Chery Tiggo 8 PRO MAX vs Renault Symbioz

What's the difference?

This mid-sized seven-seat SUV segment is dominated by just a handful of nameplates, and it’s easy to see how some of them might be under threat by something like the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max.

There are a few areas where it could use some fine-tuning, but these are mainly restricted to being pedantic about the drive experience. There are no dealbreakers here as there often can be for low-cost alternatives, and so long as you’re primarily putting kids in the back seats, this Tiggo is well equipped, comfortable, plush, and surprisingly refined.

With a robust ownership proposition as well, it’s hard to see why you wouldn’t consider one of these if you’re shopping in the seven-seat SUV space - and that's why this could be Chery's shot at the big leagues.

There’s certainly a lot to like about the Renault Symbioz. It may cost more than its direct competition, but it looks, feels and drives with an edge on many of its rivals. And the integration of the Google system will no doubt appeal to some, especially a younger audience which craves the latest tech.

But the extra cost coupled with the image problem French cars have had in Australia - justified or not - will make it a hard sell. The small SUV market is dominated by the big name brands and cut-price models - and the Symbioz is neither. 

Renault Australia has no ambition for this to out-sell the Tiggo 4 Pro and Kona, but even attracting modest sales in such a highly competitive segment will be a hard slog.

If you’re willing to make an unconventional choice, though, you will likely enjoy your time with this little French alternative.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The Tiggo 8 Pro Max just looks like a mid-size SUV. Perhaps if you calculated the average design cues of every mid-size SUV on the market, this would be what you end up with.

Of all the Chinese automakers currently in the market though, the Tiggo range of SUVs are the least controversial. There’s no weird theme to the design, there’s no bizarre light fittings or controversial angles. You could stick a badge on this car from any Korean or Japanese brand and you wouldn’t think twice about it.

It doesn’t say much for innovation, but I think it will very much work in this car's favour. It provides a much more globally appealing look when compared to the controversial design of BYD products, the crazy grilles and badging on GWM products, or the derivative style of the MG range.

For this reason it won’t turn heads at the school drop-off, but that’s perfect for families who want to run incognito and would normally buy a conservative mainstream SUV from Toyota or Mitsubishi.

Inside things get a bit more interesting. The Tiggo 8 has a contemporary design, complete with a high-riding bridge-style console, and the dual-screens are encased in a single housing that spans half the length of the dash.

It’s ambitious too, with generous amounts of soft-touch surfaces and synthetic leather finishes. Clearly, it’s inspired by others in the industry. The dual-screen layout is very Hyundai or Kia via Mercedes, while the Benz influence extends to the wood grain-look plastic inserts and even the little silver finishes covering the speakers up. Rather than a naff knock-off though, the Chery interior genuinely feels its own space.

The only areas that you can see through the facade to a car built-to-a price is in a handful of places. The steering wheel buttons, for instance, feel a bit cheap, and when it comes to those big screens, the resolution isn’t as high as you might expect, and the processing isn’t as fast as it could be, leading to a slightly laggy experience.

Still, the same can be said for many mainstream manufacturers, and at least Chery’s native software has been localised and is easy to navigate. Also, none of this stops the Chery from feeling properly plush on the inside. It was also seemingly pretty well put together, free of rattles, switchgear with too much play, or nasty hollow plastics.

First impressions are good.

The Symbioz effectively replaces the Captur in the local range and brings with it the French firm’s latest design language; which debuted on the recently launched Scenic.

Certainly, compared to some of the more conservative and simple models in the small SUV contest the Renault stands out. It has the look and feel you expect from a European car, on the outside and in the cabin.

One of the reasons for this is Renault Australia is offering seven colours, but only Flame Red is standard rather than the typical white and the other more muted hues cost an additional $900.

