Mercedes-Benz X-Class vs Foton Tunland

What's the difference?

The X was an opportunistic shot at a market segment new to Benz. With even apprentices able to afford to buy a well-specced Hilux, it's become harder to separate the foreman from the kids. I, like Mercedes, thought this would be the boss's car. Mercedes saw the gap and went for it, thinking it could grab sales from top end utes from VW, Toyota and Ford, while maybe saving a few folks from buying a RAM or an F150.

The problem is, the target market knows its utes. And in a rough-and-tumble workplace, the perception is that if you've spent up big on this Merc, you've actually just paid too much for a Nissan Navara. Still, like those flawed movies I enjoy, the X-Class is a fine thing - and I don't blame Mercedes for trying. It just costs too much, and yet isn't Mercedes enough to justify that price.

You have to give Foton some credit because the 2026 Tunland V9-S 4x4 is a big US-sized ute without the big US-style price-tag.

On the surface this is an impressive vehicle. It’s well-equipped, comfortable, reasonably capable off-road and is generally nice to drive.

But under closer scrutiny, and when driving the Tunland, some substantial flaws soon become obvious, not the least of which is an underdone powertrain and some annoying driver-assist tech.

Still, it is a lot of ute for the money, so the Tunland represents a strong case as a budget buy.

Despite being a Japanese ute in drag, the X-Class isn't immediately rumbled as resembling a Nissan, which certainly should count in its favour. Everyone who asked about it had little idea it wasn't a Daimler from the ground up, until you pointed out various details. Up here in the higher reaches, it's a really quality-looking thing, with beautiful paint and enough differentiation to make it look like a Merc. The headlights do seem a tad small next to the rest of the Mercedes range, but the whopping great three-pointed star in the grille leaves no one in doubt. 

It's fairly tasteful in silver, too, and with a few carefully chosen options it looks pretty tough.

Once you're inside you see where it starts to get confused about itself. The hard, scratchy plastic dash pokes out from behind a huge slab of metallic trim. The centre console is clearly a brother from another mother, as is the overall dash layout. The cabin lacks the thoughtfulness and quality of a Mercedes design - you can't just slap on those signature air vents and expect to get away with it. Every piece that comes from Mercedes appears glued on, and it's jarring. 

This might have been less of an issue if the car was significantly cheaper and not likely to be purchased by people who are familiar with the brand.

The Tunland is 5617mm long (with a 3355mm wheelbase), 2090mm wide and 1955mm high. It has a listed kerb weight of 2315kg.

It has a big bluff front end with chrome type front grille, chunky wheel arches, sports bar on the tub, pronounced rear and of course, its not-insubstantial all-around size. These factors give the Tunland presence on and off the road.

But that big front end is not as an in-your-face occasion as the MG U9’s is, not by a long shot.

The interior has everything you’d expect of a top-spec dual-cab interior – synthetic leather seat trim, soft-touch surfaces but also an abundance of durable plastic. And there’s colour ambient lighting front and rear.

Ultimately, the Tunland holds its own in design terms against rival such as the LDV T60 and MG U9.

I really can't imagine how anyone signed off on the most annoying features of the X. Front-seat passengers get a solitary, shallow cupholder (the second one is unusable), and big door bins that could hold a bottle if you didn't mind it getting smashed from sliding around (they're unlined), and nowhere to put your phone. Like, nowhere, except maybe the glove box. Even the centre console bin is shallow and not much good for anything, apart from as an armrest.

The front seats are reasonably comfortable but the rears are way too high (in the name of a better view) and rammed hard against the rear bulkhead. The rear doors are also pretty narrow, so entry and egress can be a bit of a challenge if you're large or toddler small. Once you're in the seats, legroom is limited and headroom marginal. At least you get air-conditioning vents, but you don't get an armrest in the rear. On a nearly $80,000 ute. Even the dark-ages Colorado has one of those.

Anyway, that's enough said about the interior flaws.

The tray is a big boy, but it's worth knowing that the roller cover does rob a bit of space, as it does on any ute. The optional tray liner looks good and with Mercedes-Benz stamped in it, reminds you again what you've got. All told, it's 1581mm long, 1560mm wide (1215mm between the wheelarches) and you can load up nearly a tonne of people and things into the X350. You can also tow a massive 3500kg braked and still be able to carry a payload of 490kg. Gross vehicle mass is 3250kg (tare is 2190kg).

It’s the usual set-up for a ute cabin, which means a workable blend of comfort, ease-of-use, functionality and practicality.

The multimedia system is easy enough to use, but it’s not the most intuitive set-up around with cycling through menus and sub-menus required during operation. But the screen is big and colours are crisp and clearly visible.

There are four USB-A ports, a 220V/300W power socket, a x 12V/120W power outlet as well as two cupholders up front and two in the fold-down armrest in the back row.

