Ssangyong Korando vs Mazda MX-30

What's the difference?

SsangYong’s Korando diesel might not break the mould in any meaningful area, but it certainly has its place as a no frills, feature-rich SUV.

However, buyers that stay in the inner city should probably forgo the diesel in favour of the petrol Korando which costs less to buy, and at this stage, less to fill up.

The diesel engine is a little undercooked and the styling is far from exciting, but the long equipment list, sensible pricing and lengthy warranty period should at least give buyers deadset on a Hyundai Tucson, Mazda CX-5 or Nissan Qashqai pause.

The MX-30 is a tough one to give you a clear verdict on. In summary, though, the math just doesn’t add up. This car is way too expensive and offers next to no range for Australia’s vast intercity distances, essentially resigning buyers to a life within city limits.

On the other hand, I love the design ethos of this little SUV. It’s truly a statement, and it’s rare to find a car that is so committed to its uniqueness. It’s also easily one of the best EVs to drive right now, so those who understand its compromises will no doubt be left with smiles on their faces.

At first glance, the SsangYong Korando might look a bit derivative or even bland, blending elements of the Kia Seltos and Hyundai Tucson.

But did you know the SsangYong Korando predates both aforementioned models? Yep, the fourth-generation broke cover in early 2019, about six months ahead of the Seltos and more than 12 months before the latest Tucson surfaced.

Just because it was first in however, doesn’t mean it is still the best dressed.

To our eye, the Korando is just missing that X factor in aesthetics to really help it stand out from the crowd.

From a distance, it just looks like any other SUV, and isn’t all that distinctive from its rivals.

Sure, the SsangYong grille, sharp front end and foglight arrangement are distinctive enough, but maybe it’s the white of our press car that makes it just seem a little … ordinary.

In profile, the Korando is even more inconspicuous, and even its unique wheels and thick C-pillars do nothing to grab your attention.

The rear end of the Korando might be its best angle, with stand-out tail-light graphics, a chrome centre strip and chunky bumper combining for a little visual pizazz.

Inside, the Korando continues the ho-hum theme with a standard, but lacklustre, dashboard layout and cabin materials.

There’s leather and gloss-black bits to liven things up, but from the centre stack design to the seat inserts, there’s just nothing standout or special about the interior of the Korando.

Don’t get us wrong, we don’t hate the way the Korando looks and feels, its just a bit too Clark Kent and not enough Superman for our tastes.

But if you wanted a mid-size SUV that is inoffensive and blends into the background, this could the car for you.

The MX-30 oozes design. I would go so far as to say this car is more focused on being a design statement than it is an SUV (as evidenced by its lack of practicality…) or an EV (as evidenced by its lack of range…).

Mazda’s Kodo design language is already eye-grabbing, so it’s to the MX-30’s credit that it manages to be striking, even against other members of the Mazda family, as it strays from a well-refined formula.

The large grille has been dumped in favour of something much smaller but the 3D effect of the Kodo face still persists. The light clusters adopt their own personality - they're inspired by the Mazda3, arguably, but they stand on their own.

The side profile, squat dimensions, and contrasting panel work (in our car’s case, a matte grey against the brand’s signature ‘Soul Red’) alert you to the fact that the MX-30 is something quite different indeed. And all this is before you notice the fact that it has clamshell rear doors.

Yep, that’s right, the MX-30 reaches into the brand’s history and brings back the outward folding door design once seen on the RX-8 rotary sports coupe. Opening it up is an event, and those doors wow onlookers with their unusual unfurling. Unfortunately, it’s not as smart as it looks, but we’ll get to that in the practicality part of this review.

The inside again blends familiar Mazda themes with entirely new ones. The material design is incredible. For the first time in a long time, I felt like a kid in some kind of tactile science museum, prodding, squeezing, and scratching at this car’s many interior elements to see if they were, in fact, made of the occasionally unbelievable materials they seem to be.

