Cupra Tavascan vs Gac Aion Ut

What's the difference?

Like most Cupras, the Tavascan is affordable, stylish, practical, fun to drive and just that little bit different.

And it is clear the Volkswagen Group is trying hard to make the brand a success. That it can bring that formula to the medium EV SUV market with as much aplomb might just be enough to lure more than a few would-be Model Y buyers Barcelona’s way.

Definitely one to strongly consider.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The Aion UT is a cleverly-specified little hatchback and a great entry-point into electric motoring. The software needs a bit of work from a usability perspective, plus the spongy ride and cutesy styling might not be for everyone. 

However, with strong points including driving range, cabin space and value, there’s even a pitch for it in some cases to be an only car compared to most of its price rivals, which are more likely to be thought of as a second car runabout in a two-car garage.

The pick of the range is definitely the entry-level Premium. It comes in at a headline-grabbing price with specs to blow rivals out of the water, while only missing out on a few luxuries.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

Although this mid-sized SUV is full of German VW Group DNA underneath, there are unique Cupra styling elements that do strive to evoke Spanish expression.

Designed in Barcelona, standout points include an insectoid trio of LEDs making up the headlights and tail-lights, an aggressive nose featuring a V-shaped bonnet bulge and lower-bumper treatment, a rising swage line in profile and pronounced rear diffuser.

While we appreciate the Tavascan’s styling flourishes, with the Manga-esque vent ‘eyes’, copper trim and floating wing-look upper dash-pad all gelling together nicely, the unique central spine design looks downmarket if not cheap, with an alien look and sheeny reptilian scale finish. There are too many things going on at once.

Built on the VW Group’s MEB EV architecture, the Cupra shares its platform with the VW ID.4, Skoda Enyaq and Audi Q4 e-tron SUVs within the VW Group, providing a sound engineering base, but also a tall, narrow appearance when seen rear-on.

Maybe that’s why the Tavascan achieves such an impressive drag coefficiency of 0.26.

Dimensions are 4644mm (length), 1861mm (width), 1597mm (height) and 2766mm (wheelbase), while ground clearance is a low 154mm.

For a so-called “Coupe Utility Vehicle” (CUV), all translate to quite acceptable interior space and practicality.

GAC tells us the UT hatch was designed in Milan, Italy, but it also isn’t ashamed of the Chinese influence on its overall appearance, like the ultra-short bonnet and Chinese city-car style face.

Along the side it has a modern, aerodynamic profile, and the ultra-short overhangs and long wheelbase maximise the amount of room for batteries under the floor and interior space.

The rear feels a lot like a modern Mini, with its bulbous tailgate and protruding light clusters, spiced up with a sporty spoiler piece jutting out.

It’s not a bad looking thing and it’s available in an array of fun colours.

On the inside it seems to follow the established rule-book of Chinese automakers, with plush trims, big screens with minimal physical buttons as well as a contemporary two-spoke steering wheel.

There’s a trendy floating console which hosts the cupholders and wireless charger on the Luxury grade, and an array of interesting patterns and textures through the doors and dash which you wouldn’t have once seen on a car at this price-point.

However, it is worth noting that while the seats are quite nice, and the steering wheel is a stand-out touchpoint, the trims on the doors and across the dash-top are hard plastics, more so than some of this car’s rivals.

Now, with all that CUV stuff in mind, the Tavascan manages to look and feel sporty whilst also offering a decent level of family friendly functionality.

Wide doors and a high hip point offer easy entry and egress, in a roomy and accommodating cabin, on seats that are brilliantly comfy and supportive – even in the base Endurance. These are of the integrated ‘tombstone’ variety with bolstered sides to help keep you snug and secure. They’re great.

So is the driving position, with its grippy little wheel, readily accessible switchgear (including the knobs on the spokes), clear view of the modestly sized digital instrumentation pod and angled touchscreen.

After all the criticism that the VW Group’s earlier iterations of this system had garnered – including in other Cupras – the Tavascan’s interface proved to be simple to navigate, fast to respond and pleasant to look at.

Furthermore, even with that rising window line, vision out is AOK and ventilation is fine, too.

