering wheel button to short-cut directly to the appropriate screen, the need to cancel an incessant and sometimes inaccurate overspeed warning every time you start the car is a pain.

A tidy 10.6m turning circle helps in slow-speed manoeuvres as do front, side and rear parking distance warnings and a high-quality reversing camera.

The Kona Hybrid is as good or better than anything in the class when it comes to the drive experience.

This is the acid test. Does the CX-60 drive like a Mazda should?

In the engine department, definitely.

The changes that Mazda has made to the transmission calibration means that it no longer hunts indecisively between ratios like it used to, and that results in smoother shifts as well as a more relaxed driving experience.

And that's across the range, whether we're talking about the six-cylinder diesel or petrol, or four-pot plug-in hybrid. And the latter brings the biggest surprise, because the changes made to the gearbox have resulted in a much more pleasant car around town, with no more shunting or jerky movements to contend with.

And then there's the ride, which is palpably softer than before. The suspension is significantly more pliable and comfortable as a consequence, offering better bump absorption, improved control at speed and basically just a more refined experience. We tried several of the Lang Lang Proving Ground’s rough-road tests, which the CX-60 sailed over without any of the hard jarring of the previous model, which Mazda helpfully provided for back-to-back assessments.

So, how does all that translate in everyday driving?

Well, the latest CX-60 is way more comfortable to ride in across the board, it handles and corners with greater control and linearity, seems quieter and it's just a suppler experience overall.

As there was so much that was good with the original CX-60 anyway, including muscular performance from the inline six-cylinder turbos, impressive high-speed stability and exceptional body control through fast turns, the modifications for 2025 do much to elevate an already good thing.

So, it's a win-win situation. If you are in the market for a sub-premium, mid-sized SUV with performance and space, as well as newfound comfort and sophistication, you can do a lot worse than check out the CX-60. It is that much better than before.

Thankfully, the CX-60 isn’t frugal on safety, scoring a five-star ANCAP crash-test rating back in 2022.

An extensive suite of driver-assist tech is standard, and it’s all nicely tuned for Australian roads, unlike some Chinese vehicles we’ve tested and that’s an important distinction.

These include autonomous emergency braking (AEB) for cyclists, pedestrians and in back-over situations, blind-spot monitoring, vehicle exit warning, lane-departure, lane-assist and emergency lane-keep tech, driver attention alert, forward obstruction warning, rear cross-traffic alert, turn-across traffic and adaptive cruise control tech with full stop/go.

However, front cross-traffic alert, 'Cruising/Traffic Support' (that assists drivers in slow-moving traffic with automatic accelerator, brake and steering control to maintain a safe distance from the vehicle ahead) and see-through view front camera are not in the Pure. Adaptive LED headlights and drowsy driver alert only start from GT up, while emergency brake assist is for the Azami grade only.

All CX-60s include front and rear parking sensors, surround-view cameras, tyre pressure monitors and traffic sign recognition.

The AEB for vulnerable road users works between 10km/h and 80km/h, and the AEB car-to-car operates between 4km/h and 160km/h.

Likewise, the extensive lane-support systems work between 55km/h and 195km/h.

There are also eight airbags, as well as a trio of child-seat restraining top-tether points fitted, along with two ISOFIX latches in the rear outboard seats.

The Kona is covered by Hyundai’s seven-year/unlimited-km warranty (upgraded from five years mid-last year), which is ahead of the mainstream five-year warranty pack.

Roadside assistance is complimentary for the first year, with the deal extended for another 12 months every time the car is serviced at an authorised Hyundai dealer. 

Speaking of which, scheduled servicing is recommended every 12 months/10,000km, which is a little lower than the (15,000km) norm for the category. After a complimentary check up at six weeks/1500km, the first seven services (in line with Hyundai’s ‘Lifetime Service Plan Pricing’) come in at $3782, for an average of $540 per workshop visit.

That’s on the high side considering an equivalent Toyota Corolla Cross (in line with ‘Toyota Service Advantage’ pricing) will set you back an average of $354 per service over the same period.

Hyundai has a network of 185 dealers covering every Australian capital, state and territory.

Mazda could also do a bit better with its warranty nowadays, since its five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance is decidedly average.

Service intervals are at 12 months or every 15,000km, while a fixed-price service scheme is available, starting from $463 per service depending on powertrain. That’s for the petrol. The diesels start from $500 while the PHEVs commence from $435.