What's the difference?
It has been a while since we’ve seen a Mitsubishi Express van on sale in Australia, and the one that has just launched here is a very different offering to its predecessor.
That’s because you could cover the tri-diamond badges on the grille or back door of the new 2020 Mitsubishi Express and be fooled into thinking that you’re looking at a Renault Trafic. Because you are.
The Express is a direct bi-product of the Alliance between Renault and Mitsubishi, and just like the Trafic, it’s made in France, at Renault’s Sandouville plant.
This isn’t a comparison - the headline isn’t Mitsubishi Express vs Renault Trafic - but the question is: why would you choose one over the other?
You’d be correct in assessing this as an exercise in badge engineering - Mitsubishi calls it “branded product” - but it could well be that you’d choose an Express because Mitsubishi has a broader network of dealers (186 at the time of writing, versus Renault’s 56), not to mention the potential for major fleet discounts and an upstream ute alternative in the Triton that helps the brand “offer the complete LCV solution”. Renault, you could counter, has a smaller and larger van for its own “LCV solution”.
There’s more to consider, including ownership, safety and value for money - read on for all the details.
Toyota claims its first HiLux BEV (Battery Electric Vehicle) has been designed primarily with mining, business and government fleet customers in mind, by combining the iconic ute’s 4x4 all-terrain capability with zero tailpipe emissions only a full-electric drivetrain can deliver.
To prove its suitability for harsh Aussie conditions, Toyota claims the HiLux BEV has undergone more than two years of testing on site with major mining companies, covering thousands of kilometres in ambient temperatures up to 50 degrees.
We recently sampled the HiLux BEV as a daily driver in metropolitan use, to see if its mining-focused credentials translate to being a practical alternative to traditional diesel power for tradies working in busy urban environments.
The Mitsubishi Express is an impressive return to the market for the brand, albeit one that won’t suit every buyer’s needs or wants. If you need to personalise your van, or if you value the safety technology offered by rivals like the HiAce, then you may need to shop elsewhere.
But if you do choose the Express, you will be getting a value-packed and very comfortable van that is backed by a broad dealer network and decent ownership prospects.
Given the HiLux BEV was developed in close cooperation with mining companies, its relatively short driving range appears tailor-made for that role given the daily driving distances (typically around 150km or less) in underground and open-cut mining operations. However, determining if our SR5 test vehicle is equally well suited to urban tradie duties would require careful analysis of driving range and payload/towing requirements, to determine if its emissions-free high purchase price can be justified.
The badges are different, and so is the front bumper and bonnet. But you might otherwise struggle to tell what’s changed between a Trafic and the Express.
One thing Mitsubishi is offering, though, is a standard three-seat cabin on all models, plus dual side sliding doors and rear barn doors across every variant in the line-up. That’s a win for hard workers.
Here’s a table of dimensions to help you size up which might be best for you:
As you can see, the extra size on offer in the LWB model is strictly nose to tail, with no other compromises to consider apart from, understandably, the larger turning circle. But Mitsubishi claims even the smaller version can cope with two pallets in the back.
As for cargo zone dimensions, here’s how the two body styles compare:
It’s worth noting that there is no high-roof option available, where you can get a taller body in most competitor vans.
And while it is a bonus that there are barn doors (still not available on the HiAce), you can’t option a liftback tailgate. Plus, while the dual side sliding doors is an advantage as many OEMs charge extra for a driver’s side slider, you can’t option glazing for the rear door from Mitsubishi.
The company says that it is simply offering what it can get as part of the Alliance with Renault, but if you need to tailor a van to suit your specific needs, you might end up going with the French van (or the VW Transporter, which is the most configurable on the market).
Check the engine specs section below for more specs on weights and capacities. Next, let’s take a look at the cabin, starting with some interior images.
Externally the only visual differences between a HiLux BEV and its diesel SR5 equivalent are the BEV's solid front grille, a Type 2/CCS charging port for the propulsion battery located behind a hinged body flap on the front passenger side and aerodynamically-tuned 17-inch alloy wheels designed to minimise drag and optimise driving range. It also has unique rear suspension (see Motor).
