Porsche Cayenne vs Ssangyong Tivoli

What's the difference?

There is a lot riding on this new Cayenne Electric, it is the sales leader for the German brand and if it suffers the same sales decline as the Macan, that will be a big concern for Porsche.

The good news is it’s an impressive all-rounder, with an incredible breadth of capability. But so is the electric Macan.

Going electric hasn’t diminished its trademark Porsche elements, and instead has amplified them in many respects. The speed is nothing short of staggering in the Turbo, but across the range the on and off-road driving ability is impressive. 

Plus it has the kind of spacious, well-considered and premium appointed cabin you should expect for a luxury SUV.

There are two key differences that could see it succeed where the Macan has faltered. Unlike the Macan, Porsche’s decision to give Cayenne buyers the option to stick with internal combustion if they prefer, is likely to ensure it remains a popular member of its line-up for years to come.

And while the Macan was perhaps too much, too soon, the Cayenne arrives at a time when Australians are embracing electric cars more than ever before. Although the luxury and performance end of the EV market is growing more slowly than the mainstream.

As for the pick of the range, as mind-blowing as the Turbo is, the truth is (like pretty much every Porsche model) the entry-level Cayenne is arguably the pick of the bunch. It has all the performance you’ll reasonably need and offers a good blend of capability and luxury for the lowest price.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

I was asked the critical question while I had the Tivoli ELX on test – “Do you think people will buy this car?” After some time in thought, my answer was – “Not many… yet.”

Those who can look past the brand perceptions are getting an SUV which is damn near as good as anything on the market – and likely cheaper to run.

To that, you can say a lot of things: If only it cost slightly less. If only its rear was better looking. If only it had a five-star safety rating.

But here it is – the fact that the Tivoli can even hold a candle to its slick, finely tuned competition says a lot. The Double Dragon is back, and if it can afford to stick around for a while, perhaps it will stand a chance of putting the big players on notice.

For all the positives of continuing to offer the previous generation Cayenne alongside the new one, it does come with some downsides too. The most obvious is unmissable design differences between the older generation and this newer one.

This new electric version has the same basic silhouette of the previous Cayenne, but the details give it a distinctive look. Being electric it needs to cut through the air as efficiently as possible, so this new model is longer and lower than the internal combustion versions.

The details of the design also give it a sharper, more modern look too. Not that the previous Cayenne suddenly looks old and outdated, but if you stick with petrol power you will be sacrificing the latest styling.

Another surprising design element with this new model is an optional off-road package, which includes a unique front bumper for greater off-road clearance and approach angle. It’s unlikely that too many Cayenne Electric owners will head deep into the bush, but for those who want to, the unique bumper will help them go further. 

However, it does create a rather unusual look, as it has quite a pronounced undercut, or what I referred to as an ‘overbite’ that definitely doesn’t look as well-proportioned as the standard bodykit.

Inside, for all the hype around Porsche performance, one of the brand’s standout features has always been interior design. 

This new Cayenne looks really interesting inside, with curved screens for the digital instrument display and the multimedia system, as well as the option to add a third screen in-front of the passenger. 

The overall level of fit and finish, the detail and quality of the materials is exactly what you’d expect from a premium brand and an SUV at this price point.

SsangYong is hardly a brand known for its consistent or good-looking design. In the past, the brand has floundered between the squared-off lines of the Musso and the unresolved bulbous curves of the last-gen Korando.

The brand’s re-launch has finally brought it up to speed, with every car across its range featuring a consistent design language. It’s improved out of sight, but still isn’t without its flaws.

Up front, there’s an angry-looking, squared-off horizontally slotted grille, with angles galore wrapping around the small SUV’s sides.

The angles continue up the A-pillar and across the roof for a squared-off, European-influenced roofline.

Then, around the back things get… strange. A pronounced curvy ridge makes its way over the rear wheels and into a rounded-out boot. It seems at odds with the angular rear glass and lower garnish.

There’s just way too much going on around the back; it’s overly styled. The chintzy chrome finish around the lower reflectors doesn’t help, nor do the big round SsangYong badge and bold ‘T I V O L I’ typeface.

The 16-inch alloys on the EX and ELX grade are a simple 10-spoke matte-silver. They’re nothing special, but at least they're easy to clean.

Inside, things are also mixed. There’s plenty of good and bad. The seats are clad in a robust cloth with plenty of sponge for comfort, and there are sensibly placed soft surfaces in the doors and on the centre console for your elbows.

The dash has an aesthetically pleasing symmetrical theme to it and is finished mostly in decent plastics. The 7.0-inch media screen is pretty good, too, but the rest of the centre stack is a bit nasty and old fashioned.

