Mercedes-Benz Evito vs MG Cyberster

What's the difference?

It’s arguably the best-looking mid-size van on the market, particularly with the optional enhancements fitted to our example. And its longer (km-based) service intervals and capped-price servicing costs offer substantial savings compared to a diesel Vito equivalent.

However, the eVito has a much higher purchase price, smaller payload, shorter driving range, can’t tow a trailer and feels a tad under-powered at low speeds. Plus filling its battery with fresh charge takes much longer than filling a tank with diesel, which may or may not be an issue depending on planned usage.

Therefore, a buyer would need to have not only a sizeable purchasing budget but also very specific and resolute criteria for this vehicle to shine in a commercial role.

The Cyberster is certainly an impressive thing in a lot of ways, but if you were expecting a perfect sports car from MG, you'll be a bit disappointed. 

It's quite expensive if you're looking for a nice EV, but on the flip side it's quite cheap if being fast is your main concern.

If anything, the Cyberster is an exciting look at what the brand is capable of, even if it's a bit rough around the edges.

The eVito’s front-mounted electric motor drives the front wheels. Its lithium-ion battery is located beneath the standard Vito floor to ensure load volume is not reduced. This substantial battery is as wide as the load floor and extends from just behind the front wheels to just ahead of the rears. Its charging port is located behind a spring-loaded body flap ahead of the left front wheel.

It rides on a 3200mm wheelbase with 5140mm overall length, 1928mm width and a kerb-to-kerb 13-metre turning circle, with 1916mm height allowing access to underground and multi-storey carparks. It’s equipped with strut-type front suspension, semi-trailing arm/coil spring rear suspension and four-wheel disc brakes.

MG reckons the Cyberster draws on the proportions of classic roadsters like its MG A and B from the ‘50s and ‘60s.

And I reckon that’s about where the comparison ends, really.

But don’t get me wrong, I think it’s got some pretty angles and nice elements.

It’s got the long bonnet, but its cabin isn't set so far back and its aerodynamic lines and curves probably weren't a priority back then either.

This is the standard colour, English White, which is more like off-white or cream or beige.

You can have a red roof on the lighter colours, white, silver, and grey, but red and yellow Cybersters have black ones.

The tail-lights at the back were inspired by the union jack, but they’re probably one of the elements on this car I'd put in the ‘tacky’ column.

With its hefty 2318kg kerb weight and 3200kg GVM, the eVito has an 882kg payload rating. That is 183kg less than a diesel equivalent (119 Vito MWB RWD), given that the eVito is around 300kg heavier than the ICE version largely because of its battery.

And unlike the diesel alternative, which is legally rated to tow up to 2500kg of braked trailer, the eVito has no tow rating, which is consistent with other electric vans we’ve tested and a potential deal-breaker for tradies.

The cargo bay offers a competitive 6.0 cubic metres of load volume and is accessed through sliding doors on each side (822mm openings), with large internal assist-handles on the bulkhead. Rear cargo bay access is through a swing-up tailgate, which can limit the use of forklifts not fitted with extendable tynes. All doors and walls are internally lined.

The load area is 2678mm long, 1709mm wide and 1392mm high. With 1270mm between the rear-wheel housings, it can carry two 1165mm-square Aussie pallets or up to three 1200 x 800mm Euro pallets, secured by eight sturdy load-anchorage points.

The cabin bulkhead has a cavernous open storage area at its base which is handy for storing ropes, straps etc. The upper section of the bulkhead protrudes about 20cm into the openings of the side sliding doors which may obstruct loading of large items.

Cabin storage includes a large-bottle holder and bin in the base of each door, with smaller bins at mid-height. There’s also an overhead glasses holder, two cupholders and three open bins across the top of the dash, a single glovebox and a hidden compartment beneath the passenger seat which is handy for storing small items or valuables out of sight.

A three-screen dash sounds a little daunting at first, but it’s not that far from the giant screens in some new cars now.

The central 10.25-inch screen is info only, while the flanking 7.0-inch screens are touchscreens, as is the climate control screen in the console.

As much as I’m a fan of physical buttons where possible, this car shows that multiple screens means you don’t need many sub-menus.

Basically, this feels like a lot, but you get used to it relatively quickly.

