MG Cyberster vs BMW I4

What's the difference?

The Cyberster is certainly an impressive thing in a lot of ways, but if you were expecting a perfect sports car from MG, you'll be a bit disappointed. 

It's quite expensive if you're looking for a nice EV, but on the flip side it's quite cheap if being fast is your main concern.

If anything, the Cyberster is an exciting look at what the brand is capable of, even if it's a bit rough around the edges.

If you’re intimidated by the electric future, don't be, because BMW’s i4 is just as good as any non-M sedan BMW offers right now.

The i4 delivers all the things you love about a 3 Series, engaging driving dynamics, a well-appointed interior and comfortable ride, but its all-electric powertrain means you’ll never have to stop at a servo again.

With a large battery on board, the i4 also serves up a decent driving range that should put anxiety-prone EV drivers at ease.

That is, of course, if you can get onboard with the looks.

MG reckons the Cyberster draws on the proportions of classic roadsters like its MG A and B from the ‘50s and ‘60s.

And I reckon that’s about where the comparison ends, really.

But don’t get me wrong, I think it’s got some pretty angles and nice elements.

It’s got the long bonnet, but its cabin isn't set so far back and its aerodynamic lines and curves probably weren't a priority back then either.

This is the standard colour, English White, which is more like off-white or cream or beige.

You can have a red roof on the lighter colours, white, silver, and grey, but red and yellow Cybersters have black ones.

The tail-lights at the back were inspired by the union jack, but they’re probably one of the elements on this car I'd put in the ‘tacky’ column.

If the i4 looks familiar, that’s because it is based on the 4 Series Gran Coupe that entered showrooms last year.

This means a four-door liftback body style with a sloping roofline, athletic proportions and sizing close to the Tesla Model 3 and Polestar 2.

Let’s get it out of the way early and talk about the elephant in the room, the oversized front grille.

Say whatever you want about it, there’s no denying it gives the i4 a unique and head-turning look, and in my opinion, it’s not too bad.

In the flesh, it really isn’t as big as the press photos have made it out to be, and with the front numberplate to split it up, it does start to look a bit more like a traditional grille.

In profile, the 19-inch wheels fill out the arches well, and hide the massive brakes that add to the i4’s sporty appearance.

I particularly like the almost flush door handles that look futuristic, but aren’t as pretentious as those retractable handles you see on Teslas and Range Rovers.

Slim tail-lights and a chunky bumper inform the styling of the i4’s rear, but we’re really not a fan of a rear diffuser that keeps the exhaust cut-outs.

It makes sense on a model like the 4 Series Gran Coupe, but it just looks look rather odd on an all-electric model like the i4.

While the outside of the i4 might be all about that big grille, the inside is all about big screens, two of them in fact.

The instrumentation and multimedia screens dominate the experience inside, but BMW has also included physical buttons on the steering wheel and centre stack, as well as a rotary control knob, to make navigating the menus that much easier.

The connected screens differentiate the i4 from its 4 Series Gran Coupe relative, and make the cabin feel futuristic and befitting of the all-electric powertrain.

Overall, the i4’s styling might not be to everyone’s tastes, but BMW definitely gets credit for being bold in its aesthetic choices.

Would have been nice to see BMW’s designers go a bit further in differentiating the i4 from its 4 Series Gran Coupe cousin, but there's no denying the head-turning appeal of this all-electric sedan.

A three-screen dash sounds a little daunting at first, but it’s not that far from the giant screens in some new cars now.

The central 10.25-inch screen is info only, while the flanking 7.0-inch screens are touchscreens, as is the climate control screen in the console.

As much as I’m a fan of physical buttons where possible, this car shows that multiple screens means you don’t need many sub-menus.

Basically, this feels like a lot, but you get used to it relatively quickly.

And while it also seems like MG’s software has become more intuitive and less laggy, the placements of the screens is a little annoying - the side screens on the dash are blocked by the steering wheel, and the central touchscreen is a bit fiddly.

