What's the difference?
If you’re in the market for a city- and family-friendly compact SUV, you’re in luck.
The small SUV segment is one of the most heavily populated and hotly contested in the Aussie new-car market and the Mazda CX-30 G25 GT SP FWD is pitched against a seething pack of at least 10 similarly sized, generously specified and highly-credentialed competitors.
So, stay with us on a mission to determine whether this high-end version of one of Mazda’s best sellers is worthy of a spot on your new-car short list.
There’s nothing quite like the Mercedes-Benz GLB. It’s a smallish mid-size SUV with a third seating row (strictly for small children… ), it has a distinctive boxy shape, and for the second generation, you can have a mild-hybrid or fully-electric powertrain. It is the definition of versatile.
The previous GLB was petrol only and Mercedes also offered the similar looking EQB as part of its EQ electric sub-brand. The separate EV model strategy wasn’t working so the German carmaker followed rival BMW’s plan of simply offering electric versions of popular models. Hence the two powertrain options for the new GLB.
This time around Benz has sharpened up pricing, added a bunch of new tech, and developed a new vehicle architecture, while retaining what buyers loved about the original.
Is the new-gen GLB a success?
About to enter its fifth year in market the Mazda CX-30 is holding up well and this GT SP FWD grade delivers solid value relative to its key competitors, of which there are many. It’s also space-efficient, practical and performs well with top-shelf safety, decent refinement and good dynamic ability.
Alternately, it’s crying out for a hybrid powertrain to improve fuel efficiency, the interior form and function is starting to date and while it meets the market the ownership promise could be sharper. But this little SUV is still worthy of a spot on your new-car short list.
The new GLB is a worthy successor to the original. It has retained everything that made it such a unique proposition but improves where it counts - interior space and comfort, in-car and safety tech, standard features, powertrain, ride quality and, importantly, value-for-money.
The EV is the pick of the powertrains and while I didn’t get to drive it, the GLB250+ is the best value.
Servicing is expensive and the standard glass roof is a bugbear but if you can cope with those things, the boxy GLB is a terrific smallish family SUV.
Mazda continues to follow a disciplined design path with everything from the MX-5 sports car to the BT-50 dual-cab ute sharing key attributes like the brand’s signature trapezoidal grille, simple flowing lines and sleek head- and tail-lights, all wrapped up with a subtle hint of chrome here and there.
Car-spotters with the GT SP on their checklist should look out for 18-inch black metallic rims as well as black exterior trim, including the mirror caps.
Inside, the CX-30 maintains Mazda’s restrained approach with smooth surfaces integrated across the multi-layer dash and primo leather-trimmed seats.
That said, this car is starting to show its age with the multimedia screen plonked on the top of the dash (in typical Mazda fashion) and a largely conventional instrument cluster.
Yes, the main dial is configurable courtesy of a central 7.0-inch TFT screen, but next to more recent arrivals boasting sleek, often twinned, flat screen displays the CX-30 looks and feels out of touch.
Functionally, there’s a sensible mix of digital controls and physical buttons (points for audio volume and ventilation dials!), but… the multimedia screen can only be accessed by a rotary controller in the centre console once the car is mobile (it works as a touchscreen when you’re stationary).
Some say touchscreens take your eyes off the road so the controller makes sense, but with a sequential app like Spotify it can take a lot of twirls to get to where you want to go, which upsets concentration and takes your eyes off the road, anyway. I’d prefer the relative ease of a quick press on a screen.
Aside from all that, the materials used are high quality with soft-touch surfaces across key contact points and hard plastics confined to high-wear areas.
The original first-generation GLB was a standout when it comes to exterior design. It was boxy, upright and unlike anything else in the premium SUV segment. If you wanted a conventional Mercedes SUV you could opt for the smaller, bubble-shaped GLA or the larger, more sophisticated GLC.
But the GLB occupied its own space. Thankfully Benz has largely stuck with the script for the second-gen GLB, but they’ve modernised it.
Built on the new Mercedes Modular Architecture (MMA), the GLB is a full 98mm longer, has a 50mm longer wheelbase, is 27mm wider and 14mm shorter. And it does look noticeably lower to the ground compared to the old model.
While the square silhouette remains, Benz’s latest design direction is seen everywhere. The front end is more rounded now and has a large gaping low-set grille with an LED light bar running the width of the bonnet. It’s an acquired taste but I prefer the previous GLB face.
The rear is a much better angle for the GLB. Looking at it directly from the rear, it has pronounced shoulders that give it a lovely muscular look, and the curved tail-lights are a highlight.