It doesn’t disappoint. Yes, the door cards really have a splash of an odd grey carpet material, very Volvo, the seats are really trimmed in some sort of synthetic leather, the quality grain of which has to be felt to be understood (it's very Mercedes), and the centre console is really made of recycled cork panelling, which is very BMW.

All of this might sound a bit silly (and the cork stuff perhaps is) but along with the stepped centre console design, weird semi-digital dash cluster and familiar bits out of other Mazdas, it is difficult to not enjoy being in such a creative and unusual space.

The commitment to this funky, unusual design, has some major practicality drawbacks, which we’ll take a look at next.

Measuring 4450mm long, 1870mm wide, 1629mm tall and with a 2675mm wheelbase, the Korando serves as SsangYong’s mid-size SUV competitor against the likes of the Toyota RAV4, Mazda CX-5, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson and Mitsubishi Outlander.

There’s no denying though, that the Korando sits on the smaller end of the mid-size SUV spectrum, being shorter in overall size and wheelbase than even the CX-5 (which we thought was just about big enough for a small family of three).

In fact, the Korando sizes up much closer to something like the new-generation Nissan Qashqai and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross – two models which are classed on the larger end of the small SUV spectrum.

After spending a week with the car, we’d argue the Korando feels much more like a small SUV than a mid-sizer.

In the front seats, there is plenty of space for occupants and there is heaps of adjustability in the seats and steering wheel to get comfortable.

Storage solutions include door pockets, cupholders and an underarm cubby, but the tray found just in front of the shifter could use a raised lip or grippier surface so your phone and wallet don’t slide around while driving.

The second row is also plenty spacious, with enough leg-, head- and shoulder-room for our six-foot-tall (183cm) frame, even behind the driver’s seat in our desired position.

Of course, the middle seat is a little compromised thanks to the transmission tunnel eating in the footwell and the slightly higher seating position, but it will do in a pinch.

And in the second row, occupants are treated to a bottle holder in the door, a fold-down armrest (in lieu of the middle seat), a 12-volt charging socket and back-seat map pockets, but a big omission is the lack of air vents – which could be a dealbreaker for some families.

The second-row does offer more room than expected of a car this size, but opening the boot reveals how SsangYong has managed to make the rear seats more comfortable – it has sacrificed storage volume.

The boot will swallow 407 litres with all seats in place, which is smaller than the Mazda CX-5, Nissan Qashqai and only two litres more than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross.

Fold the seats down and volume swells to just 1104L.

Don’t get us wrong, you’ll still be able to fit your weekly groceries in the boot or a full-size pram, but it will be a stretch for both.

Put simply, the MX-30 is about as practical as a sports coupe, which is a feat given it has the footprint and height of an SUV.

It starts with those clamshell doors. Sure, they look amazing, but they’re annoying to open because the handle is on the inside, so you have to open the front doors before you can open the rear ones. At best this costs you time when you’re just trying to load objects, pets, or kids, at worst it makes the rear of the cabin nearly impossible to access in a tight car park.

Even in my unit parking spot, I could barely access the rear seats, making it especially annoying when I just wanted to chuck a bag in the rear footwell.

Even if you don’t have trouble getting an adult back there, space is limited. Behind my own driving position, my knees were up against the seat in front, and while I had plenty of headroom, it feels a bit claustrophobic, thanks to the tiny windows and high beltline.

I’ll hand some credit to the commitment to this car’s design, though, the odd carpet trims continue into the rear doors, and there's even a plush padded surface for your elbows on either side. Nice touch. The seats also feel unusually low and sporty for an SUV, particularly an electric one.

As if it couldn’t be more clear that this car has the intention of being some sort of sports coupe, the front seats are lovely. Comfortable, supportive, and with plenty of soft trims throughout the cabin, I felt as though I had plenty of room here. The raised console design means the multimedia functions and toggles were easy to reach and use, and while the climate functions are somewhat awkwardly placed on a touch panel, at least they were set and forget most of the time.

There’s a tactile dial for volume control, and although the multimedia interface is dial-based rather than touch, Mazda’s system is one of the easiest to use once you get used to it.