In terms of its size and where it fits into Renault’s slightly crowded SUV line-up, the Symbioz is 4412mm long, while the all-electric Scenic E-Tech is 4470mm, the more rugged Duster is 4345mm and the Megane E-Tech is 4200mm. So they’re all quite close, but thanks to unique designs and powertrains (and the fact the Duster isn’t designed to be a Renault), they fit together to form a cohesive line-up for you to choose from.

The interior is also thoughtfully designed, but it needs to compete with user-friendly cars like the Honda CR-V and Nissan X-Trail in this segment.

The front occupants are treated to a reasonably spacious cabin, which for the driver is quite adjustable, although the design of the dash means it sticks out into the front passenger’s knee area. Head and shoulder space is impressive, and everywhere you put your arms or knees there’s a soft-clad finish rather than hard plastic to greet you.

As already mentioned, the software isn’t half bad when it comes to ease-of-use, however the lack of tactile toggles or dials for the climate unit is a bit of a miss. It has its own dedicated set of touch controls below the screen itself, but they provide no tactile feedback, so are a little hard to use while on the move.

Storage is great, with large pockets and bottle-holders in the doors, a further two bottle holders in the centre console, a wireless phone charger, and a neat little set of drive mode buttons and a digital shift lever within easy reach.

The bridge-style console also offers a large pass-through area underneath for the storage of larger items, and there’s a deep centre armrest console box, too.

The second row is quite versatile, offering rail adjustment for the base, so you can maximise the room available to the third row if need be.

Second-row occupants (with the seats set to a decent position for myself at 182cm tall) have plenty of knee room and plenty of headroom, and the doors open nice and wide for the loading of objects or people.

Storage includes large pockets on the backs of the front seats, a bottle holder in each door, and a further two in the drop-down armrest. There is a set of adjustable air vents on the back of the centre console, with both a USB-A and USB-C port for power delivery.

The third row is a bit more challenging. I had to contort myself to get in with the second row seat either slid forward or folded flat. Once I was in there, I was surprised to find I fit, but only just.

My knees were hard up against the seat in front, while my head was touching the roof. Mercifully, I had enough room to slide my feet under the seat in front, otherwise it would’ve been too tight. It’s passable for adults then, but only in a pinch, and you wouldn’t want to be back there for long. No problem if you’re just putting kids back there though.

The third row gets air vents on either side with an independent fan speed controller on the mid-grade Elite and top-spec Ultimate, and there’s a useful storage tray, and small bottle holder on each side. You don’t get USB ports, but there’s a 12 volt outlet available just behind the rear seats in the boot.

On the topic of the boot, it is not as large as I was hoping, but then neither is the car itself.

The boot measures 479 litres with the second-row up, or just 117-litres with all seven seats deployed. It’s smaller than some mid-size rivals, but not enough for it to be a dealbreaker. We’ll get it back for a longer test to see what does and does not fit.

The floor is quite high to facilitate those fold-flat rear seats, and there’s a small under-floor storage tray where you can hide the retractable luggage cover on the Urban and Elite variants. Unfortunately the Ultimate gets a subwoofer here.

All variants get a space-saver spare wheel mounted outside underneath the car, so at least you don’t need to deal with a tyre repair kit.

There are two elements that really stand out inside the Symbioz when it comes to practicality and technology, and how they are integrated.

The first element is that Renault has partnered with Google and this new model features the latest Google Automotive Services (GAS) which includes integrated Google Maps as well as access to the Google Play Store for downloading apps, but does so much more. Google Assistant is offered by default but you can also upgrade (via an over-the-air update) to Gemini, the tech giant’s artificial intelligence (AI).

This means with a simple ‘Hey Google’ voice command you can search for not only an address but anything you might need when you’re behind the wheel. So, if you are driving and want to stop for a coffee, you can ask Google Assistant or Gemini to find you a suitable spot to stop.

We were able to sample both systems and there is a clear difference between the two, with Gemini able to provide more detailed answers. But you have the freedom to choose if you want AI in your car or not, and can simply decline to update and stick with Assistant.

