Mitsubishi Express vs Nissan Navara

What's the difference?

The Mitsubishi Express is an impressive return to the market for the brand, albeit one that won’t suit every buyer’s needs or wants. If you need to personalise your van, or if you value the safety technology offered by rivals like the HiAce, then you may need to shop elsewhere.

But if you do choose the Express, you will be getting a value-packed and very comfortable van that is backed by a broad dealer network and decent ownership prospects.

The D27 Nissan Navara represents badge engineering at its best or worst, depending on your point of view regarding platform sharing. However, when assessed purely on its merits as a standalone tool of trade, the entry-level SL is a competent and economical workhorse that’s worthy of at least cross-shopping with the major players.

The badges are different, and so is the front bumper and bonnet. But you might otherwise struggle to tell what’s changed between a Trafic and the Express.

One thing Mitsubishi is offering, though, is a standard three-seat cabin on all models, plus dual side sliding doors and rear barn doors across every variant in the line-up. That’s a win for hard workers.

Here’s a table of dimensions to help you size up which might be best for you:

As you can see, the extra size on offer in the LWB model is strictly nose to tail, with no other compromises to consider apart from, understandably, the larger turning circle. But Mitsubishi claims even the smaller version can cope with two pallets in the back.

As for cargo zone dimensions, here’s how the two body styles compare:

It’s worth noting that there is no high-roof option available, where you can get a taller body in most competitor vans. 

And while it is a bonus that there are barn doors (still not available on the HiAce), you can’t option a liftback tailgate. Plus, while the dual side sliding doors is an advantage as many OEMs charge extra for a driver’s side slider, you can’t option glazing for the rear door from Mitsubishi.

The company says that it is simply offering what it can get as part of the Alliance with Renault, but if you need to tailor a van to suit your specific needs, you might end up going with the French van (or the VW Transporter, which is the most configurable on the market). 

Check the engine specs section below for more specs on weights and capacities. Next, let’s take a look at the cabin, starting with some interior images.

It looks like a base model Triton GLX given the Navara SL’s modest front and rear styling tweaks, which are not as substantial nor convincing as platform-sharing rivals like Mazda’s BT-50 or Volkswagen’s Amarok in creating a clear visual distinction from its donor.

Nissan has been equally economical with interior changes. Even so, the work-focused cabin is functional and reasonably spacious for a dual cab, with splashes of satin chrome combined with white upholstery stitching and fake carbon-fibre surfaces providing a touch of style to predominantly grey tones.

With a three-seater cabin as standard, the Express is already at an advantage over a HiAce. You can’t get a three-seat HiAce, and if you’ve got apprentices or workmates that always need a lift - but you don’t want the space sacrifice that comes with a crew van - it could be a crucial decision-maker for you.

And there are decent amenities for the occupants, too, with three cup holders and ample storage options across the dashboard, as well as large bottle holders in the doors. In fact, all told, Mitsubishi claims there is 43 litres of loose item storage in the cabin.

The driver’s seat gets manual height adjustment, lumbar adjustment and an armrest, as well as steering wheel rake and reach adjustment, so getting a comfortable driving position should be a cinch. Unlike the Trafic, there’s no driver’s seat heating option, but the clever “Load Through” cavity - for loading items up to 4.14m long - under the passenger seat is fitted on all models (but unlike the Trafic, which has a bulkhead, there’s no porthole, and the vehicles we tested with cargo cages didn’t have an opening to make the best use of this).

It’s set up for hard work, with rubber floor mats and a “hard wearing” poly trim on the steering wheel, though that finish is a bit coarse, and not as pleasant to hold as a leather wheel. The seat trim is fabric, and feels to be made of a durable material.

Ergonomically, it is no different to a Renault Trafic. Most important controls fall easily to hand, though people unfamiliar with Renault switchgear may need to pay attention at the dealership when the positioning of the cruise control and speed limiter buttons are explained. The buttons are between the dashboard and steering wheel.

And if you’re looking for the volume button, it’s on the weird little stalk behind the wheel itself. That has tuning and phone controls too, and it takes some getting used to. Further, if you’re used to the blinkers being on the “right” side of the steering wheel in Japanese cars, the Express is the exception. 

When it comes to media and infotainment, there’s a lot left to be desired. There is no touch screen at all, and you can’t option one, either. Some drivers will appreciate that, but others will lament the lack of smartphone mirroring tech (Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), and likewise there is no sat nav available, either. There’s not even a CD player, but as standard the Express gets a smartphone holster with USB port on top of the dash, so there are two USB ports to keep things charged, plus a 12-volt below if you need it.