Benz is leaning into its brand in a bid to stand out in an increasingly competitive global market. It’s doing this by using the iconic three-pointed star as a motif in the head and tail-light cluster, as well as the grille which is illuminated for some grades. I’m not sold on that element as it feels a bit over the top, but at least you won’t get confused about what brand of car it is.
Another design element I’m not sold on is the pop-out door handles. With car companies finding better solutions for handles, this seems out of touch.
Inside, everything feels upright. The integrated glass dash panel spans the width of the cabin, while brushed aluminium panels also feature. The signature Benz seat adjuster switches on the doors and the gorgeous air vent design have been upgraded successfully.
The three-spoke leather steering wheel in the GLB350 is a highlight - it’s the perfect width and well executed.
Overall the design is modern, tech focussed and very Benz.
At just under 4.4m long, close to 1.8m wide and little over 1.5m tall (with a 2655mm wheelbase) the CX-30 is in the middle of the pack it competes with in terms of key dimensions.
And space up front is more than adequate, with an impressive feeling of roominess for a relatively small SUV.
For storage, there’s a large lidded box (which doubles as an armrest) between the front seats as well as a pair of cupholders in front of the gear-shifter with a bay for wireless device charging ahead of that.
The glove box is big, there are bins in the doors with room for decent size bottles and a drop-down tray for sunglasses sits overhead.
Move to the rear and the amount of space on offer is surprisingly generous. Sitting behind the driver’s seat, set for my 183cm position, I have plenty of head and legroom, although three full-size adults across the back seat will be an uncomfortable proposition for anything other than short trips. A trio of up to mid-teenage kids will be fine.
Adjustable air vents at the back of the front centre console are a welcome inclusion for back-seaters and storage runs to a map pocket (weirdly, on the back of the front seat only), a pair of cupholders in the fold-down centre armrest and bins in the doors with room for smaller bottles.
In-cabin power and connectivity includes two USB-C outlets and a 12-volt socket in the front centre storage box. No USBs specifically for those in the rear, which is a miss for road trips and no 12V in the boot which can be handy when camping or picnicking.
Speaking of the boot, cargo volume with the rear seat upright is okay for the class at 317 litres, which expands to a healthy 1479L with the 60/40 split-folding backrest lowered. For comparison the Kia Seltos coughs up 433L with the rear seat upright.
The space is illuminated, there are tie-down anchors to help secure loose loads and there’s a space-saver spare sitting under the floor.
And if you’re keen on towing a tinnie or similar you’re good to go for a 1200kg braked trailer (600kg unbraked).
The extra length and width means more cabin space which is more apparent in the rear. But there is ample space up front, especially headroom.
The centre console sits up a little too high for my liking but it means you have under console storage with two USB-C ports, and a rubber mat so your phone doesn’t slide around.
It’s got a really deep central bin, while door cavities will only hold smaller bottles. You also get a wireless charger and two cupholders.
There is only a handful of buttons - hazard lights, volume, voice command and drive mode selection - under the central air vents. All other functions are found in the multimedia screen.
Benz has been a standout in the past decade with its MBUX multimedia system and the latest version is responsive, relatively easy to navigate (once you’ve located the key controls), and the graphics look super sharp and cool. The digital instrument cluster is similarly excellent.
Hopping into the second row, the seat base is set higher than the front seats for stadium seating. The seats have some bolstering but quite a lot of lumbar support.
There’s ample space in the second row, thanks to 68mm more space from the back of the seat to the front seat and an extra 34mm of headroom compared to the old car. I have ample knee, head and legroom behind my 183cm (six-foot) tall driving position, although my head is about the same height as the top of the window frame which impedes a little.
Amenities include smallish map pockets, two USB-C ports and knee-level air vents, which is always good to see. There’s a deep but skinny bottle holder on either side and a fold-down centre armrest that sits up a bit too high but it’s wide and has two shallow cupholders and a neat little phone holder.
Each of the 40/20/40 split seats folds via a pull strap at the seat base and the good news is you can adjust the second row backrest a little. The base is also on rails so it can slide fore and aft.
That is how you lower the seats to get into the third row, which is strictly for children. Benz has made it slightly easier for littlies to get back there but it is not a space for taller humans. In fact, Benz recommends up to 171cm tall at most.
One gripe is that there is no sunshade or blind for the massive standard panoramic fixed glass roof. Benz says it is tinted and has a film to reduce UV light and heat, but I’d say a few hours driving in Australian summer will challenge that. Benz isn’t the only brand doing this, but at least you can buy an accessory blind for your Polestar or Tesla. The fact is, not everyone wants a glass roof, especially in Australia, so this feature should be an option.
