BYD Sealion 6 vs Mazda CX-60

What's the difference?

So, should Toyota, Tesla, Hyundai and others be worried about the arrival of the Sealion 6 and BYD’s new DMi powertrains? Yes, but not because it represents any major breakthrough in technology or dynamic prowess. 

Instead, the strength of the Sealion 6 is how average it is. It may not be the obvious class-leader in any particular area, but it does a good job in almost every measurable aspect and doesn’t possess any major flaws.

Yes, there are still questions about the long-term dependability of BYDs but that’s a risk any new owner will need to accept. But the very sharp pricing should tempt plenty of buyers to take that chance and continue BYD’s steady upwards trajectory in the Australian market.

Have no doubts. The MY25 version of the CX-60 is the SUV that Mazda should have launched in Australia in 2023.

It fulfils the promise of its sophisticated specification, builds on the extensive dynamic abilities of previous models, and now provides a compelling – and unique – choice for medium-SUV buyers who do not need an extended seven-seater.

It may still looks a bit daggy from some angles outside, and we’d like a little bit less suspension noise on the inside, but the CX-60 should now be on Australian family-car shortlists.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

This is one area where BYD has a mixed record. Not to be unkind or create an international incident, but the Chinese car industry has a history of not being totally original with all of its automotive designs.

However, things are improving and the Sealion 6 is a good example of the Chinese industry learning to develop its own style. While there are some subtle hints from European models, overall it’s a smart-looking mid-size SUV with some character to it - rather than being a bland imitation of something else.

One area where the Sealion is a cut above its competition is its size, being longer than and wider than the RAV4, Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X-Trail.

If you’re searching for something new in the looks department for the CX-60, you won’t find it, since this is essentially the same car as last year’s model from the outside. Except there’s a new beige colour option.

Which means the same long-bonnet/cab-backward silhouette remains, along with the corporate wing-motif grille, hunched-over styling (that looks awkward from some angles) and short rear overhangs.

Still, the overall effect remains modern, clean and distinct from the nearly-identical and very closely-related CX-70, CX-80 and CX-90 further up the Mazda food chain.

Note that the CX-60 is usefully larger than the CX-5, with the former coming in at 4740mm long, 1890mm wide, 1675mm tall and 2870mm in wheelbase length, compared to the latter’s 4575mm, 1845mm, 1680mm and 2700mm dimensions respectively.

Which, of course, elevates it from an interior point of view.

That external size translates to a roomy cabin, which also has some flair to the design but thankfully a bit more restrained than the smaller Atto 3 - which is a bit over-the-top in this reviewer’s opinion. 

The element that sticks out immediately is the large central touchscreen which, like other models in the range, can rotate either vertical or horizontal, depending on your preference.

I don’t understand the point of this, because when rotated vertically it impacts your forward vision and can interfere with the air conditioning vents; and I can’t even see it with my polarised sunglasses.

It simply makes more sense horizontally, but I guess all carmakers are looking for catchy gimmicks these days. But while it may seem like a cool party trick it remains somewhat confusing to me, like one more thing to go wrong. But maybe I’m just getting old and grumpy.

What I do like and think is a great idea is double smartphone charging pads in the centre console. And overall the design of the cabin feels well thought out and has plenty of useful storage areas.

The seats are fine, a little flat and the fixed headrests are irritating, but overall they’re soft and supportive enough.

The key in the second row seating is the amount of space, with the extra length of the Sealion 6 compared to its rivals showing up with more knee room in the back for families with growing teenagers or those who need to carry their adult friends.

There’s also a pair of USB ports in the back too, so everyone can keep their electronics charged.

The boot is a good size, measuring 425 litres on paper, and has a nice long and wide floor. But some of that space is thanks to the lack of a spare - so that counts against it in my book.

Like the exterior, the changes for the MY25 CX-60 are pretty much under the skin, with improved noise/vibration and harshness-quelling measures to quieten things down more.

And an exhaust-sound enhancer through the audio system to liven things up if you desire.

Representing the aforementioned $10K saving over the previous entry-level Evolve, the Pure does possess less opulent trim and (nice) cloth seat fabrics, but otherwise the CX-60 does present a larger-than-usual cabin environment compared to smaller medium-sized SUVs.

But fans of big, showy screens may be underwhelmed.

The dash is elegant but somewhat old-fashioned, especially compared to, say, the latest BMW X3’s dazzling displays. It feels like a hangover from last decade’s CX-9.

Yet there’s no denying how satisfyingly easy and logical most of it is, from the super-clear, electronic instrumentation to the simple and effective climate control layout, while the iDrive-style rotary controller means less time with eyes off the road. Safe, intuitive ergonomics. Thank you, Mazda.