The second stand out feature is the amount of physical switchgear used throughout. Despite the switch to Google, Renault has stuck with physical controls for all the key functions - climate control, stereo, etc - which adds to the cost but makes for a much easier and safer driving experience.

While it may be a small SUV in size, Renault’s designers have created a surprisingly spacious and well-considered interior.

Up the front there are plenty of small item storage spaces, with an emphasis on small. But what they lack in size they make up for in quantity. There is a small ledge ahead of the stubby gear selector, with the wireless charging pad hidden underneath it. There are two cupholders and a small lidded console box as well, plus small door pockets.

In terms of space for people, up front the seats are comfortable and roomy, while in the rear the back of the driver and passenger seats have been heavily sculpted out to create a good amount of kneeroom.

As for the boot, Renault claims it is one of the best in the segment thanks to the back seats being on a slider, which allows you to trade-off rear passenger space for more cargo capacity.  It means the mild hybrid has between 563-695L depending on the rear seat position, while the full hybrid is smaller, between 460-592L; with the difference attributed to the different position of the spare tyre.

The fact both models include a temporary spare tyre is notable in itself, as it’s something increasingly rare in this segment and very much a welcome addition in Australian conditions.

There are three variants of Symbioz available from launch, with two different powertrains to choose from - the Techno with a mild hybrid and conventional hybrid available in either the Techno or Esprit Alpine trim.

The Techno mild hybrid kicks off the range at $36,990, plus on-road costs, then the Techno hybrid starts at $42,990 and the Esprit Alpine hybrid caps the line-up at $45,990.

That positions the Symbioz roughly $5000 more than its main rivals in the small SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and Toyota Corolla Cross, which both start at around $37,000 for their entry-level full hybrids.

However, that means it is at the more premium end of the market, well above the likes of the Chery Tiggo 4 Pro, Jaecoo J5 and MG ZS, which all start well below $30,000.

The most direct rivals to the Symbioz are the slightly more premium options, such as the Honda HR-V (from $32,990) and Mazda CX-30 (from $34,360), so against those the price comparison is better.

They come fairly well-equipped for the asking price, featuring 18-inch alloy wheels for the Techno models and 19-inch rims for Esprit Alpine, plus a wireless smartphone charger, heated steering wheel, automatic climate control and auto headlights. There’s also a 10.25-inch digital driver display and 10.4-inch central multimedia touchscreen connected to a six-speaker sound system, with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto included, as well as Google Automotive Services.

The Esprit Alpine adds a nine-speaker Harman Kardon sound system, performance seats that are heated and electronically adjustable, red white and blue stitching on the steering wheel plus a power tailgate and chrome exterior trim.

There is only one engine option in the Tiggo 8 Pro Max range, a 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol unit that produces 180kW/375Nm.

No matter which variant you choose, it’s also mated to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission. The Urban and Elite variants are front-wheel drive, while the Ultimate scores a Borg-Warner-sourced all-wheel-drive system with additional off-road drive modes.

The outputs are more than competitive with a lot of rivals, but there’s no fuel-saving hybrid option in the line-up just yet. It’s something Chery wants to add in the future.

Especially for Australia, the folks at Chery also made sure to get the Tiggo 8 Pro Max certified to tow. It can do that at up to 1300kg braked, or 750kg unbraked.

As mentioned earlier, Renault is offering two powertrains - a mild hybrid and a conventional hybrid. Remarkably, despite this being 2026, this is the first time Renault has ever offered a hybrid powertrain in Australia.

It’s a decent hybrid option too, making a respectable 116kW and 265Nm from its 1.8-litre four-cylinder petrol engine and electric motor.

Meanwhile, the mild hybrid features a 1.3-litre four-cylinder petrol engine and makes a more modest 104kW and 245Nm.

The 2.0-litre turbo engine has an official/combined consumption rating of 8.1L/100km for the front-wheel drive variants, or 8.7L/100km for the all-wheel drive Ultimate.