There’s the mix of gloss plastic and silver surfaces, a giant climate control dial and the so-so buttons that litter its surface. It reminds me of Korean car designs past, like the Holden (Daewoo) Captiva and generations-old Hyundais. Credit where credit is due, though - it all feels much better built.

I’m actually a big fan of the Tivoli’s steering wheel, it has a ridged, chunky shape and is finished in a pleasing artificial-leather material. The function stalks behind it are solid, with rotary dials on them to control lights and wipers. As the primary touch-points for the driver it’s neat that they have a unique, SsangYong personality to them.

As for the space and practicality, once again Porsche showcases that it’s not a one-trick pony brand. As fast as the Cayenne Electric is - and is very fast - the designers have also ensured it is a genuinely spacious vehicle for a family.

The second row space is good, enough to take two adults in comfort and easily accommodate three kids.

The SUV is obviously the more practical of the pair, with the Coupe losing some rear headroom.

As for the boot, space varies between 781L for the Cayenne SUV and 747L for the S and Turbo SUVs, while the Coupe looks sleeker but comes at the expense of cargo capacity, dropping to 534L for the Coupe and Coupe S and just 500L for the Coupe Turbo. 

The technology integration is well-considered too. One highlight is the new curved central multimedia screen, which has a palm rest that extends out from the centre fascia to make it more ergonomic to use the screen. 

The intuitive menu, as well as the physical controls for the volume and climate control, plus the ability to integrate the smartphone apps, means the key non-driving functions are incredibly easy-to-use, even on the move. 

Integrated into that palm rest is a large centre console space between the front seats, which has both wireless smartphone charging as well as four USB-C ports and two cupholders. It means there is plenty of small item storage space to go with all the room for people.

The Tivoli might be a small SUV but it has a cavernous cabin. It’s seriously impressive and rivals some of the best players in this segment, like the Honda HR-V.

The front seat offers huge amounts of headroom, leagues of legroom, great space for your arms on either side and a fully telescopically adjustable steering wheel.

Storage is comprised of a shallow trench under the climate-control stack, decently sized cupholders in the centre console and doors, as well as a deep console box and a glovebox, which seems to disappear forever into the dash.

There’s also a rather odd trench cut out of the dash above the console box. It’s ridged and has a rubbery surface but seems useless for storing things, which will simply topple out when you accelerate.

As previously mentioned, there are comfortable surfaces for resting your elbows on for front occupants.

Room for back-seat dwellers is also excellent, with awesome legroom for the segment and leagues of airspace even for taller folk. There are the same padded elbow-rests in the doors and deep cupholders, but no air-conditioning vents or USB ports.

There are also weird elastic ropes on the back of the front seats for storing things (with mixed success) and a pull-down armrest.

The boot is rated at 423-litres (VDA), which is deceptively large (size-wise not far off the HR-V’s 437-litre space). The problem here is the shape of the boot itself. It’s deep from the floor to the retractable screen, and SsangYong says it will hold three golf bags, but it’s the narrow width and length which limit  its potential.

I found it awkward to move some odd-shaped objects, like a heater and some boxes, and the high entry-point to the bootlid makes things a little difficult when moving heavier items.

Our ELX has significantly more room thanks to a space-saver spare under the boot floor. The Ultimate, which sits above has a full-size spare, further limiting boot space.

There are the same odd elastic ropes in the edges of the boot wall for smaller loose objects or cables.

If SsangYong wants to roar back onto the market and challenge people’s perceptions of the brand, it’ll first need to get them in the door. After all, this low-ball strategy worked for Hyundai and Kia, who infiltrated Australia with models like the Excel and Rio, which offered all the features of more established brands at a cut price.

The challenge is not tarnishing your brand while you’re at it. Has SsangYong pulled it off with the Tivoli?

Our ELX is the mid-spec car, sitting above the entry-level EX and below the all-wheel-drive and diesel-only Ultimate.

The $29,990 ticket price for our front-wheel-drive diesel would be about right if the Tivoli was from any mainstream brand. For roughly the same money you can get a top-spec Mitsubishi ASX Exceed ($30,990), Honda HR-V RS ($31,990), fellow Korean Hyundai Kona Elite ($29,500), or a diesel-powered Mazda CX-3 Maxx Sport ($29,990).

Oh, and despite it looking quite large in the pictures, the Tivoli is most definitely a small SUV, being narrower than a Hyundai Kona and not as long as a CX-3.

