Skoda Enyaq vs Mazda Cx-6E

What's the difference?

The Enyaq facelift is a big deal, and hopefully the start of a fresh era for Skoda, marking a long-overdue return to brand values. Its first Toyota RAV4-sized family EV SUV nails it for value, functionality, comfort, ease, driving enjoyment, efficiency and even the overall ownership experience.

We have yet to drive the base 60 Select with that headline low price so cannot make a definitive call, but the more-expensive 85 Sportline proves Skoda is taking the family EV very, very seriously. Consumers considering a BYD Sealion 7, Kia EV5 or Tesla Model Y would do themselves a disservice to not check out the Enyaq first. The most convincing Skoda in years.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

It might be the product of the brand's Chinese partnership, and in fact it might not even be a Mazda under the skin, but it definitely feels more like the Japanese brand than you might be expecting.

Does it feel quite enough like a Mazda? That's going to be up to you. But it certainly looks the part, inside and out.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

Note: The author, Andrew Chesterton, is a co-owner of Smart As Media, a content agency and media distribution service with a number of automotive brands among its clients. When producing content for CarsGuide, he does so in accordance with the CarsGuide Editorial Guidelines and Code of Ethics, and the views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author.

Fun fact. The Czech-built Enyaq’s handsome nose treatment was inspired by the Mandalorian helmet in the Star Wars universe. It’s a massive improvement over the old Kodiaq-esque proboscis that the previous version wore, almost as a mask of apology for being an EV.

Along with the addition of a more-traditional SUV bodystyle that seems to really suit the restyled front, key changes include improved airflow for some pretty impressive efficiency-enhancing aerodynamics (now down slightly to 0.225 Cd and 0.24 Cd for the Coupe and SUV, respectively), varying LED lighting elements according to grade, redesigned wheels, new colours and the abolition of the old Skoda logo for lettering.

Compared to the pre-facelift version, the new Coupe is 5.0mm longer at 4658mm, the same width at 1879mm, 2.0mm higher at 1623mm and 1.0mm-longer in wheelbase at 2766mm. Except for being 1.0mm shorter, surprisingly, these are also the same dimensions for the latest SUV shape.

The Enyaq’s cabin has been subtly revised as well, with a larger touchscreen boasting physical buttons and updated software for improved functionality, though the basics – which have always been sound – remain.

Being a more practical and family-orientated model, the SUV seems more consistent with Skoda's no-nonsense brand values, putting function over form. If you want form over function, go for the (albeit still practical) Enyaq Coupe.

Mazda's designer is rightly proud of what he's managed to achieve here, and says every panel, and everything you touch inside, is Japanese, not Chinese. 

The brand has inarguably made a very attractive SUV here. It’s sleek and modern feeling, but it has soul and character, too. Oh, and the brand insists the aerodynamic raised air curtain on the bonnet was done by Mazda first, and not the Ferrari Luce.

The black and swept-back roofline lends a sporty feel, too, while both the 19- and 21-inch alloy options suit the vibe.

But there is one view I’m not keen on, and that’s standing (or driving) directly behind it. Stay close to the car and you don’t really notice it, but take a few steps back — or follow behind one — and the rear end looks somehow blobby and out of proportion.

It's the one weak spot in an otherwise very good looking package.

The Mazda treatment has occurred in the cabin, too, and the touchpoints are suitably plush, though it is entirely lacking in tactile buttons or switches.

Pride of place instead is the massive screen, which is a whopping 26.4 inches. Honestly, though, only about half of that is of any real use. The passenger side has super limited functionality – it's limited to stuff like changing the theme of the screen or the radio station – and so it feels wasted and a bit pointless on that side of the cabin.

Either Enyaq body style majors on practicality. Large doors open wide, high seating points allow for easy entry/egress, and – once sat – there is an abundance of interior space. Like, heaps.

Where the SUV beats the Coupe is in extra glass area, since the higher – or more formal – roofline allows for bigger windows that in turn improve vision out. And more cargo capacity of course.

Only two 85 Sportline models were available for us to review at the launch, so we cannot tell you about the feel and finish in the new base 60 Select grade. But in Sportline, the ambience bristles with upmarket aspiration, thanks to synthetic leather/suede trim, high-quality plastics and nice contrasting materials. Showy but not overdone.

