Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Ford Puma

What's the difference?

EV buyers who don’t or won’t see the point of the Mustang Mach-E are missing out.

This is a sporty and fun-to-drive electric SUV in the same way that the Ranger is the sporty and fun-to-drive ute. In other words, a lot of what makes Fords brilliant is alive and well here, without compromising functionality. The opposite of so many Chinese electric SUVs that shine brightest on the showroom floor, then.

Yes, a base Select that is around $10K cheaper to start with might help punters see the light even more clearly (and that's our choice), and it is starting to look dated inside and out, but overall, the Mach-E is an enjoyable, fulfilling and practical family proposition.

If a minimum price and maximum interior space are your priorities, then the Puma is not for you. Especially so in the flagship ST-Line V, which may seem too small and a tad cramped compared to, say, a Seltos, C-HR or ASX.

Where the Ford excels, typically, is in the way it encourages the keen driver while cosseting four occupants (and a surprising amount of their cargo). There's a poise and maturity to the way the Puma moves that puts it on a par with or even beyond some premium compact SUVs. Even the styling is a statement. If the badges (and dashboard) were covered, you might be convinced this cat is actually a Jag.

If all that is more important, then the ST-Line V is for you. The very antithesis, then, of the unassuming and unloved EcoSport the Puma usurps.

So, what's changed with the facelift? Not much, meaning that the Mach-E – unveiled all the way back in late 2019 is beginning to look dated. Maybe that’s another classic Mustang trait.

The base Select gains the upper-series’ trick LED headlights. The Premium adopts some plastic body cladding. The grille treatments vary between the grades, with the GT boasting a unique look. Genuinely fresh new colours abound. And the alloys have been restyled.

Otherwise, it's still the same, Porsche Macan-esque small to medium-sized SUV crossover on the outside, down to the Hyundai Tucson-like vertical tail-light motif that barely seems like the regular Mustang muscle car’s, despite Ford’s intentions.

Inside, changes are largely limited to a repositioning of the gear selector from a rotary dial to a column shifter, Mercedes-style. That big portrait touchscreen could be straight out of a Ranger ute.

If you search for the 1998 Puma coupe, you'll see some vague similarities with its modern SUV namesake, especially in their anthropomorphic face. It's in the eyes. There are also hints of Aston Martin (DBX), Porsche (Macan) and – let's face it – Mazda (CX-3).

Yet the real achievement lies in the way Ford has managed to make a 4.2-metre-long by 1.8m wide by 1.6m high crossover look so svelte, with the resulting balanced proportions, flowing lines and taut surfacing giving the Puma quite an athletic visual presence. After the EcoSport failure, head-turning looks were deemed paramount.

The extra girth gained by widening the Fiesta's platform allowed Ford's designers to create a muscular body that could also accommodate a metre-wide tailgate opening, while beneath the cargo floor is an exceptionally deep storage box, bringing better-than-expected practicality to boot.

As we’ve said before, the Mach-E is closer to something like, say, a BMW X4 than the boxier X3 from a proportions perspective, making it a classic coupe SUV.

Once you get over using the endlessly-annoying push-button door release, in lieu of a handle (why redesign the wheel?), that’s particularly noticeable entering/egressing the rear seat for larger people, though the front is fine.

While the interior is also clearly from an earlier era (and embarrassingly reminiscent of a Tesla), at least Ford finished engineering it for easy, seamless use.

The front seats are really comfy, ahead of a super-clear instrument pod, helping make for a great driving position, while the 15.5-inch display in the centre with Ford’s friendly SYNC4A operating system is simple to navigate once time is taken to familiarise. Current Ranger and Everest owners will feel right at home. The audio sound is superb too.

There’s a thoughtful amount of storage options, including for devices that require access to the handy USB outlets, ventilation is ample and the fit and finish in these Mexican-made Mustangs appears to be first class.

A big thumbs up, too, for the new column shifter and integrated central volume knob in the touchscreen that also allows adjustment of the climate control.

On the other hand, eyes must leave the road to dig into sub menus to change driving modes, side and rear vision is tight (those standard surround-view cameras sure come in handy), there are no paddle shifters to control regenerative braking, the glass roof neither opens nor completely blocks out sunlight due to there being no shade screen, and the overall ambience is more Ranger XLT than Ford LTD.

The back seat is surprisingly spacious given the coupe SUV dimensions, though the roofline may ruffle a few loose wigs. The backrests and cushions provides decent support, and most expected amenities are present, including air vents, USB outlets, overhead lighting/grab handles, coat hooks, cup/small bottle holders and centre armrest. And that glass ceiling does shower the cabin with light on a cloudy day.