Feature-wise, our ELX gets 16-inch alloy wheels, a 7-inch multimedia touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto support, front & rear parking sensors with reversing camera, auto-dimming rear-view mirror, leather trim on the steering wheel, standard faire cloth seats (which weirdly remind me of Hyundai’s seats from about a generation ago), roof-rails, luggage screen in the boot, dual-zone climate control, privacy glass and halogen headlamps with LED DRLs.

Not bad. The safety offering is not only good but available across the range, so check the Safety section of this review out for more on that.

Missing at this price are leather trim (available on the Kona Elite and ASX), active cruise, LED front lighting and powered front seats. It’s not crazy value, but it’s also not bad at $29,990.

As mentioned earlier, there are three initial Cayenne Electric variants and each offer a different powertrain option. All are dual-motor, all-wheel drive but the power levels vary greatly depending on what you spend.

The standard Cayenne Electric comes with 300kW (325kW on Overboost), which is enough for this five-seat, family friendly SUV to launch 0-100km/h in just 4.8 seconds, which is genuinely impressive.

However, stepping up to the Cayenne S raises the power level to 400kW (490kW on Overboost) and drops the 0-100km/h time to 3.8 seconds.

Finally there’s the Cayenne Turbo, with up to 850kW of power and a claimed 0-100km/h capability of just 2.5 seconds. Which is borderline crazy for such a big SUV. 

It is worth explaining that the 850kW claim for the Cayenne Turbo is only available for short bursts of performance when you activate Overboost, and the ‘standard’ output for the two electric motors is 630kW, which may sound like a lot less but is actually more than enough to make the Cayenne Turbo feel fast anytime you need more performance.

Our Tivoli is powered by a 1.6-litre four-cylinder turbo diesel engine producing 84kW and 300Nm of torque.

That seems a little low on the power front compared to petrol competitors, but the strong torque figure available from an almost instantaneous 1500rpm gives this engine a solid amount of get up and go.

If you aren’t opposed to diesel, I would strongly suggest this engine over its underpowered 1.6-litre petrol equivalent, as it has almost twice the available torque.

It might seem risky for SsangYong to be offering diesel in a segment where the fuel type is unpopular, but it makes sense from a global supply point of view, as diesel is largely the fuel of choice in the Tivoli’s home country of South Korea.

The ELX is front-wheel drive and can only be had with a six-speed torque converter auto transmission manufactured by Aisin.

The Cayenne is Porsche’s third electric model, after the Taycan and Macan, and it shows. The brand has taken battery production in-house for the Cayenne, producing the 106kWh unit at its own factory in Eastern Europe.

Range is rated at 542km for the Cayenne, 571km for the Cayenne S and 537km for the Cayenne Turbo.

Thermal efficiency is the key selling point for Porsche, as it unlocks not only the peak performance but also the repeatability that allows the Cayenne to launch so quickly over and over again. It’s notable, that unlike most other EVs that get slower the more time you extract peak performance out of them, Porsche was happy for us to undertake multiple acceleration runs in the same vehicle.

But that’s not the only trick Porsche has up its sleeve. It will be introducing inductive charging with the Cayenne. This means you’ll be able to buy a charging pad you can place on the floor in your garage, and simply drive it, park on top of it and the Cayenne will charge wirelessly.

This has the potential to be a game-changer for EV buyers as it removes the need to plug in to replenish the batteries, making life even easier for owners. It’s not available in Australia at the time of publication, but the company says it will be available from the fourth quarter and all Australian-delivered models, even those sold now, will be able to be retrofitted to take advantage of the technology.

Over my week of mainly urban driving I scored a fuel-consumption figure of 7.8L/100km against a claimed urban figure of 7.4L/100km which is not too bad, but also not stellar.

The official claimed/combined usage figure is at a bold-sounding 5.5L/100km.

The Tivoli has a 47-litre fuel tank.

Porsche Australia invited us to drive the new Cayenne Electric in Port Lincoln, South Australia. While a picturesque part of the country, it seemed like an unlikely venue to test drive a new Porsche, as it’s typically Ford Ranger/Toyota HiLux country.

But one of the reasons Porsche launched the Cayenne Electric in regional South Australia was because they had managed to find a small airstrip we could use to fully explore the acceleration potential. 

Even some operator error, which meant my launch was using ‘just’ the 630kW, the acceleration was sickeningly fast and had me hitting more than 170km/h in just 200m. With the full 850kW unleashed the Cayenne is actually faster 0-100km/h than Porsche’s hero sports car, the iconic 911 Turbo S. 

That alone is a remarkable achievement, but Porsche had a few more reasons for taking us to Port Lincoln. After a drive on some sealed roads, which demonstrated the SUV's on-road composure, we found ourselves heading off-road… more off-road than I thought possible (or at least sensible) in a Porsche.