There’s a large storage area under the centre console, hosting two USB ports and a household power outlet, and atop that there’s a cork-finished tray, which flips up to reveal dual bottle holders in the centre. Behind this there’s a small armrest console box, trimmed in the same plush padding as the doors and seats. Front occupants can also make use of small pockets in the doors and a glovebox.

Unlike some electric cars, the MX-30 doesn’t score a ‘frunk’, which seems like a wasted opportunity because the engine bay is half empty. Serviceable items look incredibly easy to access because of this, with liquid tanks and coolant hoses on display, but I can’t help but feeling Mazda could have put a small storage space here with some packaging trickery. It’s equally possible that there’s a crash-safety consideration, however.

Moving to the boot, and unfortunately there’s a small-hatch-sized 311 litres on offer, because there’s also next to no underfloor space, and you’ll have to store your charging cables in there, too, further reducing the space. With the cable bags strapped in place, the boot fit our largest (124L) CarsGuide travel case with little extra room to spare. It’s weekender luggage space at best, but then I suppose you won’t be able to go away for long with the range on offer anyway…

The price and features equation for electric cars is somewhat different from the status quo of their combustion equivalents. You can’t just consider standard spec inclusions, there’s a need to factor in range and charging capability, too, as battery capacity and AC to DC charging converters can have a dramatic effect on the cost.

Frustratingly for Mazda’s EV offering, the sums don’t add up as neatly as I’d like them to. The MX-30 EV is available in one top-spec trim, the E35 Astina, which wears a before-on-roads cost (MSRP) of $65,490.

This places it in the same league as the Hyundai Kona electric Highlander ($66,000), Kia Niro EV S ($67,490), and Tesla Model 3 Standard Range + which just had a significant price cut ($59,900).

To make things worse for our fledging Mazda EV, it has a WLTP-rated range of just 200km (or 225km using the ADR method)! There’s no two ways about it; this is pitiful in the face of the aforementioned rivals, all of which offer ranges in excess of 420km when measured against the same standard. Even the much cheaper base-model Nissan Leaf ($49,990) offers 270km of range.

You can’t not factor this in with an EV purchase, particularly in Australia where grand distances between cities essentially rules out any intercity trips for the MX-30 EV.

The brand is hoping this car’s funky and innovative design cues, which we’ll talk about in the next part of this review, will win the hearts of city-slickers, but the MX-30 is not lacking on the standard equipment front, either.

Stuff you’ll get out of the box includes 18-inch alloy wheels, an 8.8-inch multimedia screen (which, like this car’s CX-30 and Mazda3 siblings is a non-touch unit, controlled through a central dial), Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, a 7.0-inch semi-digital dash cluster, Bose 12-speaker premium audio, built-in sat-nav, head-up display, semi leather synthetic interior trim, full LED exterior lighting, a holographic head-up display, single-zone climate control with its own 7.0-inch touch panel controller, heated front seats, as well as keyless entry with push-start ignition.

The MX-30 has some unique interior materials, and I’m not sure why more EVs don’t have a full-size domestic power socket, as this car does under the centre console at the front. Handy for when you need to charge household devices larger than a phone on-the-go (hair-curling tongs perhaps?). There are a few spec omissions, however. Dual-zone climate, power seat adjust, and a wireless phone charger are chief among the missing.

Powering the SsangYong Korando Ultimate Diesel is 1.6-litre turbo-diesel engine.

Peak power is 100kW at 4000rpm, while maximum torque of 324Nm is available from 1500-2500rpm.

Those outputs are well down on rival cars, which range from 137kW/416Nm in the Tucson and Sportage, to 140kW/450Nm in the CX-5 – though competitors all use larger engines.

Drive is sent to all four wheels via a six-speed automatic transmission, making the diesel-powered Korando the only SsangYong mid-size SUV that is not front-wheel drive.

SsangYong also includes a drive-mode selector, with functionality for Normal, Sport and Winter settings.