The boot can swallow 145 litres with all three rows up, increasing to 480L with the third row stowed and 1605L will all seats lowered. This is all decent for a smallish seven seater but if boot space is a priority then maybe have a look at a GLC.
There’s a floor mat and cargo blind but sadly no spare wheel of any kind, just a tyre repair kit, which isn’t great.
The Mazda CX-30 G25 GT SP FWD weighs in at $43,140, before on-road costs and our test example features the optional ‘Vision Pack’, the details of which we’ll get to shortly, raising the price $1300 to $44,440.
Alternate options around that price point include the Hyundai Kona Premium N Line 2WD ($42,500), Kia Seltos GT-Line FWD ($41,850), Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Exceed 2WD ($40,990), Honda HR-V e:HEV L 2WD ($42,900, drive-away), Nissan Qashqai ST-L FWD ($42,690), Peugeot 2008 GT FWD ($44,490), Renault Arkana Techno FWD ($41,000), Suzuki S-Cross Plus FWD ($41,490), Toyota C-HR 2WD GXL Hybrid ($42,990) and Volkswagen T-Roc Style FWD ($40,590).
That’s quite the automotive smorgasbord, the resulting price and specification cage fight meaning every included feature counts and the Mazda heads into battle with some significant weapons in hand.
Specifically, dual-zone climate control, a head-up display, a 10.25-inch ‘widescreen’ multimedia display, 7.0-inch driver’s multi-information display, 12-speaker Bose audio (with digital radio), wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, ‘Burgundy’ leather seat trim, heated front seats, leather trim on the gearshift and heated steering wheel, wireless phone charging, power-adjustable driver’s seat (with memories), a glass power tilt and slide sunroof and a power tailgate.
There’s also adaptive auto LED headlights, 18-inch black metallic alloy wheels, radar cruise control (with stop/go), a reversing camera, auto-fold (and tilt) heated exterior mirrors and keyless entry and start.
It’s an impressive and competitive equipment list for a small SUV under $45K, even before we get to the performance and safety tech covered later in the review.
The 2026 GLB line-up includes two mild-hybrid and two EV model grades, for now. We can probably expect a spicier AMG version down the track.
Things kick off with the GLB200 front-wheel drive mild-hybrid at $65,400, before on-road costs. This is $2200 cheaper than the previous 200.
Next up is the GLB220 4Matic, which is Benz speak for all-wheel drive. That costs $76,100.
The most affordable EV is the rear-wheel drive GLB250+ at $74,990 which is about $10,000 more than the base hybrid. It’s also about $14,000 more affordable than the previous equivalent EQB grade. Clearly Mercedes has seen the shift in the market and adjusted its prices accordingly.
The range tops out with the GLB350 4Matic at $86,200.
It’s tricky to compare the GLB to other mid-size SUVs as it occupies a fairly rare space given its boxy shape, two powertrain options and seven-seat layout.
A base BMW X3 mild-hybrid is $20,000 pricier than the entry GLB, while Volvo’s EX60 EV will start from $87,000. But they only have five seats each.
Interestingly, a Tesla Model Y L with six seats is $74,900 - just $90 cheaper than the GLB250+. You could argue, however, that Tesla is not a premium brand.
Standard gear in the GLB200 includes:
Step up to the GLB220 4Matic and you’ll also get:
The GLB250+ EV comes with everything you get in the two mild-hybrid grades but also gets a seven-metre home/public charging cable.
The flagship GLB350 4Matic gains the Terrain mode and transparent bonnet of the other 4Matic grade, as well as a second motor and a bump in power and torque.
The tech offering is very impressive and makes up the majority of the standard features list. It’s an extensive list and there’s a lot more when it comes to safety features (see the Safety section). Thankfully Benz no longer offers stripped-out, bare-bones base grades. You could even suggest the GLB offers decent value-for-money. Who would’ve thought?
Being a Benz there are a few options packs including AMG Line for the base grade and a $4000 Premium Plus Package with Digital extras.
The CX-30 GT SP is powered by a 2.5-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine producing maximum power of 139kW at 6000rpm and peak torque of 252Nm at 4000rpm.
It’s a proven all-alloy unit featuring direct-injection as well as variable intake and exhaust valve timing with drive going to the front wheels via a six-speed auto transmission.
The AWD version of the GT SP adds an electromagnetic multi-plate clutch pack (managed by a multitude of sensors) to selectively engage the rear wheels, as well. But its engine and transmission combination is identical to this FWD model’s.