After surviving some of the gnarliest rocky roads, we found ourselves in some stunning sand dunes. We were driving the Cayenne S with the optional off-road package but the only other modification was to let down the tyres.

Carving through sand dunes like you’re in the Dakar Rally is likely to be a rare job for the Cayenne Electric, but the fact it is capable is immensely impressive and helps to demonstrate the breadth of capability that this electric SUV has.

But Porsche wasn’t finished showing off just how multi-talented the Cayenne is. 

They had a Cayenne Turbo attached to a trailer, carrying the previously beaten 911 Turbo S, to prove that it can live up to its claimed 3500kg towing capacity.

Towing a nearly $600k sports car with a $260k SUV is an expensive way to demonstrate the point, but the Cayenne didn’t miss a beat. Certainly the battery was dropping more rapidly than it was unladen, but the electric Cayenne underlined that it can do everything the petrol versions can manage (at least over a short distance).

We never recommend that you drive blindfolded, but if you could and you drove the Tivoli, I honestly believe you’d have trouble telling it apart from any other small SUV on sale today. 

The diesel engine feels strong from the get-go and pushes the 1390kg SUV along with a reasonable urgency. It’s no performance drivetrain, but it's as good as, if not better than, most of the petrol competitors.

The six-speed torque converter auto is mostly great around town but is old-school in that you can definitely feel each ratio. It also had the unfortunate habit of occasionally grabbing the wrong gear.

I once caught it out altogether under heavy acceleration and it spent a whole second fishing for the ratio it wanted. It’s still better than a continuously variable transmission (CVT) for driver engagement, though.

Steering is on the light side but is direct and offers decent feedback. The ELX offers three steering modes - 'Comfort', 'Normal', and 'Sport', which artificially alter the weight behind the steering. 'Normal' is by far the best.

The suspension was also notably impressive. Fellow Korean brands, Hyundai and Kia, have harked on for a long time about local tuning efforts, but I found the Tivoli’s suspension tune almost as good. It’s a slightly more spongey, comfort-focused tune, but I was impressed at how composed it felt in the corners.

The ELX has a cheap torsion-bar rear suspension setup, which could only really be noticed over rough road conditions.

Behind the wheel, the Tivoli was also surprisingly quiet at lower speeds. This makes for a nice, quiet drive around town, despite the diesel engine, but at speeds above 80km/h and engine rpms above 3000 the noise became significantly worse.

I’d say the Tivoli drives just as well as most Hyundais and Kias from just a few years ago. There’s room for improvement in the little details, but for the brand’s first effort since its international re-boot, it does a darned good job.

The Tivoli comes with a reasonably comprehensive safety offering, but there’s room to improve here, too.

On the active-safety front our ELX has auto emergency braking (AEB – works up to 180km/h), lane-departure warning (LDW), lane-keep assist (LKAS) and high-beam assist.

There’s no active cruise, blind-spot monitoring (BSM), traffic-sign recognition (TSR), or driver-attention alert (DAA) available on even the top-spec Ultimate.

The Tivoli has seven airbags, two ISOFIX child-seat mounting points on the rear outboard seats and top-tether anchorages across the second row, as well as the expected brake and stability controls (but no torque vectoring).

The Tivoli has received a four-star ANCAP safety rating as of 2016, however this is based on a EuroNCAP score and now-available lane-assist technologies were not factored into this test.

The Cayenne Electric is covered by Porsche’s usual three-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, and the battery gets eight years of coverage.

Both of these are fairly standard by historical terms, but with so many luxury brands - including Audi, BMW, Lexus and Mercedes-Benz - all now offering five years of coverage, it does leave Porsche lagging behind.

Servicing intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, which is standard for an internal combustion engine vehicle.

Porsche doesn’t offer capped-price servicing, so prices may vary from dealer to dealer. However, the brand does sell a special EV-focused ‘Porsche Scheduled Maintenance Plan’ that costs $1995 for three years, $3695 for four years and $3995 for five years of servicing. 

The SsangYong Tivoli now leads the small SUV segment with a seven-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty, which is miles ahead of the acceptable industry standard of five years/unlimited kilometres offered by most competitors.

Service pricing comes in at a completely fixed and impressive-for-a-diesel $322 per yearly 15,000km service for the life of the warranty.

Extra service items are tidily laid out in a chart breaking down parts cost, labour, and total price, with the most notably expensive item being transmission fluid ($577), which, at worst, is recommended to be changed at 100,000km.

From this we can tell SsangYong intends to target Kia’s audience and use this part of the business to categorically beat its competition.