The aforementioned central spine’s shape appears to come at the expense of storage, as there’s less of it than expected in an EV SUV. The small glovebox is disappointing. We’re not fans of the driver’s door power window switch bank, necessitating a distracting press of a ‘rear’ button to operate the back windows. And one of the test cars suffered from dash squeaks.

Moving on to the rear, with seating for five, there’s actually ample space for people up to about 180cm tall, while all the usual amenities apply, such as vent outlets, a pair of USB-C ports, a folding armrest with cup holders and overhead lighting. Nothing seems to be missing.

However, there is one important thing missing further back.

Yes, the Tavascan’s boot offers a handy 540 litres of cargo capacity, with a low, wide and flat floor capable of swallowing all sorts of stuff. And, of course, the 60/40 rear backrest fold down, boosting those numbers to between 1579L and 1604L depending on specification.

But, as with almost all EVs, there is no spare wheel. The aforementioned tyre mobility kit is bad news if you experience a severe puncture. Even a space-saver spare would be infinitely preferable.

In terms of interior space, the Aion UT stands out with its spacious cabin. At 182cm tall, I am easily able to find a comfortable seating position, and visibility out the front sides and rear, while not as good as some small SUVs, isn’t bad.

There’s lots of headroom, and while I mentioned the hard plastic door cards before, there’s enough padding everywhere your elbows are going to touch to make it feel a bit nicer than perhaps it is.

The main drawback of this car for me is the lack of tactile buttons and the frustrating software.

The main screen isn’t particularly well utilised, being taken up by either a background or the navigation map, with an array of typically small shortcuts across the bottom for important features like the climate control or settings menus.

You can pre-set a few information panels which sit above the shortcut bar as in many rival cars and there’s also a shortcut tray which can be hosted on the driver’s side and configured with a variety of shortcuts and settings.

It’s just a bit clumsy to use, and the array of poorly-labelled settings menus for things like active safety equipment feel needlessly complicated.

I’d love to see this car with physical controls for climate and multimedia to make it easier to live with.

Up front the storage is decent. There are big pockets in the doors and a large storage tray between the driver and front passenger thanks to a flat floor. There’s also a slightly weird storage box under the touchscreen which has a net inside, good for more delicate objects you don’t want flying around the cabin.

On the floating console there are two cupholders which are a bit too shallow for my liking, and the wireless charger feels almost pointless because its made of a hard plastic, so your phone just slides right off in the corners. The cabled outlets are hidden beneath which allows for tidy cable management and the centre armrest console box is a healthy size.

The rear seat is comparatively basic, although touches on the key points. Its main advantage is how generous the space is. My frame was able to fit behind my own driving position with heaps of room for my knees, and just enough room for my head despite the dip in the roof for the sunroof shade in the Luxury-grade car we tested. There may be even more headroom in the base car.

The flat floor makes the space useful even for three across in a pinch and there’s a drop-down armrest with (again, shallow) cupholders. There are pockets on the back of both front seats and smallish pockets in each door. The array of soft trims continues, too, and the back of the centre console features a partially adjustable air vent. Luxury spec cars get a single USB rear power outlet.

As with many Chinese cars in this segment, the generous rear seat space comes at a cost to the boot. It measures just 321 litres, which is slightly smaller than its main opponents in this category, although larger than some hatchbacks like the Toyota Corolla, for example.

It has its advantages, though. The floor is two-tiered, and can offer a flat load area with the rear seats folded down, or a deeper boot in its lower position. Underneath there’s a cutaway good for charging equipment and the tyre repair kit (sorry, no spare wheel in here).

Unlike some EVs, the Aion UT doesn’t get a frunk (front boot) for additional storage.

The GAC Aion UT starts from $31,990, before on-road costs, for the entry-level Premium grade, which makes it the third-most affordable EV you can buy in Australia after the city-sized BYD Atto 1 and the entry-level version of the BYD Dolphin.

It sits closer to price-parity with the GWM Ora, but is significantly more affordable than the rear-drive MG4 and more spec-competitive top-grade BYD Dolphin.

The bigger threat to the Aion UT is that a lot of buyers will be willing to spend slightly more to get into one of the most affordable electric small SUVs, like the BYD Atto 2 or Jaecoo J5.