Further back, the Mach-E offers 402 litres of cargo capacity that balloons out to 1420L with the split-fold back seats dropped, and there’s some hidden storage under the floor for smaller items. As mentioned earlier, the spare wheel is AWOL.

Existing owners will also notice a noticeably smaller ‘frunk’ area under the bonnet, where storage has plummeted from 134L to just 49L. That’s due to the newly-fitted heat pump that, at least helps boost efficiency in what is a spacious and practical family SUV.

Compact yet spacious, the ST-Line V's interior has strong as well as weak points.

Let's start with the latter. The most obvious connection with the Fiesta is in the Puma's dashboard, which is largely shared between the two. After all the effort expended on the design and chassis, this is somewhat disappointing. There's nothing wrong essentially with the fascia's aesthetics or functionality – it's just that the look is humdrum and dated. What's needed is something with the visual wow factor as found in the latest Peugeot 2008, especially at this price point.

Yet Ford has at least tried to put some tinsel inside this most expensive version of its smallest SUV.

Stitched perforated leather seat facings, carbon-fibre-look trim and soft vinyl coverings in key touchpoint areas bring an upmarket look and feel, backed up by a now-familiar digital instrumentation layout, a lovely flat-bottomed three-spoke steering wheel, easy and intuitive multimedia interface and a wireless phone charger. That electronic cluster, by the way, changes colour and markings but doesn't have the scope of multimedia displays of, say, Audi's Virtual Cockpit. It's comparatively rudimentary.

Conversely, there's a solidity and quietness as well, offering a level of refinement that's usually found in more-premium Euro alternatives. We weren't expecting that, though of course this is a German Ford product.

Our test car also boasted a vast glass opening sunroof, adding to the opulence. With all this gear, the ST-Line V's cabin is properly appealing.

On the practicality front, entry and egress is pretty good, the driving position is excellent (thanks in no small part to a big amount of adjustability for both the steering column and seats), the front cushions themselves are sumptuously enveloping, while wide door pockets and a big glovebox obviously come in useful. And there's a USB-C outlet in the centre cubby between the seats. How modern.

However, rear vision out is poor, there are no seat warmers and some of the lower-lying plastics are a bit drab.

The back seat isn't really suitable for people over 175cm, as kneeroom is limited and taller scalps may scrape the ceiling with the twin-pane sunroof in situ. The latter also means no overhead grab handles.

But the backrest angle and cushions themselves are fine, even for longer journeys. Just don't expect to squeeze a third adult in the back unless rubbing shoulders won't bug you. Note, too, that the rear cushion does not slide or tilt forward to allow for a lower load area when the backrest is folded down. Pity.

There is a receptacle in both doors for small bottles but no cupholders whatsoever (how can Ford call itself an American company?), or face-level air vents – though the large dash vent outputs do reach the rear. Amenities such as USBs and cupholders are AWOL; and vision out from back there is limited by the high shoulder line. Tough if you're trying to peer out. Sorry, Fido.

The Puma's overall compact footprint and rear packaging clearly suggest that this is aimed at singles, couples, or couples with smaller kids/pets to transport around.

Still, for a small SUV, the cargo area isn't bad at all. The standard floor depth is fairly generous, with a long and flat loading area, but below that is a narrower yet deeper waterproof area, while under that again is a space-saver spare wheel. Clever. Also intelligent is the luggage cover that lifts automatically with the tailgate, as per Mazda's CX-5.

For the record, cargo capacity is rated at 410 litres with the 60/40 split-fold rear seats erect – or 1170L with them folded down flat. These figures far outstrip the CX-3.

To sum the cabin experience… it's far-better than its Fiesta-sourced dashboard may suggest, while the ST-Line V treatment goes a long way in helping justify the premium. That's a win.

In Australia, the Puma plays in the burgeoning 'Light SUV' segment, so goes up against the ageing yet athletic Mazda CX-3 as well as Honda's HR-V, along with more recent challengers like the Hyundai Venue, Kia Stonic, Nissan Juke II, Toyota Yaris Cross and Volkswagen T-Cross. All are ready to pounce on the bestselling Hiroshima crossover.

What every one of these baby SUVs have in common is that they're based on B-segment – or supermini – platforms. However, prices and sizes do blur in this corner of the class, with larger small-car-derived rivals from the 'Small SUV' segment above, led by the Mitsubishi ASX, Kia Seltos, Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona, also in the Ford's crosshairs.