Like I mentioned, no wireless phone mirroring is a let-down and there’s not really an obvious place to put a phone, but the ability to level out the cup holders is kind of interesting and the central storage where the USB-A and C ports are is big enough.

There’s a narrow bit of storage behind the seats, but the boot is actually 249 litres and seems much more usable than you might expect.

It's also worth noting the Cyberster comes with an AC slow charging cable as standard, but not a DC fast-charging cable for plugging in at some charging stations.

As a premium mid-sized sedan, the BMW i4 offers up enough storage and space for most, but keep in mind there are limitations.

From the driver’s seat, everything is well placed and the electronically adjustable seats offer plenty of adjustability to get comfy for long road trips.

Storage options include an central cubby, glove box, two cupholders and small door pockets that just about fit a bottle, but the design means it rattles around a little.

Speaking of fiddly, between this car, and the weird plastic cowl thing found in the Z4 and 1 Series, BMW needs to be called out for some of the most annoying wireless smartphone charger designs.

This one is tucked all the way under a retractable lid, and is barely wide enough to fit some flagship-sized phones.

However, we will give BMW huge props for its iDrive8 multimedia system, which is displayed on a huge 14.9-inch screen.

The menus are clear, concise and intuitive, while the software is buttery smooth and responsive. It feels snappier than some phones we’ve used in the past.

Credit too for not making all inputs touch, as there is a rotary control knob and voice command capability available.

In the second row, things are a little more cramped, but at 183cm tall I can fit in the outboard seats with tight headroom.

There’s enough leg and shoulder-room, too, and passengers can make use of the climate controls, USB-C charging ports and a fold-down-centre armrest with two cupholders.

Opening the boot reveals 470 litres of volume, but fold the rear seats down and that pace swells to 1290L.

Loading large and bulky items is made much easier thanks to the liftback design, and it’s important to note i4 buyers aren't penalised in terms of practicality as the i4 and 4 Series Gran Coupe share the same boot capacity.

However, the charging cables can get in the way, as there isn’t any dedicated space for them.

The charging point is also in an annoying spot, in the right-rear fender where the petrol cap would be.

It means that you always have to reverse into charging spots, and it can be tricky to manoeuvre the i4 into just the right position to get the charging cable to reach.

The Nissan Leaf's front centre charging port, or the dual charging ports available on the left and right fenders in the Audi e-tron or Porsche Taycan are preferable.

With a name like i4, you might be mistaken for thinking this is the sequel to the cute and quirky i3 hatchback released back in 2014.

But sorry duology fans, it isn’t.

Based on the same platform as the ever-popular 3 Series, the i4 is essentially an all-electric version of BMW’s 4 Series Gran Coupe.

And sadly, in 2022 an all-electric powertrain means a price premium.

The i4 kicks off at $99,900, before on-road costs, for this eDrive40 grade - $16,000 more expensive than the comparable 430i Gran Coupe.

Standard equipment includes 19-inch wheels, LED headlights, keyless entry, push-button start, 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, head-up display, wireless smartphone charging, sports seats, three-zone climate control, interior ambient lighting and a powered tailgate.

Handling multimedia duties is a humungous 14.9-inch touchscreen display, powered by BMW’s latest 'iDrive8' software with features including satellite navigation, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto support, a 10-speaker sound system and digital radio.

Stepping up to the M50 version adds laser headlights, a rear spoiler, sunroof, 16-speaker sound system, metallic paint and heated front seats, but also moves the asking price to $124,900, or $9000 pricier than that M440i Gran Coupe.

Of course, the i4 M50 also scores a dual-motor, all-wheel drive set-up and more potent performance, but we’ll go into more detail about that a little later on.

Is $100,000 too much to pay for an electric mid-sized sedan? Well, the most expensive versions of the Polestar 2 and Tesla Model 3 are much more affordable than this base i4, but then again, neither of those are wearing a BMW badge.

Okay, here’s where the Cyberster gets impressive.

Its dual-motor set-up combines a 150kW front motor and a 250kW rear motor for a total of 375kW.