The MX-30 has an electric motor on the front axle with a single-speed reduction-gear transmission. It produces low-sounding figures of 107kW and 271Nm of torque, which is less than most of its rivals, although it has more power and less torque than the equivalently sized (but much cheaper) MG ZS EV.

Although these power figures don’t look as impressive as rivals, it’s worth remembering that the MX-30 has much less weight to carry around, so when it comes to driving it’s a much better story than it appears. More on that later.

The MX-30 offers three levels of regenerative braking, controlled through the wheel-mounted paddle-shifters, a necessary touch, and one that offers decent feedback on how your driving style is affecting range, via the dash and multimedia screen.

Official fuel consumption figures for the SsangYong Korando Ultimate Diesel are pegged at 6.4 litres per 100km, while emissions are 170 grams of CO2 per 100km.

In our week with the car, we managed an average of 8.2L/100km, with our driving primarily focused on short, inner-city journeys.

While the Korando is relatively frugal on diesel compared with some its larger and more powerful rivals, keep in mind that diesel prices are much higher than petrol at the moment.

The MX-30 has some advantages here, in that its tiny (35.5kWh to be precise) lithium-ion battery pack means it charges up pretty quickly. The downside? It’s not as quick as it could be, and its efficiency leaves a little to be desired.

As already discussed at length, this small battery means a very short range – between 200 and 224km depending on which standard you want to go by, and the MX-30 is claimed to consume 18.5kWh of energy on the combined cycle.

This is disappointing because not only is the claim higher than rivals like the Kona electric and Nissan Leaf, but in reality, I couldn’t best it with predominantly city driving, as I have previously been able to in all its rivals. Over some 250km of testing I managed a dash-reported 18.9kWh/100km.

The MX-30 EV takes a European-standard Type 2 CCS charger, the most popular kind in Australia, and will charge up at a rate of 50kW on DC or 6.6kW on AC.

It would have been nice to see that boosted to at least 7.2kW AC to be a bit more competitive on AC charging speed. For a car that will need to be charged frequently, even a 10-minute difference in charging time is important. While 50kW DC is about right for a battery pack this size, I assume there will be cooling issues pushing that to 100kW+ as the Hyundai Kona electric and Tesla Model 3 with nearly twice the battery size are capable of.

Mazda estimates a charge time of 36 minutes on DC, three hours on a three-phase AC charger, or nine hours from a ~2.4kW wall outlet. I charged my MX-30 a single time before returning it, from about 10 – 80 per cent, with it maxing out at around 50kW. It charged in less than 40 minutes, however, as promised.

If the brief for the Korando is to be easy and unintimidating to drive, then SsangYong has nailed it.

From the driver’s seat, the Korean mid-size SUV makes you feel comfortable and confident, and the steering – while a little on the numb and light side – is communicative enough at slower speeds around town.

The diesel engine as found in our test car, however, does feel lacklustre, even if just accelerating to 60km/h.

The asthmatic powertrain struggles even more at freeway speeds, and coming up to speed at an onramp really highlights how gutless the 100kW/324Nm engine is.

However, the flip side of all this is that the Korando doesn’t really do anything unexpected or surprising.

In the same way you might order a salad for brunch, the Korando’s engine feels just about adequate enough to keep you going and is a safe choice for those that might not be all that adventurous.

However, there is a drive-mode selector on offer to change things from Normal to Sport or Winter.

Switch it over to Sport mode, and things liven up with the Korando feeling more responsive, but we can’t help but feel this mode should be the default tune.

One oddity we did note is that switching from Normal mode to Sport requires a turn of the dial to the right, but turning the dial to the left does not return it to the default setting.

In fact, turning the dial to the left does nothing, and to get it back into normal mode, it’s another turn to the right.

All of this is to say, the ergonomics of the Korando feel a little half-baked, and a little more time in development could have ironed out these issues.

Usually, it’s easier here to talk about how electric cars are different from their combustion counterparts, or how they are great for an electric car. In the case of the MX-30, however, it’s just a great car to drive.

I’ll admit, I didn’t expect this little EV to match, much less exceed the driving experience of its CX-30 sibling, but it was a pleasant surprise to find out how great it was.