The cabin is spacious with the Tunland's extra size used to better accommodate the driver and passengers rather than being used to expand the load space.

Speaking of load space...

In terms of packability for touring, the Tunland’s tub is 1577mm long (1240mm between the wheel arches), 1650mm wide and the load space itself is 530mm deep. Load height is 880mm.

The Tunland’s tub has four tie-down points, but they're positioned too high in the tub for my liking.

All in all, this ute is on a par with its rivals for practicality.

The Tunland V9-S (S for Supreme) is at the top of a four-variant line-up and has recommended pricing starting at $49,990, before on-road costs. The other variants are the V7-C 4x2, V7-C 4x4 and V9-L 4x4. (C - Commercial, L - Luxury.)

Standard features include a 14.6-inch touchscreen multimedia system (with wireless Apple CarPlay plus wireless charging), six-speaker stereo, 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, three-profile facial recognition, dual-zone climate control, six-way powered plus four-way lumbar adjustment heated and ventilated driver seat (with memory function), 18-inch alloy wheels and tailgate assist.

It's worth noting the test vehicle is fitted with a towbar kit (seven-pin, $1384.16 RRP fitted) and RedArc Tow Pro V3 Electric Brake Controller Kit ($871.33 RRP fitted).

Exterior paint choices include standard 'Flare White' (no cost) or you can choose from 'Titanium Grey', 'Phantom Black', 'Lightning Purple', 'Galaxy Silver', 'Fire Red', 'Diamond Blue' or 'Aurora Green', which is on our test vehicle. Each of those colours cost $690 MLP (Manufacturer’s List Price).

While the Tunland bests some of its rivals – such as the MG U9 – for price (the base spec is $52,990, the top grade is $60,990), it can’t match the value proposition of something like the LDV T60 (around $39,000 to $46,500, drive-away), no matter how stacked its features list is.

The X350d has something very Mercedes about it - the engine and transmission package. With 3.5-litres of turbo-diesel V6, you get 190kW at 3400rpm and a thumping 550Nm between 1400 and 3200rpm. These kind of figures at least put it up there with the brawnier VW Amarok.

Feeding the power to all four wheels is Mercedes' own seven-speed automatic. A centre diff apportions power front to rear and you have a choice of three modes - automatic, high range and low-range.

The Tunland has a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel engine – producing 120kW at 3600rpm and 450Nm at 1500-2400rpm – and that’s matched to an eight-speed automatic transmission.

It also has a 48V mild-hybrid system, which is similar to the HiLux’s set-up, cannot be charged manually and does not offer electric-only driving.

This ute also has drive modes – 'Eco', 'Standard', 'Sport', 'Sand' and 'Mud/Snow' – and part-time four-wheel drive.

The engine and auto transmission combination yields a sluggish driving experience on sealed surfaces, and it feels underpowered. The pairing works better in low-speed 4WDing more than anything else.

In terms of engine outputs, the Tunland (120kW/450Nm) lags behind rivals such as the MG U9 (160kW/520Nm) and even the LDV T60 (160kW/500Nm).

The X350d did pretty well in the week I had it - the official figure of 8.8L/100km was never going to happen but with a long motorway run to the Blue Mountains and the rest bashing about town, the 10.5L/100km I did achieve without trying was not bad at all. The 80-litre tank should give you a decent range of 750km, or thereabouts.

Official fuel consumption is listed as 8.0L/100km on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle.

Fuel consumption on this test was 9.8L/100km, which is pretty good because I have done a lot of low-range 4WDing.

The Tunland has a 76-litre fuel tank so, going by that fuel figure, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 775km from a full tank. It also has a 12-litre AdBlue tank.

In fuel consumption terms, the Tunland holds its own against the MG U9 (up to 7.9L/100km official) and LDV T60 (up to 8.1L/100km official).

One of the weirder things to make it into the X-Class is the world's second most irritating column stalk, which is asked to pack in indicators, headlights and wipers. Thankfully, the world's most irritating column stalk, the Mercedes automatic shifter, wasn't inflicted on the X-Class. But the obvious problem is the key, which clearly isn't a Mercedes unit - even the star is ill-fitting and will probably fall off after a while. This is not a premium experience.

Thankfully, the big turbo-diesel wipes away a lot of the complaints about this car not being Mercedes enough. Brawny and super quiet (twin balance shafts will do that), the X is a very easy car to live with. While not especially lively, it's easygoing in the city and very refined.

On the open road it cruises almost silently and the ride is way above what you might expect from an unloaded tradie-mobile. It doesn't feel as high as some utes, which makes it feel a bit more car-like, and will no doubt appeal to some who might have to swap in and out of a traditional SUV and into the X, for whatever reason.

