Mercedes-Benz Evito vs Kia EV9

What's the difference?

It’s arguably the best-looking mid-size van on the market, particularly with the optional enhancements fitted to our example. And its longer (km-based) service intervals and capped-price servicing costs offer substantial savings compared to a diesel Vito equivalent.

However, the eVito has a much higher purchase price, smaller payload, shorter driving range, can’t tow a trailer and feels a tad under-powered at low speeds. Plus filling its battery with fresh charge takes much longer than filling a tank with diesel, which may or may not be an issue depending on planned usage.

Therefore, a buyer would need to have not only a sizeable purchasing budget but also very specific and resolute criteria for this vehicle to shine in a commercial role.

Whether you think the EV9 GT is an over-priced mistake or the logical next step for a brand looking to move up in the world will depend on your point-of-view.

Kia has certainly extended the appeal of the EV9 range, but possibly in the wrong direction. Certainly the wrong direction if the goal is to add significantly more sales.

A cheaper alternative to the $97,000 EV9 Air would likely be a more popular choice from the point-of-view of Australian families considering replacing their diesel-powered SUVs with something that doesn’t rely on the chaotic fuel market. 

But that’s not really who the EV9 GT will appeal to. Instead, from the point-of-view of someone looking at a more expensive European option, whether it be an Audi Q8 e-tron, BMW iX or something else, the EV9 GT may be appealing in a very different way - assuming that they aren't driven by what badge is on the front.

Kia has certainly evolved beyond its ‘cheap and cheerful’ image or buying primarily for its long warranty. These days Kia is a mainstream brand, but whether it has enhanced its reputation enough to attract buyers willing to spend more than $130,000 will be decided in the showroom.