Additionally, there’s a quality solidness to the fit and finish that elevates the social-climbing Mazda beyond what a CX-5 could achieve.

All the essentials are also well thought out, from storage and vision out to ventilation and, not least of all, space and seat support, especially when sat on over long distances.

That also carries over to the expansive back-seat environment, with air vents, USB ports, lighting, cupholders and grab handles. The CX-60 is an SUV that a family could grow into without it feeling excessive.

Is this ‘big-medium’ or ‘small-large’ sized?

From the boot’s perspective, either fits, and is one of the reasons why you might consider stepping up to a CX-60. The floor is low, wide, flat and easy to load, as well as beautifully finished.

The 40/20/40 split fold backrests can be folded remotely via Mazda’s Karakuri function, boosting capacity from 477 litres (VDA) to 1726L, while the in-line six-cylinder models have a space-saver spare wheel underneath, leaving PHEV owners with an inadequate tyre repair kit.

Starting from $50,240 (all prices are before on-road costs) for the Pure grade in G40e six-cylinder turbo-petrol-powered guise that should account for nearly half of all sales, this is the new base grade.

It has lost some items compared to the previous entry-level Evolve, but remains a decently-equipped proposition.

Included are LED headlights with auto high beams, keyless entry/start, dual-zone climate control, cloth trim, a 10.25-inch display/touchscreen, a 360-degree view camera, front/rear parking sensors, satellite navigation, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, DAB+ digital radio, eight-speaker audio, vehicle-exit warning, folding/heated exterior mirrors and 18-inch alloy wheels.

There’s also a decent level of advanced driver-assist safety technology like autonomous emergency braking, lane-support systems and adaptive cruise control. More on those later.

Moving up to the Evolve from $55,240 scores you a larger touchscreen (12.3-inches), ground-view monitor, artificial leather trim, a wireless charger, powered tailgate and a few extra safety features like front-cross traffic alert and a driver monitor, while the new Touring grade from $58,240 gains leather trim and heated/powered front seats with driver’s side memory.

Climbing up to the GT from $64,240 adds adaptive LED headlights, panoramic sunroof, Bose 12-speaker audio upgrade, a powered/heated steering wheel, hands-free tailgate operation, heated rear seats, glossier trim and 20-inch alloys, while the Azami from $68,440 includes Nappa leather, glitzier finishes, vented front seats and more.

Speaking of more, $2000 extra buys you a white interior with unique woven textiles (Azami Takumi pack) or a sportier tan colour edition (Azami SP pack).

Want more economy? Diesel adds another $2000 while going for the PHEV powertrain ups that by a whopping $11,050 across all grades. We’re grateful for the choice, Mazda.

These certainly sound expensive for a mid-sized SUV from Japan, but the CX-60 is considerably larger and roomier than, say, a CX-5 or Toyota RAV4, and possesses a level of sophisticated engineering that puts it in Audi Q5, BMW X3, Lexus NX, Mercedes-Benz GLC and Volvo XC60 territory – and the least-expensive of these kicks off from upwards of $20,000 more, depending on spec.

As a sub-luxury premium proposition, then, the CX-60 lives in a sort of no-man’s land. Yet its styling certainly reveals where Mazda’s aspirations lie.

While BYD has made its name in Australia as an all-electric brand it has always referred to itself as a 'new energy' company, and the Sealion 6 (and upcoming Shark ute) are why.

That’s because these feature BYD’s new 'Dual-Mode Intelligence' (DMi) powetrain - a hybrid system to you and me.

As mentioned above, the biggest difference between the Dynamic and Premium models is the powertrain, with two reasonably different systems.

The Dynamic is powered by a 78kW/135Nm 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine, paired with a 145kW/300Nm electric motor - making for a combined system output of 160kW/300Nm. Notably, this powertrain only drives the front wheels.

In contrast, the Premium has an all-wheel drive set-up, combining a turbocharged version of the petrol engine (good for 96kW/220Nm) with a pair of electric motors, one on the front axle and one on the rear to produce a combined output of 238kW and 550Nm.

Both models get the same 18.3kWh ‘Blade’ battery, which is BYD’s proprietary technology underpinning all of its models and is attracting attention from other brands.

For reference, the Outlander PHEV has a 20kWh battery, Nissan’s X-Trail e-Power has a 2.1kWh battery, while the more conventional RAV4 Hybrid has just a 6.5Ah battery.