Both mild-hybrid versions of the GLB are powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with 48-volt mild-hybrid tech that includes a 1.3kWh lithium ion battery.
The front-wheel-drive GLB200 delivers 120 kilowatts of power and 250 Newton metres of torque for an 8.7-second 0-100km/h dash time.
The all-wheel drive GLB220 4Matic gets a power and torque boost to 140kW/300Nm for a 7.5-second 0-100km/h time. Both petrol grades use an eight-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission.
For the EVs, the rear-drive GLB250+ delivers 200kW/335Nm and hits 100km/h from zero in 7.4 seconds.
The GLB350 4Matic ups that to 260kW/515Nm and a 100km/h dash time of 5.5 seconds.
The CX-30 GT SP FWD’s official fuel consumption figure on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle is 6.6L/100km, the 2.5-litre atmo four-cylinder engine emitting 154g/km of C02 in the process.
It features fuel-saving stop-start and cylinder deactivation functions as standard and over a combination of city, suburban and some freeway running we saw an average of 8.4L/100km, which is average for an SUV in this class. A comparable hybrid package would easily better this result.
Based on the car’s 51-litre fuel tank theoretical range between refills is 772km, which drops to just over 600km using our real-world test consumption number. But the good news is this CX-30 runs happily on cheaper 91 RON ‘standard’ fuel.
The GLB EVs uses a nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) battery with 85kW of usable energy.
Driving range and energy efficiency for the GLB250+ is a decent 570km and 15.5 kilowatt hours per 100km. The two-motor AWD GLB350 range drops slightly to 554km and uses 17.7kWh/100km
The EVs have four regenerative braking modes. After a long morning drive in the GLB350 I recorded 15.5kWh, which is solid.
The new GLB uses an 800-volt architecture supporting DC fast charging up to 320kW. Under the right conditions at a high-powered DC charging station, you can technically add up to 260km of range in 10 minutes, according to Mercedes.
AC charging capacity is available up to 22kW and there are four regenerative braking modes, as well.
When it comes to fuel economy in the mild hybrids, the GLB200 consumes 6.1 litres per 100km and the GLB220 sips 6.5L. This powertrain has the ability to use electric power to coast when cruising at highway speeds.
It’s rare in 2024 to find a small SUV that doesn’t have at least one turbocharger attached to its engine, the CX-30’s 2.5-litre ‘atmo’ four being one of those increasingly scarce examples.
But Mazda’s been laser-focused on extracting maximum power and efficiency from its non-turbo petrol engines for yonks and this one stands up well.
It doesn’t have the low-down punch a turbo typically delivers but maximum pulling power arrives at a useable 4000rpm and it’s eager enough for easy city and suburban running as well as confident freeway cruising.
Although Mazda doesn’t quote an official number you can expect a sprint from 0-100km/h in around 8.5 seconds, which is quick for the class.
Worth noting engine noise and a raspy exhaust note make their presence felt under acceleration and the throttle isn’t as refined as it could be. Not a huge deal, but a slight jerkiness is evident on initial, especially moderate, acceleration.
The six-speed auto is smooth and fuss-free, the steering wheel paddle shifters on hand if you need to intervene and select a specific ratio. ‘Sport’ mode peps things up, causing the transmission to shift down earlier and up later. But it’s aggressive in that it often holds onto a gear for too long and you find yourself diving back to the default normal setting.
Tipping the scales at just under 1.5 tonnes, the CX-30 is underpinned by a MacPherson strut front, torsion beam rear suspension and ride comfort on typically pock-marked urban surfaces is average for the category. That is, a bit jittery over bumps and corrugations but there’s no bone-jarring going on here.
Steering feel and response is good and the grippy steering wheel helps with a connection to the front tyres. Speaking of which, the standard rubber is high-performance (215/55) Dunlop SP Sport Maxx 050 which is grippy and commendably quiet.
Push on into a corner and the CX-30 remains balanced and predictable with body roll well under control. Torque vectoring, by engine and physical braking, is also onboard to reel things in if you overstep the mark.
Braking is by discs all around, vented at the front and solid at the rear, and they wash off speed effectively with a satisfyingly progressive pedal action.
Vision is good, which combined with the CX-30’s compact dimensions and 10.6m turning circle, means parking is easy. Especially when you factor in the hi-res reversing camera and front and rear parking sensors.
I have driven the previous GLB250, which was a fun, punchy SUV. There’s no sporty second-gen variant yet, but if you’re after performance, check out the EV rather than the mild-hybrid.