Still, GAC makes a solid pitch for its hatch, which offers a higher spec level than its most direct price rivals.

For example, the Aion UT is more powerful than the entry-level Dolphin and Ora while offering a higher level of interior equipment. 

Even the just-arrived front-drive MG4 Urban also starts at $31,990, but that’s for a version with significantly less driving range.

In fact, I’d go so far as to say the entry-level version of the Aion UT (the confusingly-named Premium) is probably the pick of the two variant range.

Standard equipment levels on this car include 17-inch alloy wheels, LED lighting all around, synthetic leather interior trim with heated and power adjust front seats, a 14.6-inch multimedia touchscreen with online connectivity and built-in nav as well as wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

There’s also an 8.88-inch digital instrument cluster, heated steering wheel and the full array of safety kit.

With the same power and battery size, this leaves only arguably unnecessary luxuries for the Luxury grade, like a wireless phone charger, ventilated driver’s seat, auto dimming rear vision mirror with auto power folding wing mirrors, a powered tailgate and of course, a panoramic sunroof (with shade!).

Don’t go searching for more boot space under the bonnet – there isn’t any.

Plus, the main electric motor – a permanently excited synchronous unit – is located on the rear axle, driving the rear wheels via a single-speed transmission.

Tipping the scales at 2238kg, the Endurance makes 210kW of power, to offer a power-to-weight ratio of 94kW per tonne, as well as a 0-100km/h sprint time of 6.8 seconds, on the way to a top speed of 180km/h.

Meanwhile, the VZ also has a smaller, asynchronous 80kW/134Nm electric motor over the front axle, channelling up to 30 per cent of the SUV’s total power to the front wheels as traction requires, and upping the combined power maximum to 250kW. Tipping the scales at 2284kg, the VZ offers 109kW/tonne, while the 0-100km/h time slips to 5.5s. Both offer a 545Nm torque maximum.

The 400-volt MEB platform consists of MacPherson-style struts up front and a multi-link rear end. The VZ adds adaptive dampers. Braked towing capacity is 1000kg in Endurance and 1200kg in the VZ.

The Aion UT has a front-mounted electric motor producing 150kW/210Nm. That’s plenty punchy for any hatchback at this price, and I like the way the brand hasn’t messed around with a sub-100kW motor in the base variant to push prospects towards the top-spec car.

It’s more powerful than all of its closest rivals and at the time of writing you’ll have to spend four to six thousand dollars more to get into something equivalent from BYD, Chery, Jaecoo, Leapmotor or MG.

It even has a claimed 0-100km/h sprint time as low as 7.3 seconds.

The Tavascan employs an 82kWh Lithium-ion battery pack, offering a useable capacity of 77kWh.

Mounted down low in the structure to provide extra rigidity as well as balance, it helps the Cupra achieve a near-ideal 49/51 front/rear weight distribution.

The battery is also separated in 12 removable modules for easier repair and parts replacement.

When the accelerator is lifted or in ‘B’ mode, the electric motor acts as a generator to feed energy back into the battery. Three levels of brake energy recuperation is also available via the steering wheel’s paddle-shifters.

Cupra says that the Endurance RWD offers a WLTP range of 540km, while the circa-60kg heavier VZ AWD drops that to 499km, or 463km with the Extreme Package’s grippy high-performance tyres.

Officially, the combined average energy consumption figures are between 15.2 and 16.0kWh/100km in Endurance and between 16.5 and 16.8kWh/100km in the VZ.

Driving around Adelaide and beyond in the beautiful wine country, we managed between 15.0 and 22kWh/100km, as indicated on the Tavascan’s trip computer, which isn’t too bad.

The Cupra features an AC charging capacity of 11kW and DC charging capacity of 135kW.

Charging from empty to full when plugged in at home or work can take nearly 40 hours, or about 12.5hr with an optional 7.4kW wallbox, while a 10-80 per cent top-up using a standard 50kW fast charger needs about 75 minutes, or under half an hour if you find a super-fast 150kW outlet.

The Aion UT has a 60kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery pack, which grants it a WLTP-certified 430km of driving range.