No complaints about the driving position either, due to a pleasing amount of seat adjustment. Those sporty buckets, by the way, are superb (pun intended) providing ample comfort and support. They look cool, too.

The VW Group has obviously listened to criticism over the glitchy electronic multimedia interface in the earlier MEB vehicles, because the 2026 Enyaq’s 13-inch touchscreen is blissfully easy and drama-free. It may not have the crisp modernity of the vast all-in-one displays found in most Chinese alternatives, but for functionality, it gets the job done.

Key points to keep in mind are that all the major vehicle controls, from climate and audio to phone and car settings, are accessed via buttons or toggles either permanently on the screen or as actual hard switches below the vents.

As such, the display is responsive, feels slick to the touch and looks the business, and doesn’t even attempt to distract you to the degree of many others. Even the volume slider is effective. Possibly the best ever experienced.

Even in driving rain and ensconced in thick fog, the ventilation system made light work of clearing the screen and maintaining the desired temperature. You gotta love German cars for that. Myriad storage options include a hungry glove box, handy centre console with ratcheting armrest for extra comfort and even flocked door bins for bottles and other bits and bobs. And let’s not even mention the umbrella storage within. Skoda’s most enduring calling card, surely.

Result? There aren't shortcuts inside today’s Enyaq, making this one of the most thoughtfully presented EVs, period.

Likewise, the rear seat. Large in structure and equally-friendly in nature, you could be forgiven for thinking you’re sat in an Audi, such is the look and feel in the 85 Sportline. Surely to the annoyance of Q4 e-tron owners. We imagine the 60 Select would seem more like a grey flannel suit, texturally speaking. Which has its own aesthetic appeal for some.

The wide (fixed) bench should fit three across in comfort, vision out is enhanced by narrow front seats to lessen the sense of confinement, and all the little helpful things are present and ready to serve. Vents for faces. Temperature controls. USB outlets for devices. An armrest for elbows. Two types of cupholders – as over-engineered in said armrest as the one within a removable caddy on the floor feels flimsy. Door storage for days. Slots for phones. Sleeves for maps. Lighting for reading. Handles for scaredy cats. And hooks for coats. Skoda puts the metaphorical yak in Enyaq.

Finally, in the business end out back is a massive load area, defined by a high-opening (and powered, remember) tailgate, low ‘n flat floor and typically sensible additions like standard charging cables, remote seat-back folding, shopping hooks, underfloor storage and extra lighting. Capacity is 585 litres in the SUV, up from 570L in the Coupe, while extending the luggage area by dropping those 60/40 seatbacks boost volumes to 1710L and 1610L respectively. Great for sleeping in. Braked trailer towing capacity is 1000kg.

About the only real black mark is the lack of a spare wheel, which could turn a trip away into a nightmare. Instead, the poor Enyaq owner and their family must rely on a tyre inflation kit, which is useless if the wheel has been gashed and is expensive to replace. Destroys the tyre even if it’s just a fixable puncture. Not good enough.

Otherwise, you’ll struggle to find a more-complete, family-focused medium SUV EV. Singles should get a kick out of it too.

At 4850mm long and 1620mm tall, the CX-6e is longer but lower than the CX-5. But I'm 175cm, and I had no problem getting comfortable in the backseat. The leg room is huge, and I didn't find the headroom an issue at all, with clear air above me, even with the swept back roofline.

That's probably the biggest practicality perk here, with the backseat properly cavernous in that way they often are in modern EVs. There are also air vents and temperature controls for backseat riders, as well as cupholders in the middle-seat pulldown divider.

At the boot, you'll find 363 litres of storage space measured to the parcel tray (so more if you stack to the ceiling), and a total 1434 litres should you fold the second row and load all the way to the ceiling.

What you won't find, though, is a spare tyre. If you get stuck, a puncture kit is your only hope.

Discounting temporary drive-away offers, the Mazda CX-6e range opens at $53,990 plus on-road costs for the GT, and then climbs to $56,990 for the flagship Azami. There’s not a huge gap between those numbers, and that’s because both cars share the same battery and engine, and a lot of the same equipment.

As I write, the cheapest Tesla Model Y (the big dog in the electric SUV fight) is $58,900, so you'd have to argue Mazda has the pricing right.