The BEV variant has benefitted from the latest HiLux generation's exterior and interior styling updates in keeping this iconic workhorse looking fresh, particularly up front with its high slimline headlights, imposing body-coloured grille and trapezoidal side air intakes.
This more hard-edged look is also evident in the BEV's interior which although embracing new dash and centre console designs fortunately adheres to the time-proven practicality and user-friendliness of traditional 'piano key' buttons for its climate control plus a large dial for off-road drive settings (see Motor).
With a three-seater cabin as standard, the Express is already at an advantage over a HiAce. You can’t get a three-seat HiAce, and if you’ve got apprentices or workmates that always need a lift - but you don’t want the space sacrifice that comes with a crew van - it could be a crucial decision-maker for you.
And there are decent amenities for the occupants, too, with three cup holders and ample storage options across the dashboard, as well as large bottle holders in the doors. In fact, all told, Mitsubishi claims there is 43 litres of loose item storage in the cabin.
The driver’s seat gets manual height adjustment, lumbar adjustment and an armrest, as well as steering wheel rake and reach adjustment, so getting a comfortable driving position should be a cinch. Unlike the Trafic, there’s no driver’s seat heating option, but the clever “Load Through” cavity - for loading items up to 4.14m long - under the passenger seat is fitted on all models (but unlike the Trafic, which has a bulkhead, there’s no porthole, and the vehicles we tested with cargo cages didn’t have an opening to make the best use of this).
It’s set up for hard work, with rubber floor mats and a “hard wearing” poly trim on the steering wheel, though that finish is a bit coarse, and not as pleasant to hold as a leather wheel. The seat trim is fabric, and feels to be made of a durable material.
Ergonomically, it is no different to a Renault Trafic. Most important controls fall easily to hand, though people unfamiliar with Renault switchgear may need to pay attention at the dealership when the positioning of the cruise control and speed limiter buttons are explained. The buttons are between the dashboard and steering wheel.
And if you’re looking for the volume button, it’s on the weird little stalk behind the wheel itself. That has tuning and phone controls too, and it takes some getting used to. Further, if you’re used to the blinkers being on the “right” side of the steering wheel in Japanese cars, the Express is the exception.
When it comes to media and infotainment, there’s a lot left to be desired. There is no touch screen at all, and you can’t option one, either. Some drivers will appreciate that, but others will lament the lack of smartphone mirroring tech (Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), and likewise there is no sat nav available, either. There’s not even a CD player, but as standard the Express gets a smartphone holster with USB port on top of the dash, so there are two USB ports to keep things charged, plus a 12-volt below if you need it.
But the simple media system does offer a USB port to connect your phone or MP3 player, and Bluetooth phone and audio streaming, as well as DAB digital and AM/FM radio. The sound system has just two speakers, but it’s okay.
The cargo zone is, as you’d expect, a big, largely empty space. There’s no steel bulkhead option to separate the two zones, which could be frustrating for some customers - though if you can deal with the noise reverberation but just want to make sure things don’t fly from front to rear, there is a mesh cargo barrier available.
There are 14 tie-down points in the SWB (eight floor mount, six wall mount) and 16 tie eyelets in the LWB (10 floor, six wall). Plus there’s a rear-mount 12-volt outlet near the back doors to keep things charged.
Our test vehicle’s 2455kg kerb weight is 300kg more than its diesel sibling, which combined with its 3170kg GVM leaves a 715kg payload rating that’s 250kg lower.
The HiLux BEV is also rated to tow up to 2000kg of braked trailer (1500kg less than the diesel) and its 4670kg GCM rating (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) would leave just 215kg of payload capacity if towing its maximum trailer weight. This could easily be used up by two big tradies before you could add their tools, so it’s important to be aware of these load ratings if planning to tow.
tub, is equipped with anchorage points front and rear plus hydraulic tailgate dampers to assist opening and closing. Load tub access is made easier and safer by concave side-steps behind the rear wheels.
