Mitsubishi Triton vs Ford Transit Custom

What's the difference?

The sixth-generation Triton is bigger, stronger, more powerful and more capable. By our measure, it’s the best one yet. It now matches the segment leaders on towing and payload ratings and, despite price increases, still represents compelling value for a high-quality Japanese ute. Mitsubishi has made choosing a dual cab ute from an already quality field even harder.

The Sport, like all Transit Customs we’ve tested, is a capable one-tonner and all-around workhorse even though it's not quite as sporty these days due to engine revisions. With an all-new Transit Custom range due later this year, we’re not sure if a Sport will be part of the model mix. So, if you like the look of this rebel, we’re sure run-out deals will soon be available.

New exterior styling features bold body contouring with a distinctive grille/headlight design. It’s also larger in key dimensions including body length (up 15mm), body width (up 50mm) and load tub length (up 35mm) for improved cabin space, comfort and load capacity.

The new body is mounted on a redesigned chassis-frame with significant gains in strength and torsional rigidity.

Track width is unchanged but there’s a substantial 130mm increase in wheelbase to 3130mm, which is longer than the HiLux (3085mm) and closer to the Ranger (3220mm) with noticeable improvements in ride quality and handling stability.

Off-road credentials include 228mm of ground clearance and 30.4 degrees approach/23.4 degrees ramp break-over/22.8 degrees departure angles.

The suspension tune for Australian-delivered Tritons comprises a unique front shock absorber/spring combination. The rear suspension has also been revised with larger shocks and lighter, more efficient leaf-springs to reduce unsprung weight for enhanced ride and handling.

Work-focused GLX models are equipped with ‘heavy-duty’ rear suspension, while the more luxurious GLS/GSR have softer-riding ‘standard’ rear suspension.

Another Triton first is a switch to electric power steering, for increased efficiency with lower steering effort. By contrast, Mitsubishi sticks with rear drum brakes, which with greater friction surface area than disc brakes can provide more ‘bite’ when parking with heavy loads or holding firm on hills when off-roading.

New GLS interior styling has a tasteful mix of contrasting surfaces, textured fabric seat-facings and white stitching, but also embraces traditional features like analogue speedo/tacho and a manual handbrake lever.

The wider body provides a noticeable increase in front shoulder room and the driver’s hip point has been raised, resulting in a more upright driving position with improved lower back support.

There are assist-handles on the A and B pillars to climb aboard and there’s easy access to the more spacious rear seat. Even big fellas like me (186cm) have about 60mm of head clearance and 40mm of knee clearance when sitting behind the driver’s seat in my position.

There are still no air-vents in the centre console for rear passengers, as Mitsubishi prefers to stick with its roof-mounted air circulator which draws in cooled or heated air from the front of the cabin and shares it with rear passengers (with their own fan-speed control) through slimline roof-vents.

The Sport enhances the purposeful styling of the Transit Custom, which, with its wedge-shaped character lines, trapezoidal grille and swept-back headlights, is still arguably Australia’s best-looking commercial van after more than a decade in local showrooms.

Although some may find the twin racing stripes too in-ya-face, the overall effect of the Sport’s unique body enhancements and larger 17-inch alloys with lower profile tyres is one of cheeky rebellion against commercial van conservatism.

Only the Transit Custom’s handsome lines could get away with this. Can you imagine how a HiAce would respond to this treatment?

Even so, the Sport retains the excellent design features that make it such a good workhorse, including the sealed steel bulkhead that separates the cargo bay and cabin. This not only serves as a robust cargo barrier but also insulates the cabin from cargo bay noise, which in some commercial vans without a bulkhead can be unbearable at highway speeds.

Its front-wheel drive chassis platform has MacPherson strut front suspension, leaf-spring beam axle rear suspension, four-wheel disc brakes, power-assisted rack and pinion steering and a compact 2933mm wheelbase that provides a competitive 11.8-metre turning circle.

Our test vehicle is fitted with the standard LHS sliding load-door and twin rear barn-doors, but optional body configurations include a window in the LHS sliding load-door, dual side load-doors with or without windows and a rear swing-up tailgate.