It is by far the most civilised ute I've ever driven and was worlds away from the Colorado I drove last week, to the point where I could almost - almost - see a justification for the unbelievably hefty price tag.

Credit for the refined ride and handling goes to the coil-spring rear end, much maligned in some quarters. While that style of suspension is not the ultimate in load-lugging, it's way more comfortable for passengers and, given the likely buyer profile, probably more agreeable than a cart-sprung rear-end.

I would cheerfully drive long distances in the X and it feels like it could go anywhere.

The Foton Tunland is compliant and comfortable and in general terms, pretty agreeable on road. In fact, ride and handling are quite impressive on sealed surfaces. A large part of the credit for that should be attributed to, a) its size and b) this top-spec model's multi-link suspension. I consists of double wishbones up the front and multi-link at the rear with coil springs, whereas lower-spec Tunlands have leaf springs.

The engine, however, is a different story. “Wheezy, laggy, underpowered,” my notes read.

This ute is underdone in terms of power and torque and though the automatic transmission the engine is paired with is cluey, the combination doesn't have the oomph you'd like in a ute of this size.

The Tunland’s driver-assist tech on road is the wrong side of annoying. It’s either over the top in its preemptive reaction to whatever it thinks is going to happen, or too intrusive or abrasive in its effectiveness. The good news is you can switch that stuff off, but you do have to do that every time you start up.

Now to the off-road.

Crucially, the engine and auto combination works better at low speeds, especially in low-range 4WDing working in partnership with the off-road drive modes – Mud/Snow and Sand – the Tunland does reasonably well.

Low range gearing is good, off-road traction control is reasonably well calibrated, and again, as an overall package it performs satisfactorily. And if you get the urge, you can use diff locks front and rear.

It is, however, somewhat hamstrung by its size – its sheer physical dimensions – and feels low in terms of how much rolling ground clearance it offers, which is listed as listed 240mm but feels like less.

It also has big chunky side steps, so those may well become rock or tree stump magnets when you tackle more challenging technical 4WDing.

For the spec nerds among us, off-road-relevant figures include a 28-degree approach angle, a 26-degree departure angle and a 21-degree rampover angle. Not sure what I’m on about? Check out some of my previous yarns where I painstakingly explain it. By the way, wading depth is a listed 700mm but my tracks weren’t that wet.

Sounds like I’m kicking the Tunland while it’s down? Well, I’m not… much.

Overall, it does reasonably well for what it is. There’s enough power and torque to get you through moderate off-roading obstacles and challenges, but it's not going to win any awards for hardcore grunt.

But this ute – like many contemporary 4WD utes and wagons on the market now – is let down by its standard tyres (Giti 4x4 AT71, 265/70Rx18 116T). If you are planning to do anything more than light to moderate off-roading in this ute one of your first ports of call will be to replace the Tunland’s showroom rubber with a decent set of more aggressive all terrain tyres.

In terms of towing capacity, the Tunland is rated to tow a 750kg unbraked trailer and 3500kg braked.

Payload is 995kg with a Gross Vehicle Mass (GVM) of 3310kg and Gross Combined Mass (GCM) of 6810kg.

For all-around drivability and pure off-road capability, the Tunland manages to hold its own against the likes of the MG U9 and LDV T60. That is to say, satisfactorily.

As of May 2026, the 2026 Tunland has not been rated by ANCAP.

As standard, it has eight airbags and a suite of driver-assist tech including auto emergency braking (AEB), lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alert and a tyre pressure monitoring system.

It also has two child seat anchor points and two ISOFIX anchor points.

In safety terms, the Tunland holds the likes of LDV T60 (unrated), but is eclipsed by the MG U9’s maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating.

Mercedes offers a three year/200,000km warranty for the X, which isn't too bad. It also throws in roadside assist for the duration. Also worthy are the 12 month/20,000km service intervals. 

A basic capped-price service scheme will hit you for $1950 (pre-paid) or $2,555 if you pay when you front up for each of the three services covered. The servicing isn't super-cheap, as you can see, but at least you know what you're up for.

The Tunland is covered by a seven-year/unlimited km warranty and a seven-year roadside assistance plan.

The first service – at three months or 5000km – is free, but after that service intervals are scheduled for every 12 months or 15,000km and end up totalling an estimated $4492.39 (over seven years). Those service costs are getting up there.

Foton Australia has about 30 dealerships across the country.

In terms of the warranty period, the Tunland bests the LDV T60 (seven-year/200,000km new vehicle warranty) and the MG U9’s five-year/unlimited-kilometre manufacturer warranty, but the is closer in terms of overall costs with the MG U9 costing $2395 in total for the first five years (up to 70,000km), and the LDV T60 costing between $300 to more than $750 each service.