Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda CX-5

What's the difference?

‘You get what you pay for’ comes to mind with the CX-3, which is interesting given it’s neither the newest nor most feature-packed SUV in its class.

The ageing light SUV does however offer one of the best-put-together experiences in a car of this size and its engine is powerful for the class. Build quality feels well above par and there aren’t any annoying inclusions that are becoming more common in new cars.

There aren’t many downsides unless you were hoping for a big screen and the ability to play around with software functions, but at this end of the new car spectrum, a car that drives this well and remains stylish a decade on should be applauded.

Put aside its relative (but forgivable) lack of efficiency and somewhat smaller boot than rivals, and the CX-3 nails everything it needs to.

The Mazda CX-5 Evolve kicks some goals and with its comfortable on-road handling, robust safety equipment and practical interior, it’s still a solid choice for families looking for a mid-sized SUV. The only thing it’s missing is a hybrid powertrain, which would make this already well-rounded package even more compelling.

For one, there’s the way it looks inside and out.

The Mazda CX-3 hasn’t remained the most popular car in its segment on price, so the fact its styling continues to age gracefully in the design-focused light SUV segment (aimed at young or first-new car buyers) must have something to do with it.

While it’s been lightly updated a couple of times since 2014, the CX-3 is still in its first generation and has stood the test of time.

Looking like a jacked-up Mazda2, the CX-3 brings some traditional aesthetic to a category peppered with more divisive and daring (but admittedly admirable) designs like the Hyundai Venue, Suzuki Ignis (RIP) or the cute but prohibitively expensive Jeep Avenger.

Some elements of the CX-3, like the chrome trim around the grille or the black plastic cladding along the bottom of the body and around the wheel arches, seemed in the past like they had the potential to age poorly, but Mazda’s design language has only slowly changed since 2015, and the CX-3 still looks at-home in the brand’s line-up.

It’s not the most adventurous - even inside its layout is quite basic - but it does give off a premium vibe and the fact it plays things a little bit safe means the CX-3’s broad appeal is undeniable.

The next-generation Mazda CX-5 is bigger than before, but it retains the sleek body lines and understated styling that have made it such a handsome SUV. The wider front end and repositioned grille give it a more purposeful look than the outgoing model, while the 17-inch alloy wheels keep things suitably restrained.

Inside, the cabin doesn’t feel too basic despite the cloth upholstery. There are plenty of soft-touch materials, a pleasant dashboard and some new technology, including the 12.9-inch multimedia display. You lose most of the physical buttons, though, so there’s a little less of that traditional Mazda tactility.

The fabric seats are cosy and the extra interior space is definitely noticeable. Overall, there is still an understated elegance to the CX-5’s cabin.

The Mazda CX-3 isn’t the most spacious light SUV on the inside, but from either of the front seats it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the best way to make the cabin work.

For example, precious space hasn’t been wasted by two dedicated cupholders, instead there’s a cupholder in the central storage compartment that’s relatively easy to reach into.

Like its design and some of its features, the CX-3’s layout can’t hide its age - there are still big physical controls for the climate settings, the speedometer is a physical dial and the gear selector is a very traditional style.

Mazda’s soon-to-be-gone media control wheel persists in the CX-3, which is by no means a bad thing. It falls nicely to hand, as with many of the controls in the CX-3. Its seating position isn’t too high and the positions you’re able to get the seat and steering wheel into should accommodate most humans.

Behind the front seats it’s a little more spartan. Space is at a premium, with my 178cm frame fitting in the back seat just enough that I had a fair bit of headroom, but my knees were able to brush the seat in front, set to my own driving position.

There are no ports for charging or vents in the second row, but the fold-down armrest has a clever fold-away cupholder. The window shoulder is a little high for young kids to properly see out, but there’s enough light that it doesn’t feel cramped.

The boot is similarly diminutive, a 264-litre space becoming 1174L with the second row folded down. Compare it with the Hyundai Venue and its 355-litre boot, or the Toyota Yaris Cross and its 390 litres, and the CX-3’s simple, well-constructed interior starts to lose points.

The front seats are a particularly comfortable place to spend time, with wide seat bases and plenty of elbow room. Getting in and out is easy thanks to the wide door apertures and 205mm of ground clearance and there’s enough space to settle in for a longer journey.