Like its diesel sibling, rear seating for tall people offers minimal knee/shoulder/head room, combined with a notably short distance between the top of the base cushion and floor creating a steep thigh angle that concentrates body weight on your lower back.
Driver and front passenger storage includes a bin and bottle holder in each door, cupholders on either side of the dash and upper and lower glove boxes. The centre console has wireless phone charging up front, two more cupholders in the centre and a lidded box at the back containing the V2L (Vehicle to Load) AC inverter with domestic three-pin plug and a 12V accessory socket.
Rear passengers get a bottle holder and bin in each door plus pockets on both front seat backrests, a fold-down centre armrest with two more cupholders plus two USB-C charging ports and adjustable air vents on the rear fascia of the centre console.
There’s no under-seat storage available and the vehicle’s portable AC charging cable, which is stored in a zip-up bag, has no dedicated storage area so must be carried on either the cabin floor or in the load tub.
Its starting price is cheaper than a VW Transporter, Hyundai iLoad, Toyota HiAce, Ford Transit Custom and Mercedes-Benz Vito. That could be all you need to know, but here’s the detailed info on the spec of the 2020 Mitsubishi Express range.
There is just one trim level - GLX - but it is available with two body lengths, short-wheelbase (SWB) and long-wheelbase (LWB), and a choice of two powertrains.
The 1.6-litre manual SWB model opens the line-up at $38,490 (RRP), while the 2.0-litre automatic SWB is a hefty $4000 more, at $42,490 (RRP). You can read more about the engines in the relevant section below, but just note those prices are before on-road costs, and therefore not driveaway deals. But keep in mind, Mitsubishi Australia promises “very competitive” fleet pricing.
Need a long-wheelbase model? You’ll have to stretch the budget by $2000. As such, the 1.6L manual LWB is $40,490 (RRP), while the 2.0L auto LWB costs $44,490 (RRP).
As mentioned, GLX is the trim level. But the 2.0-litre auto models get a bit more kit to justify their cost.
As standard on all models: 16-inch steel wheels with a full-size spare wheel, halogen headlights and daytime running lights, grained plastic bumpers, dual side sliding doors, barn doors at the rear, rear parking sensors, three-seat capacity, a stereo with Bluetooth phone and audio streaming plus two USB ports, a digital speedometer, cruise control with speed limiter, and single zone air conditioning.
The 2.0L auto models add a reversing camera which is integrated into an auto-dimming rearview mirror, plus rain-sensing wipers, dusk sensing headlights and front and rear fog lamps.
Interested in knowing what safety spec is standard, and what’s missing? Read the safety section below.
There are four colours to choose from, and they don’t have fancy names, either. You’ve got the no-cost options of White Solid and Red Solid, or the added-cost ($740) Silver Metallic or Black Metallic. If you want a bigger range of colours, be sure to have a look at the Ford Transit Custom, which has more than 100 options to choose from.
There is a range of accessories available as dealer-fit options as well, including: roof racks, roof rails, a roof platform with rear ladder, a cargo net, mesh cargo barrier, rubber floor mat for the load space, wooden panelling for the rear (floor, wall and wheel-arch), bumper protection, barn door protectors, a rear bumper step in galvanized steel, and towbar kits with or without electronic brake controllers. Ask your dealer for pricing.
The HiLux BEV range offers a choice of dual cab ute/dual cab-chassis in base SR model grade or the premium SR5 dual cab ute. Given its commercial fleet focus, exterior colours are limited to standard Glacier White or Frosted White/Ash Slate premium paint options.
Our SR5 test vehicle, like all HiLux BEVs, comes standard with a dual-motor 4x4 drivetrain and 59.2kWh lithium-ion propulsion battery for a list price of $82,990, before on-road costs. Its Ash Slate premium paint adds $675.
This list pricing is way above that of its SR5 48V diesel auto equivalent ($65,990) and its only full-electric ute rival in the form of KGM’s (formerly Ssangyong) Musso EV AWD ($64,000, drive-away).
For that sizeable spend the HiLux BEV’s standard equipment list contains unique features comprising a bespoke 12.3-inch driver’s digital cluster with EV instrumentation, an equally new electronic shift lever for the shift-by-wire BEV functionality plus exterior changes (see Design). Other standard equipment includes:
There are a couple of options available in the Express range.