And while it also seems like MG’s software has become more intuitive and less laggy, the placements of the screens is a little annoying - the side screens on the dash are blocked by the steering wheel, and the central touchscreen is a bit fiddly.

Like I mentioned, no wireless phone mirroring is a let-down and there’s not really an obvious place to put a phone, but the ability to level out the cup holders is kind of interesting and the central storage where the USB-A and C ports are is big enough.

There’s a narrow bit of storage behind the seats, but the boot is actually 249 litres and seems much more usable than you might expect.

It's also worth noting the Cyberster comes with an AC slow charging cable as standard, but not a DC fast-charging cable for plugging in at some charging stations.

The MG Cyberster finds itself here as the only electric convertible sports car on offer, which means it’s hard to compare its $115,000 price tag to any direct rivals.

The Kia EV6 GT and Hyundai Ioniq 5 N are the wrong shape, the Porsche Cayman has the wrong running gear and most other things with doors like this are a lot more expensive.

So what does $115,000, before on-road costs, get you?

It’s only available in one variant, with pretty much the only cost-option being paint colours.

Aside from the scissor doors, there’s the electric folding roof, triple-screen cockpit with another centre panel, an eight-speaker Bose sound system, heated electric seats and steering wheel, and ambient lighting.

The exterior lights are all automatic intelligent LEDs, and you can open the doors with the key fob.

It is, however, missing a couple of things.

No phone charger might be down to space, but no wireless phone mirroring is a bit annoying, and the manual steering wheel adjustment feels a little cheap in a six-figure EV.

The eVito’s single electric motor drives the front wheels via a single-speed transmission. It produces 85kW of power and 360Nm of torque from the energy stored in its 60kWh battery.

Using the steering wheel paddles, drivers can switch between five energy-recuperation modes to optimise battery range and reduce manual brake use. These range from D- (strongest deceleration/recuperation) through D, D+ and D++ which progressively reduce these effects. DAuto uses a radar sensor to automatically adjust the recuperation level according to surrounding traffic.

There are also three switchable drive modes comprising E+, E and C, which allow drivers a choice of energy consumption/performance levels.

Okay, here’s where the Cyberster gets impressive.

Its dual-motor set-up combines a 150kW front motor and a 250kW rear motor for a total of 375kW.

Peak torque is a hefty 725Nm.

All that is enough to get you and two tonnes of MG from zero to 100km/h in 3.2 seconds.

Sure it tops out at 208km/h, but the rush of hitting highway speeds is already enough to put your licence at risk.

The MG Cyberster has a 77kWh battery and a claimed efficiency of 19.1kWh/100km.

While that means its claimed driving range of 443km relies on a bit of energy to be recuperated from braking, something you don’t really get on the highway, it actually works in the car’s favour during dynamic driving.

After 264km of driving on a test loop that included some urban but mostly highway and rural driving, the Cyberster’s trip computer displayed a 19.4kWh/100km average consumption.

The battery sat at 27 per cent, with 108km estimated range remaining.

While 443km of total range seems optimistic for a car that’s likely to be driven relatively quickly a lot of the time, the efficiency of the Cyberster held up better than you might have expected.

It’s easy to get comfortable given the height/reach adjustable leather-wrapped wheel and powered multiple seat adjustments, which include base cushion rake and height/reach lumbar support. The base cushion can also be manually extended for more under-thigh support by sliding the front section forward.

There’s good eyelines to the door mirrors and, thanks to the large window in the cabin bulkhead, the central rear-view mirror has an unobstructed view through the tailgate window. The passenger-side mirror’s wide-angle view, combined with active blind-spot monitoring, help to minimise the large blind-spot over the driver’s left shoulder that all solid-walled vans share.

Steering is nicely weighted and communicative, unladen ride quality is supple thanks to its four-coil suspension, and four-wheel disc brakes provided reassuringly strong braking response. However, there was also noticeable tyre noise intrusion at speeds above 60km/h on coarse bitumen surfaces.

Acceleration from standing starts feels leisurely at best, even when using full power. This is when the eVito’s 2.3-tonne kerb weight is noticeable, which is not surprising when you compare its weight-to-power and weight-to-torque ratios with a diesel Vito (MWB) equivalent.

For example, based on kerb weights, the 119 CDI Panel Van (140kW/440Nm) has to move 14.2kg/kW and 4.5kg/Nm compared to the eVito’s much heavier 27.3kg/kW and 6.4kg/Nm.