With its 2125kg kerb weight and 3200kg GVM, our test vehicle has a sizeable 1075kg payload rating, so it’s a genuine one-tonner like all models in the new Triton range.

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer, which is a significant 400kg increase over the previous generation and finally puts the Triton on par with segment leaders.

However, to avoid exceeding its 6250kg GCM (how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time), towing that weight would require a 450kg reduction in vehicle payload to 625kg.

Or you could reduce the trailer limit by the same amount (from 3500kg to 3050kg) and retain the Triton’s peak 1075kg payload. This combination would be ample for most work and recreational requirements, as few (if any) owners of utes this size need to tow 3500kg anyway.

The load tub’s internal dimensions are almost square, being 1555mm long and 1545mm wide with a 525mm depth. There’s also 1135mm between the rear wheel-housings, so it can take a Euro pallet.

There are fixed load-anchorage points front and rear and the GLS tub is protected by a slide-in liner.

Cabin storage for driver and front passenger includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door, an overhead glasses holder and upper and lower gloveboxes. The centre console has two small-bottle/cupholders plus a box at the rear with padded lid that doubles as a comfortable elbow rest.

Rear passengers get a bottle-holder in each door, large pockets on each front-seat backrest and two cupholders in the bench seat’s fold-down centre armrest. There’s also a 12-volt socket plus USB-A and USB-C ports in the rear of the centre console.

Like the previous Triton, there are no rear underfloor storage compartments and the seat’s base cushion is fixed, so you can’t swing it up and store in a vertical position, like numerous rivals, if more internal load space is required.

With its 2064kg kerb weight and 3100kg GVM, the Sport offers a one-tonne-plus payload rating of 1036kg.

Handily, up to 130kg of that can be carried on the smartest of roof storage systems, comprising a trio of sturdy hinged racks which lie flat against the roof when not in use but can be quickly swung up and locked into vertical positions for load carrying.

It’s also rated to tow up to 1600kg of braked trailer. However, to do that without exceeding the 4100kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) would require a sizeable and impractical 600kg reduction in payload from 1036kg to only 436kg.

More than half of that 436kg could be used up by the weight of three big crew members alone before you could think about loading anything in the cargo bay.

So, from practical experience, we reckon it’s best to base tow ratings on a vehicle’s GVM. In this case, the maximum tow rating drops from 1600kg to 1000kg, but the payback is you get to keep the full 1036kg payload which is safer when towing and generally more useful.

The Sport’s cargo bay offers a competitive 6.0 cubic metres of load volume and with its 2555mm load floor length and 1351mm between the rear wheel housings, it can carry either two 1165mm-square standard Aussie pallets or up to the three 1200 x 800mm or 1200 x 1000mm Euro pallets.

Both types of pallets can be forklifted through the rear barn-doors with their 180-degree opening, but only the narrower Euro pallet could be loaded through the sliding side door with its 1030mm-wide opening.

The load floor length can be extended by almost half a metre via a swing-up hatch at the base of the cabin bulkhead, which accesses otherwise empty storage space beneath the front passenger seats. This useful feature allows extra-long items like lengths of timber, copper/PVC pipe, rolls of carpet, etc, to be carried.

The cargo bay has eight load-anchorage points and the load floor is protected by a tough vinyl covering. The walls and doors are lined plus there’s a handy 12-volt power outlet and bright LED lighting.

Plentiful cabin storage includes three levels of bins and a large-bottle holder in each front door plus upper/lower bottle holders on each side of the dash and a pop-out cupholder beneath the gearshift. There’s also a single A4-sized glovebox and more bins set into the top of the dash.

 Overhead is another cubby for small items and hidden beneath the two passenger seats is a cavernous storage area (when the cargo bay’s load-through hatch is closed of course) which is accessed from above through the hinged base cushions.

The centre seat’s backrest also folds forward to reveal a handy ‘mobile office’ work desk with pen holder, elastic strap for securing documents and two more cupholders.