For now, the base engine is the 209kW/450Nm G40e, a 3.3-litre turbo-petrol ‘six’ delivering the sort of healthy power figures that late-model Commodore and Falcon buyers would appreciate.

There’s also the 187kW/550Nm D50e turbo-diesel version, for extra pulling power and economy, and we’re getting into premium Euro territory here, because both offer a 48-volt, mild-hybrid system, employing a small electric motor located behind the engine to boost torque yet cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

Mazda says new motor control and clutch slip control software facilitates “…smoother transitions as the electric motor is activated and deactivated”. We hope so!

Last but not least, there’s the 241kW/500Nm P50e plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrain, combining the familiar 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a larger, 129kW electric motor powered by a 17.8kWh Lithium ion battery. The latter allows up to 76km of pure-electric driving, and can be recharged either by regenerative braking when driving or plugged into a Type 2 port.

All three engines use a revised eight-speed, wet multi-plate-clutch automatic transmission, still driving the rear or, as traction and/or performance needs arise, all four wheels.

Yep, this is essentially a rear-drive-biased family SUV, with a sophisticated double wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up to keep everything in line.

So, what’s changed underneath compared to last year’s CX-60?

Among the modifications are stiffer dampers and softer rear springs to address ride-comfort issues with the old car; relocated front knuckle mounts; altered rear axle bushes and the removal of the rear anti-roll bar for more stable control; shorter rear bump stops for greater suspension travel; an extra joint in the steering column quells vibrations while updated software improves steering feel and electronic stability control operation. The goal is for noticeably smoother, comfier and more linear dynamics. 

Result? To find out how much better or worse Mazda’s latest mid-sized SUV is, we drove the it in a variety of conditions, from the push-and-shove of Melbourne’s bumper-to-bumper peak-hour traffic, to a series of demanding emergency-swerve and multi-speed ride and handling test manoeuvres at the legendary Lang Lang proving ground that shaped so many of our iconic Holdens.

More on that a bit later on.

There are multiple modes to drive it in, including electric only, with the Dynamic able to go up to 92km on a single charge, while the Premium manages a claimed 81km.

However, it's important to note these are the NEDC standards and not the more real-world like WLTP,  so you may not achieve those in practice.

The claimed fuel consumption is an impressive 1.1L/100km for the Dynamic and 1.4L/100km for the Premium although again achieving those in the real world will take some effort.

With a 60-litre fuel tank BYD claims the Dynamic has a driving range of just over 1000km, while the Premium can manage around 960km.

It's also worth noting the Sealion 6 comes equipped with vehicle-to-load charging which means you can draw power from the batteries to run small electronic devices if you need to.

It’s a bonus feature that may or may not be of use, but is one of those things that may come in handy one day to get you through a camping trip or a BBQ at the park.

One area where the Mazda did not need fixing is in its fuel economy.

All of the CX-60’s powertrains are rated at Euro 5.

Officially, the G40e 3.3-litre petrol averages 7.4L/100km, on the combined cycle, and emits 174 grams per kilometre of CO2. Urban and Extra Urban numbers are 9.9L/100km and 6.0L/100km.

Fitted with a 58L petrol tank, expect an average range of around 780km. And it will run on standard 91 RON unleaded petrol to boot.

Moving on to the D50e 3.3L diesel, it manages an impressive 5.0L/100km, for a CO2 figure of 132g/km, resulting in a range average of about 1160km. Its Urban/Extra Urban figures are 5.5/4.7L/100km respectively.

And, finally, there’s the P50e 2.5L PHEV, offering a theoretical 2.1L/100km, for a CO2 figure of just 49g/km, for an unlikely range average of 2380km from its 50L tank, though on 95 RON premium unleaded brew.

Out in the real world, and mostly driven harder than a typical owner might, the trip computer in the PHEV showed low sevens, while the diesel displayed mid-eights and the petrol high nines, which aren’t too bad at all.

We drove the Sealion 6 Dynamic and despite having the less powerful powertrain it feels good on the road. The DMi system offers good performance, with quiet acceleration off the mark and a good integration between the petrol engine and electric motors. We haven’t driven the Premium yet, so we can’t make any comment on how different it feels.

It’s hard to make a definitive call on the Sealion PHEV powertrain because, like every plug-in hybrid, its greatest strength relies on how the owner operates it.

If you don’t charge the battery every day or so, you’ll just end up lugging around a battery and electric motor for little benefit. However, if you do keep the battery topped up, you can do most of your urban commuting without needing to turn the petrol engine on, which should result in some very low fuel consumption figures.

The company clearly knows this, which is why BYD Australia is offering a complimentary home charger to the first 3000 customers who order a Sealion 6.