Peak torque is a hefty 725Nm.

All that is enough to get you and two tonnes of MG from zero to 100km/h in 3.2 seconds.

Sure it tops out at 208km/h, but the rush of hitting highway speeds is already enough to put your licence at risk.

If there’s one thing BMW knows how to do well, it’s building a sports sedan like no other. And that holds true for its EVs.

Powering this i4 eDrive40 is a single electric motor that produces 250kW/430Nm, which beats the outputs of even the 330i and 430i Gran Coupe.

With drive sent to the rear wheels, the i4 eDrive40 can accelerate from 0-100km/h in just 5.7 seconds, beating out the aforementioned 330i and 430i models.

For those that want a bit more pep, the top-spec M50 grade’s dual-motor set-up punches out 400kW/795Nm for a lightning quick 3.9s 0-100km/h run.

Compared with its petrol-powered 4 Series Gran Coupe counterpart, the i4 certainly puts up respectable figures, while offering more than a performance match for the Polestar 2 and Tesla Model 3.

The MG Cyberster has a 77kWh battery and a claimed efficiency of 19.1kWh/100km.

While that means its claimed driving range of 443km relies on a bit of energy to be recuperated from braking, something you don’t really get on the highway, it actually works in the car’s favour during dynamic driving.

After 264km of driving on a test loop that included some urban but mostly highway and rural driving, the Cyberster’s trip computer displayed a 19.4kWh/100km average consumption.

The battery sat at 27 per cent, with 108km estimated range remaining.

While 443km of total range seems optimistic for a car that’s likely to be driven relatively quickly a lot of the time, the efficiency of the Cyberster held up better than you might have expected.

With an 84kWh battery the official range on this i4 eDrive40 is pegged at 590km when tested to WLTP standards.

However, when fully charged, our test car's range readout was around 390km.

But keep in mind EVs aren’t as effective in cold weather, and the mercury was showing only three degrees on most days during this freezing Irish winter.

Luckily then, BMW has included DC fast-charging capabilities in the i4 as standard, with its 210kW CCS plug able to take the battery from 10 to 80 per cent in around half an hour.

BMW has included DC fast-charging capabilities in the i4 as standard, with its 210kW CCS plug able to take the battery from 10 to 80 per cent in around half an hour.

Using an 11kW AC charger however, will require 8.5 hours for a full charge.

In a week with the car, I averaged an energy consumption rating of 23.4kWh per 100km, almost matching the official figure of 22.2kWh/100km.

My driving included several long-distance trips on the freeway, however, an environment in which an electric vehicle does not excel.

Worth noting the heavier and more energy-hungry M50’s official driving range drops to 510km, but we’re yet to test its real-world figures.

There’s good news and bad news about the Cyberster from behind the wheel.

The good news is it’s quite easy to drive this thing very fast. 

The bad news is it feels like it would be quite easy to get sick of as a day-to-day car, depending on your situation.

The first thing I noticed is the seat feels a bit high, even at its lowest setting. That's likely due to the placement of the battery pack under the floor of of the car.

Following that, if you’re taller than me (I'm five foot 11), it feels like the wrong road surface will have you nudging your head into the roof liner.

That mechanical roof should take about 15 seconds to lower or raise, and that can be done at speeds up to 50km/h.

It could be a symptom of trying to keep 1985kg tied down, but some of Melbourne's highways and arterial roads between 70 and 100km/h had the Cyberster bobbing quite a bit.

But the suspension doesn't let individual bumps intrude too much into the cabin, so it’s not all bad.

Similarly, there’s good and bad when it comes to the steering and braking.

The first being that the steering seems pretty accurate, even though the feedback is a bit numb. 

The braking on the other hand is handled by some pretty capable Brembos up front that pull the heavy roadster up quickly, but don’t always clamp as hard as you might expect when approaching a traffic light at 60km/h.

But stopping’s one thing, and going’s another.