It turns out that having a much smaller battery, and therefore a much lower kerb weight than most EVs, means the MX-30 feels light, agile, and rapid compared to all of its rivals, which goes some way to making up for its lesser outputs.

In fact, I had no trouble with the motor at all, with the MX-30 feeling faster and more responsive than the Hyundai Kona electric or the Kia Niro EV.

Mazda’s handling prowess is also on full show here, with the smooth and accurate steering allowing me to point this little SUV with remarkable accuracy. The steering tune is lighter than the Kona electric, but a bit more significant than the Kia Niro's. It emboldens you to have a bit of fun, and again, unlike rivals, Mazda’s suspension tune has your back.

It’s sporty enough to engage you, but not so firm that it sends tremors through the cabin, an impressive feat considering it has a less complex torsion bar rear. If anyone had asked me, I would have sworn it was multi-link all-round.

The whole experience feels very similar to helming the CX-30 or Mazda3, but I’d even say the MX-30 feels better over the front end, with less rough rebound than its siblings.

It also makes a cool noise. Mazda have given the MX-30 an artificial tone, plumbed through the speakers, and unlike the science-fiction hum generated by the Hyundai group EVs, the Mazda’s is a warm drone, more reminiscent of a combustion engine.

To be clear here, the MX-30 is no Tesla Model 3. That car is seriously rapid, with mind-bending handling, although I will say there’s a certain poise and refinement to the way the Mazda drives. Even in the corners, it’s confidence inspiring, with the torque-vectoring magic built into the electric motor on full show.

Perhaps one of the reasons that this car is a tad less efficient than its rivals is its lack of weight, which would allow more energy to be fed back into the battery during regenerative braking. Or perhaps its regen braking modes are a bit too forgiving, either way it’s nice that the Mazda offers three easily controllable levels via the paddle-shifters. I even became a fan of the quaint analogue power dial, even if it does give you a bit less feedback than the sleek software suites in Hyundai Group or Tesla offerings.

The MX-30, then, hits an unexpected niche. The benefits of its smaller battery pack and a focus on handling make this car one of the best EVs to drive today, even if you’re restricted to city limits, and regular recharging.

Like all recently launched Mazdas, the MX-30 is packed full of advanced ‘i-Activesense’ safety gear. In terms of cutting-edge items, this includes freeway-speed auto emergency braking, now with low-speed intersection assist as well as pedestrian and cyclist detection, lane-keep assist with lane-departure warning, blind-spot monitoring with active intervention, as well as front and rear cross traffic alert, with rear emergency braking.

The MX-30 also has the expected suite of electronic assistance but goes further to include torque vectoring and has a total of 10 airbags – a lot for a very small cabin. It also comes packed standard with front and rear parking sensors, as well as a 360-degree parking camera suite. It’s amongst the best safety suites in terms of pure features in the small SUV segment.

The MX-30 has a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating to the 2020 standards.

Like all new SsangYongs sold in Australia, the Korando comes with a seven year/unlimited kilometre warranty – matching the likes of Kia and falling short of the industry-leading 10-year warranty offered by Mitsubishi.

Scheduled service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first, which matches the industry standard.

The first five years of maintenance will set owners back $1580 or $316 each.

However, keep in mind there will be additional service items that need to be addressed such as a urea fill ($51.32 every 10,000km), a brake fluid change ($121.44 every 24 months) and a kit-fuel filter ($146.14 every 25 months or 30,000km).

SsangYong lists the prices of all its services on its website.

The MX-30 is covered by Mazda’s industry-standard five-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, while the battery pack is covered by a separate eight-year promise, on par with its Korean rivals. Mazda includes roadside assist for the duration of the warranty.

The EV has service intervals of 12 months or 15,000km whichever occurs first, and a five-year service plan comes in at $1273.79, working out to an average of $254.76 a year. That’s getting close to Toyota levels of cheap servicing, and so it should, given electric cars (at least in theory) have much less to attend to when it comes service time.