Elect for a six-speed manual transmission and you get a 1.6-litre twin-turbo four-cylinder diesel engine producing 103kW of power (at 3500rpm) and 340Nm of torque (at 1500rpm).
Choose the six-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and the engine is a 2.0-litre four-cylinder single-turbo diesel motor, with 125kW of power (at 3500rpm) and 380Nm of torque (at 1500rpm). This engine meets a stricter emissions requirement than the other (Euro 6 vs Euro 5) because it has a 25-litre AdBlue urea treatment tank, though both have a diesel particulate filter (DPF), too. Depending on what side of the fence you sit, that’s either an advantage or an added cost and burden.
The Express is only available in front-wheel drive (FWD/2WD), so there’s no rear-wheel drive (RWD) or all-wheel drive (AWD/FWD) options available.
Of course, you’ll need to consider weight if you’re buying a van like this. And it comes down to more than just engine specs - you need to consider payload, towing specifications, gross vehicle mass (GVM) and gross combination mass (GCM).
Here’s a table with the figures you need to know:
Wanting a petrol, hybrid, electric, plug-in hybrid or gas version of the Express? No can do… well, not in Australia, and not yet.
You will have to stay tuned for our full-scale Tradie Review on the Mitsubishi Express, where we will load it up to its GVM limit. But for day-to-day driving impressions, see the driving section below.
The HiLux BEV is equipped with two electric motors delivering full-time four-wheel drive. The front motor drives the front wheels and produces 82.2kW of power and 205.5Nm of torque. The more powerful rear motor driving the rear wheels produces 129.3kW and 268.6Nm.
Combined maximum power output is officially rated at 144kW but there’s no official combined torque figure given that the electric motors produce their peak torque at different times.
These motors drive the wheels through chassis-mounted transaxles equipped with single-speed transmissions. They are synchronised electronically using ‘fly-by-wire’ accelerator and gear/mode selection.
The centre console-mounted shifter controls conventional drive selections (Park, Drive, Reverse) plus offers a ‘B’ setting for optimum regenerative braking, to minimise brake pedal use and maximise battery charging.
Its full-time 4x4 system automatically distributes torque on demand between the front and rear wheels according to traction sensors. The driver can choose between three drive modes (Normal, Sport and Eco) and has access to a multi-terrain system (MTS) which optimises traction in different terrain across six settings including Auto, Dirt, Sand, Mud, Mogul and Snow.
The strengthened chassis frame provides protection for the propulsion battery mounted between the main rails. Toyota claims the battery subframe has been designed for flexibility to tolerate high levels of torsional twist when off-roading. It features a full undercover to protect high voltage parts from water splash or other damage and shares the same 700mm wading depth as the diesel version.
HiLux BEV also features a unique De Dion-type (rigid hollow beam axle) leaf spring rear suspension, with the transaxle mounted on the chassis frame to reduce unsprung weight and the beam axle with traditional leaf springs allowing efficient load carrying and off-road performance.
Fuel consumption for the Mitsubishi Express depends on the engine/transmission combination you choose.
The 1.6-litre twin-turbo manual version is the more frugal according to official combined cycle consumption figures, at 6.2 litres per 100 kilometres. Opt for the 2.0-litre single-turbo auto and the fuel consumption is claimed at 7.3 litres per 100 kilometres.
Those figures are based on a driving loop that doesn’t incorporate loaded testing, so you can expect your real world consumption to be higher - but even so, the claims are lower than the likes of the HiAce (7.5L diesel manual, 8.2L diesel auto).
On test, for instance, I saw a return of 7.9L/100km in the SWB auto, which experienced a few traffic snarls in Sydney. The LWB auto with 200kg of ballast over the rear axle - in which I did 100km of mixed urban, interurban and freeway driving with free flowing traffic for the most part - had a displayed return of 7.8L100km.
The fuel tank capacity is large, at 80 litres. That means theoretically excellent range on a single tank - up to 1290km if you can manage the claimed consumption in the manual model.