There’s also plenty of useful storage up front, including a large glove box, dual-opening centre console, cupholders and bottle holders, plus a dedicated phone tray with wireless charging. You get a 12-volt socket and two USB-C ports for keeping everything else topped up.

The 12.9-inch multimedia screen replaces Mazda’s familiar rotary selector with touchscreen operation, which I find easier to use. The updated operating system takes a little while to get your head around and there’s no native sat nav, but otherwise it feels functional and fresh for the new-generation model. Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard, with CarPlay maintaining a solid connection throughout my week.

The extra size of this next-generation model is more noticeable in the back, where improved leg- and headroom is good news for taller adults on longer trips. The rear doors open to almost 90 degrees, making it easier to access the ISOFIX child-seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points.

There’s not a huge amount of extra family-focused kit back in the rear row, but you do get directional air vents, storage bins in each door and a centre armrest with cupholders. My nine-year-old was comfortable, although he did point out the lack of a charging port during a road trip.

And, as a parent, I had one other gripe: keeping the fabric seats clean from my kid’s shoes in rainy weather. Let’s just say some seat covers might be a worthwhile investment.

The boot offers up to 466L with all seats in use. That’s not the largest capacity in the class, but it was more than enough for my little family of three this week. I like the level loading floor, although the boot itself is quite tall, which can make lifting heavier items in and out a little awkward.

I’m also pleased to see a spare tyre, even if it is only a space-saver. And while a powered tailgate would be handy, at this price point I don’t think you’ll really miss it... until you’re standing there with your hands full!

There are five variants available for the third-generation Mazda CX-5, and we’re in the second-from-base Evolve grade for this review. It has a competitive $42,990, before on-road costs price, which puts it neatly among its key rivals. The Hyundai Tucson Hybrid starts at $42,850, while the Kia Sportage SX+ petrol begins at $45,580 and the Toyota RAV4 GX 2WD Hybrid at $45,990, all before on-road costs.

On price alone, the CX-5 looks well placed. But there’s one notable difference - all three rivals offer hybrid powertrains in their respective ranges, while the CX-5 currently does not. And as hybrid power becomes increasingly common in this segment, that omission could prove harder for Mazda to overlook.

The Evolve grade enjoys some solid features though, including:

• Heated front seats
• 12.9-inch multimedia touchscreen
• 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster
• Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto
• Bluetooth
• AM/FM/digital radio
• Leather steering wheel
• Dual-zone climate control
• Two 12-volt sockets
• Wired/wireless phone charging
• Cloth seats
• Keyless entry
• Keyless start
• Rain-sensing wipers
• Electric/auto-folding side mirrors
• LED headlights
• LED DRLs
• Reversing camera

The Mazda CX-3 is still powered by a 2.0-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, as has been the case for years. Its outputs remain at 110kW/195Nm.

It drives the front wheels only, via a six-speed automatic transmission.

The CX-5 is all-wheel drive and powered by a 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine producing 132kW of power and 242Nm of torque. It has a braked towing capacity of up to 1800kg, giving you the option of some light towing on the weekends, while the six-speed automatic transmission shifts smoothly through its gears.

But there’s no escaping the fact that most of its key rivals now offer hybrid powertrains, and you can feel the absence of one here. The CX-5’s petrol engine is perfectly capable, but it doesn’t have the same efficiency advantage that many buyers in this segment are increasingly looking for.

Mazda claims the CX-3 sips 6.3 litres of fuel per 100km, minimum 91 RON petrol, though on test the small SUV returned an 8.1L/100km figure under a mix of urban, highway and some dynamic driving.

With its 48-litre fuel tank, that means you’re realistically likely to get about 550km to a tank, though theoretically given Mazda’s efficiency claim a 760km trip on a single tank would be possible - if you could recreate the test lab conditions.

The CX-5 has a 58-litre fuel tank and claimed combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption of 7.4L/100km, giving it a theoretical driving range of up to 783km. That’s a solid range for a family-sized SUV and means you won’t be constantly thinking about your next fuel stop.

My real-world fuel use settled at 7.8L/100km after a week of longer highway stints and urban trawls, so it’s not too far off Mazda’s official number.