Our test vehicle is the Transit Custom Sport 320S SWB, which translates to 3200kg GVM (it’s actually 3100kg), S for Sport and SWB for Short Wheelbase.

It’s available only with Ford’s 2.0-litre 'EcoBlue', four-cylinder turbo-diesel and six-speed automatic for a list price of $50,390 plus on-road costs.

Our example is finished in 'Blue Metallic' which is one of six optional premium colours that cost an additional $700. Other standard equipment for Sport buyers includes Bi-Xenon HID headlights with static bending and LED daytime running lights, body-coloured side mirrors and unique Cobra-style matt black body stripes and side decals.

There’s also a neat body kit with body-coloured front and rear bumpers, side skirts and wheel-arch flares; the latter neatly shrouds the black 17-inch machined alloys and grippy 215/65 R17 Michelin Agilis tyres. Stored underneath is a full-size steel spare.

The cabin can seat up to three on leather-appointed and heated seating, enhanced by a 10-way power-adjustable driver’s bucket seat with fold-down inboard armrest.

There's also a hard-wearing 'Sensico' (synthetic leather) steering wheel with height/reach adjustment and classy chrome air-vent surrounds with contrasting piano black fascia highlights on the dash.

Four-speaker multimedia includes an 8.0-inch touchscreen control and multiple connectivity including Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, Sync3, DAB+ digital radio, and more.

A new 4N16 variant of Mitsubishi’s 4N1 diesel engine family retains its predecessor’s 2.4-litre displacement but adds a second turbocharger. These work in sequence, with the smaller one providing fast response at low rpm and the larger one boosting performance at higher rpm.

The result is 150kW at 3500rpm and 470Nm of peak torque between 1500-2750rpm.

These outputs are 17kW and 40Nm more than the previous Triton and emissions are reduced with the addition of an AdBlue tank.

This engine is paired with an updated six-speed torque converter automatic and (on GLS and GSR) Mitsubishi’s excellent Super Select 4WD-II system with Torsen centre differential.

This still-advanced system offers seven drive modes, including full-time 4x4 which with the centre diff unlocked can be driven on all surfaces including dry sealed roads. With the centre diff locked for off-road use, it offers high and low range 4x4 with a 50:50 drive-split front and rear.

A rear diff-lock can also be engaged in low range.

Originally the Sport’s 2.0-litre EcoBlue four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine was tweaked for more power (+11kW) and torque (+15Nm) than the standard engine, as you’d expect.

However, given that availability of that unique variant ended in June 2022, it now shares the same engine as the standard Transit Custom.

While not class-leading, it still provides an energetic 125kW at 3500rpm and ample 390Nm of torque between 1500-2000rpm.

It also meets Euro emissions standards using AdBlue with SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) and offers a choice of Normal and Eco drive modes, plus an auto engine stop-start function which thankfully can be switched off.

The Sport also shares the same six-speed torque converter automatic used in the standard Transit Custom with ‘intelligent’ electronic protocols that monitor different driving styles, gradients and loads to optimise engine efficiency.

It also offers the choice of sequential manual shifting, but that’s done by flicking a small toggle switch on the side of the gearshift which doesn’t feel very sporty to use.

Mitsubishi claims an official combined average consumption of 7.7L/100km and the dash readout was displaying 8.7 at the completion of our 421km test, of which about one quarter was hauling a full payload. Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was higher again at 9.7 but within the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between official and real-world figures. So, based on our numbers, you could expect a realistic driving range of around 770km from its 75-litre tank.

Ford claims an official combined average of 8.0L/100km and the Sport’s dash display was showing 8.4 at the end of our 200km test, which was conducted without a load in normal mode with the engine stop/start function switched off.

Our own figure calculated from actual fuel bowser and trip meter readings came in at a higher 10.2 which is within the usual 1.0-2.0L/100km discrepancy usually found between dash figures and our own.

So, based on our figures, you could expect a realistic driving range of around 680km from its 70-litre tank.

The ergonomic changes are noticeable when you get behind the wheel, with a more comfortable and supportive seating position and increased cabin width providing a more spacious feel.