But the simple media system does offer a USB port to connect your phone or MP3 player, and Bluetooth phone and audio streaming, as well as DAB digital and AM/FM radio. The sound system has just two speakers, but it’s okay.

The cargo zone is, as you’d expect, a big, largely empty space. There’s no steel bulkhead option to separate the two zones, which could be frustrating for some customers - though if you can deal with the noise reverberation but just want to make sure things don’t fly from front to rear, there is a mesh cargo barrier available.

There are 14 tie-down points in the SWB (eight floor mount, six wall mount) and 16 tie eyelets in the LWB (10 floor, six wall). Plus there’s a rear-mount 12-volt outlet near the back doors to keep things charged.

With its 2126kg kerb weight and 3190kg GVM our test vehicle has a useful 1064kg payload rating, so it’s a genuine one tonner.

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 6250kg GCM rating (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it would require a sizeable 440kg reduction in vehicle payload to tow its maximum trailer weight.

Not that many (if any) owners of utes this size would need to tow 3500kg but it’s important to be aware of these numbers when towing heavy trailers to avoid dangerous and illegal overloading.

The Navara’s load tub is almost square with its 1555mm length and 1545mm width. It’s also 525mm deep and with 1135mm between the rear wheel housings it can’t fit a standard Aussie pallet but will carry a Euro.

Our test vehicle does not come standard with a tub-liner so its painted surfaces are prone to scratches and dents. There’s four anchorage points for securing loads and the tailgate assist feature allows easier lowering and raising.

The driver and front passenger share good space and comfort, with storage that includes a bottle holder and bin in each door plus a large open shelf above the single glovebox and an overhead glasses holder. The centre console offers flat storage with two USB ports and a 12v socket up front, along with two cupholders in the centre and a lidded box at the back.

Rear seating is also comfortable and surprisingly spacious for tall people, given I’m 186cm and when seated behind the driver’s seat when set in my position I have ample knee and headroom. However, shoulder room is tight for three adults, which is tolerable for short trips but a maximum of two would be preferable for longer drives.

Rear passenger storage includes a bottle holder and bin in each door plus pockets on each front seat backrest. There’s another 12v socket in the rear of the centre console and the centre seat’s backrest folds forward to serve as an armrest with dual cupholders.

The bench seat’s base cushion is fixed, so unlike numerous rivals it can’t swing up and be stored vertically if more internal carrying space is required.

The fifth generation Navara, which is available only in 4x4 dual-cab ute configuration, comes in four model grades comprising SL ($53,348 plus on-road costs), ST ($56,765), ST-X ($63,177) and Pro-4X ($68,418) designed to cater for commercial applications through to lifestyle/recreational use.

Our test vehicle is the entry-level SL with its list pricing in the same ballpark as workhorse equivalents from major players including the Ford Ranger XL 2.0L auto ($51,130), closely related Triton GLX 2.4L auto ($51,640), Isuzu D-Max SX 2.2L auto ($52,200) and Toyota HiLux Workmate 2.0L auto ($53,990).

Like its Navara siblings it's available only with a 2.4-litre bi-turbo four-cylinder diesel engine and six-speed automatic transmission. 

The SL's work-focused standard features include 17-inch steel wheels with 265/65R17 all-terrain tyres and a full-size spare wheel, LED headlights/daytime running lights/tail-lights, tailgate assist, 360-degree camera and front/rear parking sensors to name a few.

The interior is also designed with hard work in mind with its wipe-clean vinyl floor and black fabric trim but there’s also creature comforts like remote keyless entry, single-zone climate control, second-row air vents, power-adjustable lumbar support for the driver’s seat, multi-function steering wheel controls and more.

There’s also multiple USB ports and 12v sockets, a 7.0-inch instrument cluster display and a 9.0-inch touchscreen to control the four-speaker multimedia system which includes wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity and DAB+ digital radio.

There are a couple of options available in the Express range.

Elect for a six-speed manual transmission and you get a 1.6-litre twin-turbo four-cylinder diesel engine producing 103kW of power (at 3500rpm) and 340Nm of torque (at 1500rpm). 

Choose the six-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and the engine is a 2.0-litre four-cylinder single-turbo diesel motor, with 125kW of power (at 3500rpm) and 380Nm of torque (at 1500rpm). This engine meets a stricter emissions requirement than the other (Euro 6 vs Euro 5) because it has a 25-litre AdBlue urea treatment tank, though both have a diesel particulate filter (DPF), too. Depending on what side of the fence you sit, that’s either an advantage or an added cost and burden.

The Express is only available in front-wheel drive (FWD/2WD), so there’s no rear-wheel drive (RWD) or all-wheel drive (AWD/FWD) options available. 