The HiLux BEV has an official driving range of up to 315km based on the optimistic NEDC combined cycle test procedure.
When we collected our test vehicle the propulsion battery charge was at 100 per cent but the displayed estimated driving range was 272km.
We initially drove 84km unladen in metro traffic (using only Normal/Eco drive modes and max regen braking) with average combined energy consumption of 28.3kWh/100km, which was way above the sub-20kWh/100km figure needed to crack the claimed 300km-plus of driving range.
After recharging to 100 per cent for our GVM test, the estimated driving range dropped to 266km. On this second charge we drove another 173km, of which more than 100km was hauling a full payload which saw a spike in energy consumption to 31kWh/100km. We finished our test with 19 per cent charge and 50km of driving range remaining.
Our total test distance was 258km during which we achieved average energy consumption of 27.8kWh/100km. Therefore, based on our consumption figure, you could expect a driving range in real-world urban use of around 200-220km.
Toyota claims a 10-80 per cent charge time of approximately 30 minutes using a (150kW) DC fast charger or 10-100 per cent in about 6.5 hours using (10kW) AC charging.
If you’ve never driven a modern-day mid-size (2.5-3.5 tonne) van, you will be amazed at their road manners. There’s not a bad one in the class, in round terms, and the Express builds upon the Renault Trafic’s reputation as being among the best in the class for comfort and drivability.
It really is a pretty sweet appliance, with a ride quality that is mostly excellent whether you’re in the SWB or LWB model. It offers decent comfort and control at low speeds and high speeds, and is really only upset when the potholes are deep or have sharp edges.
The SWB model has a slightly more pitchy ride when unladen, but we didn’t get a chance to put any weight in it just yet. The LWB model had 200kg of ballast over the rear axle, and that weight - combined with the extra 400mm of wheelbase - made for a very comfortable drive. Not too mushy or slushy, but actually nicely cushy.
Aside from the low-speed electric whirring sound from the power steering, the steering is terrific - it is nicely weighted and pivots well, even the LWB model. Sure, it definitely feels its size, but it’s easily manageable and surprisingly agile for such a big rig, and easy enough to park as well, thanks to the split side mirrors and reversing camera (which pops up in the rear-view mirror and is quite small, but there are rear parking sensors to help out, too).
Because I sampled both automatic models, that meant I only had the chance to sample the 2.0-litre four-cylinder single-turbo diesel engine - and it’s a very strong performer.
I never once felt like I needed any more pulling power with this - admittedly small - amount of weight on board.
And the dual-clutch transmission is decent as well. You get away from a standing start pretty well, with just a little bit of turbo and transmission lag to contend with. It’s never annoying, even in traffic jam drudgery - unless the engine start stop system activates, and then it can be a little bit sluggish to get moving again.
However, as is the case with plenty of dual-clutch transmissions in commercial vehicles, it’s not quite as measured or linear in its progress when there’s no load on-board, tending to lurch away a little more when unladen.
And while we were hardly pushing the GVM limits with only 200kg in the back, the brake pedal of the LWB did feel at times like the push was a little longer than it should have been.
It is a decently refined van, especially considering there’s no steel bulkhead to shield you from the noise intrusion at the rear. One thing, though - our test vans both had optional rubber mats fitted, and they were quite odorous.
As mentioned the visibility is pretty decent, but I couldn’t help but feel jealous of a HiAce I overtook that had its blind-spot monitoring system flicker on the mirror. It would just add a little bit of extra piece of mind, as there’s no vision over your shoulder, and if you do have a load in the back it’s hard to see in the rearview mirror. And unlike other vans in the market, you can’t option rear windows, either.
It also rides and handles much like its diesel stablemate. The most noticeable differences are the smooth yet energetic power delivery and the near silence of its drivetrain, with most cabin noise coming from the tyres which is also far from intrusive.
Near instant torque from its dual electric motors provides lively response for a vehicle of this size and weight. While it doesn’t nail your eyeballs to the back of your head like some EVs, it does provide spirited acceleration from standing starts and takes less than 10 seconds to reach triple-digit speeds.