The new electric power steering is another highlight, being communicative and nicely weighted at all speeds, while the unique Australian suspension tune results in a more planted and sure-footed feel. The ride quality is also smoother, which is no doubt enhanced by more sprung weight and a longer wheelbase.

The new bi-turbo engine has good response and flexibility, with its 1250rpm-wide peak torque band between 1500-2750rpm providing ample pulling power at lower speeds with a seamless transition to maximum power at 3500rpm.

The six-speed automatic has gearing and shift calibrations that optimise engine performance. It’s also a quiet and efficient highway cruiser, requiring only 1750rpm to maintain 110km/h which is also within its peak torque band.

To test its load-hauling ability, we loaded 890kg into the load tub, which with driver and luggage equalled one tonne of payload that was 75kg below its legal limit.

The 'standard' leaf-spring rear suspension compressed more than 60mm under this weight, leaving a finger-width of static bump-stop clearance which initially seemed inadequate.

However, the rubber bump-stops have central voids that provide more of a cushioning effect at full suspension travel than traditional hard-nosed designs, which minimises thumps over big bumps and ensures a smoother ride.

The Triton displayed sure-footed handling and braking with this near-maximum payload on board. The bi-turbo engine was also on top of the job, with its ‘twin-stage’ turbocharging making light work of city, suburban and highway driving.

It also impressed on our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set-climb at 60km/h, self-shifting down to third gear to easily haul this load to the summit. Engine-braking on the way down was not as robust, but in our experience typical of sub-3.0-litre turbo-diesels restraining one tonne payloads on steep descents.

Our only gripe is the ‘Driver Attention Alert’ function. Its prominent detection module mounted on the steering column partly obscures the driver’s view of the lower instrument panel. And its over-sensitivity in determining driver inattention (like wearing sunnies, looking left and right at T-intersections etc) becomes annoying and needs refinement.

For a one-tonne van it’s surprisingly engaging (dare we say sporty?) to drive with torquey engine response, communicative steering and a bolstered driving seat that provides good lateral support of the upper body.

The quartet of disc brakes provides ample stopping power and the well-planted chassis on its larger diameter and lower profile Michelins responds vigorously to steering input, which makes it enjoyable to drive either when zipping through traffic or cruising on the open road. Overall refinement is good with low engine, tyre and wind noise.

It’s a comfortable highway hauler, with gearing that keeps engine rpm capped at a leisurely 2100rpm at 110km/h.

The fold-down inboard armrest is much appreciated on long hauls, but driving comfort could be further improved with a longer base cushion for better under-thigh support.

 All-round vision is as good as you could ask for, given a huge blind-spot over the driver’s left shoulder created by the cabin bulkhead.

The door mirrors are large enough to provide good views down both side of the van, aided by the bottom third of each being fitted with a wide-angle view.

Combined with other active driver aids like blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, parking sensors, reversing camera, etc, the working van’s traditional danger zones are well monitored which makes the Sport easy to live with if you drive it daily.

As the forklift was temporarily out of action, we didn’t conduct our usual GVM test with the Sport during this review. However, we have previously tested one with a 1030kg payload which was right on its maximum payload rating.

The rear suspension only compressed about 40mm which left plenty of bump-stop clearance and resulted in an even more planted feel on the road with no significant effect on engine, steering and braking response.

It also resulted in a smoother ride quality, which is to be expected given that the much heavier sprung weight ironed out bumps and other road irregularities.

Although its maximum five-star rating was achieved when the current Transit Custom generation was launched more than a decade ago, Ford to its credit has continually updated the van’s safety menu to ensure it has remained at the cutting edge of occupant protection, despite its impending demise.

Five years/100,000km standard warranty, or 10 years/200,000km if serviced at Mitsubishi dealers. Servicing every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-price for 10 scheduled services up to 10 years/150,000km is $6690, or an average of $669 per service.

The Transit Custom is covered by a five-year/unlimited km warranty.

Scheduled service intervals are 12 months/30,000km whichever occurs first.

Capped-price servicing is $399 annually for the first four years/120,000km whichever occurs first when serviced at Ford dealerships.