The GT opens with:

• 19-inch alloys
• LED lighting
• Panoramic glass roof
• Black Maztech trim
• Heated and ventilated front seats
• A massive 26.45-inch multimedia screen
• Head-up display
• Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
• 21-speaker stereo

Stepping up to the Azami gets you bigger 21-inch alloys and digital wing mirrors — the latter of which I don’t like.

If it was my money, you’d find me in a GT.

Note there is no under-bonnet storage in this EV. Or even a motor in the rear-drive 60 and 85 grades. You’ll find that by the rear axle, instead.

It is a permanently excited synchronous unit, driving the rear wheels via a single-speed transmission.

In the 60 Select, it makes 150kW of power and 310Nm of torque, to propel the base Enyaq from 0-100km/h in 8.1 seconds, on the way to a 160km/h top speed.

Meanwhile, the 85 Sportline lives up to its name with a 210kW/545Nm upgrade, slashing the 0-100km/h time to 6.7s whilst increasing top speed to 180km/h.

There’s a single motor at the rear axle, making 190kW and 290Nm. Not a huge torque figure, but I like the way that the power is delivered here. It doesn’t feel overly aggressive, but it doesn’t feel underpowered either.

How efficient are these newly-more-aerodynamic Skoda EV SUVs?

The Australian official combined energy consumption average is 15.9kWh/100km for the 85 Sportline SUV and 15.5 for the Coupe version, with the latter’s swoopier lines contributing to the lower figure.

That also translates to better WLTP range at 561km versus 547km in the 85 Sportline SUV.

No local consumption numbers are yet available for the 60 Select, but in Europe it averages 15.1kWh/100km; the WLTP range is 410km.

AC charging is 11kW and DC charging is 165kW in the 60 Select and 135kW in the others. The lower figure reflects better thermal management whilst still achieving the same result.

Charging from empty to full at home using a normal plug could take up to 40 hours, or nearly 13hr with an optional 7.0kW wallbox, while using a common 50kW DC fast charger on the go to get a top-up to 80 per cent takes about 80 minutes.

One of the benefits of the smaller-battery Enyaq 60 is that those charging times can be cut by about 20 per cent.

So much for the theory. Out in the real world, we managed to consume around 16.1 kilowatt hours per 100km in the standard Sportline, and 16.5kWh/100km in the Ultimate version with the larger 21-inch wheel and tyre package.

That's still pretty efficient.

Delivering the range is a 78kWh LFP battery, producing a WLTP driving range of up to 484kms. The DC charge rate is capped at 194kW, which should take you from 10-80 per cent charged in 24 minutes. AC charging is up to 11kW, too.

Sadly, no Enyaq 60 Select was available at the launch event – understandable given it won’t arrive at Skoda dealers until November.

But we were in for a treat anyway, because, on the strength of the 85 Sportline, the Enyaq shines, emphatically, solving a riddle as to why European reviewers have been so partial to this model since it debuted in late 2020. And the Series II facelift we have here only serves to heighten the experience.

This is a rapid EV off the line, as the 6.7-second 0-to-100km/h figure attests to. Out on Australian real-world roads, it feels even stronger than that, with urgent acceleration and instant throttle response. And all while being really very smooth, premium-luxury smooth. We’ve driven the Q4 e-tron and Cupra Tavascan with the same powertrain and we’d struggle to tell them apart from behind the wheel.

And so on to the steering, handling and roadholding.

The Enyaq behind the wheel feels light but planted, with just enough feel and interaction for the driver to feel involved and connected. Armed with a trick variable-ratio steering rack, the way the 85 Sportline tips into corners so fluidly, even at higher speeds, reveals a reassuring level of body control. And this isn’t even the RS AWD performance version.

We had reservations about this grade’s standard 20-inch wheel and tyre set-up, with passive suspension, but we need not have worried… as much.

Over quite bad roads in NSW's Hunter Valley, the Skoda dealt with larger bumps well, if also always firmly. Rarely was the ride jarring, but occasional jolts were felt over smaller-frequency stuff. We feel this would be more of an issue in the inner-urban big-city streetscapes, but were not able to assess that at this time.