However, the power delivery is seamless and once up to cruising speeds the response noticeably improves, fortunately in the 60-80km/h range where much city and suburban travel occurs. The key to fluent progress in traffic is maintaining momentum.

To test its load-hauling ability, we inflated the tyres to the recommended pressures and forklifted 650kg into the cargo bay through the side doors. Combined with driver and equipment, this equalled a 750kg (three-quarter-tonne) payload which was about 130kg short of its maximum rating.

With the cargo bay load positioned well ahead of the rear wheels, the rear suspension only compressed 25mm with no risk of bottoming-out over bumps.

Our 50km test route comprised mostly city and suburban routes (for which this vehicle is tailored) plus some highway driving. There wasn’t a noticeable drop in handling, braking or ride quality with this payload, although standing-start acceleration felt more subdued as you'd expect.

There’s good news and bad news about the Cyberster from behind the wheel.

The good news is it’s quite easy to drive this thing very fast. 

The bad news is it feels like it would be quite easy to get sick of as a day-to-day car, depending on your situation.

The first thing I noticed is the seat feels a bit high, even at its lowest setting. That's likely due to the placement of the battery pack under the floor of of the car.

Following that, if you’re taller than me (I'm five foot 11), it feels like the wrong road surface will have you nudging your head into the roof liner.

That mechanical roof should take about 15 seconds to lower or raise, and that can be done at speeds up to 50km/h.

It could be a symptom of trying to keep 1985kg tied down, but some of Melbourne's highways and arterial roads between 70 and 100km/h had the Cyberster bobbing quite a bit.

But the suspension doesn't let individual bumps intrude too much into the cabin, so it’s not all bad.

Similarly, there’s good and bad when it comes to the steering and braking.

The first being that the steering seems pretty accurate, even though the feedback is a bit numb. 

The braking on the other hand is handled by some pretty capable Brembos up front that pull the heavy roadster up quickly, but don’t always clamp as hard as you might expect when approaching a traffic light at 60km/h.

But stopping’s one thing, and going’s another.

There are three main drive modes, Comfort, Sport, and Super Sport, which mainly alter the acceleration intensity. And they feel well calibrated.

Comfort keeps things calm and cruisy, Sport is plenty for the road, and Super Sport has the potential to draw the attention of the authorities.

There’s good adjustability when it comes to regen braking, and even a decent single-pedal driving mode.

Aside from a couple of particularly heinous roads, the Cyberster held mostly flat when cornering at high speeds, but the potential for its suspension to let its wheels lose their footing might - or should - stop you from pushing the MG too hard.

At high speeds, there’s a bit of wind noise that you really can’t complain about if you’ve just purchased a drop-top, but the noise, vibration and harshness is decent, all things considered.

My only gripe with the interior fit out is that the passenger seat wobbles a little, and rattles on the surface behind it before moving it forward.

It’s impressive what this car can do in terms of performance, it’s just a shame it’s not more playful.

The Cyberster hasn’t been tested by ANCAP but as a niche sports car, it may never get tested.

The good news is it rides on the same platform as the MG4, which has five stars.

It’s got frontal and side airbags, plus all the usual new-car tech like adaptive cruise, lane-keep assist, blind spot warnings, collision warnings and avoidance, and speed limit warnings.

The Cyberster’s active safety is actually mercifully restrained, giving a couple of relatively quiet dings when exceeding the limit before you turn it off, letting you do the steering even when lane-keep is on, and in my case, only giving me a driver attention alert when I yawned while at a red light.

The eVito has a five-year/250,000km vehicle warranty with an eight-year/160,000km battery warranty and a 24-hour roadside assist support package. Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/40,000km whichever occurs first. Capped pricing for first five scheduled services totals $2432 or an appealing average of $486 per service.

MG has a 10-year/250,000km warranty that’s pretty impressive by industry standards, and the warranty also covers its EVs.

It’s important to note that the convertible roof is one of a few items (including 12-volt batteries and light bulbs) that MG covers for less than 10 years. In the case of the roof it’s only five.

It’s worth closely reading the fine print before you crack into buying a car, regardless.

There are also ten capped-price services which occur every 12 months or 25,000km, ranging from $246 to $785. The average price per service is $503.40.

MG also offers free roadside assist for the period of the warranty.