Formidable opponents indeed, and just like that, the first big hurdle appears for the Blue Oval hopeful. Puma is Light SUV-sized but Small SUV-priced, with the entry-level grade kicking off from a tenner under $30,000, and before on-road costs. That's even more expensive than the VW.

This instantly eliminates it from many buyers' radars.

In contrast, a CX-3 Neo Sport starts from just $22,890. But that's with a manual gearbox, plain interior and steel wheels, whereas the Puma includes a ripper turbo engine/auto combo, climate control, a smartphone app that allows for remote vehicle location/ locking/unlocking/starting, voice-activated sat nav, wireless smartphone charging, lane-departure warning and assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver impairment monitor, 17-inch alloys and a leather steering wheel.

Along with other goodies like AEB with pedestrian alert, reverse camera, Bluetooth audio and telephony, Apple CarPlay/Android auto, digital radio, live traffic updates, fuel-saving engine stop/start, auto headlights, rain-sensing wipers, adaptive cornering fog lights, powered folding mirrors, push-button start and puddle lamps, the Puma looks and feels up-spec inside. To match most of that stuff in the CX-3 you'll need a Maxx Sport auto from $26,890.

Rising to the $32,340 ST-Line drops the Puma's ride height by just 2mm (to 164mm), but adds firmer suspension, a body kit, glitzier alloys, sports seats, a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, flat-bottomed steering wheel, paddle shifters and racier trim for a racier experience, though it loses the climate control for a manual air-con set-up. Strange. This grade might just be the sweet spot in the Ford's range, though it does sit about $1300 higher than the CX-3 sTouring equivalent.

Finally, the subject of this test, the ST-Line V, scores privacy glass, lashings of chrome, keyless entry/start, leather upholstery, climate control, premium audio, a powered tailgate and 18-inch alloys. All for $35,540, it's about on a par with CX-3 Akari, but lacks the latter's powered driver's seat and heated front cushions, among other items. The Mazda also goes one better with a $2000 AWD option from all mid-level grades up, as well as manual availability.

We recommend the $1500 Park Package, which ushers in adaptive cruise control with full stop/go and lane-centring tech, as well as blind-spot detection and auto parking. Premium paint adds $650, a panoramic roof $2000, roof rails $250 and a black roof $500.

Against compelling alternatives costing less, like the high-flying Seltos Sport+, CX-30 G20 Touring and Toyota C-HR Koba, the ST-Line V struggles to make sense on paper. Can the Puma's cabin and driving experience claw back its obvious price disadvantage?

Though employing Ford’s Global Electrified One (GE1) platform that is a variation of the tragically discontinued Focus small car and Escape mid-sized SUV’s modular C2 platform, the Mach-E is basically a rear-motor, rear-wheel-drive EV, with the main traction unit now an in-house design. Previously that was outsourced.

A permanent magnet synchronous electric motor, it delivers 212kW of power and 525Nm of torque to the rear wheels via a single-speed reduction gear transmission.

Tipping the scales at 2086kg in the (albeit bigger-battery) Premium and 2100kg in the Select, its power-to-weight ratio is nearly 102kW per tonne and 101kW/tonne respectively. The latter needs 6.2s to streak from 0-100km/h, which is just 0.1s shy of the former. Top speed for both is 180km/h.

Meanwhile, with an electric motor added on to the front axle, the 2276kg, 434kW/955Nm GT’s 190kW/tonne slices acceleration down to just 3.8s, on the way to 200km/h, and relies on AWD, adaptive dampers and performance tyres to help keep things under control. Suspension consists of MacPherson struts up front and a multi-link rear end arrangement.

A multiple international engine-of-the-year winner, the compact and lightweight, 999cc 1.0-litre twin-cam three-cylinder turbo petrol unit is the sole choice for now. Driving the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT), it delivers 92kW of power and 170Nm of torque.

With no all-wheel drive option, there are instead five driving modes – Normal, Sport, Slippery (for snow) and Trail (gravel) applications, working on the traction, stability and transmission algorithms to mimic some of the benefits of AWD. In the ST-Line V, a set of paddle shifters are fitted in lieu of the sadly-absent manual gearbox.

Owners of the previous-shape Fiesta S and EcoSport would be familiar with the 1.0T's smooth and strident performance, though these 2010s models used a completely different type of DCT. This was the highly-publicised Powershift, which consisted of a dry-clutch system, and was prone to a multitude of problems and failures in the petrol-powered auto versions.