In contrast, the 21-inch Ultimate version, with adaptive dampers, smothered over much of what the bitumen threw up at us, soaking up the surface in similar fashion to most luxury SUVs fitted with active suspension tech. There’s still an underlying stiffness there, but you’d never call it uncomfortable.

There's a bit too much road noise coming through, though, making that the Enyaq’s biggest dynamic complaint, regardless of specification. Again, the (Pirelli-shod) 21s did it better than the 20s. We wonder what the 19-inch 60 Select version will ride and sound like inside.

Otherwise, the Enyaq is almost annoyingly difficult to fault.

Progressive and instantaneous braking, a well-managed level of regenerative braking, a very tight turning circle, easy vision out to further boost driving confidence, and nuanced advanced driving-assist system (ADAS) intervention all elevate the Skoda way above most rivals, especially those from China with inadequate Australian-road tuning. This is how it’s done, folks.

So, yes, on initial acquaintance, Skoda’s first EV is impressively sorted, offering something for the driver and their occupants. It drives like a much-newer vehicle than its five years on the world market suggests.

Clearly, the brand has had time to iron out the bugs and what we're left with is a very user-friendly, easy and enjoyable EV SUV.

It's not just outside and in the cabin where Mazda has worked its magic, it has done a whole bunch of stuff under the skin as well, retuning things like the steering, the suspension and the brakes, changing the tyre brand, and tweaking the damping to deliver a car that drives more like a Mazda than what you might of an electric Chinese SUV.

And it does feel more engaged from behind the wheel, but it also feels a little bit like Mazda has done the very best they can do with the package they've been given, rather than start from a clean sheet of paper.

There are some elements of the drive experience I'm not 100 per cent convinced by. One of them is a fairly busy ride, even on relatively smooth and straight roads, where it can feel a bit bouncy through the suspension. And another is the fact that it feels like it's been dialed up to 11 in places – the accelerator, for example, is super responsive, so even breathing on it can get that kind of surging feeling through the cabin, reminding you to be a little bit more gentle with your inputs.

Elsewhere, though, it is a composed and quiet package. We did a lot of driving through the city and then on flowing country roads, and it handled it all well. In fact, Melbourne is beset by potholes at the moment, and I actually targeted a few of them to see how it would handle them, and while the ride can feel busy in places, it does also soak up those really big road imperfections really well.

The two-tonne-plus kerb weight only really lets itself be known in super tight and twisty stuff. Otherwise, the CX-6e is happy just to flow along, a feeling helped by the not-stratospheric power outputs which suit the nature of this electric Mazda, too. 

If you were to blindfold me, I probably wouldn't immediately guess that I was driving a Mazda, but equally, I wouldn't say I was driving some new brand of Chinese SUV either. I think it straddles those two worlds, and it does it pretty well.

There’s no ANCAP rating yet, but Mazda is hopeful of five stars. It is waiting for EuroNCAP testing, but for now the CX-6e launches as an unrated vehicle.

I do like the fact that both models share the same safety package (I don't think you should have to spend more money to be safer), which means things like:

• Rear cross-traffic alert
• Auto emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian and cyclist detection
• Seven airbags
• 360-degree camera and more

Not all of it feels particularly Mazda, though. The driver attention monitor, for example, gets more annoying the more time you spend with it (every time you yawn it will tell you to pull over, for example), and the over-speed warning chirps you every time you stray over the limit by even a kay or two.

You’re also in for decent peace of mind, thanks to Skoda’s seven-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty. Service intervals are every two years or 30,000km – whichever comes first. An eight-year/160,000km traction battery warranty also applies.

No capped-price servicing is offered, but pre-paid service packs have been announced for the 85 Sportline models. These are an eight-year/120,000km offer at $1650 (which averages out annually to $206) or a 10-year/150,000km offer at $1950 (which averages out to $195 annually).

There are over 40 Skoda dealers dotted around Australia, and around 65 authorised servicing outlets, some of which are general Volkswagen dealer centres.

All extremely competitive, especially for a German-owned European brand. Which sums the Enyaq up to a tee.

The CX-6e is covered by Mazda’s five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, which is a little underwhelming by today’s standards. The battery is covered for eight years or 160,000kms.

Service intervals are 12 months or 20,000kms, and a capped-price servicing program will see you paying a total $1860 over the first five years of ownership.