On our drive route for the day which took place on curvy country roads and expressways, my Ultimate all-wheel-drive test example produced a figure of 9.5L/100km which seems reasonable.

Unfortunately the engine also requires mid-shelf 95RON unleaded fuel, so this will push your running costs up slightly.

The Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a 57-litre fuel tank, indicating an estimated maximum cruising range of 703km for FWD variants.

Renault Australia management was keen to push the convenience of a traditional hybrid, which requires no outside charging and is therefore easier to use - even if that means it can’t match the efficiency of a plug-in hybrid.

According to the company, the so-called ‘multimodal hybrid gearbox’ is the key to its efficiency. On paper it’s a four-speed automatic, but it’s integrated with the engine, motor, starter and generator, which means the engine and electric motor can both drive the front-wheels, while also helping the Symbioz return a claimed 4.7L/100km.

The battery is quite small at just 1.4kWh battery, but there is an ‘E-Save’ button that allows you to prioritise the petrol engine if you want to hold on the silent power for later.

With a 48-litre fuel tank and the 4.7L return, the Symbioz has a theoretical driving range of more than 1000km on a single fill.

As for the mild hybrid, it gets a more conventional seven-speed dual-clutch transmission and has a claimed fuel economy rating of 6.4L/100km. 

It has the same fuel tank, so its theoretical range is 750km, which is still a good return but obviously not as attention grabbing as the full hybrid.

Cars from Chinese brands often fall short of expectations when it comes to the drive experience, but the Tiggo 8 Pro Max moves everything in the right direction, and importantly it doesn’t add any deal-breaking characteristics along the way.

Visibility is great out of the cabin, with large windows all-round. The wing mirrors are great, but the centre rear-vision mirror is a quirky piece with a wide viewing angle. In a way this is great for parents, because with one glance you can see both out the rear of the vehicle and the rear seats to keep an eye on kids, but it does mess with your depth perception a bit.

On multiple occasions I felt like the car behind was tailgating, only to peer in the side mirrors to find that it was actually quite far back. Odd!

The steering is very light, and a bit disconnected as a result. While this sounds like a negative, I actually think suburban buyers who often negotiate with shopping centre parking lots, apartment towers, and school drop-offs will love it. It makes a big SUV feel really easy to steer and position.

Sure, it feels a bit doughy out on the open road, meaning it's hardly a confident corner-carver, but that’s not really the point of this car.

The engine on the other hand has loads of poke. Power of 180kW sounds like a lot because it is (once upon a time not so long ago this was well into V6 territory) and actually for the front-wheel-drive versions it might be a little bit too much power. It will readily spin the front wheels with slightly too much throttle input, which brings us nicely to the dual-clutch automatic which is responsible for communicating that power to the ground.

Dual clutches rightly raise a bit of a red flag for some because they can be particularly jerky from a standstill and have some pretty questionable gear shifts once you’re rolling. For the most part though, the Tiggo 8’s dual-clutch unit is pretty good. The brand stressed that it had done significant software tuning to this transmission to try to iron out nasty characteristics, and while it's still occasionally caught off-guard, I’ve certainly driven worse. It will occasionally produce a bucking feeling rather than a full second of lag like some rivals, but its enthusiasm to deliver power to the ground quickly gives the front-drive versions that slightly skittish feel.

It is one of those rare occasions when it’s worth splashing for the all-wheel drive. I found the Ultimate to be much more sure-footed and confident on the road, able to handle the engine’s relatively mountainous torque with ease.

On the open road I was impressed by the Tiggo 8’s level of refinement. The amount of sound entering the cabin in both variants was low, with minimal tyre roar or wind noise. Thuds from the suspension and roar from the engine under load were also pleasingly distant, even at freeway speeds.

When it comes to the ride it’s built to a certain cadence. It’s soft and comfortable, matching the semi-luxurious cabin feel nicely, but it can be a bit springy and lose a bit of body control over undulations and corrugations. Again, it’s not exactly an athlete, but then for most people, it won’t have to be.