In contrast, the Puma adopts a next-generation transmission dubbed 7DCT300; related to the item found in some smaller Mercedes-Benz, Renault and Nissan models, it instead employs a more-robust wet-clutch system with a higher torque threshold, so promises to be far more durable and reliable than the problematic old dry-clutch unit.

Ford says the Select averages 18.5kWh/100km on the European cycle, while the Premium and GT are at 17.7kWh/100km and 21.0kWh/100km, respectively. These figures are in line with most rivals given the Mach-E’s performance capabilities.

Two distinct battery packs are offered, depending on grade.

The Select features a (useable) 73kWh Lithium Ferro phosphate (LFP) battery, for 470km of WLTP driving range. Premium and GT models switch to an 88kWh and 91kWh Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) unit, bumping range up to 600km and 515km respectively.

The GE1’s 400V architecture has a CCS Type 2 port with 11kW AC charging capacity, or 150kW for DC charging. Many rivals offer faster charging capabilities.

According to the European data, AC charging from empty to full using a regular household socket needs up to 47 hours, or 10 hours with a 7kW Wallbox, while, a 50kW DC charger requires up to 90 minutes for a 10-80 per cent top-up, or under 40 minutes with a 150kW DC charger.

The Puma's official combined average fuel consumption figure is just 5.3 litres per 100km, which works out to 121 grams per kilometre. Fitted with a 42-litre fuel tank, the potential range averages out to almost 800km between refills.

Out in the real world, we managed an exceptional 6.2L/100km, no doubt helped by an ever-eager stop/start system (which, annoyingly, kills the air-con when it extinguishes the engine; we found ourselves constantly pressing that 'off' button as the days wore on). This figure was achieved in motorway-heavy driving scenarios, albeit loaded with holiday gear and with the air-con blaring.

So, we took another, urban-focused test, in lots of slow-moving traffic situations, and averaged a still-solid 8.0L/100km.

Note, that while the Puma requires 95 RON premium unleaded, it's also perfectly happy on – and is even recommended by Ford for – the cheapest petrol currently offered in Australia, 94 RON E10 unleaded. Either way, the ST-Line V is a frugal small SUV.

If your idea of a Mustang is a big, heavy and rousing grand touring machine, then the Mach-E certainly lives up to the image.

And, in some ways, exceeds it, because – among the electric SUV fraternity – this one’s the driver’s choice, with a level of control and finesse that the muscle machines of yesteryear could only dream about.

Let's start with the performance. The 212kW Select and Premium are certainly fast enough. Sprightly off the mark, their acceleration is very smooth yet very determined, packing plenty of instantaneous punch when some extra squirt is required. Really, this is all the speed you’ll ever need.

Ford’s dynamic DNA force is very strong in these EVs, with steering that feels light yet precise, and naturally connected to the road, providing comparatively agile, flowing handling and decent body control. This is backed up by nicely nuanced traction intervention that – in true rear-drive Pony car tradition – allows for some playful rear-end breakaway.

After years of testing dreary, remote EVs – especially from but not just limited to China, the Mach-E’s willingness to interact with the driver is like enjoying a long, cold drink after hours in the hot sun.

With twin electric motors making 434kW and nearly 1000Nm, the GT turns the amp – if not quite the volume – up to 11, with tremendous response and terrific thrust right from the get-go. It’s actually quite astounding how contained and controlled the AWD flagship’s performance is delivered, given how brazenly fast it is down a straight road.

Jumping out of one of the other Mach-E models, the GT’s extra heft is immediately obvious around the bends, since it doesn’t quite have their lightness of touch. Grip is phenomenal, yet the driver can break traction even momentarily if desired, and there’s a sense that, in the right hands, few rivals with similar performance could keep up with the Ford in full flight. It’s fast everywhere all the time. But it’s just not quite as athletic or fun as the Select and Premium.

Note that, since we were on busy public roads, most of this assessment was carried out using the normal and not sport driving mode.

The driver assist safety systems are also really well tuned, sparing the driver the distraction and frustration of needless intervention, even when piloted enthusiastically.

The previous Mach-E was widely criticised for delivering a hard ride, even with the GT’s adaptive dampers. While you’d never call the suspension supple, the 2026 model’s ability to better absorb bumps is a welcome development, allowing the driver to better enjoy all the other benefits on offer. There are softer and more isolated alternatives, but few rivals are as rewarding dynamically.