There are three main drive modes, Comfort, Sport, and Super Sport, which mainly alter the acceleration intensity. And they feel well calibrated.

Comfort keeps things calm and cruisy, Sport is plenty for the road, and Super Sport has the potential to draw the attention of the authorities.

There’s good adjustability when it comes to regen braking, and even a decent single-pedal driving mode.

Aside from a couple of particularly heinous roads, the Cyberster held mostly flat when cornering at high speeds, but the potential for its suspension to let its wheels lose their footing might - or should - stop you from pushing the MG too hard.

At high speeds, there’s a bit of wind noise that you really can’t complain about if you’ve just purchased a drop-top, but the noise, vibration and harshness is decent, all things considered.

My only gripe with the interior fit out is that the passenger seat wobbles a little, and rattles on the surface behind it before moving it forward.

It’s impressive what this car can do in terms of performance, it’s just a shame it’s not more playful.

If you came here just to find out whether BMW has succeeded in transplanting its signature sports sedan characteristics into the all-electric i4, the answer is, yes.

The best thing I can say about the i4 is that, aside from the way power is delivered and the lack of engine and exhaust noise, it feels just like a 3 or a 4 Series.

Steering is sharp and responsive, throttle and brake inputs are immediate, making this rear-drive i4 a delight to drive enthusiastically.

The staggered Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tyres and massive brakes obviously help in this regard, and look, it’s not as sharp as the Porsche Taycan, still the sharpest electric vehicle we’ve driven to date, but the driving experience in this i4 is comparable to the excellent 3 Series.

But I’m not in love with the fake sound piped into the cabin when in 'Sport' mode. It sounds weirdly low-rent and I much prefer to accelerate to triple digit speeds in serene, near-silence.

Switch things up to 'Comfort' mode, and the i4 makes for a surprisingly relaxed drive.

The steering gets bit a looser and the adaptive dampers ease off a little, soaking up bumps and road imperfections with minimal affect to occupants.

Pair this with the nearly-silent electric powertrain, and well, our little one in the back seat has fallen asleep on more than one occasion in my time with the car

You can also adjust the level of regenerative braking in the i4 and operate it with one pedal like in the Nissan Leaf and Hyundai Ioniq 5.

This is a more efficient way to drive an EV as it forces you to look ahead and be careful with your throttle inputs.

One-pedal driving might not be for everyone, but it’s nice to have the option there.

BMW’s i4 is yet to be tested by ANCAP or Euro NCAP, so at the time of publication, doesn’t wear an official crash test rating.

Neither does the closely-related 4 Series Gran Coupe, but the 4 Series Coupe, launched in 2019, received a maximum five-star assessment.

It is unclear how much the changes in body style and powertrain affect the safety of occupants, but the i4 comes with long list of advanced safety features.

Specifically, autonomous emergency braking, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, traffic sign recognition, high-beam assist, a surround-view camera, parking assist, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert are all included at no extra cost.

MG has a 10-year/250,000km warranty that’s pretty impressive by industry standards, and the warranty also covers its EVs.

It’s important to note that the convertible roof is one of a few items (including 12-volt batteries and light bulbs) that MG covers for less than 10 years. In the case of the roof it’s only five.

It’s worth closely reading the fine print before you crack into buying a car, regardless.

There are also ten capped-price services which occur every 12 months or 25,000km, ranging from $246 to $785. The average price per service is $503.40.

MG also offers free roadside assist for the period of the warranty.

Like all BMWs sold in Australia, the i4 comes with a three-year/unlimited kilometre warranty with roadside assist over that period.

This falls short of the now-standard five-year assurance periods offered by premium rivals Audi, Genesis, Jaguar, Lexus and Mercedes-Benz.

Scheduled servicing intervals for the i4 are every 20,000km/24 months, at least in overseas materials.

Australian intervals are yet to be confirmed, but BMW is offering service price plans covering four- and six-year periods in 'Basic' and 'Plus' forms.

The Basic plan for four and six years is set at $1240 and $1765 respectively, while the Plus package is $4805 and $5500.