To test its GVM rating we forklifted 650kg into the load tub which with driver was lineball with its peak payload rating. The leaf-spring rear suspension only compressed about 40mm under this weight leaving ample bump-stop clearance that ensured no bottoming-out on our test route.
In true HiLux tradition, the ride quality noticeably improved and the chassis and drivetrain were more than capable of hauling this payload on a variety of roads. Overall, it’s a competent load hauler like its diesel stablemate, albeit always with an eye on the battery charge given its limited range.
At the time of writing there is no ANCAP crash test rating for the Mitsubishi Express. In fact, no safety authority on the planet has done a crash test score on the new-generation model - but the Renault Trafic on which it is based copped a nasty three-star score in Euro NCAP testing back in 2015. Ouch.
The Express doesn’t have an overly generous safety offering. No model is equipped or available with autonomous emergency braking (AEB), nor lane departure warning, lane keeping assistance, blind spot monitoring, front or rear cross traffic alert, or rear AEB. It’s sparse. There is a blind-spot mirror on the passenger side sun visor, but it’s not nearly as effective as a sensor.
You do get a reversing camera fitted as standard in the auto models, but not the manual variants (and it’s a rearview mirror for the autos) - even the extremely affordable LDV G10 has a reversing camera range-wide. Auto models also score rain sensing auto wipers, auto headlights and an auto-dimming rearview mirror, while manuals miss out on all of that good stuff.
Reversing sensors are standard range-wide, as is stability control with rollover mitigation, ABS, Electronic Brakeforce Distribution with load sensing, hill start assist and Emergency Stop Signal (flashing tail-lights under hard braking). There’s also an Extended Grip driving mode, which allows the van to better manage available traction on slippery surfaces.
The airbag count is odd, too, at five: you get dual front airbags, curtain airbags for both sides, but only a side airbag on the driver’s side.
For a brand-new van, the safety spec is frankly disappointing, and goes against Mitsubishi’s strides in its other models in its range, where it often has class-leading or equivalent safety tech.
Want a better equipped van when it comes to safety technology? Check out the Toyota HiAce, Mercedes-Benz Vito and Ford Transit Custom, all of which leave the Express (and Trafic) in the dust.
Our test vehicle comes standard with a five-star ANCAP rating (tested 2025) and a suite of passive and active safety features including:
The HiLux BEV's advanced Active Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) display good refinement in terms of not being overly intrusive or reactive during normal driving, in stark contrast to some rivals equipped with often annoying (and ironically distracting!) driver distraction monitors.
Mitsubishi is constantly dabbling in the long warranty promotional deals, but the standard warranty on offer for the Express is five years/100,000km.
The brand also has a capped price servicing plan for the first three years/45,000km of ownership. With intervals set at 12 months/15,000km, the costs are low, at $250 per visit.
And if you service your van with Mitsubishi’s dealer network, you will also get roadside assistance for up to four years.
If you’re wondering how that compares with the Renault plan? It’s a three-year/unlimited km warranty (but promotional five year/200,000km warranty plans are available until 31 August 2020). The Trafic has capped price servicing every 12 months or 30,000km intervals, or as determined by the oil sensor, at $599 per visit - but as of July 1 2020, it spans five years/150,000km, and is available with up to five years’ roadside assistance when maintained in-network.
You might be curious about Mitsubishi Express problems - but it could be worth taking a look at the Renault Trafic problems page to find out if there have been issues around reliability, engine or transmission problems, recalls and common complaints.
The HiLux BEV comes standard with a five-year/unlimited km warranty and separate five-year warranty covering the propulsion battery which can be extended for up to five years (so 10 years in total) with an annual battery health check. The propulsion battery is also covered by an eight-year/160,000km capacity warranty if its energy storage falls below 70 per cent of the original capacity.
Scheduled servicing is every six months/10,000km with capped pricing of $220 per scheduled service for the first five years (or 10 services in total).
The company has a vast network of more than 275 dealerships across Australia including all states and territories and many regional areas.