That’s more than its closest rivals, like the entry-level Ora Standard Range (310km), BYD Dolphin Essential (410km) or BYD Atto 2 (345km).

Claimed efficiency is 16.4kWh/100km and the car I tested returned a consumption of 14.0kWh/100km over a 130km route of mixed conditions, which isn’t bad at all.

Charging speeds are less impressive, but realistically appropriate for the relatively small battery. The peak DC charging capacity of 87kW means a charge time which the brand quotes at 24 minutes, but this is from 30-80 per cent. Expect closer to 40 minutes for a 10-80 per cent charge.

AC charging is decent, at 11kW. This should have you charging from 10-80 per cent between four and five hours.

Cupra prides itself as a builder of sporty, stylish and offbeat vehicles, and insists that the Tavascan is no exception.

With its design, interior presentation and powertrain supporting such expectations, the acid test is now how the Tavascan performs out on the road.

The really encouraging news is that, on our launch drive experience at least, Cupra’s coupe SUV serves up sportiness and a whole lot more besides.

Let’s start with performance.

Aided by a fine driving position, the Tavascan almost goes out of its way to normalise the EV operating experience, with the now-familiar VW Group column-mounted gear selector being reassuringly straight forward. You’re not left wondering if this thing is even on.

Choose the default Comfort drive setting, and the Cupra whooshes forward with eager yet measured forcefulness, so you’re spared unpleasant jerkiness. Speed builds up quickly and smoothly as the road opens up ahead. So far, so good.

Need extra muscle for overtaking or joining freeway traffic? There’s ample in reserve, revealing the real-world pace and response that even the least-expensive Tavascan offers. The Endurance is a deceptively brisk machine for the money. And that’s before the sportier driving modes are engaged.

Speaking of which, the steering is simply superb, offering sharp yet progressive cornering capabilities. You feel connected to the car, and that translates into very predictable handling and reassuring roadholding. Cupra is starting to shape up as one of our favourite non-German German-owned brands.

But the biggest shock is the Tavascan’s ride quality.

Now, though wearing 19-inch wheels and on steel springs, Cupra’s sporty leanings meant we expected the base grade to ride with tolerable firmness at best.

Instead, over Adelaide’s suburban streets leading into the hills (and then beyond), the suspension provided a sophisticated blend of suppleness and control, ably dealing with the rough stuff without any real abruptness.

Our only note here is that you can hear the suspension working underneath, in an endearingly old-fashioned mechanical way. Odd, but not to a distracting point.

Plus, while there are three levels of regen-braking assistance, we’d like the option of single-pedal driving capability.

Much the same dynamic flair applies to the Interior Package option that swaps out for 20s, except that the ride is clearly just that little bit firmer. But tyre and road drone do seem to drown out the suspension noise at times, but not to any alarming degree. Just in a typically German-engineered vehicle sort of way. No revelations here.

Switching to the VZ is equally revealing.

As you might expect, the extra power and additional (undisclosed) torque from the front electric motor are immediately obvious, elevating its performance significantly. Point, squirt, shoot. This thing really hustles along.

Yet it is the flagship’s balance and control of the chassis that came as a surprise.

Usually, the additional weight of two motors and 21-inch wheels detract from the driving pleasure of many an EV SUV with their shifting mass and heavier feel, but the VZ seemed to contain those tightly, and instead dishes up speed with agility and finesse.

Better still, the top spec’s standard adaptive dampers also seem to help deliver a supple and isolated ride, soaking up bigger potholes and that sort of thing, in a superior way that – we suspect – even the Endurance on 19s likely could not.

Factor in the beautifully nuanced and thoughtfully-tuned driver-assist tech systems, and – after months of driving at-times infuriating SUVs from China – the Chinese-made Tavascan feels anything but rushed or half-baked.

We’re impressed, at least on this first drive.

Ultimately, even after hours and hours behind the wheel, the Tavascan left us wanting more in a good way, not less. That’s a sure sign that the recipe is fundamentally right.

The drive experience can be where a lot of Chinese cars fall down but I walked away less frustrated by the Aion UT.

That’s not to say it will behave as you might expect a low-slung hatchback to. The suspension, for example, is extremely soft as it maintains its original Chinese-market state-of-tune.