Still, this is where I’d like to see a hybrid powertrain join the CX-5 range. The fuel economy is reasonable, but with so many rivals now offering hybrid options, Mazda is starting to leave some efficiency gains on the table.

The light SUV category is an interesting one, as it feels somewhat like a gateway to bigger SUVs for those who get a taste of the higher seating position. But in city and urban areas, a light SUV should be as much car as someone needs - unless they have two kids or a bunch of equipment to get around with.

This comes down to the fact cars like the CX-3 are more efficient and easier to manoeuvre than their larger counterparts. And as light SUVs go, the CX-3 feels solid, confidence inspiring and more capable when outside its inner-city comfort zone.

Its naturally aspirated engine is big for the class. Even if it doesn’t feel the punchiest off the line it offers plenty of flexibility at higher speeds and makes overtaking on the highway feel less daunting than it would otherwise be in a car this small.

Its steering is light, which is an advantage in everyday driving, but has enough feedback that more dynamic driving is still engaging. It’s not sportscar-sharp, but you wouldn’t want it to be.

While its age would suggest the CX-3 should feel unrefined compared to newer small cars and light SUVs because of what lies underneath, Mazda’s work on the little SUV over the years has resulted in a car that feels mature and capable.

The suspension isn’t perfect, but it manages low-to medium speeds elegantly and does a decent job of maintaining stability at high speeds. It feels better than you’d expect from a car this size on the highway.

The 1294kg kerb weight and small-enough 18-inch wheels mean there’s not too much weight to manage, and there’s enough cushion in the tyres that harsh bumps don’t come crashing into the cabin.

While the CX-3 feels refined for its class, don’t expect a dead-quiet ride, as some road and wind noise make their way in above 80km/h. Then there’s the fact its engine and transmission will sometimes need to get a bit raucous when accelerating quickly. Aside from this, the CX-3 around town and in suburban areas feels nice and calm.

The CX-5 feels composed around town, with power delivered smoothly for everyday driving. But when you need to punch it off the mark, there’s some noticeable lag, and you have to work the engine harder to find the power when tackling a steeper hill at higher speeds. It’s capable enough, but it can feel like you’re asking a little more of it than you should.

The suspension has a firm edge to it, but I like how responsive the steering feels. The CX-5 is genuinely enjoyable through corners, with a dynamic feel and very little body roll.

The cabin is also impressively quiet, with minimal road or wind noise creeping in at higher speeds. Visibility is good through the front and sides, although the A-pillar can get in the way at times.

The reversing camera provides a clear view, while front and rear parking sensors make manoeuvring easier. Overall, it’s not a difficult SUV to park, despite its larger dimensions.

The Mazda CX-5 has a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating from testing conducted in 2025, with strong results across all four assessment categories.

It scored 90 per cent for adult occupant protection, 91 per cent for child occupant protection, 93 per cent for vulnerable road user protection and 87 per cent for its safety assist systems.

Other equipment include:

• 10 airbags
• Blind-spot monitoring
• ISOFIX child seat mounts
• Three top-tether anchor points
• Driver attention alert
• Driver monitoring
• Front collision warning
• Front cross-traffic alert
• Lane departure alert
• Lane keeping aid
• Rear cross-traffic alert
• Reversing camera
• Traffic sign recognition
• Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) - operational from 0-180km/h.

Mazda offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is behind the curve for a mainstream brand these days. Rival brands like Kia and Hyundai offer seven years, for example, with some offering up to 10.

Servicing is undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, with servicing costing between $353 and $633 per visit. Total cost over the first seven years currently sits at $3233, averaging $462 a service, which is pricey considering the relatively simple mechanicals under the CX-3.

Mazda says there are more than 150 certified service dealerships across the country, with a tool to find the most convenient one for you. Given the CX-3’s advanced age, chances are there won’t be too many mechanical issues that haven’t been worked out in the last decade.

The CX-5 is covered by Mazda’s five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, which also includes five years of roadside assistance. It’s a solid offering, although longer warranty terms are becoming increasingly common in this segment.

Servicing is reasonably priced at around $440 per service over seven years, and the intervals are well spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. That should make ongoing ownership relatively straightforward for families.