I only drove the mild-hybrid briefly at the launch event so I’ll focus most of my impressions on the EV. The GLB220 4Matic is quick enough off the line, but there is some lag. Brakes are strong and the cabin is well insulted.
But for me, the EV is the clear pick.
Of the EVs I only drove the GLB350 4Matic as Benz didn’t have a 250+ available.
It’s very quick from a standing start, but not whiplash quick and that is perfectly appropriate for a family-friendly SUV. It delivers the power in a linear manner but when you put the foot down it is very responsive.
I couldn’t detect a massive difference between Comfort and Sport mode to be honest, but you get enough punch in Comfort.
The GLB is tall and top heavy so there is body roll but that’s fine for this sort of vehicle. You’ll notice the weight of this car if you push it into a tight bend at speed - it’s quite heavy and I felt a bit of lateral movement, but the traction control systems help keep the car in check. The grippy tyres help here, too.
Benz has worked hard to improve ride quality with the new-gen model and it shows. The drive route from Melbourne’s south-eastern suburbs to the Mornington Peninsula was littered with potholes, some that looked like they could cause serious damage. The GLB soaked up even some of the sharper holes like a pro. The ride at urban speeds is calm and measured.
The sound deadening measures have clearly helped as well as it is a much quieter cabin than its predecessor. All of this adds to the feeling that this GLB is a more refined, premium SUV than the old model.
I found the steering a little light and twitchy at the start of the drive but by the end of the day I noticed some heft to the feel, and it’s still direct.
The brakes in the EV are a little slower to respond than the mild-hybrid, which takes some time to get used to.
But overall, the drive experience is largely very positive.
The CX-30 carries a maximum five-star ANCAP assessment from early 2020 when the car was introduced locally.
It scored a stunning 99 per cent in the adult occupant protection category and an impressive 88 per cent for child occupant protection.
Active (crash-avoidance) tech includes AEB (operating from 4.0-160km/h) as well as lane keep assist, lane departure warning, traffic sign recognition, intelligent speed assistance, blind-spot monitoring, front and rear parking sensors, rear cross-traffic alert, a reversing camera and tyre pressure monitoring.
Mazda’s ‘Vision Pack’ is also standard which includes a 360-degree camera view, ‘Cruising & Traffic Support’, driver fatigue monitoring and front cross-traffic alert.
The airbag count runs to seven - dual front and front side, full-length side curtains and driver’s knee.
There are three top tether points for child seats across the second row with ISOFIX anchors on the two outer positions.
The 2026 GLB is yet to be tested by Euro NCAP or ANCAP, but Benz says it should happen next year.
Benz has packed the GLB with standard safety gear from the base grade, including:
It also comes with Mercedes’ Pre Safe system that uses sensors to help protect occupants by preparing the cabin milliseconds before an unavoidable crash or rollover. It will tighten the seatbelts, shut any open windows or the sunroof, tighten seat bolsters, move seats to a safer position, and even emit a sound to prepare your ears all in a bid to protect occupants.
The 2026 GLB comes with eight airbags, including curtain airbags that stretch all the way back to cover the third seating row and a front centre bag.
The active driver assist systems (ADAS) are incredibly well calibrated and unobtrusive. No incessant beeping here. In fact I didn’t get beeped once on the launch drive. The most noticeable ADAS warning was a vibration in the steering wheel when I drove close to the lane marking, but it’s subtle.
Mazda covers the CX-30 with a five-year/unlimited km warranty which is the norm in the mainstream market, and it’s worth noting a growing number of competitors are now at six, seven or even 10 years, although the latter are typically conditional on authorised dealer servicing. Roadside assistance is provided for the duration of the warranty.
Service is recommended every 12 months or 15,000km and Mazda’s ‘Service Select’ program sets maintenance pricing out to seven years, the lowest over that period being $352 and the highest $626, for an annual average of $459, which is reasonable but not exceptional for the category.
For comparison, a similarly specified Toyota C-HR averages $330 per workshop visit over the same period.
The GLB comes with Mercedes’ five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is now the standard in the premium segment. The EV’s battery warranty lasts eight years or 160,000km, which is also pretty standard.
Services are required every year or 25,000km which is a decent interval.
Benz offers pre-paid service packages running for three, four or five years. The mild-hybrid is $3430 for three years, $4680 for four and $6300 for five years.
The EV is more affordable to service, costing $2525 for three, $3765 for four and $4440 for five years.
This is quite pricey compared to rivals. BMW’s iX3 is offered with a six-year pre-paid plan and it’s $2420. The Polestar 4 is free to service for the first five years.