Of course, you’ll need to consider weight if you’re buying a van like this. And it comes down to more than just engine specs - you need to consider payload, towing specifications, gross vehicle mass (GVM) and gross combination mass (GCM).

Here’s a table with the figures you need to know:

Wanting a petrol, hybrid, electric, plug-in hybrid or gas version of the Express? No can do… well, not in Australia, and not yet.

You will have to stay tuned for our full-scale Tradie Review on the Mitsubishi Express, where we will load it up to its GVM limit. But for day-to-day driving impressions, see the driving section below.

The Navara’s 2.4-litre four-cylinder ‘bi-turbo’ diesel engine is equipped with two turbochargers which work in sequence to boost efficiency, with the smaller one providing fast response at low rpm and the larger one optimising response at higher rpm.

It produces 150kW of power at 3500rpm and its sizeable 470Nm of torque is served at full strength between 1500-2750rpm. It’s also Euro 6B emissions compliant using AdBlue.

This is paired with a six-speed torque converter automatic, offering the choice of sequential manual shifting which can be preferable when hauling and/or towing heavy loads particularly in hilly terrain.

The 4x4 system is dual-range, part-time offering 2H (2WD High Range), 4H (4WD High Range) and 4L (4WD Low Range) selected by a dial on the centre console, where you’ll also find a button to engage the locking rear diff.

The most significant differences between the Triton and Navara are in suspension design and tuning, with the D27 Navara replacing the previous D23 generation’s coil-spring rear end with the Triton’s more traditional leaf-spring arrangement.

Nissan has also collaborated with Melbourne-based engineering partner Premcar in developing three unique suspension tuning packages focused on damper (aka shock absorber) refinement, aimed at enhanced steering response, handling stability and ride comfort.

The premium Pro-4X and mid-grade ST-X each have unique settings while the work-focused SL and ST share the same calibration designed for hauling loads, including heavy-duty four-leaf rear suspension. All model grades also feature electric power steering.

Fuel consumption for the Mitsubishi Express depends on the engine/transmission combination you choose. 

The 1.6-litre twin-turbo manual version is the more frugal according to official combined cycle consumption figures, at 6.2 litres per 100 kilometres. Opt for the 2.0-litre single-turbo auto and the fuel consumption is claimed at 7.3 litres per 100 kilometres. 

Those figures are based on a driving loop that doesn’t incorporate loaded testing, so you can expect your real world consumption to be higher - but even so, the claims are lower than the likes of the HiAce (7.5L diesel manual, 8.2L diesel auto).

On test, for instance, I saw a return of 7.9L/100km in the SWB auto, which experienced a few traffic snarls in Sydney. The LWB auto with 200kg of ballast over the rear axle - in which I did 100km of mixed urban, interurban and freeway driving with free flowing traffic for the most part - had a displayed return of 7.8L100km. 

The fuel tank capacity is large, at 80 litres. That means theoretically excellent range on a single tank - up to 1290km if you can manage the claimed consumption in the manual model.

Nissan claims combined average consumption of 7.7L/100km but the dash display was showing 9.4 at the completion of our 496km test, which included our usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third was hauling a near maximum payload.

Our own consumption figure, based on fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, came in slightly lower at 9.1L/100km which is comfortably within the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between manufacturer claims and real-world consumption and excellent economy from mostly metro driving.

So, based on our test results, we estimate the Navara SL has a real-world driving range of more than 800km from its 75-litre tank.

If you’ve never driven a modern-day mid-size (2.5-3.5 tonne) van, you will be amazed at their road manners. There’s not a bad one in the class, in round terms, and the Express builds upon the Renault Trafic’s reputation as being among the best in the class for comfort and drivability.

It really is a pretty sweet appliance, with a ride quality that is mostly excellent whether you’re in the SWB or LWB model. It offers decent comfort and control at low speeds and high speeds, and is really only upset when the potholes are deep or have sharp edges. 

The SWB model has a slightly more pitchy ride when unladen, but we didn’t get a chance to put any weight in it just yet. The LWB model had 200kg of ballast over the rear axle, and that weight - combined with the extra 400mm of wheelbase - made for a very comfortable drive. Not too mushy or slushy, but actually nicely cushy. 

Aside from the low-speed electric whirring sound from the power steering, the steering is terrific - it is nicely weighted and pivots well, even the LWB model. Sure, it definitely feels its size, but it’s easily manageable and surprisingly agile for such a big rig, and easy enough to park as well, thanks to the split side mirrors and reversing camera (which pops up in the rear-view mirror and is quite small, but there are rear parking sensors to help out, too).

Because I sampled both automatic models, that meant I only had the chance to sample the 2.0-litre four-cylinder single-turbo diesel engine - and it’s a very strong performer.  