Not only will that encourage sales but it will also help owners become evangelists for PHEVs in the future, because they’ll have the best possible experience.

So, a large part of its strength or weakness rests on the owner’s behaviour and that’s something we can’t assess.

As for the rest of the driving experience, the ride comfort is fine. It can’t match the class-leaders for compliance or dynamics, but the Sealion feels pleasant to drive around the urban environment and on the freeway at speed.

Biggest criticism is the steering is very, very light. While that makes parking easier, it feels so light you get very little feedback from the front wheels so it can feel vague at times.

Overall the driving experience is best described as fine. It doesn’t have any major vices but neither does it set any new benchmarks. 

This is the acid test. Does the CX-60 drive like a Mazda should?

In the engine department, definitely.

The changes that Mazda has made to the transmission calibration means that it no longer hunts indecisively between ratios like it used to, and that results in smoother shifts as well as a more relaxed driving experience.

And that's across the range, whether we're talking about the six-cylinder diesel or petrol, or four-pot plug-in hybrid. And the latter brings the biggest surprise, because the changes made to the gearbox have resulted in a much more pleasant car around town, with no more shunting or jerky movements to contend with.

And then there's the ride, which is palpably softer than before. The suspension is significantly more pliable and comfortable as a consequence, offering better bump absorption, improved control at speed and basically just a more refined experience. We tried several of the Lang Lang Proving Ground’s rough-road tests, which the CX-60 sailed over without any of the hard jarring of the previous model, which Mazda helpfully provided for back-to-back assessments.

So, how does all that translate in everyday driving?

Well, the latest CX-60 is way more comfortable to ride in across the board, it handles and corners with greater control and linearity, seems quieter and it's just a suppler experience overall.

As there was so much that was good with the original CX-60 anyway, including muscular performance from the inline six-cylinder turbos, impressive high-speed stability and exceptional body control through fast turns, the modifications for 2025 do much to elevate an already good thing.

So, it's a win-win situation. If you are in the market for a sub-premium, mid-sized SUV with performance and space, as well as newfound comfort and sophistication, you can do a lot worse than check out the CX-60. It is that much better than before.

Thankfully, the CX-60 isn’t frugal on safety, scoring a five-star ANCAP crash-test rating back in 2022.

An extensive suite of driver-assist tech is standard, and it’s all nicely tuned for Australian roads, unlike some Chinese vehicles we’ve tested and that’s an important distinction.

These include autonomous emergency braking (AEB) for cyclists, pedestrians and in back-over situations, blind-spot monitoring, vehicle exit warning, lane-departure, lane-assist and emergency lane-keep tech, driver attention alert, forward obstruction warning, rear cross-traffic alert, turn-across traffic and adaptive cruise control tech with full stop/go.

However, front cross-traffic alert, 'Cruising/Traffic Support' (that assists drivers in slow-moving traffic with automatic accelerator, brake and steering control to maintain a safe distance from the vehicle ahead) and see-through view front camera are not in the Pure. Adaptive LED headlights and drowsy driver alert only start from GT up, while emergency brake assist is for the Azami grade only.

All CX-60s include front and rear parking sensors, surround-view cameras, tyre pressure monitors and traffic sign recognition.

The AEB for vulnerable road users works between 10km/h and 80km/h, and the AEB car-to-car operates between 4km/h and 160km/h.

Likewise, the extensive lane-support systems work between 55km/h and 195km/h.

There are also eight airbags, as well as a trio of child-seat restraining top-tether points fitted, along with two ISOFIX latches in the rear outboard seats.

BYD is a small company but has partnered with mycar service centres to make maintaining your Sealion 6 easier. The Sealion is covered by BYD's six-year/150,000km warranty as well as its 10-year capped price servicing plan.

Service intervals are every 12 months/20,000km and prices range from $265 up to $1184 for the major eight year/160,000km tune up. Over the first five years, in keeping with most of its rivals, you’ll be paying $1648.

As I’ve written in previous BYD reviews, the biggest question mark hanging over the brand is arguably its long-term prospects. Quite simply, the brand is still too new to know how well it will perform on the used car market.

We also can’t tell you how it will hold up from a reliability point-of-view. We’re not suggesting there’s any doubt over its quality, but each car brand must prove itself reliable and dependable over time, and BYD hasn’t had that time yet.

Mazda could also do a bit better with its warranty nowadays, since its five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance is decidedly average.

Service intervals are at 12 months or every 15,000km, while a fixed-price service scheme is available, starting from $463 per service depending on powertrain. That’s for the petrol. The diesels start from $500 while the PHEVs commence from $435.