Downsides include too much road noise intrusion over certain surfaces, the lack of paddles for the regenerative braking, and the fact that to switch that on or off requires the driver to resort to diving into a touchscreen menu. The same goes for switching between the cringy Whisper (eco), Active (normal) and Untame (sport) modes. How difficult would it be to fit a simple button to activate these?

Finally, thick pillars and small side/rear windows can make vision out difficult in tight spaces.

The Mach-E may be getting on to its sixth year in production, but there’s a welcome, non-EV analogue connection to the way this otherwise electrifying SUV goes, steers, handles and grips the road. Like many of the best Fords, the engineers have gone to the very real effort of prioritising driver enjoyment, without sacrificing everyday functionality.

Like we said earlier, the more time you spend in the Mach-E, the more enjoyable it gets.

If the Puma's pricing is complicated, its cabin surprising accommodating and its real-world efficiency particularly parsimonious, then the upward trajectory of pros over cons continues with performance that's downright spirited.

Around town first. A small-displacement engine plus a turbo plus a DCT usually spell interminable spells of lag when all the driver longs for is an instant and measured response to a right foot flexing down onto the throttle.

But the Ford largely sidesteps such pitfalls. Though momentarily hesitant at take-off, the three-pot turbo does then get down to business in no time, with a sustained and satisfying surge of thrust as the revs grow, accompanied by a lusty and raspy thrum that's entirely in keeping with the Puma's track-pants appearance. And it doesn't let up either, with speed building up strongly through the gears, and much more so than the mere 999ccs suggest. Great for overtaking, or taking over a rapidly diminishing gap in the peak-hour derby.

Selecting Sport (a fiddly action that's located too far from the driver for safe eyes-on-the-road operation) lights an even bigger fire in the Puma's belly, with punchier acceleration and a very attentive transmission tune, slicing seamlessly through the seven ratios, leaving you in awe that a heart so small can possess such deep lungs.

Where the Ford really leaves an indelible mark is its enthusiasm to corner just as keenly, armed with brilliantly slick steering and a planted chassis that is set up to both encourage and interact with the driver. Minimal body roll and lots of grip from a quality quartet of Continental tyres ensure the Puma can be punted about like a sporty little hatchback, while the electronic safety tech allowing just enough leeway for lots of fun before they gently reel everything back into line.

We cannot think of a more enjoyable small SUV. And, by the way, those same driver-assist systems provide exceptionally nuanced lane-keep and adaptive cruise-control intervention – certainly they're right up there with the premium SUV brigade.

Given that our Puma wore 215/50R18 rubber, on a 'sports' suspension tune, the ride around town is commendable, with ample cushioning from the rough stuff. There is some tautness to the ride, but it isn't hard or rough; the ST-Line V walks a fine line between urban-agility and surface-decay isolation. In other words, it's commendably relaxing to travel in.

At higher speeds, some road and tyre noises do permeate through inside, and those Dumbo door mirrors do create some wind whoosh, but overall, given how dynamic the chassis is, the Puma feels grown up and sophisticated.

Tested under the 2019 Euro NCAP crash-test regime, the Puma scores a top five-star ANCAP rating.

However, this means it does not meet the more stringent frontal offset crash, side impact crash and far-side impact crash-test criteria introduced by ANCAP for 2020 model-year vehicles – despite launching in September of that year.

Safety items include dual front, front-seat side and side curtain airbags (six in total), AEB with pedestrian and cyclist detection (working between 7km/h and 80km/h), lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver fatigue alert, rear parking sensors, tyre pressure monitors and emergency assistance. These come on top of anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist, stability control and traction control.

As mentioned earlier, adaptive cruise control, active park assistance, front parking sensors and blind-spot detection are part of the $1500 'Park Package'. Do it.

A five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the Mach-E, along with seven years of roadside assistance, activated annually if serviced at a Ford dealer.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first.

Prices for the 2026 facelift weren’t available at the time of publishing, but last year’s model alternated between costing $140 and $185 per service for the first 10 years. And the Mach-E can be maintained at any one of the 180-or-so Ford dealers network Australia-wide.

Ford says the EV Traction Battery is covered by an eight-year/160,000km warranty.

Ford offers the industry-average warranty of five-years/unlimited kilometres. Services intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km.

There is also a capped-price servicing scheme under the 'Ford Service Benefits' banner, with the first four years/60,000km of 'A and B' logbook services pegged at $299 per visit, and then between $320 and $560, for up to 12 years.

There is also a Ford loan car program, SYNC 3 map updates and Motoring Club Membership included during that time frame.