I never once felt like I needed any more pulling power with this - admittedly small - amount of weight on board. 

And the dual-clutch transmission is decent as well. You get away from a standing start pretty well, with just a little bit of turbo and transmission lag to contend with. It’s never annoying, even in traffic jam drudgery - unless the engine start stop system activates, and then it can be a little bit sluggish to get moving again.

However, as is the case with plenty of dual-clutch transmissions in commercial vehicles, it’s not quite as measured or linear in its progress when there’s no load on-board, tending to lurch away a little more when unladen.

And while we were hardly pushing the GVM limits with only 200kg in the back, the brake pedal of the LWB did feel at times like the push was a little longer than it should have been. 

It is a decently refined van, especially considering there’s no steel bulkhead to shield you from the noise intrusion at the rear. One thing, though - our test vans both had optional rubber mats fitted, and they were quite odorous. 

As mentioned the visibility is pretty decent, but I couldn’t help but feel jealous of a HiAce I overtook that had its blind-spot monitoring system flicker on the mirror. It would just add a little bit of extra piece of mind, as there’s no vision over your shoulder, and if you do have a load in the back it’s hard to see in the rearview mirror. And unlike other vans in the market, you can’t option rear windows, either. 

Large handles on the A pillars assist climbing aboard into a comfortable and spacious driving position, enhanced by steering wheel and seat adjustments (including power lumbar support) plus a left footrest, which ideally could be a tad wider.

The claimed ride and handling changes resulting from Premcar’s suspension tuning are so seamless they would be hard for most Navara drivers to define. All that matters is how it feels behind the wheel.

And I must say it’s a nice thing to drive, which is consistent with all the Premcar-enhanced D23 Navaras we've tested before it, combining excellent steering feel with supple yet responsive ride and handling whether unladen or loaded.

The switch to electric power steering also provides a noticeably light turning effort when parking which becomes increasingly firm with a stronger self-centering effect at highway speeds, like all variable-ratio systems should.

The six-speed auto’s gearing optimises performance in urban use by keeping the engine operating within its peak torque band most of the time, which ensures a consistently energetic response. It’s also a relaxed highway cruiser, requiring less than 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h where low noise levels allow conversations without raised voices.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 650kg into the load tub, which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload of 830kg that was still more than 200kg below its legal limit. The heavy-duty rear springs only compressed about 30mm under this loading, which ensured ample bump-stop clearance and no bottoming out on our test route.

Its handling remained surefooted and predictable when hauling this payload, which, combined with the Navara’s hearty 470Nm, ensured it made light work of our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km long set climb. It also provided strong engine braking on the way down, so overall it proved to be a competent load hauler.

The only negative from a driver’s perspective is the Navara’s inheritance of the Triton’s annoying driver distraction monitor, which even beeped and prompted me to ‘please look forward’ when I dared to look at the central and passenger door mirrors when overtaking another vehicle. Seriously? It’s ironic that a driver distraction monitor can be distracting, but it is.

The Navara has a five-star ANCAP rating (tested 2024), and comes with eight airbags, auto emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian and cyclist detection and junction assist, front and rear cross-traffic alert, traffic sign recognition, adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping, front and rear parking sensors, 360-degree/reversing cameras, trailer stability assist and lots more.

The rear seat has ISOFIX child-seat anchorages on the two outer seating positions and three top-tethers.

Mitsubishi is constantly dabbling in the long warranty promotional deals, but the standard warranty on offer for the Express is five years/100,000km.

The brand also has a capped price servicing plan for the first three years/45,000km of ownership. With intervals set at 12 months/15,000km, the costs are low, at $250 per visit.

And if you service your van with Mitsubishi’s dealer network, you will also get roadside assistance for up to four years.

If you’re wondering how that compares with the Renault plan? It’s a three-year/unlimited km warranty (but promotional five year/200,000km warranty plans are available until 31 August 2020). The Trafic has capped price servicing every 12 months or 30,000km intervals, or as determined by the oil sensor, at $599 per visit - but as of July 1 2020, it spans five years/150,000km, and is available with up to five years’ roadside assistance when maintained in-network. 

You might be curious about Mitsubishi Express problems - but it could be worth taking a look at the Renault Trafic problems page to find out if there have been issues around reliability, engine or transmission problems, recalls and common complaints.

The Nissan Navara comes standard with a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty but up to 10 years/300,000km with matching roadside assist is available if the car is serviced at Nissan dealers.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km with capped pricing applicable for the first five scheduled services totalling $2495, or an average of $499 which is competitive with numerous well established rivals.

Nissan Australia has a large network of around 180-200 dealers which includes every state and territory.