This makes the car waft over imperfections on city roads. And in that sense it offers supreme ride comfort in the scenarios it was designed for. However, at the extremes, like some speed bumps, or particularly deep pot holes there can be a surprisingly violent re-bound sending a thud through the cabin.

The other trade-off for soft suspension is less body control. I was surprised to find that the Aion UT holds it together mostly well on a flat country B-road, but when undulations and big dips introduce themselves, the soft suspension can be too slow to react, making the car lose confidence in higher-speed open road scenarios we’re more used to in Australia.

The steering, like many electric cars in this category, is relatively heavily electrically assisted. This makes it light and easy to adjust at low speeds for easy park and maneuverability in the confines of a city. It loses a little bit of road-feel at higher speeds but the Aion UT’s steering is far from the least connected I’ve experienced recently.

One thing it can’t be criticised for is a lack of power. With 150kW instantaneously available the Aion UT has some serious poke and while the ChaoYang tyre package is tuned more for efficiency than grip, it’s again not one of the worst I’ve driven with.

One thing which helps the whole experience along is this car’s hatchback layout. With the weight of the battery low and squat and the wheels all the way out to the edges of the frame, the Aion UT inherently handles decently compared to an electric crossover or small SUV.

Like all Chinese cars, the UT has a host of occasionally frustrating driver aids, which you can read about in the Safety section below. While I was inclined to turn some of the features off after testing them, the alerts are relatively quiet and non-invasive.

Is the UT any good to drive? It’s not bad for the segment, I was largely pleased with how it handled and the power on offer, and while it still has its annoyances, they’re not big deal-breakers. 

The MG4 rear-drive is a better allrounder, while the GWM Ora isn’t as good. I’d say it’s on par with the BYD Dolphin, but they excel in different areas. The Dolphin's a bit sharper in terms of handling but the Aion UT is more comfortable.

As with many Chinese cars the list of active safety equipment is long but that doesn’t mean it’s particularly well calibrated.

Standard gear includes the key stuff like auto emergency braking (AEB), lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and adaptive cruise control. There are also rarer features for an affordable car like this including traffic sign recognition, door open warning, auto high beams and front cross-traffic alert.

On the parking front you get a 360-degree parking camera view as well as front and rear proximity sensors.

There's also an annoying driver monitoring system and one I haven’t seen much in the form of an occupant warning system, which seems to imagine you’re not wearing a seatbelt when you are.

It’s not the only safety system I found myself reaching to turn off. The lane keep assist could occasionally be a bit heavy-handed and the traffic sign alert was typically frustrating. This, sadly, is what we’ve come to expect from these types of systems from many Chinese automakers.

It’s not the most annoying system I’ve used, though, and the alerts are quiet enough and far enough apart that they aren't as intrusive as they can be in some rivals. You can also adjust the tolerance of some of the systems in the (needlessly complicated) menus to make them less annoying.

At the launch, the Aion UT was yet to be rated by ANCAP.

Here’s where the Tavascan loses some steam.

Each Tavascan is covered by a five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty, which is only average nowadays and below the seven and even 10 years that some other EV brands provide. Free roadside assistance is provided for five years.

Service intervals are every two years or 30,000km, at a listed cost of $485 per visit. Alternatively, owners can pre-purchase six-year and 10-year service packages from $1310 and $2190 respectively.

An eight-year/160,000km battery warranty also applies.

Finally, Cupra also provides owners with the option of organising home or workplace AC charging solutions via Jetcharge, offering an $1800 ‘Lite’ or $2300 ‘Maxi’ charger, including installation.

Are all these enough to get the Tavascan over the line for you?

GAC covers this electric hatch with an eight-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, while the brand’s “magazine battery 2.0” is covered by a separate eight-year and 200,000km warranty. Five years of roadside assistance is included.

The Aion UT needs to be serviced once a year or 15,000km. The service price schedule extends all the way out to 240,000km with yearly visits costing between $199 and $640 but for the life of the warranty the average yearly cost comes in at $352.

There are currently 19 GAC dealers in Australia, confined mainly to Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane with a single store in Perth and an outlier in Cairns. No representation yet in Tassie, Canberra, the Northern Territory or SA.