Importantly, it filters out sharper bumps like potholes, road imperfections, and speed bumps with relative ease. It’s even better in the 2WD versions thanks to larger tyres and smaller alloy wheels.

Mercifully, the active safety systems don’t intrude on the driving experience either. Chery has apparently learned some hard lessons after the feedback it received on the overbearing lane assist equipment on the smaller Omoda 5, and applied those learnings here in the Tiggo 8.

The lane systems are still there, but they only intervene when they really have to, while warning chimes from things like the traffic sign recognition, blind spot monitoring, and driver attention alert are, at worst, background. It’s a good thing too because of all the systems, the driver attention alert is the one that triggers most often as you look away from the road to adjust the touch-based climate systems.

Where does that leave us? Actually pretty impressed. The Tiggo 8 Pro Max might not have the balancing act between ride quality and performance quite as well tuned as some of its Japanese and Korean rivals, but this is a comfortable, quiet, and refined SUV that, importantly, feels very normal. There’s no deal-breaking safety bugs, or a terrible transmission or frustrating software that takes away from the experience. Chery is learning, and it’s learning fast.

If you’re going to pay a premium for your non-conformist small SUV, one of the perks should be an above-average driving experience and thankfully the Symbioz delivers in this regard.

It’s not that it channels the iconic Renault Sport hot hatches of the past, or even sets a new dynamic benchmark for the class, but amid the sea of more-affordable models the Symbioz feels more composed on the road.

It’s responsive to your inputs as the driver and inspires confidence that not all of its rivals do. A big part of that is likely down to the tyres, with Renault avoiding the trap of cheaper, less impressive rubber that detracts from some of its competitors and instead offer Continental tyres on the Techno and Michelin rubber on the Esprit Alpine.

The ride is firmer than average, which helps with the responsiveness but means you can feel bumps in the road a bit more sharply than some, although it’s never uncomfortable.

It’s worth noting that we did see a trip computer fuel economy figure below the claimed 4.7L/100km, but an extended stretch of our drive was on motorways, which obviously helps keep that number down.

There is some mixed news on the safety front with the Symbioz. Starting with the positives, it has all the modern safety systems you should expect, including driver attention monitoring, autonomous emergency braking and lane keeping assist. And generally those systems work pretty well and feel like they have been properly calibrated, certainly better than many small SUV rivals.

But if you really don’t like those systems, Renault has included a button labelled ‘Perso’ which allows you to customise the safety settings you want on or off at the press of that single button. So even though they are required to default to on whenever the car turns on, it doesn’t require navigating the menu to turn them off.

However, the bad news on the safety front is the Symbioz has not been rated by ANCAP but has a four-star crash test score from Euro NCAP. This was from a 2024 test, when the Symbioz went on sale in Europe, and was a result of missing points in several areas, notably some specific occupant protection (the driver’s chest protection was rated as “weak”) with no centre airbag or knee airbags for the driver or front passenger.

While short of the top score from the safety body, it is important to put the result into context and four stars does not mean the Symbioz should be considered unsafe in any way.

Chery offers its line-up with seven years and unlimited kilometres of warranty, seven-years of capped-price servicing, and seven years of roadside assist.

The roadside assist is topped up on a 12 monthly basis so long as you service with Chery. At the time of writing, Chery was yet to provide costings for its capped-price servicing program, but if it follows the same scheme as the Omoda 5 and Tiggo 7, it will be competitive.

The Symbioz is covered by Renault’s standard five-year/unlimited km warranty, which was fine a few years ago but when more affordable models are offering seven years and longer, it feels like a missed opportunity for the French firm.

The company offers ‘Assured Servicing Pricing’ which covers the first five years or 150,000km - whichever comes first. Intervals are every 12 months/30,000km and cost $2715 for the hybrid and $2695 for the mild hybrid.

Renault, which is looked after by an independent distributor in Australia, has 52 dealerships spread across the country.